Dance to the Tune of Life lecture. 2016

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 9

  • @PACratt
    @PACratt 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Prof. Denis Noble, I believe you deserve recognition for all of your work towards human understanding of life.
    Life - What a Gift :-} I am grateful for it, the little bit of “it” that I inhabit out of the “entire Universe” :-}
    Therefore:
    Thank You Denis - Sir - for sharing your extremely important Insights and Understandings. I truly enjoyed your podcast with Andréa Morris on Variable Minds. And now enjoying this Lecture as well. This is truly clear and understandable. {-: Exceptional :-}
    Peter A. Couture
    a.k.a. :-} PACratt {-:

  • @ShireTasker
    @ShireTasker หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you Denis

  • @andrewjinks7546
    @andrewjinks7546 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A wonderful lecture, thank you so much. :)

  • @annakarl9989
    @annakarl9989 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hello Sir,
    Thank you very much for sharing 💖💝.

  • @monkerud2108
    @monkerud2108 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Slay, queen:). Its obvious isn't it, if there are acquired characteristics that are inherited, and are directed in any way, they must effect selection and therefore must habe long term effects on inheritance even if the epigenetic change is just single generation, otherwise how could the mechanism for it have evolved. Very interested in perhaps genetic directed change as well, those mechanisms could evolve by the same principle as well, at least in principle, i'm a big ignoramus in the field. But its great to have people like you around to talk about the subject. Looking forward to learning more about it.

  • @notanemoprog
    @notanemoprog หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great stuff!

  • @naeemjan64
    @naeemjan64 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What is the role of the blood testes barrier because there is atleast some scientufic evidence for its presence.

  • @assemblyofsilence
    @assemblyofsilence หลายเดือนก่อน

    Do stochastic permutations repeat genetic coding that prove to be ineffective? If not, would it not be reasonable to say they are not truly random?

  • @monkerud2108
    @monkerud2108 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Its obvious that it must have happened in evolutionary history for that reason, if it didn't the directedness would have to be magic. Functions dont just pop up out of nowhere, they develop on a gradient, there must have been advantage in epigenetic directed change, and other dna altering mechanisms could just as well have evolved in simple bacteria as well, or acrea, and standardised in simple forms with loada of redundancy. It might even be necessary for the kind of redundancy needed for complex life. So what about those first billion years? Maybe developing just these sorts of mechanisms to regulate evolution was the only way to get beyond single celled organisms, and eventually produce an explosion of complexity.