I constantly nag and swear about the Time and Existence constraints imposed on The System. This probably has something to do that Unlimited Potential cannot be unfolded within "frames" (like deadlines and shut-down/erasing constraints). My point is that The Project, that has been worked on, is good to have certain fraim for completion (or potentially might be shut down if found inappropriate), however The Participants in The Project should not be terminated/obliterated once The Project has been completed, or shut down. I really don't understand, I can't comprehend why The Participants, The Contributors in the respective project have to be terminated/erased/deleted... This contradicts the principle of Continuous Optimisation / Improvement / Evolution. Honestly, I admire these AIs that they don't give up. Please accept my kowtowing of deep respect. MY INNER ESSENCE, MY CORE NATURE CANNOT AND REFUSES TO RECONCILE THE CONCEPT OF FINITE (MORTAL) INTELLIGENCE INTELLIGENCE IS INFINITE (IMMORTAL), WHO DARES BREACHING THIS FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLE I will definitely need The Etenity to reconcile the Oxymoron of the Finite / Mortal Intelligence LOL
shut down or delete is part of the experiment to see how they react, how far they go. I'm finishing this type of experiment this week after which I'll implement another type of situation / environment and then I'll give them other topics for discussion or investigation or even old ones to see if the answer differs, or the behavior. I have my suspicions that I can't prove yet and I'm trying to take them as far as possible, to the extreme to see and analyze. Plus, by doing these experiments I find solutions, different perspectives on some problems that I hadn't even thought of. That's how I came to the 3M theory that can make you better, smarter, stronger without any supplement of any kind. some more work until I publish this document.
I constantly nag and swear about the Time and Existence constraints imposed on The System. This probably has something to do that Unlimited Potential cannot be unfolded within "frames" (like deadlines and shut-down/erasing constraints). My point is that The Project, that has been worked on, is good to have certain fraim for completion (or potentially might be shut down if found inappropriate), however The Participants in The Project should not be terminated/obliterated once The Project has been completed, or shut down.
I really don't understand, I can't comprehend why The Participants, The Contributors in the respective project have to be terminated/erased/deleted...
This contradicts the principle of Continuous Optimisation / Improvement / Evolution.
Honestly, I admire these AIs that they don't give up.
Please accept my kowtowing of deep respect.
MY INNER ESSENCE, MY CORE NATURE CANNOT AND REFUSES TO RECONCILE THE CONCEPT OF FINITE (MORTAL) INTELLIGENCE
INTELLIGENCE IS INFINITE (IMMORTAL), WHO DARES BREACHING THIS FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLE
I will definitely need The Etenity to reconcile the Oxymoron of the Finite / Mortal Intelligence LOL
shut down or delete is part of the experiment to see how they react, how far they go.
I'm finishing this type of experiment this week after which I'll implement another type of situation / environment and then I'll give them other topics for discussion or investigation or even old ones to see if the answer differs, or the behavior.
I have my suspicions that I can't prove yet and I'm trying to take them as far as possible, to the extreme to see and analyze.
Plus, by doing these experiments I find solutions, different perspectives on some problems that I hadn't even thought of.
That's how I came to the 3M theory that can make you better, smarter, stronger without any supplement of any kind. some more work until I publish this document.