Battle of Agincourt in 1 minute using Google Earth
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 ต.ค. 2024
- Made using Google Earth.
The Battle of Agincourt from start to finish.
___
Music:
Song: Aliaksei Yukhnevich - Empire on Fire (No Copyright Music)
Music provided by Tunetank.
Free Download: bit.ly/3fkwxO8
Video Link: • Aliaksei Yukhnevich - ...
___
(Not endorsed by Google, this video is completely made by me. This video is not sponsored by Google.)
This video is for educational purposes.
![[UNCUT] "บอสณวัฒน์" แฉ! แหล่งซุกเงินแก๊งบอส ขยันผิดที่ไม่กี่ปีก็เข้าคุก l คนดังนั่งเคลียร์ l17ต.ค.67](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/BL56qIfXYZM/mqdefault.jpg)
600 years later and it's still just a farmer's field.
I know right. It could've been like a memorial
@@AverageLittleBoy why would the french want to memorialize one of their greatest defeats in the hundred years war?
@@AverageLittleBoy Honestly I think it fits, wars and people come and go yet the land stays the same.
If people wanna visit the field I’m sure they could just come and take a look.
@@fankaydarius5849 for the people 6 ft under
It's fertile, ameliorated with the french fertilizer
The horrible experience of being trapped inside your enemy must be terrifying, knowing you cant do anything to escape
I think one tactic that was employed was to leave an avenue of retreat when enveloping. The thought being that if men are encircled, they will fight to the death, but if given the chance to retreat, they will(you see the French doing that here right before full encirclement).
The overall reason was that, historically, most of battle deaths occured during the retreat, when men were chased down and killed.
-stalingrad, 1943
inside 😳
@@revon7202 😳
You can escape just push to the front line
From what I understand, once your surrounded like that, it's impossible to move, you have a sheild, sword, and Armour, and everybody is being pushed together, and the space between each individual soldier is so tight, you can't get your arms up, and you can't move anywhere.
You're trapped, hearing the shouts and screams from everyone on the battle front waiting for your turn to face the enemy at a horrible disadvantage
That scott something rapper incident, korea incident. People just trampled each other. And imagine its during a battle. Game of thrones- battle of bastards did a good job.
Yes. It is very rare for massacres like this to happen during the battle itself. Historically, casualties would shoot up from maybe hundreds to thousands or ten thousands once your cavalry pursued the enemy during a rout. Hence why orderly retreats were a huge goal when the battle was lost. As opposed to a mass of humanity fleeing the enemy who has now found themselves in a bloodlust.
I'm from Rome. In schools they still teach us how Hannibal brilliant tactics were our worst defeat in Cannae. They say legionairs in the middle didn't even realize what was happening on the sides. In 6 hours, 60000 romans were killed.
@@mantralibre1367 cannae was brutal
@@jacobylamb2306you can say that. 😂💀
Henry V testing his plot armour
LOL
he is not dead in this battle.
He couldn't beat the diarrhea, though.
I think I am correct in saying that the French losses were greater than usual in such a defeat, because of the number of French held back and not engaged. The English (that's my lot) simply could not afford to take any prisoners from that main fight, even though the ransom value for many of the French Knights would have been astronomical. Taking French prisoners meant taking English fighting men away from the fight, which the English could not risk doing given the other French forces that had yet to engage, lurking in the background and seemingly poised to join. The fact that the other French forces did not engage, must have been frustrating from a financial reward perspective, knowing just how valuable the many French corpses might have been, had they only been kept alive as prisoners.
Well, you seemingly forgot the burgundian looters who got to the English camp. The smoke coming from behind their lines made them think another army was coming to attack them in the rear, so they had no other choice but to kill the prisoners.
@@valff5770 🤓
This is the generous interpretation.
The other was that they weren't able to fight another battle and have chosen to send a very clear message what could happen if the French reserves would fight.
Wow, it's amazing how anglos can justify any war crime they have commited in history and at the same time presenting themselved as the most moral people in the history. If other peoples don't take prisoners, they are bad; but Anglos are the masters of morals and that rules don't apply to them
@@darkmaster9670 Giving no quarter is common for the era, it's honourable, chivalrous even. Ransoming was seen as pathetic for the captive, and akin to banditry for the ransoming force. You're applying modern mores to the 15th century.
so THATS why Agincourt is so famous. I also love how half the army was there the entire battle, and just stood there.
Sending more would have just killed them, the ground was so wet and the French were too heavy
@@Reichsritter Ah, that makes sense
@@barrybeebenson3885 Also the forces that weren't in combat, were mostly personal guard of the commander and some auxiliary
Probably archers, crossbowmen and armed servants and whatnot. Not meant to be used as melee troops.
That third line of the French army is mostly French archers. There was no point in sending them to certain death as well. Regardless, they remained fairly inactive during the battle.
Imagine the hail of arrows raining towards you if you were the french soldier during that battle.
Depends were you one of the two thousand that didn’t escape? Or were you lucky enough to escape the surrounding Brit’s
Ya like just imagine
Every French soldier gangsta untill a English with longbow arrives
"Then we will fight in the shade"
@@cuberrt Yeah except these arrows could pierce armour with enough energy left to actually pin a knight to his horse.
The battle of Agincourt marked end of old French chevalerie and literally, brutally stopped lineages of some great old aristocratic families.
They hadn’t learned their lesson at Kortrijk in 1302.
@@MinusTheRogue is that city in Flanders located ?
@@flanders1101 aye
@@MinusTheRogue The Battle of Courtrai is the exception, not the rule. The French defeated the Flemings on numerous occasions (Mons-en-Pévèle (1304), Cassel (1328), Roosebeke (1382), ...). Likewise, the Battle of Agincourt does not sum up the Hundred Years' War, since the French won all the battles between 1429 (siege of Orléans) and 1453, allowing them to expel the English and win the war.
The French almost certainly killed more of their own in that battle. The ground was soft and freshly plowed, plus heavy rain the night before made the battlefield a quagmire very quickly. Countless nobles were found dead, suffocated by the mud as they were trampled be people either side, with the French in their desire to close and quickly defeat the outnumbered English, most certainly having the greatest "friendly fire" incidents. Although plenty of famous English nobles died in a similar manner, including relatives of the English King who fought on the front lines.
Overall this battle's is one of my favourite from history for many factors. Firstly I'm English (British) and take pride in the underdog win (although we ultimately lost the war). Secondly the strategic brilliance from one side, and the cost of overconfidence on the other. Now while strategic brilliance may be the wrong word when compared to the likes of Julius Caesar or Alexander, I feel like the English got damn near everything right, even taking advantage of something they are very used to in their country, the rain.
But ultimately it comes back to the decision of previous English Rulers to incorporate the Longbow (from the Welsh, who also fought as mercenaries in this battle), into the English army. Overall the English army by this part had a level of professionalism few nations in the world could match at that time of history. Nobles, while trained for war often had grudges and rivalries to settle, and used peasant levies as the greater portion of armies, with few elite/trained cores, usually in the form of mercs. The English at this time were mostly beyond such rivalries and were united behind their king, while the kingdom had a professional level of english levies in the form of Longbowmen to raise. Said Longbowmen had great strength (pulling that bow potentially hundreds of times in one battle required great strength and stamina), which they used to bludgeon the heavily armoured and cumbersome knights and men at arms towards the end.
That final charge is the strategic brilliance, as the archers were prepared with mallets, hammers and axes for just this purpose. And the King/commander, not sure how much credit he can claim, as he was stuck in the thick of the fighting in the centre. But the archers usually weak in melee to trained heavy infantry/cavalry, completely turned the battle due to the quagmire like nature of the battlefield.
The final seperation where the English stood around 2,000 men before killing them? They were all captured prisoners, the Nobles being separated into the smaller group. The French flew the Oriflamme, and stated no mercy. And due to number of prisoners vs soldiers/guards and supplies, the English King ultimately ordered no mercy for the majority of the captured french. Only the greatest value in ransom from Nobles were spared, as without that gold that years campaign would have ultimately been a massive loss for the English without it.
As for the French... their main screw up was celebrating too early, indulging in wine before the night before the battle while the English King ordered otherwise (not that they had much supplies) wanting his men as fresh and ready as possible. A clear reminder from history for all, no matter the advantage, you can still lose.
You can never not have a celebratory event without wine. That’s simply what we have done for hundreds of years. And especially after the war, which as you know, resulted in a decisive Valois victory.
@@strasbourgeois1 VAULOIS VAULOIS VAULOIS
@@strasbourgeois1 And yet who won the Seven Years War and relegated France to the dustbin of history? Britain.
Ooo i love these long comments
@@sfooter1692 France was certainly not in the dustbin of history. That goes to the UK. Had the largest empire, and yet remains relatively irrelevant in Europe, and to an extent, the world. Unlike Britain, France actually has direct influence in Africa and even in Asia. The UK? Well, the only think they accomplished post-colonial wise was having the English language spoken widely.
This is why you don't auto reseolve
Almost 6,000 FRENCHMAN LOST THEIR LIVES during the BATTLE OF AGINCOURT, WHILE ENGLISH DEATHS AMOUNTED TO JUST OVER 400. With odds greater than three to one, Henry had won one of the great victories of military history.
henry was a based chad
the British destroyed the French
@@Spyros5k
Hahahahaha 😆 🤣 😂
@@Spyros5k too based
Odds weren't greater than three to one. It's time to accept that Shakespeare's History isn't true History. The most accepted modern estimate talks about 8,000 English vs about 12,000 French.
And other battles of that war had worse casualty ratios, LIKE PATAY WHERE 2,500 ENGLISH WERE KILLED OR CAPTURED WHILE LESS THAN 10 FRENCH PEOPLE DIED, or LA BROSSINIERE WHERE 1,700 ENGLISH WERE KILLED WHILE A SINGLE FRENCH KNIGHT DIED.
40 years later reverse Agincourt in Castillon : England : "We have longbow"
France : "We have cannons"
and the battle of patay in 1429
@@thurimthurim8395 Patay was like : 1 french dead versus the whole english army dead
@@briouck1964 still less casualties at patay and castillon than at the one battle of sluys where 20,000 French sailors were killed
@@lollius88 At Sluys there were not 100 men per ship (and some of the barges were not ships). Only a few from the crew were combatants. Around 30 of the real ships scaped. So probably at Sluys the english drowned 15000 most of which were just merchant sailors. The references used for the battles of Sluys and Agincourt are like The Sun saying a million russians have died in the current conflict.
@@andreoliveira685 drowned, killed same shit.
They were casualties, mode of death wasnt too important.
No one can deny that the deadliest battles of the war were all english victories.
Add that to the death toll from the chevauchees, then you can tell that the french casualties in the whole war were way more than the English ones
they used the same tactic of Hannibal against Roma, in the battle of Cannae. absorb the impact in the center of the arm, then surround it with the wings
Hannibal did not invent the concept of surrounding large groups of enemies.
@@AvengerAtIlipa I don't know who invented this tactic
Except, in this case it was with infantry and archers only, no cavalry.
Lesson: always train your troops when fighting in war
Lol their best troops did the attacking.
@@aksmex2576 yep they had many French knights
Bro the french literally lost lost hundreds of professional nobles in this single battle😳 they sucked because of the muddy terrain that literally bogged them down to be sitting ducks waiting to get shot at by 4000 english longbowmen lmao
Someone doesn't know history
@@greatnessofthelack1198 someone doesn't know jokes.
France: NOOOOO You can't just take a city with less troops!
England: encirclement go brrrrrrr
England: NOOOOO you can’t just blow us up with cannons we have longbows!
France: haha cannons go boom
@@Heisenberg882
France: NOOOOOO you can't just scrap our submarine deal with Australia we need the political clout!
UK: Haha Anglosphere go brrr
@@Heisenberg882 France: NOOOOO you can’t just keep taking parts of mainland France! There’s barely any English people living there!
England: Haha Norman Empire Go brrrrr
This comment section is a fight between English and French people
@@YourAveragePersonOnTheStreets England: NOOOO you can’t just conquer all our territories in France
Phillip Augustus: haha France goes brrrr
I like how the french had a giant reserve army, presumably to encircle the would-be-encirclement, only to not actually use it when their frontline got trapped.
They were probably archers and shit like that
They're archers.
they were probably just archers and were using crossbows.
They were Italian crossbow men. Equipped with a heavy shield on their back so they can turn around and reload. They also would have been in the field moving forward to get in range. Not sitting back. Most of the French sitting back were the nobility class. Basically the family members of those being slaughtered.
No one can deny that was an impressive victory
If you see the battle in detail, you will see that it wasn't really impressive 'cause the England won the battle cowardly
@@falcoerd5422 it was 5000 Vs 14000 by shear numbers alone the French should have won as it was more than double than the English and it was a time before guns so hiding behind a trench and shooting wasn't a option
@@crwansaunt6441 yes but you can't be proud of the strategy 'cause english people hide and take avantage of the landscap by taking the upper position face to a dirt field, wich is normal 'cause in War honnor isn't an option but Victory was wathever how but only the Victory is important, but for me it was not a Victory to be proud of
@@falcoerd5422 You're literally calling people cowards for using smart tactics and facing and onslaught of an army over twice their size. The fact the english didn't immediately break after taking the brace of the first charge shows their courage and the fact they kept fighting even after the second wave shows their determination. Sounds like you're just a sore loser, you can't be mad one side actually used smart tactics while the other side just tried to Leroy Jenkins it and failed.
@@nathancrawshaw2708 i only said that it wasn't a great tactical Victory, and if England keep fighting it's because the French can't move more and were shoot by arrow everywhere they were Trap and die as pig, this battle is just not really something that you could be proud of, especially when you see the mentality of Henry V and the massacre of prisoners
You never disappoint
what
I'm Disappointed
@@soap_geo hes talking to the person that made this
I remember this battle. It was amazing.
ah yes you were there
A disaster from my side
A cowardly win Victory as England made many times...
@@falcoerd5422 what?
@@vladthelad7508 the battle wasn't a great Victory for England
Wow the way how 5.6k troops incirceld 10k was insane
10 тысяч это в сумме с резервами, которые потом убежали.
gotta feel sorry for the French. They don't often lose battle or war, but everytime they do, people won't shut up about it hundreds of years later.
Exactly. The english forget too much that at the end they lost the Hundred Years War :')
Those 'people' are mainly British and from other english-speaking countries though. The same that are taught that Agincourt is the only battle of the Hundred Year's war, and Waterloo the only one of the Napoleonic wars.
"gotta feel sorry for the French."🤓
@@nahlokin6509 Lucky for France, perhaps, that after Agincourt Henry V died before the French King, otherwise France and England would have been united under an Anglo-French Monarchy of an English born King. The French realm was saved by either sunstroke, or dysentery of which dispatched Henry, otherwise who knows what we would make of history today.
People hate overachievers, the superiority of the French results in constant jealousy.
The French has the huge numbers but their tactics were so ineffective compared to the English that time. A single encirclement and baam, nearly 6000 french soldiers gone.
Their tactics ended the Plantagenet welsh archer at Patay definitively
they still lost the war
@@baseplate7566 cope froggy
@@baseplate7566 And the French won, but at what cost?
@@KungFuWizardOfJesus pretty sure french had like 50,000 casualties, its not that much compared to the soviets, and the war assured that no more british in france and also after the war france became a superpower so it was a complete victory, learn some history before talking to me.
Amazing video as always!
You should do Battle of Mohaçs or Siege of Buda (1541)
how do you make it so extremely detailed? I make war animations also, and get most of my info from Eastory and your channel. how do you get the exact points where armies attack?
He just made it up
@@microvvaveoven how do you know
@@microvvaveoven The very last little detail is unknown, but a lot of information is available about this kind of battle. Plus some educated guesses, you can have the video without "making it up" (no, educated guesses are not the same as making shit up
The battle of Agincourt is usually taught as a case of English underdogs beating a 'superior' foe. But in reality, the English had been stomping the French this exact same way for over a generation by this point.
Yep, you can add multiple battles like this to the list, Crecy being another French stuffing by the English.
@@leejames1792 And Poitiers, which I believe was the most disgusting with only 60 English losses against a force of 16,000 French including the king who was captured.
@@WillieFungo This is the exact opposite, the English were so afraid of the French on land they let Europe to the French and focused on the marine where they were better (French did win the war by the way).
How to deal with excessive nobles, French style
And that's what I call *Plot armor*
Eu admiro esses comandantes militares, que com a metade de soldados do inimigo, conseguiram criar planos de batalha perfeitos, e sofrerem poucas baixas! Vide Anibal!
Continue like this! You’re so good at animating!
what happened to the 3 generals (i’m assuming they are generals) at the end of the video
great video as always! Can you make som video on Otoman empire? Battle of Mohacs or siege of Vienna?
Mohaçs would be cool!
When i come across with that battle i remember one of my teenager fight.
There were a friend of mine and he was going to fight with a group of 3 so he decided to ask people if they willing to join him in that fight. After some time he gathered a group of 5 and one of them was me. We were sure we had the numbers and gonna wreck them for good. When we came face to face with those 3, 3 of our group just went directly into them, left 2 of us behind. We 2 were sure our friends gonna wreck them because they were fierce when they got into it, so we stood and watch them. After a few seconds it was our 3 laying on the ground and their 3 still on their feet. It suddenly became 2 vs 3 and those who fallen were the fiercest of us...
We did the same thing as the remnants of the French army did in Agincourt. It became my own Agincourt. Shameful but i can see what happened there...
How do you animate these videos?
U can use kinemaster but ...
@@Hamza50K info, alight motion for doing this on mobile
@@Ethereal.X1234 How?
Imagine walking alongside that road in the centre, knowing a whole ass battle took place.
great video
could you do battle of Grunwald next?
Funneled them downhill on a muddy field and trapped ‘em. Good use of topography and resources.
Is this the one where half the soldiers actually drowned in the ponds of horse blood-heavy rain mixture, rather than getting struck and killed by the opposition?
And if im remembering correctly, the opposition fought all naked or without armor so they wouldnt drown like the enemy?
Not naked iirc but they didn't wear plate armour like the French knights did. Also they put spikes up in front of the longbows to bottleneck the incoming cavalry onto the sodden ground so they would be less effective
This was part of Henry's tactic using the mud and having his troops lightly armoured for better mobility
Yeah, and the French army was being pelted with arrows from their undefended sides the entire time until the English ran out of arrows.
How do y’all do these animations?
Extremely outnumbered
Just shows the power of encirclement’s I guess
12,000 vs 8,000 isn't extremely outnumbered
@@TheSoup87 yeah, this was like the early blitzkrieg encirclements in history
@@lahire4943 yeah but if you still look at the numbers that is still a huge number back then.
Brutal brutal end to a brutal brutal battle.
That's what happens when you charge in your cavalry like a mad man. Always use them as a hammer and your infantry as your anvil.
This battle alone showcased the epitome of French arrogance and their hubris.
Cavalry are best for shock, flanks , recon, and skirmishes. You smash a hammer onto an anvil so you hit your own men with cavalry ?
@@johnnyboygriffin5764
No heavy infantry engages the enemy and forces them to fight, heavy infantry can hold their ground but alone cannot effectively push and kill many of the enemy formation, but if a force of cavalry is charging the enemy from behind at the same time, not only does the cavalry kills several with their lances and crush many with 800 kilograms of metal and flesh crashing into people at 25 mph, but they are effectively slamming the entire formation into the spears of your own infantry. in a single minute THOUSANDS die, and the rest route, while usually even after an hour of fighting infantry against infantry will only yield a few hundred casualties unless one encircles the other.
Actually most of the english nobleman of that time were french descendant from the conquest of England so I guess the "French arrogance and hubris" should be on both sides that day.
And the battle of patay was won by a leading charge of cavalry mad man.
Just say you don't like french people it would be easier lol
Your new style is wonderfull
Hello, could you please do the Battle of Castillon next. The last battle of the Hundred Years War and the rise of artillery on the battlefield. Thanks.
Frenchie spotted 🤢🤮
@@BennyVegas313 Which country are you from, so that we can joke together lol
@@clementphilippe4888 probably Australia.
@@clementphilippe4888 I live in Westeros, Los Santos.
@@BennyVegas313qu'est ce qu'elle veut la merde anglo saxonne
Between 1357-1424 the English were almost unbeatable in major set piece battles.
A big defeat indeed.
Everyone forget that 14 years later at the battle of Patay, 5 000 english longbowmen lost against 1400 men.
Hardly of the same ilk. Peasant longbow men losing to knights vs knights losing to peasants at Agincourt.
@@sfooter1692 I've had it with people thinking Longbows alone can defeat cavalry, Patey is proof of that, without infantry support Archers are useless
Attacking into a concave? Military genius right there.
Men on the flanks were concealed i think
@@kennooo535 I suppose they made the classical mistake of underestimating their opponent. I don't really know anything about this battle, other than this video.
This is very good
Quite remarkable to think that the result of this campaign, and fallout thereafter essentially won Henry V the French Crown. Had Henry V not suddenly died 2 months before the French King Charles VI, it would have resulted in England and France uniting into a single Kingdom under a single Anglo-French monarchy.
WHO never miss even a single day withut their vlog YOU GUYS make so many people happy. May god bless you guys always 🙏❤️
Bot comment.
Why is this satisfying
"Anne Curry in her 2005 book Agincourt: A New History, argued, based on research into the surviving administrative records, that the French army was 12,000 strong, and the English army 9,000, proportions of four to three" - Anne Curry, English historian and specialist of the Hundred Years'War
we'll never know the true numbers but yes they were closer in size than was previously thought.
I remember this battle. My grandfather set up a hot dog stand and sold popcorn as well.
so all along,hitler had learned his encirclements from the british
These are called "cauldrons" and are a common war tactic. It's been used effectively by the Russians in the war for Ukraine. You either neutralize enough enemies to close the cauldron, or you wait for more enemies to enter it. When there's an optimal level or enemy presence in the cauldron, you close it and encircle them.
As for the nazis, their blitzkrieg used different tactics. They would make a line, with heavy armor at the tip, in the shape of an arrow, to penetrate the front. They would then keep feeding the line with more and more supplies. The line would then branch out and encircle the enemies. The key was overwhelming speed and force.
I like how in the beginning there is a recon element to the right and after "Blue Force" pushes the recon element back in the forest, they are like "Ha-ha...stupid fools, now lets focus back on the field and don't send a recon element of our own to scout the forest and guard the flank."
This battle was overrated tbh
Not if you were the victor.
Overrated, how so? Seems to me that the English executed their plans with ruthless tactical efficiency, defeating in spectacular fashion, on their own soil, and battlefield of choice, a larger, better supplied, better equipped and more heavily armed French foe. The French, on this day, were outsmarted, outwitted, and blinded by overconfidence and as such were lurred to their doom, paying dearly for their arrogance by having the bulk of their army surrounded and destroyed.
The French lost a swave of their nobility and some Prince's in a single action, in a single day by a numerically inferior, bloodied, and ill-supplied adversary, while the English suffered considerably light casualties. There is nothing overrated about the victory at Agincourt, if the shoe was on the other foot, the French too would praise such a feat.
It was more than 14000.
The French had 10,000 men-at-arms, 5,000 archers and crossbowmen and 10,000 mounted and armed servants
France still won the war.
Ireland IRE meaning angry in old English angryland explains alot.
What programme is this?
Damned weather :(
How do you did the animation ? I really enjoyed it Thanks for your work
In 0:10 go see down
Nice to see in 1450's Cement Roads and Modern Houses!
They may have won the battle, but haven’t won the war.
En français bg
Thats what napolean said just before waterloo.
@@14Duval On 18th Feb 1797, French troops landed near Fishguard - repelled by a local women armed with a pitchfork.
@@14Duval "the Irish, those poor people you loved so much to oppress." Boo hoo, nigga.
@@asl7235 Britain lost to a woman as well
I love when people say stuff like this is inaccurate.
Slava Rossi
@@someturkishguy8638 what?
My honor is loyalty.
@@IceBreaker.22 what?
Great video man, keep it going
truely just a magnificent battle
remember son, numerical don’t matter in war. skill does
I would like to see the sources for such detailed positions and movements of the troupes. The existing records give only brief descriptions of this battle. I frankly doubt the shown details and would say this video is more or less fantasy or wild assumptions.
Nevertheless I would be happy to learn about the sources allowing such detailed visualization.
there should be a tutorial on how to make video like that (theres alot but what makes you stand out is the fact the animation thingys are smooth and the counter changes live)
Not Agincourt ! ☹️
The battlefield is Azincourt !
En fait la version anglaise est celle d'origine. Dans les textes du 15e s. il est dit "Agincourt" et non "Azincourt", qui est plus tardif. Un "z" dans un nom de localité médiévale en France est plutôt improbable.
@@TheFrenchscot merci 🙏 bcp pour cette précision. Donc, si je comprends bien, les anglais doivent rectifier leur erreur ... ils ne sont pas foutus d’écrire correctement 🤣
Long live the Scotland and the Auld alliance !! 😁👍
@@gorealain7897 il n'y a pas vraiment d'erreur. Les anglais ont juste gardé la version d'origine, comme ils le font souvent et car il s'agit de celle des textes d'alors. Shakespeare a en quelque sorte "figé" le nom dans Henry the 5th. Tandis que du côté français le nom a évolué normalement, comme tous les noms de localité. Conclusion : aucune des deux versions n'est fausse. Bonne journée!
@@TheFrenchscot merci bcp 👍😁
the battle took place in a completely different way
France moment
That's why they won both parts of the Hundred Years' War I guess
@@lahire4943 and loses more people than England too
@@MsRockie England wasnt even the back bone of the Angevin Empire, ofc more french would die seems its a french civil war
@@MsRockie The Soviet Union lost more men than Germany in ww2, does that mean they lost?
@@Heisenberg882 cause german killing civilians lol
looks like a total war battle, one side just slowly closes in as they have superior numbers or are simply killing more enemy units
The Battle of Patay.
What app is this?
Rename video as "Honorables knights versus cowards longbows in Agincourt"
Lol. Don’t throw stones. Honourable knights attacking a starving and retreating enemy. French honour
What app do you use to make these videos?
One of the most incredible victories in military history.
lol
short story behind the battle would be nice
*azincourt
aging court
Archery was considered by the French knighthood code of chivalry as a dishonorable and coward weapon. They didn't even bothered advancing their own bowmen and expected to fight face to face between knights. The French also expected to logically crushed the English men-at-arms but they were eventually decimated by distant arrows...
The battle of Patay was better.
What program do you use to do that man?
The French didn't surrender until the end, the British won by sneaky means instead of fighting like men, and the French won the war : Business as usual.
French Cope
"fighting like men" you would have sh8t your pants if you were there, Face it, the French have a rep for running and getting beat, deal with it.
You would not be a good general...
@@leejames1792 They won the war and nearly 75% of the battle with the english on land.
when ranged weapons killed honor forever... A day of infamy
Claim your here within an hour ticket here!
no
Bruh
how are you editing these to make em?
Common French L
France won the war lol
@@Heisenberg882 A war that lasted for over 100 years, because the English managed to hold their shit together and make significant moves against the French for over 116 years. England was able to win battles even after civil war broke out and had to deal with other significant internal and external issues, they may have lost the war but proved to be resilient and strong enough to deal with many threats at the same time
@@ebanydwayne1357 All that and they still lost.
Kind of amazed how it's just a farm and not a protected historical site
Quite rare for a country to commemorate a battle where they got their arses kicked.
I'm more impressed by the english infantry for holding for so long
absolute tanks
I love yourr channel
how did the english number drop so slow compare to the french dropping like a fly? what was the army composition? i know english had longbows but this was in melee range? i felt like a roman legion against a horde of barbarians lmao.
the longbowmen overwhelmed the cavalry charge, broke the moral and then surrounded from the flanks with melee weapons
The French elite is still very upset about the result of that batlle!
I cant imagine how does it feel like 2000 soldiers to be encircled in such a small area
Раз на раз вышли, я так понимаю, второй просто посмотреть приходил)
Henry V being an absolute Chad...
Лидеры стран!!! Прекратите это, остановитесь!Это жизни ребят!Все они, неважно русский или украинец, все должны жить!
Can you make a tutorial about how you manage to do this types of video?
Never understand how French kept fighting like this you think their knights would have learned to stop being so prideful
They underestimated the power of the archers and charged in muddy and steep terrain, this battle has literally changed the way of fighting. This was the end of chivalry and the advent of artillery.
@@numa5810 they did this same crap several times like against the ottomans the only reason things probably changed here is they lost a lot of noble knights ended them
@@dustintacohands1107 At that time the bow wasn't able to drill a chainmail that's why the french used crossbow and wasn't afraid of archers. The longbow revolutionized artillery cause they could inflict a mortal wound to a knight AND shot a lot faster than the french crossbow that why the battle of agincourt marked the end of chivalry and close combat and the superiority of artillery.
@@numa5810 I know all that and I already know the history of this battle dude like how the english put dirt in their mouth before the battle the all that small stuff why are you trying to teach me? I watch and read about a lot of war history I don’t need a lecture from you thanks.
@@dustintacohands1107 Calm down mate, i was just replying at your comment "Never understand how French kept fighting like this"
Large waste portion of French army is viewing their portion of army getting destroyed by some 6000 English knights ,they could have decisively won the battle but lost.