Deleuze Guattari: Societies of Control and Antipsychiatry
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 ส.ค. 2024
- This is a 43 min video presentation, the text can be read here the-simulon.blo... the information concerns a very important global issue of today on the subject of techno-cybernetic control of governments and society that is responsible for a great number of technologically unrelated global issues such as global capitalism, social media, social control, global exploitation, the global elite, bio-power, trilateral and unilateral economic domination, civil war, war in the Middle East, colonization, the world economy, Third World exploitation, famine, environmental issues, the politics of race, gender, sexuality and mental illness. A subject that is rarely if ever discussed in a global context. It was derived from a transcript I wrote on Gilles Deleuze's 1990 'Postscript on the Societies of Control' inspired by Gary Hall, Clare Bichall and Peter Woodbridge's 2010 text and video 'Deleuze's Postscript on Societies of Control' published in Culture Machine. It includes as well a historical overview of the antipsychiatry movement in France which Felix Guattari participated during the 1960's and 1970's. Integrated into the theory, the presentation also shows an exact correlation of Norbert Wiener's principle thesis of Cybernetics with the Deleuzian-Guattarian concept of gaseous and fluidic forms and flows of corporate capital in today's society, the micropolitics of control, deterritorialized assemblages, and distributed networks such as the internet, Facebook, social community organizing in neocapitalist democracies, IBM agenda, global policing, military police, community organization, enforcement and manipulation by technological monitoring and scanning of public spaces and information privacy issues. Social democracy and corporate governance is theorized in a post-structuralist interpretation of emerging globalization issues and pinpoints some of the mechanisms involved suggesting that politicians and the corporate entities that run their embodied governments (including the monetary economic system) are manipulated by humans who in turn are being controled at a higher level by invisible technological processes of cybernetics. A generalized model of technological control and cybernetic government -- the cutting edge of contemporary 'conspiracy' and cultural theory. If you follow the discourse of Zizek, Noam Chomsky, Chris Hedges, the occupy movement, Jean Baudrillard, simulacra, transhumanism and The Matrix movies you will gain immense insight and a philosophico-scientific account of what has been going on in the world today and the world of tommarow.
![ง้อ (ALRIGHT) - FOURTH Prod. by URBOYTJ [ OFFICIAL MV ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Qs8ZeV6Dqj8/mqdefault.jpg)
This is so rich with insights it looks new every time I watch it.
This is an awesome production. A thoroughly enjoyable evocation of D&G. I didn't even know how to be a person before reading their stuff.
This video sent me on a path many years ago, and it gets richer all the time. This channel is utterly mysterious to me, the blog even moreso, if anyone has context I'd love it.
I fear this essay will be as prophetic as Marx's Capital, over a hundred years' ahead of its time. Marx predicted almost to the letter what is happening now with global late-stage capitalism and the over-financialization of society, where through debt we enslave ourselves to the contradictions of capital.
It's not too late to turn things around, and we are seeing that happen with the rise of a global left movement, but this essay predicts what will happen if we fail. Pretty terrifying, especially if you consider that if we lose, capitalism will so thoroughly destroy our planet and material standards of living that cybernetic control would HAVE to be implemented to prevent 11 billion people from revolting against their masters.
Well, now I know what a computer on Valium sounds like.
Not as good ? as a british dude on Valium ?
Audio Pervert I can’t say for sure, but I doubt any human on Valium would be able to focus on any single topic for more than 5seconds. I could be wrong.
This how normies BLOCK OUT the truth 🤭
@@trickbaby8441 cringe, we're on a deleuze and guattari vid here, bro. no so-called normies in sight
Many of us have wondered why a man writing against cyberism would use a robot to read us his paper.
Many people who get knowledgeable enough to write a paper like this one, have reached their sixties or later by that point, by which point they may also have lost enough breathing function, that they cannot complete reading a sentence in a single breath, nor draw the next breath within the time that fits intelligible recitation of the text. This would be bad enough while reading the fluffiest prose, but when reading extremely advanced material like this, so-much the-worse. And also, they would have lost the part of their vocal compass any more than a tiny bit below their regular speaking pitch, adding an unacceptable vocal artifact every few syllables or so.
Before the Internet, recorded speeches would have been published formally, with the budget to hire a "paid reader" to do the recitation, but with "self-publishing," a publishing "budget" is often nonexistent.
Lots of people can not "recite" their own writings "intelligibly" or esthetically acceptably, into a recording microphone.
This is why they would resort to, using a robotic narrator, to get the job-done "semi-decently," even realizing it's still quite "sub-ideal."
Thank you.
writer did not put this online (using algorithm to read)...
Oh come on!! 😂 Seriously?
Remember what teacher say about people who assume... 💁♀️
Or the person can have a speech impediment. Or they can be securing anonymity. Infinity of possibilities why should anyone chose yours?
@@trickbaby8441 Because mine is clearly much more common than any of those ones you mentioned, obviously.
deleuze and ga tree
It is more difficult to realize how and to wich extent we are slaves than actually breaking free
Eh what do you mean ?
I always found Chomsky lectures and interviews immanently useful and highly illuminating well beyond what Continental philosophers say about power, politics, etc. (Not that those deep thinkers are wrong). Chomsky gets right to what it means in plain English and without oversimplification.
really incredible video Jer Jae, thanks for making...
Taking into consideration that you are just beginning to read Deleuze, I would recommend the Deleuze Dictionary. The entire notion of a Deleuzian dictionary is very counter intuitive but it is actually quite helpful. Deleuze never uses the same word with with the same meaning twice but the text does a fairly good job presenting the general context and the lines of flight.
Well written clear elucidation of ideas and reading of D&G. Ironic computer voice works well.
Jack Da Rida
Ruff Rydaz !
This sounds very nice. I have a bigger background with deleuzes texts on other philosophers (nietzsche, bergson, spinoza, kant, etc) but am finally coming into more of the stuff he did with guattari.
this video may be a bit more tolerable if the voice was actually a human voice. I mean, what are you critiquing here? It is completely contradicted by the fact that im listening to a robot. gooodnesss
I feel like the robot actually heightens the experience because of the contrast.
i cant believe this is seven years old
What is this
@@apmire a coincidence
@@sjuvanet Guess everything is. But what's this video about.
@@apmire covers the philosophers in the title, explains some of their ideas. idk
important video
well done. very interesting. thanks
this vid is torture, i'm sure Deleuze won't stand for it if he could.
Please advise where violence against Deleuze occur.
+Hans Mateboer you could say he might even jump out a window....
why?
Paul Hanson
he committed suicide be defenestration...why? That's a big question
yes. i wasn't sure who you were talking to, Deleuze or the author of the video
Yes, please let me know if you need any files and want to discourse with me. I need to practice my english!
the subject matter sounds fascinating. surely the strange computerized voice over is itself trying to convey a point, but incurred in me what felt like the onset of a nightmarish fit. couldn't, sadly, stomach it for long. :-(
This is great! Have you read any of Tiqqun's stuff? Intro. to Civil War, This is not a Program....There's also a really interesting text called Politics is not a Banana. I have pdf. files of each if you find yourself interested. I'm also fairly certain each of these are open-source and free online.
This is astounding! Did you write this? If so, could you please provide a link to the text? I would very much like to read it.
Swimming through toffee.
Would love to have heard this..badly missed opportunity.
controls minds,machines
where can we see more of these videos ?
Why do people put these random videos and bleeping background muzak .. to a text that is of such importance? The content itself in a strange way speaks of zombie life which Deleuze and Gauttari spoke of ...
They claim the welll being of the human mind.
Did you play Metal Gear Solid 2, younger ?
Sick beatzzzz
the background music is distracting and nerve wracking
You'd do better to just read William Burrough's The Job.
there's now a version of this with a human voice. but i prefer the one with the robot voice:3
Yes, it adds a lot the to the "control" feeling, I love it.
Can you please provide a link?
All societies are societies of control: the
type of control comes down to means and ends.
Just the spectacle.
is this a,test?
The content is great but the robot voice sucks, obviously... I still feel like Gilles Deleuze was too pessimistic about capitalism just because it was fashionable in France during this time.. maybe If he were alive today he would less communist.
dogmatic adherence or not at all!!!
A video on the nefarious effects of cybernetics with... a robot narrator. Is this a joke or is OP kinda stupid?
OP is probably uncharismatic / not a competent public speaker. Also I found the irony strangely immersive.
Not gonna listen to a droid for 44 minutes, thank you
Yeah, I lasted about 10 seconds.
@@Pugetwitch you probably missed something really beautiful, the voice was chosen by purpose
Slavoj Zizek = Slalom Sosick
really irritating voice - I'd rather read the paper
creepy
paranoid intellectual conspiracy theories, Deleuze's arguments fall apart or at least severely weakened when you question the implicit assertion at the heart of his writing.
+ppwalk05 and your claim falls apart at the point in which you claim there's an implicit assertion at the heart (or center) of his writing...
Deleuzeshammerflow he does take a particular epistemological position.
+ppwalk05 so you assert that deleuze''s societies of control is incorrect ?
How would you characterize that epistemological position?