Renowned B.C. forest ecologist fielding criticism of her life's work.

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 12 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 7

  • @steppingonlego7493
    @steppingonlego7493 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you Suzanne for all the work you have contributed to these studies. Honestly the criticism I could see regarding the science would be from government and companies that rely and plan around replacing natural forests with monocultures. Which of course removes functioning forests of the biodiversity. In which case the argument that not all forests communicate in the same way is true. You wouldn't have the same dynamic systems of roots and fungi capable of signaling messages to each other as you would with undisturbed forests.

  • @suztjembijawatson3362
    @suztjembijawatson3362 ปีที่แล้ว

    You can always learn more. Studies help enlighten us and perhaps trigger other ways of looking at things. Interesting study!

  • @cherylsibson2529
    @cherylsibson2529 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think Suzanne is onto something, although I'm not ultimately, religious. if you go by words, what happens in one, happens to us all' What happens in heaven can be just as good as it happens here, to translate tree langue " the hills, valleys, also exists in the oceans in where also earthquakes happen, Tectonic plates of course it's all connected, the earth talks all the time to us, we just need to be quite enough to listen to her. Thank you Suzanne.

  • @thricecrazy33
    @thricecrazy33 ปีที่แล้ว

    mycorrhiza are in all soil types, and they do communicate chemically. Binding them to old growth protection doesnt hold weight. Mycorrhiza and many soil agents exist everywhere.