Your videos are entertaining, comprehensible and very educational / informative. Please do not stop making them, you are an invaluable resource for any philosophy student.
thank you very much for your very inspiring comments, Geddes570. yes, we will continue to make videos in philosophy. more videos are coming soon. cheers!
Because the X is on the line of 1 and 4 of M and P, it can't be determined which of the two the X is in. It may be undefined. You can't have 2 X's. That makes it invalid since it's not sure if it's 1 or 4. I hope that makes sense.
Can anyone help me with this? since I'm having a hard time with this and hoping for an explanation. No P is M Some S is M So, Some S is not P. EIO-2. I know that this is valid since I was using the moods and figures but I am still confused with the Venn Diagram on how I can plot this.
In my video «09-02. Расчёт силлогизмов модусов АIх, AOx, IAx, OAx… / РАЗГАДКА «Бермyдских треугoльников» ЛОГИКИ-2 / Calculation of syllogisms of modes АIх, AOx, IAx, OAx... / SOLVING THE "Bermuda Triangles" OF LOGIC-2»: th-cam.com/video/9-aWMfCIgk4/w-d-xo.html I used print-screen(s) from yours video. Thank you!
Your videos are entertaining, comprehensible and very educational / informative. Please do not stop making them, you are an invaluable resource for any philosophy student.
thank you very much for your very inspiring comments, Geddes570. yes, we will continue to make videos in philosophy. more videos are coming soon. cheers!
I didn't understand how the 3rd example was invalid, the explanation is not enough 😭
Because the X is on the line of 1 and 4 of M and P, it can't be determined which of the two the X is in. It may be undefined. You can't have 2 X's. That makes it invalid since it's not sure if it's 1 or 4. I hope that makes sense.
Excellent grounding for Finite Mathematics, Discrete Mathematics and Abstract Algebra.
very clearly explained .Thanks a ton
Got confused with the numbering.
LOL!
Yet, another great video!
thanks heaps, Pakistan Army Songs PCG.
Can anyone help me with this? since I'm having a hard time with this and hoping for an explanation.
No P is M
Some S is M
So, Some S is not P.
EIO-2. I know that this is valid since I was using the moods and figures but I am still confused with the Venn Diagram on how I can plot this.
Best of the best. It’s comprehensive
Thank you!
Nice explanation 👍
Thanks, Vishal. Cheers!
Very good
Thanks heaps @Qazi Farmanullah!
Hey can you help me with a Phil question?
We will try our best, if we have!
This video helps me alot!!
Tnx🙌
Glad it helped!
Thank you soo much.
No worries, Zeynep. Best wishes!
Excellent!
Thank you! Cheers!
Awsome
Many thanks, Shamshur. Cheers!
In my video «09-02. Расчёт силлогизмов модусов АIх, AOx, IAx, OAx… / РАЗГАДКА «Бермyдских треугoльников» ЛОГИКИ-2 / Calculation of syllogisms of modes АIх, AOx, IAx, OAx... / SOLVING THE "Bermuda Triangles" OF LOGIC-2»: th-cam.com/video/9-aWMfCIgk4/w-d-xo.html I used print-screen(s) from yours video. Thank you!