If you're trying out X-plane stuff I would highly recommend giving the Challenger 650 by Hot Start a go. One of (if the not the most) detailed and comprehensive add ons for any sim and an incredibly satisfying experience. I mostly use MSFS I but the Challenger calls me back regularly :)
@@activex7327 *shrug* we all value things differently. I personally value the depth of the physical systems and the avionics more, and for me they more than make up for the fact visually it doesn’t look as good as the best stuff in msfs or whatever. Worth every penny as far as I’m concerned.
Thank you for doing the flight from the first officer side. I always alternate the views when I sim. 😊I also go back and forth C/FO, depending on what is being done.
Toliss has random failures enabled by default, so the Wing Anti-Ice was probably indeed failed. You can turn them off in the Toliss menu. Also to get the Cabin Ready you need to push the FWD Calls button both on takeoff on landing.
On newer Toliss versions: Cabin Ready will eventually appear. You can force it by pressing the calls. This is to simulate the attendants not having yet acknowledged or perhaps forgot to contact. The random failures are nice BUT the default frequency isn't realistic imo. 1-4 failures on avg for a 1hr flight? Granted, maybe 2 of those are advisory and 2 will probably be reset only. I.E Gen 1 tripping offline. Reset will work, then SDAC 1 fail. That's advisory only since SDAC 2 remains op. The AMAZING thing about Toliss though is if you follow the real world FCOM procedure for this-resetting SDAC breakers..this clears the fault too! You can use the toliss menu if you want to cheat. Many failures are like this.
There should be an update to the visuals on the A346 soon, since Toliss has done that to the rest of their lineup recently. It won't be up to the visual fidelity of MSFS but it will certainly be a huge upgrade over the current textures.
It seems that you are gonna spend a lot of money on aircraft for Xplane :D In Xplane 11 there also is Boeing 727 Boeing 737 classic and a lot more, which would be very interesting to see how you fly it, when they would get updated to xplane 12
For the butter pusback put the doawnloaded foulder inside of the plugin folder of x-plane 12 , once you find your x-plane folder here is the path towards the plugin folder X-Plane 12\Resources\plugins
Hey Emmanuel, very nice Video :D The A340-600 is certainly one of the most impressive things in the skies out there! Looking into your Video description, I can see that your i9-9900K might be the culprit for your performance. Especially when paired with a 4090, the i9-9900K should be fairly maxed out. I'd recommend swapping it with a 12th or 13th Gen Intel Core or a Ryzen 7000 Series chip. Hope that helps.
Hello Emmanuel, in x plane you can set custom camera's by pressing ctrl+(any number on your number pad). This makes it easier to switch between your camera presets instead of spending time holding the arrow keys. Hope this help ya!
I was going to recommend getting a Toliss aircraft for your type rating, Emi; I’ve been using the A320neo and although there are a couple of niggles, I think it’s really pretty systems accurate
Hi again, really nice to see your videos. I've noticed you've done the airbus FCOM briefing method, the problem is that it doesn't say when and how to brief the route and the SID chart. So you've saved the fpln but didn't brief it later on. I can't tell you what to do of course but it'd be cool next time you do a video flying the a320/30/40 aircraft you did a full briefing explaining these. Thanks a lot :)
Hi, this was the full briefing. I'll do videos explaining the "smarter briefing" As Airbus calls them. They basically say "every Pilot can read a chart, so every Pilot can compare the flight plan to the chart themselves. No need to do that together. The briefing shall only be used to highlight the specials of the flight, not the standards that both pilots can check of their own".
@@A330Drivercool! Nice to hear that you'll do videos about it! Thanks for your answer, I've seen videos where they brief it together for things like the climb gradient and the route itself, that's why I've asked. Thanks :)
I really hope they get round to updating the textures. They only just recently brought the 321 and 319 cockpit textures up to the 320neo standard so fingers crossed the 340 gets the same treatment sometime soon. That overhead panel texture alone makes me doubt the asking price. We’ve been spoilt with the quality of recent flight sim graphics
I'd like to welcome you to the world of Toliss Airbus :) Despite the shortcomings of X-Plane in the visual areas, those planes pretty good airplanes and often underrated or overlooked. You said it spot on: If you wanna have the best system simulation and flight dynamics then you are absolutely at the right place with Toliss and X-Plane. I hope however that Toliss will update the A340-600 to the latest A320Neo standards with working printer and updated cockpit texturing. Rgds PC
I have had this plane since it came out. It has been updated to XP12 and functionality added but visually as far as I can tell it’s the same just bug fixes. The cockpits are dark in both msfs and XP12 it’s probably a function of the lighting models they use. The ToLiss A320 Neo cockpit is superb and tbf as good as anything in msfs but it’s subjective. It would be nice to see the other ToLiss aircraft updated but tbh I’m just glad I get to fly the ToLiss Airbus aircraft. They are well made I carnt speak to the professional level that Emi can but as a ‘serious’ simmer I find them a challenge to learn and a joy to fly. I’m happy that we have both msfs and XP to enjoy aircraft in both. I’m looking forward to any in-depth tutorials as I’m sure I’m doing a lot wrong, but as you say you never stop learning in aviation it’s one of the things that I love bout it
Hello Emmanuel! Excellent video! Do you mind sharing your X-Plane 12 graphic settings, plugins, shaders, etc.? Thank you very much in advance. Greetings from Quito, Ecuador! ✈✈
Nice video again. I really regret that there will not be a A330 of this quality for X-plane. Unfortunately the Aerosoft version of MSFS is not ready yet and Prepar3D dropped support for the latest version.
Great video, thank you! Although they could probably reach more people by making this aircraft model for MSFS, I'm honestly glad that they made it for X-Plane. MSFS is great for looking at scenery. However the inability to set RVR and visibility or even high-priced add-ons (with wording "Fully customized system simulation for all major and minor aircraft systems and components." on their website) not having working weather radars (at least it's mentioned on the website albeit indirectly) etc. really keeps me from using MSFS more. Maybe I am biased but I really prefer X-Plane for simulation of IFR flying or for messing with aircraft (e.g. observing what a DC-3 would do with 30% more powerful engines or how would a Super Cub handle JATO rockets). MSFS on the other hand is great for simulating sightseeing flights - you don't have to setup scenery streaming or make your own orthoscenery like in X-Plane, it's already there.
As someone who starded flight simulations with MSFS, I would love to go to X-plane, but I don't want to pay again for all the addons, I already spent enough money on MSFS 😅
Thanks for another great video, one question I had watching the taxi-in is: Is single engine taxi used on an A330? Or something like 2-engine taxi on an A340? Or are these birds simply to heavy?
There is a procedure for both. A330 is supposedly on engine 1 and A340 is with the 2 outer engines and blue elec pump on. Remember thrust is proportional to the weight……except for the A340-200/-300
Nice captain. Love the Toliss planes. I love msfs too but the planes and feeling always get me back in to xplane. Currently about 50/50 between the sims. Now get some ortho /autoortho and x-world europe and it will even look pretty nice. Its a bit of work but definitely worth if you are in for the long run. An xplane Installation is not allowed to be below 2TB of discspace ;-)
@@valet2972 Hope so.I know there was someone last year that was doing a freeware version but haven't heard anything recently. One of my fav long hauls in FSX and Prepar3d.
I just bought it 2 days ago with toliss a340. I usually fly the fenix and pmdg 737 in msfs. Yes the graphics are not up there but actual hand flying is so much better in xp
I have xp11 and xp12 and don't know what they did to xp12 but performance is awful. Id recon to roll back to xp11 and see huge performance increase. Awesome for VR. Also I'd use auto-ortho program for Xplane. Its awesome.
Emmanuel, great video, beautiful plane. Also, the guy who commented below is correct. If your running a 9900k than it is throttling down the performance of you 4090 hardcore and your sim. I would recommend updating to a i9-13900k and you will smash XPlane. Anyways, great video sir.
29:28 and the ladies and gents is why the XP simmers stick to this sim instead of MF flight graphics game. This feels real, you feel the mass and inertia. This is also very well modelled in the IXEG, and in XP, ground handling is great where MSFS is a major let down.
Lmao I def agree with you in that there’s not a lot of information on how to install plugins or addons to Xplane 12, there’s not a lot of guides or things that explain how things work you kinda just need to know how to handle mods
@@AtliJarlMartin MCDU is now somewhat usable, I'd say it's a little lower overall feeling than Aerosoft A330 (P3D version for compare) , but with less fatal bug (like the totally unflyable aerosoft FBW if you have any stutter), I'd say XP's one is more enjoyable than aerosoft in P3D.
@@majoraviatior1611 What is mentioning that there "no mcdu on initial release" has to do on its current status? That statement is misleading and ignores the fact that the MCDU was introduce in version 12.05b1 which was well know in the community that the initial release in 12.00 was not ready.
I wonder if the A330 from Aerosoft will be even close to this one in terms of everything as I am looking forward for it. I invested a lot in addons for XP11, but when MSFS came out, I had to abandon the XP platform simply because the engine and immersion look clearly too outdated unfortunately despite the tentative to make XP12 another gen...
The cockpit looks almost comically bad, like FS2004 freeware level bad. I know looks aren't everything, but it just gets hard to overlook it at this point. Especially for $89.99. Also, am I hallucinating or did it look much better in XP11?
@@animatedchristmascollector3754 physics are good, better than some planes in msfs but worse than the good ones in p3d. Some xplane planes handle like ass though.
Question regarding your type rating. Are you going to be able to fly the Neo variant of the 330 once you finish your type rating or is there additional training required for it? And if you do know anything about the Neo, are there any differences in it apart from the engines and winglets?
Many of the differences will come with what technology and system are in the cockpit. Airbus wanted the A330 to be able to work with some of the A350 systems like Runway Overrun Warning/Prevention, FMS Landing System, Back Up Speed Scale, TCAS Autopilot etc. some thing that weren’t available on the older generation. A HUD can be fitted as an option and an airport moving map if the airline chooses
@@peter-mv5gk Well he, says the Fenix handles like shit and as such is worthless for him as soon type rated A330 pilot. So why bother ever touching the Fenix if one has the Toliss A340, apart from the Fenix probably getting more viewers being part of a much more popular flightsim.
@@kiekiekhe’s totally wrong on that. I completely disagree fenix handles like a joy. V1 simulations that a a320 captain with over 10k hours under his belt disagreed to him aswell
@@kiekiek well apart of that a real a320 pilot (namely v1 simulations) said that its as good as the toliss in most of the time flight situations...emmanuel is no a320 captain and is focused on a completely different plane😂...i dont know why you come with the fenix
@@henriklmao But systems are much more complex there then the jar design which is a plane I would of flown 16 years ago on fsx when I was 5 just for fun. It’s a horrid plane
Excellent plane, best Systems and flight dynamics. Graphics aren't everything, you know? What some others do in graphics they lack in flight dynamics. There just is no "good" Airbus Addon that does it all.
![เปิดใจ “ต้นหอม ศกุนตลา” หลังโดนพาดพิงธุรกิจที่เคยทำ และผลกระทบทำถูกปลดฟ้าผ่า! | แฉ 24 ต.ค.67 [2/3]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/vCi5OIqlxaE/mqdefault.jpg)
If you're trying out X-plane stuff I would highly recommend giving the Challenger 650 by Hot Start a go. One of (if the not the most) detailed and comprehensive add ons for any sim and an incredibly satisfying experience. I mostly use MSFS I but the Challenger calls me back regularly :)
Agree. The A2A Comanche is not that far behind but definitely the CL650 by HS is unmatched
@@Sebastiangf320 They aren't even close dude. The CL60 is levels above any add on that exists at the moment.
@@activex7327 *shrug* we all value things differently. I personally value the depth of the physical systems and the avionics more, and for me they more than make up for the fact visually it doesn’t look as good as the best stuff in msfs or whatever.
Worth every penny as far as I’m concerned.
Thank you very much again for this great video Captain. I really appreciated your demonstration and feedbacks.
Danke!
Wie geil, auch noch mal auf Deutsch wie es sich gehört. :) Der ToLiss ist echt schick, hab auch schon länger auf deine Meinung dazu gewartet.
Thank you for doing the flight from the first officer side. I always alternate the views when I sim. 😊I also go back and forth C/FO, depending on what is being done.
Toliss has random failures enabled by default, so the Wing Anti-Ice was probably indeed failed. You can turn them off in the Toliss menu. Also to get the Cabin Ready you need to push the FWD Calls button both on takeoff on landing.
On newer Toliss versions: Cabin Ready will eventually appear. You can force it by pressing the calls. This is to simulate the attendants not having yet acknowledged or perhaps forgot to contact. The random failures are nice BUT the default frequency isn't realistic imo. 1-4 failures on avg for a 1hr flight? Granted, maybe 2 of those are advisory and 2 will probably be reset only. I.E Gen 1 tripping offline. Reset will work, then SDAC 1 fail. That's advisory only since SDAC 2 remains op. The AMAZING thing about Toliss though is if you follow the real world FCOM procedure for this-resetting SDAC breakers..this clears the fault too! You can use the toliss menu if you want to cheat. Many failures are like this.
Absolutely love this! Can't wait to see more Airbus content in the future! 🤘
That's coming for sure!
There should be an update to the visuals on the A346 soon, since Toliss has done that to the rest of their lineup recently. It won't be up to the visual fidelity of MSFS but it will certainly be a huge upgrade over the current textures.
It seems that you are gonna spend a lot of money on aircraft for Xplane :D In Xplane 11 there also is Boeing 727 Boeing 737 classic and a lot more, which would be very interesting to see how you fly it, when they would get updated to xplane 12
For the butter pusback put the doawnloaded foulder inside of the plugin folder of x-plane 12 , once you find your x-plane folder here is the path towards the plugin folder
X-Plane 12\Resources\plugins
Hey Emmanuel, very nice Video :D The A340-600 is certainly one of the most impressive things in the skies out there! Looking into your Video description, I can see that your i9-9900K might be the culprit for your performance. Especially when paired with a 4090, the i9-9900K should be fairly maxed out. I'd recommend swapping it with a 12th or 13th Gen Intel Core or a Ryzen 7000 Series chip. Hope that helps.
Hello Emmanuel, in x plane you can set custom camera's by pressing ctrl+(any number on your number pad). This makes it easier to switch between your camera presets instead of spending time holding the arrow keys. Hope this help ya!
I am curious to compare ToLiss A320 and Fenix A320. btw I recommend the Hot Start Challenger 650 and Colimata-ConcordeV3
I'll do that comparison one day. Probably after the Fenix update is out, depending how long it takes.
Do more with this plane its my favorite
I absolutely will!
Great video, keep up the great work🎉🎉 liked this aircraft very much
I was going to recommend getting a Toliss aircraft for your type rating, Emi; I’ve been using the A320neo and although there are a couple of niggles, I think it’s really pretty systems accurate
wow another airplane with efb, incredible
very cool plane
Hi again, really nice to see your videos. I've noticed you've done the airbus FCOM briefing method, the problem is that it doesn't say when and how to brief the route and the SID chart. So you've saved the fpln but didn't brief it later on. I can't tell you what to do of course but it'd be cool next time you do a video flying the a320/30/40 aircraft you did a full briefing explaining these. Thanks a lot :)
Hi, this was the full briefing. I'll do videos explaining the "smarter briefing" As Airbus calls them.
They basically say "every Pilot can read a chart, so every Pilot can compare the flight plan to the chart themselves. No need to do that together. The briefing shall only be used to highlight the specials of the flight, not the standards that both pilots can check of their own".
@@A330Drivercool! Nice to hear that you'll do videos about it! Thanks for your answer, I've seen videos where they brief it together for things like the climb gradient and the route itself, that's why I've asked. Thanks :)
I've never seen that RADIAL IN you used in DIR TO. Mind blown...I usually put in a WAYPOINT/HEAD/DIST point... :)
Nice Video! Will you do a Livestream with the A340-600 in the next days?
Perhaps during the course of the week, quite busy with training these days.
I really hope they get round to updating the textures. They only just recently brought the 321 and 319 cockpit textures up to the 320neo standard so fingers crossed the 340 gets the same treatment sometime soon. That overhead panel texture alone makes me doubt the asking price. We’ve been spoilt with the quality of recent flight sim graphics
This aircraft will help me train up for the fbw 380 in msfs ;)
Great video, you should try the IXEG 737-300
Thanks! That one isn't compatible with XP12 yet, is it?
@@A330Driver Not yet, it's soon to be released
My fav plane I’m so glad your trying it. I’m looking to learn a lot from this
You'll get a full tutorial series in the style of my 737 tutorials for this for sure 😉
@@A330Driver that’s greatly appreciated. It’s an older module but it’s been really fun to learn and operate.
I'd like to welcome you to the world of Toliss Airbus :) Despite the shortcomings of X-Plane in the visual areas, those planes pretty good airplanes and often underrated or overlooked. You said it spot on: If you wanna have the best system simulation and flight dynamics then you are absolutely at the right place with Toliss and X-Plane. I hope however that Toliss will update the A340-600 to the latest A320Neo standards with working printer and updated cockpit texturing.
Rgds PC
Indeed an update to the Cockpit would be highly appreciated. However as you said for systems and flight dynamics it's great.
I have had this plane since it came out. It has been updated to XP12 and functionality added but visually as far as I can tell it’s the same just bug fixes. The cockpits are dark in both msfs and XP12 it’s probably a function of the lighting models they use. The ToLiss A320 Neo cockpit is superb and tbf as good as anything in msfs but it’s subjective. It would be nice to see the other ToLiss aircraft updated but tbh I’m just glad I get to fly the ToLiss Airbus aircraft. They are well made I carnt speak to the professional level that Emi can but as a ‘serious’ simmer I find them a challenge to learn and a joy to fly. I’m happy that we have both msfs and XP to enjoy aircraft in both. I’m looking forward to any in-depth tutorials as I’m sure I’m doing a lot wrong, but as you say you never stop learning in aviation it’s one of the things that I love bout it
The A346 is so sexy. We can only wish to see it in MSFS one day...
I think inibuilds are going to be working on one
Just getting my 737 type rating now after flying a heavy, and getting jealous you are getting one for the airbus haha.
What have you flown before?
The Airbus is certainly the simpler plane! The 737's nice as well though!
@@A330Driver Yup, it's a fun airplane though quite complex with its systems! I used to fly the 777, and it was actually much easier to learn.
Hello Emmanuel! Excellent video! Do you mind sharing your X-Plane 12 graphic settings, plugins, shaders, etc.? Thank you very much in advance. Greetings from Quito, Ecuador! ✈✈
Very happy to see you trying some excellent X-Plane aircraft
Nice video again. I really regret that there will not be a A330 of this quality for X-plane. Unfortunately the Aerosoft version of MSFS is not ready yet and Prepar3D dropped support for the latest version.
I agree with you, a good A330 is sooo needed!
Great video, thank you! Although they could probably reach more people by making this aircraft model for MSFS, I'm honestly glad that they made it for X-Plane. MSFS is great for looking at scenery. However the inability to set RVR and visibility or even high-priced add-ons (with wording "Fully customized system simulation for all major and minor aircraft systems and components." on their website) not having working weather radars (at least it's mentioned on the website albeit indirectly) etc. really keeps me from using MSFS more. Maybe I am biased but I really prefer X-Plane for simulation of IFR flying or for messing with aircraft (e.g. observing what a DC-3 would do with 30% more powerful engines or how would a Super Cub handle JATO rockets). MSFS on the other hand is great for simulating sightseeing flights - you don't have to setup scenery streaming or make your own orthoscenery like in X-Plane, it's already there.
As someone who starded flight simulations with MSFS, I would love to go to X-plane, but I don't want to pay again for all the addons, I already spent enough money on MSFS 😅
The things that I would give to fly this airplane in MSFS xD
Ohhhhh yes!
Thanks for another great video, one question I had watching the taxi-in is: Is single engine taxi used on an A330? Or something like 2-engine taxi on an A340? Or are these birds simply to heavy?
There is a procedure for both. A330 is supposedly on engine 1 and A340 is with the 2 outer engines and blue elec pump on. Remember thrust is proportional to the weight……except for the A340-200/-300
Hi, both single engine taxi in and out are possible.
Toliss is such a great developer a shame they dont have anything for msfs.
Fully agree!
Show us Lufthansa's amazing toilets down in the cargo hold. LOL
Wing anti-ice: could the pushback have broken it?
Nice captain. Love the Toliss planes. I love msfs too but the planes and feeling always get me back in to xplane. Currently about 50/50 between the sims.
Now get some ortho /autoortho and x-world europe and it will even look pretty nice. Its a bit of work but definitely worth if you are in for the long run.
An xplane Installation is not allowed to be below 2TB of discspace ;-)
Good grief... I'm going to need a bigger Flight Sim drive if I'm running both!
It’s a good aircraft!
Wish they had this in MSFS!!
Thell make it for msfs they Said
@@valet2972 Hope so.I know there was someone last year that was doing a freeware version but haven't heard anything recently. One of my fav long hauls in FSX and Prepar3d.
@@valet2972when? Never seen that comment and I follow ToLiss a lot
@@valet2972 I haven't seen anything about an A340 for MSFS. Do you have a link?
I was thinking of getting XP12 but i mostly play on msfs2020 with fenix a320
I just bought it 2 days ago with toliss a340. I usually fly the fenix and pmdg 737 in msfs. Yes the graphics are not up there but actual hand flying is so much better in xp
@@turkintheus33it’s not that much better anymore tbh. Ground handling is much better but flight handling? Nah.
@@animatedchristmascollector3754 ground handling is soo much better, toliss handles way better than fenix or fbw in the air in my opinion.
@@turkintheus33nah, toliss upon landing is pretty hard to land tbh. The nose drops down way to fast and is hard to butter
I have xp11 and xp12 and don't know what they did to xp12 but performance is awful. Id recon to roll back to xp11 and see huge performance increase. Awesome for VR. Also I'd use auto-ortho program for Xplane. Its awesome.
Same, I get better fps in mfs than xp12.
Emmanuel, great video, beautiful plane. Also, the guy who commented below is correct. If your running a 9900k than it is throttling down the performance of you 4090 hardcore and your sim. I would recommend updating to a i9-13900k and you will smash XPlane. Anyways, great video sir.
bell the fwd cabin for the check.
What are Engine Master Switches? I will bet you they are called differently at your new outfit. The devil is in the details when you fly LH 😮 😉
Lufthansa, the airline who forbids using the hud in the 787 lol.
No offense to LH tho, I love it
😂😂😂
Did I really just see you switch on ADR3 before ADR2? 😂
Hey I’m struggling with dark cockpit too. Where can I get the cockpit texture add on for aircrafts?
29:28 and the ladies and gents is why the XP simmers stick to this sim instead of MF flight graphics game. This feels real, you feel the mass and inertia. This is also very well modelled in the IXEG, and in XP, ground handling is great where MSFS is a major let down.
Lmao I def agree with you in that there’s not a lot of information on how to install plugins or addons to Xplane 12, there’s not a lot of guides or things that explain how things work you kinda just need to know how to handle mods
Can’t wait for msfs a330 ceo to come out
I'm eagerly awaiting it as well!
Get the landing rate plug-in!!!
Almost every plugin goes into xplane/resources/plugins :) The folder itself not the contents
how you liking xplane graphics no were near msfs but realism is exellent whats your opinion?
I am expanding my Sim world into X-Plane 12 just because of the A340 and B757. How is the default A330 in XP12?
It’s pretty bad. There was no mcdu on initial release that’s all you need to know
@@majoraviatior1611 Oof, okay. But that's fine, MSFS has options there.
@@AtliJarlMartin MCDU is now somewhat usable, I'd say it's a little lower overall feeling than Aerosoft A330 (P3D version for compare) , but with less fatal bug (like the totally unflyable aerosoft FBW if you have any stutter), I'd say XP's one is more enjoyable than aerosoft in P3D.
@@umi3017 Thank you!
@@majoraviatior1611 What is mentioning that there "no mcdu on initial release" has to do on its current status? That statement is misleading and ignores the fact that the MCDU was introduce in version 12.05b1 which was well know in the community that the initial release in 12.00 was not ready.
Nice. Could you try the FF A350?
Didn’t know the speed vector in 10 seconds 😂
As they say "the day you feel you don't learn anything anymore in aviation is the day you should retire"
I wonder if the A330 from Aerosoft will be even close to this one in terms of everything as I am looking forward for it. I invested a lot in addons for XP11, but when MSFS came out, I had to abandon the XP platform simply because the engine and immersion look clearly too outdated unfortunately despite the tentative to make XP12 another gen...
The cockpit looks almost comically bad, like FS2004 freeware level bad. I know looks aren't everything, but it just gets hard to overlook it at this point. Especially for $89.99.
Also, am I hallucinating or did it look much better in XP11?
they began updating cockpit visuals and sounds, 319, 320 and 321 were updated, 340 is probably the last to get the update among other ToLiss aircraft
That's just xplane addons. They sell mediocre but not bad systems with fsx default modelling and fs9 textures at the price of a pmdg plane...
it looks better in xp11
@@henriklmaobut with good physics
@@animatedchristmascollector3754 physics are good, better than some planes in msfs but worse than the good ones in p3d. Some xplane planes handle like ass though.
Question regarding your type rating.
Are you going to be able to fly the Neo variant of the 330 once you finish your type rating or is there additional training required for it? And if you do know anything about the Neo, are there any differences in it apart from the engines and winglets?
Many of the differences will come with what technology and system are in the cockpit. Airbus wanted the A330 to be able to work with some of the A350 systems like Runway Overrun Warning/Prevention, FMS Landing System, Back Up Speed Scale, TCAS Autopilot etc. some thing that weren’t available on the older generation. A HUD can be fitted as an option and an airport moving map if the airline chooses
hi! is the FRAX3 in the Navigraph database?
Is that actually standart procedure in the A340 to put the F infront of your flex temp? I thought it was just toliss coding weird stuff.
It’s because on some Airbus planes you can derate instead of flex. So to derate you would enter D instead of F
@@tomstravels520 thank you for the response. I actually didn't knew that, since I'm only truly used to the a320 family.
It is popular as Pencil. 😅
Are you allowed to tell what airline you're gonna work for?
I think it’s euro wings
xplane or p3d aerosoft a330
I really want to enjoy xplane but the immersion just ruins it for me. Looks like 2002
My god Xplane still looks like it's decades old.
toliss great systems, poor Cockpit models n textures..
Don‘t tell us you would prefer the opposite?
haha lol with gear on TO
😂
Bye Bye Fenix A320?
No?
would you say the a320 is the same as the a340?
@@peter-mv5gk Well he, says the Fenix handles like shit and as such is worthless for him as soon type rated A330 pilot. So why bother ever touching the Fenix if one has the Toliss A340, apart from the Fenix probably getting more viewers being part of a much more popular flightsim.
@@kiekiekhe’s totally wrong on that. I completely disagree fenix handles like a joy. V1 simulations that a a320 captain with over 10k hours under his belt disagreed to him aswell
@@kiekiek well apart of that a real a320 pilot (namely v1 simulations) said that its as good as the toliss in most of the time flight situations...emmanuel is no a320 captain and is focused on a completely different plane😂...i dont know why you come with the fenix
You should give the JAR A330 for X-Plane a try given that’s what you’re going for
Horrid plane...
I would personnally not recommand the Jar A330 because it has very low system depth and many features are not simulated.
Headwind a330 is much better
@@animatedchristmascollector3754 headwind is not even an a330. It's an a320 with a330 model and some strings changed.
@@henriklmao But systems are much more complex there then the jar design which is a plane I would of flown 16 years ago on fsx when I was 5 just for fun. It’s a horrid plane
Horrible plane. This is a far cry from an actual A346, looks pale and plastic.
And where is the A340-600 for MSFS? If they made it look too good people would complain it’s giving them poor FPS
Excellent plane, best Systems and flight dynamics. Graphics aren't everything, you know? What some others do in graphics they lack in flight dynamics. There just is no "good" Airbus Addon that does it all.
@@A330Driverwhat about fslabs and P3d fully modded? It looks great and handles like a real Airbus to
@@tomstravels520 are you stupid?
Why is everybodys xplaine looking kinda good but mine on max settings looks like absolute trash