It's GREAT that people can understand all this. It's rocket science to me. I can recite lots of this stuff from memory - Why you want to use aux tracks & bussing, etc. ...but actually DOING IT? Ha-ha! LOST. I just put plug-ins on each track. It's bad, I guess - but I don't record enough to understand all this stuff. It's nice that people take time to explain & try to help others - and I see that lots of people get it. Maybe I will, eventually... Have fun!
Hi. You have a good clear and concise way of talking that makes you a good teacher. I find that many knowledgable people who make youtube tutorials for Pro Tools and other things, tire me out early because I waste a lot of energy just trying to hear what they are saying between the pauses, the umm...s and so on. Kudos to you for being well spoken, articulate and for having a good manor. ~ I am new to Pro Tools specifically and today, thanks to you, I have a nice understanding of how aux sends are created in Pro Tools, which was what I set out to learn. Thanks for taking the time to do this. I don't know what "ThePureMix" is yet. I don't know if you get paid some how, but I do thank you . I will subscribe and hopefully I can learn much about working in Pro Tools from you.
Even with compression? If youre turning down some peaks you wouldnt want the dry signals with the peaks entact over the top right? or am i missing something. thanks for the help.
i know this doesnt have to do with the video (which i found extremely helpful and well done even as a cubase user) but where did you get those rack cases? they are beautiful
Hi i have a question please. When you sent the snare to the reverb channel you left the output of the reverb as 1-2 rather than going back to the drums submix. So now if you change the level of the drums submix, the reverb level won't change along with it? is there a way to make the reverb level change along with the drums submix so the reverb level is consistant?
I didn’t like that either. Why wouldn’t you want reverb on the other drums? He could have created a second send for all the drum tracks to the reverb abs at least have two send controls to balance. But preferably he could have just sent the drum group itself to the reverb. Then he could control the level to the reverb at the same time he adjusted the group level, provided he did the send Post Fader.
Hi Ben, hope you are doing well. Can you please tell me how can I listen only to the effect inserted to an aux track? For example, if I have an aux track for the reverb (100% wet), Can I mute the source track but keep listening only to the reverb? I couldn´t find how to do it yet. Thanks!
Thanks for the answer. If I do that I won´t be able to listen the reberv with the pluggins applied to the source track, right? Recently I found a way that is sending the source track to a non used output (ej.: a bus not used). Thanks!
But when you route those via the main output of the track then it's post fader and when you compress The audio on the aux and by chance pull the faders on the individual tracks down that's going to affect the level of compression on the aux , how to over ride that ?
When we send all the tracks to a subgroup does it create a double of each sound? Because when I do this in Reaper it seems like im getting the output sound for all the original tracks plus the output sounds in the group track. Which means when i add a reverb on the sub group track i now have the original sounds come through with an additional reverbed sound on top of it. Am i doing it wrong?
I did mean that definition of the word 'win'; but it's definitely a noun, too (as the same meaning as 'victory'); although it's more commonly known/used as a verb.
Hey when turn down the volume on the group I still hear the reverb that I have on a specific sound. . Is that normal or is it leaking ? Do I send that aux through the group also or do I out it directly in the track inserts
THere's a much quicker way of creating bus and routing your tracks to it: Just select all your your drums for example, shift+alt click on the output and click on new track. It will create the bus, rename it and do all the routing in one go.
one thing that I find to be very painful in Pro Tools is soloing subgroups. Do you have any quick tips to do that without having to group every channel every time you make a new subgroup, selecting the group and soloing it? It's extremely time consuming (and pointless in my opinion) compared to other DAWs...
what if I want a guitar hard panned to the left for example, and the reverb hard panned to the left as well. And then a guitar panned to the right 100%, and the reverb 100% right also. I tried sometimes but the reverb bleeds to the other side.
Except "win" (I assume you are referring to "win" as in "winning" or "winner") is a verb not a noun so they would not be used in the same context. ...at all.
Still, then... that's a completely different context; not to mention the capitalisation... Although, I assume you were joking initially so I don't mean to argue...
Sooooo simple. Thank youuuu 🙌😩
thank you for the kind words.
@@PuremixAudioTutorials Yeah it was so simple thanks dear
Straight to the point, easy to follow, no unnecessary talking. Perfect tutorial, thanks!
This video is a must see for ALL Pro Tools Users.
10 yrs later he still saving people. What a man
It's GREAT that people can understand all this. It's rocket science to me. I can recite lots of this stuff from memory - Why you want to use aux tracks & bussing, etc. ...but actually DOING IT? Ha-ha! LOST. I just put plug-ins on each track. It's bad, I guess - but I don't record enough to understand all this stuff. It's nice that people take time to explain & try to help others - and I see that lots of people get it. Maybe I will, eventually... Have fun!
it really isnt difficult ...lol, i hope u are there by now ....peace
Perfect, to the point, no bs, just the information need. Also clearly spoken and zero ranting. These types of videos are gems. Thank you.
This helped me out a bind; thank you for posting (all those years ago)!
Hi. You have a good clear and concise way of talking that makes you a good teacher. I find that many knowledgable people who make youtube tutorials for Pro Tools and other things, tire me out early because I waste a lot of energy just trying to hear what they are saying between the pauses, the umm...s and so on. Kudos to you for being well spoken, articulate and for having a good manor. ~ I am new to Pro Tools specifically and today, thanks to you, I have a nice understanding of how aux sends are created in Pro Tools, which was what I set out to learn. Thanks for taking the time to do this. I don't know what "ThePureMix" is yet. I don't know if you get paid some how, but I do thank you . I will subscribe and hopefully I can learn much about working in Pro Tools from you.
The Best guy ever explaining 🙏🏼
I love how concise this was
this is so helpful! thank you. feeling like im finally getting a grip on the two
Very very informative! Simple and to the point!
And I finally understood this after a month reading about it. Thank you so much man.
good shit bro. Im going to be engineering with producers Cool and Dre and I am super
excited. Came to refreshen my knowledge. good stuff brother
10 years later great video good quality
PERFECT TUTORIAL BRO! Thank you!
Very helpful video.Clear and concise without any extraneous information.Thanks for sharing your knowledge freely!
Thanks dude! I finally get aux tracks now. And your video was simple enough that I could take notes for later use.
Thanks Ben you ROCK! i love your tutorials.
Just poppin' in to say: I like the production quality of your videos, and am impressed with the quality of the organization of your mixes.
Thanks Ben, you explain things so easy! Thanks for taking the time to help people!
Thanks very much for this - very detailed, straightforward and informative.
There's a reason there are no "dislikes" on this vid. Well done sir, well done!
Thank you very much bro! loved your explanation!
Very good tutorial! Straight and to the point no fluff. Much appreciated i subscribers
Very well explained, suscribed.
Thanks for this. Great job at explaining the difference and when to use which one.
Very easy to understand! Thank You
awesome, been meaning to learn aux tracks for a while. Thanks!
Thanks for the simple explanation, tis confusing with all the shiny buttons! Thanks again Seth Rogen.
thank you for this organized and helpful video!
awesome can't wait till Sunday to test it out
directly to the point, bless you
Perfect tutorial
best tutorial on sends, thanks.
You are GREAT!!! Thanks for the tutorial!
Thanks Ben. Really helpful.
Hello children ! Thanks for this video, very helpful to me !
Even with compression? If youre turning down some peaks you wouldnt want the dry signals with the peaks entact over the top right? or am i missing something. thanks for the help.
god bless your soul for this video my guy
Great video. You explained everything very well sir. Very helpful and thanks so much!
Thank you I needed the refresher
This was very helpful. You did an excellent job. Thanks so much!
Great video thanks very much.
On the effects sends, shouldnt you enable the FMP button, I notice the main is panned which means the reverb will not follow the panned main.... ?
This is the great instruction. Thank you so much :)
very nice thanks. i am recording myself on steelpan. any ideas or suggestions for me? i tried all the dverb options but not loving any of them much.
i know this doesnt have to do with the video (which i found extremely helpful and well done even as a cubase user) but where did you get those rack cases? they are beautiful
Awesome tutorial
Nice lecture, i really learnt a lot. Thanks
Yep. I subscribed.
Thanks for sharing vidio 👍 simple
ur a great person , u rock
Thank you..Now if you wanted to make a mix of those drums and record is as 1 stereo track in the session how would you do it? Thanks
THANK YOU
This is very helpful thank you!!
happy if it helps!!
Awesome! Thanks a ton!
this really helped me, thanks a lot !
Finally understood that. LOL. Thank you!
Hi i have a question please. When you sent the snare to the reverb channel you left the output of the reverb as 1-2 rather than going back to the drums submix. So now if you change the level of the drums submix, the reverb level won't change along with it? is there a way to make the reverb level change along with the drums submix so the reverb level is consistant?
I didn’t like that either. Why wouldn’t you want reverb on the other drums? He could have created a second send for all the drum tracks to the reverb abs at least have two send controls to balance. But preferably he could have just sent the drum group itself to the reverb. Then he could control the level to the reverb at the same time he adjusted the group level, provided he did the send Post Fader.
thank you!
GREETINGS FROM CHILE THANK YOU VERY MOUCH
THANK YOU!
Esto es hacer un excelente tutorial!!! Nice Vid!!!
keep em comin please
thanks
May I know if I can just select Solo on the aux to solo the whole aux bus members rather than selecting the track one by one?
Gracias.
Hi Ben, hope you are doing well. Can you please tell me how can I listen only to the effect inserted to an aux track? For example, if I have an aux track for the reverb (100% wet), Can I mute the source track but keep listening only to the reverb? I couldn´t find how to do it yet.
Thanks!
Thanks for the answer. If I do that I won´t be able to listen the reberv with the pluggins applied to the source track, right? Recently I found a way that is sending the source track to a non used output (ej.: a bus not used). Thanks!
I call that bus "Blackhole" ;)
thanks bro
But when you route those via the main output of the track then it's post fader and when you compress The audio on the aux and by chance pull the faders on the individual tracks down that's going to affect the level of compression on the aux , how to over ride that ?
thanks for the help
When we send all the tracks to a subgroup does it create a double of each sound? Because when I do this in Reaper it seems like im getting the output sound for all the original tracks plus the output sounds in the group track. Which means when i add a reverb on the sub group track i now have the original sounds come through with an additional reverbed sound on top of it. Am i doing it wrong?
I did mean that definition of the word 'win'; but it's definitely a noun, too (as the same meaning as 'victory'); although it's more commonly known/used as a verb.
Hey when turn down the volume on the group I still hear the reverb that I have on a specific sound. . Is that normal or is it leaking ? Do I send that aux through the group also or do I out it directly in the track inserts
It's much easier to describe them that way. Even manuals, specifications, etc use mac and pc to describe each.
THere's a much quicker way of creating bus and routing your tracks to it:
Just select all your your drums for example, shift+alt click on the output and click on new track.
It will create the bus, rename it and do all the routing in one go.
one thing that I find to be very painful in Pro Tools is soloing subgroups. Do you have any quick tips to do that without having to group every channel every time you make a new subgroup, selecting the group and soloing it? It's extremely time consuming (and pointless in my opinion) compared to other DAWs...
thx bro
how to use compression with auxes ?
Nice video. Can you bus yourself through a send with a plugin that alters your lisp and articulation of words?
thats cool.
So how do I rename the bus on a Mac. I can't figure it out. I'd like to do that though. Anyone?
After you create Input Bus and then 2 fingers click(Right Click on mouse), you will see so you can Rename it. Hope this will help.
thanks ,,
beast
I have an assigment and i dont want to feel silly by asking my instructors they need some files saved in 2 and some in 1. What does that mean
what if I want a guitar hard panned to the left for example, and the reverb hard panned to the left as well. And then a guitar panned to the right 100%, and the reverb 100% right also. I tried sometimes but the reverb bleeds to the other side.
***** THANK YOU
Except "win" (I assume you are referring to "win" as in "winning" or "winner") is a verb not a noun so they would not be used in the same context. ...at all.
$weet & $imple, great stuff
WHAT'S THE CLICK BUTTON???? I DONT SEE A BUTTON ON MY KEYBOARD THAT GOES BY THAT NAME.... OH YEAH THANKS ALOT PAL... YOUR VIDS ARE GOOD
👍💯😁💰🙏🏾
Still, then... that's a completely different context; not to mention the capitalisation... Although, I assume you were joking initially so I don't mean to argue...
Why not just call them 'Mac' and 'Win'?
I actually read an article the other day that referred to Macs as 'PCs' and it kinda threw me off..LOL
because 'win' could easily be confused with the word 'win'
lol… all the “sweet” analog gear (random) behind you !? come on 😂
Is this guys skin real? Wow so sooth. I'm not gay but jeez. Oh by the way thanks for the tutorial.
dude baked af
Why do people separate Macintosh as 'Mac' and call Windows a 'PC'; Macintosh are PCs too. In fact, Macintosh were the first PCs, no?
Yo, um, I know that, dude... I think you misinterpreted my comment...
thanks