KALAM 3.0 - A Modern Update To Kalam | AJAR PODCAST
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 11 ก.ย. 2024
- A special podcast session on Kalam 3.0, role of science in proving God, how Muslims proved the universe began to exist before Einstein and more.
Hamza Karamali specializes in developing Islamic educational responses to the problem of atheism. You can get a taste of his work by going to quraniccasefor... to get a free video series on a powerful Quranic argument for the existence of God that will silence any atheist. You can also learn more about his work by visitingwhyislamistrue....
Thanks to klpodcast studio for sponsoring this session : klpodcast.studio/
Mā shā Allāh! Hebat. Berjaya bawa Sheikh Hamza Karamali to Malaysia & to your podcast. We need more like this in the future. We need muslim shuyukh like him in Malaysia, which I believe is lacking quality asatizah.
Aku mmg peminat sheikh ni .. tak sangka Ajar jemput beliau ..😊😊
Terbaik Ahli Kalam!! Sokong sepenuhnya
baru je tgk video shaikh di channel Dr Shadee Elmasry. tak sangka shaikh ade di Malaysia minggu sudah MashaAllah
Kalam menjadi satu perbincangan yg amat luas dan complicated 😅 sehinggakan dizaman terdahulu seperti dizaman khulafa' ar rasyidin tetap diperbincangkan secara hangat sehingga menyebabkan perbelacahan kaum dan agama islam 😢 walhal perkara tersebut seperti tidak perlu dipertikaikan kerana cuba melawan takdir dan perkara yg benar-ii perlu diamali ❤ semoga dgn podcast ini kita dpt memahami masalah tersebut dgn secara ilmiah dan muslimah
Yeay... Video baru... Tak sabar tunggu MLATS minggu ni... Macam2 idea orang share dalam reddit.😅😂
di baru betul podcast bukan macam satu channel tu inv orang bukan ii mcm daddy. takde class mcm tu. podcast macam channel ajar ni yg bagus
Aku tak tuduh, tapi kalau sebut ilmu kalam ini adalah fahaman Mu’tazilah.
Cara fahaman ini berbeza dengan majoriti umat Islam.
Boleh rujuk fatwa mufti wilayah
TASHIH AL-MAFAHIM #11 : BAHAYA MU’TAZILAH
06 FEBRUARI 2019 ADMIN PMWP
Dia dah mengaku pun ada salah. Kalau salah, berbincanglah. Tunjuklah, kita bincang, fikir2, hubungkan dengan Al Quran dan hadis. Kita nak bersatu, berbeza pendapat pasal yang ranting oklah. Dia kata macam tu. Mengaku salah pun. Manusia kan. Lepas tu, perbetulkan dan perbaiki. Orang beriman kalau dia tersilap dan terlupa, dia akan mengaku je. Tu minta doa Allah jangan hukum kalau lupa dan silap (surah Al Baqarah 286)
Macam sains punya teori. Nama pun teori. Kalau teori mungkin boleh berubah. Bukan tetap lagi. Hanya teori. Macam tu ler
Wallahualam
ilmu kalam adalah ilmu falsafah, imam al-ghazali mengiktiraf ilmu kalam sebagai pengukuhan akidah@@Qu3st_Qu33n
@@orangitulah ingat 73 pintu 73 jalan. Jangan mabuk dengan kehebatan akal kau tu yang sebanyak 10% .
10% je ... tu pun dah rasa hebat ke. 😅 😂😂🤣
Dari sibuk nak melayan pertanyaan atheis hal Allah, baik fikir masalah lain, gunakan sains untuk memajukan umat.
Sekadar cth , cipta kenderaan untuk mudahkan orang pergi haji... itu sepatutnya sains ini, mudahkan orang untuk beribadah.
Hadis Rasulullah SAW bersabda:
Maksudnya: Syaitan akan datang kepada salah seorang daripada kamu dan berkata: ‘Siapa menciptakan ini? Siapa menciptakan ini? Hingga dia berkata: ‘Siapa menciptakan Tuhanmu?’ Sekiranya soalan ini sampai, maka dia (lelaki yang beriman) hendaklah beristighfar kepada Allah dan berhenti (daripada melayani persoalan itu).
(Riwayat al-Bukhari, no. 3276)
Aheist macam tulah... tanya itu ini hal perkara ghaib.. sampai pertanyaan yang bukan-bukan.. baik bla je 😁
Ilmu sains tidak mampu perjelaskan hal Tuhan dengan detail, sebab kalau mampu tentulah quran dapat dicipta oleh manusia.
Itu sebabnya Allah turunkan ilmu wahyu (kitab) kepada nabi.
Bagi menerangkan hal ghaib yang tidak tercapai akal manusia.
@@Qu3st_Qu33n nak kata muktazilah pun x kena sebab Asya'irah rad muktazilah, qadariah, jabariah, jahmiyah
Tahniah ajar TV
semoga anda dapat memainkan peranan dengan sangat bijaksana terhadap suasana dakwah dalam negara yang semakin kompleks dengan pelbagai strategi menggunakan 'teori domino';
Hujah lawan hujah
Kitab lwn kitab
Personaliti lwn personaliti
Attitude lwn attitude
Credential lwn credential
Aliran lawan aliran
Manipulasi kitab
dan sebagainya.
"SAINS ITU SIHIR!!"
-mamat random dari tiktok
Mcm kenal je😂
Seronok dengar
Nice 👍 Guest from outside the country
Boleh masukkan subtitle melayu untuk semua orang boleh tengok?😁
Setuju
Klik dkt auto transelate. Mcm² bahasa ada
@@muhammadsafarin no a proper way to listen and understand. Lagi better tekan auto generate keluar eng subtitle.
@@muhammadsafarin
Tapi tjemahannya tunggang-tebalik😁
Terkejut dengar Ajar cakap BI full 😍😍
A very insightful podcast. One thing that I find lacking is that syeikh does not really explain the examples of kalam 3.0 arguments. I understand the essence of Kalam 3.0 is utilizing the modern science as tools to combat atheism. Is it because Kalam 3.0 is'nt fully fleshed out yet?
Bang buat video tentang angular momentum
Eh ni kan Hazamin Inteam yg nyanyi lagu Ratu Syahadah tu
It was a good topic. Some new generations doesn't care much is it
Kalau boleh Abang Ajar translate la jugak dalam live ada yang kurang faham 😅
Alhamduillah..semua yg Sheikh cakap ni ada dalam pengajian Aqidah Asyairah dan Maturidiyah.. dalil huduth... dalil Imkan... Alam mutaghayyir...
المستغني عن كل ما سواه
المفتقر اليه كل ما عداه
BOLEH TOLONG KUPAS TENTANG CIK ELIN?? ENAKMEN UNDANG2 YANG TERBATAL TU.. 😊
Perbincangan kalam 1.0 dan 2.0 berlaku ketika kemuncak tamadun Islam. Maknanya kalam 3.0 akan berlaku di puncak ke 3 gelombang kebangkitan Islam.
Struggle nya nak faham 😭 semoga tuhan permudahkan
Boleh belajar dulu sifat 20..byak ulama kita ajar... lpas tu bleh delve deep into kalam.. saya pun gitu jgak awal2 dulu... bila kenal dan faham..alhamdulillah.. syukur atas nikmat islam
53:16 The people in Gaza suffering because muslimin in love with dunya, but why Shi'a make the first move?
Assalamualaikum tuan. Boleh tak buat video berkaitan kalendar? Sy rasa umur manusia tidak dikira dgn tepat pada zaman Rasulullah SAW dan sebelumnya? 😊
1st 👍
wow
Buat la subtitle
kalau kita ubah cara kita pandang sains, adakah kita perlu ubah justifikasi hukum?
adakah konsep syariah (jinayat muamalat munakahat ibadat) memberi kesan kepada pandangan kita terhadap ilmu sains sekarang, atau sebaliknya? mohon pencerahan. terima kasih
point worth looking into: mutakalimun and scientist should gather together and workout something.
points worth commenting: Sheikh seems to contradict himself when he said science is knowledge of atheism but he encourage muslim to learn knowledge of atheism.
in the end of the day both of u are still using Ibn Sina argument (necessary existence) and argument from mutakalimun (mutaqaddimin & mutakhiriin) to prove god existence nothing new. god existence can be proven via logic but who’s god cannot be proven through logic. we will only know who is he from wahyu.
I love malaysia
Berat juga topik ni... falsafah ni saya memang tak reti sgt
Lebih kepada istilah Dan kaedah Kalam Dan mantiq, bukannya falsafah
.
قال حجة الإسلام الغزالي رحمه الله تعالى: فعلمت أن ردّ المذهب قبل فهمه والاطلاع على كنهه رميٌ في عماية - المنقذ من الضلال
Beginilah sdr Haziq, saya rasa ini respon terakhir saya dkt sdr sebabnya sdr kelihatan tak faham, tak mahu faham tetapi tetap mahu menghukum dan melakukan natijah. Banyak sangat salah faham dan luzum ma la yalzam dekat tulisan sdr ni, sampai ada orang tuduh kami menidakkan Surah al-‘Asr (tuduhan berat ni sbb dakwa kami nafi al-Quran).
Sdr, maksud tak wujud tu ialah wujud khariji, ada fizik (nisbah makhluk) di alam kharij. Dia hanya abstraksi minda terhasil daripada kita bandingkan antara dua perkara yang berubah. Misalnya, waktu saya solat Zohor ialah ketika tergelincir matahari. Jadinya, kefahaman kita mengenai kesejajaran berlaku antara perbuatan saya solat dan peristiwa tergelincirnya matahari itulah masa. Sebab tu kita kata dia i’tibari. Dakwaan kata Imam al-Razi pegang ia jawhar, maka datangkan lah sumber dan konteks ucapan Imam al-Razi. Memang ada failasuf pegang masa tu jawhar, kalau ikut pandangan tu, maka ia wujud khariji la. Kami tak pegang pun pendapat tu.
Kemudiannya situasi kereta tu, lagi la saya tak nampak apa yang sdr nak buktikan sebenarnya. Cuba bawak ucapan ucapan aimmah kalam, at least tokoh falsafah masha’i berkenaan masa kaitkan dengan iman bagai tu secara penuh. Main petik out of context, expect saya nak jawab apa. Prinsip saya, saya takkan jawab nukilan, pendapat sesuatu kelompok ataupun tokoh melainkan saya dah tahu konteksnya.
Paling saya rasa janggal, kesimpulan akhir saudara yang katakan dalil huduth ni circular dan self destructive. Kesimpulan itu hanya timbul disebabkan saudara memilih untuk mengkritik terlebih dahulu sebelum faham satu per satu setiap istilah yang digunakan melalui sumber primer dan pengajian yang bermanhaj. Maksud i’tibari pun saudara tak faham, lazim malzum pun saya dapati saudara tak faham. Nak saya leraikan bagaimana terutamanya di ruangan yang terhad begini. Belajar lah dahulu kitab kalam, hikmah dan mantik step by step daripada ahlinya kemudian barulah kritik setelah faham. Jangan main petik dalam keadaan kefahaman masih celaru. Minta maaf cakap, kami yang belajar kalam memang nampak sangat jelas kecelaruan dan kesalahfaham sdr terutamanya istilah istilah asasi yang kami guna.
Akhir sekali, andai kata kekasaran kata, saya mohon maaf kepada saudara. Pegang lah nasihat Imam al-Ghazali yang saya nukilkan tu.
“Mengkritik sesuatu mazhab sebelum faham hakikatnya hanyalah panahan dalam kesesatan. “
komen asal saya ambil dari pemilik akauan Facebook سيف الصديقي....
Harap korang semua ikuti perbahasan/komen kat facebook.
_"We need to make science the language of Islam."_
Why? Well, the answer is easy, isn't it? You _start_ with Islam, since most of you were just taught to believe it as a child, and now you're just trying to find a way to justify what you already believe and really, really want to _keep_ believing.
But that's not a reliable path to the truth. It's just a reliable path to wishful-thinking. If you care about the truth, you should apportion your beliefs to the evidence. You shouldn't try to make the evidence seem to fit whatever you _want_ to be true.
_"I found that we have the best argument"_
Yes, I hear a similar claim from Christians and Jews, as well. Everyone seems to think that _they_ have the "best argument." And nearly all of the time, that argument just seems to back up whichever religion they were taught to believe as a child.
But I want evidence. I want good evidence that your claims are actually _true._ That's because evidence is how we distinguish reality from delusion and wishful-thinking. So, how about *one piece of good evidence,* specific enough and in enough detail that I can judge it for myself, that your god is real, rather than just imaginary? Do you have *anything* distinguishable from wishful-thinking backing up your religious beliefs?
_"You can't take a philosopher and sanctify him, because that's the end of philosophy. You always have to be able to critique him, to disagree with him."_
You know, that's pretty funny coming from Muslims, given how there is no freedom of speech or freedom of religion in majority Muslim countries, and that Muslims _murder_ people for 'blasphemy.'
_"The reason why we don't have this atmosphere..."_
OK, I retract my previous comment. Clearly, _you_ recognize the problem. I must give you credit for that. But it is still a huge problem in Islamic cultures - probably the biggest. If you have to _murder_ people who disagree with you, you must have nothing backing up your beliefs but wishful-thinking.
_"You have a central goal which is to prove that God exists."_
Again, that's the problem. Your goal is just to get to the conclusion you've decided on ahead of time (again, almost always because that's what you were taught to believe as a child). But that should *not* be your goal. Your goal should be the _truth._
You're choosing your conclusion _first,_ and then just trying to find a way to justify it. Again, that's not a reliable path to the truth. It's just a reliable path to wishful-thinking.
_"the Kalam Cosmological Argument"_
I'd say there are lots of problems with the Kalam Cosmological Argument, including (for theists) the fact that "God" isn't even mentioned in the argument! But I'm not sure I want to get into all of that. After all, this comment is too long already, and I'm hoping to hear what Kalam 3.0 might be.
But, again, the biggest problem with arguments like this is that you're _starting_ with your desired conclusion. You're not trying to discover the truth. You _start_ with what you think is the truth (which is almost always whatever religion and whatever god or gods you were taught to believe as a child), and now you just try to find a reason to convince other people of that.
_"That can't be right. That can't be right."_
Funny, isn't it? When scientists hear that they're wrong, they look at the evidence and change their mind. When Muslims hear that they're wrong, they just threaten to murder anyone who dares to say so.
_"But it's not original, it's not new, and it's not Islamic."_
Why does _any_ of that matter? What _should_ matter is whether or not it's true. But, of course, that's not the most important thing in Islam, is it? The most important thing in Islam is that it's what you already believe. Anything else is "blasphemy." Unfortunately, as far as I can tell, the truth hardly seems to matter at all.
OK, I ran out of time here, so I had to skim through the past ten minutes or so pretty quickly. But if you ever got to what the Kalam 3.0 actually _is,_ I missed it. And it's hard to comment on something when I don't even know what you're talking about.
❤
@user-qc1uk7cf8b
How about people who leave Islam in adulthood, despite the risk of being murdered for 'apostasy'?
Sure, converts exist - in _every_ direction. Christians are always bragging about the Muslims they've converted to Christianity. Muslims are always bragging about the Christians they've converted to Islam. People are individuals, after all. But in all cases, it's a small minority. The vast majority of Christians and Muslims alike were simply born into that religion.
And in majority Muslim countries with no freedom of speech or freedom of religion, it can be hard to even hear contrary views (and you might not want to admit holding them when you can be arrested or even murdered for that).
Look, this doesn't mean Islam _isn't_ true, necessarily. So, if you've _got_ something distinguishable from wishful-thinking, let's hear it. As I asked above - and no one has even _tried_ to reply to - how about *one piece of good evidence, specific enough and in enough detail that I can judge it for myself,* that your god is real, rather than just imaginary?
Evidence is how we distinguish reality from delusion and wishful-thinking. So why is *one* specific example too much to ask?
@user-qc1uk7cf8b
I replied to you, but it appears that my reply was removed. Sorry. I guess we'll have to give up on this thread.
Harap Abang jemput juga ahli falsafah.
ralat btoi cakap omputeh..lasong xjadi layan
Tapi saya suka dengar
Macam la kau pandai speaking
kelemahan sendiri
skill issue
itula pasaiii..kecik² mak aku hntar p skolah..aku lari p isam gam😂
mengarut. sembang syok sendiri. fakta pun banyak salah. kalau berani debat dengan ateist la.
Ko ni dri facebook sampai youtube ada ko cuba buat video bagi fakta pulak aku nk tgok dasar liberal..
Sila hadam apa yang Allah firmankan
Az-Zumar 39:18
ٱلَّذِينَ يَسۡتَمِعُونَ ٱلۡقَوۡلَ فَيَتَّبِعُونَ أَحۡسَنَهُۥٓۚ أُوْلَٰٓئِكَ ٱلَّذِينَ هَدَىٰهُمُ ٱللَّهُۖ وَأُوْلَٰٓئِكَ هُمۡ أُوْلُواْ ٱلۡأَلۡبَٰبِ
English - Dr. Mustafa Khattab, the Clear Quran
those who listen to what is said and follow the best of it.[[ This verse can apply to anything that a person listens to, and it can also apply specifically to the Quran-meaning, for example, those who read verses about retaliation and other verses about forgiveness, then they opt for forgiveness. ]] These are the ones ˹rightly˺ guided by Allah, and these are ˹truly˺ the people of reason.
Malay - Abdullah Muhammad Basmeih
Yang berusaha mendengar perkataan-perkataan yang sampai kepadanya lalu mereka memilih dan menurut akan yang sebaik-baiknya (pada segi hukum ugama); mereka itulah orang-orang yang diberi hidayah petunjuk oleh Allah dan mereka itulah orang-orang yang berakal sempurna.
English - Sahih International
Who listen to speech and follow the best of it. Those are the ones Allāh has guided, and those are people of understanding.
English - Rowwad Translation Center
those who listen to what is said and follow the best of it. They are the ones whom Allah has guided, and they are the people of understanding.
Get Quran App: gtaf.org/apps/quran
#GreentechApps
fakta mana yg salah?
Bentangkan fakta mana yang salah tu?
Fakta mana yang salah? Berapa banyak yang salah? Apa yang syok sendiri?
*Science* is its _hardware,_ *Islam* is its _software_ for the Universe to be known to us.
...yet _both_ belongs to *Allah* s.w.t., The _INFINITELY_ Almighty, The Creator of the Universe.