The Civil Rights Act Of 1964 Explained | This Day Forward | msnbc

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 155

  • @international128
    @international128 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Good men.

  • @chaddisrud535
    @chaddisrud535 8 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Does the fed definition of public accommodation go beyond hotels/restaurants/theaters/businesses that affect commerce (commerce as defined in 42 U.S.C. 12181)? It seems that it only applies to places that are primarily involved in interstate commerce and that small companies or even small hotels are exempt. As 42 U.S.C. defines "commerce", wouldn't it's narrow definition be the only acceptable one applicable to this code? If you know of some other U.S.C. which rescinds this or redefines "public accommodation" or "commerce" more broadly, please comment. Thanks

    • @susu-mi7kx
      @susu-mi7kx 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Time for another Amendment

    • @chaddisrud535
      @chaddisrud535 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@susu-mi7kx I'm glad it limits what is "public", because, without that there wouldn't be anything which is fundamentally private.

    • @drstone1167
      @drstone1167 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      🆘 Crazy nervous Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, Joe Biden and the Democrats want to rig future elections and here’s what democrats are trying to do.
      ❌ CANCEL voter ID
      ❌ Legalize ballot harvesting
      ❌ Grant universal mail-in voting
      ❌ Allow illegals to vote
      ❌ Empower a federal takeover of all elections
      If Democrats can’t cheat at elections they can‘t win so they want the rules changed so they can. Pathetic !

    • @drstone1167
      @drstone1167 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@chaddisrud535 🆘 Crazy nervous Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, Joe Biden and the Democrats want to rig future elections and here’s what democrats are trying to do.
      ❌ CANCEL voter ID
      ❌ Legalize ballot harvesting
      ❌ Grant universal mail-in voting
      ❌ Allow illegals to vote
      ❌ Empower a federal takeover of all elections
      If Democrats can’t cheat at elections they can‘t win so they want the rules changed so they can. Pathetic !

    • @chaddisrud535
      @chaddisrud535 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@drstone1167 left wing or right wing, the vast majority of politicians and the US federal government are from the same treasonous bird

  • @pyrosapien4028
    @pyrosapien4028 3 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    "It restricts no ones freedom, so long as he respects the rights of other"
    Well that was a lie

    • @julianG1212
      @julianG1212 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah for the first 5-10 years

    • @mrsantoro8306
      @mrsantoro8306 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      No they cause all their problems themselves then blame it on racism. It’s easy to blame someone else for your actions.

  • @adriancarty612
    @adriancarty612 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Democrats opposed the bill

    • @goodoboy505
      @goodoboy505 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Democrats then are Republicans now.

    • @ryukaganzeroful
      @ryukaganzeroful 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Absolutely false. Both civil rights act were fought against by (technically) Republicans. I'm not a Democrat. I fall center right on the political spectrum. You're spreading misinformation to further your own narrative against democrats.
      The democrats of the south at the time were largely far right by today's standards, and even in their own time they were much more right leaning than Northern democrats. I'm sure I don't need to explain why there might have been a political bias in the south vs northern states at this time in history.
      If you want to discredit historically democratic motives and movements you're going about it the wrong way.

    • @KingBranBDM
      @KingBranBDM 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And they all became Republicans afterwards.

    • @Michael_B82
      @Michael_B82 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The party’s are not the same as they were in 1964 stop the gaslighting

    • @MattQuinlan-cx4vs
      @MattQuinlan-cx4vs 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Michael_B82
      Democrat Senator/KKK member Robert Byrd, died while Obama was in office.
      Joe Biden gave the eulogy on TV and Hillary said he was a great mentor.
      I suggest you stop the gaslighting.

  • @blanenoel4231
    @blanenoel4231 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Say my name! Reddit say it ! The son of Mary! Noel!

  • @jovaraszigmantas
    @jovaraszigmantas 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    damm right brother

    • @AnthonyJohnson-rd1rd
      @AnthonyJohnson-rd1rd 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What do you think about the civil rights act

  • @mai-lovebeautiful9746
    @mai-lovebeautiful9746 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I made comments under Mai-love Beautiful different email but someone changed it or deleted it. Please note I would not make offensive or insulting comments.
    1763- the line of proclamation
    1863- Abraham Lincoln's emancipation proclamation speech.
    1963- JFK civil rights speech.
    2063-??? Civil life. You have a right to not get shot or make higher than minimum wage.

  • @rentslave
    @rentslave 6 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    We need a Civil Responsibilities Act!

  • @smokey4166
    @smokey4166 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    No

  • @vetteds
    @vetteds 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    yay

  • @davidross6179
    @davidross6179 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Republicans got this bill voted in!
    But democrats took 100% of the credit.

    • @carolmosher7745
      @carolmosher7745 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      A Democrat President sign the bill into law.

    • @davidross6179
      @davidross6179 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@carolmosher7745 yeah after congress and senators did thier jobs

    • @boynextdoor3093
      @boynextdoor3093 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@davidross6179 No, you're just wrong. Goldwater was a republican, he was the republican nominee in 1964, and he wanted to repeal the civil rights act. The republicans who voted in favour of that act were liberals and moderates. The democrats who voted against it were conservatives. Party names are meaningless, ideology is what counts.

  • @scottsullivan234
    @scottsullivan234 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I wonder, before the CRA of 1964, did most places ban blacks?
    I mean, could blacks attend a Chinese restaurant or did they go along with segregation also? Did it offend their white clients to have blacks dinning next to them?
    Were they allowed on government property, like public beaches? In old black and white photos, I don't see any blacks at beaches.

    • @KingBranBDM
      @KingBranBDM 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Black People predominantly in the south were only allowed to attend such establishments on certain days of the week. But they were not allow to be amongst white people or feel that they were at anyway equal to White Society.

    • @emmanuelmacharia3589
      @emmanuelmacharia3589 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You can easily get this information if you want it. There's a plethora of documentaries and all kinds of books on it. There was TV and Cameras so it's a pretty well recorded time period.

    • @kelsopoolie
      @kelsopoolie 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@emmanuelmacharia3589
      Why not just answer the question?

    • @emmanuelmacharia3589
      @emmanuelmacharia3589 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@kelsopoolie Because it's a very loaded question and it took me days of research to answer this question. I refuse to spend a minute of my life answering a question whose answer freely floats all over the internet

    • @kelsopoolie
      @kelsopoolie 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@emmanuelmacharia3589 Listen to yourself:
      It takes days to find this information? That would make sense why the guy would ask a question in a comment section designed for the community to discuss this topic at hand, rather than spend days searching for the info.
      You wouldn’t spend a minute passing on information? The person wasn’t even asking you. And yet here you are, taking several minutes out of your day just to look like a fool. He didn’t ask you specifically. You could’ve just scrolled past.

  • @eugene44569
    @eugene44569 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    who is here becasue of george floyd?

    • @bunny1308
      @bunny1308 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      i’m here because my history teacher said so :)

    • @star-and-cute
      @star-and-cute 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@bunny1308 same

  • @daveyork0
    @daveyork0 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    How awesome that racism was only a thing before LBJ had JFK capped!

    • @austino5076
      @austino5076 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      No proof he did that

    • @poloblack7408
      @poloblack7408 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Racism was always a thing

    • @sluggo5260
      @sluggo5260 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      daveyork)....he was definitely in on it, as was the Secret Service, as can be seen when reviewing the Dallas tapes and seeing the Secret Service agents being ordered off of JFKs limousine riding perches just before it turned the corner and came into firing range of "the shady knoll" where numerous witnesses swore the shots came from. The shekel is a powerful weapon for deceit.

    • @KingBranBDM
      @KingBranBDM 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nope it was Deep than Deep Ellum. Deeper than Dallas. Remember that you had a Vietnam War going on. The war was more important than upstart Civil Rights Politics. The war was part of the Cold War which was a war against Communism. JFK's enemies won America 20 years after his death.

  • @VincentJones-l3j
    @VincentJones-l3j 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

    This bill help all of us including white women

  • @rah-mown6392
    @rah-mown6392 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    The downfall of America.

    • @AnythingLounge
      @AnythingLounge 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Hey bro just because you're white doesn't mean you have to be a racist piece of s*** I mean I know your parents raised you to be that way and you don't like black people having equal rights you nasty disgusting human being but you need to at least have a little respect

    • @nasirreese766
      @nasirreese766 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@AnythingLounge You are a product of this very bill, this bill was created and intended for the "black cv leaders" to sell black americans to the democratic party in exchange the black americans got ebt, affirmative action, etc so that they would vote Democrat for the next 200 years, its only been 69 years or so

    • @Leegendari
      @Leegendari 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      How

    • @haatpraat2993
      @haatpraat2993 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Your just lamenting a kick in the face against white racism.

    • @juanchoresultay2704
      @juanchoresultay2704 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      For White americans who opposed this law 😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • @bwisdom4484
    @bwisdom4484 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    they should a did one for the other colors too who were in poverty. this did divide. because there were and still are wealth family's of all color lol what a funny joke

    • @Nada07able
      @Nada07able 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      The same bill is for them too.

    • @owengordon175
      @owengordon175 4 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      This bill wasn't just for black people. All minority groups as defined by race are included.

    • @kadokang4479
      @kadokang4479 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      B wisdom has no wisdom. Please fill us in on the other folks you are speaking of?

    • @AnythingLounge
      @AnythingLounge 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      This comment section is full of dead brain angry trolls please take down your name B Wisdom because you'll never have wisdom talking like that

    • @KingBranBDM
      @KingBranBDM 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Bwisdom you know nothing about Segregation in the South and wealth meant nothing at the time. You know nothing about the racial restrictions in the North like Redlining. It's literally a lot that you either did not know when you wrote this or still do not know today.

  • @mmtoss6530
    @mmtoss6530 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The Civil Rights act summarized in a word: Draconian

    • @evelynzlon9492
      @evelynzlon9492 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      We still haven't learned that employment rights and access to wealth are 2 different things entirely. There are other more important components to one's net worth besides employment income. Slavery is a job. Sharecropping was a job. Yet like Charlie Brown taking another kick at Lucy's football, we are enchanted by the egalitarian wording of the Civil Rights Act. We eat it right up, all of us.

    • @evelynzlon9492
      @evelynzlon9492 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I do know one black genius college professor whose 2 daughters graduated from Harvard. He turned a quick buck after the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was enacted, and purchased a large tract of rural land as fast as he could. Remember that the US government originally reneged on 40 acres and a mule. This black genius well knew that the US government was still his enemy, so he deemed America's DISCARDED racial policies to be more valuable than the ACTIVE ones. Like Danny Glover in the Color Purple, he intentionally did the exact opposite of the government's recommendations. As soon as he could. Perhaps he couldn't pinpoint exactly WHY this was important, but he knew it WAS.
      As it turns out, it was important...

  • @morbidlyoppressed9038
    @morbidlyoppressed9038 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    2020 : 1 person =multiple votes

    • @randibgood
      @randibgood 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      That's the REPUBLICON way!

    • @MattQuinlan-cx4vs
      @MattQuinlan-cx4vs 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@randibgood2024 5 Democrats on their way to Prison for stuffing ballot boxes on surveillance videos. 😂