The beauty of complex numbers

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 พ.ย. 2019
  • Sign up with brilliant and get 20% off your annual subscription: brilliant.org/MajorPrep/
    STEMerch Store: stemerch.com/
    Support the Channel: / zachstar
    PayPal(one time donation): www.paypal.me/ZachStarYT
    This video covers complex numbers, euler's formula, fractals, and more of the mechanics of complex numbers.
    Desmos Graphing Calculator (Software used in this video): www.desmos.com/calculator
    Instagram: / zachstar
    Twitter: / imzachstar
    Join Facebook Group: / majorprep
    Proof of Euler's Theorem: • The Real World Uses of...
    Jullia Set Generator: www.malinc.se/m/JuliaSets.php
    Animations: Brainup Studios (brainupstudios.com)
    ►My Setup:
    Space Pictures: amzn.to/2CC4Kqj
    Magnetic Floating Globe: amzn.to/2VgPdn0
    Camera: amzn.to/2RivYu5
    Mic: amzn.to/2BLBkEj
    Tripod: amzn.to/2RgMTNL
    Equilibrium Tube: amzn.to/2SowDrh
    ►Check out the MajorPrep Amazon Store: www.amazon.com/shop/zachstar

ความคิดเห็น • 265

  • @zachstar
    @zachstar  4 ปีที่แล้ว +141

    I wasn't concerned with this terminology in the video but note that technically the 'julia set' is the boundary of what was seen here (the fractal part or in one case the circle), while the internal points (the one's that don't diverge) are part of the 'filled Julia set'.
    Also I took the difficulty down on this video compared to recent one's but the follow up will focus on applications and that will be more advanced (mainly about control systems and nyquist stability). The geometric intuition of laplace/fourier will be after that.

    • @ir2001
      @ir2001 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Keep up the great work 👍🏼

    • @moped_265
      @moped_265 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      How is this comment pi days old?

    • @m.cfilis8065
      @m.cfilis8065 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I already saw your video. Oops sorry it was done by someone else th-cam.com/video/Y4ICbYtBGzA/w-d-xo.html

    • @XxfishpastexX
      @XxfishpastexX 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Nice! Looking forward to the Laplace/Fourier video!

    • @liavofra
      @liavofra 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Actually found out that if you put pictures of Julia set next to each other, guess what you'll see?
      th-cam.com/video/JuyPwwG-Cr8/w-d-xo.html

  • @keremkelleboz6959
    @keremkelleboz6959 4 ปีที่แล้ว +211

    Fun Fact: Some those weird looking Julia sets were originally calculated by hand

    • @louisrobitaille5810
      @louisrobitaille5810 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Fun fact: things were calculated by hand before computers were invented 🤡

    • @user-hb5ly5qy2o
      @user-hb5ly5qy2o 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@louisrobitaille5810no need to be a dick

    • @XxDatProGamingxX
      @XxDatProGamingxX 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@louisrobitaille5810shut up Louis

  • @9merk_
    @9merk_ 4 ปีที่แล้ว +64

    This is the first time I've seen either the Julia set or the Mandelbrot set actually explained. Bravo!

    • @mal2ksc
      @mal2ksc 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You need more Numberphile, they cover both.

  • @canaDavid1
    @canaDavid1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +89

    Just one thing: keep x and y to scale on your plots!

    • @samuelthecamel
      @samuelthecamel 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yeah, I was a bit confused for a second when the point didn't go around in a circular path

  • @AsakuraAvan
    @AsakuraAvan 4 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    You should get a PhD and become a college professor. You're great at explaining complex (no pun intended) concepts and a lot of students would really benefit from it.

  • @AaronHollander314
    @AaronHollander314 4 ปีที่แล้ว +74

    The amazing thing is that Julia did all this on paper and in his head.

  • @pierrepetuya3959
    @pierrepetuya3959 4 ปีที่แล้ว +300

    I’m watching smart people talk about funny numbers

    • @VoidHalo
      @VoidHalo 4 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      Protip: The more you watch stuff like this, the more sense it will make. A lot of this sorta stuff was over my head at one point, too. But I found the more I watched and the more stuff I looked up, the more pieces started fitting together and making sense. Math is like any language, the more you immerse yourself in it, the more you'll understand.
      There's still a fair bit I don't get, but the point is if you take your time and keep at it, you'll find yourself understanding things you never thought you could. Just remember to enjoy the journey and don't worry about how fast you'll get to the end. =) Cheers.

    • @VoidHalo
      @VoidHalo 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Oh yeah, have a play with Desmos, too. I can't stress enough how much it's helped me to learn. There's an online version that runs in your browser, so you don't even have to download anything.

    • @1sub2videos60
      @1sub2videos60 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      ​@@VoidHalo.. Why is this the same for me too? I wish I had chosen to do this kind of stuff when I was 8.. The more I watch this, you start to connect more ideas from math to other subjects.. that one formula that got you wondering-why is this true? (quadratic formula to completing the square; -b/2a to calculus and derivatives)
      It's a special feeling when you know you've learned this before school's even taught it to you :)
      2 years ahead on the subject of math (at least where I am)-in most other subjects, I suck. It's definitely the interest in watching these types of videos, and I can guarantee you that.

    • @VoidHalo
      @VoidHalo 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Heh, I actually dropped out in grade 9, so I'm mostly self taught, along with learning from videos and such. Though now that I'm in my 30s I wish I had stayed in school and actually learned this stuff back then. But I'm just not the sort of person who learns well in a school environment. I need to take my time and learn things by making intuitive connections, and be able to really appreciate what I'm learning. Rote memorization like school does just isn't for me. In school, I just dismissed math as a bunch of arbitrary nonsense because they never explained WHY things work. They just make you memorize the fact that they do work and then move on to the next topic. So didn't really care much about it as a result. And having deadlines and being pushed to learn about something in a given period of time just stresses me out and takes the fun out of it.
      Watching stuff like this, or learning about math in the context of engineering, physics or some other practical application has given me a whole new appreciation for it. Especially when I start seeing mathematical connections between topics that seem unrelated. Like how often Euler's number crops up. Or seeing the same formula being used to describe alternating current, waves on a pond and sound waves. And it's so satisfying to see these sorts of connections.
      If only TH-cam existed when I was in school.

    • @__________6931
      @__________6931 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@VoidHalo I'm in high school now and intrested in physics i try to understand everything intuitively but it take so much time for me to absorb concepts clearly, any suggestions from your side
      sorry for my bad english

  • @douglasstrother6584
    @douglasstrother6584 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    The visualization tools you young'uns have access to is pretty bitchen!
    We are fortunate to have guys like Zack (and a lot of other geeks) for these presentations. ~ GOB (Grouchy Old Bastard)

  • @monkaeyes3417
    @monkaeyes3417 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Literally just learnt about complex numbers last Wednesday and now it’s popped up in my recommendations

  • @sidstam
    @sidstam 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Excellent. I wasn't expecting the references to Mandelbrot sets - like watching a movie with a thrilling ending!

  • @jeremyacton4569
    @jeremyacton4569 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    I love how this video started off boring and square and Cartesian and went all trippy and psychedelic and fun all by itself. Julia must have been a really cool person. Such is the power of mathematical logic. :-)

  • @huaen8880
    @huaen8880 4 ปีที่แล้ว +48

    Here's the real question: how do we know the shape of the julia set? Why does it make fractals? I'm really interested in why fractals show up here!

    • @Nickesponja
      @Nickesponja 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      And why on earth it is connected only if C is in the Mandelbrot set!!!

    • @deepeshmeena3117
      @deepeshmeena3117 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      watch video on fractals the equation z^2-1 is the hint

    • @JivanPal
      @JivanPal 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@Nickesponja, the *_definition_* of the Mandelbrot set is the set of all complex numbers _c_ such that the Julia set of the function z ↦ z² + _c_ is connected. It turns out that an equivalent definition of the Mandelbrot set is the set of all complex numbers _c_ such that the magnitude of the sequence f(n) doesn't tend to infinity, where f(n) = [f(n−1)]² + _c_ and f(0) = 0.

    • @MagruderSpoots
      @MagruderSpoots 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You start by taking each point on the xy plane and performing the calculation as he has shown here. After each iteration you calculate the magnitude of the result x^2+y^2 >= 4 then the result will continue to infinity. If after a number of iterations the result is still less than 4 it is probably in the Julia or Mandelbrot set.
      You assign a color to the point by (# of iterations) mod (size of color palette) for points that go to infinity
      or black for points that are in the set.
      If you want to know more about why 4 is important look up some videos on Feigenbaums constant.

  • @ShawnDypxz
    @ShawnDypxz 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    We were just starting on complex analysis. You gave a nice overview of the topic. Thanks

  • @thomasolson7447
    @thomasolson7447 4 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    There is another Mandelbrot set. It's based on the ellipse rather than the circle. Eisenstein triples. I tried to update the wiki but they wouldn't let me.

  • @ahmednesartahsinchoudhury2628
    @ahmednesartahsinchoudhury2628 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    This video is so great! Hope you continue to make such videos. Great work.

  • @jeunjetta
    @jeunjetta 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Definitely one of your more useful videos. Thank you

  • @linkernick5379
    @linkernick5379 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Oh my gosh, I have UNDERSTOOD the way how the fractals are built, it's just clicked for me like a thumbler inside my head! Thank you for the video!

  • @altuber99_athlete
    @altuber99_athlete 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Wow. I've read about fractals before but never really understood them as complex numbers. But now I have a better idea, and they're beautiful. Please make more videos about complex numbers!

  • @earavichandran
    @earavichandran 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Best introductory video about conformal mappings and juila sets. You are awesome. Really jealous about you. Majorprep rockzzz

  • @enotdetcelfer
    @enotdetcelfer 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    That explanation / visualization was the thing I was missing to have the intuition, very cool, thanks

  • @biswabismitabag9017
    @biswabismitabag9017 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Amazing... Thanks for making such videos... 🙏

  • @pinkshortcomedy
    @pinkshortcomedy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You, along with Vsause and 3blue1brown are my fav channels. You post such amazing videos and explain stuff in such a simple and understandable way! Thank a lot for your hard work!

  • @devrajyaguru2271
    @devrajyaguru2271 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You are simply....most brilliant...thanks😉

  • @dibujodecroquis1684
    @dibujodecroquis1684 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thank you, man, now I understood why discrete transfer functions' poles with modulus inferior to 1 are stable and don't go to infinity. At college I was never told about "Julia set", it's probably too mathematical a concept for my engineer teachers.

  • @pabitraghadei5644
    @pabitraghadei5644 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I really love this

  • @balakrishnakumar1588
    @balakrishnakumar1588 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Eagerly craving for the next video in the series !!!?

  • @diegoteceletro
    @diegoteceletro 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Amazing!

  • @mltonsorangestapler
    @mltonsorangestapler 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Beautiful video, mate, the complexity of "complex numbers" is so fascinating. I think this subject might be one of the best parts of maths advancements of the 20th century or even just in recent civilization. I'd reckon patterns like this ought to emerge linked with electron (or other fields) descriptions as they're investigated over time. I remember back to learning about electron "orbitals"/"orbital clouds" in my university chemistry days and I remember how big of a difference it was from my previous conception about electrons being these little particles orbiting like planets in the planetary model. Given that EM waves behave like complex numbers and can be modeled as phasors, it would be interesting to know if electron orbitals can exhibit fractal-like patterns somehow. Cool vid

  • @bishanduttbhatt9694
    @bishanduttbhatt9694 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazingly beautiful video

  • @randomdude9135
    @randomdude9135 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Reminds me of the Numberphile video on Mandelbrot set 😊

  • @anshusingh1493
    @anshusingh1493 4 ปีที่แล้ว +209

    Grammar says "I am beautiful"
    Mathematician "i is beautiful"
    Subject verb agreement ----Am i joke to you😁😁🤣🤣🤣😇😇😇

    • @Astro-ms6zo
      @Astro-ms6zo 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      I dont understand why indians crop up everywhere with there stupid english grammar classes. Grow up, kids. Nobody cares for grammar that much. You should go learn your language and get some wisdom.

    • @randomdude9135
      @randomdude9135 4 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      @@Astro-ms6zo The joke went straight over your head!!
      And what's your problem with Indians?

    • @anshusingh1493
      @anshusingh1493 4 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      @@Astro-ms6zo why so serious man? You have grown up but what about your thinking man?? And yes I know my language and yours too ,i wrote my comment in English so that you can understand as you don't have understanding of hindi....i think u got my answer.......

    • @anshusingh1493
      @anshusingh1493 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@randomdude9135 😀

    • @anshusingh1493
      @anshusingh1493 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@Astro-ms6zo Can you judge whole Indians just with the help of my above witty response.??

  • @johnstfleur3987
    @johnstfleur3987 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I enjoyed it. Thank You.

  • @juanfa98
    @juanfa98 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great visuals

  • @tx6723
    @tx6723 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome video I was wondering you know about the art of computer programming books series if you could cover some of the heavy math calculus related topics there 😄 I always found that book series alluring however many say the math is heavily advanced however I still look at it from time to time and some videos going thru some of it in presentation I think would be unique and awesome content

  • @3moirai
    @3moirai 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Another excellent video! What software do you use to do your complex plane animations?

  • @sahilnajmal6958
    @sahilnajmal6958 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is awesome

  • @Diaming787
    @Diaming787 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I lowkey wish I studied complex analysis in phd studies. No other math is this beautiful

    • @erik-ic3tp
      @erik-ic3tp 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Golden Ratio is beautiful too. :)

  • @resuelgoog
    @resuelgoog 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Great stuff, 👍
    In Electronic and Electrical Engineering, 'we' use 'j' rather than 'i' to represent the square root of -1.
    This is simply because 'i' was already (often) used as a variable representing an Electrical Current.

    • @mltonsorangestapler
      @mltonsorangestapler 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      hey dude, EE here myself, check out my comment, if you please. It would be good to hear the perspective of a fellow EE.

    • @dibujodecroquis1684
      @dibujodecroquis1684 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I study Electrical Engineering too, but was never told why we used "j" instead of "i" for complex numbers.

    • @JivanPal
      @JivanPal 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      This is interestingly not as common in the UK, where common convention is the use a capital I to denote current, rather than lowercase, so there is no such clash.

    • @resuelgoog
      @resuelgoog 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@JivanPal I got my BSc. Electronic and Electrical Engineering in Scotland/UK.
      'We' would tend to use lowercase, such as 'i' or 'v' when referring to an alternating or signal (non-dc) current or voltage.
      Having said that, one can use any characters for variables, as long as what they represent is stated.
      'We' had to remember to write 'j = ✔️-1', wrt each set of calculations, in the exams. 😱
      (I Graduated in 1994).

    • @resuelgoog
      @resuelgoog 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@JivanPal btw: I watched your 6 May 2019 video, and gave a thumbs-up 👍
      Good to see you have keen and concise interest in mathematics.
      I just wanted to add that a friend doing a Physics BSc, at the same time, used 'i = ✔️-1'
      Therefore that/the 'convention' is probably down to the discipline studied and the teachers, etc.

  • @cjlooklin1914
    @cjlooklin1914 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Where did you go to school? My school did a real bad job at explaining the mathmatics to us, we weren't even required to to take single linear algebra class which made understanding all the topics covered in the more advances courses that much harder to understand. Im now starting grad school and am scrambling to have a solid understanding of the mathmatics before classes start in the fall.

  • @ryans7536
    @ryans7536 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good video!

  • @curtpiazza1688
    @curtpiazza1688 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    WOW! Cool Stuff! You certainly bring mathematics to life! 🎉 😊

  • @lilmonarch9935
    @lilmonarch9935 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    nice i just searched your channel to see if you had uploaded so,mething

  • @VoidHalo
    @VoidHalo 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    To anybody who wants to play with this stuff themselves, I strongly suggest checking out graphing apps like Desmos or Geogebra. They both have versions that run in your browser, though as far as I know those ones only do 2D graphing. But I know Geogebra has a mobile version that will make 3D graphs. And there is a mobile version of Desmos as well. I can't speak for any desktop versions, but it would be worth looking into that as well.
    It's amazing what you can learn simply by playing with various functions and equations, plugging in different numbers, and playing with the variables and seeing what happens. Before I tried Desmos, I didn't even know what a function was. But between playing with graphing apps and watching videos like this, I've learned a ton. They're pretty easy to figure out how to use, and you can make some pretty cool looking things. Even fractals. Happy Learning, guys. =)

  • @SE-144
    @SE-144 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Oh wow, this is sooo cool.

  • @tinasihoe1118
    @tinasihoe1118 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I'm curious why the mandelbrot set seems to represent or be related to the cos(t) parametric function.

  • @sergiolucas38
    @sergiolucas38 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    nice video, super interesting :)

  • @ArvindDevaraj1
    @ArvindDevaraj1 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mind blowing

  • @husseinmohamud6506
    @husseinmohamud6506 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    As a highscooler i came across 3:30 as modulus argument form.

  • @mnada72
    @mnada72 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great ... Now I come to know what is Julia set and Mandelbrot set, although I watched many complex videos but this is the first time to notice that there is a Julia set for each function and there is also a single Mandelbrot set ! I hope I catched it right
    I wonder why I didn't hear that before !

  • @adityams1659
    @adityams1659 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    hey, great vedio. but,
    how did u animate it... with desmos??
    could u share the code please?

  • @senya1696
    @senya1696 ปีที่แล้ว

    WOW, it is a very interesting thing, and the fact that I don't understand anything doesn't make these videos less interesting

  • @hyperduality2838
    @hyperduality2838 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Fractals = Self similarity = self equivalence = self duality
    Duality = equivalence principle = The laws of physics are the same for all observers = Objective democracy.
    Subjective is dual to objective

  • @sreedharb.k6274
    @sreedharb.k6274 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can you make a video on complex numbers and real life applications

  • @davidwilkie9551
    @davidwilkie9551 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    (Will need to watch again. Using Polar-Cartesian coordinates in conjunction with Survey tools tends to set the Mathematical Intuitions in concrete mental habits, so the visual synthesis of the vector graphics "does not compute" automatically. That's why reiteration-research improvements, is Science)
    Every student should have a feel for vector fields in perspective?, the navigational approach. The same teaching and learning process as simultaneously putting math-physics/science in the picture by Geometrical Drawing and Perspective, the navigational/functional approach to Polar-Cartesian coordination.

  • @collegemathematics6698
    @collegemathematics6698 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    U R great.. 🌹

  • @motivationforyouth9926
    @motivationforyouth9926 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Majorprep I just wanted to know out of curiosity how are u able to come up with patterns that complex numbers form ....is it there in any book. If it is there so I would love to read that thanks

  • @anteconfig5391
    @anteconfig5391 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    4:48 he started with 45 complex points and ended up with 18
    I know complex numbers are used to understand quantum qbits. Could this be the reason why qbits look so random?

  • @iggyts2239
    @iggyts2239 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Do a video about the differences between electrical engineering and electronics engineering plz

  • @lateefahmadwanilaw8948
    @lateefahmadwanilaw8948 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing

  • @sulfurx777
    @sulfurx777 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    9:40 that’s amazing

  • @kimanhchung8372
    @kimanhchung8372 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks

  • @Venentine
    @Venentine 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Are there any 3D plotting tools out there to help visualize things like this and other plotting that requires more than 2 axes?

  • @HL-iw1du
    @HL-iw1du 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Why do I understand you so much better than 3 blue 1 brown? I can’t figure out why.

  • @pras1293
    @pras1293 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent. but when will I learn all these and connect it with physics or chemistry or any science . Will it not take ages. Plz tell how you learn all these .. How much time did you take

  • @OneShot_cest_mieux
    @OneShot_cest_mieux 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    please uses an orthonormed system, especially when you are dealing with angles

    • @zachstar
      @zachstar  4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Okay maybe I'm just being stupid but which part of the video did I not do this?

    • @OneShot_cest_mieux
      @OneShot_cest_mieux 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@zachstar At 3:00 for instance, 1 unit on the x axis is larger than 1 unit on the y axis.
      And sorry if my English is bad, I am french

    • @ewthmatth
      @ewthmatth 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      4:30 is way worse

  • @iiimusika
    @iiimusika 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    excelent

  • @JayTemple
    @JayTemple ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm looking at the Mandelbrot Set at 11:10. At -.75+0i and -1.25+0i, does the set break into otherwise disconnected regions that are tangent at those points, or is there really an open "interval" where -.75+yi is in the set for -.05 (or so) < y < =.05?

  • @theuserfromwakanda5497
    @theuserfromwakanda5497 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Love your videos. You should change your channel's name to MathMajor instead of MajorPrep at this point lol

  • @muruganumadevi9477
    @muruganumadevi9477 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How did u make black bg in desmos??

  • @megaman7272
    @megaman7272 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    i just watched smt amazing. woooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooow

  • @NevaehBeatez
    @NevaehBeatez 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    How do you animate your desmos presentations so well? I need tips!

    • @zachstar
      @zachstar  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      a lot of sliders! That's really what made the animations look like they did. Also that combined with parametric equations makes for some cool graphics. The next video (I think) looks much cooler and it's basically all parametric equations to represent complex outputs. Here's an example of a file from this video though, www.desmos.com/calculator/ytdemxfw8p

    • @winnatmath967
      @winnatmath967 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@zachstar That was exactly my question, so thanks for being willing to answer. Great video...both for the quality and math!

  • @HaDo0601
    @HaDo0601 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Omg, best things I’ve learnt in 5 years

    • @Ninjaananas
      @Ninjaananas 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I feel sad for you then.

  • @scruff8072
    @scruff8072 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Re: Connectivity in the Julia Set - Is the Mandelbrot set a kind of derivative of the Julia Set?

    • @NonTwinBrothers
      @NonTwinBrothers 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      The Mandelbrot set is all of the Julia sets at the point 0+0i, hence calculating the Mandelbrot set starts with z = 0.

  • @me43135
    @me43135 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Did you use the manim package for animation? (The package 3b1b uses)

    • @zachstar
      @zachstar  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No, this was all desmos

  • @yugeshkeluskar
    @yugeshkeluskar 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can you please send the link to that website for Julia set!?

    • @zachstar
      @zachstar  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      just put it in the description!

  • @ihatekpop7663
    @ihatekpop7663 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love the black background gosh

  • @patitovi
    @patitovi ปีที่แล้ว

    ¿Qué sofware usas para hacer las animaciones?

  • @wordstohisbrideministries5284
    @wordstohisbrideministries5284 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    With the Julia Set, is the border (that surrounds the black area) infinite in length? What is the volume of the black area in the Julia Set? Is it possible for the volume of the black area of the Julia Set, though at first examination appears finite, in reality infinite? If not, is there a fractal that has an infinite border length that contains infinite volume?

    • @JayTemple
      @JayTemple ปีที่แล้ว

      I don't have a direct answer for this, but I recall a video describing a sequence of sets that end up with the same feature as the Julia Set. The perimeter has no upper bound, while the area does. That suggests to me that, as your wording suggests you believe, the border of the Julia Set is infinite and the area is finite.

  • @STAND_by_MODUS
    @STAND_by_MODUS 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    "and now we get to my favourite part in this video... an AD starts xD

  • @anandaperumalb1044
    @anandaperumalb1044 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    dude!
    what software application do you use to edit and create your videos

    • @zachstar
      @zachstar  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      This one was all desmos! Totally free.

  • @FenrizNNN
    @FenrizNNN 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yooo the Mandelbrot set be looking thicc

  • @KrytenKoro
    @KrytenKoro 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wait, does the Julia set consist just of the boundary, or include all the pts that go to 0? Wikipedia seems to disagree

    • @JayTemple
      @JayTemple ปีที่แล้ว

      He explains this in a comment near the top.

  • @FreeGroup22
    @FreeGroup22 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    no, there is more mandelbrot sets, for example with f(z)=z^n+c

  • @codatheseus5060
    @codatheseus5060 ปีที่แล้ว

    "now let's get to my favorite part of the video"
    Ad for Swiffer mop and Oral-B

  • @manolocarmen5968
    @manolocarmen5968 ปีที่แล้ว

    I’m currently eating rice, alone in my bathroom, half naked, on the verge of madness.

  • @sakshamsingh4378
    @sakshamsingh4378 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    MP means maths and physics to me

  • @lifehope4201
    @lifehope4201 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Not understood after Julia set☹️

  • @deaffromabove6640
    @deaffromabove6640 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What does the notation 2(1)(2)i mean? I thought brackets means that you evaluate what's in them before anything else, but in the his context it doesn't seem correct as 1 is well... 1. Sorry if this is a dumb question, mathematics is more of a spectator sport for me.

    • @zachstar
      @zachstar  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It just means multiply

  • @Dominexis
    @Dominexis 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    One of my first shaders on Shadertoy was a Julia set renderer: www.shadertoy.com/view/wsdcWf
    Pretty neat.

  • @sanjibacharjyya3350
    @sanjibacharjyya3350 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What is the meaning of X+iY Numbers of mangoes actually.

  • @TheArtofCodeIsCool
    @TheArtofCodeIsCool 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    For a more hands-on explanation of the mandelbrot set: th-cam.com/video/6IWXkV82oyY/w-d-xo.html

  • @ir2001
    @ir2001 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    @2:25 lol

  • @LucasDimoveo
    @LucasDimoveo 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    What mathematics class do I need to take to understand this at an undergrad level?

    • @chrimony
      @chrimony 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      An undergrad? As in you are in college? You should have already been exposed to complex numbers, algebra, and sin/cos functions.

    • @SLAMgamer11
      @SLAMgamer11 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      high school math will do

    • @nanakokuroi3619
      @nanakokuroi3619 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Linear algebra and calculus.

  • @alejrandom6592
    @alejrandom6592 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    everything is connected

  • @cardcode8345
    @cardcode8345 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi , can you explain more about job outsourcing, H1-B crises and Automation. Impacted industries in next few years

  • @Avighna
    @Avighna 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    WOAH

  • @JeanDAVID
    @JeanDAVID 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Complex numbers : how to add oranges and bananas ? You need fruitagorian theorem !

  • @mscir
    @mscir 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    has anyone researched maths where they used the square root of physical constants?
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_physical_constants

  • @jonathanbeltran188
    @jonathanbeltran188 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    No steady state AC circuits? :(

    • @zachstar
      @zachstar  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I was going to include that in this or the following video but since I've already done one on that I wanted to mix it up. Next will be control's focused.

    • @denelson83
      @denelson83 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@zachstar Don't forget complex impedance, for those ham radio nuts like me.

  • @jack_papel
    @jack_papel 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    How do complex numbers