I would play 2 dozens, and instead of covering the zeros(which never hit in this session) I would cover 1 Street or 1 Corner in the dozen that is not covered with that same $2 unit. This will give you more even wins and not throw away money hoping for a zero jackpot to win. Betting on the zeros and never hitting zero, lost a lot of money. In 40 spins, you lost at least $80, and that is not counting when the bets were raised, so you lost over $100 by betting on the zeros, so instead of $200 profit you could be at $300 profit. This is why I don't bet on zeros as 'jackpot' numbers, but casinos love players who cover zeros, or any numbers, covered as jackpot numbers. Thank You Todd and Thank You TRM.
Great analysis...I noticed that also. Players are too in love with 0 and lose a lot of money with the green monster. Over $100 lost on green...senseless betting.
@@hobie1115 And when they finally hit a 0/00, they think, WOW, look at that huge win, when in reality, they are just making up some of the losses that they incurred earlier, and they are still not in profit from covering the zeros.
The wheel does have a memory, an external one, referenced as the reader board. Anyone can look at the past with this & look for streaks & bias's. Reading it is one thing, reading into it is another. The reader board is your friend & the memory you say the wheel doesn't have.
@@Paulstringerhughes-sj4nk So what is your knowledge in gaming? Pit boss, table games manager or perhaps student at MIT with a degree in quantum mathematics? Unless you have some type of credentials or accolades to your name, you're spewing armchair quarterback stuff that you heard from another armchair quarterback. Please expand so myself & others can learn from your decorated education in this field.
It’s a known fact. It’s called the gamblers fallacy. It has been proven a million times by people with way more credentials than anyone you or I know. Please lol it up, you will be surprised. Unless you feel you are smarter than the best scholars in the world. In which case you can keep making silly comments.
the rushed fibonacci progression is what stands out as a plus... instead of 1 1 2 3 5 8 ect. progression its 1 3 5 8 ect. progression.... works better on a 2/3 odds bet than a 50/50 odds bet
@OgopogoResortMinden That's not what it states in the headline. If we follow your logic, it should state "10XXX Sessions Without a Loss". That would be honest.
The first system is like standing in a hole and digging it deeper with a small shovel. Yes it got a bad streak, but if you’ve played roulette for any length of time, bad streaks happen a lot. Yesterday I was playing double dozens on a live wheel and the same dozen hit 10 times in a row. Actually 9 with a zero mixed in for good measure. Never seen 1 dozen hit that long. The 2nd system, if you’re lucky enough to play a European wheel like I am, the zero is the same as every other number on the board. Don’t throw profit out the window hoping 1 number will hit a jackpot.
Lucky on 2 system. You can not win with this in a long run, i know but a short session you can win and also lose. NO matter what system or same numbers you play you lose in a long run If you play online roulette. Only way to win is to change your numbers and have a plain how you do it. Best way is to play random and a very slow progression up when you lose until profit or a slow possitive progression when you win until profit. Play safe it's Hard to beat roulette but not impossible If you have a good plan. RM most always start with 10 unit, when i play i start with 10 cent and can do very good profit with that so start as low as possible..
In terms of the "Holy Grail" and going up a unit and not going back until you reach a certain profit goal, etc. It would make more sense, due to variance and how the math works, to do a single spin for your profit goal rather than a bunch of small ones.
The roulette wheel, board, layout, and bets have not changed for hundreds of years, and yet there are "NEW" winning strategy videos every day, all claiming to be the BEST.
You were $30 away from $300 could have lowered your bets to reduce losses and instead the table rolled several losses in a row. Ben there and done that as well. Best to be satisfied and leave with $270. Great video subscribed. Hit me back 👊
The roulette wheel, board, layout, and bets have not changed for hundreds of years, and yet there are "NEW" winning strategy videos every day, all claiming to be the BEST.
This guy is worst player on youtube with click bait videos. No one has the best strategy. The wheel is round like a clock land in certain places at certain times. It will land your numbers in a hot session. Don't play any strategy. Just keep your numbers same everytime take the small loss.
sure but in this example, he never hit the zero...so if you take the zero out of the equation, comparing the first holy grail that also bet on the dozens, compared to the newer regression system, there was a dramatic difference in the profitability
"go up 3 units " from 10 - 30 ...... thats 2 units . 2nd progression " so now we are going up 2 units " you went up 2 units before . So are you supposed to go up 2 units or 3 units on first loss ?
Second system, starting bet $10 on each of two dozen, $2 on zero. Call that 1 unit. Progression 1, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34 etc. It is Fibinacci from 4th bet. Yes TRM has a very confusing way of explaining these very complex systems, and does not know system names. I have pointed this out to him many many times, Explain the system to begin, and add a comment with the description. He never has, and seems never will follow listeners requests. However I pointed out several months ago that none of the systems had lost, and it was clear he was doing reruns if needed so a system looked good. Within a day or two he posted systems that lost, stating I want you to see the good and bad of a system.
I beat Roulette every time I play. The biggest drawback though is that when I hit an insanely long losing streak, it takes longer to recover, so my play time can be quite long, but in the end, I make money every time.
It can be beaten. The key is small starting bets, a good bankroll, a half-way decent strategy and discipline. Most people are missing one of these...for me, discipline is the toughest. That being said, I play baccarat far more than roulette. Main reason is online casinos are blatant cheaters.
A true comparison is having the same string of numbers for each strategy. There are simulators that will allow you to so. Then it would be a true comparison.
@@robbroxton8312 Product is called Xtreme Roulette. It will allow you to import data via a .txt file. Then you can compare two strategies with the same numbers
If you wish to foolishly martingale up your bets with each loss at least reset once your back to even. Save your bankroll and collect your comp credits. Come on people your smarter then this. And btw 10,000 spins no losses.....what a crock.
I would play 2 dozens, and instead of covering the zeros(which never hit in this session) I would cover 1 Street or 1 Corner in the dozen that is not covered with that same $2 unit. This will give you more even wins and not throw away money hoping for a zero jackpot to win. Betting on the zeros and never hitting zero, lost a lot of money. In 40 spins, you lost at least $80, and that is not counting when the bets were raised, so you lost over $100 by betting on the zeros, so instead of $200 profit you could be at $300 profit. This is why I don't bet on zeros as 'jackpot' numbers, but casinos love players who cover zeros, or any numbers, covered as jackpot numbers.
Thank You Todd and Thank You TRM.
Great analysis...I noticed that also. Players are too in love with 0 and lose a lot of money with the green monster. Over $100 lost on green...senseless betting.
When u cover the zero, another number becomes the zero...
@@hobie1115 And when they finally hit a 0/00, they think, WOW, look at that huge win, when in reality, they are just making up some of the losses that they incurred earlier, and they are still not in profit from covering the zeros.
@@yvosjauw6661 Very well said!
The true master (KentuckWhite) has spoken ! Lol. Great observation, man !
At 10:54 time stamp, you have to be a special kind of stupid to make a $200 bet when you are only $10 from your next profit goal.
While the wheel doesn't have a memory, I do like to move the bets around.
The wheel does have a memory, an external one, referenced as the reader board. Anyone can look at the past with this & look for streaks & bias's. Reading it is one thing, reading into it is another. The reader board is your friend & the memory you say the wheel doesn't have.
@@sonnyzaro7664 It's called a dummy board for a reason. The history of the spins don't mean anything.
@@sonnyzaro7664 The mind play tricks on you when see patterns.
@@Paulstringerhughes-sj4nk So what is your knowledge in gaming? Pit boss, table games manager or perhaps student at MIT with a degree in quantum mathematics? Unless you have some type of credentials or accolades to your name, you're spewing armchair quarterback stuff that you heard from another armchair quarterback. Please expand so myself & others can learn from your decorated education in this field.
It’s a known fact. It’s called the gamblers fallacy. It has been proven a million times by people with way more credentials than anyone you or I know. Please lol it up, you will be surprised. Unless you feel you are smarter than the best scholars in the world. In which case you can keep making silly comments.
the rushed fibonacci progression is what stands out as a plus... instead of 1 1 2 3 5 8 ect. progression its 1 3 5 8 ect. progression.... works better on a 2/3 odds bet than a 50/50 odds bet
On even money, up 1 on loss, down 2 on win. Worst of this you have to get back to 1 unit to proffit just 1 unit. Also only one 1 unit bet
Fibonacci does not work on 2 dozen, it works only on 1 dozen.
If you lose 7 times in a row you lost 1700$ and you pretty much done.
I play a similar strategy. I bet the dozen that just hit and the dozen that’s hit the least in the last 5 rolls. I always put insurance on the 0s.
I like that strategy
10,000 spins, no losses, he spins 4 times a loss. So much for that theory
The first spin you did you lost . Please be honest with your title.
when he speaks of no loss, he is speaking of the session and or a series of progressions that wins and resets to zero
@OgopogoResortMinden That's not what it states in the headline. If we follow your logic, it should state "10XXX Sessions Without a Loss". That would be honest.
@@OgopogoResortMindenyou would think that would be common sense
@@OgopogoResortMindenHe said “spins”, not session. Go back and read the title.
Clueless!
Why do you place a 200 Dollar bet if the Target is only 10 Dollar away......?
The first system is like standing in a hole and digging it deeper with a small shovel. Yes it got a bad streak, but if you’ve played roulette for any length of time, bad streaks happen a lot. Yesterday I was playing double dozens on a live wheel and the same dozen hit 10 times in a row. Actually 9 with a zero mixed in for good measure. Never seen 1 dozen hit that long.
The 2nd system, if you’re lucky enough to play a European wheel like I am, the zero is the same as every other number on the board. Don’t throw profit out the window hoping 1 number will hit a jackpot.
Yes same here, played last night at my local casino and the 2nd dozen was only interrupted by a 0/00 for 12 spins! luckily it didn't affect my strat
How do I distribute the bets on a double 00 wheel? Most of the people here have to play on an American 00 wheel.
Hitting 7 1/3 dozens in a row is 2140-1, can you hit this 7 times in a row from 2140 attemps. 🤔
Lucky on 2 system. You can not win with this in a long run, i know but a short session you can win and also lose. NO matter what system or same numbers you play you lose in a long run If you play online roulette. Only way to win is to change your numbers and have a plain how you do it. Best way is to play random and a very slow progression up when you lose until profit or a slow possitive progression when you win until profit. Play safe it's Hard to beat roulette but not impossible If you have a good plan. RM most always start with 10 unit, when i play i start with 10 cent and can do very good profit with that so start as low as possible..
In terms of the "Holy Grail" and going up a unit and not going back until you reach a certain profit goal, etc. It would make more sense, due to variance and how the math works, to do a single spin for your profit goal rather than a bunch of small ones.
We lost 71 units in 15 minutes with the " holy grail", but that's ok..... ummm maybe it's not the holy grail if it's losing 5 units/min.
The roulette wheel, board, layout, and bets have not changed for hundreds of years, and yet there are "NEW" winning strategy videos every day, all claiming to be the BEST.
What roulette program are you using
You were $30 away from $300 could have lowered your bets to reduce losses and instead the table rolled several losses in a row. Ben there and done that as well. Best to be satisfied and leave with $270. Great video subscribed. Hit me back 👊
The roulette wheel, board, layout, and bets have not changed for hundreds of years, and yet there are "NEW" winning strategy videos every day, all claiming to be the BEST.
This guy is worst player on youtube with click bait videos. No one has the best strategy. The wheel is round like a clock land in certain places at certain times. It will land your numbers in a hot session. Don't play any strategy. Just keep your numbers same everytime take the small loss.
@@Paulstringerhughes-sj4nkyet you are on his channel watching and commenting. OK
Can you do this with the Fibonacci betting method?
Os are already 35:1 why stack it
Triplegale with a zero kicker ? What could possibly go wrong?
🤣🤣🤣
It's a hundred spins I'm worried about😂
Betting on two dozens and the 0, adding 3 units on a loss, nothing new
Precisely
Nothing new but does it consistently work ?
sure but in this example, he never hit the zero...so if you take the zero out of the equation, comparing the first holy grail that also bet on the dozens, compared to the newer regression system, there was a dramatic difference in the profitability
the rushed fibo progression is what stands out as a positive. intead of 1 1 2 3 5 8 ect its 1 3 5 8
Betting on two dozens with a progression is suicide 😮
Depends on your bank and table max.
Absolutely not true.
It will work until the dreaded 10 plus run on the dozen you are not covering happens and believe me it will 🥵
@@Wayne_boje it can’t. I said I play the last one that hit plus the one that hit the least.
So RM played the system wrong yet again
fair
"go up 3 units " from 10 - 30 ...... thats 2 units . 2nd progression " so now we are going up 2 units " you went up 2 units before . So are you supposed to go up 2 units or 3 units on first loss ?
Second system, starting bet $10 on each of two dozen, $2 on zero. Call that 1 unit. Progression 1, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34 etc. It is Fibinacci from 4th bet.
Yes TRM has a very confusing way of explaining these very complex systems, and does not know system names. I have pointed this out to him many many times,
Explain the system to begin, and add a comment with the description. He never has, and seems never will follow listeners requests.
However I pointed out several months ago that none of the systems had lost, and it was clear he was doing reruns if needed so a system looked good. Within a day or two he posted systems that lost, stating I want you to see the good and bad of a system.
There is No Holy Grail! Roulette is not Beatable! 😢😢😢
I beat Roulette every time I play. The biggest drawback though is that when I hit an insanely long losing streak, it takes longer to recover, so my play time can be quite long, but in the end, I make money every time.
@kentuckwhite6701 If anyone could beat Roulette, the Casino's would get rid of the Game!!
@@kentuckwhite6701
Are you still using your moving corners ?
Or do you have a new one
It can be beaten. The key is small starting bets, a good bankroll, a half-way decent strategy and discipline. Most people are missing one of these...for me, discipline is the toughest. That being said, I play baccarat far more than roulette. Main reason is online casinos are blatant cheaters.
@@kentuckwhite6701 correct
Comparing on 2 different wheels is not right
A true comparison is having the same string of numbers for each strategy. There are simulators that will allow you to so. Then it would be a true comparison.
@jeff0807
Please let us know what those simulators are. Thank you.
@@cassandrathatsme4382 xtreme roulette. It will allow you to import data via a .txt file
@@robbroxton8312 Product is called Xtreme Roulette. It will allow you to import data via a .txt file. Then you can compare two strategies with the same numbers
Trying to answer Cassandra’s question but my answer keeps getting deleted
If you wish to foolishly martingale up your bets with each loss at least reset once your back to even. Save your bankroll and collect your comp credits. Come on people your smarter then this. And btw 10,000 spins no losses.....what a crock.
First thing 10,000 spin no loss 😅😂 I tested and lost my Bank roll lol.
You should only do 0/00 because single 0 roulette minimum bet is $50 to $100 dollars
Wait until u meet the AI evolution roulette..u will never win.