ไม่สามารถเล่นวิดีโอนี้
ขออภัยในความไม่สะดวก

CJI To Hear Rahul Case? Lawyer Argues, Heated Exchange

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 มิ.ย. 2024
  • CJI To Hear Rahul Case? Lawyer Argues, Heated Exchange #lawchakra #supremecourtofindia #analysis
    Follow us on Twitter:- / lawchakra
    Follow us on Whatsapp : whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaP5...
    Visit Our Website:- lawchakra.in/
    Patna High Court Karnataka High Court Live Stream.
    #Patnahighcourt #SupremeCourtofIndia #Supremecourt
    Courtesy :- Supreme Court of India
    Books on Constitution:- amzn.to/3rqFpbh
    Tools Used for editing:- amzn.to/3EelR1r
    For business Enquiries:- enquire@lawchakra.in
    #SupremeCourt#Mussorrie #advocate #lawyer #legal #livehighcourt #indianlaw #law #live #court #argument #criminaljustice #guiltyminds #learnadvocacy #courtlive #justicelive #lawmotivation #beajudge #ias #judge #law #legal #patnahighcourt #justiceashutoshkumar #judiciary #motivation #learnlaw #IAS #supremecourtofindia #IPS #2022 #Patnahighcourtstream #orissahighcourt #SupremeCourt #Orissahighcourt#GujaratHighCourt
    #Law #Chakra#JusticeAshutoshkumar
    *This Video is strictly for Legal Awareness & Education Purpose only.📚
    🙏 Follow us on twitter, Instagram and facebook.
    @Lawchakra
    👉Twitter
    / lawchakra
    👉 Instagram.
    / lawchakra
    📑*Fair Use Policy -*
    Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the copyright act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use.

ความคิดเห็น • 491

  • @user-zt3mv9hl1h
    @user-zt3mv9hl1h หลายเดือนก่อน +105

    हज़ारो करोड़ के हेराल्ड के घोटाला मामले मे कुछ मिनिट मे ज़मानत और इसके आरोपी करीबन एक दशक से ज़मानत पर बाहर है. कौन इन अपराधीयों क़ो बचा रहा क्या न्यायपालिका जनता क़ो बयायेगी,.?

    • @jnthakur28H
      @jnthakur28H หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Yeh kathakathit nayaypal bike hue hain apni manmani karte rehenge.

    • @SM-uv9um
      @SM-uv9um หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Very surprising that BJB(NDA) is in power since last 10 years and it seems playing defensive against 🤚.🕉️🕉️🇮🇳🇮🇳

    • @jnthakur28H
      @jnthakur28H หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@SM-uv9um Kehne ke liye kuchh bhi kaha ja sakta hai BJP ko beshak dosh diya ja sakta hai. Jab cologims system par baat ho rahi thi to inhin so called bailjivion ne desh ke liye khatra bataya tha. Kiyonkeh inke upar nakel kasne ke liye koi bhi system nahin hai tahbi to yelog manmani karte hain. Inke chunav koi dakhal nahin de sakta kionkeh yeh log bhagwan se upar hain.

    • @sunnymitra6372
      @sunnymitra6372 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@SM-uv9umSarkar kisi ki bhi ho........System unka hai

    • @ramachandrahegde347
      @ramachandrahegde347 หลายเดือนก่อน

      British ka hath nyayalaya ko control karhahihai ho .usi taraha lagatahai

  • @KULKARNIVK-gb3wf
    @KULKARNIVK-gb3wf หลายเดือนก่อน +53

    How many decades it will take to decide the Rs 5000 crrore National Herald corruption case? People are on bail for many months n court is not at all taking up the case. Also Modi defamation case is also pending for so much time. SC is anwerable to such cases.

    • @aravamudhans5096
      @aravamudhans5096 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Judiciary is corrupt snd helpless

    • @omram777
      @omram777 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Very very lethargic....

    • @maadi77
      @maadi77 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      ​@@omram777nothing lethargic sir. It's deliberate and to the plan. The current CJI is a rajyasabha hopeful on Congress party ticket

    • @hummingleaves3120
      @hummingleaves3120 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What is that case? Selling share of their firm?Gujarat mafia would go first to jail for many scams and corruption,even their election win is based on Evm manipulation.

    • @dblingannaiahdbl823
      @dblingannaiahdbl823 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      SC should enquire and give the suitable judgement regarding PM care Fund and Party Fund.

  • @mtj9499
    @mtj9499 หลายเดือนก่อน +42

    Indian justice system is for rich and politicians

    • @rjndrjmrgpta14224
      @rjndrjmrgpta14224 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@mtj9499 जस्टिस सिस्टम अब ज़मानत सिस्टम बन चुका है l जब दंड संहिता थी तब न्याय नहीं था l अब न्याय संहिता आ गई है तो अन्याय होगा l

    • @mtj9499
      @mtj9499 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@rjndrjmrgpta14224 koi bhi system aye jananat aur jamanat amir aur desh premee netas ka liye hoga

  • @bipinnaik7538
    @bipinnaik7538 หลายเดือนก่อน +51

    Judiciary is only taking salary, doing nothing, huge monetary loss.

    • @meerabakshi2676
      @meerabakshi2676 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Oh no, they are doing great service to Italy bai, remaining faithful to her keeping eyes closed to all her black deeds against the Nation.

    • @jibankumarkonsam1819
      @jibankumarkonsam1819 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Andhbhakt 🤡🤡🤡 ​@@meerabakshi2676

    • @jibankumarkonsam1819
      @jibankumarkonsam1819 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@meerabakshi2676Andhbhakt

  • @battegovind
    @battegovind หลายเดือนก่อน +76

    Many say Rahul has British citizenship, these lawyers should seek help from some British lawyers and file case or get reports from Britain and show the proof

    • @YoKai11722
      @YoKai11722 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Augusta ke paper meloni mam ne modiji ko diya hein lekin oosko manmohan ne govt of indua kee taraf se close karne ko bolaa tha.
      British kitba helpful ye doubtful hein

    • @SV-cb6iy
      @SV-cb6iy หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I think lawyers are protecting him

    • @user-lk2nq9de5f
      @user-lk2nq9de5f หลายเดือนก่อน

      ए कोर्ट मामला हैं आप जाइये कोर्ट में .अपनी ओकात बतायें .

    • @jayant5601
      @jayant5601 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Relevant documents has already been collected submitted by Dr subrahmanyam Swami. It's central govt not acting properly.

    • @demolisher47
      @demolisher47 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

      British Government does not divulge any information regarding its citizens to any authority accept demanded by the courts of other country. Even then, it may , it may not divulge the information. Many British Citizens take advantage of this British Government position to escape the law of this country. Many British Citizens of Indian origin come to India for marriage and return back to UK promising to call the spouse to UK but never do so. When British Government is approached , it never help. No information is provided of the absconder. If anyone approach the UK Home Office it will never divulge the nationality of Rahul Gandhi even if he is actually the British Citizen except by the court through the government but here court seems is reluctant to do so.

  • @user-dp2bg9yh3n
    @user-dp2bg9yh3n หลายเดือนก่อน +32

    Action delayed by the govt doesn’t mean the case shouldn’t be heard. That was a wrong line of argument by the judge. Wonder why Rahul Gandhi had not replied to the query sent by the Home ministry.

    • @sriranga1000
      @sriranga1000 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      That is what Supreme Court did in the case of petition filed by Kashmiri pandits .Theywere willing to hear 1987 Sikh riots case but refused to hespar the petition filed Pandits about genocide of Hindus in 1990 saying it is an old case .How can 1987 case is new and 1990 case old only Supreme Court should explain

    • @MarimuthusankaraPandian-oy1yu
      @MarimuthusankaraPandian-oy1yu หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Follow up action to be taken immediately 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

    • @sriranga1000
      @sriranga1000 19 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Judiciary will not question Rahul for not sending rep,y to government’s queries but will pounce on government if they delay investigation.

  • @ashokanand5423
    @ashokanand5423 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    Why home ministry can't clarify??? Why Rahul Gandhi has not responded???? It seems no body is interested to do the things right and to tell the truth. Very sad.

    • @santa4091
      @santa4091 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ask Subramanian Swamy.

    • @mohandevidas
      @mohandevidas หลายเดือนก่อน

      BJP too is not interested. BJP & RSS have both turned a blind eye to the fact tat the Gandhi Vadra families are anti Sanatan.

    • @romeshwazir7763
      @romeshwazir7763 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Home ministry is not keen to find truth n justice keen only to retain gov. N rule

  • @Bakrolio
    @Bakrolio หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    Your judiciary system is so much broken and now public need to take it in their own hand.

    • @DilipKumar-zc1ns
      @DilipKumar-zc1ns หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hey Bakroli....Who are you Mr Mad to comment on our (Indian) judiciary system..

  • @sureshjain7830
    @sureshjain7830 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    मान्यवर, ब्रिटिश नागरिकता सत्यापित है तो उन्हें भारत की नागरिकता से वंचित करना चाहिए।

  • @vivekmane1534
    @vivekmane1534 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    मेरा ये केहना हैं देश मे इंदिराजी, राजीवजी, नेहरू जीं गुजरे हुवे अब 30 बरस हुवे लेकिन देश कि अदालत और देश ke सभी जज गांधी परिवार पर कानूनी करावाई IPC ke तेहत करने से डरते हैं. वॊ जज सिर्फ मिडल और गरीब आदमी कि जान ले सकते हैं ये असली डेमोक्रेसी नही हैं 😊

  • @yadagirigovula7256
    @yadagirigovula7256 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    We request the homeMINISTER to appoint to appoint fact finding committee to clear the doubts of the people who are eagerly waiting for fact to know and then submit the report to court for early orders

    • @akj10000
      @akj10000 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Apoint to appoint?

  • @sureshjain7830
    @sureshjain7830 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    बीजेपी से संबंधित व्यक्ति केस लड़ रहा है तो शंका की दृष्टि से क्यों देखा जा रहा है।

  • @ghanshyambuch8197
    @ghanshyambuch8197 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    The Hon judge should not have lost his patience and got up and. It seems Rahul Gandhi has deep roots in judiciary

  • @awadheshrai3782
    @awadheshrai3782 21 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    राहुल ईसाई के खिलाफ़ मुकदमा सुनने और न्याय करने का साहस आज की न्याय व्यवस्था में नहीं है

  • @donbon9770
    @donbon9770 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    Rahul must be having three Passports.
    Indian
    Italy
    British.
    As per Subramanyam Swamy and others.
    Why the present government is so lax in taking action on such high profile leaders, who are doing Anti India 🇮🇳, activities openly??.

  • @folksongs8686
    @folksongs8686 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    जजों की फटती है बड़े लोगों के प्रकरण में खासकर जो उनके अन्नदाता हों उनसे विशेष

  • @kvn251
    @kvn251 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Seems Home ministry had sent notice to Rahul 5 years back and has not responded till date. Does this not mean Rahul has accepted guilt by not replying.

    • @Anilan801
      @Anilan801 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Means ROUL WINCY have no respect to constitution.

  • @jaganmansingh1516
    @jaganmansingh1516 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    This pil will decide whether a non- indian citizen also can hold a ministerial post in India or not! This must be clear in our constitution by the court.

  • @Bejust389
    @Bejust389 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    This is EXTREMELY serious issue . Rahul Gandhi must be asked to present at court and accept he is British citizen or not

  • @jaganmansingh1516
    @jaganmansingh1516 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    HM must be in action to provide the evidences..

  • @rajmenon6727
    @rajmenon6727 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The point raised is valid, the citizenship issue is a serious matter and need to be legally sorted out for once for all as the individual is a member if the INDIAN parliament

  • @jithendramohanshetty8395
    @jithendramohanshetty8395 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    This is very important for country and its people. Tomorrow any body can say they are citizen of india and vote and obtain loan from bank and get pan. Adar etc being citizizen of other country. Matter has to be deceide by court and direct

  • @anandsodhani3048
    @anandsodhani3048 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Why British Govt not clear if Rahul Gandhi is their citizen or not.There is Embassy in New delhi even they can confirm this or not. iss hamam me sab chor hai!!

  • @sriramvenkatraman
    @sriramvenkatraman หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Every citizen should be a law-abiding person inside Bharat soil. Whoever crosses should face consequences, which is important, and then only fear factor will function

  • @vinayakrao2881
    @vinayakrao2881 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    If it’s true action has to be action. We Indians deserve the truth if Indians are being taken for a ride by foreign national!

  • @battegovind
    @battegovind หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    Yes, SC judges should do impartial judgments. Lawyer (liars) supporting criminals and opposition, these lawyers should be prosecuted as well.

    • @nssivaram1
      @nssivaram1 หลายเดือนก่อน

      WHAT ABOUT MODI ALWAYS LYING ONLY

  • @bhaskarcharkhe282
    @bhaskarcharkhe282 17 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    कोर्ट ने राहुलजी के विरोध में चल रहे केसेस में जल्द सुनावनी करनी चाहिए

  • @pawanloharuka363
    @pawanloharuka363 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    In my opinion, citizenship case is more important than jamanat case. National interest is involved.

  • @rajeshchopra1111
    @rajeshchopra1111 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    No no lawyer pandy is the right judge should listen to pandy seriously

  • @kulkarnivb2024
    @kulkarnivb2024 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Why is that CJI is more inteligent than other judges ? 😂😂

    • @kunalzshah
      @kunalzshah หลายเดือนก่อน

      hahahah that's why he is CJI I guess!!

    • @akash-yb5ds
      @akash-yb5ds หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      CJI ke pa bhi CJI hi the. Collegium system ki waje se CJI bane hai inteligent pe nahi.

    • @bhuveshgoyal8723
      @bhuveshgoyal8723 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Gulami tartar aaj bhi jinda hai

  • @saicapt9146
    @saicapt9146 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Judges should hear patienly everything and should not cut short based on temper or irrelevant counter. Matter is on valid citizenship. Interim directive to EC, Passport Office, British high commission, Hospital records etc should have been sought from approproate authorities within time frames as relevany evidence.

  • @pkm06
    @pkm06 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    Court has much time to hear the fabricated arguments of Kapil Sibal, singhbi and many more.

  • @ChandidasGhosh-id2qc
    @ChandidasGhosh-id2qc หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The court should consider the petition seriously, otherwise people in high positions shall get away even after committing wrongs

  • @mukhtiyarsingh9791
    @mukhtiyarsingh9791 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    सभी कानून गरीब जनता पर लागू होते हैं, पैसे वाले या रसूखदार पर लागू नहीं होते, गरीब जनता हर रोज टैक्स देती है,पर उस टैक्स पर सिर्फ अमीरों का कब्जा है

  • @vuchangisathyanarayana5788
    @vuchangisathyanarayana5788 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    It's a wonder as to why no body is ready to cause any verification wrt the members of a particular family for years.

  • @basudeonarayanprasad4709
    @basudeonarayanprasad4709 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Well done advocate Pandey, Congrats

  • @kannansankaranarayanan7148
    @kannansankaranarayanan7148 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This matter is of significant importance. The court should seek evidences, stance of the government agencies and settle the issue. If required, suo moto

  • @devendrajoshi957
    @devendrajoshi957 20 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    जब जज अपनी प्रतिबद्धता से बंधा हो तो न्याय हो ही नहीं सकता । यह एक सामान्य बात है ।यह बात एक शिक्षक पर भी लागू होती है जो किसी छात्र से या तो स्नेह करता है या चिढता है । इसका असर छात्र के परीक्षा परिणाम पर भी पड सकता है ।

  • @SP-kv4gy
    @SP-kv4gy หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Having a British national as MP now LOP is definitely a public interest litigation. How can a judge know the motives of the lawyer , are they competent to know what a person is thinking ? Does it matter that a petitioner belongs to some political party ?

    • @nssivaram1
      @nssivaram1 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ARE THE ECI IS A FOOL TO ALLOW RAHUL TO CONTEST AND YOU ARE A MOST INTELLIGENT TO FIND OUT A BIG TRUTH

  • @videshi2008
    @videshi2008 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Government of India should decide the citizenship issue at the earliest. It is an executive decision. Judiciary comes only after the government decides the issue as per law of the land.

  • @anikettripathi7991
    @anikettripathi7991 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Parliament, election commission and president has sufficient powers to take action on violating elections process. Courts wasn't required.

  • @basudebmohanta5699
    @basudebmohanta5699 20 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    सरकार किसिकी भी हो सिस्टम तो उनकी हाथ में है!😊

  • @sudhakarshah8292
    @sudhakarshah8292 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Why not ask Subramaniam Swami? He has evidence of RG’s citizenship.

    • @MarimuthusankaraPandian-oy1yu
      @MarimuthusankaraPandian-oy1yu หลายเดือนก่อน

      Citizen chep reference to be collected from Sri. Subramaniyaswamy
      Action to be taken immediately 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳

  • @sriranga1000
    @sriranga1000 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Why when it comes to cases against Gandhi family onlynCJI. Hears the case .what is the secret ?

  • @udayashankerprasad5726
    @udayashankerprasad5726 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Judge agar kisi khas ko bachane ki koshish kar rahe hain to kya kiya ja sakta hai.
    Lekin judge ka argument ki home ministry kyun delay ki koi justified nahin hai. 5 saal nahin hua to aab bhi nahin hoga aisa jaruri nahin hai.

  • @pareshdayah202
    @pareshdayah202 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Does India have a public protector (legal practitioner) who can investigate this matter and notify the petitioner and his legal representative. There are other avenues to obtain the original information required from a legal practitioner in the UK. Some maturity is required here.

  • @gautamguha7760
    @gautamguha7760 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Whatever happens in lower courts there is always protective cover in Supreme Court for elite and celebrities like Mamata, Rahul and likewise. For these people Supreme Court has seperate sets of rules to overule the lower courts judgements.

  • @vikrantinamdar2392
    @vikrantinamdar2392 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Being a highly technical matter, further deliberation is required and the issue should be put to rest with a vocal judgment in the matter.
    So the public at large will have a clear understanding of underlying facts.

  • @Nationatheart2023
    @Nationatheart2023 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    So rahul will esx cape again?

  • @kunalzshah
    @kunalzshah หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    This is a very serious matter. Shamefully, even the Govt is sitting quiet on this. If at all any information about the citizenship is brought to question, the Govt should immediately act upon it, and this includes Election Commission, Courts etc. Disallowing such a petition, or dissuading such a petition by imposing strictures on a petitioner is shameful, as is casting aspersions on the petitioner's intent. We have so many andolanjeevis regularly taking up the precious time of the Govt and administration, but no action is taken against them.

    • @GaneshSubramaniyan
      @GaneshSubramaniyan หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      When will we come out of the slavery mindset? Why so much importance is given to Rahul? Is he above the law? Is a very privileged citizen of India?!!! What kind of laws we have...pathetic and disappointing. Those who wear the black gown should feel ashamed of their conduct and comments. Looks like they are out to destroy the justice.

    • @KULKARNIVK-gb3wf
      @KULKARNIVK-gb3wf หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@GaneshSubramaniyanIn fact he himself should file an affidavit that he is not a British citizen. But he is not doing that!! Courts also not acting in a fair way. Judges becoming angry, doubting the intention of petitioners etc!

  • @RAJENDRA160660
    @RAJENDRA160660 21 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Who is petitioner or to which party he belongs is immaterial.... If PIL is relevant.... it is to b listened.... If not put a huge penalty to restrain PIL being filed to hv publicity or putting hurdles in public work....
    But only the matter pertains to Rahul Gandhi... shall not b refused to hear....

  • @user-xs7un8ec5j
    @user-xs7un8ec5j 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

    सबूत के साथ डिसीजन हो ताकि जनता को मालूम हो सके या फिर आगे से किसी की नागरिकता ना पूछीजाए

  • @heavenh2760
    @heavenh2760 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I totally agree with you

  • @ckdatta2383
    @ckdatta2383 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

    It's a very serious issue. Why people fear this question?

  • @ravinderpaljolly1920
    @ravinderpaljolly1920 หลายเดือนก่อน

    All d best ! For good news. !

  • @user-tt3gm6jr7d
    @user-tt3gm6jr7d หลายเดือนก่อน

    Controversial and the best for appex court decision for a reminder that showcases our Nation's leaders

  • @manveerrathi3441
    @manveerrathi3441 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    वाह कोर्ट वाह।देशहित में भी सुनेगे नहीं।

  • @RuleofLaw11
    @RuleofLaw11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    इस सवाल को लेकर चुनाव याचिका दाखिल होनी चाहिये,,,,,,
    यह सवाल PIL का नहीं हैं,,,,,,

  • @sadanandanvayalveetil7132
    @sadanandanvayalveetil7132 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Such an important matter is left half way through by the court. What a pity.

  • @dattatrayajoshi5551
    @dattatrayajoshi5551 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Common people of this country are loosing confidence in judiciary, because of this attitude of courts. Very sorry state of affairs.

  • @LimayeRahul
    @LimayeRahul หลายเดือนก่อน

    Entire judiciary system needs a revival .

  • @satyapalgupta6463
    @satyapalgupta6463 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Both the judges and accused will surely meet justice in the courts of God.

  • @amboursurendranath7661
    @amboursurendranath7661 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Citizens of India should come out of residences and block the roads in all cities. Then the courts will understand the might of the people and deliver the judgement immediately.

  • @manojbhavsar7346
    @manojbhavsar7346 หลายเดือนก่อน

    PLI is meant for Justice for people and to Nation, irrespective of the Motive.

  • @bshaamala
    @bshaamala 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Gone case in that case! He will do dandavath pranam and call him the most innocent and honest person on the planet!

  • @rjhaveri8bh
    @rjhaveri8bh หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Supreme court of India will not here this case you have to go to England to their masters to fight the case

  • @kalyanp5504
    @kalyanp5504 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Our HM has been sleeing on this subject for the last 10 years. Wonder for whose benefit!

  • @manojparija70
    @manojparija70 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Court should hear the petetion with patience before disgracing petetioner. There might be hiden truth awaiting to be surfaced.

  • @ramakrishnatumuluri8138
    @ramakrishnatumuluri8138 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Why SC does not ask Rahul /Advocate to give the SC RAHUL'S ANSWER TO THE THE QUESTION ? WHY HOME MINSTRY REMAINED SILENT FOR 5 YEARS . THE COUNTRY EXPECTS SC TO CLEAR ALL DOUBTS IN THE INTEREST OF RAHUL AND POLITICAL CLARITY

  • @bhuveshgoyal8723
    @bhuveshgoyal8723 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Judge was not impartial clearly evident

  • @bhaskaratrasi
    @bhaskaratrasi หลายเดือนก่อน

    In education system Bharatiya kanunu should be taught to every citizens. So that everyone can learn how approach court for justice.

  • @yadagirigovula7256
    @yadagirigovula7256 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why not hom MINISTER can kindly ask uk government to clarify. Ofcourse according to procedures.

  • @SV-cb6iy
    @SV-cb6iy หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Britain should be able to confirm his citizenship. Its all a nations most imp document. Why is so much back n forth happening in indian court. Govt can request uk to confirm it. Cant they? Request those who are in this field if expertise respond

  • @srinivasanr1565
    @srinivasanr1565 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Such is the power of ecosystem......

  • @jitenchandarana1357
    @jitenchandarana1357 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can Rahul’s British citizenship not be checked with the British authorities? Surely the British high commission can get the answer…. He may or may not be a British citizen

  • @ashwinisaini9862
    @ashwinisaini9862 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

    जनता जान ना चाहती है कि राहुल और सोनिया के केसों की सुनवाई कयो नही हो रही है

  • @jollyghosh2239
    @jollyghosh2239 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The Union Home Ministry, I think is empowered to declare whether Rahul Gandhi is an Indian citizen or not. If such a stand had been taken by the Home Ministry, the onus of proving his Indian citizenship would have been Rahul's.

  • @sriranga1000
    @sriranga1000 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

    No one has confidence on our judiciary especially their decisions on Gandhi family.

  • @pbalinki
    @pbalinki หลายเดือนก่อน

    Dear Sir, May I ask why Mr Rahul Gandhi doesn't file a libel suit against Dr Subramanian Swamy? Truly, SC Panda

  • @zariramaria805
    @zariramaria805 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Dr. Subramanian Swamy has openly said that Rahul Gandhi has dual citizenship and that the government should impound his Indian passport.

  • @jaswantsinghchauhan1909
    @jaswantsinghchauhan1909 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Is it happening when modi ji nd shah ji in govt very sad

  • @amritbodh126
    @amritbodh126 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Question is why rahul is not answering moh queries and why moh is keeping quiet . Pil may be politically motivated yet rahul's membership is not unquestionable .

  • @jayaramchakravarthi8659
    @jayaramchakravarthi8659 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is important issue, unfortunately it doesn't move. Simple case dragged for years because of inefficiency of government and courts

  • @donbon9770
    @donbon9770 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This issue, of Rahul G, or Raul V should be examined as one person; not two passport owners !!

  • @Ekbhaskaran
    @Ekbhaskaran 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Common man in this country is helpless unless judges and courts act wisely

  • @skg0490
    @skg0490 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Rahul should clear himself, about his british citizenship.. people want to hear from him.

  • @surendrabarsode972
    @surendrabarsode972 หลายเดือนก่อน

    1. The petitioner is incompetent. 2. SC Judge should not get emotionally upset like this. He should have dealt with the situation with required gravitas. 3. PIL has become a joke now. Every PIL must be file with some minimum cost like 5 lacs rupees which may be reduced or waived if judges considers it so. No PIL should be taken up so quickly without minimum cool off period.

  • @dharmpal8092
    @dharmpal8092 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We think the most difficult work in this world is debate with a half mad person in the parliament.
    May our Modi Ji live long and always win. Jai Hind.

  • @ramkishanlaljaganathan7876
    @ramkishanlaljaganathan7876 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

    If Rahul is having twin citizenship
    What the hell MHA MEA doing??

  • @vinayakpai3617
    @vinayakpai3617 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How RG was allowed to contest parliamentary election as a British citizen

  • @madhukarkulkarni7234
    @madhukarkulkarni7234 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Pl dont delay hearing of high profile cases of politician. Hope, Guarantee for Vote in 2024 election must be expedited and the decision must come in 6 months time

  • @shbharucha4509
    @shbharucha4509 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good that the lawyer was put in his place by the judge.

  • @mvkantharaju4690
    @mvkantharaju4690 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why the home ministry has not taken action on Rahul Gandhi's British citizen case despite the fact that they have documentary proof and ensures that he is disqualified ? ..and I always wonder whether laws of land are made only to screw the common man's interest and not rich and politically influenced people ..😮

  • @TheHemantShah
    @TheHemantShah 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Why can't the government get needed documents and then approach the courts

  • @pradipnawathe9713
    @pradipnawathe9713 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It alpears that BJP Govt is not keen on taking harsh steps against Gandhis and SC is hell bent in saving the Gandhies by staying their cases infinitely....

  • @pankajpatel-uo3tm
    @pankajpatel-uo3tm หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why is the judiciary refusing to act in this matter which is serious. Does finances have anything to do with it?

  • @KapilKumar-sr3pg
    @KapilKumar-sr3pg หลายเดือนก่อน

    It is a serious matter of National Security. If he is not a Citizen .......The threat perception is very high as he is a potential PM candidate .

    • @silvershot89
      @silvershot89 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Exactly this government is so impotent that they have let a foreign element become a LOP shame on such government and shame on such PM HM.

  • @balum5449
    @balum5449 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why special consideration for sonia family, rhey should be treated ordinary criminal and justice rendered. Are courts arefearing for Raghul.

  • @NarendraKumar-jj4fu
    @NarendraKumar-jj4fu 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The justice in this case is full of horse feathers.

  • @rathindralaldam4814
    @rathindralaldam4814 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wish our judiciary completes & brings verdicts within some limited-time & don't linger cases for infinity.