Yeah, it may be an implicit function. But what is the goal? Are there any goals really? Of humanity that is. Safety shelter food etc. Everything else is tittilation.
this isn't true surely? Many levels of the fitness hierarchy discard individual competence for collective competence to the point the individual and it's individual competence doesn't categorically exist in isolate in any meaningful sense. That is, evolution selects for incompetence too depending on your point of view.
I totally agree. If the world plunged into an every man for themselves situation due to famine from climate change or a nuclear war, I don't think professors from Yale would be getting a look in with the ladies any time soon. Even now, intelligence beyond a certain point is maladaptive.
But as you get down to the smaller inner workings, eventually every cell is an individual and has a level of competence it needs to survive. This adds to him saying that just because cells have set things to achieve, the acting out of this does not always amount to a working collective competence
This kinda connects free will to machine learning, where metabolic constraints can be seen as computational resources... the idea that free will is a corollary of agency under constraints is extremely interesting.
I Don't see the connection with free will. I understand that with any system be it biological or hardware that there will be limitations. However, the question with free will is can we model it sufficiently to fool ourselves that we are talking to one of us.
I think you are right. Besides when you think about it, highly competent people adversary's are other highly competent people. Also friends, but you get the idea.
My favorite example of this is how we all evolved with different IQ, people with lower IQ make more mistakes, which suggest people with higher IQ don’t, which is the case. And not surprisingly their higher competency rewards them with more wealth at a high correlation rate. I wish the video was more about what the title suggests.
That is the most ludicrously simplified nonsense I've ever read. Plus the fact that IQ beyond a certain level is probably maladaptive. Very High IQ might make you great a math and physics but you'd be highly incompetent in many other situations especially social.
@@robertpirsig5011 it’s only nonsense if you’re uneducated on the IQ or delusional. If IQ becomes maladaptive at a certain point, what about before that point? IQ basically correlates with how well you can problem solve. How does that not equate to being more competent? IQ measure how good you are at many things; not just math or physics. The only thing you got right is that someone who’s a genius can be incompetent in other areas. The famous example is Einstein who couldn’t even drive a car. With that said, you’re close to completely ignorant on the subject. you’re trying to correct me, but then use words like might and probably. Do you just enjoy talking out of your ass?
This is possibly a description of Societal formation. Possibly a rational for Faith. Liberating and terrifying to transpose these observations as fractal analogies that appear in all organ-izations. 🫀🧠🫁
What I really like about Lex is that he lets the interviewee speak without interrupting constantly. It shows humility and a natural curiosity.
I agree, but he's always dressed for a funeral.
@@robertpirsig5011 ha ha
As a Floridian watching this I can tell you the yellow guy has a good workin brain
What’s crazy is this was my thought exactly 😂
As a Virginian I concur. He smart
Illinois checking in, we know more than these guys combined. Pure child's play. just kidding we dumb over here
It’s funny how Americans feel the need to show they can perceive intelligence, because on average they cannot
Wearing a yellow shirt increases IQ by 50%. Just no one likes wearing them because it's "lame".
This guy illustrates super symmetry perfectly.
Don't be silly, he smart, but he ain't no board walk model.
🐐 convo
This guy is awesome
Yeah and he's got a bee on his shirt! Bees rock
David Sloan Wilson's multilevel selection theory with an engineering rebranding?
This guy is the perfect Morty!
All men are created equal in the sense that evolution has determined that they have a right to live.
That prob makes more sense.
very interesting fella
Just say abstract thoughts, and you're "special "
Lex is Ahead.
Agreed
SO GOOD!!
Okay!!!!
More efficiently we get replaced, better is the collective.
Yeah, it may be an implicit function. But what is the goal? Are there any goals really? Of humanity that is. Safety shelter food etc. Everything else is tittilation.
It looks like replacement when in reality its all the same stuff
this isn't true surely? Many levels of the fitness hierarchy discard individual competence for collective competence to the point the individual and it's individual competence doesn't categorically exist in isolate in any meaningful sense. That is, evolution selects for incompetence too depending on your point of view.
I totally agree. If the world plunged into an every man for themselves situation due to famine from climate change or a nuclear war, I don't think professors from Yale would be getting a look in with the ladies any time soon. Even now, intelligence beyond a certain point is maladaptive.
But as you get down to the smaller inner workings, eventually every cell is an individual and has a level of competence it needs to survive. This adds to him saying that just because cells have set things to achieve, the acting out of this does not always amount to a working collective competence
I have to add it’s an interesting way of putting it though, if cells didn’t work all together, all of the time, it’s amazing anything develops at all.
@@thediggg5499 , look at the electron transport system, a perfect example
WINNNINGGG
Elaborate further
Hi
Bye
Cry?
Isn’t robot cancer a glitch? Or the reason patches are needed because another designer found vulnerability in your application to exploit
Evolution. That's up there with Santa clause & the Easter bunny
"The Ends Justify the Means" - Literally every politician
Too many politicians and "leaders".. thank God not all.
what possibilities he is talking about
This kinda connects free will to machine learning, where metabolic constraints can be seen as computational resources... the idea that free will is a corollary of agency under constraints is extremely interesting.
Kinda simple though isn't it?
I Don't see the connection with free will. I understand that with any system be it biological or hardware that there will be limitations. However, the question with free will is can we model it sufficiently to fool ourselves that we are talking to one of us.
- Natural selection, as it has operated in human history, favors not only the clever but the murderous.
Barbara Ehrenreich: 1941 - 2022
True
Not cancer, viruses.
Elaborate further
I also don't know what shape I am.
Robots don't get cancer. Thanks Genius.
Phds are kek
@@chrisbarry9345 I want to defend.
They can short circuit though.
Блин, сколько нас умных там
Stop your fawning
@@robertpirsig5011 shouldn't you be more Zen and motorcycle?
"empirically useful", not "empirical".
I'm a prenatal genetic scientist.
Can I talk to you in person Lex along with Joe Rogan?
Up
Nepotism, Cronyism and Favouritism enter the chat
I think you are right. Besides when you think about it, highly competent people adversary's are other highly competent people. Also friends, but you get the idea.
Good stuff. Finally western stuff is catching up
What do you mean?
@@TheLochs meaning western sciences and way of thinking has reached a plateau and is finally starting to merge
Competency in what? Stephen hawking can unlock physics but he wouldn't last long in the UFC.
Is Lex a clone of Charlie Sheen?
"Evolution" is the shortest joke ever..
Peter Principle 🤡
Explain?
My favorite example of this is how we all evolved with different IQ, people with lower IQ make more mistakes, which suggest people with higher IQ don’t, which is the case. And not surprisingly their higher competency rewards them with more wealth at a high correlation rate. I wish the video was more about what the title suggests.
- It has yet to be proved that intelligence has any survival value.
ARTHUR C. CLARKE
That is the most ludicrously simplified nonsense I've ever read. Plus the fact that IQ beyond a certain level is probably maladaptive. Very High IQ might make you great a math and physics but you'd be highly incompetent in many other situations especially social.
@@youtuber5305there has to be something I don’t get about that statement, because that has to be the most illogical thing I’ve heard in years.
@@robertpirsig5011 it’s only nonsense if you’re uneducated on the IQ or delusional. If IQ becomes maladaptive at a certain point, what about before that point? IQ basically correlates with how well you can problem solve. How does that not equate to being more competent? IQ measure how good you are at many things; not just math or physics. The only thing you got right is that someone who’s a genius can be incompetent in other areas. The famous example is Einstein who couldn’t even drive a car. With that said, you’re close to completely ignorant on the subject. you’re trying to correct me, but then use words like might and probably. Do you just enjoy talking out of your ass?
@@FearlessP4P1 Many are smart. Few are truly responsible.
Ask any divorce lawyer what HE thinks.
Hierarchies of competence. Jordan Peterson
Guy is wired 😂
He's got a bee in his bonnet....
This is possibly a description of Societal formation. Possibly a rational for Faith. Liberating and terrifying to transpose these observations as fractal analogies that appear in all organ-izations. 🫀🧠🫁
I can’t believe that this guy is 53 years old 😮😆🤭😧
He def doesn’t look close to that
He looks like a tired and overworked 35 year old