He listed the first, second and fourth time this happened. The third time this type of event happened was when certain types of protists, specifically eukaryotic cells, took in a red or green alga. This process, known as secondary endosymbiosis, allowed these protists to acquire photosynthetic capabilities by engulfing algae that already contained chloroplasts from a previous primary endosymbiosis event. This third endosymbiotic event didn’t produce a whole new class of life but instead allowed certain protists, like Euglena and other algae, to perform photosynthesis and spread across various ecological niches.
"... protists, specifically eukaryotic cells" What? All protists are eukaryotes. Protists are just any eukaryotes apart from animals, land plants and fungi.
Thanks for filling in the GIGANTIC HOLE this guy left in the story, sure he only has so much time but at least mention it. And so we come to your comment, picking up the slack, recovering the fumble and running it in for a score. Well done sir well done, i was just hoping someone was nerdy enough to know and comment on this. My excuse is I went aerospace engineering, not exactly a ton of biology in there.
The last time this happened, actually each time it did, it caused a massive worldwide die off every time in a short period of time with survivors and new forms of life advancing in the new biom over millions of years.
@@polonyuino5016Yeah, its supposedly gonna be hot enough to boil our oceans in a billion years lol, though were either already dead or on another planet by then and will most likely bring life with us and this one in particular could be quite useful
Cooperation is vastly more common in nature than competition. That's how multicellularity works, after all. We've just largely failed to acknowledge that because the guy who discovered evolution was a wealthy white male Victorian British citizen - exactly the kind of person who would only see violence in nature because his mere existence required so much of it. The ideology of empire, permanently imprinted upon an entire field of science.
@@Frommerman well you're not wrong. But there are issues of renormalization and coarse-graining involved in your argument that would certainly affect the discussion of cooperation and competition.
@@acisverycoolhopefully they bring the cut content "dinosaurs" and actually add it to the game instead of letting it sit in the files . Atp I'm begging for a new biome or new animal
I dont think its a new domain as the papers classify the algae as a eukaryote still, maybe a new Kingdom? Then again biologists at that level tend not to use the Linnaean classification system anymore or even the 3 Domain System and instead use cladistics.
It’s pretty funny that the algae is now a eukaryote powered by a prokaryote, fueled by another prokaryote making energy through the byproduct of ANOTHER projaryote. Karyote …ception?
Here is a scientific view point on how evolution has gaps in how it does not work or prove how everything started. In the scientific point if view the first thing about the evolution of life supposedly started 2,500,000,000 years ago in the ocean, the first life from "the cell" one sinlge cell you cant see, evolved and became alll the life on earth, the ostrich, elephant, Venus fly trap, crabs, bears, humans... Ect, trace back to the first cell 2.5 billion years ago. Now about the flaw i can point out that made me stop believing in evolution, so the first cell to exist, only life produces other life, something we all learn in biology class. It does not make since that a complicated dna stran fomed its self, that alone takes a miracle that life "appeared" these cells would start working together and evolve/fuse into fish and then became all the other animals. The problem with this is for animals, you need both male and female, single celled organisms tend to only be asexual or all if them are female and they self replicate. How would asexual beings involving 0 sexual relations, combine together and create a very complicated male reproductive system and a very very complicated female reproductive system? Asexual creatures would not both evole two complicated sets of body parts independenly from each other to make multiple cellular life possible. My point is, with how complicated the jump is from only cells to animals is such a huge massive change evolution its self can not prove or explain it. The only way i would believe it is if male and female was created with intelligent design for each other. Thats what technically happenes with God, it makes it reasonable to believe it to come, but random chance can not bring male and female
@@eldermillennial8330Well all somatic cells contain copies of the body's DNA. The mitochondria possess its own set of DNA. Suggesting that it is/was its own organism. If it was an organelle the DNA for the mitochondria would just be with all the other DNA for the body
@@eldermillennial8330 It's both. When you ask "what part of the cell is this?" you get "it's an organelle which means a little organ. When you ask "why is it the way it is?" you get to the endosymbiotic theory. But it's not an organism in itself anymore after it became a part of a bigger thing.
I guess it was kind of inevitable. 70% of earths atmosphere is Nitrogen. It does open a fair few interesting metabolic pathways for life to take advantage of.
There are dozens of nitrogen based metabolisms, but they require you usually to expend most of your evolution points towards it cause you pretty complex cellular enzymes and compartments, and they also are generally low energy output. But with organelle evolution, like the chloroplast, we might see some interesting development
@@ssm-sf8byYup. Many land plants, for example, have nitrogen-fixing bacteria among their roots. If they had nitroplasts, they could cut them out of the middle and become potentially VASTLY more effective and grow ridiculously! Water and nitrates are their biggest bottlenecks! They get carbon and oxygen from the air, water from the ground, and energy from light!
The marine algae in question is **Rhopalodia gibba,** a type of diatom. Rhopalodia gibba is known for hosting endosymbiotic cyanobacteria, which can fix atmospheric nitrogen into ammonia, thus providing the diatom with an essential nutrient. Scientists have been critical of this "discovery" for several reasons: 1. **Misinterpretation of Symbiosis**: Some early reports suggested that Rhopalodia gibba "swallowed" bacteria, implying a more permanent and integrative process akin to the origin of mitochondria and chloroplasts. Critics argue that this mischaracterizes the relationship, which is more accurately described as an endosymbiosis, where the cyanobacteria live inside the diatom but remain distinct entities. 2. **Complexity of Symbiotic Relationships**: The symbiotic relationship between Rhopalodia gibba and the cyanobacteria is complex and highly specialized. Critics point out that simplifying this relationship to a mere "swallowing" overlooks the physiological adaptations required for such a symbiosis to function effectively. 3. **Genetic and Functional Integration**: The notion of one organism swallowing another and integrating it into its cellular machinery as a permanent feature involves significant genetic and functional integration. Critics emphasize that in the case of Rhopalodia gibba, the cyanobacteria maintain their own genetic identity and are not fully integrated into the host diatom’s cellular processes in the same way as organelles like mitochondria. 4. **Evidence and Documentation**: Some skepticism arises from the evidence and documentation provided in studies claiming such symbiotic events. Critics demand rigorous, reproducible evidence to support claims of such significant evolutionary events, and they caution against drawing premature conclusions from preliminary findings. In summary, while the endosymbiotic relationship in Rhopalodia gibba is fascinating and significant, scientists emphasize the importance of accurately describing the nature of this relationship and caution against over-simplifying or misinterpreting the biological processes involved.
I wonder if that's possible. N2 is extremely stable (it's why nitrogen is used to provide an inert atmosphere for many chemical reactions), so if it was going to metabolize actual N2 I think it would have to be with pure lithium metal, which I think would be extremely unlikely for an organism to possess as part of its body. Maybe there's some other way it could be done, like with electricity.
Hello! This is awesome news. You seem like someone interested in cool biology. I'm reading symbiotic planet by Lynn margulis and it makes the argument that endosymbiosis happens all the time (that it's actually largely how evolution proceeds). Just thought you might find that cool! (And it's a great book!)
not a microbiologist.... the is very cool annd kind of scary. imagine this new algae replaced the current algae in plants the world over because those new plants vastly out competed our current plants. this would mean unused ammonia would be dissolved into plants in higher concentrations? would that be a problem for consumption?
@@Kryso_0 ammonia will never be in excess unless its in food...what i mean is ammonia is a great way to ship hydrogen fuel because (and i know it sounds unintuitive) liquid ammonia can store more hydrogen in the same size tank as just pure hydrogen and much safer to transport
Hello everyone Here are the update logs for the update 1.37 -added new lifeforms -added new zone in the map -patched gamebreaking glitch (the one that let monkeys clip through walls) -buffed human knowledge by 1% -nerfed corona virus (death chance 1% --> 0.2%) -added new disease (secret so no spoilers) Next update will be a big update our devs are actively working on it but because of all the other planets we are working on the update might get delayed by a few decades.
The four known primary endosymbiosis events are mitochondria in eukaryotes, chloroplasts in archaeplastids (plants, "green algae", "red algae", etc), and then two separate instances involving nitroplasts. One happened in certain diatoms, the other is in this video. These guys aren't super closely related to each other or plants, but they are part of a much bigger group containing archaeplastids, though on the "opposite" side. Diatoms are very closely related to "brown algae" (like kelp) and the one in this video, a haptophyte, is a pretty distant relative, but still closer to diatoms than to plants. Basically "algae" is a very general term for a huge group of plant-like eukaryotes, both microscopic and visible, and they did lots of endosymbiosis. There are other endosymbiosis events, but they were not primary. So they might involve trapping a cell that has trapped another cell, or even going another layer deep
It’s just a reclassification. This is from the 2024 nature article: “But in the latest study, Zehr and his colleagues conclude that UCYN-A (the bacteria) should be classed as organelles inside the algae, rather than as a separate organism. According to genetic analysis from a previous study, ancestors of the algae and bacteria entered a symbiotic relationship around 100 million years ago, says Zehr. Eventually, this gave rise to the nitroplast organelle, now seen in B. bigelowii.” He’s making it sound like scientists just witnessed this event.
Exactly! Furthermore, their article in Cell underlines that the symbiosis is unstable in certain conditions & that the gene transfer from one organism to another hasn’t been proven yet!
Thank you for an intelligent comment with a source! But yea I have to say it made me a tad sceptical on how it was phrased as having just seen it happening. Also just given the fact that something like this is so beneficial that i would have to imagine it isn't the first time but maybe the first evidence. Alot of times algae or microorganisms don't leave the best fossil records but given the fact that from that first event happening till now we've had a soup of algae and bacteria mixing around in the environment that takes up roughly 70% of the planet i think the odds are slim that this might not have happened before at some point. Fixing nitrogen is just too advantageous.
@@funtourhawk the video presented it as if we were witnessing an endosymbiosis event (a cell engulfing a cell to become one organism) but in reality it’s simply a common occurrence in biology where two organism coexist and work together to gain mutual benefits! Just *a* symbiosis!
@@valaamis Keyword, "yet". It's kind of assumed to be a given, but because the scientific process is what it is, it cannot be supported until it is directly witnessed. Just because it's a declaration and not a discovery doesn't make it any less exciting. The same thing goes for declaring the extinction of a species. It typically happens decades, even a century after the last sighting, but that doesn't make it any less tragic. Furthermore, independent research by Francisco M. Cornejo-Castillo, et al from the highly esteemed science journal "Cell", has shown that the previous symbiosis between algae and prokaryotic bacteria had constrained the size of the host organism, as the bacteria could only fix so much nitrogen to fuel the cell. But as an organelle, that limitation no longer exists. Much like the rise of complex plant and animal life, this opens up the potential for complex, self-sustaining life in the distant future.
this has happened hundreds probably thousands of times before but it didnt give enough of a benefit to survive long term and so the organisms went extinct. the only thing different now is that somebody found it by chance and took a closer look.
Um i think the difference is not only can it create its own sugars through chloroplasts but also now its own energy and its own amino acids. Its quite a big deal to produce alll your energy ambiently
Did you get food poisoned, or you became able to give other food poisoning? If it's the first option, you should have made 1 block vertical jump for the beef instead
idk bout you player but I'm not "goo- ing" on anything except inside of *insert a reproductive organ innuendo here* .. preferably one that's not too shallow? 🤔 lol 😅 (it's a loaded statement..)
Yes, they do. @@nostalji93 (I probably can't send links through the comment section so I will substitute some characters) Substitute the - with . And the spaces with a / Source: digital-csic-es bitstream 10261 354070 3 Massana_2024_postprint.pdf
Not exactly. The evidence mainly points to events like this only happening once in history (all organisms that have the endosymbiont all can be traced to a single common ancestor). The acquisition of chloroplasts did happen twice in history though! By two different lineages
@@HobbyDev-dh9oy you can look up the endosymbiotic theory. Mitochondria and chloroplast DNA are monophyletic (thought to radicate from a single ancestor population of cells)
@@WovenAlloy It's also not evolution im the sense that one species becomes another species, so I'm obviously just poking fun at a nom-sensical line, which a few people like to repeat way too much
@@Chronologist89Here is a scientific view point on how evolution has gaps in how it does not work or prove how everything started. In the scientific point if view the first thing about the evolution of life supposedly started 2,500,000,000 years ago in the ocean, the first life from "the cell" one sinlge cell you cant see, evolved and became alll the life on earth, the ostrich, elephant, Venus fly trap, crabs, bears, humans... Ect, trace back to the first cell 2.5 billion years ago. Now about the flaw i can point out that made me stop believing in evolution, so the first cell to exist, only life produces other life, something we all learn in biology class. It does not make since that a complicated dna stran fomed its self, that alone takes a miracle that life "appeared" these cells would start working together and evolve/fuse into fish and then became all the other animals. The problem with this is for animals, you need both male and female, single celled organisms tend to only be asexual or all if them are female and they self replicate. How would asexual beings involving 0 sexual relations, combine together and create a very complicated male reproductive system and a very very complicated female reproductive system? Asexual creatures would not both evole two complicated sets of body parts independenly from each other to make multiple cellular life possible. My point is, with how complicated the jump is from only cells to animals is such a huge massive change evolution its self can not prove or explain it. The only way i would believe it is if male and female was created with intelligent design for each other. Thats what technically happenes with God, it makes it reasonable to believe it to come, but random chance can not bring male and female
One thing i dont understand tho. I know the chances of this happening are low, but like since theres like a trillion microorganisms alive right now, surely it has happened more than 4 times? Just because youve only seen it once does not mean it didnt happen like 10 seconds ago
@@Shortking69-v4m Sir this is a TH-cam shorts comment section. Why would you expect to find anything other than 12 year olds and adults pretending to be 12 years old?
It’s because they make them in labs and introduce them into the world. How the hell do you explain them seeing this with a camera? Randomly picked an algae who doesn’t normally eat bacteria and wait till it does? And! Have a camera watching it the entire time? Who’s the camera man?
right? like i wonder how many thousands of times this happend in the ocean before, but it didnt lead nowhere. truely puts into perspective how special we are.
Thing is it take a while to realise that the change was ground breaking. Take the development of firearms for instance. The first "guns" where pretty useless tiny cannons on sticks. But since nerds at the time kept at it they eventually got something going and now the need for bows and crossbows on the modern battlefield is rather limited.
@@michaelpettersson4919 Yeah, as long as you're not facing Orcs, or Zombies, or Nazi-Israelis, and something, has happened and gunpowder/explosives won't work, and then little Johnny, who is just now reaching the bettlefield, having limped all the way, remembers the old shooting lodge and it's full of longbows and xbows.. actually, that is a bit specific, might actually be limited after all. Good point!
I just love it when new characters drop in game! I'm definitely excited to see what stats and buffs they have in their build; I was considering playing the cephlopoda class [specifically cuttlefish] in my next play-through but this one seems promising too
Sounds like that might happen in the next billion years, like considering the Earth might go through more temperature pressed atmospheres via CO2 due to the high density of plant life rising and the possibility of nitroplasts becoming more common over the upcoming time period. Nitrogen might also go a sort of chemical equilibrium due to these nitroplasts and any species that may or may not adapt this to their survival conditions.
I am studying Biological Sciences and my bachelor thesis was about that mechanism temporarily (kleptopasty) between two green algae and my master thesis is about origin/maintaining endosymbiosis in ciliates. So cool that you actually can observe evolution ❤
It's not new; nitrogen fixing bacteria in algae is very well known. What was discovered is that the relationship was tighter than previously understood (fully part of the organism as opposed to highly symbiotic).
Thanks, came to the comments to find out what exactly was the "discovery". The way he talks about it is like if the "organism acquisition" was observed in real time, which raised several red flags
@@xXJLNINJAXx The first life beings lived in a planet Earth with an atmosphere without much oxygen, in fact Oxygen was toxic for most life, so. When plants started doing photosynthesis and releasing tons of Oxygen to the atmosphere 95% of life died of Oxygen poisoning.
@@corbels evolution conflicts with creationism. So if you acknowledge science then it gets harder and harder to defend your religious beliefs over the field tested ones
@corbels research shows its devolution. If evolution were the case, all living things would be becoming superior to it's previous generations. Yet history proves that we can no longer mate with close relatives such as in the beginning of each animal species. Thus proof of dna devolving.
@@corbels he didn't argued with you ...... He was supporting your statement by giving the reason why they don't in science..... ( My first language isn't english so if there is any grammatical mistake then pardon me)
Same with me. I’m old, so I grew up before the internet existed, and I remember being certain that it would be one of the greatest achievements of humankind. Forgive me, I was a young college student who saw the bright side of everything. It was incredible - anyone could have access to the entirety of human knowledge on their personal computers connected to this vast internet. I envisioned people searching through museum archives for neglected fossils and seeds, reading documents in the Library of Congress, and teaching themselves cuneiform so they could read Sumerian clay tablets. Okay, so I was a dreamer. And what did people do when the earliest internet went live? Yeah, almost everyone went straight to porn…
"Nitroplast's debut album. I'm feeling a strong 7 to a light 8 on this one. What about you? Did you love it? Did you hate it? What would you rate it? You're the best. You're the best. Nitroplasts, forever."
Lynn Margulis sort of initiated this idea of symbio-Genesis in the 60s. She wrote several books in the 80s about Symbiogenesis. I think she woudl say there are many more than four times this has happened. I am very glad you are reporting on this! Maybe it has finally reached acceptance!
Actually among biologists plastid endosymbiosis has been accepted since the 1970s . Anyway two organisms becoming a third has been known since we understood lichens
Here is a scientific view point on how evolution has gaps in how it does not work or prove how everything started. In the scientific point if view the first thing about the evolution of life supposedly started 2,500,000,000 years ago in the ocean, the first life from "the cell" one sinlge cell you cant see, evolved and became alll the life on earth, the ostrich, elephant, Venus fly trap, crabs, bears, humans... Ect, trace back to the first cell 2.5 billion years ago. Now about the flaw i can point out that made me stop believing in evolution, so the first cell to exist, only life produces other life, something we all learn in biology class. It does not make since that a complicated dna stran fomed its self, that alone takes a miracle that life "appeared" these cells would start working together and evolve/fuse into fish and then became all the other animals. The problem with this is for animals, you need both male and female, single celled organisms tend to only be asexual or all if them are female and they self replicate. How would asexual beings involving 0 sexual relations, combine together and create a very complicated male reproductive system and a very very complicated female reproductive system? Asexual creatures would not both evole two complicated sets of body parts independenly from each other to make multiple cellular life possible. My point is, with how complicated the jump is from only cells to animals is such a huge massive change evolution its self can not prove or explain it. The only way i would believe it is if male and female was created with intelligent design for each other. Thats what technically happenes with God, it makes it reasonable to believe it to come, but random chance can not bring male and female
What is the other instance of this? The intro screen says it has happened 4 times. You only discuss 3 of them. What is the other instance of when this phenomenom occured?
For those who are wondering: A nitroplast is an organelle found in certain species of algae, particularly in the marine algae Braarudosphaera bigelowii. It plays a crucial role in nitrogen fixation, a process previously thought to be exclusive to bacteria and archaea.
the nitrogen bacteria has been completley swallowed and morphed into an organelle now the bacteria cant function without the host I'm pretty sure they're one now
Considering the chances that we were actually able to see this and capture it on camera; might indicate this happens more than we think we just have to look in the right places. Or Coevolution
Maybe overtime it could evolve further into one organism? Do you mean with endosymbionts that they are technically still 2 different organisms despite being merged together as one?
@@connorwright7040 yes. Mitochondrial DNA is still coded by the entire organism/cell's genome. It's not from outside the cell. Mitochondria are organelles and can't survive distinctly outside of the cell.
@@chiaka707 The idea is that the mitochondria originally *was* a seperate organism which is why it's different from the rest of the cell. It *did* originally come from outside the cell, just a really long time ago.
Pretty sure this happens all the time but has just been observed now. You don't just randomly find a "happened only 4 times in earths history" like that. I am sure it happened at least a few billion times but these 4 times it gave way to amazing changes.
We're busy looking for life in the Universe and Earth is like "I hear you guys like remakes"
Disney must have done this then
@@ToxiicAsAyyy ratio
Test
😂😂😂This is underrated
💀
Good to see the devs supporting the game and continually updating it
Yeah, I just hope I don’t get banned before the patch is out
@@Samos900 Your trial would have ended by then, we gotta wait for the full game 🙁
@@Samos900 Don't worry too much. There're infinite lives in this game.
How to make money in game?
@@noobian3314 I play for the quests.
Nitrogen breathing, ammonia exhaling lifeforms? and you thought humans were smelly, just wait
This is where those fleshy blob lifeforms start
We're seeing the birth of the Zerg
We wouldn’t have needed Fritz Haber if these guys had been well established by 110 years ago
That means nitrogen rich planets could have some type of life form.
@@AJ12GamerYou mean like... Earth?
@@DeathfireCaps yes and titan
He listed the first, second and fourth time this happened.
The third time this type of event happened was when certain types of protists, specifically eukaryotic cells, took in a red or green alga. This process, known as secondary endosymbiosis, allowed these protists to acquire photosynthetic capabilities by engulfing algae that already contained chloroplasts from a previous primary endosymbiosis event.
This third endosymbiotic event didn’t produce a whole new class of life but instead allowed certain protists, like Euglena and other algae, to perform photosynthesis and spread across various ecological niches.
This information deserves more likes
"... protists, specifically eukaryotic cells"
What? All protists are eukaryotes. Protists are just any eukaryotes apart from animals, land plants and fungi.
Thanks for filling in the GIGANTIC HOLE this guy left in the story, sure he only has so much time but at least mention it. And so we come to your comment, picking up the slack, recovering the fumble and running it in for a score. Well done sir well done, i was just hoping someone was nerdy enough to know and comment on this. My excuse is I went aerospace engineering, not exactly a ton of biology in there.
Finally, now I know the lore of new car yoda.
Basically amoebas that accidentally ate a chloroplast and kept it
We got an entirely new type of living organism before gta 6
😂
I love you man😂
Dead😂😂
Monster Minds!!
💀
babe wake up, new organism just dropped
I intentionally omitted the "ni"
😂😂
Underrated 😂
Science be like
new *organelle* just dropped lol
@@Arian-Mondal.1988except in your case there is no babe and it's just your right hand
This is gonna be such a sick class to play as in a billion years
The zerg
If somehow earth survives solar death that is
Dawg the sun is gonna exposed in 5 billion years so probably not
@@VarhiemalBethorbrother 1 < 5
That is if we don't learn how to use the suns energy
_"We just witnessed one of the rarest event in earth's history!"_
*So you heard about my teenage daughter doing the dishes too!?*
😂😂😂😂
😂😂😂😂😂😂 that's hilarious
Best laugh of the day!
If that ever happens you know you have a totally new lifeform in your house
Wha
Great… now we have to learn that nitroplasts are the powerhouse of the algae
Haha don't worry they still have tubular cristae which produce ATP like a Mitochondria- doesn't roll off the tongue quite the same though.
😂
Plants fart too!
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Nice PFP
Another billion years? I'll set my alarm.
The last time this happened, actually each time it did, it caused a massive worldwide die off every time in a short period of time with survivors and new forms of life advancing in the new biom over millions of years.
I’d probably still sleep in.
What about the Sun's "lifespan"
@@polonyuino5016Yeah, its supposedly gonna be hot enough to boil our oceans in a billion years lol, though were either already dead or on another planet by then and will most likely bring life with us and this one in particular could be quite useful
lmfaoooo
Siri, set calendar for one billion years, title: Nitroplasts.
😅😅😅
Setting calendar alarm for one billion years, title: Nitroplasts
Would you like me to alert you one day before the event?
It’s gunna be like a whole Fortnite live event
@@an18yearoldmongolianguyI seen your pfp, along with your comment, and it gave me a brilliant idea. Siri, with the voice of Skeletor.
@@JoshuaMusasulenew form of life on our planet = fortnite concert
As a microbiologist, this is one of the coolest discoveries of my life, what an amazing time to be alive
You know you fcked up when the bacteria is already making a plan B
Real
I was thinking the same thing 😔
Isnt the algae the one with a back up plan? If it was "swallowed" not so sure it was willing lmao
This implies the bacteria evolving to eat certain plastics were Plan A
@@DarethianI mean, in return for getting swallowed, and becoming a vital organ to help the algae. They also get housing and protection.
Endosymbiosis - one among many examples that show cooperation, rather than competition, as a key to survival.
Cooperation is vastly more common in nature than competition. That's how multicellularity works, after all. We've just largely failed to acknowledge that because the guy who discovered evolution was a wealthy white male Victorian British citizen - exactly the kind of person who would only see violence in nature because his mere existence required so much of it. The ideology of empire, permanently imprinted upon an entire field of science.
@@Frommerman You're a freak.
@@Frommerman well you're not wrong. But there are issues of renormalization and coarse-graining involved in your argument that would certainly affect the discussion of cooperation and competition.
@@Frommerman👏👏👏👏👏👏💙💙💙
Lynn Margulis!
"Oh sh*t, I forgot to upgrade earth! Let me just do something from earlier seasons for nostalgia bait..."
Fortnite
it’s not nostalgia bait, fans have been asking for an algae update for awhile and the devs are finally listening.
@@acisverycoolhopefully they bring the cut content "dinosaurs" and actually add it to the game instead of letting it sit in the files . Atp I'm begging for a new biome or new animal
@@acisverycoolfr
100 million years agemi? Isn't "new".. New to discovery? Yes. More fun facts. 😂😂
you simultaneously look like both Chris Martin and Dantdm at the same time.
Ain't no way Life 3.1 dropped before GTA 6
Is GTA6 the new Half Life 3?
Nah this is just the release trailer, the update comes out next billion year. GTA 6 comes out in the next trillion year.
@@alexs5814no because GTA6 will actually release
@@rudrasingh6354 More lies spread by rockstar
Copied comments are sad 😔
Wake up guys new domain just dropped
6 likes and no comments? Let me fix that
Nearly 150 likes and just a single comment. Let me fix that.
266 likes and only two comments? Let me fix that.
I dont think its a new domain as the papers classify the algae as a eukaryote still, maybe a new Kingdom?
Then again biologists at that level tend not to use the Linnaean classification system anymore or even the 3 Domain System and instead use cladistics.
It's not getting likes because masses don't understand
Glad they are keeping the game updated but they really gotta fix the balancing I’ve been stuck in poverty rank for 21 years
Post your build
@@Joutube_is_trash i’m currently using the goodwill armor set and the legendary weapon “stale fry’s garlic bread”
post your skill tree setup
How do I exit lobby? I’ve been stuck on the same screen for 25 years
@@jeffreykoepke1922 grim
Dude this is amazing, thank you for sharing
It’s pretty funny that the algae is now a eukaryote powered by a prokaryote, fueled by another prokaryote making energy through the byproduct of ANOTHER projaryote. Karyote …ception?
Lol this comment was something else😂
Here is a scientific view point on how evolution has gaps in how it does not work or prove how everything started.
In the scientific point if view the first thing about the evolution of life supposedly started 2,500,000,000 years ago in the ocean, the first life from "the cell" one sinlge cell you cant see, evolved and became alll the life on earth, the ostrich, elephant, Venus fly trap, crabs, bears, humans... Ect, trace back to the first cell 2.5 billion years ago.
Now about the flaw i can point out that made me stop believing in evolution, so the first cell to exist, only life produces other life, something we all learn in biology class. It does not make since that a complicated dna stran fomed its self, that alone takes a miracle that life "appeared" these cells would start working together and evolve/fuse into fish and then became all the other animals.
The problem with this is for animals, you need both male and female, single celled organisms tend to only be asexual or all if them are female and they self replicate. How would asexual beings involving 0 sexual relations, combine together and create a very complicated male reproductive system and a very very complicated female reproductive system? Asexual creatures would not both evole two complicated sets of body parts independenly from each other to make multiple cellular life possible.
My point is, with how complicated the jump is from only cells to animals is such a huge massive change evolution its self can not prove or explain it. The only way i would believe it is if male and female was created with intelligent design for each other. Thats what technically happenes with God, it makes it reasonable to believe it to come, but random chance can not bring male and female
i used all the neurodes to read this
apparently
Him card read good
Just a clarification. The mitochondria wasn't introduced into just animals. It was introduced into eukaryotes. Plants and fungi have mitochondria too!
Actually humans are the only species known to have mithochondria. None of the other animals OR planta have it.
*weren't
It wasn't *introduced* into eukaryotes. It was introduced into archaea with the result of the merging being eukaryotes.
@@Hanstein. no he's right, it is wasn't. Mitochondria is used as a single noun in place of a broader noun, so it is wasn't instead of weren't.
I was about to rip my hair out at that comment.
Extremely interesting phenomenon. It’s called the Endosymbiosis Theory. The mitochondria has separate genetic information from the nucleus
Ah yes, aka the powerhouse of the cell
Is it an actual distinct “organelle”, OR is it really a symbiotic life form within all eukaryotic cells?
@@eldermillennial8330Well all somatic cells contain copies of the body's DNA. The mitochondria possess its own set of DNA. Suggesting that it is/was its own organism.
If it was an organelle the DNA for the mitochondria would just be with all the other DNA for the body
@@F-sj7cuYou beat me to that one.
@@eldermillennial8330 It's both. When you ask "what part of the cell is this?" you get "it's an organelle which means a little organ. When you ask "why is it the way it is?" you get to the endosymbiotic theory. But it's not an organism in itself anymore after it became a part of a bigger thing.
This is so cool. No witty comment, it's just... Really cool to see this happen.
I guess it was kind of inevitable. 70% of earths atmosphere is Nitrogen. It does open a fair few interesting metabolic pathways for life to take advantage of.
There are dozens of nitrogen based metabolisms, but they require you usually to expend most of your evolution points towards it cause you pretty complex cellular enzymes and compartments, and they also are generally low energy output. But with organelle evolution, like the chloroplast, we might see some interesting development
@@ssm-sf8by thank you tier zoo
@@ssm-sf8byYup. Many land plants, for example, have nitrogen-fixing bacteria among their roots.
If they had nitroplasts, they could cut them out of the middle and become potentially VASTLY more effective and grow ridiculously! Water and nitrates are their biggest bottlenecks! They get carbon and oxygen from the air, water from the ground, and energy from light!
The marine algae in question is **Rhopalodia gibba,** a type of diatom. Rhopalodia gibba is known for hosting endosymbiotic cyanobacteria, which can fix atmospheric nitrogen into ammonia, thus providing the diatom with an essential nutrient.
Scientists have been critical of this "discovery" for several reasons:
1. **Misinterpretation of Symbiosis**: Some early reports suggested that Rhopalodia gibba "swallowed" bacteria, implying a more permanent and integrative process akin to the origin of mitochondria and chloroplasts. Critics argue that this mischaracterizes the relationship, which is more accurately described as an endosymbiosis, where the cyanobacteria live inside the diatom but remain distinct entities.
2. **Complexity of Symbiotic Relationships**: The symbiotic relationship between Rhopalodia gibba and the cyanobacteria is complex and highly specialized. Critics point out that simplifying this relationship to a mere "swallowing" overlooks the physiological adaptations required for such a symbiosis to function effectively.
3. **Genetic and Functional Integration**: The notion of one organism swallowing another and integrating it into its cellular machinery as a permanent feature involves significant genetic and functional integration. Critics emphasize that in the case of Rhopalodia gibba, the cyanobacteria maintain their own genetic identity and are not fully integrated into the host diatom’s cellular processes in the same way as organelles like mitochondria.
4. **Evidence and Documentation**: Some skepticism arises from the evidence and documentation provided in studies claiming such symbiotic events. Critics demand rigorous, reproducible evidence to support claims of such significant evolutionary events, and they caution against drawing premature conclusions from preliminary findings.
In summary, while the endosymbiotic relationship in Rhopalodia gibba is fascinating and significant, scientists emphasize the importance of accurately describing the nature of this relationship and caution against over-simplifying or misinterpreting the biological processes involved.
I wonder if that's possible. N2 is extremely stable (it's why nitrogen is used to provide an inert atmosphere for many chemical reactions), so if it was going to metabolize actual N2 I think it would have to be with pure lithium metal, which I think would be extremely unlikely for an organism to possess as part of its body. Maybe there's some other way it could be done, like with electricity.
As a microbiologist, this is the coolest news of my life!!
Hello! This is awesome news. You seem like someone interested in cool biology. I'm reading symbiotic planet by Lynn margulis and it makes the argument that endosymbiosis happens all the time (that it's actually largely how evolution proceeds). Just thought you might find that cool! (And it's a great book!)
not a microbiologist.... the is very cool annd kind of scary. imagine this new algae replaced the current algae in plants the world over because those new plants vastly out competed our current plants. this would mean unused ammonia would be dissolved into plants in higher concentrations? would that be a problem for consumption?
Should it be concerning that it's releasing ammonia? Will it eventually change the makeup of our water and aquatic life?
@@Kryso_0 ammonia will never be in excess unless its in food...what i mean is ammonia is a great way to ship hydrogen fuel because (and i know it sounds unintuitive) liquid ammonia can store more hydrogen in the same size tank as just pure hydrogen and much safer to transport
That's sad
Hello everyone
Here are the update logs for the update 1.37
-added new lifeforms
-added new zone in the map
-patched gamebreaking glitch (the one that let monkeys clip through walls)
-buffed human knowledge by 1%
-nerfed corona virus (death chance 1% --> 0.2%)
-added new disease (secret so no spoilers)
Next update will be a big update our devs are actively working on it but because of all the other planets we are working on the update might get delayed by a few decades.
Underrated 😭
😆😆
Come on dude it’s been centuries. Just introduce us to the damn extraterrestrials
new disease??😱
only buffed 1%?
If any nitroblasts reading this: we wanna say wassup
New ability unlocked:
Nitrogen breathing
Out ammonia.
I breathe nitrogen everyday. Love it
air is mostly nitrogen
Nitrogen breathing third form Ammonia.
YEAH!... Breath in Nitrogen, breathe out 2Nitrogen oxide wouldn't we all be "laughing"?.....🤔 OR Nitrogen dioxide and we would suffocate!....😕
*humans seemingly trying to destroy the biosphere
Bacteria: _"hold my beer"_
"Life, uh, finds a way."
Well we are not destroying the biosphere, we're just destroying the state of the biosphere which is suitable for us to thrive
theyve done it before they can do it again
Their getting ready for the new atmosphere update.
“This has happened FOUR times!”
Mf you only told me 3, now I wanna know the last one!
I think its fungi, but idk
He said it happened 4 times _before_ but only mentioned the mitochondria and chloroplasts
The four known primary endosymbiosis events are mitochondria in eukaryotes, chloroplasts in archaeplastids (plants, "green algae", "red algae", etc), and then two separate instances involving nitroplasts.
One happened in certain diatoms, the other is in this video. These guys aren't super closely related to each other or plants, but they are part of a much bigger group containing archaeplastids, though on the "opposite" side. Diatoms are very closely related to "brown algae" (like kelp) and the one in this video, a haptophyte, is a pretty distant relative, but still closer to diatoms than to plants.
Basically "algae" is a very general term for a huge group of plant-like eukaryotes, both microscopic and visible, and they did lots of endosymbiosis. There are other endosymbiosis events, but they were not primary. So they might involve trapping a cell that has trapped another cell, or even going another layer deep
@@HuckleberryHimyou are what makes the internet a better place. Thank you for sharing :)
thx
Dude your voice and smile added a few decades to my live
It’s just a reclassification.
This is from the 2024 nature article: “But in the latest study, Zehr and his colleagues conclude that UCYN-A (the bacteria) should be classed as organelles inside the algae, rather than as a separate organism. According to genetic analysis from a previous study, ancestors of the algae and bacteria entered a symbiotic relationship around 100 million years ago, says Zehr. Eventually, this gave rise to the nitroplast organelle, now seen in B. bigelowii.”
He’s making it sound like scientists just witnessed this event.
Exactly! Furthermore, their article in Cell underlines that the symbiosis is unstable in certain conditions & that the gene transfer from one organism to another hasn’t been proven yet!
Thank you for an intelligent comment with a source! But yea I have to say it made me a tad sceptical on how it was phrased as having just seen it happening. Also just given the fact that something like this is so beneficial that i would have to imagine it isn't the first time but maybe the first evidence. Alot of times algae or microorganisms don't leave the best fossil records but given the fact that from that first event happening till now we've had a soup of algae and bacteria mixing around in the environment that takes up roughly 70% of the planet i think the odds are slim that this might not have happened before at some point. Fixing nitrogen is just too advantageous.
Wow another short that's bullshit...I'm shocked
@@funtourhawk the video presented it as if we were witnessing an endosymbiosis event (a cell engulfing a cell to become one organism) but in reality it’s simply a common occurrence in biology where two organism coexist and work together to gain mutual benefits! Just *a* symbiosis!
@@valaamis Keyword, "yet". It's kind of assumed to be a given, but because the scientific process is what it is, it cannot be supported until it is directly witnessed. Just because it's a declaration and not a discovery doesn't make it any less exciting. The same thing goes for declaring the extinction of a species. It typically happens decades, even a century after the last sighting, but that doesn't make it any less tragic.
Furthermore, independent research by Francisco M. Cornejo-Castillo, et al from the highly esteemed science journal "Cell", has shown that the previous symbiosis between algae and prokaryotic bacteria had constrained the size of the host organism, as the bacteria could only fix so much nitrogen to fuel the cell. But as an organelle, that limitation no longer exists. Much like the rise of complex plant and animal life, this opens up the potential for complex, self-sustaining life in the distant future.
The video implies that this absorption just happened, which is not the case. But the existence of the organelle was only recently discovered.
That's kind of how every discovery works. It happens, then we notice some time down the road
@@elandthirkhaoth4718i think this particular one occurred like 80 million years ago. Edit: 100 million years ago
ahhhhhh
@@Alex-dh2cx Which in evolutionary terms is like yesterday.
@@nemo-x but in human terms it was not like yesterday. Just supporting op who brought up the video is misrepresenting the timescale
this has happened hundreds probably thousands of times before but it didnt give enough of a benefit to survive long term and so the organisms went extinct.
the only thing different now is that somebody found it by chance and took a closer look.
Multicellular life happened in this way.. I’d bet this has happened more than hundreds or thousands of times.
Um i think the difference is not only can it create its own sugars through chloroplasts but also now its own energy and its own amino acids. Its quite a big deal to produce alll your energy ambiently
@@kayboy6055finally, protein trees.
@@kayboy6055what happened in this case is that a bacteria became an organelle or endosymbiosis. It has happened 4 times.
are u saying all the scientist that evaluated this are wrong?
"better late than never" ahhh organism
Ahh comments are not funny
@igur
Didn’t know Anthony Fantano cared this much about the Earth.
underrated comment, lmao
oh nah 😭
bbnofantano
OMG HAHA
Hes vegan so
I consumed raw chicken and got the rare ability of food poisoning
*debuff
Underrated Comment 😂
(Edit): this made my day
Did the raw chicken become a new organ inside you
Did you get food poisoned, or you became able to give other food poisoning?
If it's the first option, you should have made 1 block vertical jump for the beef instead
Is this a Minecraft thing?
New cell organelle dropped? Let's freaking goo!!!
So we've ultimately observed something that happens on a daily basis everywhere at all times.
nah sounds just like an endosymbiotic event. Nothing special about that. The question is do they reproduce together?
idk bout you player but I'm not "goo- ing" on anything except inside of *insert a reproductive organ innuendo here* .. preferably one that's not too shallow? 🤔 lol 😅 (it's a loaded statement..)
Yes, they do. @@nostalji93
(I probably can't send links through the comment section so I will substitute some characters)
Substitute the - with . And the spaces with a /
Source:
digital-csic-es bitstream 10261 354070 3 Massana_2024_postprint.pdf
@nostalji75 they don't. the video is misleading
Fascinating! Thanks for these news :D
We're getting cat girls in 1 billion years
More like all air is now fart.
@@Handlerhandlerhandwhen you think it’s a fart but you just sh*t your pants
Yessir
@@Handlerhandlerhanddelicious
@@linstevin2592with clouds comes thunder
The Mitochondria lore just continues to expand
Bacteria: hey do you want to form a symbiotic relationship with me?
Organism: hmm sure, but I am pretty hungry right now-
So they went to a molecular McDonald's date and he came inside of her.
Do you have a link to the article and scientific index that proves this actual research and study 🙏🙏🙏
Just because it's the first time this has been observed doesn't mean this exact same thing hasn't been recurring.
Not exactly. The evidence mainly points to events like this only happening once in history (all organisms that have the endosymbiont all can be traced to a single common ancestor). The acquisition of chloroplasts did happen twice in history though! By two different lineages
@@JuancharroVlogsthe giant sea scallop, it has bacteria that does photosynthesis and feeds it
@@RoseBushThorns588 But those bacteria are still separate organisms. They're not part of the scallop's cells.
@@JuancharroVlogsWhat evidence exactly?
@@HobbyDev-dh9oy you can look up the endosymbiotic theory. Mitochondria and chloroplast DNA are monophyletic (thought to radicate from a single ancestor population of cells)
"Hey Siri, set a reminder for 1 billion years"
"sHow mE eVolUtiOn haPPeNinG in A laB", well there ya go, darling.
It wasnt in a lab
@@WovenAlloy It's also not evolution im the sense that one species becomes another species, so I'm obviously just poking fun at a nom-sensical line, which a few people like to repeat way too much
@@Chronologist89Here is a scientific view point on how evolution has gaps in how it does not work or prove how everything started.
In the scientific point if view the first thing about the evolution of life supposedly started 2,500,000,000 years ago in the ocean, the first life from "the cell" one sinlge cell you cant see, evolved and became alll the life on earth, the ostrich, elephant, Venus fly trap, crabs, bears, humans... Ect, trace back to the first cell 2.5 billion years ago.
Now about the flaw i can point out that made me stop believing in evolution, so the first cell to exist, only life produces other life, something we all learn in biology class. It does not make since that a complicated dna stran fomed its self, that alone takes a miracle that life "appeared" these cells would start working together and evolve/fuse into fish and then became all the other animals.
The problem with this is for animals, you need both male and female, single celled organisms tend to only be asexual or all if them are female and they self replicate. How would asexual beings involving 0 sexual relations, combine together and create a very complicated male reproductive system and a very very complicated female reproductive system? Asexual creatures would not both evole two complicated sets of body parts independenly from each other to make multiple cellular life possible.
My point is, with how complicated the jump is from only cells to animals is such a huge massive change evolution its self can not prove or explain it. The only way i would believe it is if male and female was created with intelligent design for each other. Thats what technically happenes with God, it makes it reasonable to believe it to come, but random chance can not bring male and female
@@WovenAlloyyes it was
@@WovenAlloy the whole earth is a biological laboratory
One thing i dont understand tho. I know the chances of this happening are low, but like since theres like a trillion microorganisms alive right now, surely it has happened more than 4 times? Just because youve only seen it once does not mean it didnt happen like 10 seconds ago
Bro is the internet's busiest biology nerd 💀
This the comment I was looking for
Immature, I'm talking about you pokefreak2112
@@Shortking69-v4m Sir this is a TH-cam shorts comment section. Why would you expect to find anything other than 12 year olds and adults pretending to be 12 years old?
Thanks Logic for teaching me about biology
it's incomprehensible just how groundbreaking stuff is always happening around us, we just haven't witnessed it yet
It’s because they make them in labs and introduce them into the world. How the hell do you explain them seeing this with a camera? Randomly picked an algae who doesn’t normally eat bacteria and wait till it does? And! Have a camera watching it the entire time? Who’s the camera man?
right? like i wonder how many thousands of times this happend in the ocean before, but it didnt lead nowhere. truely puts into perspective how special we are.
Thing is it take a while to realise that the change was ground breaking. Take the development of firearms for instance. The first "guns" where pretty useless tiny cannons on sticks. But since nerds at the time kept at it they eventually got something going and now the need for bows and crossbows on the modern battlefield is rather limited.
Yeah. Makes me mad. So mad, I could just..well..break some thing- ground, break some ground.
@@michaelpettersson4919 Yeah, as long as you're not facing Orcs, or Zombies, or Nazi-Israelis, and something, has happened and gunpowder/explosives won't work, and then little Johnny, who is just now reaching the bettlefield, having limped all the way, remembers the old shooting lodge and it's full of longbows and xbows.. actually, that is a bit specific, might actually be limited after
all. Good point!
I just love it when new characters drop in game! I'm definitely excited to see what stats and buffs they have in their build; I was considering playing the cephlopoda class [specifically cuttlefish] in my next play-through but this one seems promising too
My favourite part was when he said “it’s nitroplasting time!” And proceeded to nitroplast all over the place.
Sounds like that might happen in the next billion years, like considering the Earth might go through more temperature pressed atmospheres via CO2 due to the high density of plant life rising and the possibility of nitroplasts becoming more common over the upcoming time period. Nitrogen might also go a sort of chemical equilibrium due to these nitroplasts and any species that may or may not adapt this to their survival conditions.
@@creeperkinght1144holeh moleh
@@creeperkinght1144I ain’t reading allat
@@Itz.Emmyzz It's only a small paragraph......😅
My favorite part was when onionrain said " it's unoriginality time" and proceeded to unoriginal all over the place
I was expecting you to say "England made it to a Major Tournament Final"
😂
Not only animals, all eukaryotes have mitochondria
Came here to comment this myself, thank you for beating me to it
So annoying, we all know what he meant
@@wolfy2921 yeah maybe on a non science video, but as a science communicator he should be clearer. Precision and accuracy matter.
I am studying Biological Sciences and my bachelor thesis was about that mechanism temporarily (kleptopasty) between two green algae and my master thesis is about origin/maintaining endosymbiosis in ciliates. So cool that you actually can observe evolution ❤
I’m confused by this comment section and that it’s not filled with “the Mitochondria is the powerhouse of the cell”
It's like they don't have the slightest realization.
Probably because people have forgotten the meme or that teacher have stopped using that phrase in their classes
We are the first of the forgotten my guy 😂 30+ in the houusse
Couldn't have said it better myself mate lmao ^
It said it in the video so that kind of removed the impetus for us all to say it.
That one gear ratio will finally make one rotation by the time the plot gets interesting
fax
New organelle just dropped 🔥 🗣️
"Alexa, set reminder for a billion years..."
It's not new; nitrogen fixing bacteria in algae is very well known. What was discovered is that the relationship was tighter than previously understood (fully part of the organism as opposed to highly symbiotic).
Hi, John,
Thank you for your clarification.
Be Well.
Shhhh let them believe their nonsense. They don't deserve the truth 😂😂😂
Thanks, came to the comments to find out what exactly was the "discovery". The way he talks about it is like if the "organism acquisition" was observed in real time, which raised several red flags
didn't he specifically mention this?
@@peterbulley9391 you should give it another watch... but meh who cares
Second time this happened 95% of life died. Stop them NOW
?
@@xXJLNINJAXx The first life beings lived in a planet Earth with an atmosphere without much oxygen, in fact Oxygen was toxic for most life, so. When plants started doing photosynthesis and releasing tons of Oxygen to the atmosphere 95% of life died of Oxygen poisoning.
Hehe
@@memetheew It did not die from Oxygen poisoning but from the temperature drop that happened after almost all of CO2 got sucked up.
I hope you guys like breathing Ammonia.
- "I don't believe in evolution"
- Mosquitoes, roaches, dogs, cats, corn, and that one nitroplast literally mutating right now: are we a joke to you?
As a Christian, I can tell you that evolution does exist idk why some people just don’t believe in science at all
@@corbels evolution conflicts with creationism. So if you acknowledge science then it gets harder and harder to defend your religious beliefs over the field tested ones
@@brenon1441 why do you feel the need to argue with me lol?
@corbels
research shows its devolution. If evolution were the case, all living things would be becoming superior to it's previous generations. Yet history proves that we can no longer mate with close relatives such as in the beginning of each animal species. Thus proof of dna devolving.
@@corbels he didn't argued with you ...... He was supporting your statement by giving the reason why they don't in science.....
( My first language isn't english so if there is any grammatical mistake then pardon me)
Thank you for sharing, Logic
This, this is the kind of content that keeps me coming back to TH-cam.
This BS is what causes people to be so f-ing stupid or to be PC misinformed.
Same with me. I’m old, so I grew up before the internet existed, and I remember being certain that it would be one of the greatest achievements of humankind. Forgive me, I was a young college student who saw the bright side of everything.
It was incredible - anyone could have access to the entirety of human knowledge on their personal computers connected to this vast internet. I envisioned people searching through museum archives for neglected fossils and seeds, reading documents in the Library of Congress, and teaching themselves cuneiform so they could read Sumerian clay tablets. Okay, so I was a dreamer. And what did people do when the earliest internet went live? Yeah, almost everyone went straight to porn…
@@pinkmonkeybird2644 to be fair i consider myself a scholar of the ancient porn of yesteryear. does that count as a compromise?
@@pinkmonkeybird2644 No one cares
newgen
British scientists Anthony Fantano isnt real, he can't hurt you
British Scientist Anthony Fantano:
Fantano. Hard to spell?
@@jayson9999ful nah I always thought it was Fantino not Fantano, 4/10 name.
@@jayson9999ful "Hard to spell" says Jayson with a Y
@@sirpsychosussydawg why you do em like that
@@jayson9999ful I dunno I read it Fentanyl 💀
Therapist: British Anthony Fantano isn’t real he won’t hurt you
British Anthony Fantano
I can’t believe I how far I had to scroll just to see someone say he looks like Fantano!
What is up with british people ? Are you Hatsune Miku ?
Brother got the mitochondria treatment
Pov: the humans finally noticed you and it's starting to look grim
Reminds me of that Onion headline:
Dolphins evolve opposable thumbs, "Oh shit!" Says humanity.
"Nitroplast's debut album. I'm feeling a strong 7 to a light 8 on this one. What about you? Did you love it? Did you hate it? What would you rate it? You're the best. You're the best. Nitroplasts, forever."
can u link the studies pls?
Lynn Margulis sort of initiated this idea of symbio-Genesis in the 60s. She wrote several books in the 80s about Symbiogenesis. I think she woudl say there are many more than four times this has happened. I am very glad you are reporting on this! Maybe it has finally reached acceptance!
Actually among biologists plastid endosymbiosis has been accepted since the 1970s . Anyway two organisms becoming a third has been known since we understood lichens
Here is a scientific view point on how evolution has gaps in how it does not work or prove how everything started.
In the scientific point if view the first thing about the evolution of life supposedly started 2,500,000,000 years ago in the ocean, the first life from "the cell" one sinlge cell you cant see, evolved and became alll the life on earth, the ostrich, elephant, Venus fly trap, crabs, bears, humans... Ect, trace back to the first cell 2.5 billion years ago.
Now about the flaw i can point out that made me stop believing in evolution, so the first cell to exist, only life produces other life, something we all learn in biology class. It does not make since that a complicated dna stran fomed its self, that alone takes a miracle that life "appeared" these cells would start working together and evolve/fuse into fish and then became all the other animals.
The problem with this is for animals, you need both male and female, single celled organisms tend to only be asexual or all if them are female and they self replicate. How would asexual beings involving 0 sexual relations, combine together and create a very complicated male reproductive system and a very very complicated female reproductive system? Asexual creatures would not both evole two complicated sets of body parts independenly from each other to make multiple cellular life possible.
My point is, with how complicated the jump is from only cells to animals is such a huge massive change evolution its self can not prove or explain it. The only way i would believe it is if male and female was created with intelligent design for each other. Thats what technically happenes with God, it makes it reasonable to believe it to come, but random chance can not bring male and female
Oh wow, glad to see a channel actually talking about this
I'll remember this in a billion years when it finally becomes relevant.
Probably already 'relevant', considering that _all_ complex life likely _began_ with the merging of two 'mutually advantageous' cells.
Didn’t understand most of this, but how happy he is talking about this stuff made me watch to the end 🥰
Any scientists wanna witness me eating probiotic yoghourt?
Not really
@@relaxedmuffin3666Somehow, I really doubt you're a scientist in any real meaning of the word.
@@svmwasthesheet1971 🤔 Depends how you define it. Not currently doing research, but have done in the past.
@@relaxedmuffin3666watching midget porn isn't research
What is the other instance of this? The intro screen says it has happened 4 times. You only discuss 3 of them. What is the other instance of when this phenomenom occured?
For those who are wondering:
A nitroplast is an organelle found in certain species of algae, particularly in the marine algae Braarudosphaera bigelowii. It plays a crucial role in nitrogen fixation, a process previously thought to be exclusive to bacteria and archaea.
Here i was, thinking i am a fluid English speaker till you pulled Braarudosphaera, bigelowii and archaea out.
@@Big_Dolfie You certainly seem like a wet English speaker :D
@@Big_Dolfie Swallow before you speak, please 😂
Braarudosphaera bigelowii, male gigolowii
Braarudosphaera bigelowii, male gigilowii
how do we know this isnt just an advanced symbiotic relationship between microorganisms, and not the start of a new species 💀
Idk man, maybe read up on it and look into what experts who have studied this stuff their whole lives have to say before taking a stab in the dark.
@@daxramdac7194 so many bots oml
the nitrogen bacteria has been completley swallowed and morphed into an organelle now the bacteria cant function without the host I'm pretty sure they're one now
Considering the chances that we were actually able to see this and capture it on camera; might indicate this happens more than we think we just have to look in the right places.
Or Coevolution
His eye contact is scaring me hdhsdhdhd
New category of life dropped before GTA 6😭
*Half-Life 3
@@ghost_ship_supreme
Quarter-Life
@@poka26ev2 Whole-life
👏🏻g👏🏻t👏🏻 a👏🏻6👏🏻don’t👏🏻matter‼️
swordigo 2
Babe wake up, new animal just dropped
Algae aren’t animals, they’re single celled organisms. Animals are multicellular by definition
I Could Listen To This Guy All Day Long. It's Like Being Hypnotised By A Really Clever Person. I Would Believe Anything He Told Me.
Damn Fantano that's pretty cool
Bro I was looking for this
This guy's straight up the internets busiest science nerd
I swear I thought it was him
Happy for God updating Earth
Updating the earth is a funny idea
Dump answer.
god isn't real.
makes me feel like a group project
Thank you for the info!!!
"Mitochondria is the powerhouse of the cell"
This is literally Earth organic life 4.0 (early access)
Crazy bro been around since 1000 years/updates ago. Thanks for sticking around to let us know! How else would we get this 1 bill old info.
Sounds like something my science teacher would tell me on a random thursday
We really got a new type of living organism before the Switch 2 huh
"planthony bactano here the internets busiest botanist"
Underrated comment 💀
@@thehoodlen lol
I really wish my strawberries with their yellow leaves were taking notes 😂
Brilliant observation! There should be a scientific study entitled "Beyond Symbiosis - The Creation of a New Life Form Introducing The NITROPLAST"
Who thinks background music should be little lower in volume.
It's not that loud
Much different than chloroplasts or mitochondria. These nitroplasts are strictly endosymbionts and do not share generic material
Maybe overtime it could evolve further into one organism? Do you mean with endosymbionts that they are technically still 2 different organisms despite being merged together as one?
Mitochondria also have their own DNA, seperate from the rest of the cell. In that way, nitroplasts are actually very similar.
@@connorwright7040 yes. Mitochondrial DNA is still coded by the entire organism/cell's genome. It's not from outside the cell. Mitochondria are organelles and can't survive distinctly outside of the cell.
@@UltraBeatZ yes. They are distinct organisms
@@chiaka707 The idea is that the mitochondria originally *was* a seperate organism which is why it's different from the rest of the cell. It *did* originally come from outside the cell, just a really long time ago.
Pretty sure this happens all the time but has just been observed now.
You don't just randomly find a "happened only 4 times in earths history" like that.
I am sure it happened at least a few billion times but these 4 times it gave way to amazing changes.
bro looks so happy and im here for it