US Testing its Brand New Advanced Boeing Aircraft
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ม.ค. 2023
- Welcome back to the FLUCTUS channel for a discussion about the latest military trainer aircraft to join the U.S. fleet and some of the many aircraft that have trained pilots over the years.
Fluctus is a website and TH-cam channel dedicated to sea geeks. Whenever you are curious or an incorrigible lover of this mysterious world, our videos are made for you !
We publish 3 videos a week on our TH-cam channel and many more articles on our website.
Feel free to subscribe to not miss any of our updates and visit our website to discover additional content.
Don’t forget to follow us on twitter:
/ fluctusofficial
Please keep the comments section respectful. Any spam, insults or troll will be deleted.
To contact us, make sure to use our email in the about section of this channel.
![[MPD직캠] 베이비몬스터 직캠 8K 'LIKE THAT' (BABYMONSTER FanCam) | @MCOUNTDOWN_2024.6.13](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/8qa-nm9bCLs/mqdefault.jpg)
![🎮เกมยิงปืนใหม่ ภาพสวย และ สมจริงที่สุดในโลก [ BODYCAM ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/My3l1owRY9I/mqdefault.jpg)
SAAB seems to be really good at making cheap capable aircraft 👍
The old T-38 actually outperforms this in many respects (top speed, rate of climb). This is more advanced, though. Not many aircraft look as cool as the T-38/F-5 though. This isn't bad looking.
And the T-38, per my understanding, was difficult to stall due to its high thrust to weight ratio; a major advantage for an aircraft to be flown by trainees. (BTW: Interesting that an even older a/c was used as a chase plane during the T7 test flights: An A-4.)
A cool thing is the Navy has been testing a Test aircraft out side of the PAX river airbase and even broke the sound barrier. If you tried hard enough and had the time you can actually see the runways and might be able to catch a sight of the aircraft
Very smooth and polished production. I thoroughly enjoyed it.
*_Former Boeing Commercial and Military - Lean Manufacturing._*
The first thing that stood out for me is the Cockpit. It is designed for 2, instructor and student. The rear seat is elevated a considerable amount while front seat is lowered. The resulting vertical spacing separation allows rear position to see over the top of front position. The amount of vertical separation was not by accident. The amount of vertical difference is considerable and the rear position has great forward visibility as does the front position.
*_Great looking Trainer... it will be used for many years to come..._*
Back when men were men (T-38), we landed no flaps at night with no front visibility. It was called by some, doing the Stevie Wonder
@@hugoglenn9741 Thanks for comment and a brand new term for 'buckle up'
F-5, T-38's fighting version was an amazing jet. It was unappreciated by the Air Force. It was finally put to rest.
It is also a supersonic aircraft.
Now that's a sexy aircraft.
In the early 80s Northrop tried to getvthe AIRFORCE to buy a updated Aircraft called the F-20 Tiger shark it was a little larger better version of the F-5
Most beautiful jet ever made IMHO.
Doesn't Iran still have these.
gotta hand it to the Swedes. they could make furniture (Ikea), fighter jets (Saab Gripen) and recoilless rifles (Carl Gustaf) which the US military are using. they have good quality manufacturing….
Sweden and Switzerland are among top arms exporters per capita in the world, quite ironic.
Ya isn’t that amazing! Just like the USA is not a one horse carriage either 😏😆😆
@ucruci2 wdym by this exactly
You forgot meetballs!!!
As well as axes and other wood working tools. Gransfors Bruk is the name of the maker. Handmade and Easy to tell that they are built to last a lifetime
The Lockheed T-33A was the first jet powered trainer although it could be argued that the P-59B was the first jet to be used as a trainer.
Don't know for certain but I suspect that the Meteor trainer probably entered service before the T33 and I have seen photographs of a 2 seat ME262 but again I'm not sure when it was used, any comments??
25 May 2023. Boeing announces a TWO YEAR delay in delivery of the new Air Force primary jet trainer. Latest Biden/Boeing stumble appears to be the ejecting seat minimum weight limit specifications. Not too good at safley launching little kids or thin young women pilots. So the Air Force will keep flying the magnificently desigend and updated Northrop T-33s and scramble trying to come up with obscure spare parts for subcontractor systems where as that company no longer has the tooling or its gone out of business. The Navy will keep flying the updated T45 while possibly looking at Northrop-Grumman for a new tail hook trainer similar to the T-33 and F5-E/F that are easy to maintain and can last 50 or 60 years if necessary.
Im an engineering student who has several concepts for new aircraft in the works and I just wanna say… this looks awesome 💯🔥
Good for u who cares
@@asianlovebug582 you must be such a joy to be around
Glad Boeing and SAAB got it right. They both badly needed this contract. Lot’s of jobs saved at both companies.🤗
Boeing and SAAB are wrong this time. Computer simulations alone cannot develop airplanes. A wind tunnel experiment is essential.
Saab in parallel developed the all new (similar looks as the legacy Gripen C/D) Gripen E/F fighter jet for the Swedish and Brazilian Air Forces.
@@chosh0802 Cuestión de criterios no ?
The T-38 "Talon" is a beautiful aircraft. It looks like it's going supersonic just sitting on the ground. Another name for the T-37 "Tweet" was "Converter," i.e., a machine that converts jet fuel to noise.
My uncle flew the T-37 and T-38. Unfortunately, his first foray in the back seat of an F-4 ended in a training crash that claimed his life as well as the driver. I’ve often wondered how far he would have went in the Air Force.
Sorry for your loss.
Bro,its a pilot ...not a driver..
@@SB-dp6kh Driver since it happened on the ground
@@playo9197 With all due respect; a pilot isn't a driver until he's completed the takeoff. the guy infront was a pilot not a driver.
There are no circumstances where a pilot is referred to as a driver.
@@ServiceProcess I see, so a pilot isn't a driver unless he completes takeoff. And "the guy infront" was a pilot and not a driver. . . I can see why this may have caused the crash.
Great video! Very educational. Exceptional history lesson. Bravo.
I was stationed at Sheppard AFB and Laughlin AFB between 1990 and 1992 when I was in the USAF. I saw the T-37 and T-38 flying almost daily for 2 years. At the time, USAF flight training took the student from the T-37 into the T-38 over their nearly 3 year course of study and earning their wings. They would spend almost a year in the T-37, then go off to Fairchild AFB in Washington state for Escape and Evasion Survival Training for use if they should ever have to bailout. That course was 6 months. Then they would come back and spend a year in the Talon. So during the course of their training, they started in the jet with the lowest landing speed in the USAF aircraft inventory (T-37) and ended in the jet with the highest landing speed in the inventory (T-38). After that, they would then transition to another base for training in whatever aircraft they would be working with for the bulk of their career. Most went to transports. Only a few students were lucky enough to be slotted for a fighter or bomber, and back then, most already knew what they would be flying once they were done with the primary training.
Then in the mid to late 90s, the USAF added the Jayhawk. Pilot trainees would start in the T-37. If they were going into transports, their 2nd year of training would be in the Jayhawk. If they had a fighter slot or were going into the B-1 or B-2, then they would go to the T-38.
The process is the basically the same these day. The only real change is the aircraft. They start in the T-6 Texan II, then transition to either the Jayhawk or the T-7 for their 2nd year.
WHAT........
Survival at Fairchild is only 2 weeks now!
No doubt partnering with SAAB made all the difference. They are a tremendous company, whereas Boeing, not so much.
The T-7 it looks bad ass
I still like the T37/T38 combo. Bunch of nice birds.
Just sitting on the ramp the T38 looked supersonic and downright sleek.
I have a 1000 hrs in the T-38 and consider it my favorite plane. You wore that plane when you were flying it. It was sleek, slick, nimble and fast. It was a plane that you flew on the edge.
Hahahaha prrrrrrrrrrrrr prrrrrrrrr 🚿☢️😂🚽💩🐫🎶🎶🎶🎶🎶🎶🎹
Awesome show of training Aircraft. Just Awesome.
T7 vs TA50
Which would be more cost effective?
TA 50 sold a lot in many countries, and T7 is new to market? Does anyone know their performance?
The more adavanced cost effective and sold is the T346.
Ta 50 up grade for Poland in progress. Also planned to make a single seat version soon. Also, there is a project to upgrade for aircraft carriers. If all of this is carried out, I think it will be a very cost-effective program. For t7 to become cost effective, it needs to outsell ta50. The cost of making t7 is higher since labour is US is higher. Also, the ta50 production line is all set, but t7 is new, so to bring up production to a ta50 level, it may take a few more years, I believe
This is very interesting. However, I would like to see the other craft the T7 beat.
My dad flew both the A-37 and later the F-4 in Vietnam. But if memory serves me right I believe his first military training was in a Cessna even though he had been flying my grandfathers Piper Cub for years.
Yep, a Cessna 172 whose military designation was the T-41. Having gone through the program myself during the Vietnam days it was 30 hrs in the T-41, 90 hrs in the T-37 and 120 hrs in the T-38 in 53 weeks. The T-7A has some big shoes to fill replacing the T-38. I have very fond memories of my time in it.
Cool. This plane looks like an f18 crossed with a VW beetle
The first production T-7A wasn't even rolled out until April 2022. Not sure where the 2021 date came from. As recently as Dec 2022, the US Air Force announced T-7A production has been delayed until 2024. Boeing has to fix some ejection seat and flight control system issues before the USAF will approve production.
I heard that there is still some design problems which could cause "wing-lock" and other issues. This is more like Boeing's commercial, promotional content. What is the exact status of this training jet?
Indeed the Redhawk has wing issues. Wing Rock not Lock is what aviation week September 21, 2021 has a article on the web on it. It is years late now. Boeing is having issues with the Pegasus Refueler, Redhawk 737max, 777x and the 787 Dreamliner grounded again in 2-23. There constant failures to meet their contract obligations with both constant delays and major issues resulting in a loss of confidence. The reason they are picked is no surprise as the Lobbyists pay off congress in record numbers causing Boeing to move their offices from Washington State to Chicago and now to Virginia to place their massive teams of bribing lobbyists closer to congress. Allowing legal bribery is ruining our proud military denying our Pilots the equipment they deserve and getting poor value for the taxpayers. Airbus 330 refuelers are abundant cheaper and almost problem free but as always bribes are bribes.
It has one other problem no one speaks about. It won the competition based on a cheaper trainer than Lockheed-Martin/KAI model. However, Boeing-Saab has had numerous cost over runs and delays. This is not unusual unless you are the low bid.
Magnificent airplane !...
This would be a kick ass cover aircraft for the A-10 or even a good recon aircraft
What about wing-rock? Is it fixed?
Talks about the Texan II, shows the old 1950s era Texan with a radial engine.
Buy the T-50.
i like its video good juppp
Great my country,, God bless 🇺🇸,, Ty,,
Omg the "music"!!!! The pauses !!! 5yr olds must be really impressed 🤣
The T6 Texan was introduced in the 1930s and 40s to train pilots in the US Airforce and retired in 1999 rather than introduced in 2001 as you said.
Also the P51 B or C you showed was never used as a trainer as far as I’m aware at any stage. It was a WW2 frontline fighter plane only.
Apparently they confused the T6 Texan with the AT6 Texan II.
Can’t tell if you are being a punk or not .. the Texan 2 has been in service over 20 years .. or maybe you just didn’t know?
Also, The North AmericanT6 ( Harvard ) was not powered by a turboprop engine. I'm still laughing!
@@CanadairCL44 Yeah, the T6 motor is a big ol' radial, which you can certainly hear. ATA6 Texan II has the slick turboprop.
So the fanny tail ?
The Grumman avenger! Is what his older brother flew ! In action
The Red Hawk was named in Honor of Tuskegee Airmen and it’s livery of those celebrated Red Tails of WW2! One of the most decorated fighter groups of WW2 with over 80 air medals!
Actually overhyped, though.
@@leeshackelford7517 ya really Suck-a-Ford! 😉
the 332nd had one of the worst combat records of any fighter group in the war. They didn't produce a SINGLE ace.
@@CRAZYHORSE19682003 hey why don’t you go tell that to the Air Force. Let you tell it, the United States Air Force is so damn stupid for honoring the 332nd of WW2 fame.
It’s funny how many of guys never even served a day in uniform but think they know what they’re talking about!
Well guess what ignoramus, here’s a couple facts for you! 1. The remarks I originally made is 100% factually based. 2. The Air Force has had a memorial and statute honoring the Tuskegee Airmen at the United States Air Force Academy for decades upon decades!
Therefore, if that is all true? That means that the Air Force immensely respects them and ergo, you’re just a piss-ant who’s opinion is if no importance whatsoever!
No mention of the T-45 Goshawk
I'm glad to see Boeing working with SAAB.
The body looks very similar to the British RAF Hawk. It's the RAF training aircraft been around since 1974 similar body same name and it's used for training pilots. The Red Arrows also use the Hawk.
so do the US Navy as the T45
The T-7 looks to be an awesome jet trainer! Having half the power of a legacy F/A-18 Hornet is incredible in itself. I don't know how the top speed is quoted at at only 808MPH when stated 17 200 lbs thrust with afterburner engaged?
They don't want the airframe to fall apart.
@@tedmoss That's just a single engine F-18. There's nothing special or Advanced about it. That's like a downgrade!
보잉의 무리한 꼼수로인해 무리수를 격고있는 사업중하나.
Meanwhile South Korea has had its T-50 in service since 2005. Apart from the twin tail the T-50 looks almost identical in profile. The T-50 has a max speed of Mach 1.5. Quite aa bit faster.
This is a nice jingoistic ad though.
Past, present, future, more and more progress, more and more advanced, more and more perfect, more and more exciting!
過去，現在，将来，越来越进步，越来越超前，越来越完善，越来越精彩 !
5:08 I love how its being filmed by a modified A-4
That Simulator is what every Air gamers want!
That new AT-6 Wolverine looks like a modern day P-51 Mustang! WOW!
Fun to hear that SAAB is involved once being a hired guy down in the SAAB group. Don't forget the cars made by SAAB! I had 3 of them.
As once a private pilot flying a "trainer" (MFI9b) that during the Biafra war was equipped with rockets being the Biafra "air force". The pilot was Carl Gustav von Rosen, and he fought the Migs! They didn't get him! During that time the MFI9b was classified as military. Trips outside Sweden were prohibited, or very difficult... Fun knowing I was flying "military" equipment...
saab + boeing + mafiacongressual lobbies = new trainer abort
I bought new 1972 SAAB 99E and was very deeply impressed. The most beautiful car I ever owned. I loved driving it, but couldn't make up my mind about the qualities I admired most. It had the ergonomics of a jet fighter, the strength of a tank, 40mpg with plenty of power, absolutely incredible in the snow -- but the one answer that covered everything -- incredible engineering. Designed for a long life.
I'd still be driving it today -- 50 years later if I could have found an honest SAAB mechanic near where I lived (in MA).
SAAB lost its best mechanics to Subaru. SAAB was the first with FWD, Subaru was second.
@@johnedwards3621 Horrible car, unreliable and like so many it fell apart, eaten away by rust, thanks to the use of steel rolls made in the USSR, and a bad copy of other European cars of the time, truly beautiful and unforgettable
Saab hasn't manufactured cars since 2016, when the auto group went bankrupt. I had a 1982 Saab 900 Turbo I bought brand new when I was in the military stationed in Germany. Loved that car, but it was expensive to work on and there wasn't an extensive dealer network in the US.
@@ahill209 Actually from 2000 it was a Saab by the name only since GM took it over an ran the brand into the gound...
Amazing, i love it ! 😉
There’s one other thing I wish saab what do start building cars again
GM owned the Saab car brand from 2000, Saab AB is purely aerospace and defence company and makes super stealthy submarines as well
Looks like T50 golden eagle
And they are coming first to an airforce base right down the road from my house. Nice!
Fantastic Boeing T 7 fighter aircraft # 👍
great videos, but could you please shorten the length to 10 minutes for each video?
🤔Incorrect statement at 9:30.
The T-38 is the first Supersonic trainer.
Not the T-7.
you have admit the T7 is a really good looking plane
That playing the popular one looks like a World War II era playing
It's just a training plane. The initials "T" which means Training .
It’s got the wing shape of the P51 mustang!😎🇺🇸
A very cool little trainer!!!
The T-7 looks like lovechild between a Boeing F/A18 Hornet and a Dassault/Dornier Alphajet
Obviously it is a lovechild between Boeing and SAAB 💕
Thank you. That’s my opinion as well
Past, present, future, more and more progress, more and more advanced, more and more perfect, more and more exciting!
Sky-Raider was the best trainer/attack aircraft.
The T-33 (F-80 Shooting Star) was the first jet trainer.
That is one good looking plane.
Hermosas máquinas para surcar los cielos 👍👏👏
Wow … another amazing bird
Awesome video!
T-7 looks awesome great looking plane
Is the wing rock problem solved?
When does production start?
Pretty cool it looks like a baby F-18
The AT6 Texan had a top speed of only about 208 mph, not the 350 you stated. The T 28 would get closer to that speed (348 mph).
He just mixed up the aircraft.
The SR-71 was developed faster than a trainer. Kelly Johnson was a miracle worker.
a good looking aircraft is a good aircraft
很棒的视频👌👌
I don’t know any pilot that would pass up the opportunity to fly the new T-6. Mr. Beech might not argue.
The showed a guy with VR on.. Lol He was probably playing Star Wars
The T-37 was the first jet trainer used by the US armed forces? What about the T-33?
They should do sit-ups where the upper part of the abdomen is worked, with the legs raised and trying to touch the feet with the hands and its variants that work the upper part of the abdomen, they will see improvements quickly. That upper abdominal exercise will take away your depression and anxiety, it will also heal your mind.
It looks very similar to South Korean KAI FA-50 recently purchased by Poland.
That's about the sexiest trainer aircraft since the Mustang. Looks almost like a mini F-18.
I hope they have some flexibility to do something in war time. Maybe some hard points to carry a few dumb bombs?
And I love the Northrop F --- 5 " Freedom Fighter " 4th generation multi --- role fighter/trainer jets that used to be the " front line jet fighters " of our Armed Forces of the Philippines's ( Courage --- Integrity --- Loyalty ) Philippine Air Force's U.S.A.'s " Top --- Gun " --- trained Philippine or Filipino fighter pilots or flight aviators.And it is so sad that the Northrop F --- 5 " Freedom Fighter " fighter jets were retired,I believed in 2005 decade.And also the North American Aviation Company's F --- 86 Sabre 4th generation multi --- role fighters also became " the front line fighter jets " of our Philippine Air Force and,sad to say,They were also retired many,many and many years ago.And our all --- appointed,our all --- chosen and our all --- called Philippine Air Force U.S.A.'s " Top --- Gun " --- trained fighter pilots or flight aviators are currently mobilizing,deploying and flying their South Korean Aerospace Industries also known as K.A.I. invented,built and made F --- 50 "Fighting Eagle " 4th generation multi --- role fighter/trainer jets.
I Like us fighter jet F 18 super hornet and f 22 Raptor. 👍👍👍
Tweet had the same engine as the talon or F5. But at37 was an attack extraordinaire
J-65 vs J85..
ha, love the callsign, "bull" Schmidt
Those new recruits should continue getting some time in gliders.
That is experience power pilots all could use.
I've taken many up and they generally say something like, felt like I never flew before.
Well thats how the Luft waffe started training its pilots and it became a pretty effective airforce
The T-33 was the first USAF jet trainer. There is no way the Tweet could reach 39,000 feet.
Love it.
Wow wow incredible
Red Tail =very beautiful aircraft ! ground attack version ??? Will Sweden be buying any ?
Hermosa nave🙂
I wonder if there will be a T-7B with the F-414 engine that produces much more thrust, allowing much easier supersonic performance.
What about the British Hawk ? Wasn't that suitable candidate ? Or an upgraded Alpha Jet ?
Variant of the F-5 family (T-38, F-5, F-18, F-20). Interesting amalgamation of innovation.
No one would have thought the A4 Skyhawk.
The T-38c has not been replaced by the T-7. The T-7 will replace the T-38c when they become available.
Why would you say the T-7 is the Airforce's FIRST supersonic ic trainer, only to state the supersonic performance of the AT-38 moments later?? Since its inception into the Airforce in 1958, the T-38 has been a supersonic trainer.
Dude... you showed the older T6 from WW2 era 😁
T-38 is a excellent plane.
Unfortunately, it is in the 2nd position after T-50 as a training jet in the world.
Hahaha... This plane better FA50?
Just a little off there with the T-6 stock footage
Eager to see the USAF to start using the new T-7A Redtail. It kinda looks like an F-18 & F-16 had a baby. :) Also love the T-6 Texan II, reminds me of A P-51 mustang with a turbine engine.
I hate the T6. Wish the AF would have kept the T37 and just updated the electrical systems.
We should make stealth prop fighter planes. Prop planes can out maneuver fast jets. If the enemy can't get a lock on it. A prop plane can maneuver to a good position and strike it with a long-range missile.