Intro to the Normal Distribution and how to Calculate Probability

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 มิ.ย. 2024
  • Learn all about the normal distribution including the mean and standard deviation, and then how to use those 2 parameters to calculate probability using the Z-transformation.
    0:27 - Introduction to the Normal Distribution
    1:40 - Understanding the Mean Value (parameter #1)
    2:58 - Explaining Standard Deviation (parameter #2)
    4:17 - Calculating Probability using the Z-Transformation (Example)
    7:55 - Common Z-Scores and Probability using the Normal Probability Table
    Learn More at www.CQEAcademy.com
    Get a free course on the Top 10 Topics on the CQE Exam:
    www.CQEAcademy.com/freecourse

ความคิดเห็น • 43

  • @joub5
    @joub5 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You really brooked this down to a level where I could see how it all worked and came together. Thank you.

  • @haou129
    @haou129 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Man. you are the best when it come to explaining things. Thank you very much

    • @CQEAcademy
      @CQEAcademy  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks!!!!
      I enjoy teaching, and I especially enjoy helping people like you learn and grow!

  • @uthirapathi4453
    @uthirapathi4453 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You've enabled my brain to understand the logic without memorizing ❤️

  • @nicolasbarceloni3861
    @nicolasbarceloni3861 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I am prepping for my first Quality Engineer job position. Your videos have been super helpful and clear! Really appreciate the help!

    • @CQEAcademy
      @CQEAcademy  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hey Nicolas, thanks for the feedback, I'm glad you're enjoying the videos!!!

  • @karlayanezsabido6227
    @karlayanezsabido6227 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I have to mention that your videos really explains how to get the Z value thanks

    • @CQEAcademy
      @CQEAcademy  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Awesome, thanks Karla!!

  • @omid4380
    @omid4380 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Perfectly explained! Thanks a billion.

  • @airlanggak5391
    @airlanggak5391 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    really appreciate your efforts! thanks so much!

    • @CQEAcademy
      @CQEAcademy  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Glad you like them!

  • @aruljoseph6894
    @aruljoseph6894 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks for your detailed video clip!!

    • @CQEAcademy
      @CQEAcademy  ปีที่แล้ว

      You're welcome Arul!

  • @JasonStern1
    @JasonStern1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Excellent. Excellent. Excellent.

  • @jagdishbhatt2788
    @jagdishbhatt2788 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    awesome presentation

    • @CQEAcademy
      @CQEAcademy  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks Jagdish, i appreciate the compliment!

  • @essqa226
    @essqa226 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    APPRECIATE IT

  • @garima1928
    @garima1928 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Best explained. 😀

  • @josephmarshallandrada5404
    @josephmarshallandrada5404 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you sir

  • @karlayanezsabido6227
    @karlayanezsabido6227 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks great refresh any six sigma book you recommend for someone who wants to get green belt certification

    • @davechennault8968
      @davechennault8968 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lean Six Sigma Pocket Toolbox by Michael George is a good cost effective start. Doesn't go too deep but gives a decent overview and reasonable detail on on a lot of topics.

  • @thamizhan2009
    @thamizhan2009 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    if you have a narrow range of tolerance and if the part dimensions are on the maximum side of specificaiton how could you maintain the cpk value greater than 2

    • @CQEAcademy
      @CQEAcademy  ปีที่แล้ว

      Hey there! Okay, so the first thing I would do is to try and move the dimension away from the maximum side of the specification. Centering up your dimension in between your tolerances will improve capability, and then the next thing I would do is to reduce the natural process variation for that component. To be honest, a CPK greater than 2, is hard to achieve, so best of luck!

  • @felixmutandi4753
    @felixmutandi4753 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello Andy, thanks for sharing, i would like if you can explain to us if on the same question (6:24) the question is what percentage of test takers gets a score more than 73 and 84?

    • @CQEAcademy
      @CQEAcademy  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hey Felix! Do you mean between 73 and 84?
      A score greater than 73 would be 93.3%.
      A score greater than 84% would be 37.1%

    • @felixmutandi4753
      @felixmutandi4753 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      thanks @@CQEAcademy

    • @CQEAcademy
      @CQEAcademy  ปีที่แล้ว

      @@felixmutandi4753 You're welcome!

  • @vivicristina5304
    @vivicristina5304 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Top

  • @richardlim6436
    @richardlim6436 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    🙏🏻👍🏻

    • @CQEAcademy
      @CQEAcademy  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Richard!!!
      Glad you like it!!
      -Andy

  • @leoeveee
    @leoeveee 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Isn't it 6 positive st. dev on right and 6 negative on left rather than 3 left and right?

    • @andyrobertson566
      @andyrobertson566 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hey There, can you clarify your question?
      Is there a timestamp in the video that you're thinking about?

    • @leoeveee
      @leoeveee 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@andyrobertson566 At 8:17, when we are talking about +/- std dev, I understand, in actual it is 6 S.D on right and 6 on left, not 3 on either side.

    • @andyrobertson566
      @andyrobertson566 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Hey @@leoeveee , I think you might be confusing probability with six sigma.
      So when you achieve a six sigma process, you capture +/- 6standard deviations on either side of the mean, and this captures like 99.999997% of the distribution.
      In that example at 8:17, I'm simply using the normal probability tables at +/- 3 standard deviations, which captures 99.7% of the distribution.

    • @leoeveee
      @leoeveee 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@andyrobertson566 Thanks for explaining. Love your videos!

  • @MS-be9wv
    @MS-be9wv ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i like ur video and presenting but I do not get the smooth flow of information that I got fron ur video about reliability

    • @CQEAcademy
      @CQEAcademy  ปีที่แล้ว

      Hey There!!!
      That's honestly some fair and constructive feedback! This is a relatively older video of mine, and over time I"ve improved my delivery when training, and at some point I should probably re-shoot these lectures so that they better reflect my training skills

    • @MS-be9wv
      @MS-be9wv ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@CQEAcademy really you are prefect trainer, and it will be sooo helpful if you make a content from the beginning, the history of the statistics and the need for each distribution and probability method, because you are one of those who have an amazing mind to speak up about these, not just mentioned the method with examples without how

    • @CQEAcademy
      @CQEAcademy  ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MS-be9wv Thanks so much, I appreciate that feedback, and honestly, that's exactly what my course, The CQE Master Class, (cqeacademy.teachable.com/p/cqe-certification-in-6-months) is all about!
      I cover all of the aspects of the entire CQE body of knowledge from start to finish!

    • @CQEAcademy
      @CQEAcademy  ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MS-be9wv Thanks so much for that awesome feedback, and to be honest, that's what my course, The CQE Master Class (cqeacademy.teachable.com/p/cqe-certification-in-6-months), is all about. We cover every single topic in the CQE Body of knowledge from start to finish!

  • @papichapo4939
    @papichapo4939 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Im getting a psycology degree... Why math? Brain don't math. Brain talk to people. Talk good.