I always thought the overland passage was rubbish. Thank you for your work in Baja. Obviously earlier establishments are undersea now, but people would have explored and lived inland aswell following paths of least resistance and reliable water and food.
i would also like to add that the denisovan peoples wore tailored clothes over 200 thousand years ago. mankind has been producing things like this for eons, fine detail as our wonder brains would allow.
@Train 2noplace a fine 1mm thick bone needle was found during the time they inhabited the cave. as well, precision drilled beads for necklace, very fine hole in delicate material.
By the way, as for the First Americans, Ainu aren't indigenous or aborigine at all. They came in 12th century and no relation with First Americans theme completely. They are quite different from Australian Aborigine and American native Indians' situation. Related people for the First Americans are Proto-Japanese Hokkaido（PJH, Hokkaido Sojin）had lived there, northern part of Japanese archipelago, since 35-30,000 years ago though their bones haven' t been found yet. Similar peoples' bones were found in Okinawa, as samples of 36,000~27,000 years ago. On the other hand, their ancestors are famous for crossing sea more than 20km to collect obsidians at Onbase island in Tokyo islands since 38,000 years ago. Any way, it's not Ainu, but Proto-Japanese Hokkaido（PJH）or Hokkaido Sojin as the ancestral candidate people of the First Americans. These're well known matter about Ainu and ancestors, but really very strange of no mentioning from university scholars' side.
Ainu possibly have ancient connections from greater mainland China and Asia. Anyway a closer starting point even from northern Japan would have navigated north along string of islands to Kamchatsky Krai thus making a much shorter route in total to the American continent than the late 'ice corridor' of 13,000 ago (an absurd notion).
a well preserved body of a man was found with an arrow lodged in his hip, the area where he died was along a river near the banks or on the banks of the columbia, studies on the bones and skull indicate he was not related to the modern native aboriginal inhabitants but perhaps the anu of japan. down further southern continent, stone heads of the olmec resemble negroid skulls. a city was discovered 30 years ago under 900 meters of seawater off the coast of cuba, an area that has not been above sea level for 100K plus years as geologists measure time barring some unfathomable cataclysm that drew the city down to these depths. anomolies are discarded in favor of the existing paradigm of human history.
The evidence has taken hypothesis to theory that 12,800 yrs BP a multiple comet impact, similar perhaps to the one witnessed impacting Jupiter some yrs ago, more or less vaporized the surface of the northern hemisphere. this is the reason the pre-Clovis evidence is so rare. Oldest evidence of human presence in North America is 50000 yrs from offshore drill core South Carolina.
A simple question: Why use BP, BCE when you have to reference the dates of Christ to get the date to adjust BP. In a thousand years they will still use that time point. so for the love of all things sane just leave it alone. As of the date of this study, 14,000 years prior to that man was there. So use BC. The entire world agrees to this time measurement. Until the next MAJOR world altering event happens, it will be the birth of Christ that sets the year.
They use BP for 2 reasons, because the standard AD/BC system doesn't have a 0 date. For very long ago dates around where that 2000 years stars not to matter in dates (like 50,000 years ago) It is more convinient to just use BP.
@@ikengaspirit3063 the zero date is fluid to about 50 years. 50 is nothing in the time scale. 50,000 BP will not be BP 50000 years from now without referencing AD to get the BP of the past studies the ENTIRE world recognizes AD, just look what date it is... hehehe
![ตีสิบเดย์ [FULL] | ตัวตึง! ปากกล้า! ท้ารบ! "ทนายไพศาล เรืองฤทธิ์"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/pU3dXTsaBVc/mqdefault.jpg)
![🎤 ไปกันต่อออ! จับฉลากร้องเพลง x P’ #XXSIVK [EP.2] (1/2) เพลงของใครจึ้งสุดน้าา 💓🎤 #MXFRUIT](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/mLI_K0sAS4o/mqdefault.jpg)
![[UNCUT] "เสรีพิศุทธ์" แฉยับ! งัดหลักฐานใหม่ชั้น 14 ได้นอนคุกสมใจแน่!! I คนดังนั่งเคลียร์ I 2 ก.ย.67](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/O1SSg4p9Izs/mqdefault.jpg)
I always thought the overland passage was rubbish. Thank you for your work in Baja. Obviously earlier establishments are undersea now, but people would have explored and lived inland aswell following paths of least resistance and reliable water and food.
Great work. Thanks for sharing.
i would also like to add that the denisovan peoples wore tailored clothes over 200 thousand years ago. mankind has been producing things like this for eons, fine detail as our wonder brains would allow.
@Train 2noplace a fine 1mm thick bone needle was found during the time they inhabited the cave. as well, precision drilled beads for necklace, very fine hole in delicate material.
I have some artifacts I found 23 inc bia face slate Clovis tip. Things I collected and managed to save over the years
Gostei muito 👍👏
By the way, as for the First Americans, Ainu aren't indigenous or aborigine at all. They came in 12th century and no relation with First Americans theme completely. They are quite different from Australian Aborigine and American native Indians' situation. Related people for the First Americans are Proto-Japanese Hokkaido（PJH, Hokkaido Sojin）had lived there, northern part of Japanese archipelago, since 35-30,000 years ago though their bones haven' t been found yet. Similar peoples' bones were found in Okinawa, as samples of 36,000~27,000 years ago. On the other hand, their ancestors are famous for crossing sea more than 20km to collect obsidians at Onbase island in Tokyo islands since 38,000 years ago. Any way, it's not Ainu, but Proto-Japanese Hokkaido（PJH）or Hokkaido Sojin as the ancestral candidate people of the First Americans. These're well known matter about Ainu and ancestors, but really very strange of no mentioning from university scholars' side.
Ainu possibly have ancient connections from greater mainland China and Asia. Anyway a closer starting point even from northern Japan would have navigated north along string of islands to Kamchatsky Krai thus making a much shorter route in total to the American continent than the late 'ice corridor' of 13,000 ago (an absurd notion).
As far as I know I have no alien, demon in me.
a well preserved body of a man was found with an arrow lodged in his hip, the area where he died was along a river near the banks or on the banks of the columbia, studies on the bones and skull indicate he was not related to the modern native aboriginal inhabitants but perhaps the anu of japan. down further southern continent, stone heads of the olmec resemble negroid skulls.
a city was discovered 30 years ago under 900 meters of seawater off the coast of cuba, an area that has not been above sea level for 100K plus years as geologists measure time barring some unfathomable cataclysm that drew the city down to these depths.
anomolies are discarded in favor of the existing paradigm of human history.
The evidence has taken hypothesis to theory that 12,800 yrs BP a multiple comet impact, similar perhaps to the one witnessed impacting Jupiter some yrs ago, more or less vaporized the surface of the northern hemisphere. this is the reason the pre-Clovis evidence is so rare. Oldest evidence of human presence in North America is 50000 yrs from offshore drill core South Carolina.
A simple question: Why use BP, BCE when you have to reference the dates of Christ to get the date to adjust BP. In a thousand years they will still use that time point. so for the love of all things sane just leave it alone. As of the date of this study, 14,000 years prior to that man was there. So use BC. The entire world agrees to this time measurement. Until the next MAJOR world altering event happens, it will be the birth of Christ that sets the year.
They use BP for 2 reasons, because the standard AD/BC system doesn't have a 0 date.
For very long ago dates around where that 2000 years stars not to matter in dates (like 50,000 years ago) It is more convinient to just use BP.
@@ikengaspirit3063 the zero date is fluid to about 50 years. 50 is nothing in the time scale. 50,000 BP will not be BP 50000 years from now without referencing AD to get the BP of the past studies the ENTIRE world recognizes AD, just look what date it is... hehehe
De Doo do Doo de da da da !
Corrected date Before Present. P is 1950
Am I actually wasting my time responding to this. (Hypothetical question, no response required.)