I have seen tutorials before for running processes with GeoPandas but definitely your teaching has been quite useful to better understand how the language works. I feel like I'm in a real classroom. Thank you, professor.
Dr. Wu, Thank you so much. I really appreciate your tutorials on TH-cam. I am eager for detailed sessions on Geopandas (or other packages) on your TH-cam channel to learn additional editing, such as working with multiple shapefiles, selecting by attributes or filtering using queries, clipping extents, spatial join, layouts with map elements, etc. I am looking for a complete alternative to desktop mapping software to do everything in Python.
Thank you so much for taking the time to share your knowledge with us. Your teaching has been incredibly helpful for my personal studies and self-development. I have a few questions based on today’s lesson: I was previously under the impression from my geospatial classes that WGS 1984 is the ideal projection to use. However, I learned something new today that made me reconsider. Would you recommend always choosing a projection specific to the area we are working on when conducting geospatial analysis? Or is using WGS 1984 still sufficient for accurate results? Thank you again, sir!
I have seen tutorials before for running processes with GeoPandas but definitely your teaching has been quite useful to better understand how the language works. I feel like I'm in a real classroom. Thank you, professor.
Thank you for the kind words
Dr. Wu, Thank you so much. I really appreciate your tutorials on TH-cam. I am eager for detailed sessions on Geopandas (or other packages) on your TH-cam channel to learn additional editing, such as working with multiple shapefiles, selecting by attributes or filtering using queries, clipping extents, spatial join, layouts with map elements, etc. I am looking for a complete alternative to desktop mapping software to do everything in Python.
Thanks a lot again🌼
Thank you so much for taking the time to share your knowledge with us. Your teaching has been incredibly helpful for my personal studies and self-development. I have a few questions based on today’s lesson:
I was previously under the impression from my geospatial classes that WGS 1984 is the ideal projection to use. However, I learned something new today that made me reconsider. Would you recommend always choosing a projection specific to the area we are working on when conducting geospatial analysis? Or is using WGS 1984 still sufficient for accurate results?
Thank you again, sir!
WGS 84 is not a projection. It is just a coordinate system.
Alright, Sir. Thank you for your response.