I just attended the one in Philadelphia, and though it touches on similar topics, this is a completely different conversation. Grateful to have heard them both. Very amazing, carefully woven and beautiful. It was an honor.
@@gtkona1608 a worldview based in an epistomology view of anti-realism/creative anti-realism and borrowing from things such as the Social Role View, with the belief in that framework to hold the most amount of overall human equity possible.
Probably this shouldn't have been posted. I'm certain he will drop the full contents after we have waited and not one of us can handle the responsibility of the first story that he told us that is officially produced. I advise you to delete this video and replace it with an apology to the individuals who watched this video.
@@roxanahutchcroft1236 Yeah, I'm obviously too stupid to comprehend the genius of J.P. Only the enlightened ones like yourself are capable of understanding the complexity of his ideas.
The bible doesn’t belong to any one religion, it doesn’t even belong to religion per se, it is a book for all people. Everyone has a right to read it and try understand it and benefit from the lessons within.
Jordan is admitting he is being an entertainer, and not a therapist of a science. Jordan is a Frasier Crane wannabe. He is an entertainer not a psychologist. Because he sells books and videos and lectures, THAT IS NOT THERAPY. He needs to address his bad conduct in courts in the case of Case 1 Sordi v. Sordi, 2009 CanLII 80104 (ON SC) he defamed a parent in court. In the case 2 R. v. Pearce, 2012 MBQB 22 (CanLII) he tried to free a murderer. Then in the case Peterson v. College of Psychologists of Ontario, 2023 ONSC 4685, he tried to avoid taking responsibility. He also tried to interfere in a family court case in Montana, the Kolstadt case, where there was a GAG order, he unprofessionally diagnosed a minor without interviews or assessments, and tried to defend unfit parents.
Uh.. dudes not perfect, but there's no arguing the fact that he's influencing so many lives in a positive way. I think at the root of it all that's what's most important. Like him or not, he's doin something right, and it's probably a good idea to be open to what he has to say
@@styplaya First, we need scientific proof he has helped ANYONE. Second, it doesn't matter, his conduct was intentional, and he has NEVER said it was a mistake. Nor apologized for all of the damage he has caused. We need for him to "confess" his sins before we can forgive him. Third, what proof do you have that would prove he is not requiring you all to subjugate to a specific cultural behavior norms, and not acting with a universal approach proven to be effective?
@@stevengoldstein114 hm, that's my point, is at the root of everything he has to say, there seems to be a universal approach- that's to listen to the eternal goodness within (love, kindness, integrity, whatever). I'm not saying worship him, or even worship Christianity, nor is he
@@styplaya But his approach is not universal, He reverts to a Male / Female relationship model all the time, and refers to the Christian bible for his so called moral foundation. This makes him violate again the Code of Ethics in Canada and the US as a psychologist.
@@stevengoldstein114 right but I think you might take what he has to say about the Bible too literally. The truest foundation is God itself, and the Bible does a heck of a job pointing to it. The Bible is misinterpreted by mostly everyone including "good Christians" and he knows that, but chooses to utilize it anyway for what it really is meant to express. There's divinity within, and stories seem to represent that divinity. It's not a bad thing
I just attended the one in Philadelphia, and though it touches on similar topics, this is a completely different conversation. Grateful to have heard them both. Very amazing, carefully woven and beautiful. It was an honor.
thanks, bought a ticket in january but i couldnt make the show. this at least makes me feel like i didnt completely miss him. thanks for posting
Same here, I'm supposed to be at his show right now. At least I found this video.
Absolute legend thank you
Thank you for posting ❤❤🙏🏾🙏🏾
I’m going with my father today. I’m a far Left person and my father is a SocDem. Still find him interesting
@@ThySheepie How does being far left manifest in your behavior? What are the principles upon which you base your far left position?
@@gtkona1608 a worldview based in an epistomology view of anti-realism/creative anti-realism and borrowing from things such as the Social Role View, with the belief in that framework to hold the most amount of overall human equity possible.
@@gtkona1608 That’s why I maintain myself as a Leftist. I apologize if that doesn’t answer your question. Currently working on homework right now.
@@ThySheepiein other words 🤡
That's not Jordan Peterson talking.
This is AI.
Probably this shouldn't have been posted. I'm certain he will drop the full contents after we have waited and not one of us can handle the responsibility of the first story that he told us that is officially produced. I advise you to delete this video and replace it with an apology to the individuals who watched this video.
Imagine paying money to listen to this.
I did
@@mattwall9003 Did you demand a refund?
What are you talking about? Obviously over your head
@@roxanahutchcroft1236 th-cam.com/video/uvC8IQnl-aY/w-d-xo.htmlsi=1jWHvd4lLqZgBN3Z
@@roxanahutchcroft1236 Yeah, I'm obviously too stupid to comprehend the genius of J.P. Only the enlightened ones like yourself are capable of understanding the complexity of his ideas.
This man is making insane amounts of cash by "preaching" on a religion he neither believes, follows, nor fully understands. I'm really tired of it.
The bible doesn’t belong to any one religion, it doesn’t even belong to religion per se, it is a book for all people. Everyone has a right to read it and try understand it and benefit from the lessons within.
@@Claire-cc7lb Show me where, in my comment, I said he doesn't have the right to "read it and try understand it and benefit from the lessons within."
@@Claire-cc7lbThe book is for salvation of souls; far far far far far more than a users manual.
Man does not live on bread (lessons) alone.
Then don't watch, nobody is forcing you too.
@@dknicely1AMEN!
Jordan is admitting he is being an entertainer, and not a therapist of a science. Jordan is a Frasier Crane wannabe. He is an entertainer not a psychologist. Because he sells books and videos and lectures, THAT IS NOT THERAPY. He needs to address his bad conduct in courts in the case of Case 1 Sordi v. Sordi, 2009 CanLII 80104 (ON SC) he defamed a parent in court. In the case 2 R. v. Pearce, 2012 MBQB 22 (CanLII) he tried to free a murderer. Then in the case Peterson v. College of Psychologists of Ontario, 2023 ONSC 4685, he tried to avoid taking responsibility. He also tried to interfere in a family court case in Montana, the Kolstadt case, where there was a GAG order, he unprofessionally diagnosed a minor without interviews or assessments, and tried to defend unfit parents.
Uh.. dudes not perfect, but there's no arguing the fact that he's influencing so many lives in a positive way. I think at the root of it all that's what's most important. Like him or not, he's doin something right, and it's probably a good idea to be open to what he has to say
@@styplaya First, we need scientific proof he has helped ANYONE. Second, it doesn't matter, his conduct was intentional, and he has NEVER said it was a mistake. Nor apologized for all of the damage he has caused. We need for him to "confess" his sins before we can forgive him. Third, what proof do you have that would prove he is not requiring you all to subjugate to a specific cultural behavior norms, and not acting with a universal approach proven to be effective?
@@stevengoldstein114 hm, that's my point, is at the root of everything he has to say, there seems to be a universal approach- that's to listen to the eternal goodness within (love, kindness, integrity, whatever). I'm not saying worship him, or even worship Christianity, nor is he
@@styplaya But his approach is not universal, He reverts to a Male / Female relationship model all the time, and refers to the Christian bible for his so called moral foundation. This makes him violate again the Code of Ethics in Canada and the US as a psychologist.
@@stevengoldstein114 right but I think you might take what he has to say about the Bible too literally. The truest foundation is God itself, and the Bible does a heck of a job pointing to it. The Bible is misinterpreted by mostly everyone including "good Christians" and he knows that, but chooses to utilize it anyway for what it really is meant to express. There's divinity within, and stories seem to represent that divinity. It's not a bad thing