OJ Simpson Trial - April 11th, 1995 - Part 1
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ก.ย. 2024
- **We are missing trial footage from April 6th, 1995.
OJ Simpson criminal trial from April 11th, 1995. (Barry Scheck, Hank Goldberg, Testimony From Witness Dennis Fung, Raw, Uncut)
We all went back on Netflix, and benched watched the entire thing, and then came back, and start looking up all these old videos😆😆😆😆😆
#dontlieunowealldidit
Facts. Saw the handshake thing on the show and had to see how accurate it was to real life.
Not I
charlesjeffery1155
Benched watched? Binge watched, there slick.
«Were you taught anything about the dangers of contamination, cross-contamination of samples when collecting them for purposes of DNA testing?»
- Not for DNA testing, no (1:24:00 -)
BOOM.
Barry Sheck just blew up part of the foundation of prosecutor`s case.
According easily manipulated clowns like you, sure. But contamination wouldn't have magically produced OJ's blood at the crime scene unless they had OJ's blood on them from some other means. And there was never any evidence of that. The premise that they mishandled DNA samples doesn't lead to the conclusion "therefore OJ didn't do it" simply because of the fact that OJs DNA (hair and blood) came up time and time again mixed in with the victims. How did his blood get there?
Barry had such forethought in learning about DNA!!!!
Mr. Fung was not having any fun that day
being in court isnt supposed to fun you fkin ferret
@@bwaters735obviously u didn’t watch the testimony of witness #11 keto kaelin
he had a Scheck attack 🦈🦈🦈
He's up against a NYC Jew
"How's that, Mr. Fung!"
"Objection- was that a question"?
haha
That wasn't an objection.
Barry scheck has NYC Jew lawyer written all over him
Goldberg got the award for most overruled objections
Goldberg stapled blank sheets of paper together,then took them apart.When copied they had the staple marks. Scheck is questioning Fung about the sheet thats missing.Goldberg magically produced the other blank sheet.This is where they lost the case.How brilliant was that.
Scheck is the unsung hero of this trial for OJ. All the bigwigs get the credit but this cross examination was very crucial. Plus Scheck started the innocence project which helps wrongly convicted people get out of prison which is an amazing program.
Steven Ladnyk can’t argue with what you wrote. He was OJ’s unsung hero, not anyone who thinks he’s guilty. But, yes, he does amazing work with the innocence project now.
Yes to counterbalance that he is a scumbag that freed a double murderer.
Scheck is the textbook definition of a SLIME!
back in '95 he did amazing work in keeping a double murderer out of jail
Duping a jury with false info to free a brutal, narcissistic killer is a hero?
Best moment in the trial, often missed… When Scheck calls Jonathan Fairtlough Jonathan Fartlow… 😂
I came here to make this comment! Haha 💨
Shrek is not only acting like a jerk, he appears to be one.
😂
For anyone interested, this is the premier of Clark's famous new 150 dollar haircut where she ditches the perm and goes for the shag
The only amazing thing is how theatrics in a trial can convince jurors of something that isn't true
Thank you! Mr. Scheck is quite a performer. Smoke and mirrors.
Scheck had em shook!
Fung acts calm, but at times, I could feel his stress level going up and getting defensive
Surprise he kept his composure
I believe it would have been interesting if they questioned Michelle the maid that Nicole allegedly slapped. She could have gave a lot of information
53:33 How about THAT Mr Fung!
Thanks!
yet Barry had egg on his face when he made accusations that later were clearly proven he was wrong and so how about that Mr Sheck
Big love to everyone who notes times❣️
Are you Swedish, because you look so Swedish? 🤩 🥰 Sorry if that’s a bad question. My best friend, Terri, married a Swedish man and made me love Swedes.
@@LynnAnn588 And yet Oj is found not Guilty because of Shitty police work and incompetent Prosecution Sweetad :)
"I'd like to explore the little knowledge you have" that was GREAT. What a beat down by Shreck
Ant D shrek?? Don’t tell me......Dershowitz must be the donkey then! lol 😝
Poor mr. Fang
Shapiro brought all these NYC jew lawyers with him
@@clevelandindians4843 and that was good.
@@fantastichound it's the reason OJ wasn't found guilty. Johnny C was only icing on the cake
Fung is the worst witness in this case. His delayed answers make you wonder what he is thinking after hearing a question, a simple yes or no answer takes 15 seconds. Barry Scheck ate him for breakfast everyday.
OJ’s trial really became the LAPD’s trial. Those lawyers were impeccable.
The black jury would find him not guilty regardless
Jury was not all black azzhole@@Pedaissance
@@Pedaissancesuch a racist thing to say that statement is one of the reasons race relations are so horrible in this country
@@paulajay473 interesting... considering the jurors outright said their ruling was racially motivated.. you wanna know why race relations are worse? Look at the pres ident from 2008-2016
@@Pedaissancethe black jury? It was Clark who wanted that jury because she thought black women could relate to domestic violence
Dennis Fung is getting on the job training now. (his testimony)
so instead of carrying the body on a stretcher they just dragged it on the ground? this case had so many holes in it
No it didn't. There were trademarked Bruno Magli footsteps stamped across the crime scene. Size 12 which 9% of the population wears in shoes that were only sold at one store in Southern California where OJ shopped. After the trial an old National Inquirer from before the murders resurfaced with photos of OJ in the Bruno Magli shoes.
@@edwards8545no it didnt they tried to say they were Bruno Magli but it was disproven it was then classified as a pair of Italian dress shoes
@@paulajay473 OJ is on video after the trial being shown a photo of himself in the Bruno Magli shoes.
Lmfao so he is changing from different shoes to the magli shoes to murder two people 😂😂🤦🏽♂️@@edwards8545
@@paulajay473 boy are you wrong. If you don’t believe me look up the OJ Simpson FBI that was just released June 2024. There’s alot of reports in there regarding the Bruno Magli shoes.
Why would the LAPD have such a clown for such a high profile case?
A Smith They got by w/ sloppy evidence collection & investigations for years. O.J. just so happened to have the resources to get top notch lawyers that exposed it. Court appointed lawyers could not have pulled this off lol.
Oh my god that's the exact same thing i thought. And to make matters worse all of prosecutions objections are being overruled knowing this bafoon is about to say something stupid again helping OJ out
Look at Marcia once Scheck says "How about that Mr. Fung?" She realizes her case is falling apart in that instance. Fung was a disaster on the stand.
More like she was wondering how exactly that is relevant. Nothing Fung did should make Simpson's blood magically materialize at the crime scene.
At first it was Mark Fuhrman, then it was Fung. The police bungled this case from the start...that started with Mark Fuhrman who was the "one" who discovered the bodies of Nicole Simpson and Ron Goldman also the glove, another thing, Fuhrman had saw Nicole a day before her death.
09rja . Agree.. plus if there was this much contamination as the defense claims, wouldn't you expect to see some crazy results on the blood tests, but every blood drop found at Bundy in the Bronco and at Rockingham came back to OJ Nicole or Ron..
Sheck could not prove that was the envelope, Fung said it wasn't and I am sure marcia will get that on re cross and evidence is so stacked against OJ that OJ was just lucky there was a bias racist jury with no brain cells. Marcia's even whispering and laughing about the photo Barry shown to the jury from the video, she takes care of it in re cross. It's delusional to think Barry proved anything
sweetadvice3 You appear to have a very limited understanding of criminal law in this country. Since I have a law degree, I will enlighten you. Defendants have absolutely no obligation to prove a single thing unless they are asserting one of a limited number of affirmative defenses in trial. Under most circumstances a defendant's obligation is merely to highlight the deficiencies in the prosecution's case which prevent a finding that the defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Mr. Scheck did a fabulous job here of highlighting those deficiencies.
The way the trial is flowing is very interesting. The Prosecution which should be on the Offense scoring points against the defendant, is now on the Defense continuously defending the witnesses that they call to the stand. I can't recall any of their witnesses giving any powerful testimony.
They fcked up the case on purpose so they could write books about it and get rich. Shameful
Denise Brown and Ron Shipp were probably the most impactful witnesses they called, but both of them were early on, and all went towards the same purpose: establishing a motive. But you can’t convict someone on motive alone.
The turning point imo was when the defense basically caused an artificial 1 week delay in the prosecution’s case by trying to get Rosa Lopez, a potential defense witness to testify in the middle of the prosecution case. It sounds insane, which it was, but it was based on her claim of having to leave the country ASAP. They most likely were never going to even call her (and ultimately she never testified in front of the jury) because she had zero credibility. But the whole issue took a week to sort out and established that the defense lawyers had complete control of the courtroom.
I guess in a sense, you could say Mark Fuhrman was the most “impactful” witness they called… just not in the way you’d think.
@@goldenstatewarriors9418 Denise Brown was a proven liar, she claimed OJ was in an Crazed State during the recital, video proved she was lying....
when he has a go at fung, even Marcia was shaking her head lol
I’ve just discovered the existence of these videos... I was actually thinking I would have to physically visit the National Archives, but surprisingly, I think one of the best things about this discovery is seeing the wide and ever-so-varied mix of people who experienced this in much the same way I did at the time, rather than just understanding the trial through the media narrative. It’s almost like discovering a secret society. And it is unquestionably awesome. I am such a geek, but I intend to put together some of the major holes of the prosecution’s physical evidence in the case, including the sock with no foot. But that case, of course, must include some of the Fung testimony. Just kind of incredible to find others who are weird in the same way I was/am. This is literally the first time I’ve come across anyone with the same basic understanding of the case as I had, instead of the ridiculous narrative of “it was all about race” & a “stupid” jury; which is an obvious offshoot of the “it was about race” narrative. 𝖨𝗍’𝗌 𝖺 𝗅𝖺𝗓𝗒, 𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗌𝗍, 𝗎𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗎𝖾 𝗐𝖺𝗒 𝗍𝗈 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝗅𝖺𝗂𝗇 𝖺𝗐𝖺𝗒 𝖺𝗇 𝖺𝖼𝗊𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝗐𝖺𝗌 𝖻𝖺𝗌𝖾𝖽 𝗈𝗇 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗒 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝖼𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗂𝖼 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝖺 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖲𝗍𝖺𝗍𝖾, 𝗐𝗂𝗍𝗁 𝖺𝗅𝗅 𝗂𝗍𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗐𝖾𝗋, 𝗌𝗁𝗈𝗎𝗅𝖽 𝗇𝗈𝗍 𝖻𝖾 𝖺𝗅𝗅𝗈𝗐𝖾𝖽 𝗍𝗈 𝗉𝗎𝗍 𝘢𝘯𝘺𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝖻𝖾𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖽 𝖻𝖺𝗋𝗌 𝖻𝗒 𝗰𝗵𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴.
𝘛𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘪𝘴𝘴𝘶𝘦 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝙖𝙡𝙬𝙖𝙮𝙨 𝘭𝘢𝘳𝘨𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘯 𝙟𝙪𝙨𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗰𝗮𝘀𝗲.
Also want to give serious props to Peter Neufeld, the less entertaining but just as important foundational member of the truly reality altering #InnocenceProject
The movie on Netflix is pretty good too
YoYo Mama Peter Nufeld is relentless! Doesn’t leave any stone unturned he was the best white lawyer on the team :)
NO ONE SAID IT WAS ALL ABOUT RACE, BUT SINCE THIS IS THE USA, OUR HISTORY TELLS US THAT THIS COUNTRY WAS FOUNDED ON INPERIALISM, JUDEO CHRISTIANITY, AND WHITE SUPREMACY. YOU SAID IT WAS CHEATING, WHICH MAKES IT SOUND TRIVIAL, AS IF WE ARE TALKING ABOUT A BALL GAME. THINK ABOUT ALL THE PEOPLE WHO ARE ROTTING IN PRISON BECAUSE THE COPS LIED, AND THEY DID NOT HAVE THE MONEY TO PROVE IT. THE MEDIA AND THE POLICE COVERED UP THE FACT THAT MARK FURHMAN, ONE OF THE LEAD DETECTIVES IS A GENOCIDAL RACIST. LISTEN TO THE FURHMAN TAPES, WHICH THE CORRUPT JUDGE LANCE ITO WOULD NOT ALLOW THE JURY TO HEAR. THERE IS A WHOLE LOT MORE, BUT I HOPE YOU GET THE POINT.
@@medic173 THAT MOVIE IS BS, WATCH THE REAL TRIAL, WHAT ARE YOU AFRAID OF.
He has literally been on the stand so long he can't even focus!
Right lol
"How's that Mr Fung?" OJ lawyers just absolutely torched and ripped this man to pieces on the stand. The most brutal cross examination next to Bailey vs Fuhrman in this trial. OJ's lawyers made an insensitive joke about Fung(" Hang Fung restraunt".)
Jeff Hietala-Find Dr Robin Cotton cross by Peter Neufeld.She admitted the blood was planted.
Baloney!
when?
can u give me a time stamp?
Funniest part, Lol....B. Scheck.."How about that Mr. Fung? Judge: was that a question council?...Lol
This was the most brutal cross examination I have ever witnessed. Scheck ripped Fung apart for 9 days.
I guess we are not watching the same thing then lol
no there was not, just a desperate rant about if if if if if . there was more evidence against OJ than in any other case in history
@@LynnAnn588 more evidence than any case in history?
Did you forget to take your meds?
@@lynndragoman1573 there's so much about this case you just don't know. You should watch my most recent vid. The guest on my vid shares some evidence that would blow your mind. The prosecution was incompetent and that's the ONLY reason he walked free.
But make no mistake about. OJ was GUILTY! My gosh man! One day he visited Nicole's grave site and was seen YELLING AND CUSSING at Nicole's grave. The people who worked at the cemetery had to call the police on him. But he's innocent, right. Give me a fricken break. Only an idiot thinks he's innocent. 🙄
@@sdsstewardIt doesn’t matter whether you think he’s innocent or not it matters whether they proved it beyond a reasonable doubt, which they didn’t. I don’t think he’s innocent but they most certainly did not meet the burden of proof to convict him. Scheck’s extensive cross of Fung created a shit ton of reasonable doubt.
lol did he say fart low
If you look around 50:00 when they are showing the video, you can see in his monitor it's a complete close up showing like half of his body and he's trying to argue that's not an envelope, lol I mean they have it on film
How many videos dose this court case have
@Lamar Brown holly smoke
Geez does this guy recall anything?
As per his answers, I know more about DNA (I am a programmer) than Mr. Fung did then.... he is obviously lying and of course the jurors could also perceive it.
Guiem Miro we ALL know more about DNA than Fung did back then......the murders happened in 1994! Lol! DNA was still in its infancy. And, fung isn’t an analyst....he just collected the evidence. He didn’t test the evidence.
he was just incompetent. the entire forensic was sloppy
he did not know that enough dna can be isolated from one microliter of blood? or what pcr and rflp are? how was he hired?
You are 100% correct. The jurors perception is what killed the prosecutions case. All of these witnesses have been so coached to not answer questions that the jury is ready to strangle them.
When Fung got caught lying about the envelope and then compounded it by saying he didn't even pick up anything until after the coroner's had left the jury knew they where are corrupt.
The jurors later said they hated all the facial expressions being made by Marcia Clark and Christopher Darden. Today they have people in attendance who watch the jury and let the attorneys know what is working and what isn't.
I dont know who lied more, Fung, or furhman
The defense team lied more.
How?
The fact that they lied AT ALL was enough to throw the case out, especially with an admitted racist who assaulted and bludgeoned black and brown bodies for fun, and hated interracial couples...just kinda KILLS their credibility....sorry @1981lashlarue
Doesn't change the evidence. Anyone that thinks OJ is innocent is a fucking moron.
+Jordan Shape Pretty much.
"mr. Fung did you shampoo your hair?" " Did you rinse and repeat? Mr. Fung? 😅 Ahh 👆
ITO and FUNG completely threw off the Asian curve.
did this guy even have a career after this?!!! i feel bad for him
Yes, he retired from LAPD in 2015 as a Supervising Criminalist and has an annual pension of $80K per year.
California's Last Gasp was curious about that just never bothered googling it lol
Barry Scheck is a bad ass!!!!!
OJ is a killer
To those who sing praises for Sheck, watch his interview with Ezra Edelman on "Made in America". Gets very defensive and flustered. I am no expert, but no amount of his badgering Fung for days on end changes someone's DNA !
Or just watch the verdict
Yes, that’s exactly right. Thank you.
Cross contamination,you can have my blood with your DNA.
Did anyone claim DNA got changed in this trial other than yourself?
Cross contaminated yes changed i never heard.
@@lynndragoman1573 The best DNA man for OJ was not introduced.He made a 4 hr movie which showed how someone's blood with no DNA,could wind up with someone else's DNA.Clark fought it toothy and nail's.This movie was eventually aired on ID.
Barry Scheck kicked Mr Fung's ass
Scheck looks like a toddler wearing his dad's suit jacket. 90s fashion was something else, boy.
16:24 "The uhh gentlemen Jonathan FARTlow... (Judge Ito): thats Fairtlow " lmfao u know he said FARTlow on purpose
slamandjam2 thought the same thing😀😀
Prosecution tried to object his every word scheck said
Josh Fry that’s their job. Defense objected nearly 100 times during closing arguments.
Horrible Hank Goldberg was a young inexperienced lawyer but he knew the case was already over so he objected to anything said. He failed to understand his objections where telling the jury the lapd is hiding the truth.
53:20, Fung has been lying his ass off, they're watching the video frame by frame to see if he really did grab the envelope with his bare hands, when they get to the correct frame, the courtroom actually GASPS because he's been lying his ass off for an hour and was just exposed WORLD WIDE
Oh shut up!
why was he lying?
@@Resenbrink he was covering up mistakes made by the detectives and himself.
Watch at 9.45 through 10.15 and it will clearly show he was lying and had to change his testimony
@@lynndragoman2454 lying or mistaken? Was he charged with perjury?
@@Resenbrink I believe Mark Fuhrman was charged with perjury and nothing happened to him.
Vanatter was outed by the FBI special agent and nothing happened to him.
Looks to me like perjury is only enforced on everyday citizens and doesn't apply to LAPD?
To all you that say Barry Scheck won the case or F.Lee Bailey won the case. Neither would have been present without Bob Shipiro. Dont forget the hat demo from Johnny Cochran. It really was a dream team of lawyers
But discredit DNA is a cold mutha. But I agree
Shapiro also immediately made sure they had the best forensic experts plan to testify for them, which hugely helped their case.
Robert Shapiro got Barry scheck and Alan dershowitz to go out west with him to defend OJ. All are from NYC
Look at Marcia face 😂
When Fung gets so defensive around 46:50 -ish feeling sorry for him pretty much ends and we’re (most of “we’re”) are with Scheck when he takes off the gloves. (No pun intended in this particular case.) Had Fung just admitted the mistakes it would have been so much better, not just for him, but for the prosecution as a whole.
Fung was not prepared. The defense lawyers essentially put the prosecution on the defensive during their own case by in effect putting the LAPD on trial with extensive cross examination of every decision made. Scheck has quite enough experience with DNA evidence, and thoroughly picked him apart. By the end he must’ve just wanted to get out of there.
Ito seems pretty quick with the "Overruled" with Prosecution objections. There seems to be a bias there.
It was hard for me to follow the trail that day April 11th my mother just had passed away from a sudden heart attack at the hospital so I lost all focus on the trial that week.
randy brooks I am so Sorry for the loss of your Mom; may the Lord Jesus Cheust always give you and your Family Peace and Strength
@@melissaonorati2243 Thank u so much Melissa that was very kind of you thank u.
@@melissaonorati2243 :)
Love how people comment looking for sympathy for some unrelated story from the past.
Fung is such a liar! Marcia got rid of her Jheri curl. Way to go Marcia!
Lol...Lol stooopid
Fartlow. lolololollolol
Barry Scheck won this case for OJ. Johnny knows as soon as Barry says how bout THAT Mr. Fung that the case is over at that point!!! Barry is THE man!!!
maybe "THE MAN" will get your killer off, you can be murdered too, happens constantly for various reasons, people being killed
OJ did it though.
how many times did fung say "I recall" lmao
What about the right angle in Attorney Douglas head-shape?
All the DNA evidences were out of window as Barry Scheck kept his calm and keep making Fung take more and more time to answer simple questions or say don't recollect or denials of basic commen sense question. He came out as a liar on so many occasions. Case was half won during Fung testimony
1:09:16 [Scheck solemn and serious] “I’d like you to watch very carefully in the frame, these shoes... And so what you said before wasn’t true?”
I would really like to know the truth but he was found innocent.
if you watched the whole trial go look for the audio of oj's first interview with the police. you will get your answer
I know OJ a big guy but y'all saying he didn't have help? I mean no help?
Did Fung say "you won't find my finger prints on that FUCKING envelope" and they bleeped fucking out?
Who killed Ronald Goldmans room mate , Brett Cantor a year before Ron was killed. Brett was found stabbed many times. Who killed Ronald Goldman's other room mate also stabbed. Why did they never mention Ronald Goldman's criminal record.
😳😮
@@alonzowatson1754 IF YOU DID NOT WATCH THE TRIAL, YOU SHOULD NOT FORM AN OPINION ABOUT THIS COMPLEX CASE. THIS CASE IS TO COMPLEX FOR THE AVERAGE AMERICAN IMBECILE.
@@chuckfrost5624Not really all you needed to do was listen it did not need an Einstein brain to understand. I only went to high school in1960 but I understood it so dont be rude its not thatt complex
The prosecution was weak!
58:06 Yes he did. 😀😀
Dennis Fung probably still hates Barry Scheck to this very day.
🤣🤣
I wonder why the prosecution wouldn't have had that envelope fingerprinted in closed session to see if Fung's fingerprints were on it, likewise the defense if they were so sure
There are
at least two methods of lifting fingerprints from paper. The first
uses "rubber-gelatin lifters", which are suitable for textured
surfaces because of their thickness. The problem with paper is the
uneven surface - a fingerprint on paper becomes visible when brushed
with powder, but regular tape-lifters do not come in contact with the
powder that has landed in the deeper parts of the paper, and so the
lifted prints will be missing some details. Rubber-gelatin lifters are
thick and are able to get down into all the inner recesses and form a
sort of "cast" that can then be lifted off the paper as a whole. The
second method consists of fuming the prints with Cyanoacrylate (Super
Glue), dusting with powder, and then lifted using lifting tape.
Scheck was fabulous!!!!
Awful. One of the most obnoxious lawyers in history.
For all you prosecutors (and other lawyers) learn a lesson from this trial: don’t object just because you can. It makes you seem weak and petty. Juries don’t like it.
is it me or this fake fung sounds just like keanu reeves.this fung dude need to b hang from the ceiling for trying to stamp this crime on purpose on oj
You're an idiot.
Scheck is the most capable person in this whole trial.
Alexis Snyder I don’t like him....but you’re absolutely right. He is the most accomplished in the trial.
Just look at how he has changed the criminal justice system since. It’s breathtaking.
www.innocenceproject.org
the bigger suit and nerdy image was just a tactic to hide his strength as a lawyer. as a scientist I felt it closest to me
most capable...because he's loud?
@@tolstoyed loudest was kelberg
I always wondered if ito was controlling the camera.....
This is a little ridiculous (@ 1:15:00)......he's asking a field guy (like Fung) technical questions about DNA or the various tests. That's like asking a guy who puts new brake pads on your car if he knows the coefficient of friction between your brake pads and the rotor steel.
09rja that is a very good analogy
Poor analogy. Fung does work that will be used by DNA expects and so he needs to know technical info that will be useful to them. On the other hand the engineer who manufactures brake pads does not depend on the mechanic to be successful in his work. The flow of information is actually opposite for the professions.
eddie krausse Lol....calm down. You and I probably know more about DNA now, than Fung did back in 1994!
eddie krausse and...the engineer does rely on the mechanic to be successful in his work. If the brake pads are shite....the mechanic doesn’t use them. If the brake pads that are shite aren’t used by the mechanics because they turn to dust within a month.....the engineer doesn’t get paid. So to speak!
He asked him if he was trained in how to collect evidence that will be tested in the future to be tested for DNA . considering he is the one who is collecting all the evidence that they will test for DNA makes sense to me that he should properly know how to collect it and what and where it can be found !! He isnt asking him if he is the DNA expert just asking him if he was properly taught to do his job and u dont think that he should be knowledgeable in this area ???????
Lol So FasciNatingly Amazing What He did To this guys Creditability, And Integrity On this Trial !!! Wow ! All Of them ! and People wonder how it Took such a short period to A Verdict - Not Guilty!
that was brutal
36:35. “This was just a lttle bit altered?” Haha. Mr scheck. Youre a funny guy
Is Shrek wearing his grandfather's (the jolly green giant's) jacket? Mighty mouth needs to stop shouting with glee...
1:05:25
I feel for Fung, he has nothing between his ears.
😂 EVERY time.i hear Mr Fartlow
Marcia got her hair did 🤗👍❤
😂 you're a true stan
Did you Touch that Envelope with your Bare hands mr Fung ? Are you sure about that ? Yes ! Ahah - Right There!
Scheck. Owned Fung🙄😊he knew more about fung's job then Fung did
I did feel sorry for Dennis Fung, they all screwed themselves. Blue Wall of Silence.
geno007able 💯💯💯💯
he also made mistaked in handling the blood samples. cops and forensics were irresponsible
Didn't Fung get ANY coaching or witness prep by the Prosecution?
He did but it didn't work
Mr. Fung is in such a privileged position having a job that is both interesting, rewarding, and has such potential for growth. One would think he would show more enthusiasm, competence, and just outright give a shit about what he does for a living. This wasn't some fancy lawyer trick on display here. Scheck totally exposed this man for the dishonest incompetent that he is.
But that's all Scheck proved. The result still does change the fact that OJ's DNA was found at the crime scene. 1 and 170,000,000 accuracy or something like that? If the DNA became contaminated it would not have been able to be used as evidence. So in other words, the DNA at the crime scene was contaminated and the result was a match to OJ Simpson.? What do I know.?
OJ’s DNA was all over that place , he’d been there multiple times over a few years . This is what scheck is getting at , if they cross contamination the samples they collect it will get OJ’s DNA on it .
This is one 2 hour clip of a year long trial. For one, the defense doesn’t have to prove anything. They just have to create reasonable doubt. And for another, there are a ton of other parts in the trial where they explain what you’re looking for. They get several experts to explain what the cross-contamination would do as well as in closing statements, and how the mishandling of evidence made almost all of it unreliable.
Additionally, the contaminated stuff was absolutely allowed to be used as evidence, even some of the officers have admitted it was contaminated now, they just don’t think that matters.
how about that mr fung?
scheck made fung very uncomfortable as you can hear constantly sighing due the stress of being asked questions regarding his lack of knowledge required to collect evidence and contamination. i am stressed from watching this as I am sure that no one has ever questioned fung regarding how he did his job and his competence. fung probably had nightmares each night after his testimony
And having Dennis Fung testify is how you lose an airtight case.
Did Ito ever run out of time?
So, who killed them if not OJ? That's what I thought.
2 neighbors independently came forward after they saw four men running from the scene. Another neighbor saw NBS arguing with 2 men an hour before murders.
Dion Sanchez Jason Simpson. OJ hired. Lawyer for him as soon as he got home from Chicago. Why?Prosecutors never question him. He had motive means. And a history of mental illness and assault with knives.
@@marycrusco7131 No parent would ever take the rap for a DOUBLE MURDER that their child committed. What is wrong with you?
I agree juice did not commit this murder
da did not make the case the evidence was sloppy
Ain't no "FUNG" when the lawyers got the gun!
The "carner" that's so irritating.
I learned in high school about pcr and rflp in 92. a forensic expert should have known this three years later
He was a criminalist and only responsible for collecting evidence. He said he heard of PCR and RFLP and that’s all he needs to know.
Regardless of guilt or innocence.... everyone should lisfen to the MARK FUHRMAN TAPES.
There is alot he don't know. They should have started with what he does know
I work with blood sometimes and the way forensics, cops and lab technicians handled the crime scene was in itself criminal. irresponsible and unprofessional at best. if they had handled the blood analysis properly the results had been credible.
I love fung's snarky attitude towards scheck
Fung thought he was the smartest person in that room and then got completely shredded by Scheck.
He could not back it up. Scheck ripped him to shreds.
lol Fung was humiliated.
Long pauses equals short lies......
Alan dershowitz is so young
My standard answer would have been I'm not sure, and piss them off
Fung got busted here touching evidence with bare hands
Who's here during break of the Johnny Depp trial?
That’s what he gets for going there to lie
I noticed Marcia Clark’s haircut tho’…
Should have questioned the glove company asking them if o.j. was comped free gloves in and color and his size. No matter the color gloves it had all three blood samples on them ....guilty. what a scam this was.