Alisa Childers you are the kind of women we need in the world and I thank you. I don’t always agree with Christian women, but wow, God gave you a gift and thank you for using it for HIS kingdom and not your own.
NOPE. Alisa, if you're condemning "Christian Nationalism" - you are a PROGRESSIVE in sheep's clothing. The LORD told us in SCRIPTURE to seek and work for the good of the cities we live in. We are to LOVE them, not loathe them. Nothing wrong with Loving your country and seeking its well being as Scripture commanded us.
Thank you soo much sister🥰last year I read keezano’s Your Life Your Game, this book truly changed my life..lt beautifully shows how connecting with God and building meaningful relationships can lead to spiritual growth and success in both your personal and professional life. A must-read, hallelujah🙌🏼
Before I was a believer I was pretty much left leaning. After I became a believer my political beliefs moved to the right because when my morals changed that was the only result possible.
As an unbeliever, I studied philosophy and ended up a cynical, quasi-nihilist. A biblical worldview not only gives hope but a framework through which we see the world accurately.
This is SO true!! My brother converted to Orthodoxy about 12 years ago and although they claim to be historical I’ve noticed that ever since his conversion it’s been a slow progression of him and his family leaning more and more progressive and liberal!
@ it’s so sad to see!! Hank Hanegraaf the “Bible answer man” also converted to orthodoxy! I just feel so sad because they really deviate from the Biblical gospel and a lot of orthodox people don’t hold scripture with high regard, I’ve heard my nephew say & others in their orthodox camp that we shouldn’t be reading Paul’s letters and that Paul wasn’t writing to us or for us…. 😳😳 scary stuff when you’re trying to take Paul out of the Bible!
@@Post-Trib I not 100% sure but they claim to have apostolic succession but I would assume that the original apostles would have believed scripture and held it as the highest standard & they also accepted Paul as an apostle…. I’m sure there’s different types of Orthodoxy so not all of them are the same but the majority of them differ on the gospel, the Bible, church authority, and they even disagree with Protestants about the atonement! (I haven’t dived to deep on there thoughts on the atonement but I’ve heard a few highly respected orthodox people say things like what was Christ atoning for? And what was His work on the cross for? That one is also scary! It’s such a fundamental belief of Christianity that Christ died to atone for our sins on the Cross!!
@CountryThreadsbyhand if there's no such thing as orthodox, then nobody has it or everyone has it. It's ridiculous how some claim to be orthodox and the continuation of the NT church when their doctrine is unorthodox and man-made
My own personal experience follows that pattern. The progressive Christians I know “deconstructed” by first a shift in their politics & ethics (in a couple of cases a child coming out as queer, in one case TDS causing a complete transformation in political opinion) and then transforming their theology to fit their new political paradigm. I, personally, have not met a progressive Christian who started shifting their theology first. That being said I do know a few people who tend to be very left wing politically, but conservatives theologically.
My son and daughter-in-law are conservative but go to a progressive Methodist church. I have tried to change them without success because my daughter-in-law has always been a Methodist and will always be a Methodist.
I was baptized confirmed and married in the Episcopal Church. I’m 63, and left the church about 10 years ago because they stopped teaching the word of god!!!
i kept seeing people in youtube comments and even a few friends talking about this book, and i was like, what’s all the hype about? i wasn’t even gonna bother, but after hearing about it so much, i gave in. Magnetic Aura by takeshi mizuki wasn’t easy to find, but wow, it was worth it. after just two weeks, my dating life completely turned around, money started flowing in ways i never expected, and i feel more confident than ever. i didn’t think a book could actually do that, but here we are
I attend a large conservative church, not a mega church but has about 1500 attendees on Sunday, broken up into 3 services. One Sunday last fall, in the parking lot while on my way in a gentleman called me over to his car. He proceeded to speak of various things, his 11 years as a member, occupation, prayer life etc. All fine and good until he said he wanted to show me a picture of his gal. I was taken back when he showed Kamala on his phone ! At that point I just politely disagreed and headed in the church. It was getting late and didn't want to get into a Q& A with him. I thought about it later and just could not understand how someone who attended this church that long could possibly vote for someone who supports abortion and LBJTQ ? Has he been listening to the sermons or read it's statement of beliefs? The church is pro life and believes in love for LBJTQ, but marriage is between male and female and there are only two genders. Very strange that I haven't seen this fellow since.
I came to comment the same. If they are putting politics first they are no longer Christian. Giving this group the title of “Progressive Christians” is misleading
I find that the VAST majority of the progressive Christians that I know derive their theology from Micah 6:8. This leads them to develop a system of belief that, then, needs to identify "injustices" in the world in order to act justly and to identify areas where "mercy" should be enacted, etc. It's incredibly empathetic, but also conveniently subjective. This is the heart and soul of most of the progs I know. It's subjective and yet usurps most of the law and the need for Christ's atoning work.
New Covenant Whole Gospel: How many modern Christians cannot honestly answer the questions below? Who is the King of Israel in John 1:49? Is the King of Israel now the Head of the Church, and are we His Body? Who is the “son” that is the “heir” to the land in Matthew 21:37-43? Why did God allow the Romans to destroy the Old Covenant temple and the Old Covenant city, about 40 years after His Son fulfilled the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34 in blood at Calvary? What the modern Church needs is a New Covenant Revival (Heb. 9:10) in which members of various denominations are willing to re-examine everything they believe and see if it agrees with the Bible, instead of the traditions of men. We need to be like the Bereans. It will be a battle between our flesh and the Holy Spirit. It will not be easy. If you get mad and upset when someone challenges your man-made Bible doctrines, that is your flesh resisting the truth found in God's Word. Nobody can completely understand the Bible unless they understand the relationship between the Old Covenant given to Moses at Mount Sinai and the New Covenant fulfilled in blood at Calvary. God is not now a “racist”. He has extended His love to all races of people through the New Covenant fulfilled by His Son’s blood at Calvary. The Apostle Paul warned against using “genealogies” in our faith in 1 Tim. 1:4, and Titus 3:9. If the New Covenant is "everlasting" in Hebrews 13:20 and the Old Covenant is "obsolete" in Hebrews 8:13, why would any Christian believe God is going back to the Old Covenant system during a future time period? What brings all local churches together into one Body under the blood of Christ? The answer is found below. Let us now share the Old Testament Gospel found below with the whole world. On the road to Emmaus He said the Old Testament is about Him. He is the very Word of God in John 1:1, 14. Awaken Church to this truth. Jer 31:31 Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah: Jer 31:32 Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by husband unto them, saith the LORD: Jer 31:33 But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people. Jer 31:34 And they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the LORD: for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the LORD: for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more. Is the most important genealogy in the Bible found in Matthew 1:1 (Gal. 3:16)? Is God's Son the ultimate fulfillment of Israel (John 1:49)? Why has the modern Church done a pitiful job of sharing the Gospel with modern Orthodox Jews? Why would someone tell them they are God's chosen people and then fail to share the Gospel with them? Who is the seed of the woman promised in Genesis 3:15? What did Paul say about Genesis 12:3 in Galatians 3:8, 3:16? Who is the "son" in Psalm 2? Who is the "suffering servant" of Isaiah 53? Who would fulfill the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34? Who would fulfill the timeline of Daniel chapter 9 before the second temple was destroyed? Why have we not heard this simple Old Testament Gospel preached on Christian television in the United States on a regular basis? Once a person comes to understand the New Covenant promised to Israel and Judah in Jeremiah 31:31-34, which is found fulfilled by Christ during the first century in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 10:16-18, and specifically applied to the Church in 2 Corinthians 3:6-8, and Hebrews 12:22-24, man-made Bible doctrines fall apart. Let us now learn to preach the whole Gospel until He comes back. The King of Israel is risen from the dead! (John 1:49, Acts 2:36) We are not come to Mount Sinai in Hebrews 12:18. We are come instead to the New Covenant church of Mount Zion and the blood in Hebrews 12:22-24. 1Jn 3:22 And whatsoever we ask, we receive of him, because we keep his commandments, and do those things that are pleasing in his sight. 1Jn 3:23 And this is his commandment, That we should believe on the name of his Son Jesus Christ, and love one another, as he gave us commandment. 1Jn 3:24 And he that keepeth his commandments dwelleth in him, and he in him. And hereby we know that he abideth in us, by the Spirit which he hath given us. The following verses prove the Holy Spirit is the master teacher for those now in the New Covenant. Jer 31:34 And they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the LORD: for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the LORD: for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more. Mar 1:8 I indeed have baptized you with water: but he shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost. Joh 14:26 But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you. Act 11:16 Then remembered I the word of the Lord, how that he said, John indeed baptized with water; but ye shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost. 1Co 12:13 For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and have been all made to drink into one Spirit. 1Jn 2:27 But the anointing which ye have received of him abideth in you, and ye need not that any man teach you: but as the same anointing teacheth you of all things, and is truth, and is no lie, and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in him. Watch the TH-cam videos “The New Covenant” by David Wilkerson, or Bob George, and David H.J. Gay.
Re abortion . An earnest question Alisa ; hypothetically , if the medical prognosis of someone you loved dearly was inevitable death unless their pregnancy was terminated , would you believe that then abortion is morally justified or not ?
I so love your channel. But i must confess i do admire and respect another Melissa Daugherty who discusses "new age" and "new thought" . Not sure if you have heard of her but i would love to see you both together discussing your views. Much Respect.
Progressive or liberal Christians tend to state that the sum of Jesus teachings are love, peace, justice. So if you hear these words you know where their theology comes from.
If progressive Christianity and the "left" are as monolithic as you suggest, the "right" and Conservative Christianity must be as well. You have created a false dichotomy.
1. The reality is that God has created trillions of trillions of planets spread across trillions of trillions of galaxies. Based on this fact, the biggest possibility is that God also created other creatures with high intelligence besides humans who live scattered on other planets. For example, there is creature A, creature B, creature C living on planet A, planet B, planet C. My question... Who is the God of these other creatures? What form does this creature God take, is it the human form of Jesus, son of Mary, or the incarnation of creature A, creature B, creature C or what form? 2. Isaiah 34:4 God will roll up the heavens like a scroll, Jeremiah 23:24 God will fill the heavens and the earth, Chronicles 6:18 the heavens and the heavens cannot contain God. Acts 17:28 For in God we live, we move.... Based on the four verses above, is God bigger than the universe or smaller than the universe or only less than two meters in size? 3. According to science, the age of the universe has reached more than 13.5 billion years. According to historians, Adam and Eve only existed about thousands of years ago. Based on the discovery of many fossils, according to scientists, 250 million years ago there were dinosaurs and there were no humans. My question... What was Jesus doing billions of years before humans existed? What did Jesus do during the time of the dinosaurs? What is your God job/doing? Please answer me.
Hey Alisa! I appreciate folks like yourself and Frank doing apologetics and helping to curb some of the cultural challenges. Unfortunately, I do have some issues with some of your uses of the term "progressive" at times, although there's much i would definitely agree with. I would also consider myself and others similar to me to be very much conservative both, theologically and politically. You've previously used the term progressive a bit haphazardly to label those who deny Original sin as such. I believe you've said the same about PSA. I don't recall you having made statements on Total Depravity, but i have picked up on the fact that you're a calvinist and I believe there's some bias theologically. But I'm not trying to have a discussion on the problems of calvinism at the moment. The point is wanted to make is that Eastern Orthodox and Anabaptists reject some of those same doctrines and aren't themselves called "progressive". I believe there are good scriptural reasons why those doctrines are false as well as the fact that the majority of the early Church fathers from the first 300ish years didn't believe these doctrines. I've seen your interview with Ken Samples about Augustine and I frankly disagree Ken a decent amount. @Idolkiller has a response video going over your discussion with Ken in regards to Original Sin. I believe Augustine corrupted a huge portion of the church with many false teachings as well as his horrible lies about folks like Pelagius. Dr Ali Bonner has done some scholarship on this particular issue. (I would also reject pelagianism and semi-pelagianism btw) I find that many of the issues with theology comes down to translation and interpretation of scripture. While the early church fathers are not infallible and didn't always agree on everything, their writings are very valuable in understanding what the early church believed so close to Christ himself and the Apostles. I would argue that's far more conservative than following later interpretations and "progressive revelations" of scripture.
Trying to analyze who is cursed the best is a waste of time. What came first to Religion, the Bank account or the Book? Religion is like Honey; it doesn't make the Honey, but it knows how to Profit from who did. When will you people wake up...
Alissa, my biggest concern with conservative Christians is we are just as "politically based" as progressives are. We have decided that since Donald Trump agrees with our political beliefs he is a staunch Christian. We are twisting our political beliefs to be the foundation of Christianity. I agree with the vast majority of Trump's political views. But, I think way too many Christians view him as "God's chosen man to lead America back to God."
There are fundamentalist and Evangelical Christians who are on the Left politically as bizarre as that can seem. Polls find that about 20% of each branch of orthodox Protestants identify as left liberals. I have come across these folks myself. I attended Bob Jones University. Most students there were not very political. Those who were tended to be moderate Republicans, not hard-core conservatives. So, most of the students I heard express a view on the candidates in the 1976 election supported Gerald Ford over Ronald Reagan. That might have been so because the bulk of the students at BJU at that time were from the Midwest and Northeast, not the South as someone not familiar with BJU might think. These Midwesterners included a lot of people from Michigan, Ford's home state. Bob Jones II and III did not support Reagan in 76 nor in 1980 but instead supported John Connolly in 80. Then there were those who held very left liberal positions on a range of issues especially race. I was taken aback by how far to the left many were even though they were liberals, not Marxists. I came across such folks again when I tried MySpace and joined a BJU Alumni group. They were ferocious in their commitment to left liberal causes, this time especially feminism. Btw, I preferred MySpace to Facebook. I am sorry MySpace faded out.
Alisa Childers you are the kind of women we need in the world and I thank you.
I don’t always agree with Christian women, but wow, God gave you a gift and thank you for using it for HIS kingdom and not your own.
NOPE. Alisa, if you're condemning "Christian Nationalism" - you are a PROGRESSIVE in sheep's clothing. The LORD told us in SCRIPTURE to seek and work for the good of the cities we live in. We are to LOVE them, not loathe them. Nothing wrong with Loving your country and seeking its well being as Scripture commanded us.
how to spot it? it is an excess of _empathy_ and a total disregard for scriptural definitions of sin.
Hard to justify the need for a Savior when you can't acknowledge man's problem with sin; now isn't it?
"excess of empathy" in a world that lacks empathy isn't a bad thing.
@@KeithGarrett-w1t Except when that empathy is conflated with a tolerance for sin.
@@KeithGarrett-w1t💯
@@KeithGarrett-w1t ok lady thanks
Thank you soo much sister🥰last year I read keezano’s Your Life Your Game, this book truly changed my life..lt beautifully shows how connecting with God and building meaningful relationships can lead to spiritual growth and success in both your personal and professional life. A must-read, hallelujah🙌🏼
Before I was a believer I was pretty much left leaning. After I became a believer my political beliefs moved to the right because when my morals changed that was the only result possible.
As an unbeliever, I studied philosophy and ended up a cynical, quasi-nihilist. A biblical worldview not only gives hope but a framework through which we see the world accurately.
Progressive Christianity ethics comes down to "the ends justify the means."
This is SO true!! My brother converted to Orthodoxy about 12 years ago and although they claim to be historical I’ve noticed that ever since his conversion it’s been a slow progression of him and his family leaning more and more progressive and liberal!
That happened with Frankie Schaffer
@ it’s so sad to see!! Hank Hanegraaf the “Bible answer man” also converted to orthodoxy!
I just feel so sad because they really deviate from the Biblical gospel and a lot of orthodox people don’t hold scripture with high regard, I’ve heard my nephew say & others in their orthodox camp that we shouldn’t be reading Paul’s letters and that Paul wasn’t writing to us or for us…. 😳😳 scary stuff when you’re trying to take Paul out of the Bible!
What is orthodox today compared to the actual orthodox of the Bible as the jews & NT church declared?
@@Post-Trib I not 100% sure but they claim to have apostolic succession but I would assume that the original apostles would have believed scripture and held it as the highest standard & they also accepted Paul as an apostle…. I’m sure there’s different types of Orthodoxy so not all of them are the same but the majority of them differ on the gospel, the Bible, church authority, and they even disagree with Protestants about the atonement! (I haven’t dived to deep on there thoughts on the atonement but I’ve heard a few highly respected orthodox people say things like what was Christ atoning for? And what was His work on the cross for?
That one is also scary! It’s such a fundamental belief of Christianity that Christ died to atone for our sins on the Cross!!
@CountryThreadsbyhand if there's no such thing as orthodox, then nobody has it or everyone has it. It's ridiculous how some claim to be orthodox and the continuation of the NT church when their doctrine is unorthodox and man-made
My own personal experience follows that pattern. The progressive Christians I know “deconstructed” by first a shift in their politics & ethics (in a couple of cases a child coming out as queer, in one case TDS causing a complete transformation in political opinion) and then transforming their theology to fit their new political paradigm. I, personally, have not met a progressive Christian who started shifting their theology first.
That being said I do know a few people who tend to be very left wing politically, but conservatives theologically.
Very good Alisa! Spot on!
My son and daughter-in-law are conservative but go to a progressive Methodist church. I have tried to change them without success because my daughter-in-law has always been a Methodist and will always be a Methodist.
I was baptized confirmed and married in the Episcopal Church. I’m 63, and left the church about 10 years ago because they stopped teaching the word of god!!!
i kept seeing people in youtube comments and even a few friends talking about this book, and i was like, what’s all the hype about? i wasn’t even gonna bother, but after hearing about it so much, i gave in. Magnetic Aura by takeshi mizuki wasn’t easy to find, but wow, it was worth it. after just two weeks, my dating life completely turned around, money started flowing in ways i never expected, and i feel more confident than ever. i didn’t think a book could actually do that, but here we are
But it is hardly Biblical.
I attend a large conservative church, not a mega church but has about 1500 attendees on Sunday, broken up into 3 services. One Sunday last fall, in the parking lot while on my way in a gentleman called me over to his car. He proceeded to speak of various things, his 11 years as a member, occupation, prayer life etc. All fine and good until he said he wanted to show me a picture of his gal. I was taken back when he showed Kamala on his phone ! At that point I just politely disagreed and headed in the church. It was getting late and didn't want to get into a Q& A with him.
I thought about it later and just could not understand how someone who attended this church that long could possibly vote for someone who supports abortion and LBJTQ ? Has he been listening to the sermons or read it's statement of beliefs? The church is pro life and believes in love for LBJTQ, but marriage is between male and female and there are only two genders. Very strange that I haven't seen this fellow since.
Can we stop using their language which calls it Progressive Christianity and call it for what it is - The World?
It likely comes from the turn of the 19 - 20th century progressive political movement.
I came to comment the same. If they are putting politics first they are no longer Christian. Giving this group the title of “Progressive Christians” is misleading
When People saying that Jesus came to accomplish something entirely different to what he himself said about his mission
Mathew 13:33 these three measures of meal with leaven hidden in them have leavened the whole sphere of thought.
Nailed it 🎯
I find that the VAST majority of the progressive Christians that I know derive their theology from Micah 6:8. This leads them to develop a system of belief that, then, needs to identify "injustices" in the world in order to act justly and to identify areas where "mercy" should be enacted, etc. It's incredibly empathetic, but also conveniently subjective. This is the heart and soul of most of the progs I know. It's subjective and yet usurps most of the law and the need for Christ's atoning work.
The unholy triangle that is akin to their trinity.
The doctrine of the trinity is the root cause of their corruption
Read Dr. Wayne Grudem's book on "Evangelical Feminism".
1. Antinomianism, 2. Antinomianism, 3. Antinomianism
Bless your heart.
Can you support any part of this discourse biblically, at all???
New Covenant Whole Gospel: How many modern Christians cannot honestly answer the questions below?
Who is the King of Israel in John 1:49? Is the King of Israel now the Head of the Church, and are we His Body? Who is the “son” that is the “heir” to the land in Matthew 21:37-43? Why did God allow the Romans to destroy the Old Covenant temple and the Old Covenant city, about 40 years after His Son fulfilled the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34 in blood at Calvary?
What the modern Church needs is a New Covenant Revival (Heb. 9:10) in which members of various denominations are willing to re-examine everything they believe and see if it agrees with the Bible, instead of the traditions of men. We need to be like the Bereans. It will be a battle between our flesh and the Holy Spirit. It will not be easy. If you get mad and upset when someone challenges your man-made Bible doctrines, that is your flesh resisting the truth found in God's Word. Nobody can completely understand the Bible unless they understand the relationship between the Old Covenant given to Moses at Mount Sinai and the New Covenant fulfilled in blood at Calvary.
God is not now a “racist”. He has extended His love to all races of people through the New Covenant fulfilled by His Son’s blood at Calvary. The Apostle Paul warned against using “genealogies” in our faith in 1 Tim. 1:4, and Titus 3:9.
If the New Covenant is "everlasting" in Hebrews 13:20 and the Old Covenant is "obsolete" in Hebrews 8:13, why would any Christian believe God is going back to the Old Covenant system during a future time period?
What brings all local churches together into one Body under the blood of Christ? The answer is found below.
Let us now share the Old Testament Gospel found below with the whole world. On the road to Emmaus He said the Old Testament is about Him.
He is the very Word of God in John 1:1, 14. Awaken Church to this truth.
Jer 31:31 Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah:
Jer 31:32 Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by husband unto them, saith the LORD:
Jer 31:33 But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people.
Jer 31:34 And they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the LORD: for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the LORD: for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more.
Is the most important genealogy in the Bible found in Matthew 1:1 (Gal. 3:16)? Is God's Son the ultimate fulfillment of Israel (John 1:49)? Why has the modern Church done a pitiful job of sharing the Gospel with modern Orthodox Jews? Why would someone tell them they are God's chosen people and then fail to share the Gospel with them? Who is the seed of the woman promised in Genesis 3:15? What did Paul say about Genesis 12:3 in Galatians 3:8, 3:16? Who is the "son" in Psalm 2? Who is the "suffering servant" of Isaiah 53? Who would fulfill the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34? Who would fulfill the timeline of Daniel chapter 9 before the second temple was destroyed? Why have we not heard this simple Old Testament Gospel preached on Christian television in the United States on a regular basis?
Once a person comes to understand the New Covenant promised to Israel and Judah in Jeremiah 31:31-34, which is found fulfilled by Christ during the first century in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 10:16-18, and specifically applied to the Church in 2 Corinthians 3:6-8, and Hebrews 12:22-24, man-made Bible doctrines fall apart.
Let us now learn to preach the whole Gospel until He comes back. The King of Israel is risen from the dead! (John 1:49, Acts 2:36)
We are not come to Mount Sinai in Hebrews 12:18. We are come instead to the New Covenant church of Mount Zion and the blood in Hebrews 12:22-24.
1Jn 3:22 And whatsoever we ask, we receive of him, because we keep his commandments, and do those things that are pleasing in his sight.
1Jn 3:23 And this is his commandment, That we should believe on the name of his Son Jesus Christ, and love one another, as he gave us commandment.
1Jn 3:24 And he that keepeth his commandments dwelleth in him, and he in him. And hereby we know that he abideth in us, by the Spirit which he hath given us.
The following verses prove the Holy Spirit is the master teacher for those now in the New Covenant.
Jer 31:34 And they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the LORD: for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the LORD: for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more.
Mar 1:8 I indeed have baptized you with water: but he shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost.
Joh 14:26 But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.
Act 11:16 Then remembered I the word of the Lord, how that he said, John indeed baptized with water; but ye shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost.
1Co 12:13 For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and have been all made to drink into one Spirit.
1Jn 2:27 But the anointing which ye have received of him abideth in you, and ye need not that any man teach you: but as the same anointing teacheth you of all things, and is truth, and is no lie, and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in him.
Watch the TH-cam videos “The New Covenant” by David Wilkerson, or Bob George, and David H.J. Gay.
Re abortion . An earnest question Alisa ; hypothetically , if the medical prognosis of someone you loved dearly was inevitable death unless their pregnancy was terminated , would you believe that then abortion is morally justified or not ?
Always the question when these cases are so rare the world renowned OBGYN's say they do not know of such cases.
I so love your channel. But i must confess i do admire and respect another Melissa Daugherty who discusses "new age" and "new thought" . Not sure if you have heard of her but i would love to see you both together discussing your views. Much Respect.
She just had Melissa on her channel. Look back to a recent video and you should find it. I really like Melissa Dougherty!
@@katiepcleans thanks I will. I corrected my error in the spelling of her last name.
Progressive or liberal Christians tend to state that the sum of Jesus teachings are love, peace, justice. So if you hear these words you know where their theology comes from.
These 3 joining make an Image to the Beast Rome.
If progressive Christianity and the "left" are as monolithic as you suggest, the "right" and Conservative Christianity must be as well. You have created a false dichotomy.
1. The reality is that God has created trillions of trillions of planets spread across trillions of trillions of galaxies. Based on this fact, the biggest possibility is that God also created other creatures with high intelligence besides humans who live scattered on other planets. For example, there is creature A, creature B, creature C living on planet A, planet B, planet C. My question... Who is the God of these other creatures? What form does this creature God take, is it the human form of Jesus, son of Mary, or the incarnation of creature A, creature B, creature C or what form? 2. Isaiah 34:4 God will roll up the heavens like a scroll, Jeremiah 23:24 God will fill the heavens and the earth, Chronicles 6:18 the heavens and the heavens cannot contain God. Acts 17:28 For in God we live, we move.... Based on the four verses above, is God bigger than the universe or smaller than the universe or only less than two meters in size? 3. According to science, the age of the universe has reached more than 13.5 billion years. According to historians, Adam and Eve only existed about thousands of years ago. Based on the discovery of many fossils, according to scientists, 250 million years ago there were dinosaurs and there were no humans. My question... What was Jesus doing billions of years before humans existed? What did Jesus do during the time of the dinosaurs? What is your God job/doing? Please answer me.
Hey Alisa! I appreciate folks like yourself and Frank doing apologetics and helping to curb some of the cultural challenges.
Unfortunately, I do have some issues with some of your uses of the term "progressive" at times, although there's much i would definitely agree with. I would also consider myself and others similar to me to be very much conservative both, theologically and politically.
You've previously used the term progressive a bit haphazardly to label those who deny Original sin as such. I believe you've said the same about PSA.
I don't recall you having made statements on Total Depravity, but i have picked up on the fact that you're a calvinist and I believe there's some bias theologically. But I'm not trying to have a discussion on the problems of calvinism at the moment.
The point is wanted to make is that Eastern Orthodox and Anabaptists reject some of those same doctrines and aren't themselves called "progressive". I believe there are good scriptural reasons why those doctrines are false as well as the fact that the majority of the early Church fathers from the first 300ish years didn't believe these doctrines.
I've seen your interview with Ken Samples about Augustine and I frankly disagree Ken a decent amount. @Idolkiller has a response video going over your discussion with Ken in regards to Original Sin.
I believe Augustine corrupted a huge portion of the church with many false teachings as well as his horrible lies about folks like Pelagius. Dr Ali Bonner has done some scholarship on this particular issue. (I would also reject pelagianism and semi-pelagianism btw)
I find that many of the issues with theology comes down to translation and interpretation of scripture. While the early church fathers are not infallible and didn't always agree on everything, their writings are very valuable in understanding what the early church believed so close to Christ himself and the Apostles. I would argue that's far more conservative than following later interpretations and "progressive revelations" of scripture.
Triangle
Don't worry, Alisa. According the Catholic TH-camrs, everybody, atheists AND Protestants, are all becoming traditionalist Catholics.
@@mashah1085 they need to start with converting their Pope
@@conceptualclarity Seems Protestants need to also figure out if supporting clearly immoral leaders in politics aligns with their "Christian values"?
Your claims are easily applicable to many conservative Christians, too.
Trying to analyze who is cursed the best is a waste of time. What came first to Religion, the Bank account or the Book? Religion is like Honey; it doesn't make the Honey, but it knows how to Profit from who did. When will you people wake up...
Who sides with human rights* more? Progressives or conservatives?
*UN declaration of Human Rights
@@js1423 it is progressives throughout the Western world who are seeking to suppress free speech and throw dissidents in jail
Number 1.
Women preachers
Alissa, my biggest concern with conservative Christians is we are just as "politically based" as progressives are. We have decided that since Donald Trump agrees with our political beliefs he is a staunch Christian. We are twisting our political beliefs to be the foundation of Christianity. I agree with the vast majority of Trump's political views. But, I think way too many Christians view him as "God's chosen man to lead America back to God."
I'm not familiar with anyone thinking President Trump's a Christian.
There are fundamentalist and Evangelical Christians who are on the Left politically as bizarre as that can seem. Polls find that about 20% of each branch of orthodox Protestants identify as left liberals. I have come across these folks myself. I attended Bob Jones University. Most students there were not very political. Those who were tended to be moderate Republicans, not hard-core conservatives. So, most of the students I heard express a view on the candidates in the 1976 election supported Gerald Ford over Ronald Reagan. That might have been so because the bulk of the students at BJU at that time were from the Midwest and Northeast, not the South as someone not familiar with BJU might think. These Midwesterners included a lot of people from Michigan, Ford's home state. Bob Jones II and III did not support Reagan in 76 nor in 1980 but instead supported John Connolly in 80. Then there were those who held very left liberal positions on a range of issues especially race. I was taken aback by how far to the left many were even though they were liberals, not Marxists.
I came across such folks again when I tried MySpace and joined a BJU Alumni group. They were ferocious in their commitment to left liberal causes, this time especially feminism. Btw, I preferred MySpace to Facebook. I am sorry MySpace faded out.