If you wish to watch PART 1 it is here! Piers Morgan: The Insider! DINNER With A Duchess & The Fake FOOTMAN Part 1 th-cam.com/video/FX4aIQmh91Y/w-d-xo.html
Shauna I just love your perceptive comments and your easy manner, it's like dropping in and having a chat with a good friend . Love it, keep them coming x
Very true but you also have to know when you go to an interview with people like that it's happening so you should avoid them altogether or be prepared.
Piers should have done a book about Diana's numerous love affairs. Everyone in Diana's circle knew that she was a serial cheater but the public was unaware and still thought she was a saint.
On the other hand, Diana was faithful until after Harry’s birth when she decided that since Charles was still seeing his old girl friend since before they were married, she would seek love elsewhere.
As far as James Hewitt, I have to say that he did have his side of the story. I'm not anti-Diana, but I think her part in it has been glossed over. His life was really destroyed whether he told his side of the story or not. I remember reading his book when it came out, and I don't recall his having said anything bad about her. Their relationship had already been exposed. He would have been better off not having met her.
I haven’t read his book yet! I think a lot of normal people get damaged when they get entwined with Royalty…He well may be one of them…out of his depth!
King Charles would have been better off not having met Diana. She is STILL causing problems after all these years. Camila is a lovely warm lady but Diana's lies almost destroyed her!
My son is a journalist and he's worked for all different local newspapers, government run newspapers and has been asked to operate outside the morals and ethics he was taught at uni (as well as in our home) He's now working for a radio station running their digital department and is much happier. You have to be a certain type of person. Thankyou for your reviews. They are very interesting. 12:34
Interesting. I can see Diana doing that, knowing how manipulative she could be. She had come to see Fergie as a rival and a threat to her status as the most popular royal wife. She definitely would have removed that threat if she saw the chance. However, I thought that Sarah had no choice after the topless, toe Buckingham photo scandal. I know that Phillip was furious and effectively exiled her from any of the RF's gatherings.
The British Press in the late 80s and all through the 90s was 1 huge cespit thanks to Bob Maxwel And Rupert Murdoch. They started a war between tabloids and as press titles came up for sale they snapped them up, promising the readership they're would be no change in editorial policy. This led to the feeding frenzy on celebrities and royals. It also led to newspaper editors bullying anyone and everyone to get whatever stories they wanted. We as a family gave up reading any news papers, as did many others. But Maxwell and Murdock still carried on slugging it out to control the press. Then they moved into TV new that's how we now have wall to wall celebrity gossip instead of actual news
Roughly 12 - 15 years ago Andrew Denton interviewed Dame Elisabeth Murdoch on his TV program, `Elders'. Apart from her being as sharp as a tack (no mean feat for someone pushing the 100 mark) I remember Andrew carefully asking her about Rupert. Her answer, while carefully delivered, was rather telling. It went something like: "I don't always agree with everything Rupert does or says, but what I usually say when asked this question is that he's a wonderful father, and a very good son." For me, there is so much there that she wasn't prepared to articulate in a public interview.
I had a better opinion of Piers _before_ this book! His tactics seem awful to me. Although who goes to a meeting with an editor thinking it's just an innocent lunch... Point aside, the real casualty of all these recent books is Diana, or rather Diana's saintly image. As more comes out, we see how she must have been quite difficult to deal with (Fergie being outright impossible).
Thank you again for a gob-smacking video. I did not realize what a CAD Piers Morgan actually is, not much better than MM IMHO! Kudos to you for being sensitive enough to not want to sacrifice another person for your own gain/popularity, a rare character quality indeed. Cheers!
Another terrific video! It is a real joy watching you. Morally, I think that I would agree with Kant's first moral imperative which is that people must always be seen as an end and not a means.
Funny how it was okay for Diana to out Charles and yet its called betrayal that Hewitt did it to her. He had a right to expose Diana's 5 year old affair...
You are the proof that one can have good ethics and still be entertaining. I don’t want to be entertained when somebody is paying a high personal price. There’s a limit and you said it clearly 👏
This really was mesmerizing. All kinds of thoughts, coincidences, and comparisons were spinning in my head. I was dehydrated from just thinking. Fascinating work, Shauna.
Thank you for your integrity. Piers will get his, at least I hope he does. Time have a way of catching up with people like him, call it karma, what you sew is what you reap whatever name that you put on it, at some point and time Piers will not out run it. You don't behave like that in your journalistic career and make money out of people's pain and discomfort and get off Scott free. He should have a talk with Martin Bashir. I put Piers Morgan in the same category. I wouldn't even want to hear his take on the betrayer of his family and his wife.
Being the cynic that I am I find it hard to believe that monthlies with Sarah were because he thought she was a wonderful woman. Sarah was frequently cash strapped so I do find it significant.
Listening to you describe Diana not speaking to Sarah for a year because she disclosed that Diana had plantar warts, I suddenly understand where Harry gets his stubbornness. There were many wonderful things about Diana, but that was absolutely no reason to stop speaking to Sarah. I can understand being cross, but in a way that lasts a day or two, not a year.
Maybe if you realize that it hurts to have a supposed friend take shots at you? Even if it was true about the shoes, why would you tell the world about it. Sarah is no friend to anyone.
@@tricianilsson6870 Why does anyone say anything? Sarah probably thought it was quite harmless. There’s no reason to be embarrassed about plantar warts. They happen. The point of my remark is that a year is a ridiculous amount of time to avoid speaking to someone over something like that. Especially given how short life is, which, if she could speak about it now, I’m sure Diana would understand in hindsight.
@@thevintageread Very possible. I was just sad to hear that something had prevented two people from speaking for a full year, given how short life ultimately is ❤️
Diana is said to have ditched numerous old friends and associates in her final years, on the grounds of "betrayal". Diana was also not on speaking terms with her own mother at the time of Diana's death. Yet she and Diana had formerly been very close. Surprisingly, Diana in her final year became friends with her previously loathed stepmother Raine Spencer (whom Diana admitted to pushing down a flight of stairs as recently as 1990, when Diana was already almost 30 years old.)
Wouldn’t this book written by Piers Morgan himself be the kind of “evidence” that Prince Harry and his lawyers should have presented in their court case?
Well newspapers have been paying huge settlements to victims from this time… it is no secret. But they prefer settlement rather than risk court judgements that could open the floodgates on further claims!
Shauna, I look forward to every episode. You are such a delight AND I love every blouse you wear!! You're just lovely. Thanks for insightful and entertaining content!!
Hi Shauna ~ Thanks for this one! Rupert Murdoch is still at it!! He owns Fox. We’ve a Fox cable news channel. The last time I watched it was in the ‘90s. It was dreadful then and it’s dreadful now. So much for the 4th Estate. It’s teetering on death. Like you, I enjoy a bit of gossip but not the malicious type. I’m glad you don’t share every eye popping story you unearth. I think your content is just splendid. Thanks for all the reading you do!! Patty fm Philly. 🇺🇸🇺🇸We’re celebrating our Independence Day, today.🇺🇸🇺🇸
I’ll tell what’s dreadful, mainstream media here in America! That’s why I’m on you tube and other stations! Mainstream media is so far up the left’s a** it’s not funny! Fox is better but not by much! I studied journalism and broadcasting in college and am disgusted at the lack of morals we have in our government and media! I’m truly afraid for the following generations.
I’m with you on this. They say that everyone has a price, though I don’t agree with that. We are the ones that have to live with our conscience (for us that have one). Life is hard enough without making it harder for others. And money doesn’t bring happiness. I think honesty and integrity are virtues that will leave a good legacy.
Hi Shauna! You and I must have encountered a similar experience. If someone runs across information that they KNOW is something NOT for them to share, you don't. It is called integrity. That is why some jobs can only go to people with no conscience. I would have to answer to myself, and God.
Obviously, Kensington Palace wanted to return the letters hoping they would go public. Princess Diana was already starting to get Martyr/Sainthood status even before she died!
The trouble with writing a book about yourself is the stories involve other people, and often one violates their privacy in telling your story. Discretion is the better part of valor indeed -- and is in short supply! As for James Hewitt, yes he is a cad. He was willing to cuckold the heir to the throne, cooperated with an indiscreet book about Diana, and was willing to sell Diana's private love letters to him for the right price/ conditions. The tabloids don't come out of this smelling of roses either, but one must own one's own part.
It's not as if he forced himself on Diana. Clearly she put the moves on him and many a man succumbed to those blue eyes and her lonely, innocent act. But also, no one would have known had she no t thrown him to the wolves by bringing him up and referring to him by name in her interview with Martin Bashir. She was very manipulative and vindictive if you crossed her or if she perceived you as some kind of a threat, like she did with Fergie.
I was interested in your statement regarding Princess Diana’s’ love letters belonging to the recipient James Hewitt. I agree and have always believed (on the best authority) that mail belongs to the recipient as soon as it is in the Royal Mail posting box. Now I am asking why Meghan Markle has claimed and was supported by a Crown court, that letters she sent to her father belong to her? It is bizarre!
I am glad that the Press in the UK are generally more decent now after that horrible decade in the eighties. Calling out shenanigans and misdemeanors is so much better than covert acts and cover ups.
True journalism is almost dead, isn’t it? (Thanks to Murdoch) Really sad stuff. I’ve always thought Piers was terrible and without ethics, seems as if I was right. I will admit to watching him when he takes on Megain…because no one rips apart her baloney better. Now, I’m questioning my own ethics for doing so. Lol. He shouldn’t get the ratings. Oh well.
I enjoyed Pierces views about Harry and Meghan. He was saying what we were thinking. I like your videos and ethics. Good for James Hewitt writing his own book. His wife selling Diana’s letters though? I applaud the palace for sending the letters to James Hewitt. Like the blouse.
Yes of course! it is an example of the type of story you can expect if you purchase Piers Morgan’s book. It is of interest because it was published in the early 2000s and reflects the questionable antics of the press at the time.
I am confused about "the recipient of a letter is the legal owner". How did the five friends of MM get away with revealing the contents of Thomas Markles letter to people magazine, or even know of its content, if it was his personal property? Why was MM able to claim ownership of it, if it was not legally hers? She should pay back her £1 compensation to the courts.😂
@@thevintageread I don't understand that at all. I still can't see how that Judge ruled in MM's favor. Why didn't the Mail appeal that verdict? Especially since she lied under oath and the defense never got a chance to present certain evidence or testimony. It was almost as though the judge had made his mind up, even before the case was presented in court. I never understood why they didn't appeal
Thank-you Shauna for all your videos , such a great variety for everyone . I really enjoy your background , all the old books, magazines, and vinyl records, do you sell them or is it your personal collection?
The media landscape in the 1980s and 1990s was certainly as you say the Wild West. I also remember when James Hewitt was public enemy number 1, as the media said he was shopping around the love letters via his girlfriend. I also remember the photo's of Prss Diana getting into Richard Kays car for a nice long chat. She would unload all her miseries onto him. I've always thought Piers operates below the belt. Thanks for a good video Shauna.
Hi Shauna, I’m glad you are seeing Morgan’s moral character for what it is. However, on the opinions he has it is easy to agree with him on most things, but he is no better than Markle for jumping on the latest bandwagon and feeling the latest zeitgeist. He is very entertaining, and knows a lot of famous people, but he’s a hypocrite. Publishing fake photos of our soldiers - despite his own brother being a veteran. Knowing about a murdered girl’s phone being hacked (he was the editor of course he did) giving her poor parents false hope. He says he was friends with Diana, but she invited him to KP once for lunch to meet William to get him to stop publishing articles about her and the Princes. They had one lunch or trust me that would have been in his diaries, monthly meetings with the Princess. To those who say there are many photos of them together, these would be functions, not tete a tetes. Like Markle he knows where the cameras are. Look what he said about Trump. Compared his response to the pandemic to Markle’s saying hers was more heartfelt. Trump gave him a job when he was unemployable over here due to the fake photos and hacking scandals. he put him on the apprentice thus leading the way to him getting the late night talk show where he told Americans to surrender their arms. He’s a snake, and just as bad as Markle, in my opinion.
I don't know about Piers ethics, from back in the day as a newspaper editor. But going by what I see on screen now, and not always agreeing with him. He seems measured, not afraid to give his opinion, even when unpopular, or against the grain, has even owned on TV, when wrong, and stands corrected on issues. When he has guests on, to contribute to a topic, has people from every extreme of view, e.g Harry and Meghan, from a die hard fan, to not. Let's not forget, if he hadn't voiced his opinion on Harry and Meghan, to extent he did, he was enemy number one, labelled the biggest racist, lost his job. And hasn't he been proven write, to point people can openly call them out, without an onslaught of abuse now.
That is very true. He is a very complex character! All the stories I have told were detailed by him so I don’t think he would mind them being shared. The whole book is very honest and confronting!
@@thevintageread I think I will leave the expertise of reviewing, in your very balanced, entertaining way, that you do, to you on these books. Plus some of the torturous one's, you've endured (Spare), I could spare myself from. I have not subscribed to any other person, and I'm not a social media person. I find your approach, very informative, interesting, thoroughly researched. Your like a real life, Miss Marple. You should be an investigative journalist, or sleuth writer (the fictional Jessica Fletcher comes to mind 😂). I find your breaking off mid sentence, to tell us, a cockatoo is making a noise outside, or something, enlightening. Something we do not have in the UK, our equivalent, is pigeons outside. It kind of transportes us to your country for a second in imagery. Thank you.
@Rumkitty2000 Wow! Your correcting my 'write' to 'right', a year after that comment was added. Well I hope my command of the English language, vocabulary, and punctuation, isn't that terrible, that your finding it hard to interpret, the point I was trying to convey.
PM is a grub...I bet you felt mentally grubby after reading his book even if bits of it amused!!! As for Fergie - she's always in it for herself... Keep up the entertaining videos Shauna and I applaud your circumspection in not using things discovered that could be harmful 👏👏😎
😂😂😂😂 I'd be pissed, too, if I were Diana and my friend told the world that I gave her warts. I'd just want to crawl under my blankets and stay there for a month until the story died down. Some things you keep to yourself.
I love Dianna, however, I believe she was complicite in what was revealed to the media. She played them as the maestro she had learned to become. Meghan is, or has been, trying to emulate this.
She was in an environment where it is sink or swim. She chose to swim. Diana had a very different life to Camilla. Diana had to fight to survive, unlike Camilla who had and has Charles to protect her and Kate has William.
IMO they all used Diana, the proverbial cash cow. Her family, the press, authors, friends, lovers, and employees. They are still using her to this day. Granted she was as flawed as we all are, and not a saint. Every generation throws up a false god to worship.
You are my favorite royal report because you don't make outlandish accusations but instead pose intriguing questions, state verified facts, and give us something to think about. You are an excellent sleuth, and no, you would not be a very good Rupert Murdoch employee but perhaps Scotland Yard? I totally agree with @juliebasford1976 your posts are like having tea with a close friend.
thank you for living out your morals and ethics...it makes you more credible...i, too, would never want to do anything that benefited myself if it harmed others...
Who doesn't use Di's memory alive and dead, she is still used to this day, time to let her rest,let meg talk to her lol,James is just one of many, Fergie is a Frienermy to di and royals
Piers is entertaining. He certainly knows how to excite or exacerbate a situation. He only has ethics when it pertains to himself. His integrity is questionable, as is his honor. He sure can be a catty, petty little b at times. I imagine he acts as a spoiled brat in private relationships.
To answer your question, Shauna, about moral goalpost: My bar is high, mainly because I have self respect. I want to like the person I see in the mirror. Also, Karma can be a bitch.
I actually recall Fergie saying that herself and Dianna agreed to divorce at the same time, Fergie went ahead and jumped ,Dianna didnt ,which Fergie felt Di had set her up then let her down, if true it was a dreadful thing to do, I always thought Fergie far more likeable than Di, she didn't seem to use people then blame them, took responsibility for her own actions. Di seemed to have a trait of falling out with people and not speaking to them when it suited her.Dropped James Hewitt completely because he went to Afghanistan with his soldiers,rather than renaging on his mates and duties and stay at home loving her, even Dodie said that Di demanded to be adored ,life doesn't work that way. Harry seems to be a needy ,demanding person as well. perhaps that's why so many of Dianna's relationships ended.
I disliked him for a long time, but when he started talking about Harry and Meghan, I couldn't remember why! Thanks to you, Shauna and @thevintageread , I now remember why. I thought he was a real jerk on The Apprentice
Revisiting this re Piers...man i hope karma visits him now. He disappointed us over our Princess Catherine 😢. Why couldn't he stay focused on Rachel....
I am like you in that I enjoy a good gossip without malice and I do watch Piers Morgan on occasion for the tyrannical drama. Something I have noticed is that presenters, like Piers, become very comfortable in the persona that they want us to see that they actually relax and facets of their true character begin to show. Sometimes I go Uh Oh so there you are when I spot those slips but what really happens is that over time an accumulation of hints of true character either verbally or in their body language occur so that instead of revelatory moments there is more a shift in how I feel about them. In Piers Morgan’s case I started out, earlier , in a fairly neutral frame of mind and even began to enjoy his verbal attacks and style but now I find him distasteful and the nuances in language and his body language, mostly facial, give me an uncomfortable feeling about him. I have learned to trust in my long life my instincts formed from my life experiences so I give him more misses than views now and I feel more comfortable myself because I do. Your presentations are so enjoyable because I feel that what I see & hear is what I get. Open, honest and entertaining. Thank you. Aussie Old Lady
@@laurielovett8849. I think you have that absolutely right, Diana was the arch manipulator hiding behind that nauseating under the lashes look which she perfected. She was rapacious.
Its called Morals and Ethics and you have both Shauna, dont ever change. You make me laugh and the seriousness of some of your comments are true to form. Keep on keeping on, there isnt many people in the media that have set their standards at a level where pointing things out can hurt others for whatever reason. You could be offered millions of dollars but IMO I can see you would live in a shed before taking money in such a immoral way because that would mean guilt would probably eat you up. Congratulations, keep doing what you're doing. You'll be loved by more people than you realise. And dont forget either, OPINIONS are just that, OPINIONS and we are all entitled to them because we have that right to state them or not.💜❤
I watched the lost tapes of Diana and how she talks about her affairs. How her mother walked away from the family. How people thought she was a real bore at the beginning and took all those lessons to become a better public speaker. It’s really interesting because it’s her speaking. She’s telling her stories. She also learned to use the media to her advantage instead of working against them. Piers may be a narcissist but he also calls out Prince Williams brothers wife. He still is respected to the monarchy. I wonder how much the palace had to give to media over the years because of the behaviour of their members?? Better to get it straight from the source than it going through the rumour train
As usual , very entertaining ! In my youth , I was appaled by the american politics , of digging dirt on the candidates... Something that never happened in canada in those days, we respected their private lives... Not so sure now.... Still, it is a shame...
*Appalled* is spelled with two "Ls". Also, country names and nationalities are proper nouns, and as such should be capitalized. It's Canada, not canada, and American, not american. How can you reach adulthood and not know these things?
Well all I can say is I am glad Im not a person of interest! Regarding morals - the papers are there to make money and they wouldnt print it if people stopped reading it so everyone is a fault really!
The only decent thing Murdoch has ever done in his lifetime, was to renounce his Australian citizenship when our govt at the time would not permit him to behave in the way he has behaved elsewhere. Thanks, Murdoch, for Fox and Trump. Murdoch and Piers Morgan are both (insert many cuss words here).
Just to back you up, the York girls were just at lunch with Piers a few weeks ago and they are all clearly friends and i doubt they would be doing that if Fergie wasnt his friend who did lunches with him.
I’m confused. Piers Morgan is disclosing what an awful person he is in HIS book? Why would anyone portray themselves like that and admit to so many dishonest deeds?
Many of us dislike Meghan for her character, lies and treatment of her husband’s family. Piers, I think, hates her because she’s like him. I bet she frustrated him a lot with her antics which were things Piers himself would do, albeit much more discreetly
I was reading comments on dreadful Piers, and I can't help feelimg we forget everything, everyone, all of us were different decades ago. Think how beating a wife could almost be a domestic issue, and for some a private affair. I tend to think he now is a person of this time, just like the rest.
Right off topic , Shauna - but Lady C ‘S latest video has an excellent comment 600 or 700 ‘ likes ‘ Re MM channeling Princess Diana . Her follower says it all so succinctly Worth a read . Further off topic - Tom Bower trying to be sensational again? Tom Bower feeds on gossip and can be a nasty smirking smart aleck, IMO Remember old fashioned SNAP card game ? He reminds me of The Old Maid .
Thank you; another enjoyable video. To answer your moral goalposts question, I believe that you "reap what you sow". Most of us will work a situation to our advantage, and that will often be "at a cost" to someone else - how else do YOU get the job and S/HE does not, that sort of thing. But to abuse a situation to solely benefit yourself to the detriment of someone else or to take an action solely for the purpose of harming someone else, well, karma's a b*tch and she hurts a lot more when she's had time to work up speed. And to what end behaving that way? Because rarely does a negative/abusive action result in a "clean getaway", even if it is "only" your own conscience eating away at your soul.
In my opinion and experience, the best moral shortcut is never lie. Lies (whether by action or by omission) just indicate something is wrong. And if you think a lie may spare someone's feelings, think that the other person has a right to the truth.
Another fascinating video🌻. Rupert Murdoch is a ruthless man and has no moral compass IMO. Loathe to see the many bodies he has stepped over in his many decades of being a media mogul. As for the way he treats women ugh!
I saw a TV interview with JH and I found him absolutely creepy..sitting in a bubble bath smoking a pipe and skiting about the size of his todger. He came across as a very unlikeable person who was very spoilt. I wanted to like him but , nope
Don't tell me he was obsessed with his todger too, I thought that was only an obsession of his son. Father and Son ( The Two Todgers)sounds like a double tap dancing act
If you wish to watch PART 1 it is here! Piers Morgan: The Insider! DINNER With A Duchess & The Fake FOOTMAN Part 1
th-cam.com/video/FX4aIQmh91Y/w-d-xo.html
Shauna I just love your perceptive comments and your easy manner, it's like dropping in and having a chat with a good friend . Love it, keep them coming x
Thank you! It’s easy in this community…so many lovely people 😊🤗
And the beautiful accent! Love it!
Yes, that's it exactly. Like having a cuppa and a chat with an old friend. 😊
The story of planting microphones in plants to record Hewitt is a good characterization of Morgan’s overall ethic.
Very true but you also have to know when you go to an interview with people like that it's happening so you should avoid them altogether or be prepared.
Good for you! We need ethics and morals these days more than ever! Respectfully, KB
Piers should have done a book about Diana's numerous love affairs. Everyone in Diana's circle knew that she was a serial cheater but the public was unaware and still thought she was a saint.
Yes well it is all out there now! 😂 He does detail a lot of it! It is a fun and shocking book to read!
On the other hand, Diana was faithful until after Harry’s birth when she decided that since Charles was still seeing his old girl friend since before they were married, she would seek love elsewhere.
@@VKing-di9loCharles wasn't. He had cut all ties with Mrs. Parker Bowles when he became engaged to Diana.
He gave Camilla a bracelet and she gave him cuff links with CC.
As far as James Hewitt, I have to say that he did have his side of the story. I'm not anti-Diana, but I think her part in it has been glossed over. His life was really destroyed whether he told his side of the story or not. I remember reading his book when it came out, and I don't recall his having said anything bad about her. Their relationship had already been exposed. He would have been better off not having met her.
I haven’t read his book yet! I think a lot of normal people get damaged when they get entwined with Royalty…He well may be one of them…out of his depth!
Agree -and what about the fiancée, selling the love letters! Perhaps it's true there's a kind of curse in improper involvements with RF members.
@@thevintageread Well said, and he was way out of his depth with Diana for sure.
King Charles would have been better off not having met Diana. She is STILL causing problems after all these years. Camila is a lovely warm lady but Diana's lies almost destroyed her!
My son is a journalist and he's worked for all different local newspapers, government run newspapers and has been asked to operate outside the morals and ethics he was taught at uni (as well as in our home) He's now working for a radio station running their digital department and is much happier. You have to be a certain type of person. Thankyou for your reviews. They are very interesting. 12:34
You must be very proud of him x
I always believed that Diana persuaded Fergie to divorce Andrew. Either way they were two very immature ‘girls’
Interesting. I can see Diana doing that, knowing how manipulative she could be. She had come to see Fergie as a rival and a threat to her status as the most popular royal wife. She definitely would have removed that threat if she saw the chance. However, I thought that Sarah had no choice after the topless, toe Buckingham photo scandal. I know that Phillip was furious and effectively exiled her from any of the RF's gatherings.
The British Press in the late 80s and all through the 90s was 1 huge cespit thanks to Bob Maxwel And Rupert Murdoch. They started a war between tabloids and as press titles came up for sale they snapped them up, promising the readership they're would be no change in editorial policy.
This led to the feeding frenzy on celebrities and royals. It also led to newspaper editors bullying anyone and everyone to get whatever stories they wanted.
We as a family gave up reading any news papers, as did many others. But Maxwell and Murdock still carried on slugging it out to control the press. Then they moved into TV new that's how we now have wall to wall celebrity gossip instead of actual news
True!
Roughly 12 - 15 years ago Andrew Denton interviewed Dame Elisabeth Murdoch on his TV program, `Elders'. Apart from her being as sharp as a tack (no mean feat for someone pushing the 100 mark) I remember Andrew carefully asking her about Rupert. Her answer, while carefully delivered, was rather telling. It went something like: "I don't always agree with everything Rupert does or says, but what I usually say when asked this question is that he's a wonderful father, and a very good son."
For me, there is so much there that she wasn't prepared to articulate in a public interview.
I saw that too! What a wonderful lady she was, I loved her in that interview 💗
I had a better opinion of Piers _before_ this book! His tactics seem awful to me. Although who goes to a meeting with an editor thinking it's just an innocent lunch...
Point aside, the real casualty of all these recent books is Diana, or rather Diana's saintly image. As more comes out, we see how she must have been quite difficult to deal with (Fergie being outright impossible).
Yes my opinion of Piers has suffered too! 😥🤨🥹
We know Diana wasn't saintly but she did do a lot of good in the world .
Thank you again for a gob-smacking video. I did not realize what a CAD Piers Morgan actually is, not much better than MM IMHO! Kudos to you for being sensitive enough to not want to sacrifice another person for your own gain/popularity, a rare character quality indeed. Cheers!
Piers must have the best stories! He’s sassy and a little mischevious… 😂 I’m sure he’ll keep some for respect to HMTQEII ❤
He is a weasel and has low integrity.
Another terrific video! It is a real joy watching you. Morally, I think that I would agree with Kant's first moral imperative which is that people must always be seen as an end and not a means.
I like that! 🤗
Funny how it was okay for Diana to out Charles and yet its called betrayal that Hewitt did it to her. He had a right to expose Diana's 5 year old affair...
Powerful point you make there!
BUT Diana's version was not truthful. She was vengeful and determined to hurt Charles even if she had to lie to do it!
Completely agree! I'm fond of Hewitt. 😊
Totally agree with you. Diana was no saint!!
@@abbatrouble Are you on Camilla's payroll????
You are the proof that one can have good ethics and still be entertaining. I don’t want to be entertained when somebody is paying a high personal price. There’s a limit and you said it clearly 👏
This really was mesmerizing. All kinds of thoughts, coincidences, and comparisons were spinning in my head. I was dehydrated from just thinking. Fascinating work, Shauna.
Thank you for your integrity. Piers will get his, at least I hope he does. Time have a way of catching up with people like him, call it karma, what you sew is what you reap whatever name that you put on it, at some point and time Piers will not out run it. You don't behave like that in your journalistic career and make money out of people's pain and discomfort and get off Scott free. He should have a talk with Martin Bashir. I put Piers Morgan in the same category. I wouldn't even want to hear his take on the betrayer of his family and his wife.
It does catch up doesn’t it!
@thevintageread I strongly believe it does, journalist have a long successful career without stopping so low and getting in the gutter for a scoop.
Shauna I love your delicious stories.
Thank you❣️
Glad you like them!
Piers Morgan and Sarah's monthlies. Can't seem to get past that.
I can’t! I think it is truly significant.
Being the cynic that I am I find it hard to believe that monthlies with Sarah were because he thought she was a wonderful woman. Sarah was frequently cash strapped so I do find it significant.
Monthlies 🩸😬
@@notbill08 Yeah, I thought the same thing. Only one thing comes to mind when I hear that phrase.
Listening to you describe Diana not speaking to Sarah for a year because she disclosed that Diana had plantar warts, I suddenly understand where Harry gets his stubbornness. There were many wonderful things about Diana, but that was absolutely no reason to stop speaking to Sarah. I can understand being cross, but in a way that lasts a day or two, not a year.
I think it was a feeling she was playing both sides more than the warts 😂 But I could be wrong!
Maybe if you realize that it hurts to have a supposed friend take shots at you? Even if it was true about the shoes, why would you tell the world about it. Sarah is no friend to anyone.
@@tricianilsson6870 Why does anyone say anything? Sarah probably thought it was quite harmless. There’s no reason to be embarrassed about plantar warts. They happen. The point of my remark is that a year is a ridiculous amount of time to avoid speaking to someone over something like that. Especially given how short life is, which, if she could speak about it now, I’m sure Diana would understand in hindsight.
@@thevintageread Very possible. I was just sad to hear that something had prevented two people from speaking for a full year, given how short life ultimately is ❤️
Diana is said to have ditched numerous old friends and associates in her final years, on the grounds of "betrayal". Diana was also not on speaking terms with her own mother at the time of Diana's death. Yet she and Diana had formerly been very close. Surprisingly, Diana in her final year became friends with her previously loathed stepmother Raine Spencer (whom Diana admitted to pushing down a flight of stairs as recently as 1990, when Diana was already almost 30 years old.)
Wouldn’t this book written by Piers Morgan himself be the kind of “evidence” that Prince Harry and his lawyers should have presented in their court case?
Unless it's stated in the book he hacked into Harry's phones or put recording devices in his residence, I don't think so.
Well newspapers have been paying huge settlements to victims from this time… it is no secret. But they prefer settlement rather than risk court judgements that could open the floodgates on further claims!
Shauna, I look forward to every episode. You are such a delight AND I love every blouse you wear!! You're just lovely. Thanks for insightful and entertaining content!!
Oh thank you!
Shauna I really enjoy your channel!! Loved your ghost story!!
Thank you so much!!
Hi Shauna ~ Thanks for this one! Rupert Murdoch is still at it!! He owns Fox. We’ve a Fox cable news channel. The last time I watched it was in the ‘90s. It was dreadful then and it’s dreadful now. So much for the 4th Estate. It’s teetering on death. Like you, I enjoy a bit of gossip but not the malicious type. I’m glad you don’t share every eye popping story you unearth. I think your content is just splendid. Thanks for all the reading you do!! Patty fm Philly.
🇺🇸🇺🇸We’re celebrating our Independence Day, today.🇺🇸🇺🇸
Happy 4th of July x💗💗💗
HAPPY 4TH JULY TO ALL OUR WONDERFUL ALLIES IN AMERICA 🇺🇸 ❤️ 😀
I’ll tell what’s dreadful, mainstream media here in America! That’s why I’m on you tube and other stations! Mainstream media is so far up the left’s a** it’s not funny! Fox is better but not by much! I studied journalism and broadcasting in college and am disgusted at the lack of morals we have in our government and media! I’m truly afraid for the following generations.
Please make longer videos. I really enjoy them. Thank you.
Glad you like them!
I’m with you on this. They say that everyone has a price, though I don’t agree with that. We are the ones that have to live with our conscience (for us that have one). Life is hard enough without making it harder for others. And money doesn’t bring happiness. I think honesty and integrity are virtues that will leave a good legacy.
Hi Shauna! You and I must have encountered a similar experience. If someone runs across information that they KNOW is something NOT for them to share, you don't. It is called integrity. That is why some jobs can only go to people with no conscience. I would have to answer to myself, and God.
Love your channel! Intelligent, classy and wonderfully entertaining. Thank you x
Wow, thank you!
Obviously, Kensington Palace wanted to return the letters hoping they would go public. Princess Diana was already starting to get Martyr/Sainthood status even before she died!
Oh! I didn’t even think of that! 😳
The trouble with writing a book about yourself is the stories involve other people, and often one violates their privacy in telling your story. Discretion is the better part of valor indeed -- and is in short supply! As for James Hewitt, yes he is a cad. He was willing to cuckold the heir to the throne, cooperated with an indiscreet book about Diana, and was willing to sell Diana's private love letters to him for the right price/ conditions. The tabloids don't come out of this smelling of roses either, but one must own one's own part.
It's not as if he forced himself on Diana. Clearly she put the moves on him and many a man succumbed to those blue eyes and her lonely, innocent act.
But also, no one would have known had she no t thrown him to the wolves by bringing him up and referring to him by name in her interview with Martin Bashir. She was very manipulative and vindictive if you crossed her or if she perceived you as some kind of a threat, like she did with Fergie.
I agree I would not be comfortable working for any business not interested in the truth. unfortunately the truth doesn’t sell as many papers.
I was interested in your statement regarding Princess Diana’s’ love letters belonging to the recipient James Hewitt. I agree and have always believed (on the best authority) that mail belongs to the recipient as soon as it is in the Royal Mail posting box.
Now I am asking why Meghan Markle has claimed and was supported by a Crown court, that letters she sent to her father belong to her? It is bizarre!
Physical ownership is distinct from copyright ownership...Meghan's case was based on the latter I believe! 😀
I don't tolerate betrayal That is the lowest rung of Hell
I am glad that the Press in the UK are generally more decent now after that horrible decade in the eighties. Calling out shenanigans and misdemeanors is so much better than covert acts and cover ups.
True journalism is almost dead, isn’t it? (Thanks to Murdoch) Really sad stuff. I’ve always thought Piers was terrible and without ethics, seems as if I was right. I will admit to watching him when he takes on Megain…because no one rips apart her baloney better. Now, I’m questioning my own ethics for doing so. Lol. He shouldn’t get the ratings. Oh well.
I think EVERYBODY enjoyed his views on the Harry and Meghan! They thought they had treated their families badly so I think your ethics are sound! 😉💗
I enjoyed Pierces views about Harry and Meghan. He was saying what we were thinking. I like your videos and ethics. Good for James Hewitt writing his own book. His wife selling Diana’s letters though? I applaud the palace for sending the letters to James Hewitt. Like the blouse.
*Piers* not "Pierce".@@jayniekinser7029
The information you share is what is already published. But interesting insight!
Yes of course! it is an example of the type of story you can expect if you purchase Piers Morgan’s book. It is of interest because it was published in the early 2000s and reflects the questionable antics of the press at the time.
I am confused about "the recipient of a letter is the legal owner". How did the five friends of MM get away with revealing the contents of Thomas Markles letter to people magazine, or even know of its content, if it was his personal property? Why was MM able to claim ownership of it, if it was not legally hers? She should pay back her £1 compensation to the courts.😂
Well copyright is different from physical ownership. The owner was James Hewitt however the copyright belongs to the writer I believe.
I heard the same. Copyright and ownership are not the same.
@@thevintageread I don't understand that at all. I still can't see how that Judge ruled in MM's favor. Why didn't the Mail appeal that verdict? Especially since she lied under oath and the defense never got a chance to present certain evidence or testimony. It was almost as though the judge had made his mind up, even before the case was presented in court. I never understood why they didn't appeal
Piers Morgan is a cad to put it nicely.
He is a very complex character!
@@thevintageread I'm a retired journalist with no respect for his tactics or Rupert Murdoch's. It's not ethical and not how real journalism is done.
@@eleanoraquitaine2966 I miss those golden days of journalism. It used to be such a respected profession.
@@SarahGreen523 Murdoch destroyed it.
@@thevintagereadYou do have a lovely way with words.
Always love your story telling and commentary.
Thanks for listening
Thank-you Shauna for all your videos , such a great variety for everyone . I really enjoy your background , all the old books, magazines, and vinyl records, do you sell them or is it your personal collection?
Hope this helps the Christmas break
It did! 😘💕
Shauna ,You are Extremely articulate &eloquent with a lovely voice !⭐️⭐️🥰⭐️
Wow, thank you!
@@thevintageread 🥰🙏🩷
Excellent videos on PM.
Thanks!
Glad you like them!
The media landscape in the 1980s and 1990s was certainly as you say the Wild West. I also remember when James Hewitt was public enemy number 1, as the media said he was shopping around the love letters via his girlfriend.
I also remember the photo's of Prss Diana getting into Richard Kays car for a nice long chat. She would unload all her miseries onto him. I've always thought Piers operates below the belt.
Thanks for a good video Shauna.
I thought Piers was a vindictive jerk, but doxxing Hewitt is beyond low.
Hi Shauna, I’m glad you are seeing Morgan’s moral character for what it is. However, on the opinions he has it is easy to agree with him on most things, but he is no better than Markle for jumping on the latest bandwagon and feeling the latest zeitgeist. He is very entertaining, and knows a lot of famous people, but he’s a hypocrite. Publishing fake photos of our soldiers - despite his own brother being a veteran. Knowing about a murdered girl’s phone being hacked (he was the editor of course he did) giving her poor parents false hope. He says he was friends with Diana, but she invited him to KP once for lunch to meet William to get him to stop publishing articles about her and the Princes. They had one lunch or trust me that would have been in his diaries, monthly meetings with the Princess. To those who say there are many photos of them together, these would be functions, not tete a tetes. Like Markle he knows where the cameras are. Look what he said about Trump. Compared his response to the pandemic to Markle’s saying hers was more heartfelt. Trump gave him a job when he was unemployable over here due to the fake photos and hacking scandals. he put him on the apprentice thus leading the way to him getting the late night talk show where he told Americans to surrender their arms. He’s a snake, and just as bad as Markle, in my opinion.
Yes I agree only only lunch with Diana…monthly with Fergie 😉
I don't know about Piers ethics, from back in the day as a newspaper editor. But going by what I see on screen now, and not always agreeing with him. He seems measured, not afraid to give his opinion, even when unpopular, or against the grain, has even owned on TV, when wrong, and stands corrected on issues. When he has guests on, to contribute to a topic, has people from every extreme of view, e.g Harry and Meghan, from a die hard fan, to not. Let's not forget, if he hadn't voiced his opinion on Harry and Meghan, to extent he did, he was enemy number one, labelled the biggest racist, lost his job. And hasn't he been proven write, to point people can openly call them out, without an onslaught of abuse now.
That is very true. He is a very complex character! All the stories I have told were detailed by him so I don’t think he would mind them being shared. The whole book is very honest and confronting!
@@thevintageread I think I will leave the expertise of reviewing, in your very balanced, entertaining way, that you do, to you on these books. Plus some of the torturous one's, you've endured (Spare), I could spare myself from. I have not subscribed to any other person, and I'm not a social media person. I find your approach, very informative, interesting, thoroughly researched. Your like a real life, Miss Marple. You should be an investigative journalist, or sleuth writer (the fictional Jessica Fletcher comes to mind 😂). I find your breaking off mid sentence, to tell us, a cockatoo is making a noise outside, or something, enlightening. Something we do not have in the UK, our equivalent, is pigeons outside. It kind of transportes us to your country for a second in imagery. Thank you.
Ahem! It's "Proven *right* as in correct. Not *write* as in putting your thoughts on paper.
Seriously?
@Rumkitty2000 Wow! Your correcting my 'write' to 'right', a year after that comment was added. Well I hope my command of the English language, vocabulary, and punctuation, isn't that terrible, that your finding it hard to interpret, the point I was trying to convey.
PM is a grub...I bet you felt mentally grubby after reading his book even if bits of it amused!!! As for Fergie - she's always in it for herself...
Keep up the entertaining videos Shauna and I applaud your circumspection in not using things discovered that could be harmful 👏👏😎
Good day shauna and all ❤Happy 4th july to all you Americans on here 😀 ❤, Shauna you are creeping up to 30k subs ,,wonderful 👏👏❤
So close!
I can't imagine lending my shoes to Fergie: "No really, just keep them. Or burn them."
😂😂😂😂 I'd be pissed, too, if I were Diana and my friend told the world that I gave her warts. I'd just want to crawl under my blankets and stay there for a month until the story died down. Some things you keep to yourself.
I love Dianna, however, I believe she was complicite in what was revealed to the media. She played them as the maestro she had learned to become. Meghan is, or has been, trying to emulate this.
She was in an environment where it is sink or swim. She chose to swim. Diana had a very different life to Camilla. Diana had to fight to survive, unlike Camilla who had and has Charles to protect her and Kate has William.
IMO they all used Diana, the proverbial cash cow. Her family, the press, authors, friends, lovers, and employees. They are still using her to this day. Granted she was as flawed as we all are, and not a saint. Every generation throws up a false god to worship.
True!
Piers is fierce! I wouldn't trust him when he's looking for a scoop. That's pretty low down his revenge on Hewitt.
You are my favorite royal report because you don't make outlandish accusations but instead pose intriguing questions, state verified facts, and give us something to think about. You are an excellent sleuth, and no, you would not be a very good Rupert Murdoch employee but perhaps Scotland Yard? I totally agree with @juliebasford1976 your posts are like having tea with a close friend.
That’s lovely thank you xxx
thank you for living out your morals and ethics...it makes you more credible...i, too, would never want to do anything that benefited myself if it harmed others...
Who doesn't use Di's memory alive and dead, she is still used to this day, time to let her rest,let meg talk to her lol,James is just one of many, Fergie is a Frienermy to di and royals
and relieving herself on Dianas grave... black magic.
Piers is entertaining. He certainly knows how to excite or exacerbate a situation. He only has ethics when it pertains to himself. His integrity is questionable, as is his honor. He sure can be a catty, petty little b at times. I imagine he acts as a spoiled brat in private relationships.
He is incredibly complex… this book has amazed me!
@@thevintageread You keep saying that. I'm half convinced.
To answer your question, Shauna, about moral goalpost: My bar is high, mainly because I have self respect. I want to like the person I see in the mirror. Also, Karma can be a bitch.
It is!
I never liked Piers back then, terrible behaviour, but recently I've been watching him since he left main stream media and I quite like him now.
Yes many people do 😊
@@thevintageread I should say, I just agree with some of his views. I still think he has a lot to answer for though.
I actually recall Fergie saying that herself and Dianna agreed to divorce at the same time, Fergie went ahead and jumped ,Dianna didnt ,which Fergie felt Di had set her up then let her down, if true it was a dreadful thing to do, I always thought Fergie far more likeable than Di, she didn't seem to use people then blame them, took responsibility for her own actions. Di seemed to have a trait of falling out with people and not speaking to them when it suited her.Dropped James Hewitt completely because he went to Afghanistan with his soldiers,rather than renaging on his mates and duties and stay at home loving her, even Dodie said that Di demanded to be adored ,life doesn't work that way. Harry seems to be a needy ,demanding person as well. perhaps that's why so many of Dianna's relationships ended.
I disliked him for a long time, but when he started talking about Harry and Meghan, I couldn't remember why! Thanks to you, Shauna and @thevintageread
, I now remember why. I thought he was a real jerk on The Apprentice
Revisiting this re Piers...man i hope karma visits him now. He disappointed us over our Princess Catherine 😢. Why couldn't he stay focused on Rachel....
I am like you in that I enjoy a good gossip without malice and I do watch Piers Morgan on occasion for the tyrannical drama. Something I have noticed is that presenters, like Piers, become very comfortable in the persona that they want us to see that they actually relax and facets of their true character begin to show. Sometimes I go Uh Oh so there you are when I spot those slips but what really happens is that over time an accumulation of hints of true character either verbally or in their body language occur so that instead of revelatory moments there is more a shift in how I feel about them. In Piers Morgan’s case I started out, earlier , in a fairly neutral frame of mind and even began to enjoy his verbal attacks and style but now I find him distasteful and the nuances in language and his body language, mostly facial, give me an uncomfortable feeling about him. I have learned to trust in my long life my instincts formed from my life experiences so I give him more misses than views now and I feel more comfortable myself because I do.
Your presentations are so enjoyable because I feel that what I see & hear is what I get. Open, honest and entertaining. Thank you.
Aussie Old Lady
Thanks! I really appreciate your interesting comment!
It's ironic that Diana totally cut off Fergie for that, imagine her reaction to Harry and Meghan.
I think Diana felt she couldn't really trust her! I actually think it was a wise move...but that's just my opinion!
Dianna adored Harry for his awful treatment of others,she would be very pleased with her son and daughter in law for doungher dirty work for her.
* for doing her
@@laurielovett8849. I think you have that absolutely right, Diana was the arch manipulator hiding behind that nauseating under the lashes look which she perfected. She was rapacious.
With you on that Shauna.
Is that sheet music on your shelves? Love it!
Yes 😊
Its called Morals and Ethics and you have both Shauna, dont ever change. You make me laugh and the seriousness of some of your comments are true to form.
Keep on keeping on, there isnt many people in the media that have set their standards at a level where pointing things out can hurt others for whatever reason. You could be offered millions of dollars but IMO I can see you would live in a shed before taking money in such a immoral way because that would mean guilt would probably eat you up.
Congratulations, keep doing what you're doing. You'll be loved by more people than you realise. And dont forget either, OPINIONS are just that, OPINIONS and we are all entitled to them because we have that right to state them or not.💜❤
😘💗 Thanks x
Sounds like the press was like the wild west back in then!
It does doesn’t it!
I watched the lost tapes of Diana and how she talks about her affairs. How her mother walked away from the family. How people thought she was a real bore at the beginning and took all those lessons to become a better public speaker. It’s really interesting because it’s her speaking. She’s telling her stories.
She also learned to use the media to her advantage instead of working against them.
Piers may be a narcissist but he also calls out Prince Williams brothers wife. He still is respected to the monarchy.
I wonder how much the palace had to give to media over the years because of the behaviour of their members?? Better to get it straight from the source than it going through the rumour train
Yes, it really is a fascinating book...worth a read!
Goodmoring from 🇺🇸
Wow, all the players in this story are slimy!
No wonder, Harry and William hate Piers.
Yes!
🥳👏🏽🤗
As usual , very entertaining !
In my youth , I was appaled by the american
politics , of digging dirt on the candidates... Something that never happened
in canada in those days, we respected their private lives...
Not so sure now.... Still, it is a shame...
*Appalled* is spelled with two "Ls". Also, country names and nationalities are proper nouns, and as such should be capitalized. It's Canada, not canada, and American, not american. How can you reach adulthood and not know these things?
Well all I can say is I am glad Im not a person of interest! Regarding morals - the papers are there to make money and they wouldnt print it if people stopped reading it so everyone is a fault really!
True!
Well after hearing that about piers Morgan my respect for him has dropped that's a crule nasty thing to do really to Diana and her family
The only decent thing Murdoch has ever done in his lifetime, was to renounce his Australian citizenship when our govt at the time would not permit him to behave in the way he has behaved elsewhere. Thanks, Murdoch, for Fox and Trump. Murdoch and Piers Morgan are both (insert many cuss words here).
We don’t want him back in OZ! 😂
Just to back you up, the York girls were just at lunch with Piers a few weeks ago and they are all clearly friends and i doubt they would be doing that if Fergie wasnt his friend who did lunches with him.
Yes! Also I don’t think Piers would lie about that in his own book! 😂💗
God is watching......
Like father like son indeed. You know who!
🥴🥴🥴
"Like father, like son indeed."
To whom are you referring?
I’m confused. Piers Morgan is disclosing what an awful person he is in HIS book? Why would anyone portray themselves like that and admit to so many dishonest deeds?
I think he just thinks that is what the job entailed… also I think he wanted to tell before anybody else did!
@@thevintageread that makes sense, thanks
listening to this its giving me high pressure they wont say it was gossip and the poppers that made Diana loose control and die. This is sick.
Oh, no. I wouldn't .. make that COULDN'T work for a Rupert Murdoch, or a Rupert Murdoch wannabe in any form. I'm proud of you, sister !!!
💕
Many of us dislike Meghan for her character, lies and treatment of her husband’s family. Piers, I think, hates her because she’s like him. I bet she frustrated him a lot with her antics which were things Piers himself would do, albeit much more discreetly
It’s a cut throat world. I must admit I like Piece, except when the talks way to loud over people he’s interviewing.
Such dirty tricks by these media people. Everything for a story that probably isn't true or partially true at most....
Pierce may have learned his lessons. Nobody is perfect. I am willing to give Pierce a chance.
Of course! He published this book because he wanted to document it himself.
I was reading comments on dreadful Piers, and I can't help feelimg we forget everything, everyone, all of us were different decades ago. Think how beating a wife could almost be a domestic issue, and for some a private affair.
I tend to think he now is a person of this time, just like the rest.
Stephen Fry's brilliant pun that "English countryside is the murder of Pierce Morgan"
Fits well with the story.
I have to say I don’t think the media are much better now. If I was honest I think they are worse.
You might be right!
What about the chickens??? Who's taking care of the chickens?????
😂
All the people involved are nasty people.
Agree toxic pit for those 3. Rebecca Brooks seriously corrupt
Right off topic , Shauna - but Lady C ‘S
latest video has an excellent comment
600 or 700 ‘ likes ‘
Re MM channeling Princess Diana .
Her follower says it all so succinctly
Worth a read .
Further off topic -
Tom Bower trying to be sensational again?
Tom Bower feeds on gossip and can be a nasty
smirking smart aleck, IMO
Remember old fashioned SNAP card game ?
He reminds me of The Old Maid .
Thank you; another enjoyable video. To answer your moral goalposts question, I believe that you "reap what you sow". Most of us will work a situation to our advantage, and that will often be "at a cost" to someone else - how else do YOU get the job and S/HE does not, that sort of thing. But to abuse a situation to solely benefit yourself to the detriment of someone else or to take an action solely for the purpose of harming someone else, well, karma's a b*tch and she hurts a lot more when she's had time to work up speed. And to what end behaving that way? Because rarely does a negative/abusive action result in a "clean getaway", even if it is "only" your own conscience eating away at your soul.
In my opinion and experience, the best moral shortcut is never lie. Lies (whether by action or by omission) just indicate something is wrong. And if you think a lie may spare someone's feelings, think that the other person has a right to the truth.
Yes that is a realistic view! I think I tend to take a romantic view of things sometimes! 😂
I am with you, I haven't even read James Hewitts book, live by the sword, die by the sword, doesn't have to be taken literally.
Another fascinating video🌻. Rupert Murdoch is a ruthless man and has no moral compass IMO. Loathe to see the many bodies he has stepped over in his many decades of being a media mogul. As for the way he treats women ugh!
I agree! Not a huge fan myself.
I saw a TV interview with JH and I found him absolutely creepy..sitting in a bubble bath smoking a pipe and skiting about the size of his todger. He came across as a very unlikeable person who was very spoilt. I wanted to like him but , nope
Oh! I'll have to look that one up!
Don't tell me he was obsessed with his todger too, I thought that was only an obsession of his son. Father and Son ( The Two Todgers)sounds like a double tap dancing act
I like Piers Morgan cad or not 😂
😂 Many do!
Ah Shauna " to thine own self be yrue" etc etc. I think You have to be able to look yourself in the eye in the mirror and not cringe at what you see.
Rupert Murdoch is the worst form of...
Did James Hewitt end up marrying that woman who sold his letters? Piers Morgan is an interesting character with questionable morals.
Very interesting! Just don’t get too close! 😂 No he didn’t marry Anna!