However, if Moscow regains control over Ukraine, with its 52 million people and major resources as well as its access to the Black Sea, Russia automatically again regains the wherewithal to become a powerful imperial state, spanning Europe and Asia. ― Zbigniew Brzeziński, The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives
Yes, problem is Russia always had imperialism and expansion in mind. Some decisions are not easy to make really but Surely Russia expansion to Ukraine have nothing to do with helping people in Donbass. It's a power grab.
@@martindembek9833Lmao nice propaganda. Russia actually cares about it's people unlike the US. They invaded ukriane because they been shelling the donbas for 8 years. The only imperialists are the US
"Much … depends on the performance of the current Russian political elite-an elite that is strikingly different in composition and outlook from its post-communist counterparts in Central Europe. Russia’s current leadership includes no former political dissidents, not even one. … The current Russian political elite is largely an alliance of criminalized oligarchs and the KGB and military leadership. Their renunciation of the Soviet past has been perfunctory." - Zbigniew Brzezinski (The National Interest, Fall 2000)
At 2:27: For the first time since WWII 'force' was used within Europe (referring to when Russia 'invaded' Crimea, in 2014 after the illegal EU/US instigated coup). ~ Brzezinski Brzezinski did not remember too well in the end, did he? He seems to have forgotten America's/NATO's major illegal bombing of Serbia in 1999 under Clinton, when the Chinese embassy was hit and Chinese citizens were killed along with Serbs. And what about the terrorists and the upheaval they caused in Chechnya, a republic inside Russia, in the 1990s? And also other incidents INSIDE other NATO countries?
Do we have the moral right to condemn Russians? Who bombed Yugoslavia, Syria, Libya, Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan... Why didn't you get outraged then??? Who turns a blind eye to the fascist units of ukriana "Azov", "Aidar"? Who hid from the world community the genocide in Donbass, where more than 14,000 people died in 8 years? Why were 150,000 Ukrainian soldiers concentrated on the border with Donbass? Why did we applaud the drug addict Zelensky, who declared that he intended to create an atomic bomb? Why are all Russian media blocked? Why do the media cover only one side of the conflict? The Western media are skillful factories of lies! Even presidents believe them… The world has long been a hostage of diabolical democracy!!! It has already been proven that Ukrainians themselves staged sinister provocations in Buchi, Crematorsk, thereby extorting lethal weapons… There is not a single proof that the Russians are killing civilians! The Russians are the only nation in the world that has fought evil all its history! Back in 2007, Putin warned NATO that if it approached Russia's borders, he would respond. Then they laughed at him.. We woke up the Russian bear in vain… He will turn the whole world upside down and become the winner! This is understood by the Chinese, Indians and Arabs. The world is going through an unprecedented economic crisis. It's only going to get worse every day... I'm against the war!!!! I am against fascists!!!!!! PS Pray for the Russians, they are saving the world from the fascists!!! If Putin wanted to, he would have captured Ukraine in 10 days. All he had to do was bomb the cities of Ukraine, like the United States in Syria, the city of Raqqa... The voice of real America - Lara Logan. She wasn't afraid to tell the TRUTH! Bravo!!! th-cam.com/video/rXkFpu7pH2g/w-d-xo.html&ab_channel=SignsOfTheEndTimes%3F The opinion of an American military analyst. The UN Weapons Inspector in Iraq. th-cam.com/video/seDi09dFurk/w-d-xo.html
Brzezinski is more measured in his analysis and not given to the hysteria of his compatriots. But the narrative by the interviewer is not correct. Russia did not invade Crimea, it already had a major military base and has never left Crimea for over 150 years. "Crimea was part of Russia from 1783, when the Tsarist Empire annexed it a decade after defeating Ottoman forces in the Battle of Kozludzha, until 1954, when the Soviet government transferred Crimea from the Russian Soviet Federation of Socialist Republics (RSFSR) to the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic (UkrSSR)." - The Wilson Center. Crimea which was handed over to Ukraine from Russia by the USSR as part of an alliance of economic and social integration between Russia and Ukraine. Ukraine's desire to become a part of NATO troubled the Russians and as a result - the people of Crimea decided to break away from Ukraine. It was a divorce and each side took back what they brought into the marriage. One question that I have that is never discussed is how is the referendum in Crimea any different from Scotland's when it voted with regards to separating from the United Kingdom? President Trump is at peace with Crimea being reintegrated with Russia. Brzezinski said that Western Europe should not have integrated 10 [Eastern European] countries into NATO. Ukraine was their next target and it imploded against their expectations. Russia's strategy towards Ukraine is clear, use the vast Russian speaking population in Eastern Ukraine to keep a perpetual state of tension so that NATO will not absorb Ukraine. The problem that I have with most of these geopolitical analysts is that they seem to start with the end-game - the geopolitical outcome they desire and then their analysis is fashioned to fulfill their goal. It is refreshing to see that Zbigniew Brzezinski is not part of that camp. Is Putin the CEO of Russia, quite likely, though not as wealthy as many of our western capitalists, but apparently the Russian people do not care. He has recovered their land (Crimea) which was handed over to Ukraine through their failed Communist experiment. Our biggest challenge in the United States is not Russia or even China - they are focused on the economic development of their nations, it is our Educational System and in particular STEM education. The Bible says that in a multitude of counselors there is safety and so people like Brzezinski with vast experience should enter into the discussions more often. A foreign policy that is focused on short-term gain is in no one's interest. It is not too late to re-engage with Russia, the longer we wait and the more aggressive we are towards them, the more likely it is that they will align more deeply militarily with China. Even if Russia is not a close partner, three separate global military powers are better than two against one and unfortunately, we are fast moving towards that path.
- Op-ed written as Crimea was shaken by clashes in the prelude to the peninsula’s annexation by Russia: The U.S. could and should convey clearly to Mr. Putin that it is prepared to use its influence to make certain a truly independent and territorially undivided Ukraine will pursue policies toward Russia similar to those so effectively practiced by Finland: mutually respectful neighbors with wide-ranging economic relations with Russia and the EU; no participation in any military alliance viewed by Moscow as directed at itself but expanding its European connectivity. In brief, the Finnish model is ideal for Ukraine, the EU, and Russia in any larger east-west strategic accommodation. But to be credible to the Kremlin, the U.S. needs also to spell out privately that attempts to destabilize the emerging democracy in Kiev or detach parts of Ukraine-not to mention even overt or covert Russian participation in its neighbor’s domestic conflicts-would compel Washington to use its influence internationally to prompt steps that would be economically costly to Moscow. - Zbigniew Brzezinski (Financial Times, 02.23.14)
@@tadasblindavicius8889 That was what Putin wanted too: a neutral model for Ukraine! But while he told Ukraine that they could be part of both the EAU and the EU, the EU told Ukraine it couldn't be part of both, and when the elected President asked for some more time, the USA backed the coup d'etat that dispose of him! In 2022, Kissinger said that Ukraine could abandon Crimea if it wanted peace, but the new generation attacked him. Bzrezinski and Kissinger were the architects who helped the USA win the Cold War, but their inheritors think of them as having fulfilled their role, they don't consider them relevant anymore.
The US cannot engage with Russia. Their whole international relations are built to keep Russia forever separate from the rest of Europe. That's why even though Russia is only about 20% worse than Ukraine in things like corruption etc etc, you will NEVER in your life time hear any proposal of Russia's integration with Europe after Putin is gone. Even if Russia turns very pro-European, they cannot be allowed to unite with Europe. If no one else, the fucking Polacks will make sure of it. One of the reasons why as a Slovenian I want out of the EU until Poland is thrown out.
Well you mention US foreign policies and you are correct ,have look "Wolfowitz Doctrine " which was declasified document after 30 years ...that document clearly explain the US role in geo politics after collaps of USSR ,first thing they did after collaps of USSR and East Block Warsaw Pact convinced senate to up millitary spending ? and gradualy increased NATO by all fromer " east block " countries ,creeping closer to Russian borders .That is not a sign of good will or copperation that is flexing the millitary power in Europe
Interestingly, he mentioned 10 countries, whom he deemed as neither ready for Europe nor having the qualifications to be in Europe, and didn't say their names to avoid making public enemies. In the Russian news very recently, they said that 10 countries opened accounts at Gazprombank so that they could buy gas in roubles. Are these the same 10 countries?
Funny, I was thinking .. well that didn't age well. I thought Europe had worked through challenges already. What Vladolf has done is show nations are too small, strength in unity matters.
There is only IMPERATIVE: IT IS IMPERATIVE that no Eurasian challenger emerges capable of dominating EurAsia and thus of also challenging America - Zbignew Brzezinski {Nicholas J Spykman} 😎
@@geoeconomics3067 -To isolate Ukraine internationally, Russian policymakers have also skillfully exploited the Clinton administration’s preoccupation with Ukraine's nuclear status. Playing on American fears (and the administration's evident preference for Russian control over Ukraine's nuclear weapons), Moscow was quite successful in portraying the new leaders in Kiev as a menace to international stability. Ukraine's ineptitude in conveying its concerns to the West also intensified its isolation and therefore its sense of vulnerability. - Zbigniew Brzezinski (Foreign Affairs, March/April 1994)
@@tadasblindavicius8889 There is only one IMPERATIVE: IT IS IMPERATIVE that no EurAsian challenger emerges capable of dominating EurAsia and thus of also challenging America - Zbignew Brzezinski (Spykman)
What a fool. He completely misread the situation in Crimea. Took zero consideration re: Crimeans wanting no part in taking orders from Kiev/allegiance to Russia-yes THE PEOPLE of Crimea by a massive majority wanted to be part of Russia. He also fails to understand the maritime access benefit of Crimea to Russia and what that means economically/militarily. It’s almost as if ZBig is expressing his hopes rather than make a cold analysis of the situation. His comments have aged terribly.
But Russians in Ukraine cannot have the same rights as Albanians in Kosovo or the Scots in UK etc. Those are RUSSIANS!! LOL Yeah, as a Slovenian I have full support for any part of Ukraine that wants to democratically split from Kyiv.
*Divide and rule.* Maybe "rule" is the incorrect word in regards to the USA, and *divide and "gain an advantage"* if others struggle, fight, and then lose, is closer to what happened. The word "rule" also constitutes a "trigger", or natural aversion, which would mean psychologically oposing a theory, simply based on the words used. At the turn of the previous century ("around 1900") Washington DC set out to "divide (Europe)" and "gain" (from collective European madness). Note how such a policy doesn't necessarily have to be co-ordinated politically. So no "your a conspiwacy theowist"-allegations please, lol. In regards to Europeans, the policy basically carried itself, and today *still* carries itself, because Europeans are already sufficiently divided on multiple levels. Any actions by a strong enough 3rd party wishing to gain simply needs to avoid any form of unity in Europe, or to "nip in the bud" any signs of formal/informal agreement between Europeans (the Cold War was of course an exception, when Western European unity was useful to stand up to Eastern European Communism/SU/Warsaw Pact). One of the key strategies in "divide and rule" is to fund and support both sides in a world full of rivals for dominance, influence and markets. *Once "divided", and kept divided, there is no "single voice" to stand up to a stronger entity.* From wiki, and regarding the theory: "Divide and rule policy (Latin: divide et impera), or divide and conquer, in politics and sociology is gaining and maintaining power by breaking up larger concentrations of power into pieces that individually have less power than the one implementing the strategy." Elements of this technique involve: - creating or encouraging divisions ... - to prevent alliances that could challenge ... - distributing forces that they overpower the other - aiding and promoting those who are willing to cooperate - fostering distrust and enmity Historically, this strategy was used in many different ways by empires seeking to expand their territories." [editted for clarity re. the states/empires level of things] *"Divide and gain" would work exactly the same way.* There is an entire palate of examples of "dividing Europe" on multiple levels, and gain an advantage (see below comments thread for a few). These multiple examples are not "anecdotal", or "cherry picked", but form a pattern in a political game (in geopolitics/grand strategy = avoid the unity of "others", because unity = strength). Regarding this policy, it needs a keen sense of observation by a nation's gatekeepers, so as not to inadvertently become a part of it. *"Defeat Them in Detail: The Divide and Conquer Strategy. Look at the parts and determine how to control the individual parts, create dissension and leverage it." - Robert Greene* And "observe the details" and "leverage" is what the American Internationalism fans (US corporatism) in Washington DC did, opposed by the ever-waning forces of US Isolationism, re-inspired by Donald Trump ("Trump Doctrine") and others... All of these terms can be googled for more context. Note that in order to play this game, the "divider" must have some form of advantage. In regards to Washington DC, this advantage which it could use to attract suitors was their own rapidly increasing power. Ever important markets acting like a lighthouse for capitalist ventures. But with a geographical advantage which made it virtually impossible to invade by the late-19th Century (grand strategy), the USA already had little to fear militarily. What was "in it" for Washington DC in her favoratism of mostly Paris and London? *London was Europe's only power that could effectively unite Europe, by acting as a unifying power as a matter of policy, rather than as an aloof divider herself.* Regarding any form of united Europe, by whomever or for whatever reasons, the "gatekeepers of Empire" sat in London. A "united Europe" either with or without GB/Empire could only go through London and with London's approval. Ask Napoleon I. He knows what it resulted in when "gatekeepers" stepped forward to avoid any form of single continental unity or hegemony. These "gatekeepers" followed policies which made any form of unity impossible (per treaty, political, or as a result of wars between continental powers). At the first signs of unity/friendship on the continent, London would step in and divide using a variety of age-old, trusted and well-honed political skills up to the point of declaring preventive wars. *A divided continent also suited London just fine: the newly united Germany, was wedged in between her two main historical rivals for territory and gain: France and Russia (geopolitics/grand strategy).* The above is also known as the "avoid a single hegemony on the continent"-narrative, and is not disputed by most historians. A disunited Europe at this point, also suited Washington DC just fine. *It should not have "suited" London, because the world was changing.* The USA's first really big attempt at expanding beyond the limits of the own Monroe Doctrine, and the "promises made" not to meddle in European affairs was Spain. With the Monroe Doctrine Washington DC stated: "Don't worry Europe, we are satiated..." A declaration which would not last long. LOL, no. They were *not* satiated. After a period of strategic consolidation, leaders here were looking for easy targets whose spheres of influence could be expanded into with the formula "little ventured/a lot gained", and excuses which could be made for expanding which could be sold as "acts of benevolence". The rapidly sinking Spanish Empire offered the territories as a "gateway to China" in the form of already annexed Hawaii, the Philippenes and Guam and protection for the seaways in between. The 1898 Spanish American War was then simply the torero sticking a sword into the neck of the dying bull...a fitting allegory. Obviously "triggered" by the Japanese annexation of Formosa in 1895. To achieve all of this Washington DC needed European indifference for the cause of "weak failing empires" (Darwinism/Spain), and divided Europe happily complied... *How to succeed here if Europe decided to unite and stand up to US expansion, by offering political support to Spain?* Answer: favoratism. "Favor" one "empire" (in this case France and GB) above others...temporarily. It would be a mistake to think that these "divide and rule/conquer"-strategies and tactics started with the Roman Empire, and ended when the British left India in 1947 (Two examples usually referred to when historians examine this as a political practice). It is alive and well. *It surrounds every aspect of power politics and has been ever-present on all levels of society and politics ever since the dawn of mankind.* Today the US military doctrine of "Flexible Response" is nothing else but "divide and rule" in the disguise of "divide and gain": Divide Europeans, to enable the continued US domination of world affairs. It is the same strategy London/British Empire used as it tried to hang on to Empire. A flexible response = "hopping" onto a crisis or war without having to have done much to avoid it. Some of the rare historical anomalies are Chamberlain (Munich 1938) or Boris Jonson (Finland/Sweden 2022) because try as one might, one cannot find any other strategic incentive for these missions, other than the noble cause and an effort keep the peace, in the face of previous total failure. Notice that one of the key strategies in "dividing" others is to take opposing positions in political issues, without these positions being based on moral standards or principles. Simply strengthen the position of one side in an issue at one time, then make a 180 degree about turn and support the other side another time. An example here is for the two Moroccan crises (1905 vs. 1911). In 1905, Washington DC actually tacidly supported the German position and insisted on Morrocan independence, protecting it from being carved up by France/Spain. In 1911, the USA chose the side of the colonial powers against Berlin's position, and signed Moroccan independence away to "the wolves" of colonialism. Divide and gain: Historically the funding of opposing European ideologies, leaders and states. For example, US private funding of European dictators in the 1920s and 1930s, *and* at the same time supporting Stalin's Five-Year Plans, was a strategy which carried through to today. *A geographical advantage meant that whatever happened in Europe would be a "win" for Washington DC power mongers.* Or, one could state that if one is far enough away, one can "sit on the fence and await the outcome" when the shtf somewhere else. Strategists can always count on a plethora of enablers who carry out such division, mostly for entirely independent causes: from "humanism" to "big business", one can become a tool of strategists. Politicians, business elites, journalists, historians, teachers...they can all contribute, without even being aware of the fact.
Everything very accurate, apart from one point: Boris Jonhson's pact with Finland/Sweden isn't an anomaly because it did nothing to keep the peace, as there was no threat whatsoever to them from Putin in 2022 - on the contrary, it facilitated them abandon their long-held neutrality and safety, in order to apply for NATO membership. (NATO membership means participation in wars on behalf of the USA interests)
Yes , you are right. Politics and politicians seem ignoring moral principles . In case of the two Moroccan crisis1905 and 1911 are well illustrated this fact
Zbigniew Kazimierz Brzezinski is a Polish American political scientist, geostrategist, and statesman who served as a counsellor to Lyndon B. Johnson from 1966–1968 and held the position of United States National Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter from 1977 to 1981. Zbigniew Brzezinski was born in Warsaw, Poland, in 1928. His family, members of the nobility (or "szlachta" in Polish), bore the Trąby coat of arms and hailed from Berzeżany in Galicia in the Tarnopol Voivodeship (administrative region) of then eastern Poland (now in Ukraine). The town of Brzeżany is thought to be the source of the family name. He was born on March 28, 1928. This photograph originates from the International Magazine Services photo archive. IMS was a editorial photo archive in Scandinavia founded in 1948 but evolved from older archives that have images in the collection also. The archive is in great condition and been in storage for a long time and the images in the collection are now being sold off one by one. The images in this archive where distributed in only 10-15 copies around the world at the time and many copies have been lost or damaged during time, each copy from the collection is therefore very rare and unique. This kind of rare images are not only a great thing to own but also a great investment. Own a piece of history with this great photography memorabilia. By purchasing a photo from IMXPIX Images, copyright does not transfer. We are selling these photos as collectibles only and no copyright is implied. Detected: OCR
just well spoken guy.... and retelling what was written in the script full of lies. so well spoken ... will drive you away from reality and and put you in the clouds where he also had been and he was in this video. nothing much to expect from the guy born in sovet time and driven by hate and revenge (rebel without cause). selling story about people based on information from .... no name stated or agency. just repeat the lie and will become true. sad old man
Keep in mind that China went all totalitarian only in recent years, this interview was made in 2017. Deng Xiaoping's liberal reforms allowed China to have perhaps the most impressive economic growth in history. They went from a 3rd world country to a technological hub and a rival to the US, you just can't deny that. They made some mistakes like the one child policy but generally China developed rapidly over the last 40 years.
@@MyPrideFlag In your logic, Hitler is also an exceptional leader. Nazi Germany made huge economic growth too during his time. From a different angel, China has made significant progresses(in the past 30+ years) in undermining the system the West has built. As a "strategist" of the US, Brzezinski not only failed in advising to defend our value/system, but helped them succeed. By praising the dictators to be "exceptional" is mindblowing. He is the architect of all the chaos today!
@@slwang12 First of all Brzeziński was an advisor in 1977-81. In that time China wasn't a threat to the US, USSR was. And Brzeziński's actions helped to bring down USSR and gave your country decades of hegemony in the world. It has been 40 years since that time. If you want to blame someone for losing it, blame Bush or Obama's administration. But for me it was a natural order of things that no country can enjoy such a domination for too long. A quick reminder, unlike Hitler (or the US), China didn't invade anyone. No Chinese leader after Deng Xiaoping is responsible for millon of deaths. And Hitler ultimately destroyed Germany. As much as I condemn their totalitarian turn, Uighur camps, etc, comparing them (even Xi Jin Ping) to Hitler is simply wrong. As I said they gave Chinese people unprecedented prosperity and made China a superpower. You just look from your point of view that China bad, they're a threat to the US, etc. And don't make laugh with "protecting american values". I assume you're a republican (sorry if i'm wrong). Was Brzezinski's a priest? No, he was concerned with national defence and international politics. He was an expert on Soviet Union. And Soviet Union fell.
@@MyPrideFlag No, the victory over USSR has nothing to do with Brzezinski. It's the victory of freedom, the value of the west. The foundation he laid out 40 years ago is creating what we are having today in Russia and in China. My comments above is related to what he said in 2017 by praising dictators! Essentially, that's his mindset when he was architecting 40 years ago
@@nebojsakecman862 He looks just like Davros from Doctor Who! Am I the only person on the internet who thinks that Brzezinski looks like and talks exactly like "Davros", the creator of the Polish-Canadian Daleks from the British Doctor Who TV shows?
He looks like Davros from Doctor Who! Am I the only person on the internet who thinks that Brzezinski looks like and talks exactly like "Davros", the creator of the Polish-Canadian Daleks from the British Doctor Who TV shows?
Russia will never be with "some one". Ukraine Belarus etc... Russia will be on its own like any other nation. Why for Russia is so important to be with "some one"? USSR gone long ago. Forget "some one". Russia should built its own future.
2:35 that's plain wrong, 1999 US and its western europe servant states attacked Jugoslavija killing thousands of civilians and totally destroying the infrastructure, under the invented excuse to save albanians from serbian oppression (which was as valid as germany's excuse to invade poland 1939). Being an american makes you completely ignorant of your own crimes...
what are the kind of serious reforms , which Brzezinski told about Ukraine? I thing not only Ukraine which should attempt serious reforms, but every country in the world should do that way
Crimea "....first time since WWII that force was used in Europe"... Really? Ask Belgrade people and Bill Clinton (ah, BIllC advised by ZB, of course.!).
He’s an analyst who worked for presidents. He even suggests a neutral Crimea so both countries don’t lay a claim on it, avoided suggesting war even with this unreal solution.
This guy is delusional on purpose, a capitalist with colonial mentality. NATO is a threat not only to Russia, it participating in bombing Yugoslavia and destruction of the Middle East.
I really don't know. I'm asking ... 4:37 min ... would, Crimea, be a stupid place to put the capital of the EU? ... if Ukraine became a member of the EU, and, EU agreed, and, Ukraine and Russia agreed, to Crimea becoming the EU Capital Territory (ECT) or EU Capital District (ECD) or EU Capital (EUC)... or EU Capital Region (EUCR) or e.t.c. ... ? ... with a new purpose built city, Europa or e.t.c. ... ? within that area, becoming the city that is the captial of the EU ... ? ... So that, for example, the capital of the EU would be Europa, in the EU Capital Territory/District/Region? .... (and, the EU Capital, would in addition, have it's own governance - not, Ukrainian or Russian or French or German or Belgium or Polish or Greek or e.t.c. .... ?, but the governance locally of Europa in the EU Capital Region: so that there would be two governments/parliaments: a local government for the actual running of the city/territory, made up of those who permanently live there, and, the government/parliament with all the seats, all the representatives, for all the members of the EU who travel from their own state/country to make decisions/debate/vote? ...)
Sorry for putting it like this ... but ... What is more important: to make Putin pay and cripple Russia and therefore potentially providing an opening for Putin and Russia to, in effect, become ruled by China and be China - extending China into Euroasia and Europe, up to Ukraine's borders and increasing China's land based resources (like rare earth minerals, coal, oil, access to the arctic), production e.t.c.? ... Or ... for the EU (which essentially also includes the US, UK, e.t.c.) to stop squabbling and infighting, which is resource intensive, putting the whole world at risk, risking the start of WWIII, and which is literally destroying those purported to be in need of protection and being protected, to instead to form an alliance with Russia? ... wouldn't that open a gateway for diplomacy and trade with Euroasia and or the Middle East (Russia is part of Europe and Eurasia, as Turkey is part of Europe and the Middle East)? ... If Turkey and Georgia were part of the EU and EU had an alliance or special alliance with Russia ... how would the globe look then? .... proportionally, EU/UK/US compared with China/(Russia) or EU/UK/US/Russia compared with China? How many American bonds is China earning interest from, enough to fund their military? How much does America owe financially to China? ... rules are rules, aren't they? .... or .... How much is China funding America? ... is it, EU/UK compared with China/(US)/(Russia) or EU/UK/Russia compared with China/(US)? "Memorandum on security assurances in connection with Ukraine’s accession to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons" Was it not agreed to or signed by, Russian Federation, Ukraine, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, United States of America? The UK and USA, don't have permission to enter Ukraine, to protect the border? ... Not NATO, but the UK and USA? .... and, because it is in writing, it is something that Russia would object to? I really don't know. I'm asking ... ... would, Crimea, be a stupid place to put the capital of the EU? ... if Ukraine became a member of the EU, and, EU agreed, and, Ukraine and Russia agreed, to Crimea becoming the EU Capital Territory (ECT) or EU Capital District (ECD) or EU Capital (EUC)... or EU Capital Region (EUCR) or e.t.c. ... ? ... with a new purpose built city, Europa or e.t.c. ... ? within that area, becoming the city that is the captial of the EU ... ? ... So that, for example, the capital of the EU would be Europa, in the EU Capital Territory/District/Region? .... (and, the EU Capital, would in addition, have it's own governance - not, Ukrainian or Russian or French or German or Belgium or Polish or Greek or e.t.c. .... ?, but the governance locally of Europa in the EU Capital Region: so that there would be two governments/parliaments: a local government for the actual running of the city/territory, made up of those who permanently live there, and, the government/parliament with all the seats, all the representatives, for all the members of the EU who travel from their own state/country to make decisions/debate/vote? ...) Short version: ... where is the current fighting? ... what is it over ... exactly ...? ... it doesn't look like it might cease any time soon. ... Would it be impossible, in that area, to convert the type ... of war ... from war of might to war of words? i.e. Ukraine retain sovereignty, possibly join the EU, a section of Ukraine (with Ukraine's permission) become the de jure capital of the EU, a buffer area that is Ukraine and Russia ... NATO headquarters remain where they are ... ? and, ... which agreement already assures Ukraines borders? This wouldn't support military goals, with less negative impact on civilians than sanctions or lending/giving military equipment*, and or contribute to long term security, safety and lives of military personnel? *military equipment (that might get scavenged/reverse engineered/sent elsewhere/on sold and or seized? ... and an increased risk, that, doesn't seem like it would be impossible to forsee: friendly fire, and, fingers point, as if otherwise?). ... distance of Ukraine ... possible EU de jure capital, international embassies ... Iranian oil ... ? ... if a section of Ukraine (with Ukraine's permission) becomes the de jure capital of the EU ... the US would need an embassy there ... as would the UK and Russia and e.t.c. ... also, ... de jure capital of EU in Ukraine ... seems like there would be more cameras there then .... ... who can assist with knowledge and wisdom, to turn it into a historic moment? ... peaceful? ... Stay well. Peace. Eleonora Formato née Szczepanowski South Australia
Sanctions ... aren't creating, or contributing to, a sort of Iron curtain ... ? Sanctions, historically, stop military spending? Sanctions don't impact civilians? ... "lesson militarily" ... and "effect of sanctions" ... ? ... seems like actions ... specifically going after civilians for strategic military gain ... seems like actions external to ... what's the administrative law position? ... separate and in addition to that though, what makes it ok to deny, an oligarch use of their property, or a General access to their own money while on vacation? ... if it's state owned or state money, then, they wouldn't be denied? ... where is the line, for denial of property ownership and use? ... a General doesn't necessarily have the wealth of an oligarch - more like, upper middle class wealth, comparable with those of the Chinese upper middle class ... no? I don't know. I'm asking. If the financial/banking sector in other countries are run by some clever people who are competent, it seems like a shame, there is an attempt to strangle them with sanctions (sanctions: "three phases" ... "deter", "punish", "bankrupt" ... "coup"). I don't know, would asking them, instead, how they are organising things totally a stupid thing to ask? On a different scale, over a similar region, isn't Ukraine in Europe? Isn't the part of Russia that surrounds the Ukraine, part of Europe? ... So, isn't 'it' all happening, in Europe? Between European countries? Is Russia still a communist country? ... Russia isn't, at the very least, on it's way to being a a democratic country? ... it's not a capitalist type country now? ... Aren't sanctions being applied to businesses in Russia and those living in Russia who are wealthy? It seems like, in away, with the support of other countries, NATO, it is just about all of Europe excluding a part of Europe and with economic sanctions? ... Isn't that a sort of Fascism?
I mean he was Polish who migrated to the US, and talking like he understands Russians more than the literal President of Russia. The Poles have a bad history against the Soviet Union. Its hard to take what he says without a grain of salt.
@@antonioribeiro2978 wrong There is only one IMPERATIVE: IT IS IMPERATIVE that no EurAsian challenger emerges capable of dominating EurAsia and thus of also challenging America - Zbignew Brzezinski (Spykman)
Only a Pole could be so completely wrong. I know, my grandfather was from Poland, his son (my uncle) pissed away his estate without even trying. The Polish are the most self destructive group in Europe and that says a lot. Carter was a fool.
@2:25 Was it as transforming as when force was used, contrary to your opinion, when NATO decided to dismantle Yugoslavia using around 30,000 bombs and missiles? Isn't it a little strange that while your own published perspectives and analyses on international relations and conflicts, including those in the Balkans, were influencing policymakers, academics, and the public on the region and yet here you claim that 2014 represents the first time since WW2 that force was used in Europe. Did Russia use more than 30K bombs to rip Ukraine out of the hands of Ukrainians? Did Crimeans suffer from Putin's bombs and are they still suffering the trauma from this event today as are the people who once constituted Yugoslavia? Is this the position of your son in Poland, as well, and your daughter in the USA, both of whom seem to be continuing your legacy of Russophobia? Is it really sad for your family that fear no longer holds sway over Europe with respect to Russia? Not very inviting of a peaceful Europe and an open continent in my humble opinion.
COULD SOMEBODY EXPLAIN FOR ME ... what is he saying at 5:25 - 5:29 - "quither things are headed" ?!?!? What is he trying to say ? I don t understand him, pls explain
"if Putin starts another wave of cold war unilateral actions..." This is the opposite of what Russia has done under Putin's leadership, but hatred of Russia is the absolute cornerstone of Zbig's world view.
Panie Psorze, chyba w najblizszych latach wynalazek aptekarza polskiego troche na wartosci straci, a jesli nie to sie chyba rynek skurczy. Chcialbym doczekac wypowiedzi Psora-Bricks i przemysl swiatowy, ale to juz chyba w Niemczech. PZDR.Grzesiek
So, is this why the US needed for Russia to go into Ukraine? Europe was slipping away and they figured that if Putin will go East, then Europe will get scared again, get united, and come back to the US?
@@micah4242 Remember, when you see adjectives next to the noun, like "unprovoked bombing," that's a sign of brainwashing. They add "unprovoked" strategically and repeat on all news and then repeaters like you repeat their filthy lies.
@@masternmargarita What was the provocation in your opinion? And don’t insult me by saying “denazification.” There is actually nothing that could justify such indiscriminate killing of civilians. I know it’s not “fake news” because I look on sites like Airwars and Forensic Architecture that analyze metadata to collect time, date and location of video. They will identify fakes on both sides.
Foundations of Geopolitics The book emphasizes that Russia must spread Anti-Americanism everywhere: "the main 'scapegoat' will be precisely the U.S." In the United States: "Russia should use its special services within the borders of the United States to fuel instability and separatism, for instance, provoke "Afro-American racists". Russia should "introduce geopolitical disorder into internal American activity, encouraging all kinds of separatism and ethnic, social and racial conflicts, actively supporting all dissident movements - extremist, racist, and sectarian groups, thus destabilizing internal political processes in the U.S. It would also make sense simultaneously to support isolationist tendencies in American politics." --Alexander Dugin, Russian Military Subversion specialist (Adviser for Kremlin)
@@newkodiaq "I would describe it as the heart and soul of Soviet intelligence - was a subversion. Not intelligence collection, but subversion: active measures to weaken the West, to drive wedges in the Western community alliances of all sorts, particularly NATO, to sow discord among allies, to weaken the United States in the eyes of the people of Europe, Asia, Africa, Latin America, and thus to prepare the ground in case the war really occurs. To make America more vulnerable to the anger and distrust of other peoples." Oleg Kalugin, Ex-KGB Major General (retired)
Panie Zbyszku (przepraszam za smialosc) sytuacja byla inna ale ta sama robote dla wolnosci co zrobil Kopernik zrobif tez Frycek Chopin w XIX wieku nuty po amerykansku nazywajac. Wiem ze pojecie "swiat "jest zbyt obszerne zeby spokoj byl. Moj kanal na youtube Panie Psorze-"armonica diatonica player ". Zem se w Milano jest. Grzesiek
It's Davros from Doctor Who! Am I the only person on the internet who thinks that Brzezinski looks like and talks exactly like "Davros", the creator of the Polish-Canadian Daleks from the British Doctor Who TV shows?
Clarine Berry it wasnt their territory They werent invited The referendum took place after the russian troops arrived How can you say that the russians didnt invade? You just dont like the term
'Frustrated by the wasted effort, and with demands for action from their citizens, the allied commanders decided to attack Russia's main naval base in the Black Sea: Sevastopol on the Crimean peninsula. After extended preparations, allied forces landed on the peninsula in September 1854 and marched their way to a point south of Sevastopol after winning the Battle of the Alma (20 September 1854). The Russians counterattacked on 25 October in what became the Battle of Balaclava and were repulsed, however the British Army forces were seriously depleted as a result.' (Wiki) i wonder why he did not start his tellings with the crimean war of 1853-55. We all use the Internet. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crimean_War
Correct USA planned financed organized take over of Ukraina to separate Ukraina from Russia why ? RUSSIA with Ukraina is global power RUSSIA without Ukraina is regional power - Zbinew Brzezinski
The only way to predict the future is to have the power to shape the future. His predictions were only possible because he was the one shaping the future. I dont miss him at all.
Dual status entity for Ukraine, will be better than an alliance of Ukraine with NATO. Unfortunately the political leaders in Ukraine are not well qualified to understand this aspect of the reality3. The war startedin 24 February 2022 has given right to zbegniew brezensky opinion stated here in 2017...the political leaders seems don't understand the lessons of history
I don’t think your analysis accepted by anyone given your biased view on Russia 🇷🇺 our world is changing China Russia and India and Brazil are the new players.
To be an enemy of America can be dangerous, but to be a friend is fatal.
Henry Kissinger
bullshit
Not necessarily. Yes, Ukraine will be in rubble, but trans people will be able to assert themselves in that rubble.
Food as a weapon.
Is not the first time Kissinger was talking crap. Not sure how this guy got the Nobel Price, but the Nobel comity is corrupt anyway.
Cool.
Now post the full quote, bucko.
Brzezinski didn't start the fire
It was always burning
Since the world's been turning.
@05:35
... sounds like,. moscow 'deviated' that Turning pnt.
He just poured gasoline on it
Force was used in Jugoslavia also.
When they use force they don't see it as force! They are always good!
He definitely doesn't care about people who are affected by his decisions
If you take a course about why the world is screwed up, this guy is in the syllabus
indeed
He is GONE ...
@@arnsteinholm7372 Straight hell.
Right out of Bob Dylan's "Masters of War."
Trliateral commision :)
However, if Moscow regains control over Ukraine, with its 52 million people and major resources as well as its access to the Black Sea, Russia automatically again regains the wherewithal to become a powerful imperial state, spanning Europe and Asia.
― Zbigniew Brzeziński, The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives
Yes, problem is Russia always had imperialism and expansion in mind. Some decisions are not easy to make really but Surely Russia expansion to Ukraine have nothing to do with helping people in Donbass. It's a power grab.
@@martindembek9833 this is pure brainwashed hogwash
@@martindembek9833Lmao nice propaganda. Russia actually cares about it's people unlike the US. They invaded ukriane because they been shelling the donbas for 8 years. The only imperialists are the US
@@martindembek9833 lol , Azov Neo nAzi bombing Donbass ,Victoria nuland coup in 2014
@@martindembek9833 lol , Azof Neo Nazi bombing Donbass ,V.nuland coup in 2014
This mans got no heart. He is very brilliant, smart and intelligents but his motives of desire is way far from as being a real human.
Nofoaiga Leu how so?
Sounds like you just dont like the way he lays things out
@@kloschuessel773 just slide down your Klo Schuessel
@@wolfgangfischer8034 your niveau certainly did, boy
"Much … depends on the performance of the current Russian political elite-an elite that is strikingly different in composition and outlook from its post-communist counterparts in Central Europe. Russia’s current leadership includes no former political dissidents, not even one. … The current Russian political elite is largely an alliance of criminalized oligarchs and the KGB and military leadership. Their renunciation of the Soviet past has been perfunctory." - Zbigniew Brzezinski (The National Interest, Fall 2000)
I can see the Russian trolls really hate this guy. Is it because he helped to end USSR?
🤦 fall of Soviet union is because america prints money out of thin air due to petro dollar while Soviet union couldn't
russian trolls???? every normal person knows what kind of evil this scumbag represents
COMMUNIST party of Soviet Union destroyed communist party of Soviet Union, than Communist party of Soviet Union destroyed Soviet Union
GOT IT ???
@@nz2191
They made a trap for Russia in Ukraina 2022
read Z Brzezinski
@@nz2191
USA planned war in Ukraina in 1992 read Zbignew Brzezinski
mindless automaton
Grand CHessboard changed my life on geo-politics.
At 2:27: For the first time since WWII 'force' was used within Europe (referring to when Russia 'invaded' Crimea, in 2014 after the illegal EU/US instigated coup). ~ Brzezinski
Brzezinski did not remember too well in the end, did he? He seems to have forgotten America's/NATO's major illegal bombing of Serbia in 1999 under Clinton, when the Chinese embassy was hit and Chinese citizens were killed along with Serbs. And what about the terrorists and the upheaval they caused in Chechnya, a republic inside Russia, in the 1990s? And also other incidents INSIDE other NATO countries?
You dont like to remind yourself on evil things you have done.
Also, NATO bombed Serbia.
How does he know? He created it
👍👍👍
He created the Daleks because Brzezinski looks like Davros from the British Doctor Who TV show! Rofl 😂🤣😂 LOL
Do we have the moral right to condemn Russians?
Who bombed Yugoslavia, Syria, Libya, Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan...
Why didn't you get outraged then???
Who turns a blind eye to the fascist units of ukriana "Azov", "Aidar"?
Who hid from the world community the genocide in Donbass, where more than 14,000 people died in 8 years?
Why were 150,000 Ukrainian soldiers concentrated on the border with Donbass?
Why did we applaud the drug addict Zelensky, who declared that he intended to create an atomic bomb?
Why are all Russian media blocked?
Why do the media cover only one side of the conflict?
The Western media are skillful factories of lies! Even presidents believe them…
The world has long been a hostage of diabolical democracy!!!
It has already been proven that Ukrainians themselves staged sinister provocations in Buchi, Crematorsk, thereby extorting lethal weapons…
There is not a single proof that the Russians are killing civilians!
The Russians are the only nation in the world that has fought evil all its history!
Back in 2007, Putin warned NATO that if it approached Russia's borders, he would respond. Then they laughed at him..
We woke up the Russian bear in vain… He will turn the whole world upside down and become the winner! This is understood by the Chinese, Indians and Arabs. The world is going through an unprecedented economic crisis. It's only going to get worse every day...
I'm against the war!!!! I am against fascists!!!!!!
PS Pray for the Russians, they are saving the world from the fascists!!! If Putin wanted to, he would have captured Ukraine in 10 days. All he had to do was bomb the cities of Ukraine, like the United States in Syria, the city of Raqqa...
The voice of real America - Lara Logan. She wasn't afraid to tell the TRUTH! Bravo!!!
th-cam.com/video/rXkFpu7pH2g/w-d-xo.html&ab_channel=SignsOfTheEndTimes%3F
The opinion of an American military analyst. The UN Weapons Inspector in Iraq.
th-cam.com/video/seDi09dFurk/w-d-xo.html
The only way to predict the future is to have the power to shape the future
What a real pos he was
Brzezinski is more measured in his analysis and not given to the hysteria of his compatriots. But the narrative by the interviewer is not correct. Russia did not invade Crimea, it already had a major military base and has never left Crimea for over 150 years.
"Crimea was part of Russia from 1783, when the Tsarist Empire annexed it a decade after defeating Ottoman forces in the Battle of Kozludzha, until 1954, when the Soviet government transferred Crimea from the Russian Soviet Federation of Socialist Republics (RSFSR) to the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic (UkrSSR)." - The Wilson Center.
Crimea which was handed over to Ukraine from Russia by the USSR as part of an alliance of economic and social integration between Russia and Ukraine. Ukraine's desire to become a part of NATO troubled the Russians and as a result - the people of Crimea decided to break away from Ukraine. It was a divorce and each side took back what they brought into the marriage.
One question that I have that is never discussed is how is the referendum in Crimea any different from Scotland's when it voted with regards to separating from the United Kingdom? President Trump is at peace with Crimea being reintegrated with Russia. Brzezinski said that Western Europe should not have integrated 10 [Eastern European] countries into NATO. Ukraine was their next target and it imploded against their expectations. Russia's strategy towards Ukraine is clear, use the vast Russian speaking population in Eastern Ukraine to keep a perpetual state of tension so that NATO will not absorb Ukraine.
The problem that I have with most of these geopolitical analysts is that they seem to start with the end-game - the geopolitical outcome they desire and then their analysis is fashioned to fulfill their goal. It is refreshing to see that Zbigniew Brzezinski is not part of that camp. Is Putin the CEO of Russia, quite likely, though not as wealthy as many of our western capitalists, but apparently the Russian people do not care. He has recovered their land (Crimea) which was handed over to Ukraine through their failed Communist experiment. Our biggest challenge in the United States is not Russia or even China - they are focused on the economic development of their nations, it is our Educational System and in particular STEM education.
The Bible says that in a multitude of counselors there is safety and so people like Brzezinski with vast experience should enter into the discussions more often. A foreign policy that is focused on short-term gain is in no one's interest. It is not too late to re-engage with Russia, the longer we wait and the more aggressive we are towards them, the more likely it is that they will align more deeply militarily with China. Even if Russia is not a close partner, three separate global military powers are better than two against one and unfortunately, we are fast moving towards that path.
- Op-ed written as Crimea was shaken by clashes in the prelude to the peninsula’s annexation by Russia: The U.S. could and should convey clearly to Mr. Putin that it is prepared to use its influence to make certain a truly independent and territorially undivided Ukraine will pursue policies toward Russia similar to those so effectively practiced by Finland: mutually respectful neighbors with wide-ranging economic relations with Russia and the EU; no participation in any military alliance viewed by Moscow as directed at itself but expanding its European connectivity. In brief, the Finnish model is ideal for Ukraine, the EU, and Russia in any larger east-west strategic accommodation. But to be credible to the Kremlin, the U.S. needs also to spell out privately that attempts to destabilize the emerging democracy in Kiev or detach parts of Ukraine-not to mention even overt or covert Russian participation in its neighbor’s domestic conflicts-would compel Washington to use its influence internationally to prompt steps that would be economically costly to Moscow. - Zbigniew Brzezinski (Financial Times, 02.23.14)
Too late dear , Russia and China announced a "friendship of no limits" in February 2022 .
@@tadasblindavicius8889 That was what Putin wanted too: a neutral model for Ukraine! But while he told Ukraine that they could be part of both the EAU and the EU, the EU told Ukraine it couldn't be part of both, and when the elected President asked for some more time, the USA backed the coup d'etat that dispose of him! In 2022, Kissinger said that Ukraine could abandon Crimea if it wanted peace, but the new generation attacked him. Bzrezinski and Kissinger were the architects who helped the USA win the Cold War, but their inheritors think of them as having fulfilled their role, they don't consider them relevant anymore.
The US cannot engage with Russia. Their whole international relations are built to keep Russia forever separate from the rest of Europe. That's why even though Russia is only about 20% worse than Ukraine in things like corruption etc etc, you will NEVER in your life time hear any proposal of Russia's integration with Europe after Putin is gone. Even if Russia turns very pro-European, they cannot be allowed to unite with Europe. If no one else, the fucking Polacks will make sure of it. One of the reasons why as a Slovenian I want out of the EU until Poland is thrown out.
Well you mention US foreign policies and you are correct ,have look "Wolfowitz Doctrine " which was declasified document after 30 years ...that document clearly explain the US role in geo politics after collaps of USSR ,first thing they did after collaps of USSR and East Block Warsaw Pact convinced senate to up millitary spending ? and gradualy increased NATO by all fromer " east block " countries ,creeping closer to Russian borders .That is not a sign of good will or copperation that is flexing the millitary power in Europe
Interestingly, he mentioned 10 countries, whom he deemed as neither ready for Europe nor having the qualifications to be in Europe, and didn't say their names to avoid making public enemies. In the Russian news very recently, they said that 10 countries opened accounts at Gazprombank so that they could buy gas in roubles. Are these the same 10 countries?
No, because some of those who opened the bank accounts were among the founders of the EU. He meant the late newcomers from Easter Europe.
He meant us. (Hungary.)
@@learning7140 Maybe that is what he meant though
@@Yorgos2007hello Hungary!
You are one of the few countries with a sane leader.
@@justmemimi7338 You can take him if you want, we won't miss that putinist.
Incredible prophetic analysis by dr Brzezinski, especially on Europe unifying against Putin as is happening now
th-cam.com/video/L9riC3944m8/w-d-xo.html
It was pre planned by the Davos Oligarchs , and this communist!
ZBIGNEE BRZEZINSKI USA planned War in Ukraina in 1992
Funny, I was thinking .. well that didn't age well.
I thought Europe had worked through challenges already.
What Vladolf has done is show nations are too small, strength in unity matters.
it's so interesting watching this these days ❤
A misunderstanding of a country's history is inevitably leading to bad management of the present and future existence
What a lark, ha. A pole telling Russians they misunderstand Russian history.
He is as Polish as Soros is Hungarian... Think! Open Your eyes. Was Stalin Russian? Nope...
There is only IMPERATIVE:
IT IS IMPERATIVE
that no Eurasian challenger emerges capable of dominating EurAsia and thus of also challenging America
-
Zbignew Brzezinski {Nicholas J Spykman} 😎
@@geoeconomics3067
-To isolate Ukraine internationally, Russian policymakers have also skillfully exploited the Clinton administration’s preoccupation with Ukraine's nuclear status. Playing on American fears (and the administration's evident preference for Russian control over Ukraine's nuclear weapons), Moscow was quite successful in portraying the new leaders in Kiev as a menace to international stability. Ukraine's ineptitude in conveying its concerns to the West also intensified its isolation and therefore its sense of vulnerability. - Zbigniew Brzezinski (Foreign Affairs, March/April 1994)
@@tadasblindavicius8889
There is only one IMPERATIVE:
IT IS IMPERATIVE that no EurAsian challenger emerges capable of dominating EurAsia and thus of also challenging America
-
Zbignew Brzezinski (Spykman)
@@RK1FX STALIN was RUSSIAN, RUSSIAN means ethnicity not place of Birth.
I would like to ask: About your idea of the "balkanization of Eurasia ". Mr. Brzezinski. Its' that what drives US foreign policy toward Russia?
of course...
he is the Architect of this mess.
For America the chief geopolitical prize is EurasiA (Russia)
-
Zbignew Brzezinski
What a fool. He completely misread the situation in Crimea. Took zero consideration re: Crimeans wanting no part in taking orders from Kiev/allegiance to Russia-yes THE PEOPLE of Crimea by a massive majority wanted to be part of Russia. He also fails to understand the maritime access benefit of Crimea to Russia and what that means economically/militarily. It’s almost as if ZBig is expressing his hopes rather than make a cold analysis of the situation. His comments have aged terribly.
But Russians in Ukraine cannot have the same rights as Albanians in Kosovo or the Scots in UK etc. Those are RUSSIANS!! LOL Yeah, as a Slovenian I have full support for any part of Ukraine that wants to democratically split from Kyiv.
*Divide and rule.*
Maybe "rule" is the incorrect word in regards to the USA, and *divide and "gain an advantage"* if others struggle, fight, and then lose, is closer to what happened. The word "rule" also constitutes a "trigger", or natural aversion, which would mean psychologically oposing a theory, simply based on the words used.
At the turn of the previous century ("around 1900") Washington DC set out to "divide (Europe)" and "gain" (from collective European madness).
Note how such a policy doesn't necessarily have to be co-ordinated politically.
So no "your a conspiwacy theowist"-allegations please, lol.
In regards to Europeans, the policy basically carried itself, and today *still* carries itself, because Europeans are already sufficiently divided on multiple levels. Any actions by a strong enough 3rd party wishing to gain simply needs to avoid any form of unity in Europe, or to "nip in the bud" any signs of formal/informal agreement between Europeans (the Cold War was of course an exception, when Western European unity was useful to stand up to Eastern European Communism/SU/Warsaw Pact).
One of the key strategies in "divide and rule" is to fund and support both sides in a world full of rivals for dominance, influence and markets.
*Once "divided", and kept divided, there is no "single voice" to stand up to a stronger entity.*
From wiki, and regarding the theory: "Divide and rule policy (Latin: divide et impera), or divide and conquer, in politics and sociology is gaining and maintaining power by breaking up larger concentrations of power into pieces that individually have less power than the one implementing the strategy."
Elements of this technique involve:
- creating or encouraging divisions ...
- to prevent alliances that could challenge ...
- distributing forces that they overpower the other
- aiding and promoting those who are willing to cooperate
- fostering distrust and enmity
Historically, this strategy was used in many different ways by empires seeking to expand their territories."
[editted for clarity re. the states/empires level of things]
*"Divide and gain" would work exactly the same way.*
There is an entire palate of examples of "dividing Europe" on multiple levels, and gain an advantage (see below comments thread for a few). These multiple examples are not "anecdotal", or "cherry picked", but form a pattern in a political game (in geopolitics/grand strategy = avoid the unity of "others", because unity = strength).
Regarding this policy, it needs a keen sense of observation by a nation's gatekeepers, so as not to inadvertently become a part of it.
*"Defeat Them in Detail: The Divide and Conquer Strategy. Look at the parts and determine how to control the individual parts, create dissension and leverage it." - Robert Greene*
And "observe the details" and "leverage" is what the American Internationalism fans (US corporatism) in Washington DC did, opposed by the ever-waning forces of US Isolationism, re-inspired by Donald Trump ("Trump Doctrine") and others...
All of these terms can be googled for more context.
Note that in order to play this game, the "divider" must have some form of advantage. In regards to Washington DC, this advantage which it could use to attract suitors was their own rapidly increasing power. Ever important markets acting like a lighthouse for capitalist ventures. But with a geographical advantage which made it virtually impossible to invade by the late-19th Century (grand strategy), the USA already had little to fear militarily.
What was "in it" for Washington DC in her favoratism of mostly Paris and London?
*London was Europe's only power that could effectively unite Europe, by acting as a unifying power as a matter of policy, rather than as an aloof divider herself.*
Regarding any form of united Europe, by whomever or for whatever reasons, the "gatekeepers of Empire" sat in London. A "united Europe" either with or without GB/Empire could only go through London and with London's approval. Ask Napoleon I. He knows what it resulted in when "gatekeepers" stepped forward to avoid any form of single continental unity or hegemony. These "gatekeepers" followed policies which made any form of unity impossible (per treaty, political, or as a result of wars between continental powers). At the first signs of unity/friendship on the continent, London would step in and divide using a variety of age-old, trusted and well-honed political skills up to the point of declaring preventive wars.
*A divided continent also suited London just fine: the newly united Germany, was wedged in between her two main historical rivals for territory and gain: France and Russia (geopolitics/grand strategy).*
The above is also known as the "avoid a single hegemony on the continent"-narrative, and is not disputed by most historians.
A disunited Europe at this point, also suited Washington DC just fine.
*It should not have "suited" London, because the world was changing.*
The USA's first really big attempt at expanding beyond the limits of the own Monroe Doctrine, and the "promises made" not to meddle in European affairs was Spain. With the Monroe Doctrine Washington DC stated: "Don't worry Europe, we are satiated..."
A declaration which would not last long.
LOL, no. They were *not* satiated.
After a period of strategic consolidation, leaders here were looking for easy targets whose spheres of influence could be expanded into with the formula "little ventured/a lot gained", and excuses which could be made for expanding which could be sold as "acts of benevolence".
The rapidly sinking Spanish Empire offered the territories as a "gateway to China" in the form of already annexed Hawaii, the Philippenes and Guam and protection for the seaways in between. The 1898 Spanish American War was then simply the torero sticking a sword into the neck of the dying bull...a fitting allegory. Obviously "triggered" by the Japanese annexation of Formosa in 1895.
To achieve all of this Washington DC needed European indifference for the cause of "weak failing empires" (Darwinism/Spain), and divided Europe happily complied...
*How to succeed here if Europe decided to unite and stand up to US expansion, by offering political support to Spain?*
Answer: favoratism.
"Favor" one "empire" (in this case France and GB) above others...temporarily.
It would be a mistake to think that these "divide and rule/conquer"-strategies and tactics started with the Roman Empire, and ended when the British left India in 1947 (Two examples usually referred to when historians examine this as a political practice). It is alive and well.
*It surrounds every aspect of power politics and has been ever-present on all levels of society and politics ever since the dawn of mankind.*
Today the US military doctrine of "Flexible Response" is nothing else but "divide and rule" in the disguise of "divide and gain": Divide Europeans, to enable the continued US domination of world affairs. It is the same strategy London/British Empire used as it tried to hang on to Empire. A flexible response = "hopping" onto a crisis or war without having to have done much to avoid it. Some of the rare historical anomalies are Chamberlain (Munich 1938) or Boris Jonson (Finland/Sweden 2022) because try as one might, one cannot find any other strategic incentive for these missions, other than the noble cause and an effort keep the peace, in the face of previous total failure.
Notice that one of the key strategies in "dividing" others is to take opposing positions in political issues, without these positions being based on moral standards or principles. Simply strengthen the position of one side in an issue at one time, then make a 180 degree about turn and support the other side another time. An example here is for the two Moroccan crises (1905 vs. 1911). In 1905, Washington DC actually tacidly supported the German position and insisted on Morrocan independence, protecting it from being carved up by France/Spain. In 1911, the USA chose the side of the colonial powers against Berlin's position, and signed Moroccan independence away to "the wolves" of colonialism.
Divide and gain: Historically the funding of opposing European ideologies, leaders and states. For example, US private funding of European dictators in the 1920s and 1930s, *and* at the same time supporting Stalin's Five-Year Plans, was a strategy which carried through to today.
*A geographical advantage meant that whatever happened in Europe would be a "win" for Washington DC power mongers.*
Or, one could state that if one is far enough away, one can "sit on the fence and await the outcome" when the shtf somewhere else.
Strategists can always count on a plethora of enablers who carry out such division, mostly for entirely independent causes: from "humanism" to "big business", one can become a tool of strategists. Politicians, business elites, journalists, historians, teachers...they can all contribute, without even being aware of the fact.
Everything very accurate, apart from one point:
Boris Jonhson's pact with Finland/Sweden isn't an anomaly because it did nothing to keep the peace, as there was no threat whatsoever to them from Putin in 2022 - on the contrary, it facilitated them abandon their long-held neutrality and safety, in order to apply for NATO membership. (NATO membership means participation in wars on behalf of the USA interests)
Yes , you are right. Politics and politicians seem ignoring moral principles . In case of the two Moroccan crisis1905 and 1911 are well illustrated this fact
Zbigniew Kazimierz Brzezinski is a Polish American political scientist, geostrategist, and statesman who served as a counsellor to Lyndon B. Johnson from 1966–1968 and held the position of United States National Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter from 1977 to 1981. Zbigniew Brzezinski was born in Warsaw, Poland, in 1928. His family, members of the nobility (or "szlachta" in Polish), bore the Trąby coat of arms and hailed from Berzeżany in Galicia in the Tarnopol Voivodeship (administrative region) of then eastern Poland (now in Ukraine). The town of Brzeżany is thought to be the source of the family name. He was born on March 28, 1928.
This photograph originates from the International Magazine Services photo archive. IMS was a editorial photo archive in Scandinavia founded in 1948 but evolved from older archives that have images in the collection also. The archive is in great condition and been in storage for a long time and the images in the collection are now being sold off one by one. The images in this archive where distributed in only 10-15 copies around the world at the time and many copies have been lost or damaged during time, each copy from the collection is therefore very rare and unique. This kind of rare images are not only a great thing to own but also a great investment. Own a piece of history with this great photography memorabilia. By purchasing a photo from IMXPIX Images, copyright does not transfer. We are selling these photos as collectibles only and no copyright is implied. Detected: OCR
NATO in Yugoslavia was first
just well spoken guy.... and retelling what was written in the script full of lies. so well spoken ... will drive you away from reality and and put you in the clouds where he also had been and he was in this video. nothing much to expect from the guy born in sovet time and driven by hate and revenge (rebel without cause). selling story about people based on information from .... no name stated or agency. just repeat the lie and will become true. sad old man
You speak sense
He even praised China dictators "exceptioanl leaders" in 2017. Amazing! This is how we came to this chaos today!
Keep in mind that China went all totalitarian only in recent years, this interview was made in 2017. Deng Xiaoping's liberal reforms allowed China to have perhaps the most impressive economic growth in history. They went from a 3rd world country to a technological hub and a rival to the US, you just can't deny that. They made some mistakes like the one child policy but generally China developed rapidly over the last 40 years.
@@MyPrideFlag In your logic, Hitler is also an exceptional leader. Nazi Germany made huge economic growth too during his time.
From a different angel, China has made significant progresses(in the past 30+ years) in undermining the system the West has built. As a "strategist" of the US, Brzezinski not only failed in advising to defend our value/system, but helped them succeed. By praising the dictators to be "exceptional" is mindblowing. He is the architect of all the chaos today!
@@slwang12 First of all Brzeziński was an advisor in 1977-81. In that time China wasn't a threat to the US, USSR was. And Brzeziński's actions helped to bring down USSR and gave your country decades of hegemony in the world. It has been 40 years since that time. If you want to blame someone for losing it, blame Bush or Obama's administration. But for me it was a natural order of things that no country can enjoy such a domination for too long.
A quick reminder, unlike Hitler (or the US), China didn't invade anyone. No Chinese leader after Deng Xiaoping is responsible for millon of deaths. And Hitler ultimately destroyed Germany.
As much as I condemn their totalitarian turn, Uighur camps, etc, comparing them (even Xi Jin Ping) to Hitler is simply wrong.
As I said they gave Chinese people unprecedented prosperity and made China a superpower. You just look from your point of view that China bad, they're a threat to the US, etc.
And don't make laugh with "protecting american values". I assume you're a republican (sorry if i'm wrong). Was Brzezinski's a priest? No, he was concerned with national defence and international politics. He was an expert on Soviet Union. And Soviet Union fell.
@@MyPrideFlag No, the victory over USSR has nothing to do with Brzezinski. It's the victory of freedom, the value of the west. The foundation he laid out 40 years ago is creating what we are having today in Russia and in China. My comments above is related to what he said in 2017 by praising dictators! Essentially, that's his mindset when he was architecting 40 years ago
@@MyPrideFlag The words of an acolyte.
these are great videos, thanks for uploading them
This mass murder planer should sit with lucifer bastard
Exactly
@@nebojsakecman862 He looks just like Davros from Doctor Who! Am I the only person on the internet who thinks that Brzezinski looks like and talks exactly like "Davros", the creator of the Polish-Canadian Daleks from the British Doctor Who TV shows?
John Mearschimer's video of the Western Coup in Ukraine for University of Chicago is data based fact based analysis.
It WASN’T a coup. Ukrainian parliament voted Yanukovych out.
Smooth talking devil masquerading as an angel of light
Go to church
*i always recognize a "DEMON" when i see one.*
Thank you very much for your brilliant perspective and insight
Number 1 illuminati puppet , brezenski !!!!! Truly evil person !
Global Population reduction is his idea.
He looks like Davros from Doctor Who! Am I the only person on the internet who thinks that Brzezinski looks like and talks exactly like "Davros", the creator of the Polish-Canadian Daleks from the British Doctor Who TV shows?
may he rot in hell with Satan together !
RUSSIA with Ukraina is global power
RUSSIA without Ukraina is regional power
-
Zbignew Brzezinski
Russia with China is….
Russia will never be with "some one". Ukraine Belarus etc... Russia will be on its own like any other nation. Why for Russia is so important to be with "some one"? USSR gone long ago. Forget "some one". Russia should built its own future.
very prevalent comment now in feb 2022 ..i agree
th-cam.com/users/shortsD5xJuyrUIIA?feature=share
@@mastervoice1924
All dictatorship regimes end up sooner or later. Russia on the way....
This guy has aged so much in such a short time, guilt has caught on I think
he was born in 1928 and died in 2017,the fact that he looked old(89 years old) had nothing to do with guilt....
Let's see how you will look, guiltless, in your 80s! :P
Henry Kissinger is alive and kicking, he just turned 99 , imagine that ? The Devil looks after his own !
2:35 that's plain wrong, 1999 US and its western europe servant states attacked Jugoslavija killing thousands of civilians and totally destroying the infrastructure, under the invented excuse to save albanians from serbian oppression (which was as valid as germany's excuse to invade poland 1939). Being an american makes you completely ignorant of your own crimes...
what are the kind of serious reforms , which Brzezinski told about Ukraine? I thing not only Ukraine which should attempt serious reforms, but every country in the world should do that way
Very intelligent man
In deciept yeah, not the best type of intelligence
If the evil is a inteligence than yes !
Very idiotic man
Evil mind...
Crimea "....first time since WWII that force was used in Europe"... Really? Ask Belgrade people and Bill Clinton (ah, BIllC advised by ZB, of course.!).
Exactly! That omission was no mistake. He is a deceiver. NATO bombed Serbia for 78 days straight.
There is no effective control of Europe without Balkans
-
Z Brzezinski
Panie Profesorze,
Lata minęły, a Pana i pańskich opinii nadal brak.
Wielka szkoda 😢🕯🖤🙏🏽
Dont listen to the words he is uttering but the message. This is a smart intellectual with evil ideas en beliefs.
the book is convicining. If you could drop some links to help understand your posisiton please do!
@@mateenfoster4595 what the fuck are you talking about.
He’s an analyst who worked for presidents. He even suggests a neutral Crimea so both countries don’t lay a claim on it, avoided suggesting war even with this unreal solution.
@@radagastthebrown578 LOL the book grand chessboard lol.
Cold war troll. Russians are going to win this one again 🙄
From the hindsight of early April 2022, there are only two word to describe his assessment: spot on!
he is the ARCHITECT of this Chaos going on...
This guy is delusional on purpose, a capitalist with colonial mentality.
NATO is a threat not only to Russia, it participating in bombing Yugoslavia and destruction of the Middle East.
Fake intellectual right here.
🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
I really don't know. I'm asking ...
4:37 min ... would, Crimea, be a stupid place to put the capital of the EU? ... if Ukraine became a member of the EU, and, EU agreed, and, Ukraine and Russia agreed, to Crimea becoming the EU Capital Territory (ECT) or EU Capital District (ECD) or EU Capital (EUC)... or EU Capital Region (EUCR) or e.t.c. ... ? ... with a new purpose built city, Europa or e.t.c. ... ? within that area, becoming the city that is the captial of the EU ... ? ... So that, for example, the capital of the EU would be Europa, in the EU Capital Territory/District/Region? .... (and, the EU Capital, would in addition, have it's own governance - not, Ukrainian or Russian or French or German or Belgium or Polish or Greek or e.t.c. .... ?, but the governance locally of Europa in the EU Capital Region: so that there would be two governments/parliaments: a local government for the actual running of the city/territory, made up of those who permanently live there, and, the government/parliament with all the seats, all the representatives, for all the members of the EU who travel from their own state/country to make decisions/debate/vote? ...)
Sorry for putting it like this ... but ...
What is more important: to make Putin pay and cripple Russia and therefore potentially providing an opening for Putin and Russia to, in effect, become ruled by China and be China - extending China into Euroasia and Europe, up to Ukraine's borders and increasing China's land based resources (like rare earth minerals, coal, oil, access to the arctic), production e.t.c.? ... Or ... for the EU (which essentially also includes the US, UK, e.t.c.) to stop squabbling and infighting, which is resource intensive, putting the whole world at risk, risking the start of WWIII, and which is literally destroying those purported to be in need of protection and being protected, to instead to form an alliance with Russia? ... wouldn't that open a gateway for diplomacy and trade with Euroasia and or the Middle East (Russia is part of Europe and Eurasia, as Turkey is part of Europe and the Middle East)? ... If Turkey and Georgia were part of the EU and EU had an alliance or special alliance with Russia ... how would the globe look then? .... proportionally, EU/UK/US compared with China/(Russia) or EU/UK/US/Russia compared with China?
How many American bonds is China earning interest from, enough to fund their military? How much does America owe financially to China? ... rules are rules, aren't they?
.... or .... How much is China funding America? ... is it, EU/UK compared with China/(US)/(Russia) or EU/UK/Russia compared with China/(US)?
"Memorandum on security assurances in connection with Ukraine’s accession to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons"
Was it not agreed to or signed by, Russian Federation, Ukraine, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, United States of America?
The UK and USA, don't have permission to enter Ukraine, to protect the border? ... Not NATO, but the UK and USA? .... and, because it is in writing, it is something that Russia would object to?
I really don't know. I'm asking ...
... would, Crimea, be a stupid place to put the capital of the EU? ... if Ukraine became a member of the EU, and, EU agreed, and, Ukraine and Russia agreed, to Crimea becoming the EU Capital Territory (ECT) or EU Capital District (ECD) or EU Capital (EUC)... or EU Capital Region (EUCR) or e.t.c. ... ? ... with a new purpose built city, Europa or e.t.c. ... ? within that area, becoming the city that is the captial of the EU ... ? ... So that, for example, the capital of the EU would be Europa, in the EU Capital Territory/District/Region? .... (and, the EU Capital, would in addition, have it's own governance - not, Ukrainian or Russian or French or German or Belgium or Polish or Greek or e.t.c. .... ?, but the governance locally of Europa in the EU Capital Region: so that there would be two governments/parliaments: a local government for the actual running of the city/territory, made up of those who permanently live there, and, the government/parliament with all the seats, all the representatives, for all the members of the EU who travel from their own state/country to make decisions/debate/vote? ...)
Short version:
... where is the current fighting? ... what is it over ... exactly ...? ... it doesn't look like it might cease any time soon. ... Would it be impossible, in that area, to convert the type ... of war ... from war of might to war of words?
i.e. Ukraine retain sovereignty, possibly join the EU, a section of Ukraine (with Ukraine's permission) become the de jure capital of the EU, a buffer area that is Ukraine and Russia
... NATO headquarters remain where they are ... ?
and, ... which agreement already assures Ukraines borders?
This wouldn't support military goals, with less negative impact on civilians than sanctions or lending/giving military equipment*, and or contribute to long term security, safety and lives of military personnel?
*military equipment (that might get scavenged/reverse engineered/sent elsewhere/on sold and or seized? ... and an increased risk, that, doesn't seem like it would be impossible to forsee: friendly fire, and, fingers point, as if otherwise?).
... distance of Ukraine ... possible EU de jure capital, international embassies ... Iranian oil ... ?
... if a section of Ukraine (with Ukraine's permission) becomes the de jure capital of the EU ... the US would need an embassy there ... as would the UK and Russia and e.t.c. ...
also,
... de jure capital of EU in Ukraine ... seems like there would be more cameras there then ....
... who can assist with knowledge and wisdom, to turn it into a historic moment? ... peaceful? ...
Stay well. Peace.
Eleonora Formato née Szczepanowski
South Australia
Sanctions ... aren't creating, or contributing to, a sort of Iron curtain ... ? Sanctions, historically, stop military spending? Sanctions don't impact civilians?
... "lesson militarily" ... and "effect of sanctions" ... ? ... seems like actions ... specifically going after civilians for strategic military gain ... seems like actions external to ... what's the administrative law position?
... separate and in addition to that though, what makes it ok to deny, an oligarch use of their property, or a General access to their own money while on vacation? ... if it's state owned or state money, then, they wouldn't be denied? ... where is the line, for denial of property ownership and use? ... a General doesn't necessarily have the wealth of an oligarch - more like, upper middle class wealth, comparable with those of the Chinese upper middle class ... no? I don't know. I'm asking.
If the financial/banking sector in other countries are run by some clever people who are competent, it seems like a shame, there is an attempt to strangle them with sanctions (sanctions: "three phases" ... "deter", "punish", "bankrupt" ... "coup"). I don't know, would asking them, instead, how they are organising things totally a stupid thing to ask?
On a different scale, over a similar region, isn't Ukraine in Europe? Isn't the part of Russia that surrounds the Ukraine, part of Europe? ... So, isn't 'it' all happening, in Europe? Between European countries?
Is Russia still a communist country? ... Russia isn't, at the very least, on it's way to being a a democratic country? ... it's not a capitalist type country now? ... Aren't sanctions being applied to businesses in Russia and those living in Russia who are wealthy?
It seems like, in away, with the support of other countries, NATO, it is just about all of Europe excluding a part of Europe and with economic sanctions? ... Isn't that a sort of Fascism?
This guy doesn't understand Russia even a bit. :)
I mean he was Polish who migrated to the US, and talking like he understands Russians more than the literal President of Russia.
The Poles have a bad history against the Soviet Union. Its hard to take what he says without a grain of salt.
Imagine being someone like him.. literally playing a game of chess where world governments are your pieces.
this man is a liar...
@Alex Gelbutovskiy how about you shit the fuck up everybody knows know Zbigniew Brzezinski is a fucking war criminal punk
NO he is not a liar
he is creating world for USA to be free or Challenger Free world
@@antonioribeiro2978
wrong
There is only one IMPERATIVE:
IT IS IMPERATIVE that no EurAsian challenger emerges capable of dominating EurAsia and thus of also challenging America
-
Zbignew Brzezinski (Spykman)
Didn’t know he was a russiaphobe.
Russia literally destroyed his country where he born.
Every Pole is russophobe
Yet another brilliant insight, shame that he is no longer with us. Unfortunately he was wrong on more than one point.
Only a Pole could be so completely wrong. I know, my grandfather was from Poland, his son (my uncle) pissed away his estate without even trying. The Polish are the most self destructive group in Europe and that says a lot. Carter was a fool.
@@TimotheeLee yo what that's some blatant racssm there
@@ghengiskhan9308 The Poles are a race? Is that a joke.
@@TimotheeLee I think you'll find balkans or Arabs are the most self destructive. Poles at least built back their cities and have strong values
@2:25 Was it as transforming as when force was used, contrary to your opinion, when NATO decided to dismantle Yugoslavia using around 30,000 bombs and missiles? Isn't it a little strange that while your own published perspectives and analyses on international relations and conflicts, including those in the Balkans, were influencing policymakers, academics, and the public on the region and yet here you claim that 2014 represents the first time since WW2 that force was used in Europe. Did Russia use more than 30K bombs to rip Ukraine out of the hands of Ukrainians? Did Crimeans suffer from Putin's bombs and are they still suffering the trauma from this event today as are the people who once constituted Yugoslavia? Is this the position of your son in Poland, as well, and your daughter in the USA, both of whom seem to be continuing your legacy of Russophobia? Is it really sad for your family that fear no longer holds sway over Europe with respect to Russia? Not very inviting of a peaceful Europe and an open continent in my humble opinion.
COULD SOMEBODY EXPLAIN FOR ME ... what is he saying at 5:25 - 5:29 - "quither things are headed" ?!?!? What is he trying to say ? I don t understand him, pls explain
He means that Russians were looking forward to quieter times, which were not to materialise.
The word is 'whither'
Those Russia Hater does he still Alive , Maan Bad People Live so Long They are Never die early as Good People ?
Great insight
Treating people just like pawns in chess.
Wait til his judgment day comes.
-Black Sabbath
Zbignev somehow accidentally forgot the illegal use of power against Yugoslavia
And turkey in Cyprus
😂
You can dislike the guy, but at least he’s honest and doesn’t fall back to political newspeak
"if Putin starts another wave of cold war unilateral actions..." This is the opposite of what Russia has done under Putin's leadership, but hatred of Russia is the absolute cornerstone of Zbig's world view.
Prophetic!
It’s not prophetic when you’re a part of the group PLANNING it !!
Yeah, one of orchestrators of war in Ukraine. I bet Victoria Nuland and John McCain consulted from him how to stage the coup in Ukraine.
Really. Russians are winning the war...
@@GIDSKID100 That is correct nothing prophetic here ,good old US foreign policies" play book" at work
Russia invaded Krim?
Wow look at all the Kremlin shills going NUTS haha...
You would go nuts too if your country would become target for destruction. Russia is the only obstacle on the way to NWO.
@@ArthurD Putin is a thirsty landgravber.
Brilliant !!!
Panie Psorze, chyba w najblizszych latach wynalazek aptekarza polskiego troche na wartosci straci, a jesli nie to sie chyba rynek skurczy. Chcialbym doczekac wypowiedzi Psora-Bricks i przemysl swiatowy, ale to juz chyba w Niemczech. PZDR.Grzesiek
So, is this why the US needed for Russia to go into Ukraine? Europe was slipping away and they figured that if Putin will go East, then Europe will get scared again, get united, and come back to the US?
Russia invaded Ukraine and scared people all by itself. To say US “needed” it is very twisted.
@@micah4242 people who think that Russia has "invaded" Ukraine are victims of propaganda and brainwashing.
@@masternmargarita Oh really? What do you call unprovoked bombing and shooting, targeting civilians? What is your authoritative news source??
@@micah4242 Remember, when you see adjectives next to the noun, like "unprovoked bombing," that's a sign of brainwashing. They add "unprovoked" strategically and repeat on all news and then repeaters like you repeat their filthy lies.
@@masternmargarita What was the provocation in your opinion? And don’t insult me by saying “denazification.” There is actually nothing that could justify such indiscriminate killing of civilians. I know it’s not “fake news” because I look on sites like Airwars and Forensic Architecture that analyze metadata to collect time, date and location of video. They will identify fakes on both sides.
U SEE GUYS HOW HE SUBLİMİNALLY STRESSED OUT THE PIVOTAL IMPORTANCE OF THE PRIVATE SECTOR
Thank God Zbigniew is gone !.. Center for Strategic & International Studies ..for WWIII ?
For America the Chief geopolitical prize is Eurasia
-
Zbignew Brzezinski
europe should ally with russia and china.
What do they have in common? Nothing.
No, the destruction of the Soviet Union is one of the best events in history of mankind.
Foundations of Geopolitics
The book emphasizes that Russia must spread Anti-Americanism everywhere: "the main 'scapegoat' will be precisely the U.S."
In the United States:
"Russia should use its special services within the borders of the United States to fuel instability and separatism, for instance, provoke "Afro-American racists". Russia should "introduce geopolitical disorder into internal American activity, encouraging all kinds of separatism and ethnic, social and racial conflicts, actively supporting all dissident movements - extremist, racist, and sectarian groups, thus destabilizing internal political processes in the U.S. It would also make sense simultaneously to support isolationist tendencies in American politics."
--Alexander Dugin, Russian Military Subversion specialist (Adviser for Kremlin)
Look into connections between Zbig and Dugin, they have met and Dugin now openly claims he’s moving pieces on Zbigs Grand Chessboard.
Isn't it what US/UK/NATO doing against Russians...
See Col. Richard Black's interview "US Leading World To N..." (for Schiller Institute) for more details. They will surprise you.
@@newkodiaq
"I would describe it as the heart and soul of Soviet intelligence - was a subversion. Not intelligence collection, but subversion: active measures to weaken the West, to drive wedges in the Western community alliances of all sorts, particularly NATO, to sow discord among allies, to weaken the United States in the eyes of the people of Europe, Asia, Africa, Latin America, and thus to prepare the ground in case the war really occurs. To make America more vulnerable to the anger and distrust of other peoples."
Oleg Kalugin, Ex-KGB Major General (retired)
Are you kidding, who gave him the title of "Military Subversion specialist"? Nothing of the sort.
"not to say that I welcome this"
Another monster of the last 60 years!
Dissolving the Russian empire good, building EU empire ...🤔🤔🤔... good?
talibans$$$$$
⭐
not the first time there was war in europe. nato bombed serbia. just because it's from america, doesn't make it not a war.
"Hitler and Mussolini were not putting away big cash." 06:58. Wow.
Russian..Say bye bye to Ukraine owned by the west no war
Mraz!
his son continues his imperial work now in poland
This man was Palpatine...
Plagueis, s'il vous plaît. Look at his detachable nose! Compris?
Panie Zbyszku (przepraszam za smialosc) sytuacja byla inna ale ta sama robote dla wolnosci co zrobil Kopernik zrobif tez Frycek Chopin w XIX wieku nuty po amerykansku nazywajac. Wiem ze pojecie "swiat "jest zbyt obszerne zeby spokoj byl. Moj kanal na youtube Panie Psorze-"armonica diatonica player ". Zem se w Milano jest. Grzesiek
He forgot Yugoslavia..
I regret he is not alive today. I would love to hear him now.
remarkable quasi prophet: Z.B he has definitely explained the horizon scenarios of the next history of Europe, Russia and China
замечательный кукловод и Массон
It's part of global strategy
It's Davros from Doctor Who! Am I the only person on the internet who thinks that Brzezinski looks like and talks exactly like "Davros", the creator of the Polish-Canadian Daleks from the British Doctor Who TV shows?
musolini had a huge villa
First time since wwII?
whos watching this in 2022
Great mind.
Not about video but Ruzzians crying all over the place
Great Man. R.I.P. 🇺🇸🇵🇱✌️
Narrative started around 2017 when both the Ukrainian and Russian story can be predicted?!
Narrative started in early 90 es after collaps of USSR but ,I'm not sure if you were around to notice that ...
faked news Russia dis not invade Crimea !!!!
It did invade my salad.....Russian dressing everywhere.
Putin himself said it did.
Clarine Berry it wasnt their territory
They werent invited
The referendum took place after the russian troops arrived
How can you say that the russians didnt invade?
You just dont like the term
'Frustrated by the wasted effort, and with demands for action from their citizens, the allied commanders decided to attack Russia's main naval base in the Black Sea: Sevastopol on the Crimean peninsula. After extended preparations, allied forces landed on the peninsula in September 1854 and marched their way to a point south of Sevastopol after winning the Battle of the Alma (20 September 1854). The Russians counterattacked on 25 October in what became the Battle of Balaclava and were repulsed, however the British Army forces were seriously depleted as a result.' (Wiki) i wonder why he did not start his tellings with the crimean war of 1853-55. We all use the Internet. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crimean_War
Correct
USA planned financed organized take over of Ukraina
to separate Ukraina from Russia
why ?
RUSSIA with Ukraina is global power
RUSSIA without Ukraina is regional power
-
Zbinew Brzezinski
Great thinker!! RIP
Deep down, he was an appeaser. He said it himself with the "shared Crimea" reward for Russia's aggression.
USA invaded Ukraina
than
Russia invaded Crimea
Russia was in Crimea for over the last 100 years. They just didn't leave.
time to economic relations
Here is a brilliant individual whose contributions significantly shaped the 20th century and whose work remains pertinent today. RIP Brzezinski
to say that the EU is the united states of europe just seems really ignorant and idk if i can listen to 10:38 minutes of this after such a bad start
The only way to predict the future is to have the power to shape the future.
His predictions were only possible because he was the one shaping the future.
I dont miss him at all.
Dual status entity for Ukraine, will be better than an alliance of Ukraine with NATO. Unfortunately the political leaders in Ukraine are not well qualified to understand this aspect of the reality3. The war startedin 24 February 2022 has given right to zbegniew brezensky opinion stated here in 2017...the political leaders seems don't understand the lessons of history
I believe the money thing is a lie!
Gadzia energia w Domu moim 💖Unicestwiona 🔻🇮🇱⚫Zostanie🔻⚫
Zjebana🤡jesteś🤡mocno🤡
Satan will have to move over to make way for this entity.
I don’t think your analysis accepted by anyone given your biased view on Russia 🇷🇺 our world is changing China Russia and India and Brazil are the new players.
3 of those don't even equal California's gdp LOL
Another vampire scared as the light closes in.
♥♥♥♥