How to enrich Uranium - Periodic Table of Videos

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ก.ย. 2009
  • Uranium enrichment has been in the headlines lately - but what does it mean exactly?
    More links in description below ↓↓↓
    Support Periodic Videos on Patreon: / periodicvideos
    A video on every element: bit.ly/118elements
    More at www.periodicvideos.com/
    Follow us on Facebook at / periodicvideos
    And on Twitter at / periodicvideos
    From the School of Chemistry at The University of Nottingham: bit.ly/NottChem
    Periodic Videos films are by video journalist Brady Haran: www.bradyharanblog.com
    Join Brady's mailing list for updates and extra stuff --- eepurl.com/YdjL9
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 282

  • @spuddoesthings5071
    @spuddoesthings5071 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1375

    This man looks like science

  • @TehOak
    @TehOak 11 ปีที่แล้ว +179

    I could listen to this guy all day. I wish I had someone as interesting as this when I was at school. What a legend.

  • @CanadianBalrog
    @CanadianBalrog 11 ปีที่แล้ว +329

    We're all on the government's list now, man.

  • @MarkHirstSWL
    @MarkHirstSWL 14 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    If people like the Professor and his colleagues were on TV more often than some of the 'science journalists', the public would be much better informed about these sort of issues.
    Please keep up the good work!

  • @Frost87112
    @Frost87112 12 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    the puffy hair makes him look more legit.

  • @j7ndominica051
    @j7ndominica051 9 ปีที่แล้ว +107

    I respect Professor Martyn Poliakoff for explaining these processes in as much detail as possible within the time allotted, and without witholding key knowledge. Other authors here would rather experience and learn 'for' us, and only film the results to boast about what they have obtained in dangerous experiments. The Professor didn't as us a membership of his college, or certain prior knowledge or experience with materials, which is unlike how it usually happens.

  • @TheSMLIFfilms
    @TheSMLIFfilms 11 ปีที่แล้ว +130

    i am officially closer to nuclear weapons than north korea

  • @punishedexistence
    @punishedexistence 13 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I love how the Prof's glasses double as safety goggles, that is a dedicated man. Always enjoy listening to him explain things, very articulate and easy to understand. As always, very informative video!

  • @bjently
    @bjently 6 ปีที่แล้ว +90

    This man is science in human form.

  • @FatumAlpha
    @FatumAlpha 10 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    7:41 "I think like a lot of things in life the basic idea is really simple, but actually executing it, so you don't end up with clouds of radioactife UF6 pouring all over the place is actually not trivial."
    I totally hear you. :-D

  • @KaiPlews
    @KaiPlews 9 ปีที่แล้ว +69

    Well darn, there goes my weekend science project with the kids. I guess its plan B, make some triazadienyl fluoride.

  • @GuppyPal
    @GuppyPal 14 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I love science! Videos like this inspire me to learn all that I can and do better in my studies. Thanks, periodicvideos.

  • @theromans6108
    @theromans6108 14 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for all the videos you've made for us prof.
    I greatly enjoy them and find them so informative!
    Much love from California, US.

  • @pamuva
    @pamuva 9 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    depleted Uranium is used in aircraft as a mass balance weight for flight controls to control high speed "flutter". uncontrolled flight control flutter can destroy an aircraft in seconds. (search on youtube for vids) so depleted uranium is used to ensure everything is balanced, and hence, stop flutter.

  • @FNPetersen
    @FNPetersen 11 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Weapons grade uranium makes a perfectly stable and controllable reactor. In fact, it tends to have a more negative temperature coefficient of reactivity than commercial grade.

  • @nicougrikify
    @nicougrikify 9 ปีที่แล้ว +190

    Uranium and fluorine.. who the hell got that idea ? hahah sounds like a scary compound.

  • @brotheryang
    @brotheryang 13 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Two things i want from this guy First is his mind or at least some of his knowledge and the second is his hair i just love it.

  • @skonkfactory
    @skonkfactory 14 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The photo of the Manhattan Project enrichment facility was actually a photo of the calutron, which was basically a huge mass spectrometer. It worked by using a beam of uranium ions and a magnetic field; the heavier particles were deflected less by the field as they had more kinetic energy.

  • @MrGreencat5
    @MrGreencat5 11 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    He has a water bottle collection. he started it because he said he had one in a lecture and then decided he needed to make one, so if anyone asked to see it he would have something to show them.

  • @TngMutantNinjaTroll
    @TngMutantNinjaTroll 11 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Not if you want to make bombs but U238 was, in fact, weaponized. U238 is heavier and has higher density then Lead so military used it to make armor piercing ammunition and heavier ordnance because, being heavier, depleted uranium projectile carries more kinetic energy and it's hardness allows it to pierce hard materials(like armor) instead of squashing itself on them like lead projectiles do.

  • @gbponz
    @gbponz 14 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Depleted uranium is used both in ammo, specically in antitank, and in armor. It is used for its density, and in the case of armor piercing ammmo, for its incendiary properties.

  • @PsychoStorm88
    @PsychoStorm88 14 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Another fantastically informative video! Loved it!
    Thanks guys!!

  • @dannyboyfour
    @dannyboyfour 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    Man these videos are awesome! and this is my favourite one so far!
    Keep up the great work :)

  • @ThePhildalegend
    @ThePhildalegend 14 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This may sound like an overused cliche but this scientist actually makes science interesting. lol

  • @Clint945
    @Clint945 10 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Typically 90%+ is concidered weapons grade.
    You don't need much of it to make a bomb, but it needs to be close to pure U235 in order for the bomb to be effective.
    By comparison, 5% U235 would be perfectly suitable for a reactor.
    So you can quite easily tell the difference between weapons and reactor grade, you won't "accidentally" make weapons grade stuff.

  • @zillionz
    @zillionz 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    I would go to study in the University of Nottingham just to study under this scientist... very easy listen to and knows EXACTLY what he is talking about, and could put Uranium enrichment considerations into complete layman's terms so anyone could understand it, which is an important aspect of being a great scientist. great channel, subbed

  • @SCARRIOR
    @SCARRIOR 10 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    You can tell he was going to do a mad scientist evil laugh at 2:35

  • @00a00s00d00f00
    @00a00s00d00f00 14 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    As always, wonderful video. Thank you for posting.

  • @dhwanitchem
    @dhwanitchem 14 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent and Flawless editing!!

  • @Wysthric
    @Wysthric 13 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That was fantastic, both of you. I wasn't aware one isotope was used destructively and one constructively - this has been good to know. :D

  • @BurningFeetMan
    @BurningFeetMan 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bravo. Wonderful video! I absolutely love watching these!!!

  • @ethanmarcus2089
    @ethanmarcus2089 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks this was super cool, uranium is my favorite element on the periodic table, if I could make a request, could you talk about the superactinides?

  • @iseesquares
    @iseesquares 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    this is a very interesting subject
    i have been studying atoms in my grade 10 science class and barely understood because my teacher rushed through , i have learned more from this professor than my school teacher :D
    thank you

  • @EzyoMusic
    @EzyoMusic 14 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You guys are great! Awesome video.

  • @KarbineKyle
    @KarbineKyle 13 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Uranium and other actinides (metallic form) are also pyrophoric (meaning it can oxidize easily with the air, causing sparks from the fine particles to ingite and even cause a fire.) The seperation of isotopes such as U-235 from U-238 requires a lot of energy. Many actinide isotopes are very unstable and radioactive, that they produce their own thermal radiation (heat), that they must be stored inside tungsten carbide. It has a much higher melting point than lead, and good radiation shielding.

  • @Legolaaa
    @Legolaaa 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sweet deal! I had no idea of how they enriched Uranium!
    UF6 definitely one of my favorite compounds now :P
    Great video!

  • @xpinkdrummerx
    @xpinkdrummerx 14 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    wow ! i love these videos !! really informative ! and interesting

  • @StephenSternGoth
    @StephenSternGoth 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    wow you are very good at explaining that watched how it's made and another video but you make more sense

  • @hagiadzo
    @hagiadzo 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    I learned all about this in my high school chemistry class, as I grew up very close to the Goodyear Uranium Enrichment Plant in southern Ohio. Gaseous diffusion operations were shut down a few years ago, and now they've begun using centrifuge technology to enrich uranium to a non-weapons grade assay.

  • @sherlock72
    @sherlock72 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow, Great Explanation! Thank You very Much!

  • @Truthiness231
    @Truthiness231 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yeah same here. It's definitely one of the best TH-cam video series out there.

  • @HansVanIngelgom
    @HansVanIngelgom 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    IIRC, there are about 3-4 talks about liquid thorium fluoride ractors at googletechtalks. But it's great you mention it, I've always wanted to know the professors' opinion about the subject. In any case, I liked watching them, it's a mix between nuclear physics and chemistry.

  • @RyuseiKitadama
    @RyuseiKitadama 11 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I'm curious why 235 is more radioactive than 238. What is it about the internal structure of the nucleus having 3 fewer neutrons that enables it to overcome the strong nuclear force. Is it the repulsiveness of the positrons that prevents them from being able to pack together too tightly? Is that what results in beta+ decay?

  • @moneill8t6
    @moneill8t6 14 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    7:51 "Clouds of radioactive UF6 pouring all over the place!!" Epic!

  • @MVrockersPS3
    @MVrockersPS3 12 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    thanks for the tut!

  • @JerryKitich
    @JerryKitich 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    did a little research "DU counterweights have been used primarily in wide-body aircraft on rudders, outboard ailerons (wing assembly), and outboard elevators (tail assembly). Counterweights come in a variety of weights and shapes, and numerous weights and shapes are used in some aircraft. The DU counterweight can range in weight from 0.23 to 77 kg."
    "Some aircraft used for military and cargo also use DU The Boeing Company made helicopters using DU as a rotor tip weight prior to 1979.

  • @hawks1ish
    @hawks1ish 9 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    A centrifuge enrichment facility only takes up the space and energy requirements of a supermarket whereas a diffusion enrichment facility takes up acres and acres of space and ridiculous amounts of electricity.

  • @MephistoRolling
    @MephistoRolling 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    excellent explanation helped a lot!

  • @OZ1OS
    @OZ1OS 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank You so much for Your instructive and AWESOME videos! :-)

  • @TurboXtr3me
    @TurboXtr3me 9 ปีที่แล้ว +142

    whats with scientists and the crazy hair?

  • @xja85mac
    @xja85mac 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wonderful explanation!

  • @alanna4858
    @alanna4858 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    oooooh its a looong one!!! I love them.... wow! thanks guys. much appreciated!

  • @spencerchamp
    @spencerchamp 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for making a video on this! I now have a way to enrich my Uranium.

  • @JosephCoxH
    @JosephCoxH 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent as usual.

  • @IcedStick
    @IcedStick 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    very informative, thank you.

  • @DoktorBaglioni
    @DoktorBaglioni 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    Superb explanation!

  • @RustyCyler
    @RustyCyler 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    very cool video guys, I learned a lot.

  • @safolincon
    @safolincon 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very Educative. Thanks!

  • @shamarone
    @shamarone 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I must say, I was very fortunate to have an interesting professor for chemistry. not quite equal with this gent, but very close.

  • @mj23thegoat
    @mj23thegoat 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow, I learned something today. Thanks

  • @dclaver2
    @dclaver2 13 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    So if you have 99.3% U238 and .7% U235 in a jar, how do separate the 235 from 238? He might have said it in the video, and if he did then I missed it.

  • @LOLHAMMER45678
    @LOLHAMMER45678 11 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    8,000 of these views are from the DPRK

  • @JonatanGronoset
    @JonatanGronoset 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for explaining the enrichment process. I'm interested in nuclear science so this was good help. :3

  • @ethanmarcus2089
    @ethanmarcus2089 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is awesome uranium is my favorite element on the periodic table

  • @carl95125
    @carl95125 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The pic you showed in the video was the "Alpha Track Calutron at the Y-12 Plant at Oak Ridge, Tennessee from the Manhattan Project, used for uranium enrichment."ref: "Calutron"-Wikipedia using electromagnetic isotope separation. K-25 was the gaseous diffusion plant. Read about "Enriched Uranium" on Wikipedia...

  • @pachris
    @pachris 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great vid, explains a lot. Can I ask you something Prof? What would you have to do with 235 after the whole process... how much less stable is it? Is it hard to handle? These are all particles right? Is it hard to get the mined uranium ready for the centrifuge and to take it out after the process? 238 is a lot less reactive? How much is a lot? Precautions in the lab? Thx!

  • @____42
    @____42 9 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This professor is brilliant!

  • @cetGT3
    @cetGT3 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    where can I get hold of the raw material???

  • @RikvanDoorn1
    @RikvanDoorn1 11 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    i want this guy as my science teacher...

  • @Depthhider
    @Depthhider 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    Now correct me if im wrong, but i am pretty shure that the teflon was not used for ww2, that picture he showed where calutrons, huge elctomagnetic seperators. The u 238 was fed through the magnetic field and due to the different masses the 235 would be seperated, though this process was slow and required a lot of calutrons. I recently visted Oakridge and everything i saw and heard never once mentioned teflon.

  • @beeble2003
    @beeble2003 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Actually, the Manhattan Project used electromagnetic separation in cyclotrons, as well as the gaseous diffusion method mentioned in the video. It was the magnetic windings of the cyclotrons that required the loan of nearly 15,000 tons of silver from the US Treasury.

  • @TeamVacaville
    @TeamVacaville 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fascinating!

  • @cyberprodigy
    @cyberprodigy 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice explanation

  • @laurasayshello
    @laurasayshello 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    loveee these videos! :)

  • @iseesquares
    @iseesquares 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    i love the professor!

  • @SomeDude881
    @SomeDude881 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    I don't know why but you look really smart! I think it is because of your hair. Good informative video.

  • @therealsporadicaarmy
    @therealsporadicaarmy 14 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    depleted U238 is also used for armor piercing bullets

  • @morlanius
    @morlanius 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    You didnt talk about bombardment enrichment, I've read about it being done, although the process is not a far cry from a stack reactor with a central target, but I don't understand why you need to have the material in the target in a substrate, why is this?
    Love your videos!

  • @ASAM90
    @ASAM90 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very helpful!
    Respect and love from pakistan for u sir.

  • @Itfeelsmoist
    @Itfeelsmoist ปีที่แล้ว

    Great Scott

  • @diamonddill
    @diamonddill 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    man this is good stuff!! i really enjoy these videos. just a thought... maybe if he filmed in front of a green screen.. he could make the background look as if he was giving this lecture from frankenstein laboratory hehe.. now that would be pretty cool

  • @CanadaJarod
    @CanadaJarod 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    yes, its sometimes used as a core to give armor piercing rounds more mass which means they can hit with more power, however it is not used as a nuclear weapon it self

  • @MoltenMetal613
    @MoltenMetal613 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    @petokyo UF6 is symmetrical, leaving no area of the molecule significantly more negatively-charged than the other. This means that the intermolecular forces between the molecules are very weak. Also, because the compound is no longer a metal, it does not have the metallic bonding that uranium has.

  • @Flapjacktastic
    @Flapjacktastic 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    i love that guys hair! :D

  • @alvarocafe
    @alvarocafe 9 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    I love your videos! Have you thought about making a video about the liquid fluoride thorium reactor (LFTR)?

  • @radishpineapple74
    @radishpineapple74 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    The slower velocity is important in the diffusion method of enrichment, but this doesn't mean anything in a centrifuge. Centrifuges basically create an artificial "gravity." As you know, gravity causes heavier things to sink to the bottom and lighter things to float up top. Note the stratification of the earth itself - heavy iron is at the bottom and gases are at the top.
    "Bottom" in a centrifuge is near the edge, and "top" is in the center, where "gravity" (centrifugal force) is the the least.

  • @manque15
    @manque15 14 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    My friend is a scientist and he keeps sending these vlogs to me, I suppose in the hope that I might become wiser about science...well we all know this is an excise in futility!

  • @gvi341984
    @gvi341984 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks again

  • @yakir11114
    @yakir11114 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    yes, armor piecing bullets, bunker busters.. a projecting penetrates its target better when its mass is concentrated in a smaller place, like with uranium 238.

  • @clappyslapper
    @clappyslapper 14 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    keep up the good work!

  • @DailyGrower
    @DailyGrower 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love his hair

  • @RealRaynedance
    @RealRaynedance 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    AAaaaah I just started with atoms and stuff today in Physical Science... time to finally make good use of these videos :D

  • @SchiferlED
    @SchiferlED 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    For any given element, there is a certain isotope(amount of neutrons) that is most stable. Going above or below this number decreases the stability of the nucleus. 238 just happens to be closer to the stable isotope (if not the most stable isotope, I'm not sure) than 235.

  • @JupiterRoom
    @JupiterRoom 14 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    sure, so where can I buy neutrons? I couldnt find any on ebay.

  • @wassahilden
    @wassahilden 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    Brilliant.

  • @AbitrarySage
    @AbitrarySage 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    1000th like! And great video, as usual.

  • @almurabiton
    @almurabiton 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @mint285e oh I am happy to know that , and thank you Dear

  • @shadowraptor888
    @shadowraptor888 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    nice to know, tnx for the recap ;-)

  • @kennethdehart8748
    @kennethdehart8748 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Even if I had like a ton of americium? Say I took apart like 300 smoke detectors and packed it all inside the lead pipe, would that generate enough neutrons? And is there any way to direct the neutron radiation (like basically shooting it). Also, I have a lot of radium paint (struck a gold mine at an antique mall on the clocks), is it true you can use radium instead of using americium to create neutron particles?

  • @carlosewm
    @carlosewm 13 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Who the hell thumbed down the video deserves to be enriched with Uranium 235.