it's also a lie. most shipping lane bridges have failsafes in place to prevent total collapse of the structure in the event of collision from common traffic within the shipping lane
@@selfdee7754 that depends on your definition of “designed for” if something is built with failsafes in case an outside force impacts, does that mean it was built for it? Or was it build to have as little damage happen *despite* it.
"ancient civilizations knew the earth was flat" the egyptians built the pyramids with the earth's curvature in mind, as they have managed to calculate it with pretty good precision using nothing but stone tools and observation
Eratosthenes, an ancient Greek polymath who worked at the library of Alexandria 2000ya proved the earth was round by using shadows and calculating distances. Aristotle also recognized the earth was spherical a few hundred years before. The Flat earthers are grasping at straws
The reason the world is depicted as flat in the artworks they've made is purely an artistical and metaphorical decision, NOT because they literally thought that the world was actually flat.
@SanityTV_Last_Sane_Man_Alive how is that sexism? Could’ve just mistaken the user for a male they weren’t saying the whole male population as a whole they meant the singular person in the video who tries to say cats are vegan. Do you even know proper English?
@SanityTV_Last_Sane_Man_Alive I use dude and bro gender neutrally. Everyone's a dude. And besides, how could i even know their gender solely based on their pfp and online name ?
@@declansavage519 No the explosive force of a cannon shot can kill you without need for a cannonball assuming you're close enough, and given the right momentum the cannon itself would likely also be incredibly lethal to be hit by.
@@sebagab9795 It's not free speech, only one message is visible and the average user has no say in what the message says. And X only benefits from them because bad actors can still block anyone that even slightly challenges them or limit who can reply, but they can't do a thing about the notes. Even then, it's only a net good until people figure out how to exploit the "diversity of perspectives" system the way they do with the algorithm.
@@LuciusC Being able to block people you don't like is part of the right to privacy policy. You have a right to disregard people you don't want to listen to. Community notes are most of the time for us, not the person who made the post.
@@sebagab9795 Well you're technically correct. Currently when a community note calls someone a "turbo-n**ce" that's a feature, yet if I do it in the replies it's a violation of their privacy and they have a right to disregard me, preventing me from making any future posts against them. Oh, and on sites like this even that first post will get hidden if the overlords detect a naughty word. That isn't free speech, that's elite speech.
@@LuciusC If you replied to them and then got blocked by them, you didn't lose free speech, you're just being ignored. Also, Twitter* Referring to that cesspool with the name that sounds like a porn site is stupid ong 🤣
There actually is a genetic condition where your hair turns gray in youth. One of my great relatives had it. Completely different from thinking bleaching your hair is hereditable ofc, but still.
@@zeriel9148 Entirely different situation than what they're talking about but still, maybe someone learned from this. I knew one that had what looked like pure white hair naturally, he was also on the paler side skinwise, so pretty sure he was born with some kind of deficiency. I'd kill to have natural hair like that dude had though. I really liked it.
3:25 this guys whole argument falls apart when you take into consideration that cannons usually are not aimed at people, but structures (some exceptions, especially grape shot)
I’ll say it again because kids these days don’t understand the horror of war the cannon was aimed at the ground so it would skip along the ground ripping off limbs which is effective but the real effect comes from not the guy who guys splattered but the 20 guys who get their friend splattered on them and the psychological effect of having to clean up chunks of your fellows after the battle it raises the cost of fighting it’s a psychological weapon and an attrition weapon primarily
@@nothanks9503The psychological effects do not inhibit one ability to aim a gun or swing a sword. Did you know that skipping cannon balls on the ground seldom took off limbs and instead would trip people over or kill one person who would stop the impact. Cannons are designed to be aimed at buildings, but they also have munitions designed for infantry.
@@JonasGutenwald-yj8th The psychological effects do absolutely effect your ability to aim a gun and align a sword swing you lose fine motor skills when under the effects of stress hormones they help you take damage and keep moving not necessarily keep you in top fighting shape
i think the notion behind obligate carnivores is that they MUST eat meat, but it seems that felines are obligate carnivores because they can't convert carotene into vitamin A ... so if you supplement Vit A it may be possible for felines to survive without consuming liver or other animal products but i don't know for sure . if it turns out felines just require supplementation to be vegan then that's cool and i wouldn't fault a cat owner for trying .
@@someguy79 Please don't run unscientific experiments on your pets. The idea may sound plausible but the average vegan doesn't know when to give up, and definitely don't have the equipment for monitoring health adequately in the first place. And they won't use a control group at home either, so it's pretty meaningless.
@@LuciusC i should've said i wouldn't fault a cat owner for investigating the possibility further , and a million other caveats ... firstly, i do not own a cat and do not condone practices that may endanger the health of any human or nonhuman animal . secondly, and to reiterate, i was suggesting it may be _possible_ based on a two second google . thirdly, i absolutely agree with you regarding proper safety and scientific rigor , and upon further reading, cats would require even more supplementation than humans in order to maintain a meatless diet ... and i wouldn't do that to any cat . lastly, i have a dog and i feed her mostly unsalted lean chicken and veggies i know she likes . thank you for the reply
so, upon further reading, felines require pretty heavy supplementation (not just Vit A but also taurine and arginine, Vit D, and something called arachidonic acid , and maybe more) to be vegan and it can cause health problems for them like UTIs so you have to test their urine. and that's assuming you can get them to eat the plant food with vitamins and stuff in it ... yeah, i wouldn't put a cat or person through any of that. so it turns out it may be POSSIBLE but i cannot agree with pet owners forcing a meatless diet on their felines due to the health risks alone .
Almost every weapon is not made to kill in fact. The majority are made just for people to own and to have fun with (ie plinking for bang sticks, HEMA for poky sticks, etc.) The idea that every weapon (by which you mean gun) is designed to kill is looking at the intent behind the original designs for that type of weapon, in which case almost everything you own was designed to kill or facilitate killing, including whatever you typed this message on, because that is how we work as a species.
11:15 I find it funny that this post used a poster image of Sousou no Frieren (aka Frieren: Beyond Journey's End) despite the fact that it isn't an isekai anime, just a regular fantasy anime.
@@marcobering3945 Probably because it is common for none anime watchers to think Isekai is synonymous with the fantasy genre (also the article likely mentions it as well).
Because the article stupidly quotes a Japanese streaming claiming that "isekai" is anything that takes place in a world other than our own. They misunderstand the context of the word isekai as a genre and claim people are using the word wrong, believing it means "another world" from the viewer's perspective even though as a genre isekai is defined as "another world" from the protagonists perspective.
The abundance of XCOM players shows that most people don't understand that low chance doesn't mean impossible. Except for the RP enjoyers, those just roll with it.
Also, a cannon doesn't have to hit you to kill you. If it hits the ground near you, the impact throws rock fragments and debris at high speeds all around like a grenade.
11:24 the worst part is Sousou no Frieren is not an Isekai. It is just a regular fantasy story. No reincarnation, no teleporting into the world, just a near immortal elf's journey to meet the ghost of the human who changed her life.
If enough time has passed between then and now, it could still count. Changing worlds doesn't have to mean you were the one that moved. The world could move instead.
@@williambarnes5023 That is a fair point. The series does go to some pretty great lengths to show how much has changed in the 80 years since the Hero's Party ended their 10 year journey. and how much has changed in the 1,000+ years Frieren has lived. But at the end of the day, no anime site in their right mind is tagging Frieren as an Isekai.
Because the article stupidly quotes a Japanese streaming claiming that "isekai" is anything that takes place in a world other than our own. They misunderstand the context of the word isekai as a genre and claim people are using the word wrong, believing it means "another world" from the viewer's perspective even though as a genre isekai is defined as "another world" from the protagonists perspective.
@@williambarnes5023 It's not isekai if the world develops (or undevelops) around the character in the period of a set amount of years. That's just how life works. lol
Not really savage in my opinion, just regular people who actually this wonderful thing basic common sense... honestly, I haven't watched these kind of video in a very long time so I'm fortunate enough not to have to deal with this crap. Fr, some of these people are either opportunistic who try to make money by spreading misinformation, or they are actually THAT freaking stupid. Thank god I Don't use twitter or x or whatever the hell it's supposed to be called .
The good part of the internet is it gives everyone a voice and allows people of all kinds to meet and find eachother. The bad part of the internet is it gives EVERYONR a voice and allows people of ALL kinds to meet and find eachother.
That last one about autism reminds me of a response I read to a similar post years ago. To paraphrase: “Mount Everest wasn’t discovered until 1856, but I’m pretty sure the damn mountain was still there!”
2:13 ugh. I don't care if ppl are vegan. I'm Indian, basically most of my relatives are either vegetarian or vegan. I hate vegans who feel the need to feel superior for it and impose it on everyone else. Srsly, refusing to feed an obligate carnivore meat is animal abuse.
I eat meat. I have a friend who is vegan. We never have any trouble with that. How? We respect each other's decision. He is religious. I am not. We never have any trouble with that. How? We respect each other's decision.
The cannon one made me laugh, so cannons are non lethal because they aren’t likely to hit people? Well, they do seem pretty darn lethal if they blew a big hole out through your torso.
and even if we're defining lethality as the probability of getting killed by one rather than its potential to kill, the cannonball doesn't need to hit you to kill you. if it blows a hole in something next to you, you're probably gonna get killed by the shrapnel
Not to mention, cannons aren’t meant to be shot at a person. They’re meant to be shot at structures. Trust me, the people in said structures aren’t going to be getting out in one piece after a cannon shot. And if we’re talking about likelihood of death from a machine, ban cars before guns. Cars kill far more people than guns do. Really, most machines are incredibly effective at inflicting death. What about ships? Rollercoasters? Airplanes? Factory equipment? Farming equipment? That guy’s a dunce.
@@DannyDevitoOffical-TrustMeBro While all true, this isn't even the reasoning behind the guy in the vid's rant about cannons. He said cannons should be banned because they AREN'T lethal... So this guy is probably one of those NRA simp gun-nuts that think less powerful fire-arms should be banned because it increases the chances of him dying if he ever gets attacked by his many imaginary political enemies. He's still wrong, regardless, but now he's wrong on MULTIPLE levels. How great.
X-COM: "The shot has a 1% chance to hit you" Player: "Yes" X-COM: "So it CAN hit" Player: "Makes sense to me" X-COM: "Your character just died from it" Player: "HOW DID THAT HIT!? This game is BS!"
For the bit all the way at the end there. IIrc, the term autism was first coined in 1912, though back then it was believed to be a side symptom of schizophrenia. It wasn't until the late 1940s that it was recognized as its own. Obviously that didn't stop people form being misdiagnosed though. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong though.
Honestly you're really close! 😊. The only differences is that it was 1911 not 1912, and it was the 50's not the 40's. And then it completely swapped meaning in the 1970's lol. Good job though! you didn't spread anything bad-- but a neat topic I was interested to learn about!
Also, part of the increase in documented cases of autism is the fact that autism was much harder to diagnose in girls, so a lot of high-functioning autistic girls were going undiagnosed.
If I still posted on twitter, every time I saw a vegan forcing their awful diet onto an obligate carnivore I'd want to tweet them a video of a cow eating a rodent/bird and tell them the universe is trying to balance out their selfishness.
@SanityTV_Last_Sane_Man_Alive You know, making a strawman of "Yeah well cats face worse :(" Doesnt really make sense here. If you can prevent deaths by malnutrition, you should. Its not as though properly feeding a cat denies the opportunity for other improvements to their lives. Please quit trying to sympathize with an animal abuser.
The one person who is talking about cats having a plant based diet: You should never be aloud to have a pet of any kind because that is animal cruelty. Cats are carnivores, the extent of their plant-eating is grass and they only do that to help with digestion.
Because the article stupidly quotes a Japanese streamer claiming that "isekai" is anything that takes place in a world other than our own. They misunderstand the context of the word isekai as a genre and claim people are using the word wrong, believing it means "another world" from the viewer's perspective even though as a genre isekai is defined as "another world" from the protagonists perspective.
@@tovarishchfeixiao What are you talking about? I'm a bot because I copy pasted my response instead of typing a custom reply to every person that is confused by the same thing without actually looking at the article?
Its also kinda confusing, we see at the start that the player is wearing modern clothing and is heavily implied to be from the future with their proficiency with poke balls, i don't get the note unless its talking specifically about the rival character which makes no sence becuase why would they?
Val i had dream of you narrating a meme saying" you ain't burger enough to ride the hot dog rollercoaster because you will be savaged" and you did vlog there riding the hot dog rollercoaster
Most wrong information is the one shared on social media or news websites. Finding proper factual information takes some more reading and time, which most people don't care for or have time for. You'd be baffled how many just build their opinions on only reading a headline, not even the entire article.
Funnily enough if you google "Did the vikings believe earth was flat" the first google results state "The early ancient Greeks, Sumerians, Babylonians, Egyptians and Vikings all believed that the Earth was a flat disc or plane surrounded by water." Bit of a loaded statement but there's very little evidence that even the Vikings would believe the Earth was flat, if they cared at all as the Norse faith structure saw their world as part of a larger world on the World Tree rather than a planet nor particularly cared for explaining where the tree starts or ends.
@@Lewtable Incredible that one of the most rough living civilizations, the one which didn't really care about "planets", is smarter than a flat earther.
I like how many community notes are essentially: Tweet: This thing happened and it is horrible! Community notes: This thing did not happen. Wikipedia link.
Eh,speaking as a bi gal, there are those who just hate the thought of bi people and can't fathom that there is something else than being just gay or just straight. All gay otherwise you are a fake and traitor to the community. There are always toxic people in every community.
4:01 strictly speaking, the grail in question didn’t belong to Jesus but the wealthy person who hosted the Last Supper. It was also the fancy cup traditionally set out for Elijah during Passover. So, probably not that fancy, but probably not a simple clay cup either.
I mean, if we really want to get into the details, the concept of the Holy Grail as this powerful magical lost item is entirely extra-Biblical folklore. In the text itself, nothing suggests it was ever anything more than just a cup Jesus drank from and used to demonstrate the sacramental wine. So, even if the Bible were real, the “Holy Grail” wouldn’t be. So . . . there’s a LOT of meta levels we could pick through here.
@@capadociaash8003Well of course they do. Nearly al modern scholars are Christians. They won't let a little thing like the actual records indicating that the Cult of Cristus was a group of individuals similar to BLM or Antifa get in the way of rewriting history to support their religious beliefs.
14:00 There is a MASSIVE difference between 30 and 60 fps. But if they compared 60 to 120 It would at least be reasonable. But I do agree that 30 plays "fine" as it is the bare minimum for any hand eye coordination skill based games.
I grew up playing at 30, so I'm perhaps a little biased, but it's absolutely acceptable in anything but competitive/high-reaction-time games. Of course that's only true if 30 is your _target_ fps; if you're expecting to play at 60 (or higher) and it drops down to 30, that's a different story. Would I prefer to play at 60? Yeah, obviously. But that doesn't mean it's unplayable, or even really _that_ bad once you can acclimate to it
@@tovarishchfeixiao ...do you think remorse can only exist for crime? People can feel remorse for accidentally stepping on an ant, remorse is not exclusive to doing crime
no, because its hilarious. If you're too stupid to verify something, that isn't anyone else's fault but you're own community notes are the start of the internet becoming populated with people that have the study/research skills of a kindergartner
Ya it's more of a prevent small collision type thing, not full tilt head on. Bridges would be astronomically more expensive and not even possible to build if they were built that way. But they do have some measures in place you are 100% right
I read somewhere that the fenders here were too small to prevent the damage done by this big boat and bigger fenders could have prevented this. This is likely because the fenders were built with the bridge in a period of time where the boating traffic there was on average with significantly smaller vessels, and they never considered "updating it" for the increase in the size of traffic there. Not sure if that is true though, but it may have been. The US does struggle a bit with updating and upkeeping some vital infrastructure in certain states.
We need community notes outside of X (formerly known as Twitter) on everything from as seen on tv products, to news channels and especially politicians and they should be forced to respond to them in real time.
"Straight Bisexual and Gay Bisexual" Whattttt? That dosen't.. make any sense. I don't... what? _The whole point of being Bi is that we're BOTH._ Edit: What the heck did I just stew up in my replies tho
But isn't bisexuals usually have a specific gender that they prefer to be with more than the other tho? And from that perspective, it kinda could make sense if you refer to the preferences. (note: i used "gender" because i don't want youtube to delete my comment for using the other word)
@@tovarishchfeixiaoNo, some do but not all. And their perspective is insanity and tribalism, they're full of hatred and heterophobia, no better than homophobes. Saying all this as someone that's bi with more same-s*x experience
i dont wanna argue or anything so this isn't meant as aggressive but in LGBTQ history (especially lesbians), people who identified as bi and something for whatever reason tend to be accepted in non-exclusionist spaces. Same with trans men who call themselves lesbians. Any gay/lesbian/bi people (including me) I've actually met irl don't really care lol. its a weird complex thing to get into. and @burnttoast26, please do some more research instead of just assuming it's homophobic. thanks
"Children should not be playing GTA6!" No shit. I want to know where on earth this person got the impression that any game in the Grand Theft Auto franchise was meant to be played by children. Don't tell me this is one of those people who believe that all video games are meant for children.
@@johnnotrealname8168Dude, children literally can’t play the game without parents buying it for them. And it’s not wrong to make those types of games you dunce 💀
I always imagine Community Notes as a guy with glasses and a deadpan voice, sighing at the start of every sentence as they correct someone So when they say stuff like, 15:42, 16:05, 17:47, and 18:50 it cracks me up
6:08 The community note is just wrong itself. Alexander the Great was, in fact, not gay or bi. Him being upset when his friend died being taken out of context is the only thing there is for proof.
Community notes are meant to provide missing context, because the biggest deception is often the choice of narrative made by picking which facts to report and how to spin them. If it doesn't state who shot the dog, the most likely candidate would be the suspects, not the cops. Community notes provided the missing context and exposed the real story.
0:31 I like how with this one they try to make it seem normal in the first two panels. It's fine to have an animal as a best friend and my mom considers her dogs my siblings (ok that one might be weird) but the last guy is just a straight up zoophile.
My aunt considered her dog a child and sibling to my cousins (to the point he aparently recived more atention than her own children). She only realised that when the dog died.
Considering They are pushing to make...adult activities with animals...and minors...legal...... Yes. They really are. (LookIntoWhatTheyCall"AgeGapLove")
1:12 Ancient cultures believed that the Earth was flat, and that the Sun and Moon travelled under it when not in the sky. Never a Sun nor Moon circling above. Also, several of those came to the realization that the Earth is a globe.
Didn't the ancient Norse Vikings think the world was flat until a few of the raiders came back and was like "Yeah. So uh, we sailed around the world, it's a giant ball." Or am I thinking of something else? Also, several cultures figured out the earth was a globe because when they were building, they realized that the earth was slightly curved, so they had to take into account that curvature.
Also, most of those beliefs were based either on superstitions (refusing to investigate further the matter) or the fact that they only had knowledge of its territory and a couple of kilometers beyond. For example, the fact that if people search maps of the time and not single one mentions America is very telling of their view and its validation
6:20 "There are two spiritual dangers in not owning a farm. One is the danger of supposing that breakfast comes from the grocery, and the other that heat comes from the furnace." - Aldo Leopold, A Sand County Almanac, 1949
2:55 - Just a bit of clarification on this, raw meats _can_ contain diseases such as salmonella, but the actual risk of that depends on the particular type of meat, where it's sourced from, how it's prepared and whether it's _raw_ raw or cured. Some examples: - In Japan, Torisashi (chicken sashimi, made with very thinly sliced raw chicken breast) is a delicacy, but the sourced chicken HAS to be raised and prepared in pristine conditions for it to be safe to eat. Chicken from an American factory farm is WAY out of the question. - It's generally not a good idea to eat truly raw pork. However, many forms of cured ham are _technically_ raw but cured with salt, which helps kill bacteria. - Beef is usually a lot safer. You still want to exercise caution but the chances of getting sick from raw beef are only slightly higher than raw _saltwater_ fish. - Freshwater fish has to be cooked, as freshwater bacteria and parasites are compatible with human biochemistry. - Saltwater fish is safe, the stuff they're exposed to tends to NOT be compatible with human biochemistry. (and before anyone says "but what about mercury", mercury is a metal, not a bacteria or parasite, and cooking fish does not lower mercury contamination levels)
@@ThinkingCrimson Mercury levels in fish are an issue that needs to be addressed proactively. In other words, stop dumping so much crap into the ocean.
@@ThinkingCrimson Well, that's the thing. There's no real way to remove mercury from fish during preparation. The only ways to extract the mercury would make the fish unsuitable for human consumption due to the introduction of other harmful chemicals.
For those curious, the 'Dark ages' were named so because of the sparse amounts of historical records recovered at the time and less so about christianity causing the decline of intellectualism. Sure, at that time the Roman Empire was collapsing and new kingdoms were being formed but to attribute everything happening in the dark ages to religion, ignoring stuff like politics, disasters and conflict is just irresponsible history.
Fun fact: The Church was actually one of the primary reasons the Dark Ages ended. Not only did the Church work to preserve as much knowledge as possible during the collapse of Western Rome, it was the biggest sponsor and patron of the arts, scientific research, and mathematics research for centuries, and created the foundation of modern science. In fact, a huge percentage of modern scientists and mathematicians are still Christians. Edit: missed a word
5:47 I would like to point out that asthma and allergies if severe enough are ALSO considered a disability under the ADA. However it is to be noted that the allergy must be severe enough to cause breathing issues or anaphylaxis, and the asthma must be causing to tight of a closed throat. I have both asthma and a few severe allergies, including eggs peanuts and tree nuts. I have since been able to tolerate the egg one to a large degree but my peanut one is still incredibly anaphylactic. Allergies are not fake people, ignore what Karen from across the street says about faking for attention because I have ended up in the hospital multiple times
0:41 this is false, it's been proven that abstance does increase testosterone numerous times in peer reviewed studies, but only in the short term, peaking after 7 days and then dropping back to normal levels again. That's why actual medical journals say no *long term* affect, and not no affect at all.
It is not commonly accepted by scholars that Alexander was bisexual. It is commonly stated by a certain type of scholar who happens to not be a historian. There is no period evidence for it. And the closest thing to period evidence is a guy writing a description of an academic debate he and his friends had about 200 years later where one of them tried and failed to convince the others that Alexander was bisexual because he was upset about the death of his childhood friend (which must of course mean they were lovers, right?). The only evidence for sexual or romantic relationships we have regarding Alexander was with women.
@@addison_v_ertisement1678 The actual first place the claim comes from is Plutarch's "Dialogues on love". There's also something that is thought to be a more complete copy of the dialogues in a bit of writing called "The dinner talks" (Deipnosophistae) by Athenaeus of Naucratis. BUT the Deipnosophistae itself is probably not authentic, because it mentions people being involved in the discussions who had died centuries earlier or who would not be born until centuries later who were supposedly conversing with Plutarch. So it is not know what of this editing came before or after and all of the editing of the Deipnosophistae that can be linked to a specific timeframe link it to Plutarch's era (for example it explicitly mentions Plutarch himself as being involved in the discussions, despite them having happened centuries after he died). So there's the likelyhood that the ancient writing was altered to fit a current popular theory. [Edited a bit because I was going from memory when I initially typed it.] And a whole seperate angle to this which is that before the Alexander and Hephastion were lovers angle became popular, another angle (also with no evidence) was the angle that Achilles and Patroclus being lovers (there's absolutely no hint of it in the Illiad itself) and so there was a tendency for the sake of a good story to liken Alexander and Achilles (and so if one was in a romantic relationship with a man then the other one had to be). This is a basic problem with roman histories in general. They're really bad. They were not recorded with any kind of rigor and were altered after they were recorded to fit new societal norms. So they both have no evidence for anything while simultaneously are so vague and patchwork that they can be argued to support anything.
@@theuncalledforseveral reasons, so many I’m shocked this has to be explained to you. 1) animals do not feel romantic attractions like humans do. They form mating pairs based off of instinct and biological need, not emotional or mental need. Therefore, they functionally and inherently do not understand the romantic desires of humans, thus making it wrong to exploit them for it. Simply put, they don’t understand what is being done to them, it’s exploitation. 2) intercourse is not intended to be just whatever is fun, it has biological purpose. If you aren’t the same species as something, you can’t reproduce with it, therefore it’s completely senseless to try. 3) ascribing undue human characteristics to an animal is a sign of mental illness. A person who does so is likely emotionally unstable and mentally disturbed. It’s not normal or healthy for the above reasons to find oneself attracted to an animal, so a person who does is extremely abnormal and unhealthy. 4) circling back to the first reason, exploiting certain animals in such a way can actually damage their psyche, as animals are instinctive beings that can’t adapt to a new activity or habit in the same way a human can. Humans can learn complex behaviors to fit a very different situation that wouldn’t occur naturally, but an animal can’t. They have to be bred to fulfill such a situation, if it’s even possible to do so. So, wholly betraying an animal’s instincts can drive them crazy. Domestic animals usually know you’re not one of them, you’re some kind of authority over them, so they don’t expect that from you. It’s for a very similar reason that beating an animal is bad. It doesn’t understand why you’re doing that to it, it doesn’t know how to respond, so it loses it. Simply put, don’t be a freak. It’s not difficult.
6:35 Farmers are most definitely not in it for profit. While they can have a very high income, a significant amount of that income goes into equipment purchases and repairs, seed, paying workers, and more. Much of the same can be said for ranchers. Source: I grew up in the Nebraska Panhandle. I have lived among and worked for farmers a number of times over the past decade or so. Additionally, my grandfather, whom I live with, has worked at a feedlot as long as I can remember.
@@williambarnes5023 My apologies, I was unclear with my wording. Farmers are generally not in it to get _rich._ It takes a massive operation to turn enough profit to amass a hoard of wealth. This is a big limiting factor for many farmers, especially since farms tend to be generational. Any individual's reasons for farming (or any other job) will vary, but it is generally understood that farming is not conducive to a wealthy lifestyle.
@@JonasGutenwald-yj8th Yes, that's much of what I'm saying. As a matter of principle, the very nature of farming communities tends to discourage such behaviors. Aside from any business aspects, being a money-hungry sum buck only gives you a bad reputation. People around here have long memories, and will think twice about working with you.
"why are so many neurodivergent people getting a diagnose?" "why are so many people coming out as gay?" excuse me, but why do you think so many people are left handed?? Edit: fixed my bad grammar ^
@His_Dark_Materials_fan i can't tell if you're serious or not. in case you're not~ option 1: they are actually born right handed. option 2, white lie: they lie like a gay person in the closet. option 3, dark lie: they were trained to be right handed because of bigots. kinda like how you send gays to anti-gay courses. option 4: handiness is a spectrum and are in a oopa loompa like you, but because being right-handed is "normal", they didn't notice it.
@@wasp795 The amount of left handed people has always remained the same. The reason why it appears that left handed people are increasing is because left handed people are no longer being persecuted for just being left handed and so more people can safely express being left handed. The same is true for queer people and neurodivergent people.
0:22 I mean, there are science experiments using bone marrow. From what I remember. But it's just better to adopt a poor orphan than make a whole new person.
I heard something similar, but again that’s just not how life is meant to work. The reply above me is probably right, so feminists shouldn’t be getting so excited over this.
Like the other two people said, the bone marrow baby thing is a myth. What happened is researchers _looked into it,_ quickly figured out it wouldn’t ever work (because babies need their fathers’ genes as much as their mothers’), and people totally misconstrued it. Someone ran with just the knowledge that it had been investigated briefly and fabricated a myth that it was solid science. It’s not. So yes, at least consider adopting an orphaned or abandoned child if you can’t have kids but want them.
That's a misconception and misinformation, bone marrow does not contain sperm cells, there are claims they are able to make sperm cells from bone marrow... Which is objectively untrue. Stem cells are very different, but no, that's literally just a misunderstanding of basic science. Not really surprising coming from modern day 'feminists,' but regardless.
Pirates would not elect their captains. There is no set thing that pirates did to determine their leadership (because it encompasses too broad a population) but the one thing they did not do is elect their captains because the captains would either be owners, part owners, or trustees of the owner of the ship (ships were massive investments).
Pirates seldom owned their ships. Typically these ships would be either built or stolen. With very few having bought them since Pirates actually were very poor, also, Pirates did technically elect their captains. Methods varied and there was no set method, but essentially it boils down to if the captain is respected or not, because if the captain is not respected then they are overthrown, thus a democracy is better at determining the captain. Also see the source posted in the note for more information
@@JonasGutenwald-yj8th Prove it? You don't even know what you are referring to when you use the word. Let's just assume you mean "the golden age of piracy", which is what most people mean. The piracy in the carribean. Pirate is the colloquial term for "privateers". Privateers were gentlemen explorers with things called "letters of marque" (that is the term in the UK, though each nation had an equivalent) which gave them the authority to take vessels operated under the flag of specific nations (normally those in an active or cold war with the issuing nation) as "prizes", meaning they could then operate the ships themselves or sell them to the issuing nation. They took these vessels by buying their own armed vessels and hiring crew. Which they did with their wealth. They were not elected. They were the rich. Additionally pirates were not poor. They were incredibly wealthy, which was the primary draw for joining or staying on a privateer ship. For every prize the ship took, each crew member would get at least 1 "share" (more senior crewmates got more of course). Because of how valuable ships were, even a thousandth share in a minor prize vessel would be the equivalent of multiple years worth of salary for a normal labourer.
Being proudly obnoxious beats "ackshually" on the annoying scale, and it just so happens that a fair amount of people on Twitter either lie compulsively or are simply unbearable
@@LilacMonarch Well, I'm just guessing here, but I think that note came about because the initial post went out of its way to use some weird term like "birthing parent" instead of just saying "women" or "mothers", like you'd expect. Which doesn't even have the excuse of being something used in the study that was being referenced.
0:22 theoretically, if 2 women could have a child, it actually always would be a girl. If 2 men could have a child it could be a girl or a boy. The More You Know
If they could. But they can't. Which is the entire point. And if 2 men could have a child, it would not be either a girl or a boy. It could also be a third gender that doesn't currently exist with two Y chromosomes.
@giantWario if I remember right, babies with two Y chromosomes don't exist because they aren't viable and always need an X. Considering all the other chromosome combos out there have X chromosomes (a single x, xxy, xxxy). All those combinations are likely going to be sterile or at least infertile.
@@akl2k7 No they don't exist because you need an egg to make a baby and a woman's eggs only have X chromosomes. It's not the chromosome that's necessary, it's the egg. There's no way to tell if a YY baby would be viable or not because there is absolutely no way to *make* a YY baby in the first place. Which is why I said it doesn't currently exist.
Just because a belief is spread far and wide, it doesn't mean it's automatically correct. Not only Alexander the Great was not gay/bisexual, the Spartans weren't either. All of the evidence suggest completely the opposite - they detested homosexuality. The greatest insult in the ancient Greek lands was to call someone gay and, would you know it, all the accusations come from Greeks who hated the Spartans and the Macedonians.
@@olivercharles2930 Well, at some times it was tolerated, at others they would stone, hang or drown gays to death. There were also people who performed sexual acts with boys via pederasty system and many of them were put to death. On the other hand, you do have the Sacred Band of Thebes who were, in fact, mostly gay dudes. But they were the exception. Greeks and Romans were never supportive or understanding towards gays, unlike what we were taught in schools. That was my point.
Also, the tweet never directly states the suspect shot the K9; however, it indeed was ambiguous enough to mislead from the fact local PD shot the SD K9.
Many such cases. There's also been a ton of cases where innocents were shot- only for cops to plant some evidence, or back each other up to claim the victim was actually a threat. Not saying all cops are bad, but worldwide, there are a lot of seeds of corruption within police corpses and it spoils the entire batch fast.
16:00 Any well designed bridge over busy shipping channels WILL have been designed with the possibility of collisions in mind. For example by surrounding the key piers with concrete barrier pilings known as Dolphins. The need for such protective structures for bridge piers over shipping lanes has been well known to US engineering for over 40 years. Ever since the 1980 Sunshine Skyway bridge collapse.
SUBSCRIBE FOR MORE! DROP SOME IDEAS!!!!
.
UK memes??? What do you think?
Music memes :3
CRUSADER MEMES
Gravity falls memes
"Bridges aren't usually designed for a CARGO SHIP to hit them." is so great
i immediately looked for that comment
it's also a lie. most shipping lane bridges have failsafes in place to prevent total collapse of the structure in the event of collision from common traffic within the shipping lane
@@selfdee7754 that depends on your definition of “designed for”
if something is built with failsafes in case an outside force impacts, does that mean it was built for it? Or was it build to have as little damage happen *despite* it.
@@phoebusapollo8365 right up their with the garbage designed FIU pedestrian bridge.
If it hit any other pylon the bridge would probably have stayed up.
Watch the video footage. The ship deliberately steers into the pylon.
"ancient civilizations knew the earth was flat" the egyptians built the pyramids with the earth's curvature in mind, as they have managed to calculate it with pretty good precision using nothing but stone tools and observation
honestly the only flat things in that discussion are the flattards' brains
Eratosthenes, an ancient Greek polymath who worked at the library of Alexandria 2000ya proved the earth was round by using shadows and calculating distances. Aristotle also recognized the earth was spherical a few hundred years before. The Flat earthers are grasping at straws
The reason the world is depicted as flat in the artworks they've made is purely an artistical and metaphorical decision, NOT because they literally thought that the world was actually flat.
Indeed
Its amazing what our ancestors did without all this modern technology
All it was hard work and Deter...i mean PERSISTENCE
I ought to study it up lol
I hate that one dude who keeps trying to spread misinformation that cats can be vegan.
This is animal cruelty.
I own a cat and people saying that shit pisses me off. Don’t try to force your diet on your pet
@SanityTV_Last_Sane_Man_Alive how is that sexism? Could’ve just mistaken the user for a male they weren’t saying the whole male population as a whole they meant the singular person in the video who tries to say cats are vegan. Do you even know proper English?
@SanityTV_Last_Sane_Man_Alive How is that sexist? OP probably mistakenly thought that they are male
@SanityTV_Last_Sane_Man_Alive I use dude and bro gender neutrally.
Everyone's a dude.
And besides, how could i even know their gender solely based on their pfp and online name ?
@SanityTV_Last_Sane_Man_Alive the irony of your username
Community notes are a great way to say “you’re wrong” in the most straightforward way possible while also ratioing the op
Just wait until they get taken away
@@acedelta12the day that happens. The day I give up on humanity
"Cannons are lethal" is a reminder I thought none of us needed
The cause of a lot of the deaths of Napoleon's marshals are cannonballs.
And if anyone thinks they didn't hit anything 99% of the time then I really don't know how to tell them about what artillery teams do.
Puss in Booots can testify to that personal. Travel wasn’t revolutionized.
no no he has a point cannons aren't lethal its the cannon balls that are lethal
@@declansavage519 No the explosive force of a cannon shot can kill you without need for a cannonball assuming you're close enough, and given the right momentum the cannon itself would likely also be incredibly lethal to be hit by.
Community notes are the only reason the entire “community” that uses Twitter isn’t entirely braindead
That happens with free speech and I'm glad we have them to alleviate the sad reality of lies hidden in plain sight.
@@sebagab9795 It's not free speech, only one message is visible and the average user has no say in what the message says.
And X only benefits from them because bad actors can still block anyone that even slightly challenges them or limit who can reply, but they can't do a thing about the notes.
Even then, it's only a net good until people figure out how to exploit the "diversity of perspectives" system the way they do with the algorithm.
@@LuciusC Being able to block people you don't like is part of the right to privacy policy.
You have a right to disregard people you don't want to listen to.
Community notes are most of the time for us, not the person who made the post.
@@sebagab9795 Well you're technically correct. Currently when a community note calls someone a "turbo-n**ce" that's a feature, yet if I do it in the replies it's a violation of their privacy and they have a right to disregard me, preventing me from making any future posts against them. Oh, and on sites like this even that first post will get hidden if the overlords detect a naughty word.
That isn't free speech, that's elite speech.
@@LuciusC If you replied to them and then got blocked by them, you didn't lose free speech, you're just being ignored.
Also, Twitter* Referring to that cesspool with the name that sounds like a porn site is stupid ong 🤣
the funniest part of XQC's "sister" one is that twitter thinks bleached hair is genetic
I still remember that Facebook post "i'll dye my hair blonde so my kid can have a precious blonde hair when she is born"
My hair looks similar to his.. i have never bleached or dyed it.
Bur I'm the only person i know with hair that light
There actually is a genetic condition where your hair turns gray in youth. One of my great relatives had it. Completely different from thinking bleaching your hair is hereditable ofc, but still.
@@Tree_-wp5zn But doubt you have dark roots
@@zeriel9148 Entirely different situation than what they're talking about but still, maybe someone learned from this. I knew one that had what looked like pure white hair naturally, he was also on the paler side skinwise, so pretty sure he was born with some kind of deficiency.
I'd kill to have natural hair like that dude had though. I really liked it.
3:25 this guys whole argument falls apart when you take into consideration that cannons usually are not aimed at people, but structures (some exceptions, especially grape shot)
I’ll say it again because kids these days don’t understand the horror of war the cannon was aimed at the ground so it would skip along the ground ripping off limbs which is effective but the real effect comes from not the guy who guys splattered but the 20 guys who get their friend splattered on them and the psychological effect of having to clean up chunks of your fellows after the battle it raises the cost of fighting it’s a psychological weapon and an attrition weapon primarily
@@nothanks9503 yeah, that just adds more to it
@crackedmaskyeah, but I wouldn’t be surprised if some people actually think that way
@@nothanks9503The psychological effects do not inhibit one ability to aim a gun or swing a sword. Did you know that skipping cannon balls on the ground seldom took off limbs and instead would trip people over or kill one person who would stop the impact. Cannons are designed to be aimed at buildings, but they also have munitions designed for infantry.
@@JonasGutenwald-yj8th The psychological effects do absolutely effect your ability to aim a gun and align a sword swing you lose fine motor skills when under the effects of stress hormones they help you take damage and keep moving not necessarily keep you in top fighting shape
Cats WILL eat meat! They will LITERALLY hunt to find it.
I'd bet good money their cat has done so behind their backs.
i think the notion behind obligate carnivores is that they MUST eat meat, but it seems that felines are obligate carnivores because they can't convert carotene into vitamin A ... so if you supplement Vit A it may be possible for felines to survive without consuming liver or other animal products but i don't know for sure .
if it turns out felines just require supplementation to be vegan then that's cool and i wouldn't fault a cat owner for trying .
@@someguy79 Please don't run unscientific experiments on your pets.
The idea may sound plausible but the average vegan doesn't know when to give up, and definitely don't have the equipment for monitoring health adequately in the first place. And they won't use a control group at home either, so it's pretty meaningless.
@@LuciusC i should've said i wouldn't fault a cat owner for investigating the possibility further , and a million other caveats ...
firstly, i do not own a cat and do not condone practices that may endanger the health of any human or nonhuman animal .
secondly, and to reiterate, i was suggesting it may be _possible_ based on a two second google .
thirdly, i absolutely agree with you regarding proper safety and scientific rigor , and upon further reading, cats would require even more supplementation than humans in order to maintain a meatless diet ...
and i wouldn't do that to any cat .
lastly, i have a dog and i feed her mostly unsalted lean chicken and veggies i know she likes .
thank you for the reply
so, upon further reading, felines require pretty heavy supplementation (not just Vit A but also taurine and arginine, Vit D, and something called arachidonic acid , and maybe more) to be vegan and it can cause health problems for them like UTIs so you have to test their urine.
and that's assuming you can get them to eat the plant food with vitamins and stuff in it ...
yeah, i wouldn't put a cat or person through any of that.
so it turns out it may be POSSIBLE but i cannot agree with pet owners forcing a meatless diet on their felines due to the health risks alone .
3:20 dont forget that almost every weapon is MADE to KILL
What do you mean almost? Perhaps display?
@@Friendly-Neighborhood-Asexual id imagine some non lethal stuff is considered a weapon (I may just be dumb idk)
@@Marder_IFV No that might make sense.
@@Friendly-Neighborhood-Asexual maybe ritualistic weapons. The swords used to knight people in GB aren’t sharpened as far as I know.
Almost every weapon is not made to kill in fact. The majority are made just for people to own and to have fun with (ie plinking for bang sticks, HEMA for poky sticks, etc.)
The idea that every weapon (by which you mean gun) is designed to kill is looking at the intent behind the original designs for that type of weapon, in which case almost everything you own was designed to kill or facilitate killing, including whatever you typed this message on, because that is how we work as a species.
11:15 I find it funny that this post used a poster image of Sousou no Frieren (aka Frieren: Beyond Journey's End) despite the fact that it isn't an isekai anime, just a regular fantasy anime.
Which is probably why it was noted.
@@deathcon6261Why didn't they note that Frieren wasn't an isekai instead of arguing the definition of isekai?
@@marcobering3945 Probably because it is common for none anime watchers to think Isekai is synonymous with the fantasy genre (also the article likely mentions it as well).
Because the article stupidly quotes a Japanese streaming claiming that "isekai" is anything that takes place in a world other than our own. They misunderstand the context of the word isekai as a genre and claim people are using the word wrong, believing it means "another world" from the viewer's perspective even though as a genre isekai is defined as "another world" from the protagonists perspective.
@@raziel710 because all the other worlds are a copy paste from a generic DnD template, that's why
"Cannons aren't lethal" that person needs to rewatch Kung Fu Panda 2
That person needs to do a lot of things 😂
Gun control advocates are necessarily ignorant.
@@Alkron1 Some things over here, some things over there, and some things way, way, way over there by that wall.
@@thecrimsoncommando3875 😂😂
That person clearly needs to learn about execution history.
3:18 They're conflating accuracy with lethality. Just because something is less likely to hit you, doesn't mean it can't kill you.
Clearly if I stand in front of this cannon here, I only have a 1% chance to die...
Lightning is super inaccurate. But if it hits you, it will most likely kill you.
Not to mention people have died to cannons before 💀
The abundance of XCOM players shows that most people don't understand that low chance doesn't mean impossible.
Except for the RP enjoyers, those just roll with it.
Also, a cannon doesn't have to hit you to kill you. If it hits the ground near you, the impact throws rock fragments and debris at high speeds all around like a grenade.
11:24 the worst part is Sousou no Frieren is not an Isekai. It is just a regular fantasy story. No reincarnation, no teleporting into the world, just a near immortal elf's journey to meet the ghost of the human who changed her life.
If enough time has passed between then and now, it could still count. Changing worlds doesn't have to mean you were the one that moved. The world could move instead.
@@williambarnes5023 That is a fair point. The series does go to some pretty great lengths to show how much has changed in the 80 years since the Hero's Party ended their 10 year journey.
and how much has changed in the 1,000+ years Frieren has lived.
But at the end of the day, no anime site in their right mind is tagging Frieren as an Isekai.
Because the article stupidly quotes a Japanese streaming claiming that "isekai" is anything that takes place in a world other than our own. They misunderstand the context of the word isekai as a genre and claim people are using the word wrong, believing it means "another world" from the viewer's perspective even though as a genre isekai is defined as "another world" from the protagonists perspective.
@@williambarnes5023 In that case my life is an isekai too. God, no wonder the plot is so boring.
@@williambarnes5023 It's not isekai if the world develops (or undevelops) around the character in the period of a set amount of years. That's just how life works. lol
Man, community notes are made by absolute SAVAGES.
Smart SAVAGES
@@Ray_cyst_officialDefinitely not smart.
@@Ray_cyst_official sometimes a bit autistic if anything
Misinformation is one thing but they're "correcting" obvious jokes and memes too
Smart SAVAGES stopping the spread misinformation 🎉
Not really savage in my opinion, just regular people who actually this wonderful thing basic common sense... honestly, I haven't watched these kind of video in a very long time so I'm fortunate enough not to have to deal with this crap. Fr, some of these people are either opportunistic who try to make money by spreading misinformation, or they are actually THAT freaking stupid. Thank god I Don't use twitter or x or whatever the hell it's supposed to be called .
The good part of the internet is it gives everyone a voice and allows people of all kinds to meet and find eachother.
The bad part of the internet is it gives EVERYONR a voice and allows people of ALL kinds to meet and find eachother.
The good side of democracy is everyone can vote
The bad side of democracy is everyone can vote
That’s only a good thing. Just because people are downright stupid doesn’t mean we should take away their freedom of speech.
I hope you know that each other is not one word.
That last one about autism reminds me of a response I read to a similar post years ago.
To paraphrase:
“Mount Everest wasn’t discovered until 1856, but I’m pretty sure the damn mountain was still there!”
I've seen the same thing but instead it's with the discovery of Pluto
@@namikkou it was discovered in 1930 but it was there for longer than we have been here!
2:13 ugh. I don't care if ppl are vegan. I'm Indian, basically most of my relatives are either vegetarian or vegan. I hate vegans who feel the need to feel superior for it and impose it on everyone else. Srsly, refusing to feed an obligate carnivore meat is animal abuse.
As a vegetarian I agree so much bro. My dad is like the biggest meat eater to ever eat meat in history and I'm fine with him.
I eat meat.
I have a friend who is vegan.
We never have any trouble with that.
How?
We respect each other's decision.
He is religious.
I am not.
We never have any trouble with that.
How?
We respect each other's decision.
B12 cannot be obtained from vegan diet and it is vital.
A vegan who is healthy is not really honest about being vegan.
@@Conserpov We have pills to give us all the nutrients we need
@@Conserpov We have pills to give us all the nutrients we need
So glad Twitter has community notices now.
This should help a lot combating missinformation.
The cannon one made me laugh, so cannons are non lethal because they aren’t likely to hit people? Well, they do seem pretty darn lethal if they blew a big hole out through your torso.
and even if we're defining lethality as the probability of getting killed by one rather than its potential to kill, the cannonball doesn't need to hit you to kill you. if it blows a hole in something next to you, you're probably gonna get killed by the shrapnel
Not to mention, cannons aren’t meant to be shot at a person. They’re meant to be shot at structures. Trust me, the people in said structures aren’t going to be getting out in one piece after a cannon shot. And if we’re talking about likelihood of death from a machine, ban cars before guns. Cars kill far more people than guns do. Really, most machines are incredibly effective at inflicting death. What about ships? Rollercoasters? Airplanes? Factory equipment? Farming equipment? That guy’s a dunce.
@@DannyDevitoOffical-TrustMeBro While all true, this isn't even the reasoning behind the guy in the vid's rant about cannons.
He said cannons should be banned because they AREN'T lethal...
So this guy is probably one of those NRA simp gun-nuts that think less powerful fire-arms should be banned because it increases the chances of him dying if he ever gets attacked by his many imaginary political enemies.
He's still wrong, regardless, but now he's wrong on MULTIPLE levels. How great.
X-COM: "The shot has a 1% chance to hit you"
Player: "Yes"
X-COM: "So it CAN hit"
Player: "Makes sense to me"
X-COM: "Your character just died from it"
Player: "HOW DID THAT HIT!? This game is BS!"
@@rompevuevitos222 the Archon King can get its wings torn from its body in the thousand Hells
For the bit all the way at the end there. IIrc, the term autism was first coined in 1912, though back then it was believed to be a side symptom of schizophrenia. It wasn't until the late 1940s that it was recognized as its own. Obviously that didn't stop people form being misdiagnosed though. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong though.
Honestly you're really close! 😊. The only differences is that it was 1911 not 1912, and it was the 50's not the 40's. And then it completely swapped meaning in the 1970's lol. Good job though! you didn't spread anything bad-- but a neat topic I was interested to learn about!
@@scrublordgamer9636 Dang. I was close though and got to learn so I'm counting this as W
that's a W mindset
@@Sunny-Bunny7567W
Also, part of the increase in documented cases of autism is the fact that autism was much harder to diagnose in girls, so a lot of high-functioning autistic girls were going undiagnosed.
2:13 The fact that cats are sometimes forced into a plant-based diet by their vegan owners makes me sad😢
If I still posted on twitter, every time I saw a vegan forcing their awful diet onto an obligate carnivore I'd want to tweet them a video of a cow eating a rodent/bird and tell them the universe is trying to balance out their selfishness.
@SanityTV_Last_Sane_Man_Alive Cats are meant to be carnivores
@SanityTV_Last_Sane_Man_Alive You know, making a strawman of "Yeah well cats face worse :(" Doesnt really make sense here. If you can prevent deaths by malnutrition, you should. Its not as though properly feeding a cat denies the opportunity for other improvements to their lives. Please quit trying to sympathize with an animal abuser.
@SanityTV_Last_Sane_Man_Alive Murd*r is worse that r*pe SO we shouldn't punish the r*pe víctims as Bad
Basically what you're saying with cats
@SanityTV_Last_Sane_Man_AliveNo
The one person who is talking about cats having a plant based diet:
You should never be aloud to have a pet of any kind because that is animal cruelty.
Cats are carnivores, the extent of their plant-eating is grass and they only do that to help with digestion.
allowed*
for the isekai: the picture was from an anime that is not an isekai.
Because the article stupidly quotes a Japanese streamer claiming that "isekai" is anything that takes place in a world other than our own. They misunderstand the context of the word isekai as a genre and claim people are using the word wrong, believing it means "another world" from the viewer's perspective even though as a genre isekai is defined as "another world" from the protagonists perspective.
@@raziel710 bot
@@tovarishchfeixiao What are you talking about? I'm a bot because I copy pasted my response instead of typing a custom reply to every person that is confused by the same thing without actually looking at the article?
@@raziel710 There are bugs inside my skin, I must rip it out
@@gatoreptiliano8785 Yeah... i must rip my skin off...
The bugs, theyre speaking to me..
I must get this skin off.
16:04 I love this random Pokémon roleplay meme, especially with the music he uses
Its also kinda confusing, we see at the start that the player is wearing modern clothing and is heavily implied to be from the future with their proficiency with poke balls, i don't get the note unless its talking specifically about the rival character which makes no sence becuase why would they?
Pretty sure it's a go back in time marry your grandma become your grandpa situation
Community Notes is honestly the best thing to ever happen to Twitter
Val i had dream of you narrating a meme saying" you ain't burger enough to ride the hot dog rollercoaster because you will be savaged" and you did vlog there riding the hot dog rollercoaster
🤣🤣🤣WHAT LOL
As one does
I read this comment in his voice
I feel like my braincells are dying from watching all these tweets.
Same😭
same but I regain a bit from community notes retorts
@@jonharrison3114 They don't help much because most of the time, they state the obvious because the original tweet was THAT dumb.
that’s because they are dying
?
the amount of misinformation on the internet is truly scary
Most wrong information is the one shared on social media or news websites.
Finding proper factual information takes some more reading and time, which most people don't care for or have time for.
You'd be baffled how many just build their opinions on only reading a headline, not even the entire article.
1:11 Fun Fact: The ancient Greeks knew that the Earth is round, same with the ancient Egyptians.
Funnily enough if you google "Did the vikings believe earth was flat" the first google results state
"The early ancient Greeks, Sumerians, Babylonians, Egyptians and Vikings all believed that the Earth was a flat disc or plane surrounded by water."
Bit of a loaded statement but there's very little evidence that even the Vikings would believe the Earth was flat, if they cared at all as the Norse faith structure saw their world as part of a larger world on the World Tree rather than a planet nor particularly cared for explaining where the tree starts or ends.
@@Lewtable Incredible that one of the most rough living civilizations, the one which didn't really care about "planets", is smarter than a flat earther.
I like how many community notes are essentially:
Tweet: This thing happened and it is horrible!
Community notes: This thing did not happen. Wikipedia link.
Community notes are literally the last thread holding that site together
Is it just me or are the shorter notes the best ones
"No."
"No."
"Cannons are lethal"
community notes a savage
COMMUNITY NOTE: *are*
no, just common sense
Yep.
i swear this is commented under every video this guy makes on community posts
@@eliproductions8507
Common sense can often be very savage towards those who don't have it.
Saying someone is faking a blindfolded run is also not misogyny
What I want to know is why that person thinks there's something wrong with being straight. Do they think straight= homophobic?
at this rate in 2050 it'll be illegal to be straight
Yes. They think sexuality is a choice, and that you chose wrong, because you're bigoted against homosexuality, and sexuality isn't a choice.
They also just hate bi people
I think it's connected to how some people think someone is "faking being bisexual" when they have an opposite gender partner
Eh,speaking as a bi gal, there are those who just hate the thought of bi people and can't fathom that there is something else than being just gay or just straight. All gay otherwise you are a fake and traitor to the community. There are always toxic people in every community.
16:40 And in the book Anne literally writes that she got a fountain pen and she loves it 😭
4:01 strictly speaking, the grail in question didn’t belong to Jesus but the wealthy person who hosted the Last Supper. It was also the fancy cup traditionally set out for Elijah during Passover. So, probably not that fancy, but probably not a simple clay cup either.
It is also not real, like Excalibur and the Golden Arrow, because Jesus was a fictional composite figure, like King Arthur and Robin Hood.
I mean, if we really want to get into the details, the concept of the Holy Grail as this powerful magical lost item is entirely extra-Biblical folklore. In the text itself, nothing suggests it was ever anything more than just a cup Jesus drank from and used to demonstrate the sacramental wine. So, even if the Bible were real, the “Holy Grail” wouldn’t be. So . . . there’s a LOT of meta levels we could pick through here.
@@williambarnes5023epople cannot prove or deny that
@@williambarnes5023I mean we don’t have a ton of records about him but nearly all modern scholars believe he really existed
@@capadociaash8003Well of course they do. Nearly al modern scholars are Christians. They won't let a little thing like the actual records indicating that the Cult of Cristus was a group of individuals similar to BLM or Antifa get in the way of rewriting history to support their religious beliefs.
14:00
There is a MASSIVE difference between 30 and 60 fps. But if they compared 60 to 120 It would at least be reasonable.
But I do agree that 30 plays "fine" as it is the bare minimum for any hand eye coordination skill based games.
Dude it’s a noticeable difference between 60 fps and 40 fps when I play Minecraft.
I grew up playing at 30, so I'm perhaps a little biased, but it's absolutely acceptable in anything but competitive/high-reaction-time games. Of course that's only true if 30 is your _target_ fps; if you're expecting to play at 60 (or higher) and it drops down to 30, that's a different story.
Would I prefer to play at 60? Yeah, obviously. But that doesn't mean it's unplayable, or even really _that_ bad once you can acclimate to it
For me, 60 looks way better, but 30 is good enough. But it depends on the game and person.
@@Bubbly_Dragon i would say that 30 is fine on most games that isnt an fps or have ranked matches
Indeed
30fps is Slow but its still runnable
Heck this video on lower quality is running 30fps!
And it runs fine!
Anyone who posts anything that say "love knows no species/age" should go directly to prison forever.
I love my cat so much :D
@AetherrMCfamilial or amorous? if amorous, go directly to jail, do not collect 200$
The amount of people straight up lying on twitter to get interactions is concerning. Do they feel no remorse for spreading misinformation?
Money.
"remorse" 💀 You're saying that as if it were some very seriously crime.
@@tovarishchfeixiao ...do you think remorse can only exist for crime? People can feel remorse for accidentally stepping on an ant, remorse is not exclusive to doing crime
no, because its hilarious.
If you're too stupid to verify something, that isn't anyone else's fault but you're own
community notes are the start of the internet becoming populated with people that have the study/research skills of a kindergartner
@@tovarishchfeixiaolying is worse than stealing. change my mind >:) id rather lose my legs than find out my marriage was a sham.
Actually, they usually build fenders around bridge structures to prevent collision from causing catastrophic failure.
Ya it's more of a prevent small collision type thing, not full tilt head on. Bridges would be astronomically more expensive and not even possible to build if they were built that way.
But they do have some measures in place you are 100% right
I read somewhere that the fenders here were too small to prevent the damage done by this big boat and bigger fenders could have prevented this. This is likely because the fenders were built with the bridge in a period of time where the boating traffic there was on average with significantly smaller vessels, and they never considered "updating it" for the increase in the size of traffic there. Not sure if that is true though, but it may have been. The US does struggle a bit with updating and upkeeping some vital infrastructure in certain states.
We need community notes outside of X (formerly known as Twitter) on everything from as seen on tv products, to news channels and especially politicians and they should be forced to respond to them in real time.
"Straight Bisexual and Gay Bisexual"
Whattttt? That dosen't.. make any sense. I don't... what?
_The whole point of being Bi is that we're BOTH._
Edit: What the heck did I just stew up in my replies tho
But isn't bisexuals usually have a specific gender that they prefer to be with more than the other tho? And from that perspective, it kinda could make sense if you refer to the preferences.
(note: i used "gender" because i don't want youtube to delete my comment for using the other word)
@@tovarishchfeixiaoNo, some do but not all. And their perspective is insanity and tribalism, they're full of hatred and heterophobia, no better than homophobes. Saying all this as someone that's bi with more same-s*x experience
@@tovarishchfeixiaoNo. They're no better than the homophobes.
@@tovarishchfeixiaoShort answer: hell no, don't defend them
i dont wanna argue or anything so this isn't meant as aggressive but in LGBTQ history (especially lesbians), people who identified as bi and something for whatever reason tend to be accepted in non-exclusionist spaces. Same with trans men who call themselves lesbians. Any gay/lesbian/bi people (including me) I've actually met irl don't really care lol. its a weird complex thing to get into. and @burnttoast26, please do some more research instead of just assuming it's homophobic. thanks
"Children should not be playing GTA6!"
No shit. I want to know where on earth this person got the impression that any game in the Grand Theft Auto franchise was meant to be played by children. Don't tell me this is one of those people who believe that all video games are meant for children.
Yes, video-games had a childhood audience in mind hence why children play it. It is wrong to make games like that anyway.
@@johnnotrealname8168Dude, children literally can’t play the game without parents buying it for them. And it’s not wrong to make those types of games you dunce 💀
@@johnnotrealname8168No.
Since the ATARI period, adult games were being made.
@@brunocamposquenaoeoyoutuber I never made that claim.
@johnnotrealname8168 video games were invented for adults
I love community post for now they are actually correcting the things that need too be corrected.
I always imagine Community Notes as a guy with glasses and a deadpan voice, sighing at the start of every sentence as they correct someone
So when they say stuff like, 15:42, 16:05, 17:47, and 18:50 it cracks me up
im gonna start thinking of community notes as him now
I love when the community notes are just no. Like imagine being so wrong that they don't need any explanation for why you're wrong
12:12 'expanding the very same programs that started the problem to begin with' GREAT
16:18 as a Pokémon fan, this one made me nearly die with laughter.
How the fuck is a cannon not lethal?
6:08 The community note is just wrong itself. Alexander the Great was, in fact, not gay or bi. Him being upset when his friend died being taken out of context is the only thing there is for proof.
I'm confused as to why he left this in the video, for it is rather well known that this is historical revisionism.
Alexander the great was most likely gay or bi so you are wrong.
7:54 Tbf it doesn’t state who shot the dog.
Community notes are meant to provide missing context, because the biggest deception is often the choice of narrative made by picking which facts to report and how to spin them. If it doesn't state who shot the dog, the most likely candidate would be the suspects, not the cops. Community notes provided the missing context and exposed the real story.
0:31 I like how with this one they try to make it seem normal in the first two panels. It's fine to have an animal as a best friend and my mom considers her dogs my siblings (ok that one might be weird) but the last guy is just a straight up zoophile.
My aunt considered her dog a child and sibling to my cousins (to the point he aparently recived more atention than her own children). She only realised that when the dog died.
Why do you think we get so much representation in kids cartoons now?
Considering They are pushing to make...adult activities with animals...and minors...legal......
Yes. They really are. (LookIntoWhatTheyCall"AgeGapLove")
@@lightborn9071 we?? You need Jesus.
@@racingraptor4758 Those types are insufferable and need help.
1:12 Ancient cultures believed that the Earth was flat, and that the Sun and Moon travelled under it when not in the sky. Never a Sun nor Moon circling above. Also, several of those came to the realization that the Earth is a globe.
Didn't the ancient Norse Vikings think the world was flat until a few of the raiders came back and was like "Yeah. So uh, we sailed around the world, it's a giant ball." Or am I thinking of something else?
Also, several cultures figured out the earth was a globe because when they were building, they realized that the earth was slightly curved, so they had to take into account that curvature.
@@TinyDragonGamer250No medieval Scandinavian ever completed a circumnavigation. The Spanish did it first in 1522.
Also, most of those beliefs were based either on superstitions (refusing to investigate further the matter) or the fact that they only had knowledge of its territory and a couple of kilometers beyond.
For example, the fact that if people search maps of the time and not single one mentions America is very telling of their view and its validation
0:56 well... that's surely escalated quick
That escalated EXPONENTIALLY
@@Blue_Cubes_silly_animations that escalated .1 nanoseconds
6:20 "There are two spiritual dangers in not owning a farm. One is the danger of supposing that breakfast comes from the grocery, and the other that heat comes from the furnace." - Aldo Leopold, A Sand County Almanac, 1949
2:55 - Just a bit of clarification on this, raw meats _can_ contain diseases such as salmonella, but the actual risk of that depends on the particular type of meat, where it's sourced from, how it's prepared and whether it's _raw_ raw or cured. Some examples:
- In Japan, Torisashi (chicken sashimi, made with very thinly sliced raw chicken breast) is a delicacy, but the sourced chicken HAS to be raised and prepared in pristine conditions for it to be safe to eat. Chicken from an American factory farm is WAY out of the question.
- It's generally not a good idea to eat truly raw pork. However, many forms of cured ham are _technically_ raw but cured with salt, which helps kill bacteria.
- Beef is usually a lot safer. You still want to exercise caution but the chances of getting sick from raw beef are only slightly higher than raw _saltwater_ fish.
- Freshwater fish has to be cooked, as freshwater bacteria and parasites are compatible with human biochemistry.
- Saltwater fish is safe, the stuff they're exposed to tends to NOT be compatible with human biochemistry. (and before anyone says "but what about mercury", mercury is a metal, not a bacteria or parasite, and cooking fish does not lower mercury contamination levels)
So how can you reduce the mercury levels on a fish?
@@ThinkingCrimson
Mercury levels in fish are an issue that needs to be addressed proactively. In other words, stop dumping so much crap into the ocean.
@@VestedUTuber i meant when you are gonna eat a fish. But thats a valid argument.
@@ThinkingCrimson
Well, that's the thing. There's no real way to remove mercury from fish during preparation. The only ways to extract the mercury would make the fish unsuitable for human consumption due to the introduction of other harmful chemicals.
@@VestedUTuber well shit.
8:34 that whole "support without proof" thing made the logical side of my brain have a panic attack, imagine what could happen!
It had happened on previous dramas. (For example, Dream)
2:20
“I dEbUnkEd tHiS”
(Gets debunked again)
When you know this person euthanized their own cat because they ate their hamster (the cat was according to that person "vegan")...
For those curious, the 'Dark ages' were named so because of the sparse amounts of historical records recovered at the time and less so about christianity causing the decline of intellectualism.
Sure, at that time the Roman Empire was collapsing and new kingdoms were being formed but to attribute everything happening in the dark ages to religion, ignoring stuff like politics, disasters and conflict is just irresponsible history.
A lot of things were made up during the Renaissance to make themselves feel smarter than their ancestors.
Fun fact: The Church was actually one of the primary reasons the Dark Ages ended. Not only did the Church work to preserve as much knowledge as possible during the collapse of Western Rome, it was the biggest sponsor and patron of the arts, scientific research, and mathematics research for centuries, and created the foundation of modern science.
In fact, a huge percentage of modern scientists and mathematicians are still Christians.
Edit: missed a word
Doesn't really work like that but sure
5:47 I would like to point out that asthma and allergies if severe enough are ALSO considered a disability under the ADA. However it is to be noted that the allergy must be severe enough to cause breathing issues or anaphylaxis, and the asthma must be causing to tight of a closed throat. I have both asthma and a few severe allergies, including eggs peanuts and tree nuts. I have since been able to tolerate the egg one to a large degree but my peanut one is still incredibly anaphylactic. Allergies are not fake people, ignore what Karen from across the street says about faking for attention because I have ended up in the hospital multiple times
saying that cats can thrive on a plant-based diet is like saying dinosaurs could survive on a rock-based diet
0:41 this is false, it's been proven that abstance does increase testosterone numerous times in peer reviewed studies, but only in the short term, peaking after 7 days and then dropping back to normal levels again.
That's why actual medical journals say no *long term* affect, and not no affect at all.
Still incorrect. Stop defending nofap. There's no science behind it.
Did you make a spelling error?
It also increases after 5 minutes of watching Baki.
It is not commonly accepted by scholars that Alexander was bisexual. It is commonly stated by a certain type of scholar who happens to not be a historian. There is no period evidence for it. And the closest thing to period evidence is a guy writing a description of an academic debate he and his friends had about 200 years later where one of them tried and failed to convince the others that Alexander was bisexual because he was upset about the death of his childhood friend (which must of course mean they were lovers, right?).
The only evidence for sexual or romantic relationships we have regarding Alexander was with women.
I need to know this "historians" name.
@@addison_v_ertisement1678 Same could be said about the claims that he was. Anything can be fabricated from history
@@yellercat500cat7What the hell do you mean?
@@addison_v_ertisement1678 The actual first place the claim comes from is Plutarch's "Dialogues on love". There's also something that is thought to be a more complete copy of the dialogues in a bit of writing called "The dinner talks" (Deipnosophistae) by Athenaeus of Naucratis. BUT the Deipnosophistae itself is probably not authentic, because it mentions people being involved in the discussions who had died centuries earlier or who would not be born until centuries later who were supposedly conversing with Plutarch. So it is not know what of this editing came before or after and all of the editing of the Deipnosophistae that can be linked to a specific timeframe link it to Plutarch's era (for example it explicitly mentions Plutarch himself as being involved in the discussions, despite them having happened centuries after he died). So there's the likelyhood that the ancient writing was altered to fit a current popular theory.
[Edited a bit because I was going from memory when I initially typed it.]
And a whole seperate angle to this which is that before the Alexander and Hephastion were lovers angle became popular, another angle (also with no evidence) was the angle that Achilles and Patroclus being lovers (there's absolutely no hint of it in the Illiad itself) and so there was a tendency for the sake of a good story to liken Alexander and Achilles (and so if one was in a romantic relationship with a man then the other one had to be).
This is a basic problem with roman histories in general. They're really bad. They were not recorded with any kind of rigor and were altered after they were recorded to fit new societal norms. So they both have no evidence for anything while simultaneously are so vague and patchwork that they can be argued to support anything.
@@jimmydesouza4375 Thanks!
0:55 I’M SORRY?!?!!?!??!
That escalated quickly
0:30 honestly The only love you should have with your pets is Familial or platonic
Because they CAN consent to that love
Not anything else though
Yarp!
Why?
@@theuncalledforseveral reasons, so many I’m shocked this has to be explained to you.
1) animals do not feel romantic attractions like humans do. They form mating pairs based off of instinct and biological need, not emotional or mental need. Therefore, they functionally and inherently do not understand the romantic desires of humans, thus making it wrong to exploit them for it. Simply put, they don’t understand what is being done to them, it’s exploitation.
2) intercourse is not intended to be just whatever is fun, it has biological purpose. If you aren’t the same species as something, you can’t reproduce with it, therefore it’s completely senseless to try.
3) ascribing undue human characteristics to an animal is a sign of mental illness. A person who does so is likely emotionally unstable and mentally disturbed. It’s not normal or healthy for the above reasons to find oneself attracted to an animal, so a person who does is extremely abnormal and unhealthy.
4) circling back to the first reason, exploiting certain animals in such a way can actually damage their psyche, as animals are instinctive beings that can’t adapt to a new activity or habit in the same way a human can. Humans can learn complex behaviors to fit a very different situation that wouldn’t occur naturally, but an animal can’t. They have to be bred to fulfill such a situation, if it’s even possible to do so. So, wholly betraying an animal’s instincts can drive them crazy. Domestic animals usually know you’re not one of them, you’re some kind of authority over them, so they don’t expect that from you. It’s for a very similar reason that beating an animal is bad. It doesn’t understand why you’re doing that to it, it doesn’t know how to respond, so it loses it.
Simply put, don’t be a freak. It’s not difficult.
@@theuncalledfor because they don't understand romantic love
But empathic love is universal
@@theuncalledfor A dog cannot even talk to you and you want to @#£% it?
I love the fact that community notes are like that one ‘Erm Actually’ kid we had in high school half the time but we love them
all the silly people aside, the cooking mama music later in the video had me genuinely happy LOL
6:35 Farmers are most definitely not in it for profit. While they can have a very high income, a significant amount of that income goes into equipment purchases and repairs, seed, paying workers, and more. Much of the same can be said for ranchers.
Source: I grew up in the Nebraska Panhandle. I have lived among and worked for farmers a number of times over the past decade or so. Additionally, my grandfather, whom I live with, has worked at a feedlot as long as I can remember.
Yes, farmers are in it for profit. Literally every person... who has a job... is in it for profit. That's what jobs are.
@@williambarnes5023 My apologies, I was unclear with my wording. Farmers are generally not in it to get _rich._ It takes a massive operation to turn enough profit to amass a hoard of wealth. This is a big limiting factor for many farmers, especially since farms tend to be generational.
Any individual's reasons for farming (or any other job) will vary, but it is generally understood that farming is not conducive to a wealthy lifestyle.
Typically commercial farmers aren’t scumbags that chase cash at every given opportunity. It’s fine
@@JonasGutenwald-yj8th Yes, that's much of what I'm saying. As a matter of principle, the very nature of farming communities tends to discourage such behaviors. Aside from any business aspects, being a money-hungry sum buck only gives you a bad reputation. People around here have long memories, and will think twice about working with you.
Can confirm.
"why are so many neurodivergent people getting a diagnose?"
"why are so many people coming out as gay?"
excuse me, but why do you think so many people are left handed??
Edit: fixed my bad grammar ^
@His_Dark_Materials_fan i can't tell if you're serious or not. in case you're not~
option 1: they are actually born right handed.
option 2, white lie: they lie like a gay person in the closet.
option 3, dark lie: they were trained to be right handed because of bigots. kinda like how you send gays to anti-gay courses.
option 4: handiness is a spectrum and are in a oopa loompa like you, but because being right-handed is "normal", they didn't notice it.
what does this mean
@@wasp795 The amount of left handed people has always remained the same. The reason why it appears that left handed people are increasing is because left handed people are no longer being persecuted for just being left handed and so more people can safely express being left handed. The same is true for queer people and neurodivergent people.
@@rithvikmuthyalapati9754 thank you that helped me understand the comment
@@rithvikmuthyalapati9754 thank you for answering. I couldn't have done it better while I was asleep or even when I wasn't. :-)
This logic they use for the holy grail often makes it sound like Jesus brought his own grail from home
community notes are the one saving grace for twitter
"Cannons aren't even lethal!"
Grapeshot: "Am I a joke to you?"
9:18 I have a feeling this is a parody
I couldn't stop laughing at the rhode island one, the poster has freedomfan69 as their @
I love how happy you sound on your videos nowadays. These surely make my days 😊
0:22 I mean, there are science experiments using bone marrow. From what I remember.
But it's just better to adopt a poor orphan than make a whole new person.
If I remember right those weren’t fully true and the scientist behind it was very dubious.
I heard something similar, but again that’s just not how life is meant to work. The reply above me is probably right, so feminists shouldn’t be getting so excited over this.
Like the other two people said, the bone marrow baby thing is a myth. What happened is researchers _looked into it,_ quickly figured out it wouldn’t ever work (because babies need their fathers’ genes as much as their mothers’), and people totally misconstrued it. Someone ran with just the knowledge that it had been investigated briefly and fabricated a myth that it was solid science. It’s not.
So yes, at least consider adopting an orphaned or abandoned child if you can’t have kids but want them.
"Making a whole new person." idk why, but that grossed me out
That's a misconception and misinformation, bone marrow does not contain sperm cells, there are claims they are able to make sperm cells from bone marrow... Which is objectively untrue. Stem cells are very different, but no, that's literally just a misunderstanding of basic science. Not really surprising coming from modern day 'feminists,' but regardless.
Pirates would not elect their captains. There is no set thing that pirates did to determine their leadership (because it encompasses too broad a population) but the one thing they did not do is elect their captains because the captains would either be owners, part owners, or trustees of the owner of the ship (ships were massive investments).
Pirates seldom owned their ships. Typically these ships would be either built or stolen. With very few having bought them since Pirates actually were very poor, also, Pirates did technically elect their captains. Methods varied and there was no set method, but essentially it boils down to if the captain is respected or not, because if the captain is not respected then they are overthrown, thus a democracy is better at determining the captain. Also see the source posted in the note for more information
@@JonasGutenwald-yj8th You have no idea what you are talking about. You shouldn't argue in this context.
@@jimmydesouza4375 Okay, prove it
@@jimmydesouza4375 prove it, then. Prove I have no idea what I’m talking about
@@JonasGutenwald-yj8th Prove it? You don't even know what you are referring to when you use the word. Let's just assume you mean "the golden age of piracy", which is what most people mean. The piracy in the carribean.
Pirate is the colloquial term for "privateers". Privateers were gentlemen explorers with things called "letters of marque" (that is the term in the UK, though each nation had an equivalent) which gave them the authority to take vessels operated under the flag of specific nations (normally those in an active or cold war with the issuing nation) as "prizes", meaning they could then operate the ships themselves or sell them to the issuing nation. They took these vessels by buying their own armed vessels and hiring crew. Which they did with their wealth. They were not elected. They were the rich.
Additionally pirates were not poor. They were incredibly wealthy, which was the primary draw for joining or staying on a privateer ship. For every prize the ship took, each crew member would get at least 1 "share" (more senior crewmates got more of course). Because of how valuable ships were, even a thousandth share in a minor prize vessel would be the equivalent of multiple years worth of salary for a normal labourer.
That tweeter who turned out to be a murderer caught me a bit offguard.
Happened more than once; definitely the most shocking kinds of Community Notes
Thank god for community notes
It's surprising how people are siding with the community notes tbh.
Because they usually hate the "um actually" stuff and call it "nerdy"
Being proudly obnoxious beats "ackshually" on the annoying scale, and it just so happens that a fair amount of people on Twitter either lie compulsively or are simply unbearable
Considering how much stupid arrogance circulates Twitter, seems likely that people would rather side with the "um actuallys".
yeah some of the notes are really asinine. like the "wah they said mother instead of birthing person" it's the same thing bro
@@LilacMonarch Well, I'm just guessing here, but I think that note came about because
the initial post went out of its way to use some weird term like "birthing parent"
instead of just saying "women" or "mothers", like you'd expect.
Which doesn't even have the excuse of being something used in the study that was being referenced.
@@LilacMonarchNot everyone who can give birth is a woman.
0:22 theoretically, if 2 women could have a child, it actually always would be a girl. If 2 men could have a child it could be a girl or a boy. The More You Know
If they could. But they can't. Which is the entire point.
And if 2 men could have a child, it would not be either a girl or a boy. It could also be a third gender that doesn't currently exist with two Y chromosomes.
@giantWario if I remember right, babies with two Y chromosomes don't exist because they aren't viable and always need an X. Considering all the other chromosome combos out there have X chromosomes (a single x, xxy, xxxy). All those combinations are likely going to be sterile or at least infertile.
@@akl2k7 No they don't exist because you need an egg to make a baby and a woman's eggs only have X chromosomes. It's not the chromosome that's necessary, it's the egg. There's no way to tell if a YY baby would be viable or not because there is absolutely no way to *make* a YY baby in the first place. Which is why I said it doesn't currently exist.
@@giantWario Tangentially Related: A YY chromosome baby sounds like some fake science concotion from unironic sigma male content.
@@giantWario Maybe it's both. Looking it up, the X chromosome has essential genes so someone without one wouldn't be able to exist.
I think every platform should implement community notes. Its hilarious, and usually more correct
I like how community notes don’t have any targets, they don’t dunk on one type of person they just correct people’s mistakes
Just because a belief is spread far and wide, it doesn't mean it's automatically correct.
Not only Alexander the Great was not gay/bisexual, the Spartans weren't either. All of the evidence suggest completely the opposite - they detested homosexuality. The greatest insult in the ancient Greek lands was to call someone gay and, would you know it, all the accusations come from Greeks who hated the Spartans and the Macedonians.
True, but gay sex was absolutely a thing back then, it was just not seen the same way. It was more of a power thing than actual homosexuality
@@olivercharles2930 Well, at some times it was tolerated, at others they would stone, hang or drown gays to death. There were also people who performed sexual acts with boys via pederasty system and many of them were put to death. On the other hand, you do have the Sacred Band of Thebes who were, in fact, mostly gay dudes. But they were the exception. Greeks and Romans were never supportive or understanding towards gays, unlike what we were taught in schools. That was my point.
"Cats must have meat"
Good to know... very good to know...
The problem with twitter is that you don’t get all or even much of the context, so while these are funny, they are mostly useless
I'll never get tired of watching Community Notes violating people.
The tearing down of $550 stairs to be replaced by $10,000 stairs was still really stupid
Real ballsy of the cops to say the suspect shot and killed their dog, instead of their own fuckup.
The Police Department shot a K9 from the Sheriff's Department.
Also, the tweet never directly states the suspect shot the K9; however, it indeed was ambiguous enough to mislead from the fact local PD shot the SD K9.
Many such cases. There's also been a ton of cases where innocents were shot- only for cops to plant some evidence, or back each other up to claim the victim was actually a threat. Not saying all cops are bad, but worldwide, there are a lot of seeds of corruption within police corpses and it spoils the entire batch fast.
16:00 Any well designed bridge over busy shipping channels WILL have been designed with the possibility of collisions in mind. For example by surrounding the key piers with concrete barrier pilings known as Dolphins.
The need for such protective structures for bridge piers over shipping lanes has been well known to US engineering for over 40 years. Ever since the 1980 Sunshine Skyway bridge collapse.
Boo boo is now my favourite thing ever. Thank you for blessing us with its presence.
HAHAHA he is actually insane do not be fooled, 6 month Pomeranian
@@VaazkLShorts OH MY GOD BRO YOU READ MY COMMENT?! BRO IM 13 YEARS OLD IVE BEEN WATCHING YOUR VIDEOS FOR SO LONG HOLY SHIT
MAN IM SO HAPPY FOR YOU, YOU GOT A DOG!!!!! I hope boo boo grows up to be just as cool as his owner 😎
Community Notes are literally whats keeping X from falling 😭
3:11 assault rifles have no clear definition so they don't exist as an actual type of gun, so by default canons have killed more.
I love community notes they are amazing !!.
The K9 one, THE COMMUNITY NOTES MADE IT EVEN MORE SAD😢
Reality is quite sad sometimes. Lies can only hide that, not change it.
i like watching this as a podcast when im doing something
I love all of the "no" results.