PERFECT EDUCATION FOR INTELLIGENT UNMARRIED MEN. YES, I AM IN SEARCH OF THESE ANSWERS STILL NOW. THIS KNOWLEDGE WILL HAVE ONLY WITH THEIR WIFE FOR SOME YEARS. SO MARRIED MEN ONLY CAN ANSWER. NOT BAD. BUT THIS VIDEO IS GOOD
ఒక గొప్ప వాదాన్నీ, అందులో పాల్గొన్న వారినీ ఇలా హాస్యాస్పదంగా చూపిన ఆ దర్శక, నిర్మాతలకు అసలు కళాభిరుచి కానీ, ఆధ్యాత్మిక విషయాల పై అవగాహన కానీ, హైందవ ధర్మం పట్ల గౌరవం కానీ, లేదనే చెప్పాలి. నటులు చేత కూడా అతి గా నటింపజేశారు.
in this dialogue, i see the following things: 1. that women were as highly educated as men. 2. that even great scholars are prone to ego. 3. that scholarly debates are conducted under strict rules ensuring that the debaters do not lose their cool during the debate and it does not become a shouting match. 4. that the person sitting in the position of judge need not get up even if that person's husband is sitting. (as per the norms of the day, a wife was not expected to remain sitting when her husband had stood up) 5. that once a woman was given the position of the judge, she had to remain impartial no matter what. 6. that the debate was on dwaita-adwaita siddhantam; a very deep concept that could not be understood easily. 7. that all proofs had to be given using logic, reaasoning and solid proofs given in the vedic texts. 8. now, it will appear to be foolish, misleading and demeaning for the prestige of both Mandana Mishra and Adi Shankara. However, all i see is that it is a clash of titans - equally talented and highly learned men. I saw the Sanskrit version of the movie and i couldn't connect much to the scenes at all. the scene where the Chandala opens Asi Shankara's eyes was as bland as the debate scene between Mandana Mishra and Adi Shankara. for a layman, the Telugu vesrion is quite enlightening while the Sanskrit version doesn't tell him much. All i saw in the Sanskrit version was that a debate took place for 17 days. the actual debate was not shown - not even a few questions and answers that could shed some light on the nature of the debate. Despite the overaction, this movie connects to the layman better than the Sanskrit version. I don't know about the technicalities of the movie or whether it is factually correct or whether it is misleading, but i was able to connect and understand why Adi Shankaracharya became so great.
So much difference between languages adi language was Sanskrit, no more telgu,Tamil, kannada, lastly Malayalam. You can't imagine the best of adi shankara. May god Vishnu bless you ai 👍
Debate between adi shankara n mandana mishra s considered as one of the best debate. Most philosophical points like maha vakyas, vedas and vedantas have been discussed. Especially advaitha philosophy was proved by vedantic texts. In this scene the advaitha philosophy is completely mislead. No point in having the funny conversations and egoistic expressions. And the examples given to prove the advaitha and karma kanda was baseless.
E movie okkate kaadu serials kuda alane tayaru ayyayi. Ishtamochinattu teesiparesthunaru movies and serials. Legal ga edana action teesukuntey thappa ilanti dushpracharalani aapalemu 😞
వారిష్టమొచ్చినట్లు చలనచిత్రాన్ని నిర్మించారు. అదో దిక్కుమాలిన సంత. 1980 కాలంలో అద్భుతమైన చలనచిత్రం తీసారు. దానితో పోల్చుకొంటే ఇది చాల అసహ్యకరముగా ఉన్నది.
in this dialogue, i see the following things: 1. that women were as highly educated as men. 2. that even great scholars are prone to ego. 3. that scholarly debates are conducted under strict rules ensuring that the debaters do not lose their cool during the debate and it does not become a shouting match. 4. that the person sitting in the position of judge need not get up even if that person's husband is sitting. (as per the norms of the day, a wife was not expected to remain sitting when her husband had stood up) 5. that once a woman was given the position of the judge, she had to remain impartial no matter what. 6. that the debate was on dwaita-adwaita siddhantam; a very deep concept that could not be understood easily. 7. that all proofs had to be given using logic, reaasoning and solid proofs given in the vedic texts. 8. now, it will appear to be foolish, misleading and demeaning for the prestige of both Mandana Mishra and Adi Shankara. However, all i see is that it is a clash of titans - equally talented and highly learned men. I saw the Sanskrit version of the movie and i couldn't connect much to the scenes at all. the scene where the Chandala opens Asi Shankara's eyes was as bland as the debate scene between Mandana Mishra and Adi Shankara. for a layman, the Telugu vesrion is quite enlightening while the Sanskrit version doesn't tell him much. All i saw in the Sanskrit version was that a debate took place for 17 days. the actual debate was not shown - not even a few questions and answers that could shed some light on the nature of the debate. Despite the overaction, this movie connects to the layman better than the Sanskrit version. I don't know about the technicalities of the movie or whether it is factually correct or whether it is misleading, but i was able to connect and understand why Adi Shankaracharya became so great.
Why Telugu movies do have so aggressiveness in dialogue delivery and background music...? Shankara's dialogue delivery has to be soft because yogis never speak aggressively... I don't understand Telugu. But each dialogue gives me palpitation...!!
South India makes Movies like Action. Mandan Mishr was a Brahman just like AdiShankarAcharya. A Pleasant Shastrarth took place for Days. Thus, A Great Movie in Sanskrit from Kerala in Sanskrit AdiShankarAcharya to be Great.
Do not criticise South Indian movies just because of this movie. The Sanskrit movie on Shankaracharya was made by G.V Iyer who is a South Indian. Stop teasing South Indians. Anyways, did you even understand a single word in this😂
in this dialogue, i see the following things: 1. that women were as highly educated as men. 2. that even great scholars are prone to ego. 3. that scholarly debates are conducted under strict rules ensuring that the debaters do not lose their cool during the debate and it does not become a shouting match. 4. that the person sitting in the position of judge need not get up even if that person's husband is sitting. (as per the norms of the day, a wife was not expected to remain sitting when her husband had stood up) 5. that once a woman was given the position of the judge, she had to remain impartial no matter what. 6. that the debate was on dwaita-adwaita siddhantam; a very deep concept that could not be understood easily. 7. that all proofs had to be given using logic, reaasoning and solid proofs given in the vedic texts. 8. now, it will appear to be foolish, misleading and demeaning for the prestige of both Mandana Mishra and Adi Shankara. However, all i see is that it is a clash of titans - equally talented and highly learned men. I saw the Sanskrit version of the movie and i couldn't connect much to the scenes at all. the scene where the Chandala opens Asi Shankara's eyes was as bland as the debate scene between Mandana Mishra and Adi Shankara. for a layman, the Telugu vesrion is quite enlightening while the Sanskrit version doesn't tell him much. All i saw in the Sanskrit version was that a debate took place for 17 days. the actual debate was not shown - not even a few questions and answers that could shed some light on the nature of the debate. Despite the overaction, this movie connects to the layman better than the Sanskrit version. I don't know about the technicalities of the movie or whether it is factually correct or whether it is misleading, but i was able to connect and understand why Adi Shankaracharya became so great.
They attempted to deliver the concept with good motive but they could not deliver in correct content, We have to encourage with proper inputs to make it better
Education and Knowledge brings serenity and compassion to one personality. Adi Sankracharya is a great name... The director and the actor totally unfairly portrayed Sri Sankracharya. Arrogance on both the characters. Even Mandan Mishra was not like that. Director totally missed the point.
@@saradabaisaradabai9216 I respect your word. But I wish you should know snow about sankaracharya and the way he has chosen and what he actually fight for. I don't say it is the best one. But atleast he tried to his level to showup the things happened in his life
जय भोलेनाथ हर हर महादेव जय सोमनाथ जय भोलेनाथ हर हर महादेव जय सोमनाथ जय भोलेनाथ हर हर महादेव जय सोमनाथ जय भोलेनाथ हर हर महादेव जय सोमनाथ जय भोलेनाथ हर हर महादेव जय सोमनाथ जय भोलेनाथ हर हर महादेव जय सोमनाथ जय भोलेनाथ हर हर महादेव जय सोमनाथ
in this dialogue, i see the following things: 1. that women were as highly educated as men. 2. that even great scholars are prone to ego. 3. that scholarly debates are conducted under strict rules ensuring that the debaters do not lose their cool during the debate and it does not become a shouting match. 4. that the person sitting in the position of judge need not get up even if that person's husband is sitting. (as per the norms of the day, a wife was not expected to remain sitting when her husband had stood up) 5. that once a woman was given the position of the judge, she had to remain impartial no matter what. 6. that the debate was on dwaita-adwaita siddhantam; a very deep concept that could not be understood easily. 7. that all proofs had to be given using logic, reaasoning and solid proofs given in the vedic texts. 8. now, it will appear to be foolish, misleading and demeaning for the prestige of both Mandana Mishra and Adi Shankara. However, all i see is that it is a clash of titans - equally talented and highly learned men. I saw the Sanskrit version of the movie and i couldn't connect much to the scenes at all. the scene where the Chandala opens Asi Shankara's eyes was as bland as the debate scene between Mandana Mishra and Adi Shankara. for a layman, the Telugu vesrion is quite enlightening while the Sanskrit version doesn't tell him much. All i saw in the Sanskrit version was that a debate took place for 17 days. the actual debate was not shown - not even a few questions and answers that could shed some light on the nature of the debate. Despite the overaction, this movie connects to the layman better than the Sanskrit version. I don't know about the technicalities of the movie or whether it is factually correct or whether it is misleading, but i was able to connect and understand why Adi Shankaracharya became so great.
moral of this video is it is highly impossible for telugu industry to direct a movie naturally. shankaracharya never shows anger or exaggeration on his face as he is a yogi. this video great insult to shankaracharya and mandara misra too. watch old shankaracharya movie and see the difference. th-cam.com/video/aiwaoWcGtx8/w-d-xo.html
*మనిషి తాను లోకం నుండి పొందిన అజ్ఞానం వదిలించు కోవడానికి, అనవసర ఆలోచనలు, అనవసర నమ్మకాల, విశ్వాసాల మరియు అనవసర సాధనాల నుండి ముక్తి పోవడానికి, సత్యజ్ఞానమైన సృష్టి జ్ఞానం పొందటమే ఆధారము. సృష్టిలో అన్ని మత గ్రంధాల, జగత్ గురువుల, ప్రవక్తల బోధనల సారం సైతం అదే. అయితే సత్య జ్ఞానాన్ని మరియు సత్య విషయం అయిన "నేను" " అహం" "I am" ని గ్రహించటం మాని, దానికి బదులు ఆ సత్యం బోధించిన వారిని పట్టుకుని వెలాడటమే లోకం లోని యుగయుగాల ఆధ్యాత్మిక అంధకారానికి మూలం. ఒక గ్రంథంలో ఒక సత్యం, మరొక గ్రంథంలో మరొక సత్యం , అలానే ఒక ప్రవక్త ఒక సత్యం, మరొక ప్రవక్త మరొక సత్యం చెప్పే అవకాశం సైతం సత్యంలో ఎప్పుడూ ఉండే అవకాశం సైతం ఉండదు. అంతర్ముఖం కాగలిగి ఎవరికి వారు తమ లోనే సత్యం పొందగలిగే మార్గమే నిజ సత్య మార్గం. నేనే సత్యం అహం బ్రహ్మాస్మి శివోహం. సత్య చోధనకు, సత్య సాధనకు ఈ సత్య అవగాహనే తాళం చెవి మరియు లోకంలోని సర్వ జీవుల మీద ప్రేమ, ఆప్యాయత, ఆత్మీయత కల్పించే ఏకైక ఆత్మ విశ్వాత్మ అయిన పరమాత్మ జ్ఞానం .*
Adi shankaracharya was never like this . He was a sadhu by nature . People prostrate before him not opposing him . They did argue with him but in an ethical way .! But all these aren't found here 🙃😒😒😒😒 really sorry but this is an utter disgrace to adi shakaracharya
खुप महत्वाचा प्रसंग आहे.जर मराठी भाषेत भाषांतरीत करता आला तर पहावा. नम्र विनंती
నేటి యువతరం ఈ మువీ ఒకసారి చూడాలని కోరుకుంటున్న
లేదంటే మిమల్ని మీరు కోలిపోవచ్చు
స్వామియే చరణం అయ్యప్ప🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏 చాలా అద్భుతమైన సీను చూపిస్తున్నారు ప్రతి ఒక్కరూ స్వామి వారిని దర్శించుకోవాలి
Accept ✝️ you evil hindu
PERFECT EDUCATION FOR INTELLIGENT UNMARRIED MEN. YES, I AM IN SEARCH OF THESE ANSWERS STILL NOW. THIS KNOWLEDGE WILL HAVE ONLY WITH THEIR WIFE FOR SOME YEARS. SO MARRIED MEN ONLY CAN ANSWER. NOT BAD. BUT THIS VIDEO IS GOOD
ಅದ್ಭುತ ಅತ್ಯದ್ಭುತ 🙏🙏🙏
Atleast through the movie like this... many people have come to know about the debate which was held ...about Advaita. ,🙏
After so much search, i got it.adi Shankara who made India and maa bharti ❤️🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Thanks
Excellent 🙏
ఒక గొప్ప వాదాన్నీ, అందులో పాల్గొన్న వారినీ ఇలా హాస్యాస్పదంగా చూపిన ఆ దర్శక, నిర్మాతలకు అసలు కళాభిరుచి కానీ, ఆధ్యాత్మిక విషయాల పై అవగాహన కానీ, హైందవ ధర్మం పట్ల గౌరవం కానీ, లేదనే చెప్పాలి. నటులు చేత కూడా అతి గా నటింపజేశారు.
Neeku undha
in this dialogue, i see the following things:
1. that women were as highly educated as men.
2. that even great scholars are prone to ego.
3. that scholarly debates are conducted under strict rules ensuring that the debaters do not lose their cool during the debate and it does not become a shouting match.
4. that the person sitting in the position of judge need not get up even if that person's husband is sitting. (as per the norms of the day, a wife was not expected to remain sitting when her husband had stood up)
5. that once a woman was given the position of the judge, she had to remain impartial no matter what.
6. that the debate was on dwaita-adwaita siddhantam; a very deep concept that could not be understood easily.
7. that all proofs had to be given using logic, reaasoning and solid proofs given in the vedic texts.
8. now, it will appear to be foolish, misleading and demeaning for the prestige of both Mandana Mishra and Adi Shankara. However, all i see is that it is a clash of titans - equally talented and highly learned men. I saw the Sanskrit version of the movie and i couldn't connect much to the scenes at all. the scene where the Chandala opens Asi Shankara's eyes was as bland as the debate scene between Mandana Mishra and Adi Shankara. for a layman, the Telugu vesrion is quite enlightening while the Sanskrit version doesn't tell him much. All i saw in the Sanskrit version was that a debate took place for 17 days. the actual debate was not shown - not even a few questions and answers that could shed some light on the nature of the debate.
Despite the overaction, this movie connects to the layman better than the Sanskrit version. I don't know about the technicalities of the movie or whether it is factually correct or whether it is misleading, but i was able to connect and understand why Adi Shankaracharya became so great.
మీ
వాళ్ళకి క్షలక్షన్స్ ముఖ్యం.మలయాళ చిత్రం చక్కగా తీశారు.తెలుగులో భ్రష్టు పట్టించారు.
Next movie mere director
జై జగత్ గురువు ఆది శెంకరాచార్యయ నమోస్తు
Another Shankaracharya needed to this world
Forget the world in order to restore our dharma the bharat varsha need him desperately🕉🙏 Jai Adi Guru Shankaracharya.
@Sahil ghanta he wasn't manuwadi
Kaushik Babu Our Swami Ayyappan 😍🙏(lots of love from Kerala)
Om namo Narayanaya namah om namah shivaya 🙏🌺🌹🌹🌷🌷🙏
2021 lo chustunna vallu oka like vesukondi.
So much difference between languages adi language was Sanskrit, no more telgu,Tamil, kannada, lastly Malayalam. You can't imagine the best of adi shankara. May god Vishnu bless you ai 👍
ಅಬ್ಬಾ ಎಂತ ಅದ್ಭುತ ಚಿತ್ರ.
Kaushik babu has a divine look...
ಶ್ರೀ ಜಗದ್ಗುರು ಆದಿಸಂಕರಾಚರ್ಯ ನಮಃ 🙏🙏🙏
Ramayanaparayamem
కమలిని ముఖర్జీ acting super
We need you again....Dhlarma is dying
@Satyam Singh Great Bro Keep it Up Jai Hind
Thandri kodukulu super ga natinchaaru sirs
భక్తి చిత్రాలలో నాకు నచ్చిన చిత్రం🙏🙏
Debate between adi shankara n mandana mishra s considered as one of the best debate. Most philosophical points like maha vakyas, vedas and vedantas have been discussed. Especially advaitha philosophy was proved by vedantic texts. In this scene the advaitha philosophy is completely mislead. No point in having the funny conversations and egoistic expressions. And the examples given to prove the advaitha and karma kanda was baseless.
Yes . There is no Subject in Discussion
Perhaps
th-cam.com/video/1rZAlFWlJ2A/w-d-xo.html
Q4
Tb
Thank you so much 🚗🏡
kamilini mukharji's acting was really super...once watch from 2:43 guys too funny!!!
😄😄 yes
Jai sankrachraya .A true master of hinduism and our g8est guide to turth.🙏🐄🙇🙇🙇🙇🙇🙇🙇🙇🙇🙇👌
th-cam.com/video/1rZAlFWlJ2A/w-d-xo.html
Superb acting saikumar
Humbly request to
VOLGA V
pl.dubbed in Hindi so as to able to every
Indian understand.
Best episode.
Nice. 🙏
E movie okkate kaadu serials kuda alane tayaru ayyayi. Ishtamochinattu teesiparesthunaru movies and serials. Legal ga edana action teesukuntey thappa ilanti dushpracharalani aapalemu 😞
Please Hindi version
I love this movie 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
వారిష్టమొచ్చినట్లు చలనచిత్రాన్ని నిర్మించారు. అదో దిక్కుమాలిన సంత.
1980 కాలంలో అద్భుతమైన చలనచిత్రం తీసారు. దానితో పోల్చుకొంటే ఇది చాల అసహ్యకరముగా ఉన్నది.
in this dialogue, i see the following things:
1. that women were as highly educated as men.
2. that even great scholars are prone to ego.
3. that scholarly debates are conducted under strict rules ensuring that the debaters do not lose their cool during the debate and it does not become a shouting match.
4. that the person sitting in the position of judge need not get up even if that person's husband is sitting. (as per the norms of the day, a wife was not expected to remain sitting when her husband had stood up)
5. that once a woman was given the position of the judge, she had to remain impartial no matter what.
6. that the debate was on dwaita-adwaita siddhantam; a very deep concept that could not be understood easily.
7. that all proofs had to be given using logic, reaasoning and solid proofs given in the vedic texts.
8. now, it will appear to be foolish, misleading and demeaning for the prestige of both Mandana Mishra and Adi Shankara. However, all i see is that it is a clash of titans - equally talented and highly learned men. I saw the Sanskrit version of the movie and i couldn't connect much to the scenes at all. the scene where the Chandala opens Asi Shankara's eyes was as bland as the debate scene between Mandana Mishra and Adi Shankara. for a layman, the Telugu vesrion is quite enlightening while the Sanskrit version doesn't tell him much. All i saw in the Sanskrit version was that a debate took place for 17 days. the actual debate was not shown - not even a few questions and answers that could shed some light on the nature of the debate.
Despite the overaction, this movie connects to the layman better than the Sanskrit version. I don't know about the technicalities of the movie or whether it is factually correct or whether it is misleading, but i was able to connect and understand why Adi Shankaracharya became so great.
Om shankaracharya 💝💝💝😘😘👏👏
I thank the creators 🙏they projected the both aacharyals and sharadhe 🙏
Super 👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌
Aham brahmasmi Jai Sri Krishna 🙏🙏🌹🌷
JAGHATH GURU SRI AADISHANKARA CHARYULU 🙏🌹🌺🙏
Bagundhi
Adi Shankaracharya vs IPS Agni! Epic!
సీతా movie
My favourite movie👌super movie
I want English or Hindi subtitles 🤗
Please make available it in hindi
Hare Krishna
సూపర్
Hello
Great
Om nama shivaya🙏
Fo such important Adi Shankara film, Please give us English subtitles! Thanks.
Sai kumar's acting was fabulous👌👌👏👏👏
⁰
As always
Chalaa bagundhi... Movie lo
Chinnapati Srikanth....
Super movie block buster
Great movie telugu ❤❤🎉
Awosem,ಶಂಕರಾಚಾರ್ಯ ನಮೋ ನಮಹ.
Om nama shivaya om namo sadguruaadhishankaracharyaswamiyeanamaha
Why Telugu movies do have so aggressiveness in dialogue delivery and background music...? Shankara's dialogue delivery has to be soft because yogis never speak aggressively... I don't understand Telugu. But each dialogue gives me palpitation...!!
Where r u from?
Mms
Z
Hahha becoz they want to raise emotions😂
@@indiantelanganite1933 eaaaaaaaaàaaßßsßsddffghhjk it's ya day a hi
U found that Shankaracharya dialogue was too hard!!
South India makes Movies like Action.
Mandan Mishr was a Brahman just like AdiShankarAcharya.
A Pleasant Shastrarth took place for Days. Thus, A Great Movie in Sanskrit from Kerala in Sanskrit AdiShankarAcharya to be Great.
Do not criticise South Indian movies just because of this movie. The Sanskrit movie on Shankaracharya was made by G.V Iyer who is a South Indian. Stop teasing South Indians. Anyways, did you even understand a single word in this😂
in this dialogue, i see the following things:
1. that women were as highly educated as men.
2. that even great scholars are prone to ego.
3. that scholarly debates are conducted under strict rules ensuring that the debaters do not lose their cool during the debate and it does not become a shouting match.
4. that the person sitting in the position of judge need not get up even if that person's husband is sitting. (as per the norms of the day, a wife was not expected to remain sitting when her husband had stood up)
5. that once a woman was given the position of the judge, she had to remain impartial no matter what.
6. that the debate was on dwaita-adwaita siddhantam; a very deep concept that could not be understood easily.
7. that all proofs had to be given using logic, reaasoning and solid proofs given in the vedic texts.
8. now, it will appear to be foolish, misleading and demeaning for the prestige of both Mandana Mishra and Adi Shankara. However, all i see is that it is a clash of titans - equally talented and highly learned men. I saw the Sanskrit version of the movie and i couldn't connect much to the scenes at all. the scene where the Chandala opens Asi Shankara's eyes was as bland as the debate scene between Mandana Mishra and Adi Shankara. for a layman, the Telugu vesrion is quite enlightening while the Sanskrit version doesn't tell him much. All i saw in the Sanskrit version was that a debate took place for 17 days. the actual debate was not shown - not even a few questions and answers that could shed some light on the nature of the debate.
Despite the overaction, this movie connects to the layman better than the Sanskrit version. I don't know about the technicalities of the movie or whether it is factually correct or whether it is misleading, but i was able to connect and understand why Adi Shankaracharya became so great.
Shankaracharya himself is a south indian
Nice sir 👌👌👌👌👌
Yenta manchi .. Vishayaniki paniki malina artist lu.. I am very sad.. I a shankaracharya cheppu dhulini..
Super movie Jai bolo Shenkar maharajki jai
Ambala Ajay ji
Reach
Only Telugu has such super devotional videos
I am Tamil little bit understanding 🙏🙏🙏🙏
Hare Srinivasa
Hello brother
Vadi acting entira babu. koushik babu
Malli cinimalu cheyaledu good keep it up
They attempted to deliver the concept with good motive but they could not deliver in correct content, We have to encourage with proper inputs to make it better
Super debate
Please include Subtitles...Thanks
Best scene in Jagadguru Adishankara
Subtitles would've helped a lot. Cuz i can't understand anything at all
Jai Sri Vishnu deva namah
Jai Sri maha Lakshmi devi namah
8:08 dailog meaning
Education and Knowledge brings serenity and compassion to one personality. Adi Sankracharya is a great name... The director and the actor totally unfairly portrayed Sri Sankracharya. Arrogance on both the characters. Even Mandan Mishra was not like that. Director totally missed the point.
Q
క్టక్టఃః కూడా
very true. The director totally missed the devine nature of the great Adi Shankara charya
Not education and knowlege, constant illumination of truth
,
👌 👌 supar
Om Nama shivaya hara hara mahadev shambho shankara
శృతి: స్మృతి: పురాణానామ్ ఆలయం కారుణాలయం నమామి భగవత్ పాద శంకరం లోక శంకరం...
NiThinkumar
This film was good
🆗🆙
but doesn't like this film
It is boring film
Story was
Boring
@@saradabaisaradabai9216 I respect your word. But I wish you should know snow about sankaracharya and the way he has chosen and what he actually fight for. I don't say it is the best one. But atleast he tried to his level to showup the things happened in his life
🙏🏻🚩🔱🙇om namo narayana 🙇🔱🚩🙏🏻
Namo Adishankra. Pls do it in English or hindi
amrutham visham manishi nundi ala puduthundhi ,,,,sir
but i love sai kumar acting.....really nice......
जय भोलेनाथ हर हर महादेव जय सोमनाथ जय भोलेनाथ हर हर महादेव जय सोमनाथ जय भोलेनाथ हर हर महादेव जय सोमनाथ जय भोलेनाथ हर हर महादेव जय सोमनाथ जय भोलेनाथ हर हर महादेव जय सोमनाथ जय भोलेनाथ हर हर महादेव जय सोमनाथ जय भोलेनाथ हर हर महादेव जय सोमनाथ
Jai ho
Ubhayabharathi🙏👌
Still GV Iyer Shankaracharya remains the best bio pic of this great sage.
@Amlesh ... there is no comparision between the 2. G V Iyer's movie is way ahead in every aspect.
We should not compare that with this. That movie is still and will be the greatest one on jagadguru.
@@aravindkumarramachandran6762 appriciated...👍
in this dialogue, i see the following things:
1. that women were as highly educated as men.
2. that even great scholars are prone to ego.
3. that scholarly debates are conducted under strict rules ensuring that the debaters do not lose their cool during the debate and it does not become a shouting match.
4. that the person sitting in the position of judge need not get up even if that person's husband is sitting. (as per the norms of the day, a wife was not expected to remain sitting when her husband had stood up)
5. that once a woman was given the position of the judge, she had to remain impartial no matter what.
6. that the debate was on dwaita-adwaita siddhantam; a very deep concept that could not be understood easily.
7. that all proofs had to be given using logic, reaasoning and solid proofs given in the vedic texts.
8. now, it will appear to be foolish, misleading and demeaning for the prestige of both Mandana Mishra and Adi Shankara. However, all i see is that it is a clash of titans - equally talented and highly learned men. I saw the Sanskrit version of the movie and i couldn't connect much to the scenes at all. the scene where the Chandala opens Asi Shankara's eyes was as bland as the debate scene between Mandana Mishra and Adi Shankara. for a layman, the Telugu vesrion is quite enlightening while the Sanskrit version doesn't tell him much. All i saw in the Sanskrit version was that a debate took place for 17 days. the actual debate was not shown - not even a few questions and answers that could shed some light on the nature of the debate.
Despite the overaction, this movie connects to the layman better than the Sanskrit version. I don't know about the technicalities of the movie or whether it is factually correct or whether it is misleading, but i was able to connect and understand why Adi Shankaracharya became so great.
Mandana Mishra became the first head of.the Sringeri peetham. He is shown like a buffoon here
कृपया इसका हिंदी रूपांतरण करने का कष्ट करें ओम नमः शिवाय
Waw amazing movie.....
Adi shankara my love ❤️🙏👍👏
Moral of this video is it is highly difficult and sometimes even impossible for the intelligent persons to win any arguement with fools.
moral of this video is it is highly impossible for telugu industry to direct a movie naturally. shankaracharya never shows anger or exaggeration on his face as he is a yogi. this video great insult to shankaracharya and mandara misra too. watch old shankaracharya movie and see the difference.
th-cam.com/video/aiwaoWcGtx8/w-d-xo.html
@@msc3329 you dont know fuck about telugu industry and the amazing mythology movies it has produced.
Super
sei
Boda Ashok hi
nice
*మనిషి తాను లోకం నుండి పొందిన అజ్ఞానం వదిలించు కోవడానికి, అనవసర ఆలోచనలు, అనవసర నమ్మకాల, విశ్వాసాల మరియు అనవసర సాధనాల నుండి ముక్తి పోవడానికి, సత్యజ్ఞానమైన సృష్టి జ్ఞానం పొందటమే ఆధారము. సృష్టిలో అన్ని మత గ్రంధాల, జగత్ గురువుల, ప్రవక్తల బోధనల సారం సైతం అదే. అయితే సత్య జ్ఞానాన్ని మరియు సత్య విషయం అయిన "నేను" " అహం" "I am" ని గ్రహించటం మాని, దానికి బదులు ఆ సత్యం బోధించిన వారిని పట్టుకుని వెలాడటమే లోకం లోని యుగయుగాల ఆధ్యాత్మిక అంధకారానికి మూలం. ఒక గ్రంథంలో ఒక సత్యం, మరొక గ్రంథంలో మరొక సత్యం , అలానే ఒక ప్రవక్త ఒక సత్యం, మరొక ప్రవక్త మరొక సత్యం చెప్పే అవకాశం సైతం సత్యంలో ఎప్పుడూ ఉండే అవకాశం సైతం ఉండదు. అంతర్ముఖం కాగలిగి ఎవరికి వారు తమ లోనే సత్యం పొందగలిగే మార్గమే నిజ సత్య మార్గం. నేనే సత్యం అహం బ్రహ్మాస్మి శివోహం. సత్య చోధనకు, సత్య సాధనకు ఈ సత్య అవగాహనే తాళం చెవి మరియు లోకంలోని సర్వ జీవుల మీద ప్రేమ, ఆప్యాయత, ఆత్మీయత కల్పించే ఏకైక ఆత్మ విశ్వాత్మ అయిన పరమాత్మ జ్ఞానం .*
Adi shankaracharya was never like this .
He was a sadhu by nature .
People prostrate before him not opposing him . They did argue with him but in an ethical way .!
But all these aren't found here 🙃😒😒😒😒
really sorry but this is an utter disgrace to adi shakaracharya
But the debate with Mandan Mishra was in a ethical way
Obsoletely right
How shallow one could get while presenting a story of a devine philosopher
BRAMANDAM
Baba na gurudeva saibaba nuvvu icche padhavitho naku తక్షణమే ధైర్యం vacchela cheyavalasindhiga na guruv SAIBABA parama pavithramina charanalanu sharanu vedukuntunnanu dhayachesi thakshaname ni dhigambara saibaba mora alakinchava baba please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Five Fingers Gurinchi answer cheppandayaaa....
Good
jabardasth vinod
No he is Kaushik babu
Please English subtitles,plz plz🙏🙏🙏🌺🌺
Ee scene goose bumps 👌👌👌
ಓಂ ನಮಃ ಶಿವಾಯ
❤❤❤say ❤❤❤
is this movie in hindi