Habitat 67 | Open House TV

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 62

  • @karenstrycharz1499
    @karenstrycharz1499 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    This is what I remember the most from this extraordinary fair! I went back in 1972 & thought this architecture was just as extraordinary as when I first saw it at the world’s fair! I always wanted to live here & remember walking underneath it, when I attended the fair & staring up at the building! Live thus structure & it looks just as modern, new & incredible as the first time I saw it! I always wanted to go into this place so thanks to this blog/video, I now get to view the inside! Thank-you so much for the best video/blog ever!

  • @Marchant2
    @Marchant2 5 ปีที่แล้ว +60

    Wouldn't it be nice if they built architecture like this for the average worker and not just for the rich or very well-off?

    • @Whammytap
      @Whammytap 4 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      Marchant2 That's the sad thing. This was intended for the average Joe, but construction costs were so high, it soon became apparent that it couldn't be so.

    • @shauncameron8390
      @shauncameron8390 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Namely rich and well-to-do men.

    • @Zoza15
      @Zoza15 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@Whammytap These modular housing idea still has to catch on, But who really wants to live in a brutalist styled apartment complex?..
      There are a lot more amazing ideas then Habitat 67 that most people aren´t aware off.

    • @Whammytap
      @Whammytap 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Zoza15 I'm sure that I have only scratched the surface when it comes to cool Brutalist architecture. :)

    • @123benny4
      @123benny4 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That's just what I wanted to say. It went into disrepair and nobody liked it but now the units are $1 million and more and only for rich people.

  • @alfredosabatian7024
    @alfredosabatian7024 6 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Very impeccable!! Now this is BOLD. Some people will hate it, some will love it. It's nothing in between! I love this!

    • @Sophia1a1
      @Sophia1a1 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I love it, love it, love it!!!!

    • @Zoza15
      @Zoza15 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      But as population grows, these types of housing solutions are inevitable..

    • @joeb5080
      @joeb5080 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Zoza15 Not sure how this architecture solves housing shortages, and traditional architecture doesn't.

  • @leciabella9461
    @leciabella9461 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    The staggered multi levels allows light to flow the the space. Very unique building... Luv to really see the structure better than how it was shown...

  • @JerryRiceBall
    @JerryRiceBall 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    1:09 I fuckin always knew it!! CARS DO DRIVE BACKWARDS IN CANADA!!!

  • @arricammarques1955
    @arricammarques1955 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Habitat 67 deserves to be expanded for every one.

  • @el_chico1313
    @el_chico1313 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    perfect parkour spot

  • @eoghanley
    @eoghanley ปีที่แล้ว

    « The sky is big » what sort of answer was he expecting for that 😂?

  • @KristianOye
    @KristianOye ปีที่แล้ว +1

    With modern "printed" and offsite prefab construction, it seems like this design philosophy is long overdue for a comeback.

  • @jayjayhooksch1
    @jayjayhooksch1 6 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    In desperate need of a power washing :S

  • @ominous-omnipresent-they
    @ominous-omnipresent-they 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Amazing.

  • @GoodKarma1020
    @GoodKarma1020 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Seen the building and it’s beautiful

  • @nate7817
    @nate7817 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    a glitch in the matrix

  • @SABOREAME68
    @SABOREAME68 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Lovely architecture, needless to say, as well as the inside decor ⭐️

    • @LanielPhoto
      @LanielPhoto 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I found the inside, specially those apartments without carpeting, to be cold, echoed, and "tinny". Even my voice echoed, and a dropped pencil could be heard 2 rooms over.

    • @SABOREAME68
      @SABOREAME68 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@LanielPhoto At this level, one has to take your word on your statement due to the fact that I never visited the apartments in person. Having said that, I hope they have taken care of the issues you claimed when you visited, for the sake of the actual tennants living there now.

    • @LanielPhoto
      @LanielPhoto 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@SABOREAME68 -Just go pay a visit if you can, and drop a pencil..... Carpeting seems to help, but then you have to vacuum. Still, a beautiful place to live.

    • @SABOREAME68
      @SABOREAME68 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@LanielPhoto I would, however, my medical career doesn't allow it at the moment. However, as I stated previously you guys seem to have witness it in person, therefore, I'll take your word. Stay Safe & Healthy.

  • @diegoolivares7856
    @diegoolivares7856 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Muy buena la nota y me sirve bastante para ver como viven ahi, lo bueno que esta funcionando todavía y el vecino tiene esa integración con el edificio muchas gracias saludos !

  • @HELIXGHOST
    @HELIXGHOST 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    30k a year in condo fees.

  • @LamaLo36
    @LamaLo36 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Exposed "brutalist" concrete: The perfect material for mold, dust, grime, smog and dirt to settle on.. The years have clearly not been kind to it!

  • @Zoza15
    @Zoza15 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    This could house a lot of people, with a hub space and balcony space and outside space for walking..

  • @nicholasschonerstedt2830
    @nicholasschonerstedt2830 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    What's the white circle in the beginning

  • @honestabe1940
    @honestabe1940 ปีที่แล้ว

    If they built apartments like that out of precast concrete, strong and very sound deadening, only the wealthy could afford the rent!!

  • @divya2677
    @divya2677 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice 👌

  • @conveyor2
    @conveyor2 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wrong. The Canadian pavilion was the "inverted pyramid" on Ile Notre Dame!

  • @JudgeDredd_
    @JudgeDredd_ 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    My friend lives there. He’s a boxer.

  • @1249MARIO
    @1249MARIO 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I find it a bit cluttered! Oh well!

  • @deiniolbythynnwr926
    @deiniolbythynnwr926 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ugly building but I respect the creativity.

  • @devonrusinek5807
    @devonrusinek5807 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Cool design, but this has nothing on Singapore's Interlace.

  • @patdaley7832
    @patdaley7832 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Every terrace is open to the sky....and your neighbors. So much for privacy outside when you want to sit and relax.

  • @evabragha9100
    @evabragha9100 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I don't want to offend but it Looks like a favela 😞

  • @rr7firefly
    @rr7firefly 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Looks like the HOA does not allow anyone to have a patio umbrella on their terrace. And for good reason. After a while it would be impossible to regulate the wild assortment of sizes, colors and patterns. Habitat would look like a trailer park.

  • @josephang9927
    @josephang9927 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    A nightmare

  • @KotleKettle
    @KotleKettle 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This house looks disgusting. Brutalism was a huge mistake.

  • @xcx23cwea65
    @xcx23cwea65 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    ITS 11 UGLINESS ARCHITECTURE IN THE WORLD. SO SPARE ME ALL YOUR FLUFF TALK

  • @rentboy7566
    @rentboy7566 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Awful architecture. We have a few of these concrete caverns here in downtown Chicago and they are among the cheapest per square foot in the city. No one wants to live in these concrete caves.

    • @frodovan
      @frodovan 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      No one what’s to live in Chicago.

    • @rentboy7566
      @rentboy7566 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@frodovan ..... you’re not qualified to say that

    • @alexseguin5245
      @alexseguin5245 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Apparently many want to. Everyone who lives in habitat 67 loves it. We need more building like this, it's beautiful!

  • @macseagle5968
    @macseagle5968 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This seems like a comune for wealthy gay men.

  • @terrybear5398
    @terrybear5398 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Post Modern Crap!

    • @mrRnf11
      @mrRnf11 6 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Lol. Moshe Safdie is a Modernist architect, and very much a hater of the Post-modern movement. Your comment is therefore not just wrong but dumb.

    • @terrybear5398
      @terrybear5398 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      It's still ugly.

    • @conveyor2
      @conveyor2 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@terrybear5398 Are tower blocks not ugly?

    • @alexseguin5245
      @alexseguin5245 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@terrybear5398 Way better than just about any other regular housing building!