Easy to talk about all the things that went wrong for India, but worth mentioning a couple for Australia as well. Cam Green missing out on the series through injury. Would've been handy at 6 in place of Marsh (or even opening?) But the big one is Hazlewood going down in Brisbane. With a 3rd quick, I don't think India are avoiding the follow on, and then they're probably losing that game. Swings and roundabouts I suppose. Just stoked we won
Yeah man,can't get enough of so many people ridiculously pointing out what went wrong for india but many of them hardly analysing how the australian team had performed so well despite all the odds against them! They have definitely been a way better side than India (saying it as an indian) and clearly outclassed us in almost all aspects!
While I think Green was definitely a big out, I dont think we missed him as much as we missed an opener for the entire series, it was just a selection issue that we kept picking Marsh over Webster. For the first 3 tests McSweeny and Khawaja scored 135 @13.5 from 12 Innings. Its pretty tough to win games when you're effectively starting at 2/20 every game. Look at the scores: 8 UK 10 NM 0 NM 4 UK 13 UK 39 NM 10* NM 9* UK 21 UK 9 NM 4 NM 8 UK Going back to Green/Marsh/Webster, it looks pretty clear that Webster is a quality bat and handy 4th seamer. Just from the limited sample that we've seen, he looks more comfortable at test level with the bat than Green, who is still developing. Even when Green has scored test centuries, he plays and misses A LOT, which wasn't a feature of Webster's innings on a pretty hairy SCG wicket. I do believe that there will be room for Webster and Green in the same side, especially in the subcontinent. This would allow Australia to go into the match with only one genuine seamer and two spinners, then have Green and Webster share the load of the second seamer.
@@levipeterken4020Not being forced to bat twice in a row, which can happen if you’re batting second in a Test match and your team has scored over 200 runs fewer than the other team scored in their first innings. Instead of batting again to build a lead they might not need and wasting time in the match, the other team can make you bat again straightaway.
@@levipeterken4020 To avoid the "follow-on," the side batting second must not trail by more than 200 runs at the end of their innings. The follow-on is not mandatory. The captain who batted first is allowed to request the "follow-on." Sometimes, for tactical reasons, the captain will not "enforce the follow-on" but elect to bat and extend the lead. A famous match involving India and Australia occurred in 2001. It was the second test, played at Eden Gardens, India. The Aussies scored big in their first innings and bowled India out cheaply. The Australian Captain, Steve Waugh, asked India to bat again. However, through a massive partnership with Dravid and Laxman, India scored an enormous total. India ended up winning the game easily. I think you should look for a game highlight video. I'm an Aussie, but I loved India's incredible skill and determination to overcome one of the strongest Australian teams ever to play cricket and win under the most challenging circumstances. Truly breathtaking!!! Laxman and Dravid were Superman dressed in white.
I think the case in previous two series in Aus was that Cummins, Hazlewood, Starc, and Lyon all the test in the series and ran out off ammo at the backend of the series. The injury to Hazlewood was a blessing it brought Boland and Aus won all the tests that Boland played. I was also rooting for Jhye for the 5th test in place of Starc. Starc as usual bowled filth in the 2nd innings but thanks to Boland and Webster Aus weren't short of other seamers.
An important factor in most of these series has been tactical captaincy. Rahane was excellent in 20/21; Paine was unimaginative and had a tendency to panic and not consult senior players with more experience against India. Cummins is a poor captain of spinners; when Smith took over for Indore in 2023 he expertly managed a three spinner attack. In this series Rohit seemed remote and (apart from the usual brainless tactics against the tail in Brisbane which allowed India to avoid the follow-on) Cummins was pretty good.
People forget what a great impact both tim Paine and Justin Langer had for India in both the series. Also 2018 was the darkest toughest most miserable time for Australia cricket. Also It's really hard to win if your captain and coach both are playing for opposition 😅
@@ethancoster1324Currently Australia have won all the Test Bilateral Trophies, like they have retained them or they have won them. At this moment, right now, they are champions of all the Bilateral Test Trophies. How fascinating is that? Many of the people don't know about this fact, is only because right now we are seeing anti-Australia narrative nowadays. If India had achieved this same feat, everybody would be talking about it. This is not the only thing they have achieved. They are reigning world test champions. even Steve Waugh couldn't achieve this feat, because there was no world test championship back then. In fact, they are the number one ranked test nations by a mile, by a very very large margin. Difference between them and India is so large that it is even greater than the difference between India and 5th ranked team. This is really fascinating. Just think about it!! They have achieved everything in test cricket !!! They have won everything. There is nothing left in Test Cricket. They currently hold all the trophies. What's left? Champions Trophie?
In hindsight, IND would let AUS win a couple of those series for 1 of the WTC/WC. Jokes aside, this Indian core deserved a WTC if that's the new barometer but not to be. Pujara, Rahane, Ash are already done, Rohit, Virat & Jadeja may not be part of the next cycle.
I think the 2018 Boxing Day Test was also notable for having a terrible wicket. The ball was failing to carry through to the keeper in the first over of the match, but then started to break up after iirc, two days. The apex of a 'win the toss, win the match' pitch. People were keen to defend it, though, because the MCG had been (deservedly) rated poor the previous Summer for rolling out the absolute pancake that saved Cook's career and ended Jackson Bird's, and having the MCG lose its hosting rights was completely unthinkable.
I have a feeling next bgt in India if India can recover from this wtc cycle will be really interesting kind of like how Australians destroyed England after 2005 ashes. I would like to see a response from India next time
@de1623 Whenever boland played against india , they seem to win important moments in the match considering even wtc final. Starc simply failed to do that , he has some unplayable deliveries but that does not negate his bad bowling average to play him ahead of boland. Yeah Beau webster seemed on a different league compared to all other batters , his false shot percentage was really low
The australian batting lineup in 18/19 might be the worst batting line-up in Australian cricket history. Like the lineup at scg if you give them the flattest wicket they wouldn't get over 300
Bumrah hasnt bowled many bouncers on pacy Aus pitches.,in this series. Both Smith and Head not tested with bouncers by Bumrah enough. Maybe he wanted to preserve himself for 5 test series. Not even one Aus batter was hit on the hemet by Bumrah ,but he bowled a briliant length with enough seam movt ,to take wkts.
Until Bumrah has some support coming from the other bowlers to keep the pressure on in a game, India can’t expect more disappointments. India list to NZ and AUS.
Australia deserved to win this series - no questions there . Though if you look at 20/21 series, just as you could say Aus had a chance in that series, one could just as easily say India could've won that series 4-0. Ind won at MCG & Gabba. In adelaide they led after the first innings and a half decent second inning and Aus batters could've collapsed. As for drawn SCG test, 30 more minutes of Pant on that deck or Umpires call against Pujara and injurires to Vihari/Ashwin Ind was within winning distance. Same with 2018/9 wherein the only test Aus won in perth was on back of some rear guard tailend batting from Australia
But by the same token in the 20/21 series, if Pant hadn't faked his shoulder injury so India could get Saha to keep and Pant to bat, and if Sirja hadn't lied about racist crowd comments (causing play to stop and intupting Greens innings) Australia would have won those two matches.
I agree, that's what made it such a great series. It was on the line until the last innings. When pant started hitting them in that second innings I thought it would be perth all over again with me India setting a crazy total on a snakey wicket.
I think Rohit should have taken rest this series altogether. Forced inclusion of Rohit disturbed the winning combination and batting order. Also, Kohli seems to be having some major issues in his head.
Dumping Marsh and bringing in Webster won the game. Webster was the top scorer for the match(96) in his debut test. Boland should never be dropped too.
Currently Australia have won all the Test Bilateral Trophies, like they have retained them or they have won them. At this moment, right now, they are champions of all the Bilateral Test Trophies. How fascinating is that? Many of the people don't know about this fact, is only because right now we are seeing anti-Australia narrative nowadays. If India had achieved this same feat, everybody would be talking about it. This is not the only thing they have achieved. They are reigning world test champions. even Steve Waugh couldn't achieve this feat, because there was no world test championship back then. In fact, they are the number one ranked test nations by a mile, by a very very large margin. Difference between them and India is so large that it is even greater than the difference between India and 5th ranked team. This is really fascinating. Just think about it!! They have achieved everything in test cricket !!! They have won everything. There is nothing left in Test Cricket. They currently hold all the trophies. What's left? Champions Trophie?
They don’t hold all trophies what are you talking about 😂. Remember India won t20 wc and Pakistan holds champions trophy interesting to see if the Australian core completes their trophy collection because champions trophy is all that is left
The total we set was pretty low, but at that point the game was already a draw. Plus if the forecast wasn't so shocking Australia would have batted normally. Not just throwing away our wickets.
This is beneath you. Almost sounds like you don’t intend to acknowledge this Australian win and show respect. You indicate that it’s not Australia playing well it’s about India playing poorly. India are not and never will be ‘invincible’ and you know better.
Why so angry mate,chill down you guys have just won a series at home against an indian team having lost the previous four,kimber also said that australia had chances in india as well
When india won against australia at home in 2023 they didn't even celebrate properly,guess it means more to Australia winning at home not having beaten a team in 10 years
please. winning was not that difficult for australia. the whole test was held together by Bumrah, Jaiswal, and later on cameos from Reddy and Pant. Whereas Australian seamers have consistently bowled well and their top two batters scored a fuck ton of runs. marnus scores runs. their captain could bat down the order. I mean look winning at home is not that tough. That they couldn't whitewash India, or go 4-1 or in fact almost gave it away 2-2, is the real fucking deal. Its a win. but nothing that was dominant, as they should have been, because this is literally the weakest Indian team to have ever toured Australia in recent times.
Mate, India were so lucky that they lost only 3-1! If there were 50 more overs possible at Brisbane, Australia would have won. And let's not forget how Hazlewood could only bowl 1 over there.. Australia should have won 4-1. That would have been a fairer score-line.
Coulda woulda shoulda..... Hazelwood logic applies to absence of Bumrah as well.... and how about the last match which could've been a draw? 🤣... You've won this time, enjoy it while it lasts. Don't be a cry baby.
Easy to talk about all the things that went wrong for India, but worth mentioning a couple for Australia as well.
Cam Green missing out on the series through injury. Would've been handy at 6 in place of Marsh (or even opening?)
But the big one is Hazlewood going down in Brisbane. With a 3rd quick, I don't think India are avoiding the follow on, and then they're probably losing that game.
Swings and roundabouts I suppose. Just stoked we won
Yeah man,can't get enough of so many people ridiculously pointing out what went wrong for india but many of them hardly analysing how the australian team had performed so well despite all the odds against them!
They have definitely been a way better side than India (saying it as an indian) and clearly outclassed us in almost all aspects!
While I think Green was definitely a big out, I dont think we missed him as much as we missed an opener for the entire series, it was just a selection issue that we kept picking Marsh over Webster.
For the first 3 tests McSweeny and Khawaja scored 135 @13.5 from 12 Innings. Its pretty tough to win games when you're effectively starting at 2/20 every game.
Look at the scores:
8 UK
10 NM
0 NM
4 UK
13 UK
39 NM
10* NM
9* UK
21 UK
9 NM
4 NM
8 UK
Going back to Green/Marsh/Webster, it looks pretty clear that Webster is a quality bat and handy 4th seamer. Just from the limited sample that we've seen, he looks more comfortable at test level with the bat than Green, who is still developing. Even when Green has scored test centuries, he plays and misses A LOT, which wasn't a feature of Webster's innings on a pretty hairy SCG wicket. I do believe that there will be room for Webster and Green in the same side, especially in the subcontinent.
This would allow Australia to go into the match with only one genuine seamer and two spinners, then have Green and Webster share the load of the second seamer.
What does avoiding a follow on mean? New to cricket
@@levipeterken4020Not being forced to bat twice in a row, which can happen if you’re batting second in a Test match and your team has scored over 200 runs fewer than the other team scored in their first innings. Instead of batting again to build a lead they might not need and wasting time in the match, the other team can make you bat again straightaway.
@@levipeterken4020 To avoid the "follow-on," the side batting second must not trail by more than 200 runs at the end of their innings. The follow-on is not mandatory. The captain who batted first is allowed to request the "follow-on." Sometimes, for tactical reasons, the captain will not "enforce the follow-on" but elect to bat and extend the lead.
A famous match involving India and Australia occurred in 2001. It was the second test, played at Eden Gardens, India. The Aussies scored big in their first innings and bowled India out cheaply. The Australian Captain, Steve Waugh, asked India to bat again. However, through a massive partnership with Dravid and Laxman, India scored an enormous total. India ended up winning the game easily. I think you should look for a game highlight video. I'm an Aussie, but I loved India's incredible skill and determination to overcome one of the strongest Australian teams ever to play cricket and win under the most challenging circumstances. Truly breathtaking!!! Laxman and Dravid were Superman dressed in white.
They need to get you into the commentary box
Jarrod, Simon Taufel and Peter Lalor would be a great trio.
He is on TalkSport
Virat was there, more than in spirit than runs. So succinctly put.
I think the case in previous two series in Aus was that Cummins, Hazlewood, Starc, and Lyon all the test in the series and ran out off ammo at the backend of the series. The injury to Hazlewood was a blessing it brought Boland and Aus won all the tests that Boland played. I was also rooting for Jhye for the 5th test in place of Starc. Starc as usual bowled filth in the 2nd innings but thanks to Boland and Webster Aus weren't short of other seamers.
I love this bloke’s analysis!
Purist as the Test!
An important factor in most of these series has been tactical captaincy. Rahane was excellent in 20/21; Paine was unimaginative and had a tendency to panic and not consult senior players with more experience against India. Cummins is a poor captain of spinners; when Smith took over for Indore in 2023 he expertly managed a three spinner attack. In this series Rohit seemed remote and (apart from the usual brainless tactics against the tail in Brisbane which allowed India to avoid the follow-on) Cummins was pretty good.
People forget what a great impact both tim Paine and Justin Langer had for India in both the series. Also 2018 was the darkest toughest most miserable time for Australia cricket. Also It's really hard to win if your captain and coach both are playing for opposition 😅
This Australia Team is Trophies winning Machine 🥵🔥🔥
So when is England defeating india in india and Australia in Australia? 2011 is 14 years ago now
@@techgeek7410 Maybe Ashes in November Since Starc and Boland would have lost their Rhythm
I would pay to watch him to have him in the commentary box.
Suggestion : I like the videos more with old archive images. haha
Tim Paine's captaincy and keeping had a significant contribution for India in 2020/21 🤭😝
Cummins has all the infinity stones now. He is INEVITABLE 🤌🏻
No champions trophy
@@ethancoster1324 ooh you've tempted him now
As a captain or as a player?
@@ethancoster1324Currently Australia have won all the Test Bilateral Trophies, like they have retained them or they have won them. At this moment, right now, they are champions of all the Bilateral Test Trophies. How fascinating is that? Many of the people don't know about this fact, is only because right now we are seeing anti-Australia narrative nowadays. If India had achieved this same feat, everybody would be talking about it. This is not the only thing they have achieved. They are reigning world test champions. even Steve Waugh couldn't achieve this feat, because there was no world test championship back then. In fact, they are the number one ranked test nations by a mile, by a very very large margin. Difference between them and India is so large that it is even greater than the difference between India and 5th ranked team. This is really fascinating. Just think about it!! They have achieved everything in test cricket !!! They have won everything. There is nothing left in Test Cricket. They currently hold all the trophies. What's left? Champions Trophie?
@@PankajKumar6493both
Its the pitch which won , Bowling attack was the biggest difference between 2 teams.👍🏽
In hindsight, IND would let AUS win a couple of those series for 1 of the WTC/WC.
Jokes aside, this Indian core deserved a WTC if that's the new barometer but not to be.
Pujara, Rahane, Ash are already done, Rohit, Virat & Jadeja may not be part of the next cycle.
I think the 2018 Boxing Day Test was also notable for having a terrible wicket. The ball was failing to carry through to the keeper in the first over of the match, but then started to break up after iirc, two days. The apex of a 'win the toss, win the match' pitch. People were keen to defend it, though, because the MCG had been (deservedly) rated poor the previous Summer for rolling out the absolute pancake that saved Cook's career and ended Jackson Bird's, and having the MCG lose its hosting rights was completely unthinkable.
I have a feeling next bgt in India if India can recover from this wtc cycle will be really interesting kind of like how Australians destroyed England after 2005 ashes. I would like to see a response from India next time
Boland was the differentiating factor
I'd add Webster replacing Marsh was also a huge factor. He was top scorer over the test(96 runs).
@de1623 Whenever boland played against india , they seem to win important moments in the match considering even wtc final. Starc simply failed to do that , he has some unplayable deliveries but that does not negate his bad bowling average to play him ahead of boland. Yeah Beau webster seemed on a different league compared to all other batters , his false shot percentage was really low
The Pink ball test is a nice cheat code for Australia to add a free win into the mix
The australian batting lineup in 18/19 might be the worst batting line-up in Australian cricket history. Like the lineup at scg if you give them the flattest wicket they wouldn't get over 300
Bumrah hasnt bowled many bouncers on pacy Aus pitches.,in this series.
Both Smith and Head not tested with bouncers by Bumrah enough.
Maybe he wanted to preserve himself for 5 test series.
Not even one Aus batter was hit on the hemet by Bumrah ,but he bowled a briliant length with enough seam movt ,to take wkts.
Until Bumrah has some support coming from the other bowlers to keep the pressure on in a game, India can’t expect more disappointments. India list to NZ and AUS.
Why bowl bouncers when you can bowl the batsmen out? Bumrah has mostly relied on skill and some pretty sporting wickets. That's intimidating enough.
Australia deserved to win this series - no questions there . Though if you look at 20/21 series, just as you could say Aus had a chance in that series, one could just as easily say India could've won that series 4-0. Ind won at MCG & Gabba. In adelaide they led after the first innings and a half decent second inning and Aus batters could've collapsed. As for drawn SCG test, 30 more minutes of Pant on that deck or Umpires call against Pujara and injurires to Vihari/Ashwin Ind was within winning distance.
Same with 2018/9 wherein the only test Aus won in perth was on back of some rear guard tailend batting from Australia
But by the same token in the 20/21 series, if Pant hadn't faked his shoulder injury so India could get Saha to keep and Pant to bat, and if Sirja hadn't lied about racist crowd comments (causing play to stop and intupting Greens innings) Australia would have won those two matches.
@ hahaha, the racist bay 13 crowds should’ve known better! Completely agree with you there, Smart move by Pant.
@@cideway You mean Shiraz
I agree, that's what made it such a great series. It was on the line until the last innings. When pant started hitting them in that second innings I thought it would be perth all over again with me India setting a crazy total on a snakey wicket.
Jarrod the GOAT 🐐❤
I think Rohit should have taken rest this series altogether.
Forced inclusion of Rohit disturbed the winning combination and batting order.
Also, Kohli seems to be having some major issues in his head.
Feels good man
Pat Cummins is a great leader of men.
Dumping Marsh and bringing in Webster won the game. Webster was the top scorer for the match(96) in his debut test. Boland should never be dropped too.
I think pant s the highest right 60 and 40
@@srinivasaraopendyala3973 You're right, but Webster was only dismissed once .....
Currently Australia have won all the Test Bilateral Trophies, like they have retained them or they have won them. At this moment, right now, they are champions of all the Bilateral Test Trophies. How fascinating is that? Many of the people don't know about this fact, is only because right now we are seeing anti-Australia narrative nowadays. If India had achieved this same feat, everybody would be talking about it. This is not the only thing they have achieved. They are reigning world test champions. even Steve Waugh couldn't achieve this feat, because there was no world test championship back then. In fact, they are the number one ranked test nations by a mile, by a very very large margin. Difference between them and India is so large that it is even greater than the difference between India and 5th ranked team. This is really fascinating. Just think about it!! They have achieved everything in test cricket !!! They have won everything. There is nothing left in Test Cricket. They currently hold all the trophies. What's left? Champions Trophie?
They don’t hold all trophies what are you talking about 😂. Remember India won t20 wc and Pakistan holds champions trophy interesting to see if the Australian core completes their trophy collection because champions trophy is all that is left
@sahilthe2009 I said test bilateral dumb ass
@sahilthe2009 I am taking about test bilaterals dumbass
Great video
"They lost 2 players due to building supplies" lol
whiteboard!
4 priministers, anywhere between 2 and 30 years
Petition to get you in the commentary box
How much does a Whiteboard cost in the UK? Can we sponsor one for Jarrod? 😇
Mr . Jarrod Timber , please enlighten me how India were going to win Gabba by barely avoiding the follow on .
270 is chaseable
@@sahilthe2009😂😂😂
@@farazalam5772 am I wrong?
The total we set was pretty low, but at that point the game was already a draw. Plus if the forecast wasn't so shocking Australia would have batted normally. Not just throwing away our wickets.
@@sahilthe2009 Sahil the 2020 listen to cupcake
Congratulations on the BGT. Can't believe it's been 10 years..what an epic series. One of the best I've ever seen.
From a NZ cricket fan.
Ahh won't call us a wanker or take a dig at us?
This is beneath you. Almost sounds like you don’t intend to acknowledge this Australian win and show respect. You indicate that it’s not Australia playing well it’s about India playing poorly.
India are not and never will be ‘invincible’ and you know better.
Kimber is an Indian shill. He knows who puts the bread on the table so cannot blame the man.
Kimber needs to feed his Indian followers...and suck up to the BCCI. He still hopes and dreams that he can get a gig with an IPL team..
Why so angry mate,chill down you guys have just won a series at home against an indian team having lost the previous four,kimber also said that australia had chances in india as well
When india won against australia at home in 2023 they didn't even celebrate properly,guess it means more to Australia winning at home not having beaten a team in 10 years
@@Sid-e5y Why are you whining mate? You Indian randis' would have been dancing nanga in the street if you had even drawn this series.
Was waiting for the white board review. Great stuff Kimber, you the only analyst who talks about the wobble ball and actual match facts.
It's so funny watching your video after the Perth loss
please. winning was not that difficult for australia. the whole test was held together by Bumrah, Jaiswal, and later on cameos from Reddy and Pant. Whereas Australian seamers have consistently bowled well and their top two batters scored a fuck ton of runs. marnus scores runs. their captain could bat down the order. I mean look winning at home is not that tough. That they couldn't whitewash India, or go 4-1 or in fact almost gave it away 2-2, is the real fucking deal. Its a win. but nothing that was dominant, as they should have been, because this is literally the weakest Indian team to have ever toured Australia in recent times.
Indians “We’re the best in the world we’re going to crush you!!!!” Also Indians “pfft that win was nothing that was our weakest team ever” 😂
The thing that summarise how close this series was India celebrating avoiding the follow on at the Gabba. It was never close.
Mate, India were so lucky that they lost only 3-1! If there were 50 more overs possible at Brisbane, Australia would have won.
And let's not forget how Hazlewood could only bowl 1 over there..
Australia should have won 4-1. That would have been a fairer score-line.
Coulda woulda shoulda..... Hazelwood logic applies to absence of Bumrah as well.... and how about the last match which could've been a draw? 🤣... You've won this time, enjoy it while it lasts. Don't be a cry baby.
@PankajKumar6493 no it doesn't 😂😂😂we've won too muchv😂😂
@@farazalam5772 "We"? Sure buddy.. Pakistani
@@PankajKumar6493 why do u assume everyone goes for pakistan 😂😂😂 shut up Panaj dog
@@PankajKumar6493 Tum to brisane mein follow-on avoid karke randi ki tarah naach rahe the...