@@Noobie2k7 I have idea for monk.(Don't make a 12th classe) hm Give rogue a choice to have a second heropower instead of the normal spend 2 mana get a 1/2 weapon. Can't equip weapons. Costs 3 mana. Destroy one of your minions and shuffle the Left most card from your opponents hand back to their deck. Hopefully it fixes highlander warrior. Also maybe it helps coin rogue.
@@peshomighty5051That is incredibly weak, actually. You have the limitations of not being able to use your hero power unless you have a minion on board, not being able to get extra damage from your hero, and the drawbacks of increased mana cost and destroying your own value, all to briefly inconvenience your opponent in extremely specific situations.
@@edwardking9359 I thought a deathrattle token generating control deck. Which will be hard lack of board clears lack of weapons. well I'm not a game designer. Also I heard there was a passifist wow player that got max level by collecting flowers.
For adding a class, they might put in the “Evoker” class from the recent wow expansion. They have a cool mechanic where they can “build up” their powers for bigger effect so they might put that as a card mechanic
@@jblackrazz yeah maybe something like the forged giant that you could infinitely forge. Kinda forgot about that mechanic already, maybe they won’t do it :p
i think the most interesting mechanic for a monk would be "stagger" basically what it did/does in wow is that it makes it so you dont take the damage all at once, lets say 50% of the damage gets staggered that means if an attack does 100 damage, the monk will take 50 damage immediatly and the remaining 50 damage over the course of 10 seconds, i think something like that could be interesting for monk, the way i could see it work is that minions with stagger take half damage (rounded up) however the remaining damage is dealt to the minion at the end of the next turn making the minions rather sticky and with healing effects would mean that monk minions can trade up rather easily, it could also have synnergies like cards that remove active stagger's from your current minions, or a minion that when it takes stagger damage does the same amount of damage to a random enemy minion etc,, or spells that interact with stagger like "restore 4 health to a minion, if it has stagger restore it to full instead"
I think monk in general is not that great of a thing to introduce Demonhunter/Death knight are obviously very popular classes (both gameplay and thematic wise) but monk? ... do people even really care a ton about monk? seems like it would not bring in alot of players
@@cereza7526 you're talking as if most people play a hearthstone class purely because they like the class in wow, from my experience most wow players want nothing to do with hearthstone and vice versa
I recently had a dream they added an artificer/engineer class to Hearthstone. From what I recall it was all about buffing minions (like, singular minions, not wide boards like druid) that start off small and an emphasis on small impact but low cost effects like the spare parts. They also had a lot more locations than other classes and had some weird counter that went up when they played a spell or location, IDK what it did though.
Hey Rarran, this was a great video, I've been watching your vids for a bit lately, and I have been seeing how negative comments, get you down, and get deep in your head. Know that this was a great video, and a super fun idea. Epic cards are in such weird area, it was super fun to see what you two could come up with. Also you and Eddy have great synergy together. Have a great day dude, and keep that head held high, from one Canadian to another.
If I understood right, Rarran said that new classes (DH and DK) didn't draw much attention and he thinks it's because they exist in WoW already. I personally hard disagree. The issue imo is that we're talking about a card game. I played Hearthstone on release for a bit just to kill time, play against some friends, etc. More recently I'd only do quests then go play Battlegrounds. I have NOT played Demon Hunter yet myself and I like aggro, and I never even bothered unlocking Death Knight prior to a recent update where it seems like it auto unlocked. I feel like having to actually invest in building a deck for a specific class with some unique mechanics is just not enticing for people that're new. I don't have an insane amount of cards, dust, or enough interest to grind out resources to make a deck OR to spend the money. But if I do that with say Deaht Knight which has a unique mechanic, I imagine a lot of cards you want in their deck is not going to transfer to another deck, on top of the issue that they're mechanic might not end up fun. To try and summarize: New decks can be expensive, new classes have had unique mechanics, unique mechanics means less diverse methods to play. As a much newer player I've had no interest in coming in to try a new class knowing they're gonna likely require more investment and be less diverse until the mechanic is grown more. Demon Hunter for example is very aggro, if I want to play control I imagine it's a clown move to to try it with Demon Hunter, while if I said made a Warrior deck I could play most archetypes and a lot of cards will be transferable because things like execute, whirlwind, shield slam, etc, are just good. Half my deck can go into any archetype at times.
When you were chatting about a new class that isn't in warcraft, its funny how you said "Engineer class", but that is a class that exists already in warcraft
Talking about bringing monk into the game, I always imagined it to be based on combo for their hero powers where they had to rotate between minion to spell to minion to spell kinda like that naga, each rotation adds 1 damage to their hero power (starting at 0 with no cards played). Interesting play style while also being unique enough to keep it apart from the other classes. Run a load of small spell and minions or have minions / spells that reduce their cost if the opposite is played before it etc.
WOW Monks are basically classic martial arts archetypes, based on monks from DnD. Monks are already in the game somewhat as Brewmasters and some as rogues that are also concerned with bouncing, so presumably that would be the Monk’s main gimmick
4:50 what a bonkers take..."I dont think they should add monk because he would be too much like priest, but I dont know what a monk does in warcraft" "I dont think they should add baseball to the school athletic program because it would be too much like soccer since they both play with a ball, but I dont know how baseball works."
Hearthstone content creators being oblivious of anything WoW has been so oddly ubiquitous over the years. Even with the Hearthstone relation aside, it feels so unlikely that that many people of that age group have never touched WoW.
@@juliotorres3147it's really not, a lot of the time if people get into a spinoff videogame people get into the lore, hearthstone people not learning any lore is pretty odd, no one expects them to memorize everything, but you think they'd know bare minimums
@calebbarnhouse496 Why? The two games have basically nothing to do with each other besides flavour text, and WoW caters to an entirely different type of player to hearthstone. Even when it comes to MMOs, anyone getting into those these days is more likely to pick up something like FFXIV, since it's newer and looks prettier.
@@edwardking9359 it's amazing how you don't understand that warcraft has more to it then just world of warcraft and hearthstone, it still has the warcraft RTS games that are beloved, the fact is when a bunch of people go into a setting they don't know some people will want to know more, no one in hearthstone has done this, not even looking at lore videos
I think the idea of a new class being released FIRST for hearthstone and with a plan to bring it into wow in like a few months so wow players would come to get a sneak peek of the coming character would be an absolutely insane marketing play!
Have some comments about the class discussion. Monk in Warcraft (please excuse me if I've gotten anything wrong, it's been a hot minute since I played) is along the lines of Eastern monks instead of Western monks, so less about isolation leading to contemplation and more about improving the self leading to connection to the universe. What that translates to in WoW is that they do lots of punching/kicking and they're effectively magical, and from what I remember monk could fill any role. I don't know how they're going to translate a class that is supposed to be about the individual improving that can do anything. As to a new class that isn't played in WoW, I dunno about that. On one hand, the attachment to WoW is pretty much the identity of the game. On the other though, if they use it to 'announce' the next class for WoW, it could drive up a _lot_ of attention.
1 minute in the video, and I'm already laughing. ''Why did you pick Rogue'' Rarran asks, while try-harding on druid, preparing to druid things. Eddy responds... ''I got some synergies brewing!!! wait till I get this off!!!''
Well, there are a few cards that reference a rarity in their effect, so it is good to actually double check that your cards are all the right rarity when doing this kinda thing. Ngl it's crazy that you could do pure spell mage in epic only.
I think the Bllizzard overlap in Hearthstone COULD bring in a class that's not from the Warcraft universe. It'd just be REALLY hard to find a fantasy niche that's not already taken - your example of Necromancer steps on Death Knight's toes a wee bit too much. I'd suggest Witch Doctor, but there's good chances it'd tread on Shaman's territory a lot.
I think an extremely cool direction to take it would be a crossover with other blizzard games, something from starcraft/diablo/overwatch, in general I've been wanting full on crossover cards for years now like the zergs from starcraft or heroes from ow, there's already some diablo content but it's basically irrelevant as it's just a tavern brawl and nothing else
I don't know that much about WoW but I believe the only two classes not in hearthstone are the Monk and the Evoker class. I think it could be interesting to add a non-wow class but it might be hard to make it truly unique.
Printing real life card would be epic just for collections. Having a few framed legendary cards would look amazing on my wall. I would 100% get Reno. I think that card made hearthstone the most popular.
All classes they suggested they are already in world of warcraft they are just not playable so they can't really make anything new they can but 95% of concepts for classes are already in wow
I think it would be interesting to create a class for Hearthstone that exists within the warcraft universe, but not in a playable way. For example, in WoW there are some 'Spellbreakers' (which are sort of mage killers) or 'Dark Apothecary' (which are sort of alchemists that use plague), but these classes only exist on NPCs. Wouldn't that be a good way to bridge for people who are interested in warcraft but wouldn't really have a solid idea to expect in terms of playstyle for this fantasy of characters? Would love to hear your thoughts on this :)
I want monk in the game entirely because I'm a monk Stan. I play them in everything. My want for them is to have the stagger mechanic somehow as part of their hero power!
Monk would fit far closer with Rogue then Priest by a long shot. Combo cards in particular are closest to the flavor of it. Perhaps a hero power that used enhances the effect of cards it's used with or based on the card that is used it does different things. While it does have healing it's more like a regen healer with it's tank side being about staggering damage mostly delaying it and mitigating that delayed damage so it can be healed or partially nullified later. It could be a rather interesting class honestly to use the mechanics from the speccs though I can see what a balancing hell that could be.
For the ten year anniversary I want them to do a multiverse year expansion. 3 expansions with characters from overwatch, starcraft, and Diablo. We have Diablo kind of in the game for a special event and slight game mode, but that's it.
I mean, monk has tank, dps and heal spec. Hero portrait would definitly be a panda (maby chen as default and lili as bonus one)... I remember healing in dungeons and doing 2xdps of all others combined untill they nerfed dps healing (or took it away, last played on artefact weapon expansion)
The two new Hearthstone classes are represented by neutral legendary minions, Illidan and the Lich King Following the pattern, the alledged upcoming class is obvious It's the Angler class, baby! Let us play as Nat Pagle, you cowards!
I think a cool class would be inventor or engineer and have the hero power give you one of those old mech spare parts to hand and have it be like a build up units class.
For necromancer it sucks because it exists in warcraft (Kel'thuzad is a prime example of one) but is not playable and will probably never be due to warlock and deathknight already being playable choices. and for engineer I hope they one day add a tinker class that has that premise
Monk is known for delaying damage, combo, and low cost but spammable healing, I don’t know how that would transfer to hearthstone. Hero power for 2 gives a card combo? Heal 1 + 1 armor? Heal all owned minions by 1?
On the 7th Day of Crignemas, Rarran said to me 7 Gooners gooning 6 Hardly Know Hers 5 IQ plays 4 4 head 3 Deez Nuts 2 KEKWS And a pog in a pogging tree
also i dont think they should add a class that isnt in warcraft but im fine with them adding a class that isnt a playable class in WoW, the issue is most of those possiblities are sort of hybrid classes, like witchdoctor is in essence a shaman priest hybrid, shadowhunter is a rogue priest hybrid etc
you and eddy are a goated duo as always. You guys were talking about a new class and such, and were talking about monk or maybe even a new class and i think monk would be the best. I think the reason why people werent too hyped about dk, or at least me personally, was the class identity and gameplay is kinda sleeper tbh and the way the class plays in wow is fun but very basic, you know whats gonna happen and it isnt exciting in hs. Monk on the other hand has a lot more room to do cool shit, monk in wow is my personal favorite class to play and the themes could be super cool. for example, the tank spec in wow, brewmaster, would be super cool. its main tanking mechanic isnt gaining armor or healing like warrior or dk, its about being so drunk you feel the pain later so it spread the damage out. could be interesting, like it deals the damage to you over 2 turns. thematically there is so much room to build into for monk and its already there, it makes way more sense to do that than to create soemthing new out of thin air. you already have a giant database of thematic ideas and cool mechanics, and i think monk has maybe some of the coolest things you can do in all of warcraft. keep up the good work :)
I know this isn't about the video but since you're mentionning it, for the 10th years it baffled me that there hasn't been a revamp of the whole game in terms of UI and animations in matches, the main menu and even in game it feels so slow and outdated, you can have the most powerful pc and have the game fully crash because you missclicked on the resize icon, or even completely froze when you press "Play" or any other button for that matter, for me it's desperately needed!
@@budderk1305 Directly yes, but if marketed as a "revamp" or 2.0 or something of the sort with significant changes, articles and word would be spread across previous players that needed that *something* to comeback, it's still something
For the animations and ingame UI, I don't agree at all. That's clearly part of the ADN of Heartstone, this kind of rustic feeling, a bit slow, pretty skeuomorphic.
Necromancer would pretty much just be dk but slightly more warlock because in the warcraft universe there are necromancers and like death knights they raise the dead. However like warlocks they summin a lotta stuff and wear cloth
Monks are a hybrid class in wow.. they can tank/heal/and dps. I think it would be cool if they did a spin on druid. They get 1 attack and heal 1 damage instead of getting the armor. Edit* not even a minute later Edie said my idea and hated it lolol
aint no way making a new class just for hearthstone is gonna bring even 10% more players it, the only thing that'll bring in people is limited time mounts
For people that don't know, Monk is capable of all 3 roles in WoW. It can tank it can dps and it can heal. So calling it "just a priest" is hilariously ignorant. The interesting thing about Monk tank is that it mitigates by "stalling" damage, which I honestly could see being a mechanic exclusive to Monk.
![BOWKYLION - วิงวอน (ex-change) [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/cLdnZWDaO-w/mqdefault.jpg)
Eddy chilling with 2 psychic screams in hand saving them for game 6 was glorious
XD
well it’s not like it was a secret. he discarded one in the first priest game so rarran saw it
You and Eddy are so entertaining together, could watch you guys talk for hours
Epic are always so niche, independently from power level. That's why this is so funny.
Oh i was wondering why it was funny, ty for explaining
Op or unserwhelming xD
We don't talk about secret passage
that delivery on the "Oh it's free! EAT IT!" went so hard ngl. xD
Just for reference, WoW Monks are the "Eastern Martial Arts" archtype of Monk, so the overlap with Priest would be rather small.
I feel like mechanically it would more likely overlap with Rogue.
@@Noobie2k7 I have idea for monk.(Don't make a 12th classe)
hm Give rogue a choice to have a second heropower instead of the normal spend 2 mana get a 1/2 weapon.
Can't equip weapons.
Costs 3 mana.
Destroy one of your minions and shuffle the Left most card from your opponents hand back to their deck.
Hopefully it fixes highlander warrior.
Also maybe it helps coin rogue.
@@peshomighty5051That is incredibly weak, actually. You have the limitations of not being able to use your hero power unless you have a minion on board, not being able to get extra damage from your hero, and the drawbacks of increased mana cost and destroying your own value, all to briefly inconvenience your opponent in extremely specific situations.
@@edwardking9359 I thought a deathrattle token generating control deck. Which will be hard lack of board clears lack of weapons.
well I'm not a game designer. Also I heard there was a passifist wow player that got max level by collecting flowers.
You can always expect something by-the-book from Rarran and Eddy never fails to deliver something you don't expect.
For adding a class, they might put in the “Evoker” class from the recent wow expansion. They have a cool mechanic where they can “build up” their powers for bigger effect so they might put that as a card mechanic
Sounds like the Forge mechanic but with a different flavor.
@@jblackrazz yeah maybe something like the forged giant that you could infinitely forge. Kinda forgot about that mechanic already, maybe they won’t do it :p
still havent added the monk class which has been out for ages
I think something like a Engineer class could work for hearthstone. Tinkmaster could be the hero and class could have mech flavor.
i think the most interesting mechanic for a monk would be "stagger" basically what it did/does in wow is that it makes it so you dont take the damage all at once, lets say 50% of the damage gets staggered that means if an attack does 100 damage, the monk will take 50 damage immediatly and the remaining 50 damage over the course of 10 seconds, i think something like that could be interesting for monk, the way i could see it work is that minions with stagger take half damage (rounded up) however the remaining damage is dealt to the minion at the end of the next turn making the minions rather sticky and with healing effects would mean that monk minions can trade up rather easily, it could also have synnergies like cards that remove active stagger's from your current minions, or a minion that when it takes stagger damage does the same amount of damage to a random enemy minion etc,, or spells that interact with stagger like "restore 4 health to a minion, if it has stagger restore it to full instead"
I think monk in general is not that great of a thing to introduce
Demonhunter/Death knight are obviously very popular classes (both gameplay and thematic wise) but monk? ... do people even really care a ton about monk? seems like it would not bring in alot of players
@@cereza7526 you're talking as if most people play a hearthstone class purely because they like the class in wow, from my experience most wow players want nothing to do with hearthstone and vice versa
@@vhaelen326 So why would hearthstone players care about monk? The only reason it's even being talked about as an addition is because it's in WoW.
I recently had a dream they added an artificer/engineer class to Hearthstone. From what I recall it was all about buffing minions (like, singular minions, not wide boards like druid) that start off small and an emphasis on small impact but low cost effects like the spare parts. They also had a lot more locations than other classes and had some weird counter that went up when they played a spell or location, IDK what it did though.
I like this dream
Hey Rarran, this was a great video, I've been watching your vids for a bit lately, and I have been seeing how negative comments, get you down, and get deep in your head. Know that this was a great video, and a super fun idea. Epic cards are in such weird area, it was super fun to see what you two could come up with. Also you and Eddy have great synergy together. Have a great day dude, and keep that head held high, from one Canadian to another.
16:25 Also 🤔 Nicely done there Eddy, your backround aesthetic blends into the Gameboard.
If I understood right, Rarran said that new classes (DH and DK) didn't draw much attention and he thinks it's because they exist in WoW already.
I personally hard disagree. The issue imo is that we're talking about a card game. I played Hearthstone on release for a bit just to kill time, play against some friends, etc. More recently I'd only do quests then go play Battlegrounds. I have NOT played Demon Hunter yet myself and I like aggro, and I never even bothered unlocking Death Knight prior to a recent update where it seems like it auto unlocked.
I feel like having to actually invest in building a deck for a specific class with some unique mechanics is just not enticing for people that're new. I don't have an insane amount of cards, dust, or enough interest to grind out resources to make a deck OR to spend the money. But if I do that with say Deaht Knight which has a unique mechanic, I imagine a lot of cards you want in their deck is not going to transfer to another deck, on top of the issue that they're mechanic might not end up fun.
To try and summarize: New decks can be expensive, new classes have had unique mechanics, unique mechanics means less diverse methods to play. As a much newer player I've had no interest in coming in to try a new class knowing they're gonna likely require more investment and be less diverse until the mechanic is grown more. Demon Hunter for example is very aggro, if I want to play control I imagine it's a clown move to to try it with Demon Hunter, while if I said made a Warrior deck I could play most archetypes and a lot of cards will be transferable because things like execute, whirlwind, shield slam, etc, are just good. Half my deck can go into any archetype at times.
When you were chatting about a new class that isn't in warcraft, its funny how you said "Engineer class", but that is a class that exists already in warcraft
Eddy is back, sweet! You guys have some of the most unhinged conversations I've heard, really reminds me of shooting the shit with my mates.
Talking about bringing monk into the game, I always imagined it to be based on combo for their hero powers where they had to rotate between minion to spell to minion to spell kinda like that naga, each rotation adds 1 damage to their hero power (starting at 0 with no cards played). Interesting play style while also being unique enough to keep it apart from the other classes.
Run a load of small spell and minions or have minions / spells that reduce their cost if the opposite is played before it etc.
WOW Monks are basically classic martial arts archetypes, based on monks from DnD. Monks are already in the game somewhat as Brewmasters and some as rogues that are also concerned with bouncing, so presumably that would be the Monk’s main gimmick
"what cards are you gonna miss in standard" "none of them" he was so real for that
4:50 what a bonkers take..."I dont think they should add monk because he would be too much like priest, but I dont know what a monk does in warcraft"
"I dont think they should add baseball to the school athletic program because it would be too much like soccer since they both play with a ball, but I dont know how baseball works."
Hearthstone content creators being oblivious of anything WoW has been so oddly ubiquitous over the years. Even with the Hearthstone relation aside, it feels so unlikely that that many people of that age group have never touched WoW.
@@juliotorres3147it's really not, a lot of the time if people get into a spinoff videogame people get into the lore, hearthstone people not learning any lore is pretty odd, no one expects them to memorize everything, but you think they'd know bare minimums
@calebbarnhouse496 Why? The two games have basically nothing to do with each other besides flavour text, and WoW caters to an entirely different type of player to hearthstone. Even when it comes to MMOs, anyone getting into those these days is more likely to pick up something like FFXIV, since it's newer and looks prettier.
@@edwardking9359 it's amazing how you don't understand that warcraft has more to it then just world of warcraft and hearthstone, it still has the warcraft RTS games that are beloved, the fact is when a bunch of people go into a setting they don't know some people will want to know more, no one in hearthstone has done this, not even looking at lore videos
16:10 POV: my face when I was sitting in the same position as enthusiastic banker with the same expression on my face
I think the idea of a new class being released FIRST for hearthstone and with a plan to bring it into wow in like a few months so wow players would come to get a sneak peek of the coming character would be an absolutely insane marketing play!
"we gooning" VINE BOOM "we a couple of gooners" VINE BOOM
Have some comments about the class discussion.
Monk in Warcraft (please excuse me if I've gotten anything wrong, it's been a hot minute since I played) is along the lines of Eastern monks instead of Western monks, so less about isolation leading to contemplation and more about improving the self leading to connection to the universe. What that translates to in WoW is that they do lots of punching/kicking and they're effectively magical, and from what I remember monk could fill any role. I don't know how they're going to translate a class that is supposed to be about the individual improving that can do anything.
As to a new class that isn't played in WoW, I dunno about that. On one hand, the attachment to WoW is pretty much the identity of the game. On the other though, if they use it to 'announce' the next class for WoW, it could drive up a _lot_ of attention.
1 minute in the video, and I'm already laughing.
''Why did you pick Rogue'' Rarran asks, while try-harding on druid, preparing to druid things.
Eddy responds... ''I got some synergies brewing!!! wait till I get this off!!!''
7:25 Pretty neat idea there 🤔
monk just drinks white claw and get's into drunk bare handed street fight's so a prefect class
15:30 u should see smite skins
The absolute cold cut endings are my favorite shit.
Engineer class sounds cool af, something like the new Mechgnome race with a lot of mechs.
I love rarrans drew gooden collabs
Eddy does kinda look like Drew Gooden lmao
Best duo i can imagine playin hs. This videos of duals agains eddy are always a highlight for me
Well, there are a few cards that reference a rarity in their effect, so it is good to actually double check that your cards are all the right rarity when doing this kinda thing.
Ngl it's crazy that you could do pure spell mage in epic only.
Rarran out here making his own tavern brawls
It'd be cool to see what weird archetypes you guys would make with a Commons Only deck 🙃
Hearthstone Pauper. Would be cool as a Twist format
@@ThatWildcard Agreed
it's just gonna be aggro meta, commons are mostly minions with no effects or spells with simple effects like discover or heal/deal x damage.
@@ThatWildcard oh hey guess what lol
@@rajkanishu did they make Hearthstone Pauper?
it physically hurt me not seeing him play a devolving missiles against a naked 4/20 holy
I think the Bllizzard overlap in Hearthstone COULD bring in a class that's not from the Warcraft universe.
It'd just be REALLY hard to find a fantasy niche that's not already taken - your example of Necromancer steps on Death Knight's toes a wee bit too much.
I'd suggest Witch Doctor, but there's good chances it'd tread on Shaman's territory a lot.
"You require more pylons"
StarCraft has a class can be super cool or even just a "in space" set with overlap and references to it@@thefinalboss4471
New class, "Just some guy"
I think an extremely cool direction to take it would be a crossover with other blizzard games, something from starcraft/diablo/overwatch, in general I've been wanting full on crossover cards for years now like the zergs from starcraft or heroes from ow, there's already some diablo content but it's basically irrelevant as it's just a tavern brawl and nothing else
This video is SO epic!
I see myself out
This is going to be EPIC
That first priest game was comedy
Edit: correction, EVERY game with the priest
Necromancer would literally be just an unholy DK in Hearthstone.
i love the collabs with eddy
Dragons fury into 1 cost is just classic hearthstone
Hearthstone originally WAS a physical card game, the WoW TCG. I still remember when it was sold in stores... Wish they kept it in paper.
Reminds me of control warrior back in the day that would run like 8 legendaries and a shotload of epics
Impossible challenge: take a shot every time Rarran says "completely honest with you" or "completely honest"
monk would be a cool class to add. they got 3 awesome specs to pull from
My leading theory has always been that Monk would play for tempo and have Focus (Finale) as a class identity [But now it seems less likely.
I have NEVER seen a blood of the ancient one deck work lmaooo
Epic cards either shatter the meta or are easily forgotten
The innkeeper new class confirmed!
I don't know that much about WoW but I believe the only two classes not in hearthstone are the Monk and the Evoker class.
I think it could be interesting to add a non-wow class but it might be hard to make it truly unique.
Printing real life card would be epic just for collections. Having a few framed legendary cards would look amazing on my wall. I would 100% get Reno. I think that card made hearthstone the most popular.
fun fact there is already a physical warcraft card game and it wasnt very good
Love the chemistry between you two, much love ❤
Very fun video. Enjoyed is greatly. Eddy and Rarran are quite the duo
never played WoW before Hearthstone, actually didnt know that it was based on it when I played it first I think
Lmao I love the fact that monk, a dnd class, seems the most unintuitive to figure out for them compared to demon hunter and death knight
All classes they suggested they are already in world of warcraft they are just not playable so they can't really make anything new they can but 95% of concepts for classes are already in wow
I think it would be interesting to create a class for Hearthstone that exists within the warcraft universe, but not in a playable way. For example, in WoW there are some 'Spellbreakers' (which are sort of mage killers) or 'Dark Apothecary' (which are sort of alchemists that use plague), but these classes only exist on NPCs. Wouldn't that be a good way to bridge for people who are interested in warcraft but wouldn't really have a solid idea to expect in terms of playstyle for this fantasy of characters? Would love to hear your thoughts on this :)
its so goofy I love it
I want monk in the game entirely because I'm a monk Stan. I play them in everything. My want for them is to have the stagger mechanic somehow as part of their hero power!
Monk would fit far closer with Rogue then Priest by a long shot. Combo cards in particular are closest to the flavor of it. Perhaps a hero power that used enhances the effect of cards it's used with or based on the card that is used it does different things. While it does have healing it's more like a regen healer with it's tank side being about staggering damage mostly delaying it and mitigating that delayed damage so it can be healed or partially nullified later. It could be a rather interesting class honestly to use the mechanics from the speccs though I can see what a balancing hell that could be.
Epic collab.
For the ten year anniversary I want them to do a multiverse year expansion. 3 expansions with characters from overwatch, starcraft, and Diablo.
We have Diablo kind of in the game for a special event and slight game mode, but that's it.
I mean, monk has tank, dps and heal spec. Hero portrait would definitly be a panda (maby chen as default and lili as bonus one)...
I remember healing in dungeons and doing 2xdps of all others combined untill they nerfed dps healing (or took it away, last played on artefact weapon expansion)
The two new Hearthstone classes are represented by neutral legendary minions, Illidan and the Lich King
Following the pattern, the alledged upcoming class is obvious
It's the Angler class, baby! Let us play as Nat Pagle, you cowards!
I think a cool class would be inventor or engineer and have the hero power give you one of those old mech spare parts to hand and have it be like a build up units class.
Reno needs his own class
For necromancer it sucks because it exists in warcraft (Kel'thuzad is a prime example of one) but is not playable and will probably never be due to warlock and deathknight already being playable choices. and for engineer I hope they one day add a tinker class that has that premise
Monk would be a mix of paladin and rogue pretty much, buffing units and combo effects
NOOOOOOOOOOOO RARRAN LOOKED IT UP
Monk is known for delaying damage, combo, and low cost but spammable healing, I don’t know how that would transfer to hearthstone. Hero power for 2 gives a card combo? Heal 1 + 1 armor? Heal all owned minions by 1?
Releasing a new class among all games would be excellent for the anniversary.
I think a cool route to go would be to make tavernkeeper into a class, just imagine being able to play as bob
Harth is the tavernkeeper though. Should start with him, with Bob as an alternate skin.
Really holding onto Twist
On the 7th Day of Crignemas, Rarran said to me
7 Gooners gooning
6 Hardly Know Hers
5 IQ plays
4 4 head
3 Deez Nuts
2 KEKWS
And a pog in a pogging tree
A new class called "the innkeeper" would be pretty cool. Or the tavern keeper
also i dont think they should add a class that isnt in warcraft but im fine with them adding a class that isnt a playable class in WoW, the issue is most of those possiblities are sort of hybrid classes, like witchdoctor is in essence a shaman priest hybrid, shadowhunter is a rogue priest hybrid etc
Highlight of my day! Thank you for the amazing content Rarran!!!
you and eddy are a goated duo as always. You guys were talking about a new class and such, and were talking about monk or maybe even a new class and i think monk would be the best. I think the reason why people werent too hyped about dk, or at least me personally, was the class identity and gameplay is kinda sleeper tbh and the way the class plays in wow is fun but very basic, you know whats gonna happen and it isnt exciting in hs. Monk on the other hand has a lot more room to do cool shit, monk in wow is my personal favorite class to play and the themes could be super cool. for example, the tank spec in wow, brewmaster, would be super cool. its main tanking mechanic isnt gaining armor or healing like warrior or dk, its about being so drunk you feel the pain later so it spread the damage out. could be interesting, like it deals the damage to you over 2 turns. thematically there is so much room to build into for monk and its already there, it makes way more sense to do that than to create soemthing new out of thin air. you already have a giant database of thematic ideas and cool mechanics, and i think monk has maybe some of the coolest things you can do in all of warcraft. keep up the good work :)
I know this isn't about the video but since you're mentionning it, for the 10th years it baffled me that there hasn't been a revamp of the whole game in terms of UI and animations in matches, the main menu and even in game it feels so slow and outdated, you can have the most powerful pc and have the game fully crash because you missclicked on the resize icon, or even completely froze when you press "Play" or any other button for that matter, for me it's desperately needed!
maybe as DLC, cause nothing what you wrote in that paragraph makes money for shareholders, lmao
Small indie game company
@@budderk1305 Directly yes, but if marketed as a "revamp" or 2.0 or something of the sort with significant changes, articles and word would be spread across previous players that needed that *something* to comeback, it's still something
For the animations and ingame UI, I don't agree at all. That's clearly part of the ADN of Heartstone, this kind of rustic feeling, a bit slow, pretty skeuomorphic.
But hey, they can afford to revamp the microtransaction store!!! Awesome!!!
god i hate blizzard
the difference in brightness from the different POVs is hurting my head
Hots had some bawler skins.
"Just a bunch of gooners"
This comment is specifically for Rarran after hes completely forgotten the context of this video he recorded weeks ago :)
They should unnerf Renethal, make him an Epic, and require both to be in the deck to get the effect.
Necromancer would pretty much just be dk but slightly more warlock because in the warcraft universe there are necromancers and like death knights they raise the dead. However like warlocks they summin a lotta stuff and wear cloth
I wpuld love to see hs in vr for the ten year anniversary but we didnt get it
Monks are a hybrid class in wow.. they can tank/heal/and dps. I think it would be cool if they did a spin on druid. They get 1 attack and heal 1 damage instead of getting the armor.
Edit* not even a minute later Edie said my idea and hated it lolol
Awesome video :) keep making more with L Teddy
aint no way making a new class just for hearthstone is gonna bring even 10% more players it, the only thing that'll bring in people is limited time mounts
Monk you just think priest but with a big martial arts element to it :)
i love how eddy talked about a physical card game, there already is it was just shit xD
Okay, that was epics
Rarran is on fire
monk smacks with his fists bro c'mon.
For people that don't know, Monk is capable of all 3 roles in WoW. It can tank it can dps and it can heal.
So calling it "just a priest" is hilariously ignorant.
The interesting thing about Monk tank is that it mitigates by "stalling" damage, which I honestly could see being a mechanic exclusive to Monk.
If they add a new class I would want it to be something silly, like a clown, or Whizbang
Monks a hybrid class and can do tank heal or damage so like who knows what that class would look like in hearth
Please my friends, do not say "Idk what monks would do but I guess priest" xD.
can’t wait for legendaries only
My 2 favorite Goons!