I recall watching something about this in the past, if I recall correctly that the reason why maglev hasn't taken off yet is the track & maglev train construction costs are astronomical in comparison to other current modes.
Yeah, that's exactly the reason. The infrastructure required is prohibitively expensive. And when switches get involved things become outright absurd. The next issue is maintenance cost. With trains going 500 km/h you really have to make sure everything is in top notch condition all the time. The Japanese managed to pull it off once already putting the Shinkansen on the track when nobody believed in a future for rail. It will be really interesting to see if they can do it a second time.
@@GudieveNing Maybe when you're only talking about 300 miles between a the largest city in the world and the 19th largest city in the world (which is the second largest city in Japan), it makes more sense, but when you start to extrapolate it to a place like America, or even a place like the United Kingdom or France, it's really obvious that this will never see a return on investment. It's just impractical.
Yeah they said that about their cities they were building and telling their citizens to invest since it’s a communist state and not capitalist the person making these structures has no incentive to make it well other than a gun to his head I bet this train bridge crumbles in the next decade
Well, the cost of maintaining all the rails and sleepers, plus recompressing the gravel could fall away and since the track doesn't actually have contact and salt probably not being used there in contrast to roads, I think that makes sense from an infrastructure perspective, don't know about the rolling stock however. PS: hope I translated these words somewhat correctly into English 😅
@@b_uppy haha at that point they'd need to install some sort of transparent tubes halfway filled with water, all over the train...just to be able to demonstrate to customers that they are smoother although you can't feel any difference
@b_uppy have you ridden in the Madrid one? I really don't think you'd be able to tell the difference, as in, you wouldn't feel like you were moving in either.
@@theneighbourkid actually I'm no longer in college, but when I was it took that long, because the distance from home to college was like 27km/16miles, and I used two buses
Japan can afford cutting edge train technology but we (United States) can't. Sounds like politicians and their friends are pocketing all out money folks
I saw the maglev test run in Yamanashi last April in Japan. It's awesome! And I also remember when I was in 4th year highschool in the Philippines, my physics teacher mentioned this maglev project in Japan that time. That's the first time i heard it. Imagine up to now Japan is still working on it. I'm 34 years old now. Japan is really thinking way ahead of time 👌🏽💯😊
@@4.0.4it’s more the result of lobbying from oil and gas companies, as well as Elon’s hyper loop disaster which never got beyond prototype before it went bankrupt, siphoning money and interest away from rail projects
If America had a high speed rail it would open up so many possibilities, imagine getting up in the morning going to rail station and taking a train some 400 miles in under and hour, go to work, get off and take the train home. A person could technically live in NC and have a job NY or Philly or maybe even Ga.
Not only bad math skills ... but ... Just stupid. If you all would buy me a concord, I could live in Alaska and commute to Argentina to work. Cost be damned. Idiot priviledge at work.
Very few would actually want to do that though. Sounds exotic at first, but it will definitely lose that appeal when you are running late and don't want to miss the ride over. Public transportation cannot take off until proper walking* infrastructure is put in place. They go hand in hand, and without the other they will be greatly impractical.
@@midgetman4206in countries that actually use public transport (probably every country except USA) commutes of 1 hour are normal. You get to live somewhere relatively pleasant while still working in commercial zones.
@@midgetman4206I agree public transport requires infrastructure, most of which is more public transport to your final destination. There is no point a train dumping you in the middle of a city if you then have to walk 10 miles to your place of work or a cab costs twice what the train cost.
that literally sounds like the worst possible thing ever. Why would I ever choose to take a train over driving? When using trains, you’re on everyone else’s schedule. You are surrounded by people who can’t afford cars. You can only go A to B. You can’t stop when and if you need to. They are dumb loud and annoying (I work a good 15 minute drive away from the nearest train station, and every time a train pulls in to the station 3 miles away we can hear and feel it. There is a train track running through the next town over from where I live, a commuter rail, and every time that thing passes by IN THE NEXT TOWN OVER MULTIPLE MILES AWAY, the ground shakes and it sounds like thunder storm that blows train wistles. Train stations to take up space that could be used for personal vehicle infrastructure. Train tracks are pointless, and are all abandoned at some point in the US, in other words, we should just get rid of them all now. If you want a shitty train network, go live in Europe. There is nothing stopping you from pretending to be a 19th century english peasant who’s kids died from measles and polio, in Europe.
I rode the Shanghai Maglev and it was very smooth. true its really short and should be extended to the Shanghai highspeed rail station but its a good proof of concept. Meanwhile the USA has exactly 0 trains running at or above 200km/hr
That's funny - i rode it in January (it has been limited to 300km/h, not sure since when), and I was surpriced that it was less smooth than the "traditional" highspeed trains, which also do 300km/h
@@garyoak2974 surprisingly this LA/Vegas route has a greater chance of success and finishing on time than the bigger budget LA to Frisco $100 Billion debacle. If it does indeed happen I'll fly out to LA just to try it for a holiday in Vegas.
@@martinfisker7438 maybe they had to do maintenance on it. you should try it again now. MagLev will always be smoother because its not actually touching the track.
When the late Sir Eric Laithwaite invented the linear motor all those years ago, he thought it would revolutionise transport. He was wrong in that, but what that technology did give us was roller coasters with unbelievable uphill acceleration.
The Shanghai Maglev during certain times in the day goes at 431 kph and during other times at 300 kph. With the 431 kph it is the world's fastest land vehicle accessible to the public. That's nice but at the moment, Maglev technology isn't widely used yet and it's hard to predict the future. Let's hope that all engineers working on transport quickly make faster land travel possible for more people
The jealous narrator snarkily giggled that the only-commercial 30km maglev "defeats the purpose"....total disrespect for China taking the initiative to help advance the technology.
@@xaiano794I went there 3 weeks ago, the maglev is cool but honestly it feels like any regular train, it very good accel but it cruises at around the same speed as regular Chinese High Speed Rail. But I do recommend at least checking it out
So, from the inspiration of the German transrapid-train the United States (HSGT-Program) and Japan the „better“ invention »JR-Maglev« was developed in Japan.
The reason why we have few Maglevs is because of the infrastructure not the trains themselves, all the railroad tracks that's been already set needs to be redesigned to accommodate it. It's going to be financially astronomical to replace all of it, specially that the current tracks work just fine
They wouldn’t replace existing tracks. Normal tracks are too bendy and not safe enough (animals can get on the tracks which would have a disastrous effect at 500km/h). The design of maglev means they can only ever be their own dedicated infrastructure rather than an upgrade/direct replacement of conventional rail. The catcher is they cost a fortune to build and maintain.
Current tracks need to be replaced for high-speed rail as well. The lower cost for traditional rail assumed a utilisation of existing tracks. If you compare maglev (at least TransRapid) costs to new build high speed rail they’re roughly equal, and can be cheaper under some circumstances, because the maglev can accommodate up to 10% inclines.
@@wompstopm123 Yeah. I was in the US a few months ago. The level of poverty and lack of trust was quite disconcerting when I've been there. I remember struggling with getting fuel when I realised you have to pay first or it won't pump.
@@letsburn00 you just get a credit card and use it for everything. the chip on the card makes transactions instant. goofy goobers are always counting their nickels and im over here spending money i dont even have to buy whatever i want.
I would LOVE a Mag-Lift system that can go from Florida to Maine and Back. Like imagine being able to go from Key Largo in Florida to Caribou, Maine within 4 hours?
Even if they had this just in Florida it would make a world of difference. It's a long state, and the distance around the Everglades from Miami to Tampa or Orlando would be significantly reduced so much; the positive benefits would be numerous.
@@volvo09Japan is also very long. When compared to the U.S., Hokkaido to Kyushu is roughly equivalent to the distance from Maine to Georgia; that being said, a connection between Tokyo and Osaka is equivalent to roughly Los Angeles and Sacramento, or Boston to Trenton
@@convenientplayer1447LA to Sacramento is quite substantially longer than Tokyo to Osaka. It's an extra 75 miles, nearly 30% longer. Now we need to understand that the distance from San Diego to Seattle is 1250 miles, and the distance from LA to NYC is 2800 miles, and we can see why it is that maglev trains cannot reasonably be built in the US.
It’s actually less about aerodynamics but more for noise when entering and exiting tunnels. The train would be just as fast with a less impressive nose but similar to the regular bullet trains, the noise complaints were a huge issue back in the day.
What's crazy is that 500kmph is like 60% of the speed commercial airliners fly at. Given how time consuming it is to check in the baggage and go through security, this is going to be so much faster. Also safer and good for the environment. Win-win-win, no matter the initial cost.
My understanding is the U.S. initially proposed Maglev technology for high speed trains in the 1960s, but was stymied by expenditures for the Conflict in Vietnam and other priorities
i read it somewhere that shanghai maglev started with a top speed over 300km/h. However, due to the deterioration of the tracks and the train, now it can only run at the speed below 200km/h. I am curious about how Japanese is going to deal with this issue considering the enormous cost of the maglev transportation.
I don't think a 30km track defeats the purpose. I was actually in Shanghai in 2019 and being able to go from the city to the airport in just 8 minutes was incredible. It was also a kind of tourist attraction.
Works best though for places like Japan cause they have such a good Railways infrastructure (also the trains run on time), America is built around cars
"This is merely superconductor electromagnetism. Surely you've heard of it. It levitates bullet trains from Tokyo to Osaka. It levitates my desk, where I ride the saddle of the world. And it levitates... me!"
I remember in 5th grade I had to do a project on what I thought a part of my town would look like in 2035 and make a model of it. I got the train station and I made the train magnetic levitation. I love that it's actually happening somewhere in the world.
Just like Monorails, Maglev trains do not have the ability to switch tracks if they need to. This really limits their construction to just two end connecting points or an enclosed loop.
I would think the super conductor would be on the train itself because of the cryo cooling and the logistics for the track to be it would be quite expensive
One question... once it reaches top speed how long does it take to slow down? I only ask because it wouldn't be feasible having too many stops along the way.
There are only a few stops on the whole Tokyo-Osaka route. The route is much more direct than the existing Shinkansen route, so there aren't much cities on the route. The main city on the way will be Kyoto.
@imrevadasz1086 actually it will only 9 stations and be built in a different route through the mountains. With stops the planned travel time to osaka, the terminus, will be 67 minutes at a speed of 505kph
So... build more nuclear power plants? Also, I highly doubt it would take the whole power plant. Maglev seems to take 1-2 kW per ton, and a nuclear power plant puts out on the order of 1,000,000 kW. So, unless the train weighs more than two Burj Khalifas...
@@jpheitman1 Also, should the individual train cars themselves be fashioned from sufficiently light weight materials, and the coils within can be made from graphene instead of copper, the train itself might not require as much energy just to get going.
Debunked many times. Nuclear is one of the safest and greenest ways to generate power. Look up the statistics. Modern nuclear power plants are designed to prevent meltdowns. Even the couple older designs that melted down did so because of human error. Fukushima melted down because it was in a bad location that was vulnerable to tsunamis. The disposal of waste has been solved for decades. Theres just too much fear mongering around it and therefore too much red tape.
Meanwhile, here in California, supposedly the technology center of the world, we still don’t even have any high-speed rail despite a lot of promises and a lot of $$ spent.
I’m betting the issue with maglevs is the cost to build them. Rich people don’t give a crap about the environment. They only care about profit. If there’s any doubt about whether they can turn a profit, they’ll be averse to -taking the risk-.
It‘s actually german technology, „transrapid“ which got cancelled in germany because of a crash due to maintaining the track without stopping the transrapid!
No, it didnt get cancelled because of the crash with a maintanance vehicle. The crash happened in 2006, development continued until 2011 when it was deemed finished and the license for the test track ran out. The planned projects just failed on a political level
Easily over even longer distances since you don't have to spend time boarding like you do with a plane. For example Houston to new York would take roughly 5h on a maglev service, with stops. Flights are scheduled to do it in 3h35m but then you have to add the time waiting at the airport to check in and to retrieve your luggage at the other end. The other bonus is you could have intermediate stops
@@xaiano794 Wot? You still have to have people board the train, and if you're going cross country, you'll have to load cargo, too. If we're assuming straight shots with no stops (bold, with a cross-country train), then the passenger jet will get there in about half the time. If we have to start accounting for stops, the train is going to take even longer, because your Houston to NYC train line is probably going to Kansas City first, and it's probably stopping at a few stops between Kansas City and Houston as well, and from Kansas City it's probably going to DC, and hitting a few stops between there, too, and then it will probably be stopping at Philadelphia before it hits NYC.
@brofist1959 I already accounted for stops and boarding a train takes roughly 2 minutes although most time tables account for 5. I'm pretty certain you haven't arrived at an airport 5 minutes before your flight and left on time. I strongly recommend you try traveling on Japanese trains before you make your judgements as you'd understand how much faster high speed trains are
@@xaiano794 In my experience, it's prudent to add 2 airport hours to flight time when comparing to rail. That being said, 500km/h makes sense for very long distance travel, above 300 miles, and by that point air travel has time to make up the lost airport time. A slower, cheaper alternative would make much more sense to me. With an average speed of 300 km/h, and maybe peaks of 400, you could travel 4500 km in 15 hours. With seating comfortable enough to sleep well, I can see myself opting for that instead of a 5.5 hour flight plus 2 hours airport time. In other words, I think that a lot of fast trains will do more good than a few record breaking ones.
@SalveMonesvol you're 100% right that international and very long distances will always be better by air but medium distances (up to 3000km) would be better by maglev, and even high speed rail as things like weight of baggage wouldn't be an issue, plus with rail you can have terminus stations either in or beneath cities rather than far out in the suburbs. Initial construction costs of such projects are always going to be massive, but they are one off costs and can carry huge numbers of passengers
@@maxjing61 No you’re completely wrong. The U.S World and News Report rated Japan as number 1 in technological expertise. DataPandas rated Japan as the most technologically advanced country in the world. GeeksforGeeks rated Japan as the leading country in technology and robotics. I’ve been to Japan, and the Japanese technology was absolutely amazing! So there you go, Japan is the leading country in technology and robotics. 🇯🇵
Cherry picking biased commercial rankings to support your ill defined bias of what most technologically advanced even means. Name one world leader from Japan in true future leading technologies like AI, electric vehicles, big data, renewal energy, and even specifically robotics, that you so admantly stressed, can you name but one?
Could have been reality in Germany in the 80s. The Transrapid Hit 450 km/h in the Kate 80s but was abolished and sold to china (it’s the train in Shanghai you see in this video) due to political mistakes and lack of knowledge of the decision makers
As much as I maglev technology to advance I also wonder the practicality of a nation so prone to earthquakes being the one to shoulder the development costs
This tech had been around a long time. Since they have an aging populace, having public transport becomes more important for accessibility for young people as well as to support young people starting out. They also prioritize productivity and the smooth ride allows work on the train, as well as enhanced speed. For them the value is irreplaceable.
"...in any weather conditions" I didn't think ice would be nice to build up under the train. High wind from the side could also be terribly complicated. Hail would suck. A hurricane or tornado might be a bit of a problem, though you might be able to outrun one. 🌀 🌪️ 🚆
I just traveled from Memphis to Dallas in under an hour last Thursday. It was aboard this futuristic aluminum tube way up in the sky. Can’t remember what it’s called though. Maybe it was a train.
@@BM-13_KATYUSHATry it on a normal train going a tenth of the speed, heck try whole damn loaded trucks, and get back to us when they stop ripping apart like tissue paper on contact
@@lonestarr1490 I don't specifically remember which cities. But China has talked about it multiple times, Japan a few times, even the U.S. keeps throwing it around.
Why? At that speed and size, it would obliterate the rock. And no one would feel it. Unless it’s a boulder. But that’s straight sabotage at that point.
Most of that money is not actual money, but just the estimated cost of the equipment being sent. Most of which is old and costs money to store. A lot of it would eventually cost a lot of money to safely decommission
lmao. california high speed rail project started 16 years ago, i'm sure the ukraine war happened 16 years ago as well. america just can't build mega infrastructure like asian countries
Operate in “any” weather condition ? I uth a mere 10 cm clearance how will it handle Strong Gusts of cross wind that might try to till , or snow drifts that is more than 10 cm high.
@@herobrine1847 I think the same, since i was a teenager. In ‚urban areas‘ and from city to city it is the best way to travel by train … even for commuting 👍🏼✨
I recall watching something about this in the past, if I recall correctly that the reason why maglev hasn't taken off yet is the track & maglev train construction costs are astronomical in comparison to other current modes.
Yeah, that's exactly the reason. The infrastructure required is prohibitively expensive. And when switches get involved things become outright absurd.
The next issue is maintenance cost. With trains going 500 km/h you really have to make sure everything is in top notch condition all the time.
The Japanese managed to pull it off once already putting the Shinkansen on the track when nobody believed in a future for rail. It will be really interesting to see if they can do it a second time.
Yup, it’s basically a miles long linear motor.
Cheaper to fly.
Bearing in mind that existing high speed rails are already massively expensive to build
@@GudieveNing Maybe when you're only talking about 300 miles between a the largest city in the world and the 19th largest city in the world (which is the second largest city in Japan), it makes more sense, but when you start to extrapolate it to a place like America, or even a place like the United Kingdom or France, it's really obvious that this will never see a return on investment. It's just impractical.
Fact checking that "lower maintenance cost" would be highly advised
Yeah they said that about their cities they were building and telling their citizens to invest since it’s a communist state and not capitalist the person making these structures has no incentive to make it well other than a gun to his head I bet this train bridge crumbles in the next decade
Maintenance could theoretically be very inexpensive but the price to operate it will increase.
Much cheaper than tens of thousands of cars and hundreds of miles of roads, accidents, ER, enforcement, etc
@@xx133 but it's an upfront fee
Well, the cost of maintaining all the rails and sleepers, plus recompressing the gravel could fall away and since the track doesn't actually have contact and salt probably not being used there in contrast to roads, I think that makes sense from an infrastructure perspective, don't know about the rolling stock however.
PS: hope I translated these words somewhat correctly into English 😅
I just went from Barcelona to Madrid and back on an AVE train doing 300 kph on conventional rails. Smooth as glass.
This would be smoother.
NO THANKS 2 BOTH!
@@b_uppy haha at that point they'd need to install some sort of transparent tubes halfway filled with water, all over the train...just to be able to demonstrate to customers that they are smoother although you can't feel any difference
@@R0DSTER
So you say...
@b_uppy have you ridden in the Madrid one? I really don't think you'd be able to tell the difference, as in, you wouldn't feel like you were moving in either.
30 km in 8 mins is pretty darn impressive!
I think that's the minimum these trains go I guess.
I'm imagining reaching my college in 8 mins instead of an hour and half 😮
That's like 1 km in 20 seconds 😳
@@pixelforg Are you cycling to college?
@@theneighbourkid actually I'm no longer in college, but when I was it took that long, because the distance from home to college was like 27km/16miles, and I used two buses
Meanwhile Melbourne Australia has a mere 60km long train normal track project planned to finish 50 Years in the future
😂
“Rail wasn’t built in a day” - some Australian in the future
See? The Hyperloop does exist! Just without the stupid tube, and with more passengers. 😉👍
Hyperloop uses completely different approach,it uses pressure
@@kaiserwhence2468 Eh, no it doesn't, because it doesn't actually exist.
@@mururoa7024 yeah lol
@@kaiserwhence2468the Hyperloop is an idea from 1799 originally referred to as the Vactrain. No one has built one, because it isn't safe.
@@mururoa7024it does exist, just not yet at commercial scale. Current estimates are 2030 for the first commercial link.
Chicago needs these!
*cries in American Amtrak
It would cost Amtrak at least $200 billion to switch to Maglevs that’s almost as much as the US has given Ukraine
@@levismith7444we should do that instead of giving it to Ukraine lol
Maybe start upgrading your conventional rails first (as well as raildroad security policies)
@@levismith7444seems more beneficial
@@dylpickel8460 We are permanently run by dumb elites
Japan can afford cutting edge train technology but we (United States) can't. Sounds like politicians and their friends are pocketing all out money folks
I saw the maglev test run in Yamanashi last April in Japan. It's awesome! And I also remember when I was in 4th year highschool in the Philippines, my physics teacher mentioned this maglev project in Japan that time. That's the first time i heard it. Imagine up to now Japan is still working on it. I'm 34 years old now. Japan is really thinking way ahead of time 👌🏽💯😊
Japan unlocking public 300mph Maglev lines. USA still working at 75mph Amtrak on standard gauge.
With Department of Transportation headed by "experts" like Pete Buttigieg, you don't need natural disasters.
@@4.0.4it’s more the result of lobbying from oil and gas companies, as well as Elon’s hyper loop disaster which never got beyond prototype before it went bankrupt, siphoning money and interest away from rail projects
@@4.0.4Oh for heavens' sake. We've underinvested in Amtrak since it was founded in 1971.
@@TheNinthGenerarion Siphoning money from who?
That’s roughly 311 MPH for those wondering.
Thank you
Yep... pretty fast. Gonna be ugly the first time one derails.
The vast majority of the world wasn't.
in freedom units*
Miles... pfft
If America had a high speed rail it would open up so many possibilities, imagine getting up in the morning going to rail station and taking a train some 400 miles in under and hour, go to work, get off and take the train home.
A person could technically live in NC and have a job NY or Philly or maybe even Ga.
Not only bad math skills ... but ...
Just stupid. If you all would buy me a concord, I could live in Alaska and commute to Argentina to work. Cost be damned. Idiot priviledge at work.
Very few would actually want to do that though. Sounds exotic at first, but it will definitely lose that appeal when you are running late and don't want to miss the ride over.
Public transportation cannot take off until proper walking* infrastructure is put in place. They go hand in hand, and without the other they will be greatly impractical.
@@midgetman4206in countries that actually use public transport (probably every country except USA) commutes of 1 hour are normal. You get to live somewhere relatively pleasant while still working in commercial zones.
@@midgetman4206I agree public transport requires infrastructure, most of which is more public transport to your final destination.
There is no point a train dumping you in the middle of a city if you then have to walk 10 miles to your place of work or a cab costs twice what the train cost.
that literally sounds like the worst possible thing ever. Why would I ever choose to take a train over driving?
When using trains, you’re on everyone else’s schedule. You are surrounded by people who can’t afford cars. You can only go A to B. You can’t stop when and if you need to. They are dumb loud and annoying (I work a good 15 minute drive away from the nearest train station, and every time a train pulls in to the station 3 miles away we can hear and feel it. There is a train track running through the next town over from where I live, a commuter rail, and every time that thing passes by IN THE NEXT TOWN OVER MULTIPLE MILES AWAY, the ground shakes and it sounds like thunder storm that blows train wistles. Train stations to take up space that could be used for personal vehicle infrastructure. Train tracks are pointless, and are all abandoned at some point in the US, in other words, we should just get rid of them all now.
If you want a shitty train network, go live in Europe.
There is nothing stopping you from pretending to be a 19th century english peasant who’s kids died from measles and polio, in Europe.
Can't imagine if somebody was just on the railroad, wouldn't even see it coming, would just turn to mist
I rode the Shanghai Maglev and it was very smooth. true its really short and should be extended to the Shanghai highspeed rail station but its a good proof of concept.
Meanwhile the USA has exactly 0 trains running at or above 200km/hr
Just broke ground today on a los angeles to vegas train wait 4 years for it to open.
That's funny - i rode it in January (it has been limited to 300km/h, not sure since when), and I was surpriced that it was less smooth than the "traditional" highspeed trains, which also do 300km/h
@@garyoak2974 surprisingly this LA/Vegas route has a greater chance of success and finishing on time than the bigger budget LA to Frisco $100 Billion debacle. If it does indeed happen I'll fly out to LA just to try it for a holiday in Vegas.
@@martinfisker7438 maybe they had to do maintenance on it. you should try it again now. MagLev will always be smoother because its not actually touching the track.
US doesn't need trains cuz we have planes. Trains r for the poor or for goods and transports..
Meanwhile. US roads are full of potholes, our bridges are collapsing, and our passenger trIns are a pathetic joke.
at least theres food!
oh wait, a hambuger costs 30 now...
😂😂😂Me an indian reading this🤣🤣🤣
Ukraine and Israel would like to thank you for your donation 😅
but what about the food tho
Our passenger trins ARE pathetic. 🤓
When the late Sir Eric Laithwaite invented the linear motor all those years ago, he thought it would revolutionise transport. He was wrong in that, but what that technology did give us was roller coasters with unbelievable uphill acceleration.
It was him who started it. Unfortunately he's unavailable to finish it off.
The Shanghai Maglev during certain times in the day goes at 431 kph and during other times at 300 kph. With the 431 kph it is the world's fastest land vehicle accessible to the public. That's nice but at the moment, Maglev technology isn't widely used yet and it's hard to predict the future. Let's hope that all engineers working on transport quickly make faster land travel possible for more people
The jealous narrator snarkily giggled that the only-commercial 30km maglev "defeats the purpose"....total disrespect for China taking the initiative to help advance the technology.
CCP BOTS DETECTED
^Zionazist drone
Strictly speaking the Japanese one is accessible to the public on occasion even though it's not a commercial service, and routinely exceeds 500kph
@@gotmilk91 It uses German Transrapid technology, but we should give credit to the Chinese for funding it.
The Maglev Train from Shanghai was originally developed in Germany, see "Transrapid" 🙂
I'm going there in a few weeks
@@xaiano794I went there 3 weeks ago, the maglev is cool but honestly it feels like any regular train, it very good accel but it cruises at around the same speed as regular Chinese High Speed Rail. But I do recommend at least checking it out
#transrapid 😮
There is a substantial difference between „maglev“ and „transrapid“. Ask ChatGPT, I have learned a lot from this video and A.I. 🎉
So, from the inspiration of the German transrapid-train the United States (HSGT-Program) and Japan the „better“ invention »JR-Maglev« was developed in Japan.
Human railgun
Shout out to the cameraman for keeping up
The reason why we have few Maglevs is because of the infrastructure not the trains themselves, all the railroad tracks that's been already set needs to be redesigned to accommodate it. It's going to be financially astronomical to replace all of it, specially that the current tracks work just fine
They wouldn’t replace existing tracks. Normal tracks are too bendy and not safe enough (animals can get on the tracks which would have a disastrous effect at 500km/h).
The design of maglev means they can only ever be their own dedicated infrastructure rather than an upgrade/direct replacement of conventional rail. The catcher is they cost a fortune to build and maintain.
Current tracks need to be replaced for high-speed rail as well. The lower cost for traditional rail assumed a utilisation of existing tracks. If you compare maglev (at least TransRapid) costs to new build high speed rail they’re roughly equal, and can be cheaper under some circumstances, because the maglev can accommodate up to 10% inclines.
Japan : our trains don’t even touch the ground and stay on the track
USA : our trains fall off the track at 40 mph and a slight turn
only in japan where people are not gonna steal the copper can you have this luxury
Not only Japan... but yes, not many places where that wouldn't happen.
Wait, you live in a country where people would steal the Copper? That's not an issue in most countries.
@@letsburn00 yes i live in america. people will steal your car parts such as your catalytic converter and hub caps.
@@wompstopm123 Yeah. I was in the US a few months ago. The level of poverty and lack of trust was quite disconcerting when I've been there. I remember struggling with getting fuel when I realised you have to pay first or it won't pump.
@@letsburn00 you just get a credit card and use it for everything. the chip on the card makes transactions instant. goofy goobers are always counting their nickels and im over here spending money i dont even have to buy whatever i want.
I saw part of this maglev track running past Mt Fuji. Can't wait to ride it someday 🚄
I would LOVE a Mag-Lift system that can go from Florida to Maine and Back. Like imagine being able to go from Key Largo in Florida to Caribou, Maine within 4 hours?
Even if they had this just in Florida it would make a world of difference. It's a long state, and the distance around the Everglades from Miami to Tampa or Orlando would be significantly reduced so much; the positive benefits would be numerous.
that is a massive distance... Japan is extremely small compared to the US.
Half of Florida is going to be underwater in 100 years. The Governor everglades' restoration is actually a sea level rise prevention project.
@@volvo09Japan is also very long. When compared to the U.S., Hokkaido to Kyushu is roughly equivalent to the distance from Maine to Georgia; that being said, a connection between Tokyo and Osaka is equivalent to roughly Los Angeles and Sacramento, or Boston to Trenton
@@convenientplayer1447LA to Sacramento is quite substantially longer than Tokyo to Osaka. It's an extra 75 miles, nearly 30% longer.
Now we need to understand that the distance from San Diego to Seattle is 1250 miles, and the distance from LA to NYC is 2800 miles, and we can see why it is that maglev trains cannot reasonably be built in the US.
Why is the front look have the shape of a freaking platypus head?
Aerodynamics. If they were flatfaced, the windshield would break because of the wind
That’s actually pretty interesting.
Or a shoe.
It’s actually less about aerodynamics but more for noise when entering and exiting tunnels. The train would be just as fast with a less impressive nose but similar to the regular bullet trains, the noise complaints were a huge issue back in the day.
A platypus train?
_puts on a fedora_
*PERRY THE PLATYPUS TRAIN?!*
What's crazy is that 500kmph is like 60% of the speed commercial airliners fly at. Given how time consuming it is to check in the baggage and go through security, this is going to be so much faster. Also safer and good for the environment.
Win-win-win, no matter the initial cost.
My understanding is the U.S. initially proposed Maglev technology for high speed trains in the 1960s, but was stymied by expenditures for the Conflict in Vietnam and other priorities
Superconductors? It will never be built.
i read it somewhere that shanghai maglev started with a top speed over 300km/h. However, due to the deterioration of the tracks and the train, now it can only run at the speed below 200km/h. I am curious about how Japanese is going to deal with this issue considering the enormous cost of the maglev transportation.
I was on it a few weeks ago and it ran at 300km according to the display. and it's all outside unlike the japan one will be
It used to run over 400kph (283mph top be precise) but they slowed it to 182mph (300kph)
That's not a maglev issue, it's a CCP issue.
@@xaiano794 when I was on it. It got up to 511 km/h.
@@b_uppyAlmost 100mil people, a real democracy with material freedoms
I don't think a 30km track defeats the purpose. I was actually in Shanghai in 2019 and being able to go from the city to the airport in just 8 minutes was incredible. It was also a kind of tourist attraction.
Trains are much more efficient for mass transit than planes. That’s a fact.
Works best though for places like Japan cause they have such a good Railways infrastructure (also the trains run on time), America is built around cars
What happens if a bird decides to peck on the tracks.
"This is merely superconductor electromagnetism. Surely you've heard of it. It levitates bullet trains from Tokyo to Osaka. It levitates my desk, where I ride the saddle of the world. And it levitates... me!"
I remember in 5th grade I had to do a project on what I thought a part of my town would look like in 2035 and make a model of it. I got the train station and I made the train magnetic levitation. I love that it's actually happening somewhere in the world.
Just like Monorails, Maglev trains do not have the ability to switch tracks if they need to. This really limits their construction to just two end connecting points or an enclosed loop.
THIS IS SOO COOL! No vibration or movement can be felt probably, smooth ride all the way to your location.
“All the coolest stuff is made-in-Japan” Marty McFly
I went from Narita airport to Tokyo in 15 min. At some point I couldn't hear anything when the train was moving. Amazing 🤩
There is no bullet train from Tokyo to Narita. The fast train to Narita is an hour. I don't know what you are smoking
@@karllee4250 I was going from Narita to Tokyo not other way around. And I didn't say it was a bullet train
You most probably arrived in Haneda then and mistook the Haneda monorail for a maglev ;)
Amazing Japanese
I would think the super conductor would be on the train itself because of the cryo cooling and the logistics for the track to be it would be quite expensive
One question... once it reaches top speed how long does it take to slow down? I only ask because it wouldn't be feasible having too many stops along the way.
They accelerate and brake faster than regular trains. Source - I'm a train driver
There are only a few stops on the whole Tokyo-Osaka route. The route is much more direct than the existing Shinkansen route, so there aren't much cities on the route. The main city on the way will be Kyoto.
@imrevadasz1086 actually it will only 9 stations and be built in a different route through the mountains. With stops the planned travel time to osaka, the terminus, will be 67 minutes at a speed of 505kph
Not to mention it requires a nuclear power plant to run it.
I always notice they neglect to mention power consumption.
Minor detail.
So... build more nuclear power plants?
Also, I highly doubt it would take the whole power plant. Maglev seems to take 1-2 kW per ton, and a nuclear power plant puts out on the order of 1,000,000 kW. So, unless the train weighs more than two Burj Khalifas...
@@jpheitman1 Also, should the individual train cars themselves be fashioned from sufficiently light weight materials, and the coils within can be made from graphene instead of copper, the train itself might not require as much energy just to get going.
Where is the issue with that?
@@ArtificialGamingIntelligence it’s not worth irradiating the planet in order to get around it faster
Debunked many times. Nuclear is one of the safest and greenest ways to generate power. Look up the statistics. Modern nuclear power plants are designed to prevent meltdowns. Even the couple older designs that melted down did so because of human error. Fukushima melted down because it was in a bad location that was vulnerable to tsunamis. The disposal of waste has been solved for decades. Theres just too much fear mongering around it and therefore too much red tape.
So many intellectually incompetent people in the comments right now.
They've been saying this for decades. It's beset with gremlins.
Exciting... Beautiful!!!
Meanwhile, here in California, supposedly the technology center of the world, we still don’t even have any high-speed rail despite a lot of promises and a lot of $$ spent.
Imagine the electrical bill
Remember watching this as a kid on DISCOVERY channel EXTREME ENGINEERING episode
I’m betting the issue with maglevs is the cost to build them. Rich people don’t give a crap about the environment. They only care about profit. If there’s any doubt about whether they can turn a profit, they’ll be averse to -taking the risk-.
It‘s actually german technology, „transrapid“ which got cancelled in germany because of a crash due to maintaining the track without stopping the transrapid!
No, it didnt get cancelled because of the crash with a maintanance vehicle. The crash happened in 2006, development continued until 2011 when it was deemed finished and the license for the test track ran out. The planned projects just failed on a political level
It was canceled on political level because it would have competed with the ICE and the DB. Funding, etc. was reduced way way before the crash.
Super
This would have been considered old technology in America If the military industrial complex didn't exist.
*4cm tall rock lands on the track*
Train goes above it.
500 km/h? That's fast enough for intercontinental travel (10.000 km in 20 hours), but I wander if it could compete with planes.
Easily over even longer distances since you don't have to spend time boarding like you do with a plane.
For example Houston to new York would take roughly 5h on a maglev service, with stops. Flights are scheduled to do it in 3h35m but then you have to add the time waiting at the airport to check in and to retrieve your luggage at the other end.
The other bonus is you could have intermediate stops
@@xaiano794 Wot? You still have to have people board the train, and if you're going cross country, you'll have to load cargo, too. If we're assuming straight shots with no stops (bold, with a cross-country train), then the passenger jet will get there in about half the time. If we have to start accounting for stops, the train is going to take even longer, because your Houston to NYC train line is probably going to Kansas City first, and it's probably stopping at a few stops between Kansas City and Houston as well, and from Kansas City it's probably going to DC, and hitting a few stops between there, too, and then it will probably be stopping at Philadelphia before it hits NYC.
@brofist1959 I already accounted for stops and boarding a train takes roughly 2 minutes although most time tables account for 5.
I'm pretty certain you haven't arrived at an airport 5 minutes before your flight and left on time.
I strongly recommend you try traveling on Japanese trains before you make your judgements as you'd understand how much faster high speed trains are
@@xaiano794 In my experience, it's prudent to add 2 airport hours to flight time when comparing to rail. That being said, 500km/h makes sense for very long distance travel, above 300 miles, and by that point air travel has time to make up the lost airport time.
A slower, cheaper alternative would make much more sense to me. With an average speed of 300 km/h, and maybe peaks of 400, you could travel 4500 km in 15 hours. With seating comfortable enough to sleep well, I can see myself opting for that instead of a 5.5 hour flight plus 2 hours airport time.
In other words, I think that a lot of fast trains will do more good than a few record breaking ones.
@SalveMonesvol you're 100% right that international and very long distances will always be better by air but medium distances (up to 3000km) would be better by maglev, and even high speed rail as things like weight of baggage wouldn't be an issue, plus with rail you can have terminus stations either in or beneath cities rather than far out in the suburbs. Initial construction costs of such projects are always going to be massive, but they are one off costs and can carry huge numbers of passengers
Japan is the leading country in technology and robotics, I love this train its absolutely amazing! 🇯🇵
Yeah the only one working is in China
Yeah like 2 decades ago
@@maxjing61 No you’re completely wrong.
The U.S World and News Report rated Japan as number 1 in technological expertise. DataPandas rated Japan as the most technologically advanced country in the world. GeeksforGeeks rated Japan as the leading country in technology and robotics. I’ve been to Japan, and the Japanese technology was absolutely amazing!
So there you go, Japan is the leading country in technology and robotics. 🇯🇵
Cherry picking biased commercial rankings to support your ill defined bias of what most technologically advanced even means. Name one world leader from Japan in true future leading technologies like AI, electric vehicles, big data, renewal energy, and even specifically robotics, that you so admantly stressed, can you name but one?
@@maxjing61
Are you Chinese, Korean , or somehow a south East Asian?
見え見えだけど！😂
The railcar looks like a Wellie without the upper part. 😂
Could have been reality in Germany in the 80s. The Transrapid Hit 450 km/h in the Kate 80s but was abolished and sold to china (it’s the train in Shanghai you see in this video) due to political mistakes and lack of knowledge of the decision makers
Chinese one is just to show off
It works, doesn't it?!! 😏
Lol 😂
@@ytsux9259 yes bro, but can u imagine the consequences if something goes wrong. Speed thrills, but kills.
@@kelvinmoses7777777It’s still certainly safer than driving, and you go much slower driving.
As much as I maglev technology to advance I also wonder the practicality of a nation so prone to earthquakes being the one to shoulder the development costs
This tech had been around a long time. Since they have an aging populace, having public transport becomes more important for accessibility for young people as well as to support young people starting out.
They also prioritize productivity and the smooth ride allows work on the train, as well as enhanced speed.
For them the value is irreplaceable.
POC train that show this technology works. Hopefully there will be more.
Bravo friends 😊
These have a very smooth ride. Would be so nice to use.
Turn is difficult
Haha the track itself turns not the train.
SABKA SATH SAB KA VIKAS
TO YAHA HUA DIKHRA HAIN 🎉
I told my dad 12 years ago that magets will be used to make cars fly.
We need these instead of planes.
"...in any weather conditions"
I didn't think ice would be nice to build up under the train. High wind from the side could also be terribly complicated. Hail would suck. A hurricane or tornado might be a bit of a problem, though you might be able to outrun one. 🌀 🌪️ 🚆
Or deep snow ❄️ lol 😂
I'll like to see this in a. Blizzard. That U-shaped track would keep all the 2 feet of snow in it.
And asteroid impact.😂
And the uninformed stupidity goes on
What would happen if an earthquake begins.
Looks like a giant worm eating the rail while excreting it
That's amazing engineering let's see America do something like that
I just traveled from Memphis to Dallas in under an hour last Thursday. It was aboard this futuristic aluminum tube way up in the sky. Can’t remember what it’s called though. Maybe it was a train.
@@trefontaineAn american boeing? Would rather ride an airbus. Better build quality and workmanship
@@trefontaineAn hour including check-in, security, baggage retrieval and all that?
@@trefontaine You are being biased. With Uber + check-in + security + boarding + check out + Uber. It's around 5h
Much slower than maglev train
@@AndreVictorGoncalveswho tf taking uber way up there
what if any extremely durable object, just over 10cm gets under the train....
Try it.
If it is above 10cm it cannot come under rather it comes infront of the train and the train pushes that object flying away.
@@vinaykanth4672thank you for using your brain. People like @ApolloInvivo seem to be lacking it nowadays
@@BM-13_KATYUSHATry it on a normal train going a tenth of the speed, heck try whole damn loaded trucks, and get back to us when they stop ripping apart like tissue paper on contact
They look like cool sneakers.
Why do I have a bad feeling about this 😮😢
From Osaka: Im alone at home
From Tokyo: Just grabbing my pixels im coming in 5
0.03
We've been hearing this for years. Every year or so, another country, another city is building a maglev system.
Really? Which ones did you hear of in the last ten years or so? I've only heard of this very project in Japan.
@@lonestarr1490 I don't specifically remember which cities. But China has talked about it multiple times, Japan a few times, even the U.S. keeps throwing it around.
The German developed the technology however due to an accident it has been discontinued in Germany
The catch with maglev trains and their rails is that they're quite expensive to construct :/
verdadero mucho gracias
How does that thing continue to operate after heavy snow or an ice storm? The answer is very likely: IT DOESN'T!
Shanghai doesn't get snow. That's why.
10cm?
My fear is someone putting a little rock anywhere on the track 😬
Why? At that speed and size, it would obliterate the rock. And no one would feel it. Unless it’s a boulder. But that’s straight sabotage at that point.
Even if there is a boulder,they'd have sensors to detect big objects on the track I guess to know beforehand.
@@vinaykanth4672
It is called ‚track- guarding‘.
That is normal, even by ‚classic railroads‘.
15miles in 8 mins is nuts! That’s 2 hours on my bike!
I think I saw that technology on the telly in 1983. I’m glad to see that it’s just as close to being real as it was then.
Maybe if we weren’t spending $270 million a day in Ukraine we could have this shit
Most of that money is not actual money, but just the estimated cost of the equipment being sent. Most of which is old and costs money to store. A lot of it would eventually cost a lot of money to safely decommission
lmao. california high speed rail project started 16 years ago, i'm sure the ukraine war happened 16 years ago as well. america just can't build mega infrastructure like asian countries
Americans oppose even regular high speed rail, and the 'money' isn't going to Ukraine
Throw us backwards Americans a bone why don't ya. Mabey give your data in miles and mph? In addition to metric.
~311 mi/hr.
Source: Googled the speed conversion.
I remember when they talked about maglev when I was a kid. I'm nearly 50 now.
Operate in “any” weather condition ? I uth a mere 10 cm clearance how will it handle Strong Gusts of cross wind that might try to till , or snow drifts that is more than 10 cm high.
U still wearing your mask in your car buddy ?
Yeah
Many birds and animals will die. while you enjoy inside the train.
Many birds and animals die on the highways while you enjoy driving
Many more birds and animals die every hour just by old age, predator, or disease.
Public transportatiojn is always better for the ecosystem than car dependent infrastructure.
Woomp woomp
@@herobrine1847
I think the same, since i was a teenager.
In ‚urban areas‘ and from city to city it is the best way to travel by train … even for commuting 👍🏼✨
What’s the energy cost to get that puppy up to speed?
"with fewer moving pæüørts"
Best channel ever
Thx ❤ for sharing😊
Shoe/Boot of a giant
Meanwhile, a rock on the track.
Train got from Tokyo to Osaka in five minutes but none of passengers survived
Sourpuss jealous statement about the Shanghai Maglev 😄
This is better and simpler than vacuum-trains.
310 mph not too shabby