Seiko watch and an alternative at a quarter of its price!!!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 15

  • @JohnJohn-xu6gk
    @JohnJohn-xu6gk 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    That color is 🔥

  • @user-fy2vz3tu9x
    @user-fy2vz3tu9x 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Nice green emerald color

  • @tvventy0ne
    @tvventy0ne 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you for making the comparison side by side. Love your content. Will keep coming back for more. Cheers my guy! 😁👍🏻

    • @flashyjewelry
      @flashyjewelry  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Appreciate you checking out my content.

  • @mohammedfairoz5062
    @mohammedfairoz5062 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I bought the same colour as the Seiko 5 last month It's a very great watch. I am loving it😊

    • @flashyjewelry
      @flashyjewelry  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@mohammedfairoz5062 Gald you are enjoying your! Timepiece. Drive Forward

  • @CoreytJames
    @CoreytJames 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Beautiful watch

  • @mutawi3i
    @mutawi3i 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is a Fake

    • @flashyjewelry
      @flashyjewelry  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It’s a Cadisem it has its own branding

  • @cougarbatterie
    @cougarbatterie 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    One is a Chinese Aliexpress junk and the other is from a reputable japanese brand that has been making watches since 1881. Case closed. Don't buy junk!!!

    • @flashyjewelry
      @flashyjewelry  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@cougarbatterie I hear you but you have to understand not everyone is in a position to buy a watch north of $200. I choose to humble myself and would never call anyone’s watch that they worked for junk if that’s what they like.

    • @cougarbatterie
      @cougarbatterie 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@flashyjewelry Sorry buddy, but if a person has an internet connection and a mobile phone or pc to watch your video, he definitely has 200 or 300$ to spare and buy a decent entry level Seiko. Do not promote junk and don't even try to induce people by using the word "an alternative to a Seik", because it's NOT an alternative. You buy a Seiko not because it's rugged, well constructed, you buy it for its brand reputation just like the Moonswatch piece of junk plastic was sold for over 500$ just because Omega was stamped on it.

    • @flashyjewelry
      @flashyjewelry  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@cougarbatterie some people don’t care about heritage. I was informing people buy what they want: Also people can have access to internet on there phone does not mean they can spare $200 for a watch after there bills

    • @cougarbatterie
      @cougarbatterie 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@flashyjewelry OK, so now you're just being stupid by saying people don't care about heritage. Why in hell then did you mention the brand Seiko, if it's not on people's mind and it is a reference point in your review? Just promote the junk and don't mention Seiko. You just acknowledge a well known brand by saying this is an alternative!!! Secondly, someone that can pay at least a 400$ mobile phone and over 60$ of internet connection each month at home and on his mobile saying that this person cannot afford a 250$ watch is just plain dumb. Who are you kidding here! We're not talking 2000 here! And lastly, if you're a watch enthusiast, your responsibility is to direct people to brand and heritage and not sacrifice it for junk watches from China that you promote for an affiliate link. Over and out.

    • @flashyjewelry
      @flashyjewelry  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      First of all you don’t have to go as low as name calling be a man not a keyboard warrior. Check my channel I have never gave an affiliate code on any of my videos. I said some people don’t care about heritage and that’s a fact.