VIRAL MOMENT: John Kennedy Repeatedly Asks Mayorkas To Define 'Assault Weapons'-DHS Sec Can't
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 มี.ค. 2023
- At yesterday's Senate Appropriations Committee hearing, Sen. John Kennedy (R-FL) questioned DHS Sec. Alejandro Mayorkas about assault weapons.
Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:
account.forbes.com/membership...
Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: / forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: / forbes
More From Forbes: forbes.com
![ความรักของยักษ์เขียว (ทศกัณฐ์) - เดี่ยว ไออุ่น [OFFICIAL MUSICVIDEO 4K]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/yCCy-QVHqK8/mqdefault.jpg)
He cannot answer the question. He is ignorant. Thank you, Senator Kennedy.
Not just ignorant but arrogant as hell too
Mayorkas is not ignorant, he is very deceitful.
@@larrycassidy7274 Beat me to it. He knows exactly what he's doing/not doing and saying/not saying.
He's not ignorant - he's doing it on purpose!
@larry cassidy that is Truth! Thank you for the correction.
The arrogance of Mayorkas is amazing
The arrogance of this whole administration, FROM BIDEN ALL THE WAY DOWN THE LINE, THEY ARE DESTROYING THIS COUNTRY
Would love to just slap him!
How is Mayorkas being arrogant. Mass shooters use assault weapons that are legal, full auto, and available easily that should be banned? Stop supporting the gun murder lobby
He is but a mere tool in the Left's puppet theater.
its a gd jew
he knows what he's doing. he's purposefully avoiding defining the type of weapon he wants to ban so that ANY weapon can be banned.
Living that dream in Canada currently.
Trying to ban something he can't explain in simple words is mind blowing to me. It's really sad that we have high ranking nutt cases running our government.
You can not make bad guys harmless by making good guys helpless.
You hit the nail on the head. That should be on a shirt.
Especially when the bad guys are government officials!
You're not in kindergarten you need to learn to use Assailant and Defendent, or else these people will not take you seriously and will proceed to try and tell you what you cant do and what you cant own. Language goes a long way.
Spot on!
The mongols would only slaughter the populations of the cities that resisted them. Sometimes all you have to do is be willing to allow them to take everything they want from you, including your “women folk” and pay a reasonable tribute every year:
Senator Kennedy has a way with words and method of questioning.
I want to learn his methodology in questioning hostiles, (I have Dem family member holdouts) and I have family with a bit of grip of meth and alcohol related issues that need to be addressed (effectively= ASAP) I need my family back, not selling everything out from under me as soon as ex walks out on me! They were raised as preachers kids, they know better! God help me as you see me tearfully type this. I'm not going to complain, just allow me one last house for the holidays and summer vacations, to create good, hopeful, healing memories. Your 2nd coming is closer now than ever....! Help me prepare my families prepare others, In Jesus Name, Aman:
It's a very inoffensive way of questioning. He comes across a bit bumbling and seems clearly interested in what you're doing, a bit like a grandpa curiously asking how a cellphone works... I'm frankly reminded of the old detective show Columbo.
Asinine badgering questioning.
I believe I answered to the best of my ability.
There has been enough killing of innocent children, shoppers, temple patrons ...
@@AsheramK
Yes, he does come across as being unthreatening, however, quite effective , and always entertaining to watch.
He'd be an awesome father and grandfather. The people he mentally touches must have continuous growth and aspiration to think smartly and deliberately. His quips and metaphors add levity that reminds us that we can all be critical yet humble.
Mayorkas: I’m not an expert. In fact, I’m what one might call “incompetent”.
Well, he was appointed to an unnecessary post by an incompetent. So, there's that too
Amen
Seriously, how has this guy made it this far in life?!
Probably giving under the table favors to his handlers.
people think voting and government are good
@@nbroachful oh I get you. Mouth stuff.
He blew the right guys
He's a member of a tribe that controls the vast majority of the world's banks and governments
That’s the Biden administration in a nutshell
They fillibustered their way through life until their opponents all died of old age and they stepped in.
This attritious administration cant solve anything, they can only buy time and allow the bureaucratic cancer to spread while they use 3 letter agencies to police us.
If we dont respond with strength now, we lose.
I think the biden regime is just nuts shell or not😂😂😂
Mayorkas has an IQ = to an avocado pit.....
Mayorkas is absolutely weak and incoherent, incompetent and very guilty of leaving our borders wide open.
Slap a pair of silicone bolt-ons and some goat horns & we got ourselves an ole fashion Baphomet, people!
It's extremely bothersome that someone who can't or won't explain himself has been given authority to govern the people of this great nation
Your statement also explains the person in the WHITEHOUSE and the VP.
You mean like the supreme court justice who can't define woman?
@@g.brooks5866 the left have a hard time describing anything because it's all a bunch of catch phrases they parrot constantly
He is intentionally doing this. It's a way to waste the time of a senator on the mic.
This is what the left has become. Their beliefs are religious in nature and therefore impossible to logically defend
"I want to ban something but cannot articulate the thing I want to ban, I just know it is bad." Gee, such careful thought given to making decisions about civilians' rights.
The fact that our defense secretary isn't considered an expert is appalling
Nobody in this clown admin is an"expert" on anything. Except maybe "wokeness"
in his defense, he's not the defense secretary, secretary austin is.
When someone doesn't answer questions, something is wrong, and Mayorkas very rarely answers a question...yet, he's in a position of leadership 🤨
Yes you're right......what an insane, infuriating situation America currently finds itself in.
Tick tock......
Strange days for sure and God's DEFINITELY watching...... and waiting.
PEACE.
🙃
Good point.
Because he's a Talmud-Reading communist----they are evil.
Also, I NEVER trust bald guys.......never.
He's not the only one. Pretty much every senior official in Biden's administration does the same thing. They just refuse to answer with anything but talking points
I feel so secure in my homeland knowing that the Secretary of Homeland security can't define something that he wants to ban.
It's not that he can't it's that he refuses to in public. Webster's changed the definition after parkland to fit the gun control agenda. He could go with that, but he doesn't want to say the quiet part out loud on record. They absolutely want to ban everything. They just want and I would argue desperately need to go after anything that gives the people even relative parity to the state. It is also a class of firearm that increases the number of individual gun owners and they can't stand that either. Even in it's heavily infringed state the current remaining 2nd amendment is the absolute bane of the want to be totalitarian police state.
It scares the sh!t out of me.
I doubt he can define what a woman is, much less an assault weapon.
In 1930s Germany, the Department of Homeland Security was spelled GESTAPO... kinda telling for the current situation. Remember a propaganda term... is just that.
Next Mayorkas will be blaming the gun manufacturers for all the shootings
PERFECT example of *GROUP THINK* ..... _"if I like someone, and they say something, I will also say it, even if I have no clue what I'm talking about"._
The Secretary of Homeland Security still hasn't been able to ask any of his experts how they define an assault weapon? The incompetance of this administration is mind-blowing.
So he can't define, but wants to ban "them".
They want ALL THE GUN'S. It will never happen. Law abiding folk's will change over night into the people's militia and go after these Crimanals that have Betrayed all of us, men, women and children one to many times. Right now there are 400 million arms in gun case's, closet's, safes, around this continent harming no one. That can change in a moments notice as they are brought out of safe keeping to defend against the red tide. We are not stupid, to patient maybe but not Stupid.
Funny thing but you know what has never been included as an assault weapon, the M 1 carbine, used to assault the Japanese on many Islands.
sorta like - "we have to pass it to be able to see what is in it"
He wants to ban all guns starting with semi auto long guns .
@@nancyjanzen5676 Swords, Spears and Black Powder Muskets were all used in wars so are they also Weapons or War or Assault Weapons.
“We’ve seen enough tragedy” - Assuming an “assault weapons” ban would prevent tragedy from occurring by other means is just plain stupid.
Like the tragedy in the White House and the one that heads up the Dept of Homeland Security
the recent tragedy in TN resulted in the traditional IMMEDIATE Dimm/commie calls for an "assault weapons" ban when they were not used in the attack...they have done the same in recent past with pistol multiple shootings
Like the fake tragedy in tenn
Where the tranny shooter was wearing different shoes
Different cameo, different watch
That’s a tragedy…
Especially if the moron don’t see
A psyop being played out in front
Of them!
Ban knives..... ban rocks..... ban baseball bats.... they are all used to kill people...
Governments have murdered hundreds of millions more innocent people than trhannies with AR-15s, disgruntled employees, psychopaths in malls / schools/ gay nightclubs / gay parades / trhanny story time / gay sex clubs, etc.
It's not Gun Control we need to save lives.....it's Government Control we need in place to save lives------disarm government----track / trace / monitor ALL politicians / central bankers / CIA / NSA / FBI agents......we need that.
He can’t explain, but he is going to testify!! Wow
Corruption runs deep .. can't define it but it's gotta go . Can't describe it but it's gotta go.. we need to go back to our old ways of dealing with this problem
That's the problem right there. "When I consulted with my international partners",..... Did he forget he's suppose to work for the American people and THEY are the ones he should probably be consulting with?
I been saying this the whole time Nato and the CCP are behind these firearm infringements.... they know if they disarm us we can be controlled....
Right?! I instantly thought, "They are not US, they are not dealing with OUR situation!" (although, in my head, that had several choice words inserted, none of which I'd say in front of my 88 y/o mother)
So he has admitted to the people in front of the congress that he is influenced by leadership of other nations and not to the people that he is supposed to serve. In other words treason or violation of he oaths of office and to the people.
Thank you!
Excellent point. Everyone of these treasonous DNCultists swore an oath to serve and protect the Constitution of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NOT the One World Order.
Keep on him Mr Kennedy
Omg... How can you be opposed to something you can't describe?
I still don't understand how these people are allowed to answer questions like this. If you side step the questionyou lose your job.
It's very concerning that the Secretary of Homeland Security does not consider himself an "expert"
This is crazy like 😂😂😂😂😂
He's an expert at avoiding an answer
An expert is someone who refuses to learn more than his or her own biased opinion. I can't even call this person, 'highly knowledgeable.' An ignorant expert will increase their knowledge base. A stupid expert, however, cannot or will not.
Not one person that Biden appointed to key positions in his administration is an expert in the fields that they are overseeing. They are just "yes" men/women who will do the clown's bidding, and give him diversity creds.
If that was me at work today, I would have been fired,, TODAY .
There should be a mandatory competency test for anyone who wishes to pursue any government job or office position. Having leaders that are ignorant, willfully or otherwise, of what they are regulating and enforcing, should not be in their current position of power. It's dangerous and frightening.
If you can't define what it is that you want to ban, there's a serious problem.
We need more like Senator Kennedy. He's pure gold.
I find it unbelievable that the Secretary of Home Land Security has never consulted with someone under his employ that could explain to him what weapons are included in the things he opposes!!!
SK: "What is an assault weapon?"
Knucklehead: "I think we've seen enough tragedy."
Right, 'cause appeals to emotion are the only weapon they have at this point. Everytime one of these people are questioned with any level of specificity they invariably retreat into platitudes and shameless emotional manipulation. They've lost the argument but just havent seen the writing on the wall.
How can you want to ban something you can't define? This is clearly just hiding behind a tragedy and playing politics to infringe upon people's rights.
They want to keep it vague so they can change it as needed. If they define it then they are too limited in their ability to infringe upon our rights.
The Secretary is emotional, not logical....how can you want to ban something you CAN'T DEFINE ????
@Adantehand EXACTLY! I fully agree.
Truth is they want to ban all guns. Period.
Lol it's the Republicans playing politics. Don't be dumb.
Him squirming under pressure is just gold.
yep little weasels
I’ve been hoping someone would address how our govt officials don’t understand how guns work and therefore don’t know what they are talking about
Holding that party line, but can’t explain why 😂
Cannot answer the question? More like WILL not because they want the broadest possible definition. If they answer publicly and on record they would have been laughed off the floor!
iI
Security of our homeland is in the hands of this MAN who don't have knowledge about weapons
It's enough to understand how secure we are
i think you don't understand. he knows perfectly well. but if he answers with particularity then that answer is subject to attack. mayorkas is corrupt, not stupid.
Such an embarrassment he is.
Yeah I feel SO secure as an American, knowing we have an open border that criminals are violating with impunity.
Let's ban everything, but I have no sense or definition of everything. SMH
This is ridiculous. Thank you senator.
"I don't know what it is but it absolutely must be banned." - Mayorkas
Similar to all the other topics the left peddles.. "We can't define what a woman is, but men can be women. Men can have no opinion on women's rights though. And men are toxic." No logical consistency. Their talking points fall apart upon any line of questioning.
An..."Assault Fist"...would make it perfectly clear...
They should have a Senator sitting behind Mayorkas, smackin' him upside the head when he won't answer. 😂 He sounds like Dr Jekyll on that Bugs Bunny episode.
I tried to explain it to an ignorant friend as …. assault rifle is sort of the same as an assault fork when you try and steal my steak. Another example is all of the assault cars you have to walk in front of every time you cross the street.
If they can’t define “What is a woman?” How on earth can we expect Mr potato head to define an “assault weapon”
good stuff! I like how he asked do you know what a magazine is....Mayorkas...really trying to pull those heart strings
Senator, these are the words I was told to say.
Sen. Kennedy could have asked a follow-up question - "If you need to defer to the experts to define something, shouldn't you also defer your decision to ban it until after you have the knowledge to know what you are banning? You've put the cart before the horse." This sounds like Pelosi's "we need to pass it so we can know what's in it"
It's always hard to define things that you just make up. Unbelievable how hard he tries not to answer a single question.
That proves how ignorant he is, he wants to ban the weapons, while he cannot define the weapon style.
He is just a yes man for the ones who are trying to disarm the American people. This dude is shameful.
@@tashalorm4313 he's not ignorant, he's just dishonest, the goal is to leave the term vague and then at the last second include all semi-automatic rifles under the ban.
@@kurzabel I am sure he is dishonest. His level of dishonesty makes him look ignorant.
Discusting and a Clear and Present Danger to the US Constitution and the American people.
this is absolutely terrifying.
Never have I heard a man say so much without saying a damn thing
Wait, did he say other countries as in foreign powers are asking him why he hasn't influenced policy in the way they like? Sounds like he should be asked about a few more things than just guns.
You don't need foreign powers when Israel has made US its puppet by hijacking American politicians via American Jews, far right religious nuts and powerful politicians and businessmen. We want China, Russia, Iran and North Korea to adopt democracy and human rights but when current Isreali government is trying to destroy Isreali democracy and violating human rights for decades with Palestinians, our leaders don't even release statement due to fear of Isreali Lobby. Same with UK when they suppress Northern Irish people, US is mum. Same when recently French president Macron bypassed parliament to impose a decree in clear democratic violation, US was mum. Same when Trump tried to destroy American democracy, GOP was and still is silent. Why then we preach world about US democratic and human rights values? It's clear. We try to destabilise our enemies by interfering in their domestic affairs while we remain silent when we or our allies destroy democratic values. US should accept that it's a normal nation pursuing its naked self-interests like all other nations do and any pretense to exercise global leadership on values and principles is just a cover to weaken and destabilise our adversaries. Infact, due to our post-Cold War disasters at home and abroad, world already doesn't believe in our fake value-based foreign policy and treats us just like normal selfish nations like China or Russia who relentlessly pursue their self-interests but don't pretend on values or ideologies. It's high time we recognise that and accept the hard but necessary truth that since WW2, first time US has neither comprehensive national power to defeat or outcompete its enemies, particularly China, nor US has vibrant domestic strength and societal cohesion to sustain its society and world hegemony. We have joined long but perennial list of world superpowers who first dominated the international system, then faltered and then failed. These silly hearings and our both parties and infact we Americans ourselves prove that Ronald Reagan's "shining city on hill" is long dead.
Oh you know, just the Rothschild family trying to disarm us as part of their plan to enslave humanity. No big deal.
He forgot to mention that those countries dont have the freedom of speech either. Might as well take that away too.
Shall not be infringed ! PERIOD!
The intent to to keep the definition ambiguous so that the category can be applied more broadly.
Thank you Mr. Kennedy we need more of you up there. If them nuts.
I think these hearings are always so pointless. If people don't have to answer questions why even get together and do all this?
I want to put a shock sensor on their seat. Any time they can't answer directly or start to filibuster - zap them.
Masturbation
It proves how these power hunger democrats are doing their best to hide what they are really trying to do.
They are applying sunlight. The American people see the lack of specificity.
They're all getting paid. If I could go to work, do nothing and get paid I'd be putting in 16 hours of overtime a day.
Who the F should be more of an “expert” than someone in his position?
Someone buried deep in a bureaucracy whom you've never heard of and never will.
...and this is the guy that leaves all important decisions of strategy and implementation of policy to "those on the ground!" He cannot locate his ass with both hands!
Biden put his friends in high positions that none of them are qualified for. Here's the result..chaos..
Oh. This guy has GOT to GO!
BTW. Glad to see Forbes Breaking News covering such news worthy events too. I might even subscribe at this rate.
These people never answer any questions! How are they allowed to do this? Insanity
My suggestion: Give Mayorkas 2 cards: YES and NO; he has to answer using one of them. This way, he can't filibuster and waste our time.
Excellent! ...and I wouldn't be so prone to kicking in the monitor while watching this buffoon!
Nah, he'd still try to filibuster his way out of questioning. He's a weasel.
Then give him an electric shock everytime he doesn't use " yes" or " no"!!!
Fantastic idea
There is an awesome congressman who is trying to expand the time these reprobates are questioned. Each senator only has five minutes each to question the wretched. The reason they babble is to eat up that time.
This man is something to watch,like a bulldog for the truth.May God bless him!!
Personally, I love to watch John Kennedy work.
This just like when he grilled Dave Chipman. It's hilarious and I freaking love senator Kennedy
"I think I've addressed your question to the best of my abilities."
If that's the best of his abilities, then he has no business being involved in legislation of any kind.
Questioning him is so pointless! He’s either that dumb or plays that dumb until the person asking questions gets exasperated or runs out of time!! 😡😡
Absolutely, there's nothing to be gained by questioning someone who deliberately will not answer straight questions.
Mayorkas needs to be impeached for breaking his oath of office, charged with treason (for not upholding his oath of office) and be deported to Cuba where he was born... 🙏🙏🙏🙏
His job is to deflect. As the rest of this administration.
Yep. That's called the Alejandro Tango on Capitol Hill!
He's not dumb. He's anti-American.
The same shmegegge over and over and over. When is enough ENOUGH?
"I need to feel better about myself so ban this thing Idk nothing about"
He knows! His handlers won’t allow him to answer these types of questions to risk incriminating the Biden Admin even more than they have already shown “We The People” that they are shitbags.
You’d think that they would be able to form a coherent answer after being asked the same assault weapons question so many times.
@@VarianteMobile To ban something you must have parameters, or you are banning everything. By saying "assault weapons" they mean any weapon that gets used to assault someone. Hammers, steak knives, automobiles. As the 2nd amendment is in regard to firearms, they must specify which firearms to get them banned. The "we must ban something" idiocy is a non-issue if you cannot state what must be banned. You may be impressed with their strategy but it will not serve them well when you must write the name of the show you think needs to be cancelled. We are not cancelling all of them to make sure we get the one that upset you. Those complaining must be clear about their complaint. Rules and distinction matter to us.
Even after all this time they havent got a single answer.
If we pinned them down to a very specific definition, then they could not easily expand that definition to include more.
@@lavern007 - exactly😊
They choose to not answer...period.
I've often heard Mayorkas described as a complete dmb-_ss, so I'm glad to see Senator Kennedy able to so clearly define what everyone means.
An assault weapon has full auto capability. That is, it will continue to fire with continuous pressure on the trigger until it runs out of ammunition. Assault weapons are currently banned in the civilian market except for those grandfathered in if owned before 1986.
I would faint if any of these people would come out with a straight answer.
Kennedy is awesome!
"We need to pass it first before we see what's in it."
These committees are a waste of time when you put time limits on question being asked, they go totally around the question when being asked just to run the time out and the end result is a waste of tax payers money. They ask simple questions that be answered with a yes or no answer and they still continue to go around the question just to run the clock down so they don't have to answer the question. These people need to be held accountable, especially Mayorkas and Fauchi.
Thank you for asking this question. It’s clear they don’t even understand what they want to ban
They want to ban *EVERYTHING* that is a threat to their lives and power hegemony. Public safety is nothing more than a convenient excuse. Gun control is not about them protecting the public, *it's about them protecting themselves FROM the public.* Because when things get really really *REALLY* bad, either by their incompetence or malfeasance, and your money is worthless and you haven't eaten in three days, you're going to want to kill them. Look at what happened in France over increasing the retirement age, that's why they *NEED* you disarmed.
Don’t think they don’t know what they want to ban. They want to ban everything. He doesn’t want to throw out a definition that could be questioned.
They know exactly what they want to ban. If he answered the question truthfully, he would have said all guns. But instead he wants to ban what the experts say, which will change over time.
They know, basically trying to go for all semi-auto rifles under the guise of "military style weapons", even though handguns cause the most gun deaths.
Yes they do. If it goes bang, they want to ban it.
He wants to ban something he can't define! Hands, feet, cookware, sticks, rocks, shovel, hammer, vehicle, furniture, etc are ALL assault weapons if used to assault someone
And strangely, most of the items you listed kill more Americans each year than rifles do. “Assault🤪” or otherwise! Yet this is what millions of our tax dollars are being spent on.
Surprised it took this long for someone to state the obvious. An assault weapons ban doesn't ban all assault weapons just the one they want. Kind f like their prosecutions against only the people they want. Thank You.
@TO INFINITY AND BEYOND Mann you can use an AR to hunt
@@toinfinityandbeyondmann8398 butt stock, trigger and barrel? You said define not describe
@@toinfinityandbeyondmann8398
I would probably say “Armalite rifle”. Then, when they don’t understand that and insist that an assault rifle is an actual thing that exists, I’d probably try (pointlessly) to educate them that it’s just a propaganda term like “undocumented worker” or “fluid gender”.
I could make a strong argument (backed by statistics) that a handgun is more dangerous than an AR-15. I could make a very strong case that a typical hunting rifle is more dangerous than an AR-15. And I could make a very strong case that the AR-15 is not a “military” weapon. Simply because, it isn’t. And that’s all without even getting into the guaranteed protections of the Constitution based on it being the most popular rifle platform in the country.
I can use it for defense. I can use it to hunt (though not that effective by comparison to other rifles/shotguns). And I can use it for sport shooting. That’s just off the top of my head. Sounds multi-purpose to me.🤷♂️
After that I'm convinced he could be looking directly at one and couldn't describe it!
They are careful not to define it so they can keep expanding the definition. They banned guns in england, now they have the most stabbings in the world. "You can fix a lot of things in this world, but you can't fix stupid" -Ron white
I never get tired of Rep. Kennedy making Mayorkas squirm.
What a COWARDLY way of dodging a direct question!!!
He has absolutely NO business sitting as the Sec. of Homeland Security!
Sad when these people that are in position to have major power have no clue to that which they are speaking. They deal only on emotions.
He has a clue. He just won't answer because he's told not to.
They know exactly what they are doing. They are attempting to take away the ability of the American citizen to defend themselves against their tyranny.
This man fills me with so much rage that I must go to church and to confession with the clergy!
Our government is a joke. How do so many of these unqualified individuals end up in these positions??! This is pathetic.
So he wants to ban something but doesn't know what and can't explain why? People like this should be restricted from holding any public office.
Imagine going to the dentist and asking him something about your teeth and he said I will have to defer to the experts and gave you no insight other than that.
Do you drink a lot of soda? "I will have to defer to the experts about that".
@@ed_geins_hobbyjol3k559 do you eat sour candy. Love it. ;-)
that would've made me snort with laughter if it weren't so sa
It’s so gross how many of these people can’t answer simple questions and comically show themselves to be the weasels they’re so often compared to.
I've come to testify, but PLEASE don't expect me to testify.
Imagine the arrogance. Ruling over something he has no idea about is scary.
Everything is “self evident” with these people.
They use shovels in the military, gonna ban them too?
Applause and thanks for Kennedy calling out Scummer as well.
Your well come thanks for that ...
This perfectly illustrates the futility of holding these types of public meetings.
Geez. How in THE world did this man get into the dept. of homeland security!? This is nepotism at it's finest.
I JUST CANNOT IMAGINE WHY WE KEEP ASKING THESE PEOPLE QUESTIONS, WHEN WE KNOW THEY WILL DO OR SAY ANYTHING TO AVOID GIVING A DIRECT ANSWER. THEY SHOULD BE STRIPPED OF THEIR APPOINTED POSITIONS.
Cause they are all in it ! It is a play they put on for the people like good cop , bad cop. Gives some of us a little hope that we are so close to winning just give it a little more time and good guys win . I used to have hope . Not any more , nothing will ever happen to the criminals in our Government . Both sides are guilty but they are dug in too deep . You think any of them would just give up their criminal ways and step down ?
@Glen Bennett It's just Political theatre. Follow the money to get answers to what is really going on in DC
@@toinfinityandbeyondmann8398 Maybe if you repeat stupid enough it will make sense. But still...
This is what you wrote, "Only an AR is made primarily for killing"...
That is stupid. If that's not clear, call a friend.
It's called running the clock with their jibber jabber so they don't have to answer as many questions, which obviously they have no answer to.
This guy is seriously under qualified to head anything more than a peanut stand.
I doubt very much if even Jimmy Carter would hire him to run a peanut stand!
He is an amazing yes man.
At 4:05 in the video, he said my international friends for asking him what is going on with the mass killings in America is his international friends the Chinese government? Is that all it takes is a couple of international friends to pressure someone in high government to disarm America. That is extremely scary, and also troubling that they don’t know that that could be other countries plans to disarm us.
forget your conspiracy theories for a minute and answer this:
why do American laws allow for such a high volume of mass shootings?
at the very logical core, to reduce these events, would either a ban on ALL guns be voted on to reduce as much as possible deaths (as it seems pro life is a tune that many like to sing but seldom apply it outside of birth related matters)
or
keep guns but severely regulate rate of fire and caliber.
if none of the above is addressed, nothing will change. and yeah, the states IS the laughing stock of the world, especially when it comes to double standards as meddling in foreign affaires when at home, citizens are killing each other.
well done 'merica.
Q: What do you consider an assault weapon?
A: I’m sad about these things like Nashville
If you can't define it and need to consult and "expert" then why isn't the "expert" here to answer the real questions
OMG, this guy is so frustrating to listen to! I've seen several videos now of him being questioned, and I don't think I've ever heard someone use so many words to say nothing. He is just incapable of giving a straight answer to anything.
_"Because it's scary lookin' to ya"_
OMG that's GOLD 🤣 😂 AK-47? Hasn't the manufacturing or importation of machine guns for civilians been banned since 1986?!
“Do you know what a magazine is” lmao
“I want to ban something I don’t have the requisite expertise to even know what it is”
A rock in bad hands killed Able, a rock in good hands killed Goliath, it’s not about the rock!
Good one.
Amen
WELL-DONE, SENATOR KENNEDY!!!