If The Future is Wild had a reboot, I’d love to see more creatures that would live in the places shown in the first documentary series, than just three or four.
I like the Snowstalker the most. It’s a future ice age equivalent of a Smilodon, only it’s a wolverine descendant instead of a cat. Also with saber-teeth, why couldn’t the Snowstalker pounce on prey and target the throat? That way the canines slice through the throat and crush the windpipe. That’s how many saber-toothed cats like Smilodon killed their prey.
It's a very, very godd video that we have here! Really, sorry I didn't comment on the first episode, I was behind on other things, but the second is like the first, except for adding the animal reviews on their credibility to the end. Already, it's done well, and the videos and presentations of each species (photos, sizes in relation to humans and extracts from videos or documentaries in question towards the end of each segment) are always the same as in all the other videos. It's good, it's clear, precise and we don't get lost at all. Really, never change that. - The presentation of the context and the landscapes at the beginning is, like in the other videos, just as good (Ah! Also, I hope you will not forget and that you will also present the plants of the future presented in the show. are not numerous but are closely related to the animals of the future, so they are also very interesting and thought as a whole). - The addition of the section on people's reviews of animals is also welcome for several reasons. It is also important to show how the result was received in order to show the credibility of the things presented. Afterwards, even if certain arguments such as the presence despite everything of animals of other orders already occupying the same ecological niche or the time of evolution to drastically change form and habitube are indeed good arguments. against what has been presented, evolution has shown us several times in real life that it is quite possible. For example, mammals have evolved rapidly and incredibly from the second dinosaurs disappeared. From the Paleogene and the Eocene, we had miniature nail horses (Hyracotherium), four-legged whales resembling crocodiles (Ambulocetus, Pakicetus), predatory predatory carnivorous duck birds (Gastornis, which is not related to the other Terror Birds), Land Crocodiles, Lemurs and First Primates / Monkeys, and really other amazingly loads of other big and small animals. Personally, the negatives points and that, for example, it is at times a little "Quick" and that we speak or go directly to one subject to another. - Already, there is no starting credits. A credits, not even long, would be welcome to start each episode. Put in the title as well as clearly in the video the time (there are three in the universe that are shown) during which each episode takes place so that we can clearly understand that several episodes are situated at the same time time during the same period of time. You could use a timeline! On the other hand, you could also have presented the concept of the universe of the series a little better (like what is it, what is it about, how they do it etc ... that kind of question) ! You would have done that from the first episode by the way !! - The only other negative popint in my opinion is the mention at the end that all the animals presented extinguish with the recall of the end of the period and context in question in which they live. Personally, I find that a badant and a little pejorative. We already know this and it goes so far as to go without saying that it is useless to mention this fact. Moreover, you don't have to remember this fact every time in each video.In fact, as said above with the timeline and the period presentation context and all that, you start a period by presenting its set-up, its context, you make several videos showing and explaining the animals and landscapes of every corner of the world of the time period in question, then at the end of the last part dealing with the last biome of the time period, there and only there, you present its disappearance and the causes of its disappear. It's better, it's clearer and more precise and we find our way around. Especially since you never did that before mentioning and repeating that the animals you present disappear at the end. So there you have it, it's personal but I think many will agree with me. Apart from that, that and it's good work and good videos.
Sorry you didn't like the extinction parts, I think it was interesting to talk about the end of these periods, species aren't eternal and their end is a part of their history! Yes I talk about some plants like the lichen trees. I think you'll mostly enjoy my other series about Darwin IV and its weird wildlife life that is coming soon
@@Anthönypain Ok, it's fine. But it's si logical for us that is not really nessesary. Hey, but you has use already some images of the original Book from the documentary was create some years ago for old personnals videos who already speaking about speculative evolution.
You need to do a speculative evolution about Antarctica if it never got frozen. Antarctica had native animals before the great freeze and it was connected to S.America and Australia around 35 to 34 millions year ago.
Pakicetus: ~56mya Basilosaurus: ~41mya So 15my just about. A lot longer than 5my but not 'dozens or even hundreds' either. I think the whole question presumes a sort of fixed rate that a species should be able to move between phenotypes or body plans, or that evolution is always dependably 'going somewhere'. Even the molecular clock has to be calibrated differently between clades iirc so I think in this case at least it's a bit more up in the air haha
Maybe, but remember, whales and seals came from quadrupedal animals with different hand anatomy from birds which are bipedal. So chances are, it would take longer for birds to evolve into a seal-like form. I think the birds more likely to evolve into that form would be penguins because they seem to use their all 4 limbs when moving on land more.
@@ryanchen1819 Truuuu But esp. with penguins for instance Waimanu pops up 60-61mya, but it's also a bit of a tossup, like let's say for instance the cooling/drying we see at that time just absolutely decimates the south pole also: or maybe the gannets just take up the niche of the great Auk - remember there are no penguins in the north - and then transition into the gannet-whale. It's all v interesting to think about.
《::SCVNTHORPE::》 I meant if the gannet whale live elsewhere. If it’s evolved from actual gannets then the process to evolve a seal-like body shape would take longer.
@@ryanchen1819 Yeah, it’s much more likely for gannets to evolve into a large, penguin-like bird. Becoming the new “Penguins of the North” after the extinction of the great auk (Which ironically, penguins were named after)
I feel like Boars would have been very successful in this 5 million year Era, since being omnivores and have very few predators. They'd Hypothetically evolve into many different variants. Some could be very large grazers or aggressive scavengers.
I like that we also have criticism at the end (I think it should be in the first episode too). I believe that Future is wild has squandered its potential to be the best spce evo because of all the scientific mistakes it has. Out of 12 episodes, only one (The Vanished Sea) has no anatomical errors, the stupid desire of the creators to murder as many animals as possible or to ignore the biological limitations of organisms.
A youtuber name Sa1em's Hobby is stealing your videos and claiming them to be his. He has already stolen 5 of your videos. Each with different thumbnail.
If The Future is Wild had a reboot, I’d love to see more creatures that would live in the places shown in the first documentary series, than just three or four.
Same
I'm so glad I discovered this channel 🙌 these video topics are 👌👌👌 and the future is wild was a great documentary
Snowstalker are adorable.
And are accurate (i love accurate stuff)
@@crabman8264 Me too.
@@SunSheepOfLight ee3ewe we re there 4x cassette
@@kingpest13 😕
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
The snowstalker is like a badger and a wolverine
The shagrat is like a bison and a musk ox
I like the Snowstalker the most. It’s a future ice age equivalent of a Smilodon, only it’s a wolverine descendant instead of a cat. Also with saber-teeth, why couldn’t the Snowstalker pounce on prey and target the throat? That way the canines slice through the throat and crush the windpipe. That’s how many saber-toothed cats like Smilodon killed their prey.
Great video. Loved the critism at the end!
It's a very, very godd video that we have here!
Really, sorry I didn't comment on the first episode, I was behind on other things, but the second is like the first, except for adding the animal reviews on their credibility to the end.
Already, it's done well, and the videos and presentations of each species (photos, sizes in relation to humans and extracts from videos or documentaries in question towards the end of each segment) are always the same as in all the other videos. It's good, it's clear, precise and we don't get lost at all. Really, never change that.
- The presentation of the context and the landscapes at the beginning is, like in the other videos, just as good (Ah! Also, I hope you will not forget and that you will also present the plants of the future presented in the show. are not numerous but are closely related to the animals of the future, so they are also very interesting and thought as a whole).
- The addition of the section on people's reviews of animals is also welcome for several reasons. It is also important to show how the result was received in order to show the credibility of the things presented. Afterwards, even if certain arguments such as the presence despite everything of animals of other orders already occupying the same ecological niche or the time of evolution to drastically change form and habitube are indeed good arguments. against what has been presented, evolution has shown us several times in real life that it is quite possible. For example, mammals have evolved rapidly and incredibly from the second dinosaurs disappeared. From the Paleogene and the Eocene, we had miniature nail horses (Hyracotherium), four-legged whales resembling crocodiles (Ambulocetus, Pakicetus), predatory predatory carnivorous duck birds (Gastornis, which is not related to the other Terror Birds), Land Crocodiles, Lemurs and First Primates / Monkeys, and really other amazingly loads of other big and small animals.
Personally, the negatives points and that, for example, it is at times a little "Quick" and that we speak or go directly to one subject to another.
- Already, there is no starting credits. A credits, not even long, would be welcome to start each episode. Put in the title as well as clearly in the video the time (there are three in the universe that are shown) during which each episode takes place so that we can clearly understand that several episodes are situated at the same time time during the same period of time. You could use a timeline!
On the other hand, you could also have presented the concept of the universe of the series a little better (like what is it, what is it about, how they do it etc ... that kind of question) ! You would have done that from the first episode by the way !!
- The only other negative popint in my opinion is the mention at the end that all the animals presented extinguish with the recall of the end of the period and context in question in which they live. Personally, I find that a badant and a little pejorative. We already know this and it goes so far as to go without saying that it is useless to mention this fact. Moreover, you don't have to remember this fact every time in each video.In fact, as said above with the timeline and the period presentation context and all that, you start a period by presenting its set-up, its context, you make several videos showing and explaining the animals and landscapes of every corner of the world of the time period in question, then at the end of the last part dealing with the last biome of the time period, there and only there, you present its disappearance and the causes of its disappear. It's better, it's clearer and more precise and we find our way around. Especially since you never did that before mentioning and repeating that the animals you present disappear at the end.
So there you have it, it's personal but I think many will agree with me. Apart from that, that and it's good work and good videos.
Sorry you didn't like the extinction parts, I think it was interesting to talk about the end of these periods, species aren't eternal and their end is a part of their history!
Yes I talk about some plants like the lichen trees.
I think you'll mostly enjoy my other series about Darwin IV and its weird wildlife life that is coming soon
@@Anthönypain Ok, it's fine. But it's si logical for us that is not really nessesary. Hey, but you has use already some images of the original Book from the documentary was create some years ago for old personnals videos who already speaking about speculative evolution.
Yes that's right I love Wayne Barlowe arts (all his paintings) but I didn't know I'll talk about his book later
@@Anthönypain Me too i love very much these illustrations. Ahhh, the Destiny, this hasardious thing.
You need to do a speculative evolution about Antarctica if it never got frozen. Antarctica had native animals before the great freeze and it was connected to S.America and Australia around 35 to 34 millions year ago.
About You
The gannetwhale is like a gannet and a fur seal
I love this videos
Pakicetus: ~56mya
Basilosaurus: ~41mya
So 15my just about.
A lot longer than 5my but not 'dozens or even hundreds' either. I think the whole question presumes a sort of fixed rate that a species should be able to move between phenotypes or body plans, or that evolution is always dependably 'going somewhere'.
Even the molecular clock has to be calibrated differently between clades iirc so I think in this case at least it's a bit more up in the air haha
Maybe, but remember, whales and seals came from quadrupedal animals with different hand anatomy from birds which are bipedal. So chances are, it would take longer for birds to evolve into a seal-like form. I think the birds more likely to evolve into that form would be penguins because they seem to use their all 4 limbs when moving on land more.
@@ryanchen1819 Truuuu
But esp. with penguins for instance Waimanu pops up 60-61mya, but it's also a bit of a tossup, like let's say for instance the cooling/drying we see at that time just absolutely decimates the south pole also: or maybe the gannets just take up the niche of the great Auk - remember there are no penguins in the north - and then transition into the gannet-whale.
It's all v interesting to think about.
《::SCVNTHORPE::》 I meant if the gannet whale live elsewhere. If it’s evolved from actual gannets then the process to evolve a seal-like body shape would take longer.
@@ryanchen1819
Yeah, it’s much more likely for gannets to evolve into a large, penguin-like bird.
Becoming the new “Penguins of the North” after the extinction of the great auk
(Which ironically, penguins were named after)
Nobody:
The Future Is Wild: _Reject Humanity. Become _*_S Q U I M B D._*
Just saying but I can’t wait to see the video on the animals of what was once the Mediterranean Sea
Your gannet whale section sounds like your TTS is having a stroke
That what I was think
make more speculatives evolution please
I have a feeling that Dougal Dixon have seen the future.
I feel like Boars would have been very successful in this 5 million year Era, since being omnivores and have very few predators. They'd Hypothetically evolve into many different variants. Some could be very large grazers or aggressive scavengers.
Speculative Evolution Animals and Nature of Skull island and World of the kong
I like that we also have criticism at the end (I think it should be in the first episode too).
I believe that Future is wild has squandered its potential to be the best spce evo because of all the scientific mistakes it has. Out of 12 episodes, only one (The Vanished Sea) has no anatomical errors, the stupid desire of the creators to murder as many animals as possible or to ignore the biological limitations of organisms.
If future is wild
A youtuber name Sa1em's Hobby is stealing your videos and claiming them to be his. He has already stolen 5 of your videos. Each with different thumbnail.
I wonder if he can do monster hunter monsters for the monster hunter fans to watch that would be fun
Please, don't delate this series
Donc on a : des marmoutons, des carcajou à dents de sabre et des phoques-cormorans...
Darwin, un petit commentaire ?!
Whhhhhhhhhhooooooaaa?
Ooook.
The future Ice age what happened to Other predators and ungulates with humans too.
3.
Speculative Evolution make me thinking of something equivalent to the garbage because it's not even taken seriously.
Fuck off fuck offf fffffffffffffffuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuccccccccccccckkkkkkkkkkkkk oooooooooooooofffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
@@edwawasicencemichaelbooe6168 It's my opinion.
@@fanaticbuster8856 oh I thought u believed in God
@@edwawasicencemichaelbooe6168????
@@fanaticbuster8856 what?????
Creature: Exists
It's a RAT