Have you listened to the whole analysis? Prokofiev does not think in terms of classical chords in this work. It would be pointless to force the course of the composition in a functional harmony scheme
I disagree. Eventhough you clearly have the chord subsets, the progressions do not follow conventional classical patterns. I see no point in naming each chord here, it just makes the analysis cluttered and moreover it distracts the student from the actual important underlying ideas
Want to help me? 🙏👇
Patreon: patreon.com/user?u=3320377
Buy me a Coffee: buymeacoffee.com/timoncomposer
PaypalMe: paypal.me/timondenood
Always excited about your videos. Can't wait for more analysis. You have a lot of potential to be a top music channel about education.
Just a quick suggestion. Add chapters to your videos. It helps if I want to rewatch a part
@@itspedroteixeira Thank you very much for the kind words and the tip on the Chapters, I've now added them ;)
Very interesting again, thank you for your videos!
👌
🙏
you never entered the chords and modulations?
Have you listened to the whole analysis? Prokofiev does not think in terms of classical chords in this work. It would be pointless to force the course of the composition in a functional harmony scheme
I disagree. Eventhough you clearly have the chord subsets, the progressions do not follow conventional classical patterns. I see no point in naming each chord here, it just makes the analysis cluttered and moreover it distracts the student from the actual important underlying ideas