Great episode! Whenever there's discussion on high-speed flight, the titanium skin of the SR-71 is always mentioned. There is another material that is seldom mentioned, but equally important-the nickel-chromium-iron alloy Inconel that was used on the X-15.
Correct. Inconel may not have as cool a name as titanium but it is also very important at high temperatures. Some others are Nimonic, Waspalloy and Hastelloy. Worth checking out
This was a brilliant episode. I really appreciate that the Event Horizon team can reach out to such a wide range of people and get them on the show. I could tell that John was enjoying this interview and the engineers bounced off each other so well.
Irony, these guys spend most of their waking lives trying to study and implement my own physics for hypersonics, plasma dynamics, etc. Drew, IO Aircraft formerly phantom works
Mach 12 is approx 9132 miles per hour ? 1975 ? HEAVY G ITS NOT CALLED A WIND SHIELD ? ITS A WIND SCREEN. ? THE X 15 HAS BEEN SITTING IN A MUSEUM FOR MANY YEARS. ? BUT I DO BELIEVE THAT THIS GUY DOES HAVE A B.S DEGREE ???? YABBA DABBA DOO 😮😮😮
Imagine if we compensated raw science the way we compensate defense spending--These guys could just work on going fast without directly supporting economy-draining activities like wars, and the gross waste and corruption in the defense industry.
Three special guests your spoiling us John Michael Godier. Event horizons is my go to show for current thinking and best guests on TH-cam your number 1 in my mind keeping it real in this universe in which we liiiiiiive 😊❤
John I appreciate the fact that you can discuss SR71 technology in our own atmosphere with the same curiosity and enthusiasm that you do with Von Newmann probes and Dyson Spheres. Thank you!!
Excellent interview! I’d still like hear in discrete words if some of our Lockheed professionals have gained the ability to replicate or reproduce alien vehicles, or otherwise build non-aerodynamic vehicles capable of buoyancy in a gravitational field. Thanks!
I doubt even these incredible engineers are read into those black budget programs. Probably no longer any military contractor industry knows but only a tiny percentage. 😊
Cool stuff. If you get a round two can you ask about the HF electrical systems for the plane's surface to help with hypersonics? I know the one guy mentioned EE's as part of the equation but now that the tech is public knowledge it seems at least as interesting as the materials science aspect.
I understand so unfortunately little about the physics of flight! This interview's so interesting! As a meta side note, I now understand why the folks who are so excited when listening to your interviews about cosmology. I liked above all else the question about flying on Mars. It's very interesting whether non-rocket-assisted high-speed flight could be be possible there at all-not the Ingenuity scale, but lifting at the least one human and one backpack. :) The answer was… very scientific: it depends on factors we don't yet know. At the very least, we're reasonably sure there are no birds on Mars! I'm scientific to the bone when I'm sciencing, but on this point I'd give the humanity a handicap of a couple centuries and then some-we're not yet offering the vacationers a flyby of Mount Olympus. :)
How could you possibly past on the opportunity to NOT as about the physics and flight characteristics of UAPs? If for no other reason then to see how they reach to the question. That would have been the icing on the cake. I would like to hear their speculation on how a craft can dissipate the heat generated when moving from 80,000ft to sea level in less than 2 sec.? As them to calculate how many joules are needed to move from sea level flight to 80,000 ft. In 2 seconds.
Yes!! Is it just me or are things getting more interesting every, single, day, almost by the hour! And I mean good stuff even if it's a failed research project or something like that, but not all the bad crap going on out there.... I've had it with bad crap happening! Let's work together and see what this whole universe thing is about and enjoy the ride! Smile and let's have fun and eat tacos or something! Anything that doesn't hurt anyone! 🍻🌎❤️🌮🔭🚀🎶
@@dexocube appreciate ya! Hope you have a fantastic day and be safe out there! 🍻 P.S. - I see we frequent similar channels, hope to see you around and interact again sometime! 👍🤯
Concorde used to fly over my house every day when I was younger. I was extremely annoying and loud. Any conversations would stop until it had passed over it was so loud. I remember during a French listening exam there had to stop the tape while Concorde flew over which was against the rules but we got away with it did to the shear noise of it.
@mattyice2099 Kind people who design aircraft for the sole purpose of killing. In the US,UK and EU we call the Russians war criminals for bombing Ukraine yet in Vietnam, Iraq or Afghanistan its just collateral damage.
@johnmackay3136 some engineers do, but Like you said yourself, you didn't finish the interview. If you did, you would realize these individuals aren't working on offensive weapon systems. Hypersonic Defense is paramount.
@mattyice2099 Didn't they mention working on the F35 for example? Also lets not pretend its defense, the defense department should really be called the offence department.
@@johnmackay3136 That's just raw ideology though. It doesn't reflect how the world actually is, especially in its nuances. I'm the most anti-war person you'll ever meet. I hate war, and for that matter any violence, and want a global peace order as a ground rule. I think WWII should have taught us that war is obsolete and no longer welcome. The problem is that half of the world's politicians disagree, and to some degree their populations. In my lifetime, I've seen people hacked to death with machetes over ethnic strife. In the Balkans, it was religious issues. In the Middle East it was the US interest in oil, and that wasn't even driven by a defense contractor, but rather an oil infrastructure company (Hallburton). With Ukraine, it's turf, and we're right back to the political drivers of freaking WWII. Does one blame the manufacturer of the machete? Does one blame Mitsubishi or Volkswagen? How about the US Norfolk Naval yard or Portsmouth. Not seriously, you blame the politicians and power players using the tools of war. It doesn't even matter what their politics are, left and right has no meaning in this issue. And they are the problem, not the defense contractors. There will be F-35's that never see combat. There are some that may. But fundamentally they exist solely for security. They'll just fly around and make sure whatever country is operating them has secure air space, rarely will they be used en masse in war. They are no different than the gun the policeman has holstered, it's there if needed, but mostly will stay in its holster. Take away the gun, and you have a bobby with a beating stick because you have to give them something. It's still a potentially lethal beating stick. Take that away, and the pepper spray and taser companies see an uptick in contracts. That's humanity because you will always have someone coming aggressively at the police officer. It's the operator of the gun that introduces the potential issue. The person that makes the decision to shoot it, in this case the armed cop. And in warfare, that's the politicians, and it's always when diplomacy fails. Well, put people in power that don't let diplomacy fail. That would be a good first step. People sometimes don't do that in practice. Take a look, the US president with the least history of warfare since the end of WWII is the most unpopular one. I don't support the guy, but the record is there. Works the same for the UK, the most anti-war politician they've had in any meaningful capacity was the most unpopular PM of the 20th century for being an appeaser of a certain German dictator. Well, that's reality. Do you really think if Taiwan chose not to buy any weapons, China wouldn't assert control over them? No, you can't seriously say that. Especially with how they treated the Hong Kong riots. Russia does the same, and so does the US when it wants to project power such as in Iraq. Well, that's the world. So unless you want to be world emperor and put a stop to all of it, it's moot. And even if you did, well, anyone that's ever tried that in history left a trail of corpses of those that disagreed. That's reality. So what, a company produces weapons. That's not solely what Lockheed does. I couldn't talk about it in this interview because it was the wrong set of scientists in the wrong division, but the fact is Lockheed is trying to develop compact fusion. If they do it successfully, yeah you can make that into a weapon, but you can also power the world without the need for fossil fuels. The entire world, including the developing one. So it goes both ways. And let's not forget, Boeing and Lockheed have at varying times developed the viability of the airline industry as much as defense. Don't believe me? Want a non-US example? Look at Airbus's military contracts. So I think the focus should be put on the politicians. That's where the global problems lie. And yeah, sometimes they are lobbied and affected by defense contractors, but the real issues are how diplomacy is handled. But even then, you're going to have populations of people that have no interest in peace. The hate and rivalry is too engrained down to the very core of those societies. But a defense contractor can just as easily be a peace contractor and better humanity. There's money to be made there. What you can't expect them to do is make bets on it solely by ideology, they are a business not a political theorist, they go where the money is. Where the money is remains to the domain of the politician's choice.
making capable weapons deters your enemy therefore what they are making arguably one of the most beneficial things a country can make if only your brain didn't lack the scope to understand the depth of the scenario, then we'd be cooking
@@SHERMA.Yup, people think our enemies don't have weapons of their own. But when the enemy attacks, the same people who complain about defense spending will be demanding a response.
Our enemy's ( the commies like russia, china, iran and north korea,) would wipe us off the map if we didn't have our own way to insure mutual destruction with nukes or other means. Realize this isn't a soft, peaceful world. We made it that way by building weapons to use and fight and die for freedom.
yeaa... its weird with John really just staying right on track asking about Hypersonics, but no questions about uap? no "what do u think about David Grusch?" 🤨
@@johnruddick686 Yeah, I think it would have to be a case of telerobotics controlled from human settlements on Callisto. I can't remember what the mRem/day is there, just that it's the only Jovian moon on which human outposts are feasible, barring breakthroughs in medicine/gene editing.
True. And what an incredible place it is. JHU "predicted" the anthrax attacks of 2001 with the 'Dark Winter' tabletop exercise six months before it happened and then "predicted" the coronavirus pandemic with 'Clade X' and 'Event 201' tabletop exercises months before it happened. Since they did only 4 of these exercises in total, the first one being 'Dark Winter', their batting average is absolutely outstanding. Very nice people. The crème de la crème.
People don't understand how big lockheed is and the 4 main business areas are expansive and have tons of different top secret programs. It's not like everyone is read into them at all times
Very interesting but there really is very limited use for anyone civilian for this sort of teck. We all know who wants this and why because they have been the driver of the need for year's
If you touch the alien on the left of my comment it's the first video I've got about Asteroid mining. I honestly can't afford to spend the time money and effort creating videos like this if people don't watch them . I've made about 28 space films
Nice one! ill be sure to listn to it at night But I doubt they said anything about how to reduce air resistance using electrostatics or something similar... IF that technology is real, I doubt it is open. Though there are books with math equations that support it (true or false is another topic)..
I hope the next high speed - hypersonic plane is painted black. they just look the coolest like that. Im gettin tired of that jaded _grey_ color they paint everything these days. 😩
what the hell im more then half way thru this and they haven't talked at all about uap? the hearings? John how could u sit there and not have that be your first question. oh right, they probably refused off air.. hoping it gets there in the last quarter
Some might have missed that question, because John was very subtile with it. The answere was in fact very interesting (meteor trajectories) with room for speculation (if they analyse natural phenomenas in the atmosphere for their research they might also look into, you know...).
Interesting that these 3 scientists, who had a pretty hard time explaining the sound speed and the Mach number, are oblivious of competition past and present hypersonic vehicles, including X-37B, Starship, Dream Chaser, X-43 and only briefly mentioning the awesome X-15. Also, they needed the host intervention to mumble something on thin steel structures used ny SpaceX Starship and much ridiculed when used by Soviets on the trisonic MiG-25, back in the ‘60s.
The next 100 years won't have the same progress as the last 100 years. Physics and the materials that exist we are bumping up against. Going mach 10 is going to always be likely to surpass the materials nature allows. Of course we could have some ceramic carbon namo fibre material that is basically a bunch if small strong tubes that fuel is pushed thru at huge volumes to cool the material while heating the fuel to super high levels so that once it atomizes into the ramjet it instantly ignites completely in less than a micro second due to it’s temp and going from huge pressure to almost zero pressure almost instantly.
I love your channel, I’ve listened to it for years. It’s so unfortunate that you show American war machines during your discussion with war criminals from Lockheed Martin
@@westleyburgess3622 you’re just right triggered because some people have morals and principles which are in direct opposition to those of the MIC don’t you little War Pig?!? #CopeHarder!!! LMFAO 💀🇺🇸🤡🐷🤡🇺🇸💀
You need tons more thrust to get out into orbit. This is still aerospace not space systems. Certainly similar craft designs would be present in interplanetary craft.
@@tammysanders4812 by being high profile employees of the company involved in research and development programs they bear just as much of the brunt of responsibility for the unimpeded proliferation of conflicts and war across the world as the CEO and boardroom members do for arming the belligerents involved. Often, and cynically and unironically enough, weaponizing BOTH SIDES. That’s the problem with the entire MIC. No one is willing to take responsibility for the consequences of their actions. Greed rules the day. #WarPigs 💀🐷💀
@@TheTang3rine It's an opportunity to point out that Lockheed Martin is a war profiteering corporate monopoly, manufacturing murder machines for the benefit of an imperialistic hegemon. That said, I'm not holding my breath for John to get remotely political. At least the science is cool. =/
Alot of people will be disappointed to hear that he dosnt ask any questions related to the DoD its all civillian questions related to traveling in our earths atmosphere
![Wolfram Physics Project: Working Session Wednesday, Apr. 29, 2020 [Finding Black Hole Structures]](/img/n.gif)
Great episode!
Whenever there's discussion on high-speed flight, the titanium skin of the SR-71 is always mentioned. There is another material that is seldom mentioned, but equally important-the nickel-chromium-iron alloy Inconel that was used on the X-15.
Correct. Inconel may not have as cool a name as titanium but it is also very important at high temperatures. Some others are Nimonic, Waspalloy and Hastelloy. Worth checking out
This was a brilliant episode. I really appreciate that the Event Horizon team can reach out to such a wide range of people and get them on the show. I could tell that John was enjoying this interview and the engineers bounced off each other so well.
Irony, these guys spend most of their waking lives trying to study and implement my own physics for hypersonics, plasma dynamics, etc. Drew, IO Aircraft formerly phantom works
Wow, that's a very cool interview. I really appreciate y'all getting these guests. You are the best on TH-cam. Thanks!
Mach 12 is approx 9132 miles per hour ? 1975 ? HEAVY G ITS NOT CALLED A WIND SHIELD ? ITS A WIND SCREEN. ? THE X 15 HAS BEEN SITTING IN A MUSEUM FOR MANY YEARS. ? BUT I DO BELIEVE THAT THIS GUY DOES HAVE A B.S DEGREE ???? YABBA DABBA DOO 😮😮😮
What a great interview.
The guests were sharp and knowledgeable. If only they were allowed to talk about anything and everything.
You must have a lot of fans in high places to pull the calibur of guests you've had on this channel!
or, having a Dad who worked in high places of the field wouldn't hurt, either. 😅❤
Having many high fans in low places is also cool.
@@777sibannacnot for guest buddy
@willywonka4340 did john have a dad working in defense or military contractor corp?
@@mattyice2099 yes his late dad did. Let me try to find the episode where he mentioned this. It was one those episodes about the UAPs.
Wow. You knocked the questions out of the park John Michael Godier.
What a treat,
Thank you.
👍🇮🇪👍
this is an AWESOME episode. man, i never would have thought of interviewing lockeed martin engineers. how cool is this.
What a treat and congratulations on securing such esteemed guests! There is no other podcast I would rather listen to at night than this.
Imagine if we compensated raw science the way we compensate defense spending--These guys could just work on going fast without directly supporting economy-draining activities like wars, and the gross waste and corruption in the defense industry.
Or simply take 5% of the US defense budget to solve world hunger and then take the rest to stop climate change
Amen!!!!! ☮️🙏🍻
(whisper) Zoom-Zoom
As posted on an arpanet successor, on silicon processes originally used for military radios
@dongiovanni4331 you seriously think war is the mother of all invention? pfff
Best event horizon episode ever. All politics aside…these guys were so easy to listen to with such a fascinating subject. Great questions John.
Three special guests your spoiling us John Michael Godier. Event horizons is my go to show for current thinking and best guests on TH-cam your number 1 in my mind keeping it real in this universe in which we liiiiiiive 😊❤
As a former airline pilot, thank you. A very interesting show. Please keep up the good work.
This channel just gets better n better. ✌🏼
I felt really smart for being able to understand about a quarter of this 😅
You are indeed!
This channel is equally good for feeling smart or stupid
What an amazing interview with great questions and great answers!
This and the Vatican observatory episodes are a must listen. Already one of the all time favourites
That is the best TH-cam video I have watched in ages. Awesome work. 10/10 to our scientists and engineers.
Lockheed "hey john, how can we get you to stop talking about our super secret uaps"
Great interview as always!
Ha!!!
John I appreciate the fact that you can discuss SR71 technology in our own atmosphere with the same curiosity and enthusiasm that you do with Von Newmann probes and Dyson Spheres. Thank you!!
Dang John one heck of a great episode...Awesome guests. Hands down the best Podcast channels on Yt.
Wowee! I hecken LOVE the military industrial complex now!
Excellent interview! I’d still like hear in discrete words if some of our Lockheed professionals have gained the ability to replicate or reproduce alien vehicles, or otherwise build non-aerodynamic vehicles capable of buoyancy in a gravitational field. Thanks!
That. Was. AMAZING!! Thank you John. Wonderful as always, and just getting better!! ❤
Very intriguing that these guys want to speak in generalities about applications (“not just Earth”)
This is an extraordinary interview. I was glued to this
Or they can just release the uaps they have
I doubt even these incredible engineers are read into those black budget programs. Probably no longer any military contractor industry knows but only a tiny percentage. 😊
Interesting conversation, By the time anyone has figured out commercial hypersonic we are all hopping on a Starship city to city.
John Michael godier is climbing the hierarchy of society and asking the real questions
Cool stuff. If you get a round two can you ask about the HF electrical systems for the plane's surface to help with hypersonics? I know the one guy mentioned EE's as part of the equation but now that the tech is public knowledge it seems at least as interesting as the materials science aspect.
I understand so unfortunately little about the physics of flight! This interview's so interesting! As a meta side note, I now understand why the folks who are so excited when listening to your interviews about cosmology. I liked above all else the question about flying on Mars. It's very interesting whether non-rocket-assisted high-speed flight could be be possible there at all-not the Ingenuity scale, but lifting at the least one human and one backpack. :) The answer was… very scientific: it depends on factors we don't yet know. At the very least, we're reasonably sure there are no birds on Mars! I'm scientific to the bone when I'm sciencing, but on this point I'd give the humanity a handicap of a couple centuries and then some-we're not yet offering the vacationers a flyby of Mount Olympus. :)
Amazing conversation and I learned a lot. Thank you.
How could you possibly past on the opportunity to NOT as about the physics and flight characteristics of UAPs? If for no other reason then to see how they reach to the question. That would have been the icing on the cake.
I would like to hear their speculation on how a craft can dissipate the heat generated when moving from 80,000ft to sea level in less than 2 sec.? As them to calculate how many joules are needed to move from sea level flight to 80,000 ft. In 2 seconds.
Put simply: It's just not real.
so looking forward to this interview later today once I have time to pay full attention!
Of course we were all waiting for the “So what’s your take on UAPs?” just in case they’d built one😂😊
i cant HELP falling in love with these shows
John Michael Godier makes a great football chant.
Yes!! Is it just me or are things getting more interesting every, single, day, almost by the hour! And I mean good stuff even if it's a failed research project or something like that, but not all the bad crap going on out there.... I've had it with bad crap happening! Let's work together and see what this whole universe thing is about and enjoy the ride! Smile and let's have fun and eat tacos or something! Anything that doesn't hurt anyone! 🍻🌎❤️🌮🔭🚀🎶
I'm with you bro
@@dexocube appreciate ya! Hope you have a fantastic day and be safe out there! 🍻
P.S. - I see we frequent similar channels, hope to see you around and interact again sometime! 👍🤯
You do know what Lockheed Martin do?
@@tconbo4514 make Ricky Bobby go fast? 🤔🚁🛫🚀🚳❓
Good timing, I was just yawning and feeling ready for bed 🙂
John, love the show. But to have Lockheed on but not ask about uap seems a bit of a missed opportunity…
I love the B roll footage of those beautifully warbirds
When im in an evil person competition and my opponents are defense contractors
You are in the wrong competition son
Very interesting an informitative !!!
Too bad they can't go into the really interesting things though !!!
Great video and information !
Concorde used to fly over my house every day when I was younger. I was extremely annoying and loud. Any conversations would stop until it had passed over it was so loud. I remember during a French listening exam there had to stop the tape while Concorde flew over which was against the rules but we got away with it did to the shear noise of it.
Amazing interview, John!!! Thanks a BUNCH! 😃
Stay safe there with your family! 🖖😊
Get me some badass skunkworks engineers. Yes please!
Certainly very impressive engineers in this interview. I know two of them. Incredibly smart AND kind people.
@mattyice2099 Kind people who design aircraft for the sole purpose of killing.
In the US,UK and EU we call the Russians war criminals for bombing Ukraine yet in Vietnam, Iraq or Afghanistan its just collateral damage.
@johnmackay3136 some engineers do, but Like you said yourself, you didn't finish the interview. If you did, you would realize these individuals aren't working on offensive weapon systems. Hypersonic Defense is paramount.
@mattyice2099 Didn't they mention working on the F35 for example?
Also lets not pretend its defense, the defense department should really be called the offence department.
@@johnmackay3136 That's just raw ideology though. It doesn't reflect how the world actually is, especially in its nuances. I'm the most anti-war person you'll ever meet. I hate war, and for that matter any violence, and want a global peace order as a ground rule. I think WWII should have taught us that war is obsolete and no longer welcome. The problem is that half of the world's politicians disagree, and to some degree their populations. In my lifetime, I've seen people hacked to death with machetes over ethnic strife. In the Balkans, it was religious issues. In the Middle East it was the US interest in oil, and that wasn't even driven by a defense contractor, but rather an oil infrastructure company (Hallburton). With Ukraine, it's turf, and we're right back to the political drivers of freaking WWII. Does one blame the manufacturer of the machete? Does one blame Mitsubishi or Volkswagen? How about the US Norfolk Naval yard or Portsmouth. Not seriously, you blame the politicians and power players using the tools of war.
It doesn't even matter what their politics are, left and right has no meaning in this issue. And they are the problem, not the defense contractors. There will be F-35's that never see combat. There are some that may. But fundamentally they exist solely for security. They'll just fly around and make sure whatever country is operating them has secure air space, rarely will they be used en masse in war. They are no different than the gun the policeman has holstered, it's there if needed, but mostly will stay in its holster. Take away the gun, and you have a bobby with a beating stick because you have to give them something. It's still a potentially lethal beating stick. Take that away, and the pepper spray and taser companies see an uptick in contracts. That's humanity because you will always have someone coming aggressively at the police officer.
It's the operator of the gun that introduces the potential issue. The person that makes the decision to shoot it, in this case the armed cop. And in warfare, that's the politicians, and it's always when diplomacy fails. Well, put people in power that don't let diplomacy fail. That would be a good first step. People sometimes don't do that in practice. Take a look, the US president with the least history of warfare since the end of WWII is the most unpopular one. I don't support the guy, but the record is there. Works the same for the UK, the most anti-war politician they've had in any meaningful capacity was the most unpopular PM of the 20th century for being an appeaser of a certain German dictator. Well, that's reality.
Do you really think if Taiwan chose not to buy any weapons, China wouldn't assert control over them? No, you can't seriously say that. Especially with how they treated the Hong Kong riots. Russia does the same, and so does the US when it wants to project power such as in Iraq. Well, that's the world. So unless you want to be world emperor and put a stop to all of it, it's moot. And even if you did, well, anyone that's ever tried that in history left a trail of corpses of those that disagreed. That's reality.
So what, a company produces weapons. That's not solely what Lockheed does. I couldn't talk about it in this interview because it was the wrong set of scientists in the wrong division, but the fact is Lockheed is trying to develop compact fusion. If they do it successfully, yeah you can make that into a weapon, but you can also power the world without the need for fossil fuels. The entire world, including the developing one. So it goes both ways. And let's not forget, Boeing and Lockheed have at varying times developed the viability of the airline industry as much as defense. Don't believe me? Want a non-US example? Look at Airbus's military contracts.
So I think the focus should be put on the politicians. That's where the global problems lie. And yeah, sometimes they are lobbied and affected by defense contractors, but the real issues are how diplomacy is handled. But even then, you're going to have populations of people that have no interest in peace. The hate and rivalry is too engrained down to the very core of those societies. But a defense contractor can just as easily be a peace contractor and better humanity. There's money to be made there. What you can't expect them to do is make bets on it solely by ideology, they are a business not a political theorist, they go where the money is. Where the money is remains to the domain of the politician's choice.
Maverick is a brilliant film.
I bet the dark star isn't far from becoming a real craft. Probably would be A.I flown or a drone.
Imagine if these brilliant engineers could work on something that actually benefited humanity? Then we’d be cooking
We would be on mars already if we werent so busy blowing ourselves up.
making capable weapons deters your enemy
therefore what they are making arguably one of the most beneficial things a country can make
if only your brain didn't lack the scope to understand the depth of the scenario, then we'd be cooking
@@SHERMA.Yeah, you're the problem.
@@SHERMA.Yup, people think our enemies don't have weapons of their own. But when the enemy attacks, the same people who complain about defense spending will be demanding a response.
Our enemy's ( the commies like russia, china, iran and north korea,) would wipe us off the map if we didn't have our own way to insure mutual destruction with nukes or other means. Realize this isn't a soft, peaceful world. We made it that way by building weapons to use and fight and die for freedom.
Great guests , awesome show !
Am I the only one that got the feeling this entire conversation was a big innuendo with a bit of foreshadowing at the end?
yeaa... its weird with John really just staying right on track asking about Hypersonics, but no questions about uap? no "what do u think about David Grusch?" 🤨
That's a completely different subject
Manned exploration of Jupiter?? I guess I never even thought that would be possible...Wow.🤔
Me neither, but we can be pretty crafty bastards, after all.
I would have thought the radiation levels would probably be lethal around Jupiter to humans.
@@johnruddick686 Yeah, I think it would have to be a case of telerobotics controlled from human settlements on Callisto. I can't remember what the mRem/day is there, just that it's the only Jovian moon on which human outposts are feasible, barring breakthroughs in medicine/gene editing.
John, you had Lockheed on and didn’t ask about the downed UFOs?!
Ikr , suspicious , they talk about mach speed so much but we all know what they really have,
Hypersonic and antigrav are very different i think lol
I wonder if there's a relationship between shock diamonds from thrust and sonic booms?
Thanks Mr G , for another great show i really feel I've been to " THE DANGER ZONE !!! " keep on Keeping on. PEACE and LOVE to EVERYONE ❤❤.
As always....Art Bell level.
Wow
This is a great episode! More like this please! Cutting edge science and engineering, and no UFOs in sight.
I love this channel there is never a bad episode. Always thought provoking interesting and informative.
Fantastic work, John 🙏
Excellent episode!
Is 3:50 an accurate statement? I thought Mach changed with density of material not temperature….
You are correct, it is a function of temperature and pressure leading to overall density. Peter was able to fill in what I left out.
@@FoolsGaming I prob should’ve listened for longer so I’d known he clarified that. But I wanted to get my knowitall points
Temperature is synonymous with density. Temperature is not really a definable concept in science it it very different depending on where you are.
Does anyone know why meteorites don’t make a sonic boom?
Really awesome episode
how do you make things that fly several times the speed of sound while making them look so cool.
They look so cool because they fly 5 times speed of sound lol
Lol yall just going to ignore the elephant in the room? Seriously? Did Lockheed pay you to do this?
Explain, please.
@@Kustan112 Look at what journalist Ross Coulthart is saying about Lockheed.
But It's Not REAL.
Amazing content! thanks so much :)
You have fallen into a SPECIAL event horizon oh boy let’s go
Can a fluid be modified to contain another fluid?
Must have been very hard to bite your lip to not ask where they are hiding the saucer lol
1:55 It's The Johns Hopkins University, not John Hopkins
True. And what an incredible place it is. JHU "predicted" the anthrax attacks of 2001 with the 'Dark Winter' tabletop exercise six months before it happened and then "predicted" the coronavirus pandemic with 'Clade X' and 'Event 201' tabletop exercises months before it happened. Since they did only 4 of these exercises in total, the first one being 'Dark Winter', their batting average is absolutely outstanding. Very nice people. The crème de la crème.
*Katsumi Orochi was here*
I thought that was very clever when they said they designed it to have flakes of the craft fall off to help disipate heat.
Isn’t going hypersonic old news?
Interesting...
Lockheed is one of the main players rumoured to be in the possession of non human tech..
And they have SO much to tell about mach speeds when we all heard what kind of things they really have....
Yeah well almost nobody in lockheed would even know about that. Need to know.
Alienz! 👽
Hoomans actually 👴
Hey, can you interview Eamonn Ansbro?
Need to research his work. Thanks for the suggestion.
After talking about the UAP reverse engineering program, it makes sense to talk to the people who works for the perpetrators themselves 😅
No these r extra special 😄
Will they speak about the UAP/UFO issue ?
They might be the ones most qualified to express their thoughts on UAP'S I suppose.
@@arodderz SInce they got at least one, I'd say so :P
People don't understand how big lockheed is and the 4 main business areas are expansive and have tons of different top secret programs. It's not like everyone is read into them at all times
Very interesting but there really is very limited use for anyone civilian for this sort of teck. We all know who wants this and why because they have been the driver of the need for year's
Should of asked about UAP/UFO materials.
Hermeus Quarterhorse with a Chimera engine.
If you touch the alien on the left of my comment it's the first video I've got about Asteroid mining. I honestly can't afford to spend the time money and effort creating videos like this if people don't watch them . I've made about 28 space films
Nice one! ill be sure to listn to it at night But I doubt they said anything about how to reduce air resistance using electrostatics or something similar... IF that technology is real, I doubt it is open. Though there are books with math equations that support it (true or false is another topic)..
I hope the next high speed - hypersonic plane is painted black. they just look the coolest like that. Im gettin tired of that jaded _grey_ color they paint everything these days. 😩
what the hell im more then half way thru this and they haven't talked at all about uap? the hearings? John how could u sit there and not have that be your first question. oh right, they probably refused off air.. hoping it gets there in the last quarter
Some might have missed that question, because John was very subtile with it. The answere was in fact very interesting (meteor trajectories) with room for speculation (if they analyse natural phenomenas in the atmosphere for their research they might also look into, you know...).
Where’s the UAP questions 🤔
Doubt john could even get people from lockheed to talk about that.
What happens if one heats an entangled particle/material while cooling it’s twin particle?
Granted it
Where can I send my video because every time I posted the link it gets deleted.
Interesting that these 3 scientists, who had a pretty hard time explaining the sound speed and the Mach number, are oblivious of competition past and present hypersonic vehicles, including X-37B, Starship, Dream Chaser, X-43 and only briefly mentioning the awesome X-15. Also, they needed the host intervention to mumble something on thin steel structures used ny SpaceX Starship and much ridiculed when used by Soviets on the trisonic MiG-25, back in the ‘60s.
The next 100 years won't have the same progress as the last 100 years. Physics and the materials that exist we are bumping up against. Going mach 10 is going to always be likely to surpass the materials nature allows.
Of course we could have some ceramic carbon namo fibre material that is basically a bunch if small strong tubes that fuel is pushed thru at huge volumes to cool the material while heating the fuel to super high levels so that once it atomizes into the ramjet it instantly ignites completely in less than a micro second due to it’s temp and going from huge pressure to almost zero pressure almost instantly.
I love your channel, I’ve listened to it for years.
It’s so unfortunate that you show American war machines during your discussion with war criminals from Lockheed Martin
💯✅🍻
Unicorns and cupcakes on other channels.
@@westleyburgess3622 you’re just right triggered because some people have morals and principles which are in direct opposition to those of the MIC don’t you little War Pig?!? #CopeHarder!!! LMFAO
💀🇺🇸🤡🐷🤡🇺🇸💀
JMG tell them to leak the zero point energy , power generator schematics!!
U better ask if there is space ships here buddy I'm counting on u
You mean over there at Lockheed
That shot of the plane at 4 mins plus looks organic like a frog or rodent
The hyper speed angle opens the door to space planes I think..
You need tons more thrust to get out into orbit. This is still aerospace not space systems. Certainly similar craft designs would be present in interplanetary craft.
Nice plug for the military industrial complex 🙄
You'd rather pretend these people don't exist? It's valuable to get their side. It doesn't mean you have to take it as gospel.
@@tammysanders4812 by being high profile employees of the company involved in research and development programs they bear just as much of the brunt of responsibility for the unimpeded proliferation of conflicts and war across the world as the CEO and boardroom members do for arming the belligerents involved. Often, and cynically and unironically enough, weaponizing BOTH SIDES. That’s the problem with the entire MIC. No one is willing to take responsibility for the consequences of their actions. Greed rules the day. #WarPigs
💀🐷💀
@@tammysanders4812we shouldnt give these people a platform at all
@@TheTang3rine It's an opportunity to point out that Lockheed Martin is a war profiteering corporate monopoly, manufacturing murder machines for the benefit of an imperialistic hegemon. That said, I'm not holding my breath for John to get remotely political. At least the science is cool. =/
Lovely war profiteers featured on your channel! 😅
You know of any aerospace engineers
Alot of people will be disappointed to hear that he dosnt ask any questions related to the DoD its all civillian questions related to traveling in our earths atmosphere
I assume the guest requested no questions about the elephants in the room.
He won't get an answer anyway.