Has potential. I'm in Atlantic City and some live table dealers and certain round-seating mechanical wheels have a slight consistent bias to the center column. Did real well last night and more than paid for breakfast already this morning. I may give this one a shot based on the bias I see.
@cassandrathatsme4382 By observing the bet patterns of other players and seeing over a period of 20-25 spins the frequency of winning numbers that come up which play into my system. I wait, pounce and get out quick, then repeat the process. (Edit: Ending the second evening of playing up $220 tonite. In all the sessions I played yesterday and today (roughly 15-18 sit down sessions), every session was profitable. I walked away with more money than I put into the machine. 🙏
@yournightmareracing1754 I understand that, but your assertion that numbers were coming up as consistent winners in tbe second column can happen. But only by coincidence, not by any bias. Stay at the wheel.long enough and that perceived bias washes away.
Lets see ....9 numbers that win 11 numbers that lose. plus you double up on losses. this spells bankruptcy.
25 วันที่ผ่านมา +2
There’s more than one way of doing it….DONT wanna bet higher after losses??? So don’t bet after losses…..Bet only after wins…..And stay out of the game until you see a winning number hit then bet again….I tested this in a casino for 200 spins….And the highest the losses went was 4 …..The 5th always bet won…. 200 spins….in a casino…At a real roulette wheel….Not online…. …..
It's great to be flexible with your systems, and it's good to test them repeatedly to watch for win/loss raitos. That is how you choose the best systems for your style of playing and how you beat the casinos.
Anything can happen in 200 spins. Had he not “sat out”, he would have been in profit. He missed WAY more wins than he avoided by sitting out. Not to mention sitting out would only make sense if you knew ahead of time the pattern the wheel was going to throw your way. And we don’t. So sitting out is plain stupid. I get it, we all seen 10-15 losses in a row on a dozen before. But since you have no idea whether those losses will come consecutively, or alternatively, sitting out just makes no sense from any mathematical standpoint. Just like today, play the tape back and count. You will see he would have been in serious profit, all the way till the end. And at the end it would have ate into the profit. “Gamblers Falacy” that the wheel has some memory. It’s a human nature thing to want to sit out. But from a statistacal standpoint, nope. I can’t believe with all the knowledge and statistics published online, that people STILL believe that.
@@michaelhaverstock7125 In a way the wheel has a memory otherwise colours woudnt always quite exactly even out after many spins, Thats why it makes sense to figuer out a system.
Sit out? Do you realize that the next spin is not dependent on anything prior? It is always about you and not the wheel. That may be a lot to digest but that is the way life is.
Yeah as soon as I hear “sit out a spin or until….” I’m out. Stupidest concept ever. You sit out a winner, and get back in on loser exactly the same amount of times over 1,000 spins. The reader board a the roulette wheel costs people so much money. Black just hit 10 times in a row “so it must hit now right” “ that defies all odds to hit 11 times in a row”. Actually the odds are exactly the same as they were on spins 2,5 and 8.
Never seen a casino that gives me six spins a minute even if you're making a few hundred dollars in a Live casino you're lucky to make enough for a cup of coffee casino
Sometimes, we need to step back and separate our emotions (perceptions) from what actually took place. The first system lost badly, but it lost completely honestly. 68 spins 5 were either 0 or 00 63 remaining between 3 dozens 21 would be the expected average per each dozen, but there could be a swing either way as 68 spins is hardly a good sized sample. The losing third dozen received: 22 spins Completely within margin of error and expected averages, meaning the system itself is not sound even when given statistically advantageous spins. All of the talk about receiving bad spins is out the window, completely. This system would have done even better had it not been waiting out after losses, and it would have done far better still had it included 0/00 along with the 2 dozens. It lost on its own merits in highly advantageous spins. Math matters!
Hey blue moon, ive noticed that you do some nice work delivering well thaught out systems and this 11 11 is a nether good one. Nice work! You have a nice 50/50 system hear while also haveing a good show for the comp credits. Its to bad the "master" dont reolise the 2/00 is a smaller win and thinks it may matter to sit out when hitting the first 12. Kinda like a good will hunting thing haveing to watch him fumble through your work. Well done. That said while im not a fan of the martingale this may be the one area you kinda droped the ball in the math. Thier are several things that could be done to martingale within the math of your system, hear is just 1 idea. Dont go up untill your 2nd loss. This keeps you inside your 50/50 coverage helping to protect your bankroll But very nice work bro or bro-et!
Oh look....another system where you need a unrealistic 2000 dollar bankroll and you just double up on a loss. More of the same. I like your channel RM, but you really need to switch things up. Suggestion, ...start playing on a live table with real money like many other channels do. Also, just show us the system you are reviewing, no need to put it up against any other system. It's not realistic anyways, because the only way to know who would win between 2 systems is to use the same exact spins for both. Just sayin.....cheers!
About the first system ...I would never play it... About the second system...I wonder if TRM understand that with 45 dollar starting bet and doubling after each loss ( Martingale ) with 2.000 bankroll you can do only bet 45,90,180,360 and 720...5 bets and actually is not a 2.000 dollar system,it is only 1395 dollars system.. Also a big problem with the second system is that you make profit in a single hit with only 8 winning numbers in the second column...if you hit numbers 0,00,or 2 you are not always in profit except at 45 dollars bet..At 90,180,360 and 720 dollars bet if you hit 0,00,or 2 you are still in minus.. Basically at 45 dollars bet you have 11 winning profitable numbers,11 losing numbers and 16 break even numbers..But at 90,180,360 and 720 dollars bet you only have 8 winning profitable numbers ( 0,00 and 2 are winning numbers but you are still in minus on them ),and 16 break even numbers.
Not to mention anytime you put money on the board that will only break even, you are putting more money on the board that you will loose in a loss. So higher bet, higher martingale bet. Don’t lay “break even” money on the board ever. It takes from a win, and adds to the losses.
Hey bro… love your series of roulette strategies… had never considered the game until I started seeing your videos. That being said, I offer this bit of constructive criticism: the golf cap is a much better look for you. Ask your wife and close friends and family and see what the general consensus is… again, please don’t be offended… I am an avid golfer and have worked (in my semi-retirement) at the same Texas country club for the past 8 years… I’m in your corner and just trying to help. God bless you and yours.
Has potential. I'm in Atlantic City and some live table dealers and certain round-seating mechanical wheels have a slight consistent bias to the center column. Did real well last night and more than paid for breakfast already this morning.
I may give this one a shot based on the bias I see.
How exactly can that bias be, as those numbers in the centre column are spread around the wheel?
@cassandrathatsme4382 By observing the bet patterns of other players and seeing over a period of 20-25 spins the frequency of winning numbers that come up which play into my system. I wait, pounce and get out quick, then repeat the process.
(Edit: Ending the second evening of playing up $220 tonite. In all the sessions I played yesterday and today (roughly 15-18 sit down sessions), every session was profitable. I walked away with more money than I put into the machine. 🙏
@yournightmareracing1754 I understand that, but your assertion that numbers were coming up as consistent winners in tbe second column can happen. But only by coincidence, not by any bias. Stay at the wheel.long enough and that perceived bias washes away.
Lets see ....9 numbers that win 11 numbers that lose. plus you double up on losses. this spells bankruptcy.
There’s more than one way of doing it….DONT wanna bet higher after losses??? So don’t bet after losses…..Bet only after wins…..And stay out of the game until you see a winning number hit then bet again….I tested this in a casino for 200 spins….And the highest the losses went was 4 …..The 5th always bet won…. 200 spins….in a casino…At a real roulette wheel….Not online….
…..
It's great to be flexible with your systems, and it's good to test them repeatedly to watch for win/loss raitos. That is how you choose the best systems for your style of playing and how you beat the casinos.
Anything can happen in 200 spins. Had he not “sat out”, he would have been in profit. He missed WAY more wins than he avoided by sitting out. Not to mention sitting out would only make sense if you knew ahead of time the pattern the wheel was going to throw your way. And we don’t. So sitting out is plain stupid. I get it, we all seen 10-15 losses in a row on a dozen before. But since you have no idea whether those losses will come consecutively, or alternatively, sitting out just makes no sense from any mathematical standpoint. Just like today, play the tape back and count. You will see he would have been in serious profit, all the way till the end. And at the end it would have ate into the profit. “Gamblers Falacy” that the wheel has some memory. It’s a human nature thing to want to sit out. But from a statistacal standpoint, nope. I can’t believe with all the knowledge and statistics published online, that people STILL believe that.
@@michaelhaverstock7125 I agree, siting out serves no purpose at all other than to ease the mind of the gambler.
@@michaelhaverstock7125 In a way the wheel has a memory otherwise colours woudnt always quite exactly
even out after many spins, Thats why it makes sense to figuer out a system.
Sit out? Do you realize that the next spin is not dependent on anything prior? It is always about you and not the wheel. That may be a lot to digest but that is the way life is.
😂
Yeah as soon as I hear “sit out a spin or until….” I’m out. Stupidest concept ever. You sit out a winner, and get back in on loser exactly the same amount of times over 1,000 spins. The reader board a the roulette wheel costs people so much money. Black just hit 10 times in a row “so it must hit now right” “ that defies all odds to hit 11 times in a row”. Actually the odds are exactly the same as they were on spins 2,5 and 8.
when I play the holy grail I bet on an outside bet to recover after having 3 numbers to bet against like you have done in other videos
First system name. Soap 🧼 and a 🪢 rope! 🤯
Never seen a casino that gives me six spins a minute even if you're making a few hundred dollars in a Live casino you're lucky to make enough for a cup of coffee casino
When both systems win you add the winnings together. So todays title should be lost $1350 Please be consistant
Sometimes, we need to step back and separate our emotions (perceptions) from what actually took place.
The first system lost badly, but it lost completely honestly.
68 spins
5 were either 0 or 00
63 remaining between 3 dozens
21 would be the expected average per each dozen, but there could be a swing either way as 68 spins is hardly a good sized sample.
The losing third dozen received:
22 spins
Completely within margin of error and expected averages, meaning the system itself is not sound even when given statistically advantageous spins.
All of the talk about receiving bad spins is out the window, completely.
This system would have done even better had it not been waiting out after losses, and it would have done far better still had it included 0/00 along with the 2 dozens.
It lost on its own merits in highly advantageous spins. Math matters!
All maths matter!
Hey blue moon, ive noticed that you do some nice work delivering well thaught out systems and this 11 11 is a nether good one. Nice work! You have a nice 50/50 system hear while also haveing a good show for the comp credits. Its to bad the "master" dont reolise the 2/00 is a smaller win and thinks it may matter to sit out when hitting the first 12. Kinda like a good will hunting thing haveing to watch him fumble through your work. Well done. That said while im not a fan of the martingale this may be the one area you kinda droped the ball in the math. Thier are several things that could be done to martingale within the math of your system, hear is just 1 idea. Dont go up untill your 2nd loss. This keeps you inside your 50/50 coverage helping to protect your bankroll But very nice work bro or bro-et!
Oh look....another system where you need a unrealistic 2000 dollar bankroll and you just double up on a loss. More of the same. I like your channel RM, but you really need to switch things up. Suggestion, ...start playing on a live table with real money like many other channels do. Also, just show us the system you are reviewing, no need to put it up against any other system. It's not realistic anyways, because the only way to know who would win between 2 systems is to use the same exact spins for both. Just sayin.....cheers!
You like his channel ? Whinge whinge
About the first system ...I would never play it...
About the second system...I wonder if TRM understand that with 45 dollar starting bet and doubling after each loss ( Martingale ) with 2.000 bankroll you can do only bet 45,90,180,360 and 720...5 bets and actually is not a 2.000 dollar system,it is only 1395 dollars system..
Also a big problem with the second system is that you make profit in a single hit with only 8 winning numbers in the second column...if you hit numbers 0,00,or 2 you are not always in profit except at 45 dollars bet..At 90,180,360 and 720 dollars bet if you hit 0,00,or 2 you are still in minus..
Basically at 45 dollars bet you have 11 winning profitable numbers,11 losing numbers and 16 break even numbers..But at 90,180,360 and 720 dollars bet you only have 8 winning profitable numbers ( 0,00 and 2 are winning numbers but you are still in minus on them ),and 16 break even numbers.
Not to mention anytime you put money on the board that will only break even, you are putting more money on the board that you will loose in a loss. So higher bet, higher martingale bet. Don’t lay “break even” money on the board ever. It takes from a win, and adds to the losses.
Why not just put $20 on the 2nd and 3rd dozen? You profit $15 when they hit instead of zero.
Hey bro… love your series of roulette strategies… had never considered the game until I started seeing your videos. That being said, I offer this bit of constructive criticism: the golf cap is a much better look for you. Ask your wife and close friends and family and see what the general consensus is… again, please don’t be offended… I am an avid golfer and have worked (in my semi-retirement) at the same Texas country club for the past 8 years… I’m in your corner and just trying to help. God bless you and yours.
Your rulett wheel is biased to the game
There nearly no first dozen numbers out of 100 spins ...it is not realistic.