We have men for that now. (I'm being sarcastic) You make a great point, feminist are on the side of men who think they are women rather than biological women. Crazy
Literally tho. It's astounding how greatly the nonsense of postmodernism and Marxism deeply appeals to pseudo-intellectuals. They seem to be the most susceptible to these clearly illogical and untrue concepts. Like, it BOGGLES my mind how these women are talking with such authority on gender and yet nearly every other sentence they are contradicting themselves and confusing or conflating different concepts-- for example they keep misconstruing masculinity/femininity with gender/sex. One of them even said "in society we say things like 'this person is more manly or more womanly'" but that has ZILCH to do with sex/gender and EVERYTHING to do with personality and what is culturally considered masculine/feminine. Good grief.
Actually he would be deeply desperate that his doctrine led to NOTHING politically and economically efficient nowhere, but led to the most grotesque and insane nonsensical bullshit the whole mankind ever gave birth to and large human catastrophes until today.
EXACTLY!!! These libs drive me insane with how wrong they are. Yes, of course there are more masculine men or more feminine women-- because we have PERSONALITIES!! But that does not call into question if that person is literally a man or woman. Also, the 3rd gender in other cultures argument is SOOOOOO over-inflated. The concept is slightly mentioned in a few very rare cultural instances and even then it is not described in the way that these woke warriors want it to.
So since my cat acts more like a dog or even human sometimes he is now not a cat. He'll be so happy to find out, until he has to pay taxes that is. 😂 these women are crazy. Internet has let stupid people get online and think their smart.
Johnny Cash said it best"" going to church every Sunday doesn't make you religious, anymore than standing in a garage makes you a Chevy. That takes care of a lot of arguments
I actually COMPLETELY disagree with Charlie on the thought that men don’t reflect on conversations. That sounds ridiculous to me, because I always do it: we always think about what we can do BETTER, SOLVING PROBLEMS. So we solve the problems of the past by reflecting on what we said, so that we can approach it better in the future. I’m sorry, I don’t know how other men are, but I’ve reflected on loads of conversations over my lifetime to try to approach them better in the future. And I’m GLAD I did.
The narcissism and subjectivity is stunning.. Also, Pink was NEVER a "masculine color", Pink clothing was used as a status symbol - a color only the wealthy could afford - so that's why men (wealthy people in general) wore pink clothing... Now blue is INDEED a gendered color - it's been proven that boys are more attracted to blue than any other color, so there is certainly science that backs up the association between colors and gender.
I really enjoyed where this debate went. One of my biggest concerns with this "Woke" way of thinking is, why is it a bad thing, for a man to display masculine characteristics? All of a sudden masculine has been turned into misogyny. As well as women's feminine traits are perceived as inferior or weak. I find that to be absurd. Women are strong when they can act with kindness and compassion in the face of adversity. While men can express their love by fighting for what they believe in, or by taking charge of a difficult situation. What is so wrong with that and why are these qualities all of a sudden viewed as bad or wrong? When we start allowing society to remove the mothers and fathers from the home (e.g., dad becomes soft and sensitive/mom becomes hard and non-nurturing) we will ultimately lose how and why humanity has managed to exist in the first place.
My husband thinks a lot about movies…who produced, who starred. And music! Where does it come from how does it relate….and when will we be intimate next! Oh, and what’s to eat?
I want Charlie to address the point that a transgender becoming a female does not have a uterus or eggs to get pregnant so how are these women believing men can get pregnant
"A lot of women can't get pregnant" but, they are of the nature to get pregnant. I hate that argument its so stupid and charlie and matt walsh have destroyed that view over and over already. Why can we dig someone up 100 years from now and know their sex? They can't answer that question and their argument dies there. Charlie did a great job here and I hope he got them to think critically about this issue.
My dog acts like a cat. So I call him a cat. Doesn’t mean he’s not a dog. He’s just less a stereotypical dog. He’s still a dog. Less or more just describes the stereotype, don’t change a binary.
I love Charlie Kirk, but he is wrong about men not replaying conversations. How would you remember anything? How would you be able to reference, comprehend and execute terms and conditions in business dealings? I don't think you can scientifically prove that. That is more unisex and dependent upon a personality and significance of the conversation to any one individual. A HUMAN MALE must be able to recall a conversation, analyze the effects and prepare for the outcome for survival.
There are societies in Polynesia that recognize feminine males and masculine females, but the sex isn't disputed. Fa'afafine and fa'afatama are fluid gender roles that move between male and female worlds. They perform roles in society and don't need to change from man to woman to perform these roles.
7:16 I have to disagree with Charlie. He said that no male sit there and think about conversations they have had. I am a 25-year-old biological male. I think the conversations that I have had to try to gain as much information that I can from them whether it was a friendly argument, big or small conversations is not true It may be his truth, but it’s not for all of us. If for anyone that wants to get argumentative with the statement, I am a fan of Charlie.
My dog acts like a cat. So I call him a cat. Doesn’t mean he’s not a dog. He’s just less a stereotypical dog. He’s still a dog. Less or more just fits the stereotype don’t change a binary.
Only humans have the capacity to confuse simple biolegy like this. Dogs dont have any problems knowing the difference. Horses cows and every other animal know this simple fact.
Charlie Kirk is totally wrong about men not going over conversations that they’ve had in the past. As a normal man , I can tell you that conversations that were pivotal in my life that I’ve gone in a negative way, I have often thought about how they could’ve gone better, how I could’ve made my point better.
I can’t think of where to begin to talk about how wrong Charlie Kirk is. He’s gotten almost everything wrong, I just don’t know where to begin with the amount of time I have today. He’s cherry picked his statistics, to fit his narrative, that just aren’t correct. Makes a few good points. But not many. He’s not the brightest bulb in the box.
I'm overall in agreement with Charlie, but I don't think men universally think about sports and sex for 30 minutes. I have little interest in either. I'd say that sure, statistically, men and women's brains are different. But while there are 2 sexes, personality does exist on a spectrum
Of course! And he even says that early on! He states that we have PERSONALITIES which explain variations. But he is speaking in generalities-- most men will think about sports or sex quite often. You and I may not, but most men will.
@@timkelly6985 the people that want to tell us what a woman is also want us to believe that a woman can get pregnant by a holy ghost.. If you guys say woman are xx chromosomes how is it possible a woman can get pregnant by a ghost? 👻
@garcia202 so this is what is known as a "red herring" fallacy in logic and argumentation. You are bringing up a whole new topic as a means of deflection and distraction since you do not have a way to successfully defend the current topic. But, to your question, you are asking about the metaphysical realm when the issues being discussed are of the physical realm. I suggest you read some academic literature and books. Stephen Hawkings has a great discussion about the metaphysical in one of his works. There is also a great book on Quantum physics and celestial mechanics that does a great section on metaphysical studies and theory. But, the short answer (of which there is a much longer one called "the bible") is that spiritual beings, in particular God, can move and work in different dimensions than humans whom are bound by the physical realm. And so, the Holy spirit (manifestation of God) can easily change, alter, create, destroy, or manipulate the physical realm. Creating life would be as easy as breathing, especially considering God created all life to begin with. Now, if you have an ACTUAL and relevant argument for what has been discussed in this video, I would love to hear it. Otherwise you are just being a typical woke troll with nothing to say.
![ประสบการณ์ จ้าง Developer ที่ผมจะไม่มีวันลืม [ภาค1]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/bzivN4KDg-k/mqdefault.jpg)
Women arguing to get rid of women. 🙄
We have men for that now. (I'm being sarcastic) You make a great point, feminist are on the side of men who think they are women rather than biological women. Crazy
Karl Marx would watch these women with his arms folded and slowly nod with a smirk of quiet satisfaction at his success in their indoctrination.
Literally tho. It's astounding how greatly the nonsense of postmodernism and Marxism deeply appeals to pseudo-intellectuals. They seem to be the most susceptible to these clearly illogical and untrue concepts. Like, it BOGGLES my mind how these women are talking with such authority on gender and yet nearly every other sentence they are contradicting themselves and confusing or conflating different concepts-- for example they keep misconstruing masculinity/femininity with gender/sex. One of them even said "in society we say things like 'this person is more manly or more womanly'" but that has ZILCH to do with sex/gender and EVERYTHING to do with personality and what is culturally considered masculine/feminine. Good grief.
Well said
Actually he would be deeply desperate that his doctrine led to NOTHING politically and economically efficient nowhere, but led to the most grotesque and insane nonsensical bullshit the whole mankind ever gave birth to and large human catastrophes until today.
There are definitely cats that act “less cat like” that doesn’t mean they aren’t a cat.
EXACTLY!!! These libs drive me insane with how wrong they are. Yes, of course there are more masculine men or more feminine women-- because we have PERSONALITIES!! But that does not call into question if that person is literally a man or woman.
Also, the 3rd gender in other cultures argument is SOOOOOO over-inflated. The concept is slightly mentioned in a few very rare cultural instances and even then it is not described in the way that these woke warriors want it to.
Real. My dog acts like a cat. Still a dog.
What has happened to this generation of women? Thank god I'm in my 70's and don't have to put up with their BS!
It's been a week you still alive big bro?
@@wamzy69 Sam here still kicking!
Its still called mentality disturbed
If they feel this way why do they believe they are a woman
So since my cat acts more like a dog or even human sometimes he is now not a cat. He'll be so happy to find out, until he has to pay taxes that is. 😂 these women are crazy. Internet has let stupid people get online and think their smart.
@@RickNyks I have to say it. It’s they’re not their lol sorry had to say it
Johnny Cash said it best"" going to church every Sunday doesn't make you religious, anymore than standing in a garage makes you a Chevy.
That takes care of a lot of arguments
I posted the same argument on another one of your videos, that if you dig up the skeleton, you will know either Man or woman.
Thank you for part 2!
Brian may be a woman at heart
It's a very good topic what is a woman, but how come they can't answer the definition of a woman I'm waiting for an answer.
I think Pixie huffs gasoline.
GET THIS STRAIGHT!. A newborns gender is AFFIRMED at birth NOT ASSIGNED
When is the Kaiser lady going to sat anything?
I have a DogCat and a CatDog….. literally dog acts very cat-ish and a Cat that acts real dog-ish…. So ye it’s a thing
I actually COMPLETELY disagree with Charlie on the thought that men don’t reflect on conversations. That sounds ridiculous to me, because I always do it: we always think about what we can do BETTER, SOLVING PROBLEMS. So we solve the problems of the past by reflecting on what we said, so that we can approach it better in the future.
I’m sorry, I don’t know how other men are, but I’ve reflected on loads of conversations over my lifetime to try to approach them better in the future. And I’m GLAD I did.
Oh no, our future as people are doomed
The narcissism and subjectivity is stunning.. Also, Pink was NEVER a "masculine color", Pink clothing was used as a status symbol - a color only the wealthy could afford - so that's why men (wealthy people in general) wore pink clothing... Now blue is INDEED a gendered color - it's been proven that boys are more attracted to blue than any other color, so there is certainly science that backs up the association between colors and gender.
Also ,,shows like this give these people a format
I really enjoyed where this debate went. One of my biggest concerns with this "Woke" way of thinking is, why is it a bad thing, for a man to display masculine characteristics? All of a sudden masculine has been turned into misogyny. As well as women's feminine traits are perceived as inferior or weak. I find that to be absurd. Women are strong when they can act with kindness and compassion in the face of adversity. While men can express their love by fighting for what they believe in, or by taking charge of a difficult situation. What is so wrong with that and why are these qualities all of a sudden viewed as bad or wrong? When we start allowing society to remove the mothers and fathers from the home (e.g., dad becomes soft and sensitive/mom becomes hard and non-nurturing) we will ultimately lose how and why humanity has managed to exist in the first place.
Um like yah righhht? Like like totally.
The confidence in their word salad is astounding.
My husband thinks a lot about movies…who produced, who starred. And music! Where does it come from how does it relate….and when will we be intimate next! Oh, and what’s to eat?
I want Charlie to address the point that a transgender becoming a female does not have a uterus or eggs to get pregnant so how are these women believing men can get pregnant
Plants, animals, humanity .. MALE OR FEMALE!💁♀️
What do they constitute is a man
"A lot of women can't get pregnant" but, they are of the nature to get pregnant. I hate that argument its so stupid and charlie and matt walsh have destroyed that view over and over already. Why can we dig someone up 100 years from now and know their sex? They can't answer that question and their argument dies there. Charlie did a great job here and I hope he got them to think critically about this issue.
My dog acts like a cat. So I call him a cat. Doesn’t mean he’s not a dog. He’s just less a stereotypical dog. He’s still a dog. Less or more just describes the stereotype, don’t change a binary.
How can something so simple be so hard?
I love Charlie Kirk, but he is wrong about men not replaying conversations. How would you remember anything? How would you be able to reference, comprehend and execute terms and conditions in business dealings? I don't think you can scientifically prove that. That is more unisex and dependent upon a personality and significance of the conversation to any one individual. A HUMAN MALE must be able to recall a conversation, analyze the effects and prepare for the outcome for survival.
There are societies in Polynesia that recognize feminine males and masculine females, but the sex isn't disputed. Fa'afafine and fa'afatama are fluid gender roles that move between male and female worlds. They perform roles in society and don't need to change from man to woman to perform these roles.
To be fair,he later did say "as a general rule"
7:16 I have to disagree with Charlie. He said that no male sit there and think about conversations they have had. I am a 25-year-old biological male. I think the conversations that I have had to try to gain as much information that I can from them whether it was a friendly argument, big or small conversations is not true It may be his truth, but it’s not for all of us. If for anyone that wants to get argumentative with the statement, I am a fan of Charlie.
My dog acts like a cat. So I call him a cat. Doesn’t mean he’s not a dog. He’s just less a stereotypical dog. He’s still a dog. Less or more just fits the stereotype don’t change a binary.
Only humans have the capacity to confuse simple biolegy like this. Dogs dont have any problems knowing the difference. Horses cows and every other animal know this simple fact.
Charlie Kirk is totally wrong about men not going over conversations that they’ve had in the past. As a normal man , I can tell you that conversations that were pivotal in my life that I’ve gone in a negative way, I have often thought about how they could’ve gone better, how I could’ve made my point better.
THE GIRLZ NEED TO SHUT UP AND STOP TALKING
I can’t think of where to begin to talk about how wrong Charlie Kirk is. He’s gotten almost everything wrong, I just don’t know where to begin with the amount of time I have today. He’s cherry picked his statistics, to fit his narrative, that just aren’t correct. Makes a few good points. But not many. He’s not the brightest bulb in the box.
if i ask you what is a woman and you give me a speech without telling me i will not take you seriously a s a person ever i will look at you as a joke
Spot on.
Who’s the girl with black hair and glasses?
I forget her name, but she is on a lot of episodes
Dumsybrown, do you agree with Charlie with reference to the ways men think.
I do
I'm overall in agreement with Charlie, but I don't think men universally think about sports and sex for 30 minutes. I have little interest in either. I'd say that sure, statistically, men and women's brains are different. But while there are 2 sexes, personality does exist on a spectrum
Of course! And he even says that early on! He states that we have PERSONALITIES which explain variations. But he is speaking in generalities-- most men will think about sports or sex quite often. You and I may not, but most men will.
@SquirtlePower809 it's amazing how many people miss that part everytime 😅😅
Can Charlie Garbage Pail Kid kirk tell me how a woman get pregnant by a holy ghost? 👻
Huh?
Can you pose an intelligent question?
@@grandpa6535 how can a woman get pregnant by a holy ghost?
Can you explain why you go so wildly off topic?
@@timkelly6985 the people that want to tell us what a woman is also want us to believe that a woman can get pregnant by a holy ghost.. If you guys say woman are xx chromosomes how is it possible a woman can get pregnant by a ghost? 👻
@garcia202 so this is what is known as a "red herring" fallacy in logic and argumentation. You are bringing up a whole new topic as a means of deflection and distraction since you do not have a way to successfully defend the current topic.
But, to your question, you are asking about the metaphysical realm when the issues being discussed are of the physical realm. I suggest you read some academic literature and books. Stephen Hawkings has a great discussion about the metaphysical in one of his works. There is also a great book on Quantum physics and celestial mechanics that does a great section on metaphysical studies and theory.
But, the short answer (of which there is a much longer one called "the bible") is that spiritual beings, in particular God, can move and work in different dimensions than humans whom are bound by the physical realm. And so, the Holy spirit (manifestation of God) can easily change, alter, create, destroy, or manipulate the physical realm. Creating life would be as easy as breathing, especially considering God created all life to begin with.
Now, if you have an ACTUAL and relevant argument for what has been discussed in this video, I would love to hear it. Otherwise you are just being a typical woke troll with nothing to say.