Tije's Transparent Portafilter clip3

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ก.ค. 2024
  • Tije de Jong made this Transparant Portafilter. Here are a few first extractions with it. Sometimes at the end when the pressure drops (backflush) the puck expands surprisingly. Also, it seems a firm and level tamp helps a lot to get a delicious extraction, at least in this test setup.
  • ภาพยนตร์และแอนิเมชัน

ความคิดเห็น • 176

  • @slayga
    @slayga 3 ปีที่แล้ว +101

    Someone needs to send James Hoffmann one of these

    • @Areys96
      @Areys96 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes please!!!

    • @neisahn
      @neisahn 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Definitely

  • @rickstokes2239
    @rickstokes2239 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Love this. A clear, bottomless portafilter should be where every espresso beginner starts. It takes all of the details to be right to get that perfect pour!

    • @palefire
      @palefire  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks!

  • @yogi9631
    @yogi9631 4 ปีที่แล้ว +67

    nice !!
    seing is believing,
    best video on coffee extraction and what REALLY happens!!

    • @palefire
      @palefire  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you!

    • @thefatmoop
      @thefatmoop 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I know right? Who would've thought it gets wet

    • @palefire
      @palefire  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@thefatmoop you live and learn!

  • @thanhnamnguyen5280
    @thanhnamnguyen5280 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I think the point about tamping is situational. The distance between the puck and the shower screen is quite far comparing to the regular double or even triple basket (not to mention single on some machine). That distance means the water has more chance to build momentum and dig into the puck, and it can do it for longer (until the water fill the basket and become pressurized). This is not to say this video is bad. It's great actually. Pretty impressed seeing the reaction of the puck to pressure and gas.
    P/s: i mean the tamp dont need to be extra firm or light, but tamping to get the puck stay even through the extraction is always a good idea

    • @palefire
      @palefire  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanh Nam Nguyen thankyou! I agree about the dustance.

  • @MrTeal888
    @MrTeal888 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Ok now I want a transparent basket.

  • @spiritofe629
    @spiritofe629 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I never knew what actually happened before I saw this video. Thanks for making this video.

    • @palefire
      @palefire  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you very much for your kind remark!

  • @sogcezar
    @sogcezar 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you 🙏 so much...I can’t wait to show it to my son, he loves coffee ☕️ as well.

    • @palefire
      @palefire  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you! Best wishes!!

  • @Gk2003m
    @Gk2003m ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome work. De-mystifies the whole process. Shows what works and what doesn’t, shows also that what some believe might have been ‘channeling’ to be merely gas escaping. Also - though it does not show it explicitly - lets you know what occurs during pre-infusion.

  • @brekel42
    @brekel42 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I love this.
    Although lower so not identical to a normal portafilter, it makes the process visible and answers some questions I've seen debated on various forums.
    Gives a great insight to what's happening during the shot.

  • @troymr1519
    @troymr1519 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Great Video. Thank you so much.

    • @palefire
      @palefire  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank YOU!

  • @batkovan
    @batkovan 5 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    Wow that clears some myths up - like that the coffee swells at the beggining and when it does it touches the screen and causes uneven extraction- now we see that the swelling occurs when the extraction stops.

    • @palefire
      @palefire  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks!

    • @nikapls
      @nikapls 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Makes sense because why would something swell under pressure.

    • @vandoren156
      @vandoren156 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      not exactly, it can swell at the beginning but it depends how you are preinfusing, if the shot goes directly into being under pressure then the puck is not allowed to swell like it would if it was preinfused without overhead pressure. (there should be the video of the lever too)
      Point is that people say that coffee does this and that and tend to assume thats valid for every machine in every condition when reality is that if you change what the machine does, the coffee reacts differently. And you shouldnt always do preinfusion for everything and everytime, depends on the coffee.

  • @saltrocklamp199
    @saltrocklamp199 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wow, this is amazing! It would be really interesting to see the comparison with and without a metal puck screen on top, and/or a paper filter on the bottom.

    • @palefire
      @palefire  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thankyou! We did this work nearly 10 years ago and I agree that more can be done. Hopefully a next 'generation' will do that!

  • @jamesnettleton68
    @jamesnettleton68 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I believe what i see,i see good advice.This is what i would expect to see,with the firm and level tamp.This really is the best,i personally have found.Thanks for reinforcing,what i believe to.

    • @palefire
      @palefire  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you James!

  • @yimemimena8656
    @yimemimena8656 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is very cool 😎🙌

  • @coffeemocoriginal
    @coffeemocoriginal 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    It was great to see this

    • @palefire
      @palefire  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you!

  • @neenosan4481
    @neenosan4481 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you very much for the informative video and the experimentation

    • @palefire
      @palefire  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      thank you for your kind words!

  • @alexkreyn315
    @alexkreyn315 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    What coffee do you use?

  • @chadgregory9037
    @chadgregory9037 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    interesting question.... the vibe pump seems to be micro-"stroking" the puck...,wonder how that effects extraction vs a rotary pump

  • @rustOfunk
    @rustOfunk 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Very cool, Frans. Exotic sports cars and espresso. You are a man of great taste. Literally :)

    • @palefire
      @palefire  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks! It's my neighbour who has the spectacular car, but I enjoy the view ;-)

  • @beachdays561
    @beachdays561 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A better representation of a naked portafilter! :)

    • @palefire
      @palefire  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thankyou David!

  • @wearashirt
    @wearashirt 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    I wonder what was going on with Extraction 4 and 5?

  • @geuros
    @geuros 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    yep, it matters a lot - quite not surprisingly. Basically, if the tamp is not level, water gets the quickest through the thinnest part of the puck and gets pressed straight down from that place. The flow from the portafilter then starts from that place, which is usually off-centric. If it starts there, then once water gets through the thickest parts, because of the affinity they'll join the primary flow, it will probably remain off-centric. I guess this might be one of the reasons to create convex tamper, but I will rather learn proper tamping technique than that, as in my mind I want my puck to be pressed with uniform pressure.
    Also, do you notice that even when it seems like proper extraction, you might get something like "tornado flow", which is thinner, sometimes messy - sometimes not even visible. Happens to me sometimes. I believe I liked the most the shots that looked almost like "milking the cow in slow motion".
    Great stuff, wonderful to finally see (to my disappointment), what's happening in the group head. Now it seems that espresso gets the oil character and crema on the border of pressure difference, quite boring in contrast to an idea that there is some magic happening in the group, but its physics :D Thank you! :)

    • @palefire
      @palefire  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks Radim! I sometimes see what you call the 'tornado flow' when I use the little La Pavoni lever machine, which is less easy to handle than (for instance) my Londinium lever machine. Or it happens when part of the grinds are older, for instance in the early morning, a first shot from a grinder that has more retention. I do still think it's a remarkable metamorphosis, from a dry brittle puck to a flexible 'body' that receives water on one end end oozes out delicious espresso on the other end. ;-)

    • @geuros
      @geuros 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@palefire definitely :-) I mostly work with Gaggia Classic (at work), it's pretty capable, but not really meant to make many drinks an hour. If you would be the third person in the queue, it would be noticeable, almost like the pump getting "exhausted". But when it's really ready, I'm pulling triple shots (20g) using naked portafilter and that's just porn... Thinking about buying ECM Synchronika to my home, especially now during the quarantine :-D

    • @palefire
      @palefire  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@geuros Good quarantine therapy, planning the next machine ;-)

  • @omerjamalelden2012
    @omerjamalelden2012 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome for learning.

  • @jayaline
    @jayaline 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    super information !

    • @palefire
      @palefire  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thankyou!

  • @firmbutton6485
    @firmbutton6485 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Frans, what would your thoughts on putting a fine mesh on the top of the bed of coffee to prevent damage of the surface from water droping on it?

    • @palefire
      @palefire  7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi Lmm, thanks for writing. Your idea may very well improve the extraction but I such a mesh would likely move the coffee puck observation farther away from what is actually happening in a regular brew head and the usual non-transparent portafilter situation.

    • @firmbutton6485
      @firmbutton6485 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Don't you think it would be closer to real life as in a normal situation, the shower screen would only be mm away from the puck rather than a cm or more as in the transparent PF?

    • @firmbutton6485
      @firmbutton6485 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I thin this shows how absolutely essential it is to have perfectly level tamp?

    • @palefire
      @palefire  7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      The relatively long distance in the transparent PF is not optimal. I have played with a sort of 'thick shower screen' with holes in it a little above the puck but that did not work well either. Someday someone else will come with a very functional realistic transparent device. At Fracino they had one with internal lighting even but they did not document it with film. And so far such devices are short lived so the projects end somewhere on a shelf or in a drawer.

    • @palefire
      @palefire  7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I agree that a level tamp is helpful.

  • @ronaldsantosjapan
    @ronaldsantosjapan 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow. You can see the process so well.
    The clear port a filter looks uneven at the base though. This makes the water pool at one end of the puck at the start of the shot. The he results look great nonetheless. Very educational.

    • @palefire
      @palefire  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thankyou very much!

    • @michaeldimmitt2188
      @michaeldimmitt2188 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Is there a paper filter at the bottom? What is that white line?

  • @curtisstewart9594
    @curtisstewart9594 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fascinating. Thank you for your efforts. Maybe casting with clear acrylics one could make these. But the sudden temperature/pressure shock would require 3-5 times thickness for safety.

    • @palefire
      @palefire  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you! Yes, with enough resources a robust device that sits higher in the brew group would be possible. I am sure that R&D departments of companies like Illy / Nespresso have done it but not shared the spectacular images so it's up to the little guys ;-)

    • @icowrich
      @icowrich 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@palefire It seems to me that this would be a great application for that new transparent aluminum. dornob.com/transparent-aluminum-glass-like-see-through-metal/

    • @palefire
      @palefire  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@icowrich yes!

  • @diycoffeeguy8806
    @diycoffeeguy8806 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video Frans! Have you ever tried to calculate the velocity of the water as it wicks through the puck? Would be very interesting to see how much (if any) difference there is between grind sizes. A pity we couldn't see what was going on at the bottom of the basket during these shots!

    • @palefire
      @palefire  7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks! Yes it would be fun to study this further but it takes a lot of handiwork to get one transparent filter and keep it in operation. Also in this method there's more water than usual on top of it, so a one on one comparison with "real life" is not guaranteed. We might get back to it sometime in the future or others will take it a step further.

  • @wiloghby
    @wiloghby 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    very interesting

  • @pakily36
    @pakily36 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Where I can get this filter?

    • @palefire
      @palefire  4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      They are not for sale - Tije made a couple for the purpose of the filming. I have seen some others in Instagram, like some looking really really slick, made in Asia, but as far as I know none actually came online for sale. One Seattle factory asked Tije to make one for their educational / training video material but it was too expensive, especially since one would still need tech staff at location to fix any leaks along the way because the different expand/shrink coefficent of the different materials (sealant, metal, plastic) creates leaks under the 9bar pressure and sudden high temperatures.

  • @ryonanno7
    @ryonanno7 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for the video. But are some of the pucks uneven?

    • @xbaxdark
      @xbaxdark 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yes some are clearly very un-even, and even distribution of the espresso and tamping are absolutely key to a good extraction so I would discard any of the tests with bad tamping like that altogether as failed tests. The way to narrow down variables is by having a very consistent tamping method, I'm told how hard isn't as important as it being as even as possible.

    • @blzt3206
      @blzt3206 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@xbaxdark You're correct.

  • @MichalisMessanakis
    @MichalisMessanakis 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I want to buy one of this..... Perfect gift for my best friend who is in this job...

    • @palefire
      @palefire  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I do not know any of these for sale now, sorry!

    • @MichalisMessanakis
      @MichalisMessanakis 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@palefire yea I know, I have searched all the internet for it 😂😂😂

  • @K.Bush94
    @K.Bush94 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How was the coffee made with 4 bars? Is there a big difference? I’m asking because there are many 3,5-4 bar espresso machines out there.

    • @palefire
      @palefire  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Kristof B. On the current model Londinium-R it is easy to compare exact pre infusion pressure. Lighter beans need higher pressure for full bodied extraction, traditional Italian roast does fine at low pressure pre infusion.

    • @jamesnettleton68
      @jamesnettleton68 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      3.5 bar machines are steam driven. The coffee is extracted too slowly. This results in burned tasting coffee that is under extracted. I used to have steam machine 3.5 bar. Not bad with plunger style coffee. You can pre infuse for 30 seconds after using the steaming function. Takes about 28 seconds to make a semi expresso. You won, t form crema at 3.5 bar. You need atleast 9 bar for that and the right temperature con trol.

  • @paperweight_
    @paperweight_ 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    These are really interesting. Do you still do this? Have you tried purposefully introducing defects into the puck, such as clumps, cracks, uneven distribution? Was interesting to see the one that cracked after pressure was released. I try to examine my pucks to see if I made any such errors, but it seems like a crack after extraction might not mean there was a crack during, and not evidence of channelling?

    • @palefire
      @palefire  4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Thank you! When the last one of the transparent portafilters blew up we also had about everything we wanted so we went on to other things. So we did not experiment with other variables. What we learned is that a tamp should not be too firm because we want to immerse the dry puck and have it transform itself into this flexible body that aborbs more water on one side and oozes out delicious espresso on the other end. Good distribution of the grinds is important, clumps in grinds are not as bas as they seem. And a dry puck can look broken on the top because at the end, when the pressure above the puck is much less, the compressed air pockets can expand and 'pop' but by then the espresso in the cup has already found its way to the taste buds and no harm is done.

    • @gregsullivan7408
      @gregsullivan7408 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@palefire regarding tamping pressure, FWIW, this study found no difference in the extraction when varying the pressure between 5kg to 20kg: socraticcoffee.com/2015/07/the-impact-of-tamping-pressure-on-espresso-extraction/

    • @palefire
      @palefire  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@gregsullivan7408 Yes, (after distribution of grinds) a gentle level tamp is necessary and other tamping varieties are probably just trivial hocus pocus.

  • @godwithin
    @godwithin 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    First time I've seen this done clearly..please correct me if I'm wrong,it seems to me that espresso is just basically drip coffee with the difference of the coffee particles being finer and being compacted before the hot water dips down?

    • @palefire
      @palefire  4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Thanks! It's a great question and some may hold different views than I have. In my observation, something remarkable happens in the basket under pressure. The hot water immerses the puck, air bubbles escape and also gas is expelled from the grinds and instead of a dry brittle compacted amount of unconnected grinds the puck transforms into a fexible unity which is able to slightly expand and shrink while basically remaining the same unified body that is infused with the hot water on one end while it oozes out espresso on the other end. At the bottom end, some gas / air that was compressed into the water, is coming out again as crema, enabled by the fatty substance from the grinds. Old beans and pre-ground coffee grinds that have completely de-gassed do not yield this crema in that quanity. Drip coffee on the other hand seems to change less spectacularly, as it rests in the filter, gets wet, 'blooms' and merely gets muddy. Light roasts can yield exquisite coffee this way, but I have not delved deeply into that brew method and cannot speak about it too much.

    • @BensCoffeeRants
      @BensCoffeeRants 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      There's similarities, hot water is extracting the coffee solubles.
      The grind size, pressure, the speed (and scale: less coffee being extracted at once) of the extraction are very different. Also with drip the paper filter reduces oils and fine particles from the coffee.

  • @wasbloem
    @wasbloem 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Is dat een Rocket R58? Bijzondere drukopbouw in dat geval!

    • @palefire
      @palefire  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Gilleko slow motion. Het is een rocket giotto. Daar is op gevement wel een dubbele OPV in geplaatst zodat pre-infusie en extractie elk op een andere druk kunnen, maar ik weet niet meer of dat ten tijde van deze opname er reeds in zat.

  • @nucupanzaru9609
    @nucupanzaru9609 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    interesting, but how can I be sure that the pressure is the one show in the video? and the coffee used, the granulation... are much unknown!

    • @palefire
      @palefire  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      There are many variables, which makes it all so much more interesting to think about. The pressure is a relative thing wherever you measure. For instance, at 9 bar in the tubing towards the brew group, the pressure just below the holes of the filterbasket is just the room / atmospheric pressure and the higher you'd measure in the puck, the higher the pressure reading will be. If one embeds a temperature probe inside the puck which I've done extensively, that reading also depends a lot on the exact placement of the probe, the type of probe (thin/thick, fast/slow), and the flow of the extraction. So not a single one of these observations is absolute. With lots of different angles and data, and even more thinking about it, one can get a better understanding of what's happening, adjust accordingly, and if it works, enjoy most delicious espresso ;-)

    • @nucupanzaru9609
      @nucupanzaru9609 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@palefire thanks for the reply!👍

    • @palefire
      @palefire  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@nucupanzaru9609 Thank you!

  • @ange5354
    @ange5354 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    hello! we are desperately searching for a transparent portafilter, any idea where we cna buy it! thanks in adv

    • @palefire
      @palefire  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      angie erdenetsogt hi! I have no idea who would have one or who is presently working on making these. Sorry!

  • @catalinjeanmarc
    @catalinjeanmarc 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Really nice job 👍 some questions about this experiment : what is your conclusion about puck prep, in other words what do you recommend for a best puck preparation in order to obtain the best coffee taste. On the text on the video you mention xx gr , is it the qty of coffee in ? There is no indication about the force in kg applied with the tamper when you write low or firm tamp. This indication is important in your conclusion. Waiting to reading you. BR.

    • @palefire
      @palefire  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thankyou Jean-Marc! Yes the g is the amount of dry coffee grinds. Tamping flat with mild force and a tamper that fits snugly is helpful. Tamping hard is counter productive as the puck then is harder to pre-infuse. Greetings, F

    • @catalinjeanmarc
      @catalinjeanmarc 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@palefire thanks for the answer. Have you a idea of the snugly force to use on the tamper. I use a bravo tamper. But I have no idea on how to adjust the force and which value of force is correct. Any help on that is welcome 🤗

    • @palefire
      @palefire  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@catalinjeanmarc the tamper should fit, not so tight that you pull out the puck like a cork when pulling away the tamper. Enough force to have a flat top of tge puck. A friendly but strict feel of pushing. No agressive feel. I never measured the kg force. This part is not to worry about too much. You notice if the pre infusion takes a looong time at 9 bar that you may have ground too fine or tamped too hard :-)

  • @khaledzurikat7190
    @khaledzurikat7190 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Do they make these with spouts (58mm)?
    Very cool video

    • @palefire
      @palefire  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Khaled Zurikat thanks Khaled! The transparent portafilters were temporary products. A lot of work but very satisfying to observe what happens, even if the device would need repairs after a few shots and finally break complelely after a dozen shots. To my knowlegde no spouted ones have been made.

  • @sungha360
    @sungha360 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    oddly satisfying

    • @palefire
      @palefire  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes ;-) there is no name for it yet.

    • @yrulooknatme
      @yrulooknatme 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@palefire lol... I call it coffee porn or corn...

  • @whiterogue1
    @whiterogue1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    sorry, where can i buy one of those?

    • @palefire
      @palefire  4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      They are not for sale - Tije made a couple for the purpose of the filming. I have seen some others in Instagram, like some looking really really slick, made in Asia, but as far as I know none actually came online for sale. One Seattle factory asked Tije to make one for their educational / training video material but it was too expensive, especially since one would still need tech staff at location to fix any leaks along the way because the different expand/shrink coefficent of the different materials (sealant, metal, plastic) creates leaks under the 9bar pressure and sudden high temperatures.

    • @whiterogue1
      @whiterogue1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@palefire thank you.
      that info is very helpful. If I find any transparent portafilters for sale, I'll share that info in the comments.
      Looking for a couple of those now.

    • @palefire
      @palefire  4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@whiterogue1 best of luck! If you find a source I'm sure a number of people will be keen to get their hands on one as well.

    • @miniwarrior7
      @miniwarrior7 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Welding properly cut plexiglass to properly cut plexiglass shouldn't leak under 9bar but unfortunately no engineers have tried to solve this problem...

    • @palefire
      @palefire  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@miniwarrior7 It's also the plexiglass part attached, sealed to the brass of the portfilter and the steel of the filter basket bottom. Each part material with its own measure of widening/shrinking when temperature peaks/drops. The sealant can keep up with this up to a point for a number of shots but not over a lot of shots. Others have also built such devices and some in Asia looked much nicer even but I have not seen them for sale as robust tools (yet).

  • @AR-ml9eo
    @AR-ml9eo 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    The clear material is ...? Plastic or glass?

    • @palefire
      @palefire  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      A R not glass. I should ask Tije who made it but if i remember correctly it was borosilicate.

    • @palefire
      @palefire  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      PS correction! Tije explains it was acryl but polycarbonate would have been a possible alternative. So no borosilicate.

  • @user-ln9cb4di2h
    @user-ln9cb4di2h 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good afternoon, can you order such a holder from you?

    • @palefire
      @palefire  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Анатолий Сапаргельдыев Hi! Tije made just a few that we used for filming. It’s a lot of work and a device like that does not ‘live’ very long. He has not made any more, so none for sale. Best regards, Frans

    • @user-ln9cb4di2h
      @user-ln9cb4di2h 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Frans Goddijn Very sorry ) . Thanks for the answer !

  • @mahmoudramadanabdelfadil6620
    @mahmoudramadanabdelfadil6620 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    If it was made of plastic so it would change the taste, if made of glass it would not stand for pushing water for long time i think, but nice try to let see the extraction proceed. thanks🌷

    • @palefire
      @palefire  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you Mahmoud!

  • @pav2k
    @pav2k 9 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    I was pretty sure the coffee puck should touch the showerscreen.. In your case it doesn't seem to happen.. Also you probably get a very wet puck in the end..

    • @palefire
      @palefire  9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      In this lower extra 'portafilter' the shower screen is not playing along much. Yes, there's more water landing on the puck, so the after-shot happenings also do not reflect a real life situation in a closed off 'normal' portafilter.

    • @miniwarrior7
      @miniwarrior7 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@palefire so this example doesn't match real world situations. Kinda sad.

    • @palefire
      @palefire  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      topher ‘real world’ needs to be in quotation marks, to prevent sadness :-)

  • @eldabasa
    @eldabasa 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Does it include preinfusion

    • @palefire
      @palefire  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Everything starts with preinfusion, one could say

  • @Jokerburt
    @Jokerburt ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Where to buy it?

    • @palefire
      @palefire  ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi. It's not a product that's for sale. The best option is to have someone nearby with a lathe and engineering skills to make one and have him/her fix the device in between sessons to keep it in working condition as long as possible. At the time that we first published these videos about the transparent portafilter some others also seemed to be producing similar devices and on Instagram an Asian guy even posted very impressive beautiful photos of one that had external metal 'braces' to keep the thing together but i never saw one like that for sale.

  • @8rafasimas
    @8rafasimas 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This videos makes me think that precision shower screens doesn't make any difference

    • @palefire
      @palefire  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I agree. A well cleaned shower screen is more effective than an expensive one.

  • @weonculiao
    @weonculiao 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Que hermoso

    • @palefire
      @palefire  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Gracias!

  • @Gernatch
    @Gernatch 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What the puck?

    • @palefire
      @palefire  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Love it!

  • @brilwiljeff
    @brilwiljeff 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'd like some of that coffee flavored goodness please

    • @palefire
      @palefire  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      jeff medvin delicious stuff :-)

  • @muhamadsyamsudin6882
    @muhamadsyamsudin6882 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    success, brother 🙂😊

    • @palefire
      @palefire  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you!

  • @halilmercan2023
    @halilmercan2023 ปีที่แล้ว

    😍😍😍😍 waowwww❤

  • @mohamedfaroukbalouli7809
    @mohamedfaroukbalouli7809 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Does this prove that tamping is useless?!!

    • @palefire
      @palefire  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      No I dont think so. A light and flat tamp is helpful, but there is some swirling of grinds that does not cause problems, and once fully permeated with water, the puck is a rather flexible 'body' which can expand/compress and sit snug in the basket.

  • @l...
    @l... 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Please 60FPS

    • @palefire
      @palefire  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Will keep it in mind if we ever produce one again.

    • @l...
      @l... 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@palefire thank you

  • @baristamariotv
    @baristamariotv 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    how can i make one of those portafilters?

    • @palefire
      @palefire  8 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      +marioidrovorodri It's not easy. Get transparant material that can stand heat & pressure, find someone to use an existing portafilter to fix that to, think of a way to attach the bottom of a filter basket which you carefully sawed off. The sealant must resist enormous pressure, 9 bar or it will go POOF! and also the different temperature / volume values of the materials may not be too far different or a cool system, once heated, will fall apart. So you will need an experienced craftsman with a fine workshop. And even the best one will fall apart after a number of extractions so be careful not to hurt yourself. On the other hand, watching these clips is practically without any danger if you have a good chair.

    • @ondrejmacicek4886
      @ondrejmacicek4886 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      material has to be non toxic

    • @ondrejmacicek4886
      @ondrejmacicek4886 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      without BPA

    • @BobFrostV
      @BobFrostV 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Make one out of Sapphire Crystal like wrist watches have :)) Bet it costs a fortune or two though. Maybe Lux Crystal like Seiko's watches use would be a much better price and is non-toxic.

  • @oscarmadrid4216
    @oscarmadrid4216 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can I have one to promote it in New Zealand? And you can start a business you never know.... all the best my friend. Greetings from NZ. Oscar.

    • @palefire
      @palefire  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks Oscar! Tije is currently working on other projects, one of them being a new and beautiful version of the small smart coffee roaster that Jan is building the controls for. So I don't expect a new iteration of the transparent portafilter. Greetings and happy December days!

  • @BensCoffeeRants
    @BensCoffeeRants 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    1:46 Oh shit! Don't you hate it when you forget the cup!?

  • @albertomartin70
    @albertomartin70 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That weird gap 🤔

    • @palefire
      @palefire  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes, a tool bounced against it and we kept it like that. Should have turned it away from the camera though ;-)

    • @albertomartin70
      @albertomartin70 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Frans Goddijn no, no... I mean the air gap between the coffee and the “dispenser” (I don’t know how to call it... language problems). I have an espresso machine and it keep it tight the entire process (no gap), even after I finish extracting. It never “swell” as I read someone saying it does after. I saw a bit of “turbulence” on the gap as it inject water, is that good when trying to do the best possible coffee (maybe a competition)? That gap was intentionally to prove there is no need to compress the coffee while it is extracting?... It was nice to see how the coffee soaked the water uniformly 👍🏻

    • @palefire
      @palefire  4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@albertomartin70 Ah yes the space between puck and shower screen. Often in 'real' life that space is smaller but here it allows one to better observe what happens. Even if the space is small, the spuck tends to swell but is also compacted by the extraction pressure. If one has a hand lever machine and pulls too hard on the lever, the puck is compacted so much that the flow is actually slower than with a less fierce pull. I found it interesting that the turbulence is not a problem and during pre-infusion the puck changes from a brittle pack into a flexible unit of substance that can endure a lot.

  • @ondrejmacicek4886
    @ondrejmacicek4886 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    material must be non toxic without BPA (this can be harmful E.g. for pregnant women)

  • @Straightfromshibuya
    @Straightfromshibuya 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Very uneven extractio. Must have been really sour

    • @palefire
      @palefire  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thanks Steven for your observation! The image at 1:53 does not look bad at all to me but this device and the videos were aiming at best view rather than best taste ;-) Although the taste may have been subtly enhanced by the superglue / sealant keeping the device more or less i one piece as long as possible. I don't think we drank any of it.

  • @impaque
    @impaque 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    So much channeling...

    • @palefire
      @palefire  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      impaque :-)

  • @anggasatya69
    @anggasatya69 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Oh my god, did you just discard that espresso down to the drainage? What a waste man

    • @palefire
      @palefire  4 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      I agree, it's something to think about. Those berries were hand picked, washed, dried, sorted, selected, packed, shipped, cleared, picked up, roasted, ground, all by experts using the best tools available. Using supermarket low quality beans was an option, but would yield a much different result than what we were trying to make visible. Drinking the extraction was an option, but the materials we used for sealant and transparency were not all 'food safe' so could cause different worries. In our experience, a device like this falls apart beyond repair after a maximum of a dozen shots and that's why we did out best to gain as much visual information as possible during that 'run'. If others learn from the videos and in result waste fewer beans, getting a best extraction with less experimentation, it might turn out to be a good strategy.

    • @sonny9390
      @sonny9390 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Angga Aditama “waste man” 😂😂

    • @lutze5086
      @lutze5086 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Give him your address a he can send in the mail