Hope you enjoyed this video of Smartest Person in the World. Please comment here your feedback about this video and also let me know for any other topics, for which you would be interested to know the data. I will surely respond with a video for the same! Thanks for watching! 👍
Where is Rowan Atkinson? he is not on this list and he has the iq of about 178. also, Issac newton did not have the iq of 200, it is about 193, close though!
@@spidermotionstudios2718 yes, he does not have an iq of 205, but he has 175 iq. idk where you're getting your facts from [edit] i just found a page online that says 160. i hope you learn your little lesson, *'do not always agree with the first thing that pops up on the internet'*
@@jacknack6819 Many of these IQ figures are "Alleged" only. Some are completely false... I saw a figure for Garry Kasparov for 190... Kasparov took a battery of tests in the 1980s.... memory... IQ... He scored 135 IQ... now much older his IQ is suddenly 190? This is bull shit.
@@fermansmith6042 iq test are different like if I was 7 and took mensa I could get a low score despite having really high test or if I take a test for 4 year olds I can easily get all them correct.
@@arrow1414 The IQ test has been proven time and time again to be a inadequate way of judging how smart someone is. Smartness isn't a messurable thing, what the IQ test really does is test how acedemically advanced someone is. Not to mention, folk have in the past lucked out on the IQ test from guessing. Even better, I call it "the" but there are too many versions of the IQ test to count.
All the IQ's listed above 200 in this video are purely estimates. It is extremely difficult to measure an IQ that high because most IQ tests don't go that high on the scale.
Actually, all the "estimates" over 200 are demonstrably BS. IQ is defined as 100 being average with a standard deviation of 15. As such, given the current population of the world, the smartest living person has an IQ of 196 BY DEFINITION.
A black man is only a basketball player but here in Africa we got young boys that make cars using scraps and they never went to school. Plz they must test them too
@@vaibhavkadam1439 It should be stated clearly that this is a set of subjective assumptions. Otherwise you will get people quoting from it as though these are proven figures
tesla goes hard, and maybe your right, maybe no one has ever been smarter or even will be, but that has nothing to do with iq, and marlyn vos savant has the highest iq.
@@polite8317 Ainan Celeste Cawley (IQ score of 263) William James Sidis (IQ score of 250-300) Terence Tao (IQ score between 225 and 230) Marilyn Vos Savant (IQ score of 228)
Because it what an estimate, is was calculated by how advance they were at there time, by different subject they focused on and how far that got with it in there time of study
You realise that an iq of above 200 would essentially allow you to predict exactly what will happen in the next couple minutes from one action that you make. This is BS
Wrong. IQ is not a skill. It is a measure of potential. Besides that, IQ has many varieties--some score higher on math, others on spatial, verbal, whatever. Ability to predict outcomes of every action is ludicrous, or smart folk would have already solved the world's problems. By the way, what formula do you use for that weird theory? It's really baseless, unless you know something we don't. Which is very possible, of course...
I would bet money that his IQ isn't that high,but his basketball IQ was off the chart.Not a hater.He is my all time favorite basketball player and the GOAT.
@@holeephuk6972 gronk is in his 30s and caught two tds in the Super Bowl still doesn’t say anything about his intellect. MJ had a high Basketball IQ but he was 6’6’ and the most athletic person in the world. Winning rings has nothing to do with what’s on IQ tests
Haaà ! Failure is a point of view.... I came " THIS CLOSE " to getting married twice , and if I ever see either of those women again.... I'll THANK THEM from the bottom of my heart ! Haaà..
How is it possible that Galileo Galilei has that IQ? He lived many years ago, human intelligence advances and no matter how intelligent he was, he does not compare to today.
What he actually said was - why don't you ask Sir Isaac Newton. Stop watching conspiracy theory videos. Tesla was an apprentice electrician working for Westinghouse.
@@scientificdevil4672 Tesla is somewhat overrated by conspiracy freaks but even so he was quite intelligent and made some valuable contributions to electrical power generation.
@@joeschembrie9450 Average iq is 100... No wonder conspiracies are successful. You have teletubies saying Tesla is OVERRATED lmao... He literally plugged a lightbulb into the ground and it light up. He had thousands of inventions that were seized by the very same evil people that kidnap your children to this day, again, because you have iq of 100
Tesla's IQ is ruled out to be 185. He was already using radio controls and fluorescents when Edison was struggling to create the carbon fiber light bulb. He has several inventions that science, even 100 years later, cannot explain. And he used them and proved that he was not a fraud. I think he's the smartest human being of all time.
William james has the most iq blw 250 to 350 He made his own language when he was 9 He know 8 language when he was 8 year old Nikola Tesla Has iq blw180 to 310 Everyone believe he has 310 iq einstin said that Nikola Tesla is the smart man on planet
There are so many errors here. Tyson's IQ is 160; he went to the Bronxc H.S. of Science where the average IQ is 135. Hawking 160. Leonardo, 207. Worst of all is Sidis. He is considered the highest at 300! Fischer, 187.
Standard IQ test scoring maxes out 200. Anyone claiming higher is most likely making it up. Or they're using a non-standard system in which case the number is meaningless without knowing the scale and standard distribution of the test they took. I have a cousing that could get 300 on a test that goes to 800 with an typical result of 400. And I'd score about 600-620.
Your answer is a bit ambiguous. Are you saying Tyson actually has an IQ of 160 rather than the "quoted" or "alleged" 123? I have heard about a score of 160 for Hawking ..however, was that on the Cattell ( sp) scale, where around 161 equates to 132 on the Stanford Binet? Of course Leonard da Vinci has to be an "estimate" only. Sidis.. was incredible but his IQ an estimate also.
@@kaseyboles30 That is incorrect. It is pretty much impossible to measure IQs higher than 150. On top of that, the US American "scale" is very inflated and the testing is done differently than in Europe. Most US claims of 160+ and such nonsense barely make 140 in the EU calibration.
How many folks realize IQs neither measure "how smart one is" nor do they portend a person's impact on the world stage. IQs basically reflect a person's capability/potential for mental significance. My last IQ number came up at 175...and believe me, I'm no mental giant or life-long over-achiever! After all, how many can truly describe themselves as "a stable genius?"
Most of the people above Einstein: yeah, no. Where are their great achievements up there with the Theory of Relativity?? Accomplishments should be the sole determiner of intelligence, not the ability to memorize and repeat verbatim.
@@johnsulvarta4837 Cumulative intelligence should be measured after a person dies based on sheer scientific or academic accomplishments. I think being able to take tests well or having an eidetic memory belies true, groundbreaking intelligence like Einstein possessed.
@@johnsulvarta4837 You are telling him to stfu? Really? You can’t just make up your own definition of intelligence, intelligence is your brain power, you can know everything in the world but when it comes to a life or death situation the more intelligent person is likely to servive because they can problem sole better and faster. Look at a computer. The cpu is the brain of a computer, the cache and hard drive are the computers short and long term knowledge, whereas the clock determines the speed, and the alu determines how calculations are performed. Your intelligence is your cpu, a better cpu means you are much smarter and faster, it doesn’t matter how big your hard drive is. Intelligence has two definitions, one is the gathering of intel, but it only means that in a military or defence point of view. The other is the biological definition, I suggest you listen to this guy and actually do some research. There is a word called ‘ignorant’ it doesn’t mean you are stupid, it means you are without knowledge in a particular felid, you are ignorant.
@@user-uq1fq6gs3i there’s multiple definitions of intelligence, that one you’re using is the most popular , but it’s more useful to distinguish intelligence from smarts , what’s your word for someone who knows a lot about a lot of things
@@johnsulvarta4837 Someone that knows a lot is knowledgable, clear, smart. We sometimes say they are intelligent (this is okay is normal everyday language but in terms of Biology and iq it is factually incorrect). For example in everyday language people say ‘oh I’m going to weigh myself on the scales’ however you don’t measure weight on scales, you measure mass because weight is a force in Newton’s. What’s my point? My point is that people use words interchangeably in everyday language but that doesn’t mean they are technically right. I might call a knowledgeable person intelligent but that doesn’t mean that their fluid intelligence is actually that good. By your definition I am more intelligent than Einstein (and I can guarantee you I am not) because I am much more knowledgable, I’m being serious, I factually know a lot more than Einstein ever did because I have more and better qualifications. I have a Masters in mathematics and a phd in mathematical sciences, I am also now studying for a bachelors in computer science (which is why I used the computer analogy in the last comment haha). But I am not as intelligent as Einstein, I know more but he had a great way of thinking, and therefore could achieve greater things. Fluid intelligence and crystallized intelligence are different things, you are thinking of crystallized intelligence, which is classified as a type of intelligence but not in the same sense as iq, real biological intelligence refers to fluid intelligence. crystallized intelligence is accumulating knowledge, Fluid intelligence is your way of thinking (this is more commonly used as a measure of real intelligence)
Note: if a person tells you someone has an IQ over 195, they are wrong. It's a fact that they're wrong. There's only enough people in the world to "cover" 197 IQ, as far as I remember.
@@Termenz1 From my understanding, those limits are based on probabilities, and so would be considered extremely unlikely, but not impossible. Keep in mind that each generation is building upon the technological and scientific advancement of the previous one, thus the greatest minds of the new generations are being exposed to a greater understanding of how systems work, thus those neural pathways would see a subtle, steady increase generationally, making a slightly higher maximum IQ more plausible.
There was a research paper posted online about two years ago written by a high-profile psychological research group in which they said that it's very difficult to measure an IQ that is over 140. As I recall, their consensus was that most IQ's that are very much over 140 are erroneous numbers and that the most likely scenario is that those extremely high IQ's are actually somewhere around 140.
What they do is assume an IQ based upon their achievements and other factors like observational and making interconnections, all these can only be educated guesswork.
If The standard deviation SD=15 then If we Have 2 billion people The smartest is 193IQ If we using SD=24 then we get 248,8IQ The Singapore Kid scored The world Record IQ points 263IQ That IS a joke! The Best chess computer programs play chess 229IQ level and These computers Beat the world champion Magnus Carlsen 99-1 If this Singapore Kid Beat The Best chess computer programs and compose 200 Symphonies and cure for cancer! BUT nothing They can do! Savant and Langan 200IQ points No Big things from These Two! Nothing can they do These 200IQ people! The real smart people Are Andrew Wiles solved Fermat last theorem! Grigory Perlman solved Poincare conjecture! Grigory Sokolov playing Brahms piano concerto no 2 With The Finnish Radio Symphony Orchestra from 1996 video TH-cam! Grigory Sokolov might Be The only one really over 200IQ points level!!
When Einstein was ask how it felt to be the smartest man on the planet, he replied "I don't know, you'll have to ask Nikola Tesla". This list is a joke.
Yall miss the point, Albert Einstien with 160iq achieved something that someone with 300 couldn't. Please understand Iq isn't everything. I'm not just saying this because I am terrible, it's because I only have an iq of 155. And, I'm in grade 8 doing undergraduate math problems with my tutor. So please don't be discouraged.
Hmm I cannot touch this one... if you are a kid , will not assume the "ATTACK mode" but most of what you have said it is correct. 155 IQ is very high depending on what scale is used.
Bobby Fischer against Boris Spassky 17 wins 11 losses! Magnus Carlsen would Beat The Prime Boris Spassky easily 6 wins 6 draws no loss! My old computer tought 5:22 minutes Capablanca-Reti game move! Same computer tought 4:37 Kasparov-Kramnik game move! Capablanca better than Kasparov! Capablanca would Beat The Prime Boris Spassky easily 8 wins 5 draws no loss! Boris Spassky was The weakest chess world champion Ever!!
@@RaineriHakkarainen Russian guys used to play like mafia guys. A massive team of con men trying to sell to the world an ugly ideology. There was no fair play in those cold war times.
@@simonscardino4135 Fischer against Boris Spassky 17 wins 11 losses! Fischer Beat Taimanov 6-0 Taimanov was The classical pianist! Taimanov played The piano! Fischer tought chess 98% of his Time 15 hours a day! Poor Taimanov played The piano
1:43 185 is wrong his iq was estimated to be at most 310 google it and it was estimated because he never took the test which would make him the worlds smartest man eat that Edison 🤣🇷🇸💪🧠⚡️
They look at the skills that they have or how they solve some problems and also they even look at what age did they learn to walk, read, calculate etc.
The only people who should be on the list are those who proved without doubt they enhanced scientific fields, like Einstein, Hawking, Galilei, Euler, Leibniz, Young, Tesla, Clausis, Newton, Copernicus, Maxwell, da Vinci, and Gauss. All others may appear smart without being that smart. There are probably a lot more who are missing, like Euclid, Pythagoras, Heron of Alexandria, Archimedes, Fibonacci, Descartes, Kepler, Volta, a lot many more.
100 gets lower every generation because that value was assigned to represent the average. So as we evolve and become more intelligent, 100 means something higher all the time. You'd have to adjust the IQs of generations past to today. They would be lower.
@@scientificdevil4672 you mean womankind. we all come from woman. as i described, humans are getting naturally more intelligent over time. that's how we evolve. so the brainwashing ..esp of children..has gotten more extreme. a boomer who tested at 105 in 1955 is now more like 95 today. the iq test writers must edit the tests every few years to keep the average at 100.
why is the measurement unit missing? Stanford-Binet? Cattel? Wechsler? a number without a measurement unit is NOT precise. It is like to understand if 32 degrees are a lot or not: if they are Celsius it is hot, if they are Kelving...it is VERY cold
We need to first understand that there are different kinds of intelligence. IQ tests only measure a very limited kind of intelligence, which predicts how well students will do in college fairly well, but has no relationship to how well they will do in life. Indeed, high intelligence may limit life success (depending on how you define it) if only because it tends to pidgeon-hole people. A high IQ has no necessarily correlation with self-discipline, perseverance, focus, creativity, or judgment -- all of which are equally important to success in life.
Luck, nepotism and fitting in all bear great impact upon success, you can be endowed with all the qualities you mention, but then you can encounter people's efforts to curtail you, cut you to size, over talented, too weird, too inventive, won't fit in, ad nauseum and end up a spectacular failure because of an abundance of ability and qualities. Average people tend to do better and are more successful.
Es una mezcla rara entre personas que sí le hicieron pruebas de inteligencia(smart) y otros que vivieron en otros siglos, además, de incluir de manera antojadiza, los cálculos de CI del estudio que hizo Catherine Cox en 1926. De Einstein se decía que tenía un CI de 183 en los años 70 y antes. Después se fue mejorando el test de Stanford-Binet y le bajaron a alrededor de 160-165. Fisher, el ajedrecista, tenía un punto más que él:184, con la corrección bajó a 167. A Newton que tenía 190, después le bajaron y ahora repentinamente tiene más de 200 por un capricho de admiración del que forjó esta lista. NO ES CREÍBLE ESTA LISTA, porque no dice en que se basa. Sospecho que es un cálculo "a ojo" y por simpatías y admiraciones. Nada más
Newton fue un superdotado intelectual de proporciones épicas, tenía una impresionante capacidad de asimilación de conocimiento él fue autodidacta y creo nueva ciencia su IQ incluso pudo haber sido mayor, y lo de Karl Frederick Gauss fue un portento sin igual, ya de niño demostraba su imponente inteligencia, y de adulto creo muchísima ciencia incluso se sabe que grandes matemáticos le pedían consejo y cuando ellos sacaban un nuevo teorema o algo por el estilo le enviaban a él para que lo revisara y diera el visto bueno, su coeficiente de 250 es más que acorde a su poderosísima inteligencia
If you're doing historical people -- one has to wonder where you get the data on them -- this list has to be completely bogus if you didn't include Archimedes or Euclid.
It is interesting how some people who score higher than Einstein never do anything but brag about their IQ. I wonder, do these people really sit on this kind of potential? Is the reason they're not successful that they choose not to be? I understand underachievement, but sometimes it really goes beyond that. I know people that get great results with little work. Yet equally lazy people with higher IQ scores manage to out-underachieve them. I'm starting to think Einstein, Newton, Curie, Pasteur, and others we think of as geniuses have abilities beyond IQ. If someone really has the full set of those abilities, I can't imagine they would waste them. Maybe us thinking that everyone with a high IQ scores should be a genius is like people thinking everyone tall has what it takes to be the next Michael Jordan.
No mention of John von Neumann, Enrico Fermi, Ettore Majorana, Richard Feynmann, Paul Dirac, Charles Darwin, Werner Heisenberg, Alan Turing? Seriously?
I am 13 years old but, my iq 192.3. I had imagination power when I was 3 years old. And I had logical thinking power when I was 6 years old. I hope, you will reply my comment.
Dylan Jones, listed as having an IQ of 200, never attended the “Colorado School of Medicine of Mines”, because there is no such thing. There is the Colorado School of Mines. I know this, as I have two daughters who are enrolled there. It is an engineering university, with degrees offered in many fields all the way through PhD’s. Also, Dylan Jones worked as an editor for a fashion publication.
Hope you enjoyed this video of Smartest Person in the World. Please comment here your feedback about this video and also let me know for any other topics, for which you would be interested to know the data. I will surely respond with a video for the same! Thanks for watching! 👍
Illuminati
Where is Rowan Atkinson? he is not on this list and he has the iq of about 178. also, Issac newton did not have the iq of 200, it is about 193, close though!
@@spidermotionstudios2718 yes, he does not have an iq of 205, but he has 175 iq. idk where you're getting your facts from
[edit] i just found a page online that says 160. i hope you learn your little lesson, *'do not always agree with the first thing that pops up on the internet'*
Actually Einstein's IQ is 160
How in the hell did michael get a higher iq than neil
whoever put this list together is definitely on the lower end of the scale
LMAOO
I would tend to agree... or severely misinformed
Why?
@@jacknack6819 Many of these IQ figures are "Alleged" only. Some are completely false... I saw a figure for Garry Kasparov for 190... Kasparov took a battery of tests in the 1980s.... memory... IQ... He scored 135 IQ... now much older his IQ is suddenly 190? This is bull shit.
@@fermansmith6042 iq test are different like if I was 7 and took mensa I could get a low score despite having really high test or if I take a test for 4 year olds I can easily get all them correct.
I love how einstein’s iq increased from 160 to 205, man’s solving equations in heaven
Yeah isn't that ridiculous !
😂😂
😂😂😂😂
cause why not. 😂😂😂
This is rubbish, just guesswork and prejudices
Whoever put this list together is very misinformed.
I agree
So true
whoever put this list together is definitely on the lower end of the scale
How so?
@@arrow1414 The IQ test has been proven time and time again to be a inadequate way of judging how smart someone is. Smartness isn't a messurable thing, what the IQ test really does is test how acedemically advanced someone is. Not to mention, folk have in the past lucked out on the IQ test from guessing. Even better, I call it "the" but there are too many versions of the IQ test to count.
All the IQ's listed above 200 in this video are purely estimates. It is extremely difficult to measure an IQ that high because most IQ tests don't go that high on the scale.
Exactly !
yes sir
Exactly.
@@kirbt0352 nahhhh
Actually, all the "estimates" over 200 are demonstrably BS. IQ is defined as 100 being average with a standard deviation of 15. As such, given the current population of the world, the smartest living person has an IQ of 196 BY DEFINITION.
I'd love to know how they estimated the iq of someone who's been dead for centuries amd/or who never took the test
A black man is only a basketball player but here in Africa we got young boys that make cars using scraps and they never went to school. Plz they must test them too
@@mthimkhulu30 cap
Your a very smart person, this people really think we’re all idiots
@@mello9586 you need to travel more. Your response is small and belittling.
@@robbyfiveboy4862 belittling
By what scale were these IQs computed? And how were people included who lived before such tests were proposed?
Exactly...
These are just set of subjective assumptions ....
@@vaibhavkadam1439 It should be stated clearly that this is a set of subjective assumptions. Otherwise you will get people quoting from it as though these are proven figures
@@riazhassan6570 Exactly, intelligence isn't something that can just be "assumed".
The title says it all: the author has a low IQ since he speaks about 'much' instead of 'high' IQ
200 IQ Sho Yano
achievements = has a black belt in tae kwon do
really?
He could've done it with 68 IQ too.
He must go to King Kai for training immediately!
Maybe he’s not really into doing other stuff, lol.
Nope 69.
*Black belt taekwondo masters wants to know your location*
Even goku can do it 🤣
Where is Srinivasan Ramanujan, one of the greatest mathematical prodigies the world has seen and will ever see?
They put sidis at 200 iq his iq is like 260+ 🤦♀️
math has no relation with iq
@@Ninja67745 But he was smart
@@Ninja67745 Really?
ya wtf
Nikola Tesla IQ can't possibly be 185. He was a freak of genius.
185 is already way beyond genius. And don't forget that IQ and actual intelligence don't always correlate. There are farmers with an insanely high IQ.
Tesla had over 700 patents no man or women was smarter than Genius Nikola Tesla
@@Ruzzky_Bly4t probably just the 150+ IQ eh?
tesla goes hard, and maybe your right, maybe no one has ever been smarter or even will be, but that has nothing to do with iq, and marlyn vos savant has the highest iq.
@@polite8317 Ainan Celeste Cawley (IQ score of 263)
William James Sidis (IQ score of 250-300)
Terence Tao (IQ score between 225 and 230)
Marilyn Vos Savant (IQ score of 228)
Love how einstein has 6 more IQ points then Michael Jordan lol
underrated comment
It balances out LeBron’s IQ of 77
It’s so stupid.
I thought that "William james sidis" is the smartest man on earth.
Yes
Was*
He probably is, his IQ was considered between 260-300
Yes
Yes
Newton beating Leibniz in a test that didn't exist in their time👍😅 . Btw Pythagoras scored 345
becuase of the 3 4 5 triangle.
3^2+4^2=5^2
And for real, my man Leibniz was the same level as Newton, but as a whole more well functioning.
Because it what an estimate, is was calculated by how advance they were at there time, by different subject they focused on and how far that got with it in there time of study
Albert Einstein : 205 iq?
William siddis : 200 iq?
😂
Yes I think Albert Einstein was the most intelligent person ever
Nop, albert Einstein is nearly 160-170, same as Hawking
Einstein near by 170 to 200 IQ
@@UNKNOWN.fckkkkeeeeiiiii sidis have most iq tesla has 230 iq
Ah yes, da Vinci created a time machine to take an iq test
You realise that an iq of above 200 would essentially allow you to predict exactly what will happen in the next couple minutes from one action that you make. This is BS
How is that, source?
Wrong. IQ is not a skill. It is a measure of potential. Besides that, IQ has many varieties--some score higher on math, others on spatial, verbal, whatever. Ability to predict outcomes of every action is ludicrous, or smart folk would have already solved the world's problems. By the way, what formula do you use for that weird theory? It's really baseless, unless you know something we don't. Which is very possible, of course...
I’m like 99% sure Michael Jordan does not have an IQ of 151 he just has a lot of fame and a big ego
I call bs also
You mean 154.
I would bet money that his IQ isn't that high,but his basketball IQ was off the chart.Not a hater.He is my all time favorite basketball player and the GOAT.
You think he'd be able to cultivate the Chicago Bulls to win 6 straight NBA Championships if he has that low of an IQ? LOL
@@holeephuk6972 gronk is in his 30s and caught two tds in the Super Bowl still doesn’t say anything about his intellect. MJ had a high Basketball IQ but he was 6’6’ and the most athletic person in the world. Winning rings has nothing to do with what’s on IQ tests
2:50 William Sidis has an IQ of 300, how did he become 200? Although there are many errors in the video
Between 250 to300 not 300
How is that kid considered the smartest???
@@briishman8866 I mean he isn’t the smartest he just has a high iq
@@briishman8866 yeah he was really smart by age 6 he mastered 6 languages
@Stephen Vergopoulos I do not think so
My IQ is 162 and I’m a complete failure in human relationships.
My iq is 138 and i have problems too with relationships
Most of us are.
big brain
Ok sure kid i didn't see u in the vid
Haaà ! Failure is a point of view.... I came " THIS CLOSE " to getting married twice , and if I ever see either of those women again.... I'll THANK THEM from the bottom of my heart ! Haaà..
Jesus imagine guessing the IQ according to achievement you casual.
@Toby Bowden preach
How is it possible that Galileo Galilei has that IQ? He lived many years ago, human intelligence advances and no matter how intelligent he was, he does not compare to today.
something is wrong on this video.
When Einstein was asked what it was like to be a genius, he replied: Ask Tesla.
What he actually said was - why don't you ask Sir Isaac Newton.
Stop watching conspiracy theory videos. Tesla was an apprentice electrician working for Westinghouse.
@@scientificdevil4672 LOL, someone is in the wrong place...
@@scientificdevil4672 Tesla is somewhat overrated by conspiracy freaks but even so he was quite intelligent and made some valuable contributions to electrical power generation.
And when Tesla was asked if this was true, he relied: Ask James Maxwell
@@joeschembrie9450 Average iq is 100... No wonder conspiracies are successful.
You have teletubies saying Tesla is OVERRATED lmao... He literally plugged a lightbulb into the ground and it light up. He had thousands of inventions that were seized by the very same evil people that kidnap your children to this day, again, because you have iq of 100
He missed Mr Bean
Tesla's IQ is ruled out to be 185. He was already using radio controls and fluorescents when Edison was struggling to create the carbon fiber light bulb. He has several inventions that science, even 100 years later, cannot explain. And he used them and proved that he was not a fraud. I think he's the smartest human being of all time.
What did Tesla create sides the thing for the Frankenstein movies?
agreed indeed.
@@paladin4141 Human Duplication Machine
He was the smartest human being of all time (unless he was an Alien, which is possible)
Abe fake video
Scientists Nikola Tesla was one of the great all time
William james has the most iq blw 250 to 350
He made his own language when he was 9
He know 8 language when he was 8 year old
Nikola Tesla
Has iq blw180 to 310
Everyone believe he has 310 iq einstin said that Nikola Tesla is the smart man on planet
Aristotle is the number one. He thought about things we recently have discovered.
You've got all these super geniuses, but none can figure out the pyramids, Stonehenge, Nazca Lines, cold fusion, cure for cancer, etc.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😋
There are so many errors here.
Tyson's IQ is 160; he went to the Bronxc H.S. of Science where the average IQ is 135. Hawking 160. Leonardo, 207. Worst of all is Sidis. He is considered the highest at 300!
Fischer, 187.
Fischer's 187 IQ was "Alleged".... as is Garry Kasparov and Magnus Carlsen's 190 IQs
Standard IQ test scoring maxes out 200. Anyone claiming higher is most likely making it up. Or they're using a non-standard system in which case the number is meaningless without knowing the scale and standard distribution of the test they took. I have a cousing that could get 300 on a test that goes to 800 with an typical result of 400. And I'd score about 600-620.
@@kaseyboles30 Interesting. Never have I heard of such before ! :-)
Your answer is a bit ambiguous. Are you saying Tyson actually has an IQ of 160 rather than the "quoted" or "alleged" 123? I have heard about a score of 160 for Hawking ..however, was that on the Cattell ( sp) scale, where around 161 equates to 132 on the Stanford Binet? Of course Leonard da Vinci has to be an "estimate" only. Sidis.. was incredible but his IQ an estimate also.
@@kaseyboles30 That is incorrect. It is pretty much impossible to measure IQs higher than 150. On top of that, the US American "scale" is very inflated and the testing is done differently than in Europe. Most US claims of 160+ and such nonsense barely make 140 in the EU calibration.
How many folks realize IQs neither measure "how smart one is" nor do they portend a person's impact on the world stage. IQs basically reflect a person's capability/potential for mental significance. My last IQ number came up at 175...and believe me, I'm no mental giant or life-long over-achiever! After all, how many can truly describe themselves as "a stable genius?"
Most of the people above Einstein: yeah, no.
Where are their great achievements up there with the Theory of Relativity?? Accomplishments should be the sole determiner of intelligence, not the ability to memorize and repeat verbatim.
@@johnsulvarta4837 Cumulative intelligence should be measured after a person dies based on sheer scientific or academic accomplishments. I think being able to take tests well or having an eidetic memory belies true, groundbreaking intelligence like Einstein possessed.
@@johnsulvarta4837 You are telling him to stfu? Really? You can’t just make up your own definition of intelligence, intelligence is your brain power, you can know everything in the world but when it comes to a life or death situation the more intelligent person is likely to servive because they can problem sole better and faster.
Look at a computer. The cpu is the brain of a computer, the cache and hard drive are the computers short and long term knowledge, whereas the clock determines the speed, and the alu determines how calculations are performed. Your intelligence is your cpu, a better cpu means you are much smarter and faster, it doesn’t matter how big your hard drive is.
Intelligence has two definitions, one is the gathering of intel, but it only means that in a military or defence point of view. The other is the biological definition, I suggest you listen to this guy and actually do some research.
There is a word called ‘ignorant’ it doesn’t mean you are stupid, it means you are without knowledge in a particular felid, you are ignorant.
@@user-uq1fq6gs3i there’s multiple definitions of intelligence, that one you’re using is the most popular , but it’s more useful to distinguish intelligence from smarts , what’s your word for someone who knows a lot about a lot of things
Oh pardon it seems as thought I had my words mixed up , my apologies
@@johnsulvarta4837 Someone that knows a lot is knowledgable, clear, smart. We sometimes say they are intelligent (this is okay is normal everyday language but in terms of Biology and iq it is factually incorrect). For example in everyday language people say ‘oh I’m going to weigh myself on the scales’ however you don’t measure weight on scales, you measure mass because weight is a force in Newton’s.
What’s my point? My point is that people use words interchangeably in everyday language but that doesn’t mean they are technically right. I might call a knowledgeable person intelligent but that doesn’t mean that their fluid intelligence is actually that good.
By your definition I am more intelligent than Einstein (and I can guarantee you I am not) because I am much more knowledgable, I’m being serious, I factually know a lot more than Einstein ever did because I have more and better qualifications. I have a Masters in mathematics and a phd in mathematical sciences, I am also now studying for a bachelors in computer science (which is why I used the computer analogy in the last comment haha). But I am not as intelligent as Einstein, I know more but he had a great way of thinking, and therefore could achieve greater things.
Fluid intelligence and crystallized intelligence are different things, you are thinking of crystallized intelligence, which is classified as a type of intelligence but not in the same sense as iq, real biological intelligence refers to fluid intelligence.
crystallized intelligence is accumulating knowledge,
Fluid intelligence is your way of thinking (this is more commonly used as a measure of real intelligence)
My understanding was that William James Sidis had an IQ estimated between 300 and 350, and was regarded as the smartest human to have yet lived.
He was close to 300 not over.
275-300, not over 300.
It was 250-300.
Note: if a person tells you someone has an IQ over 195, they are wrong. It's a fact that they're wrong. There's only enough people in the world to "cover" 197 IQ, as far as I remember.
@@Termenz1 From my understanding, those limits are based on probabilities, and so would be considered extremely unlikely, but not impossible. Keep in mind that each generation is building upon the technological and scientific advancement of the previous one, thus the greatest minds of the new generations are being exposed to a greater understanding of how systems work, thus those neural pathways would see a subtle, steady increase generationally, making a slightly higher maximum IQ more plausible.
Not even one mention for the guy that invented the wheel? Pretty sure he is in the top 5.
SORRY...it was a woman who invented the wheel...her name was AYLA:)
@@maureenvincent4414 source of this info?
@@batmanismanas her imagination
@@maureenvincent4414 I am just curious about the info. I don't mean to put forward any agenda
Usually it's known names from history are mentioned and not prehistoric unknown s .
There was a research paper posted online about two years ago written by a high-profile psychological research group in which they said that it's very difficult to measure an IQ that is over 140. As I recall, their consensus was that most IQ's that are very much over 140 are erroneous numbers and that the most likely scenario is that those extremely high IQ's are actually somewhere around 140.
William James Sidis had an IQ of 275. Einstein's was lesser than 200. This is wrong stats I am afraid.
einstein had 180 iq
I agree.Where did they get their information from?
Had many genius friends throughout my life, every one was a social failure and couldn't survive a weekend camping trip.
@@MAILER-DAEMON nah, member of the Justice League and part time copywriter for Mensa.
The difference between book smarts and “horse” smarts as my grandpa use to say.
So far as I know, william james sidis's IQ is 260 or more. And Albert einstein 's is 160.
260 is kind of hard to get on a 0-200 scale (Impossible actually). Einstein scored 162 and 164 on two different tests IIRC.
@@kaseyboles30 There's no cap on an IQ scale, neither in theory nor in practice.
@@BringBackNormal you cannot get more questions right than a test has.
Einstein incorrect scores
Nikola Tesla is the smartest man to ever exist
Baloney...next to DaVinci he was far from being as influential and prolific. He died poor, a bad businessman.
Nikola Tesla has the highest in this list he's close to his dreams that we are dreaming today...
William sidis is the most intelligent person in the history
That is true but William doesn't care he likes to spend times in loneliness
ung yong kim is the smartest. He mathematically completed the kinetic energy of planets and spaceships in NASA.
NASA claim that Armstrong went to the moon but it was a lie. So it could be a lie again
IQ test invented in 1904. Shakespear lived 400 years before.
What they do is assume an IQ based upon their achievements and other factors like observational and making interconnections, all these can only be educated guesswork.
If that's true then why isn't Isaac Newton at the top of the list?
Isn't it impossible to get over 200 IQ
If The standard deviation SD=15 then If we Have 2 billion people The smartest is 193IQ If we using SD=24 then we get 248,8IQ The Singapore Kid scored The world Record IQ points 263IQ That IS a joke! The Best chess computer programs play chess 229IQ level and These computers Beat the world champion Magnus Carlsen 99-1 If this Singapore Kid Beat The Best chess computer programs and compose 200 Symphonies and cure for cancer! BUT nothing They can do! Savant and Langan 200IQ points No Big things from These Two! Nothing can they do These 200IQ people! The real smart people Are Andrew Wiles solved Fermat last theorem! Grigory Perlman solved Poincare conjecture! Grigory Sokolov playing Brahms piano concerto no 2 With The Finnish Radio Symphony Orchestra from 1996 video TH-cam! Grigory Sokolov might Be The only one really over 200IQ points level!!
No
When Einstein was ask how it felt to be the smartest man on the planet, he replied "I don't know, you'll have to ask Nikola Tesla".
This list is a joke.
In this list you guys forgot to mention Shuborno Isaac Bari, youngest professor in this world for his advanced IQ.
Though the same!
What about mathematician srinivasa ramanujan
I have 75 IQ, and I’m not a smartest person. I have mild intellectual disability and there is no cure.
Hmmmm but the history says that william sidis is the most smartest man in the history and had an IQ of 260?
You forgot Edmund Kemper which is estimated between 136 and 145
Grigori Perelman should be included in that list. Easily. He is probably the alive person with highest IQ
Yall miss the point, Albert Einstien with 160iq achieved something that someone with 300 couldn't. Please understand Iq isn't everything. I'm not just saying this because I am terrible, it's because I only have an iq of 155.
And, I'm in grade 8 doing undergraduate math problems with my tutor. So please don't be discouraged.
Hmm I cannot touch this one... if you are a kid , will not assume the "ATTACK mode" but most of what you have said it is correct. 155 IQ is very high depending on what scale is used.
Bobby Fischer 180 IQ. That used to be his records in his biographies.😂
Bobby Fischer against Boris Spassky 17 wins 11 losses! Magnus Carlsen would Beat The Prime Boris Spassky easily 6 wins 6 draws no loss! My old computer tought 5:22 minutes Capablanca-Reti game move! Same computer tought 4:37 Kasparov-Kramnik game move! Capablanca better than Kasparov! Capablanca would Beat The Prime Boris Spassky easily 8 wins 5 draws no loss! Boris Spassky was The weakest chess world champion Ever!!
@@RaineriHakkarainen Russian guys used to play like mafia guys.
A massive team of con men trying to sell to the world an ugly ideology.
There was no fair play in those cold war times.
@@simonscardino4135 Fischer against Boris Spassky 17 wins 11 losses! Fischer Beat Taimanov 6-0 Taimanov was The classical pianist! Taimanov played The piano! Fischer tought chess 98% of his Time 15 hours a day! Poor Taimanov played The piano
@@RaineriHakkarainen Chess is like life..!
Bobby: Chess is life..!
😎😎😎
Where is professor soborno Isaac Bari? Why you didn't add his name in this list?
1:43 185 is wrong his iq was estimated to be at most 310 google it and it was estimated because he never took the test which would make him the worlds smartest man eat that Edison 🤣🇷🇸💪🧠⚡️
William James Sidis IQ's 250-300 .
Im absolutely happy and amazed by your research
☺
But your research has gone wrong in some place
There is someone named William James Sidis who is estimated to have an IQ of 275. He was the smartest person to ever exist.
And he invented what?
@@joeschembrie9450 he had a sad life story, u can watch it on youtube and u can also find out what he invented from TH-cam cause I forgot
he was on here, but only at 200. he should be number one by a long shot. person who made this didnt do it well.
How IQ is calculated for personalities who are no more now.
They look at the skills that they have
or how they solve some problems and also they even look at what age did they learn to walk, read, calculate etc.
There is no way Michael Jordan is 154 and Netanyahu 180. Jordan is no higher than 125 and Netanyahu no higher than 140. This video is exaggerated.
And for sure no way that yours is higher than 85, see how that works?
@@mbrownie22 65 actually
King Solomon, is the smartest man on earth.
@Klaus Hermann he is
Where is Shrinivas ramanujan
Nice video bruh!
Thanks for Watching!👍
I think you forgot William James Sidis who have 275iq
Every channel has different datas
So
IQ would be a fake thing
Who wait for ramanusan sir😢
The only people who should be on the list are those who proved without doubt they enhanced scientific fields, like Einstein, Hawking, Galilei, Euler, Leibniz, Young, Tesla, Clausis, Newton, Copernicus, Maxwell, da Vinci, and Gauss. All others may appear smart without being that smart. There are probably a lot more who are missing, like Euclid, Pythagoras, Heron of Alexandria, Archimedes, Fibonacci, Descartes, Kepler, Volta, a lot many more.
IQ only measures a certain realm of cognition. It's not a "worthwhile scientific achievement" test.
Aren't we missing " Person, woman, man, camera, TV" in here ? 🤔
100 gets lower every generation because that value was assigned to represent the average. So as we evolve and become more intelligent, 100 means something higher all the time. You'd have to adjust the IQs of generations past to today. They would be lower.
so you mean women are smarter than men?
Mankind is dumbing down at an alarming rate. People don't think for themselves.
@@scientificdevil4672 you mean womankind. we all come from woman.
as i described, humans are getting naturally more intelligent over time. that's how we evolve. so the brainwashing ..esp of children..has gotten more extreme.
a boomer who tested at 105 in 1955 is now more like 95 today. the iq test writers must edit the tests every few years to keep the average at 100.
Animals are the smartest they don’t make comparisons because everyone is unique in their own way👍
3:40 K Visalini , Girl from tirunelveli , south india
why is the measurement unit missing? Stanford-Binet? Cattel? Wechsler? a number without a measurement unit is NOT precise. It is like to understand if 32 degrees are a lot or not: if they are Celsius it is hot, if they are Kelving...it is VERY cold
We need to first understand that there are different kinds of intelligence. IQ tests only measure a very limited kind of intelligence, which predicts how well students will do in college fairly well, but has no relationship to how well they will do in life. Indeed, high intelligence may limit life success (depending on how you define it) if only because it tends to pidgeon-hole people. A high IQ has no necessarily correlation with self-discipline, perseverance, focus, creativity, or judgment -- all of which are equally important to success in life.
Luck, nepotism and fitting in all bear great impact upon success, you can be endowed with all the qualities you mention, but then you can encounter people's efforts to curtail you, cut you to size, over talented, too weird, too inventive, won't fit in, ad nauseum and end up a spectacular failure because of an abundance of ability and qualities. Average people tend to do better and are more successful.
No, many are wrong seriously. Elon Musk 155 IQ where? Einstein IQ 160-180 not 205, Williams James Sidis 250-300 IQ Smartest human ever.
Willian had the bigger IQ number of the history... it was not 200 hahaha
1 thing I wanna say to these young geniuses is - " did u remember when u last enjoyed your life or taken a happy break" !
I've read and followed Judit polgar
She seems pretty happy women
Creator: William James Sidis IQ=200
Me: 🔫😑 I just want to talk with him
Having high IQ is not the same as beeing smart or having wisdom ..
True. IQ is mostly about memory capacity and certain aptitudes like spacial comprehension, verbal fluency, etc.
Ok. Unrelated to the video at hand. Go to a philosophy video.
Es una mezcla rara entre personas que sí le hicieron pruebas de inteligencia(smart) y otros que vivieron en otros siglos, además, de incluir de manera antojadiza, los cálculos de CI del estudio que hizo Catherine Cox en 1926. De Einstein se decía que tenía un CI de 183 en los años 70 y antes. Después se fue mejorando el test de Stanford-Binet y le bajaron a alrededor de 160-165. Fisher, el ajedrecista, tenía un punto más que él:184, con la corrección bajó a 167. A Newton que tenía 190, después le bajaron y ahora repentinamente tiene más de 200 por un capricho de admiración del que forjó esta lista. NO ES CREÍBLE ESTA LISTA, porque no dice en que se basa. Sospecho que es un cálculo "a ojo" y por simpatías y admiraciones. Nada más
Newton fue un superdotado intelectual de proporciones épicas, tenía una impresionante capacidad de asimilación de conocimiento él fue autodidacta y creo nueva ciencia su IQ incluso pudo haber sido mayor, y lo de Karl Frederick Gauss fue un portento sin igual, ya de niño demostraba su imponente inteligencia, y de adulto creo muchísima ciencia incluso se sabe que grandes matemáticos le pedían consejo y cuando ellos sacaban un nuevo teorema o algo por el estilo le enviaban a él para que lo revisara y diera el visto bueno, su coeficiente de 250 es más que acorde a su poderosísima inteligencia
If you're doing historical people -- one has to wonder where you get the data on them -- this list has to be completely bogus if you didn't include Archimedes or Euclid.
Tesla with 160 - 310 hold my beer 😂
It is interesting how some people who score higher than Einstein never do anything but brag about their IQ.
I wonder, do these people really sit on this kind of potential? Is the reason they're not successful that they choose not to be?
I understand underachievement, but sometimes it really goes beyond that. I know people that get great results with little work. Yet equally lazy people with higher IQ scores manage to out-underachieve them.
I'm starting to think Einstein, Newton, Curie, Pasteur, and others we think of as geniuses have abilities beyond IQ. If someone really has the full set of those abilities, I can't imagine they would waste them.
Maybe us thinking that everyone with a high IQ scores should be a genius is like people thinking everyone tall has what it takes to be the next Michael Jordan.
Einstein had to have had an iq of at least 190 - he’s so underrated.
Einsteins estimated iq was 160
I believe his type of intelligence is rare, I also master physics but my IQ can't go higher then130.
William. J Sidus was the smartest person in history.
Imagine all of that people correct the E=mc²
Nikola Tesla is only 185, and Garry kasprov, Carlsen's iq lv is ~190. How can they beat Tesla. IMPOSSIBLE !
FOR A KNOWLEDGE TESLA IQ WAS MORE THAN 280 AND HE IS RECOGNISED MOST BRILLIANT MAN ON EARTH EVEN ALBERT EINSTEIN SAID THIS
I dissagree
Where is Alan Turing, John Nash and Ramanujan in the list?
How habibie ?
Actually based on Google
William Sidis have 250 to 300 iq.
Well I'm not sure if it's true..
How they calculated iq for galileo
*no matter how good you think you are, there’s always that Asian kid*
No mention of John von Neumann, Enrico Fermi, Ettore Majorana, Richard Feynmann, Paul Dirac, Charles Darwin, Werner Heisenberg, Alan Turing? Seriously?
well do some research, you forgot about the beast, willam james sidis
How this iq test is taken
I’m sure some of this is extremely inaccurate. But is nice to know just how human they all still are/were.
I am 13 years old but, my iq 192.3. I had imagination power when I was 3 years old. And I had logical thinking power when I was 6 years old. I hope, you will reply my comment.
I am not amaze that None of any Flat earther people will found in this list.
Dylan Jones, listed as having an IQ of 200, never attended the “Colorado School of Medicine of Mines”, because there is no such thing. There is the Colorado School of Mines. I know this, as I have two daughters who are enrolled there. It is an engineering university, with degrees offered in many fields all the way through PhD’s. Also, Dylan Jones worked as an editor for a fashion publication.
While I would love to believe I’m smarter than Neil deGrasse Tyson, there is just no way in hell he’s only a 123.
your list is wrong,you probably did not heard of S. ramanujan