We should have never have sold him in the first place. Was clear he would be top prem centre back in a few years, we sold him for pure profit so we could buy an inflated Wesley fofana (who is talented but lasts all but 3 games a season). Same situation with Chalobah, he was ostracised from the team and replaced by disasi (who is worse) and now we are considering bringing him back as well. The lesson to be learnt here, is when you have elite academy stars who have proven top level experience, you should trust them rather than splashing on risky players from other teams 🤔
Why is that Sky Sports reporter saying that Chelsea’s 20% Guehi sell on clause irrelevant if we buy him? Mate, it just means that the club would only have to pay 80% of whatever transfer fee that they would pay if they buy him
I don't know whether it's true that the sell-on clause would be invalid. If not, the 20% sell-on fee would probably be recorded as immediate income while the whole fee would be amortized over the length of the contract. If the contract were 5 years, the current year cost could be zero.
The most sickly player, weak, often injured, bought for a high price, only played 32 matches, Fofana2, if he is not sold, he will definitely be injured forever
How much money for Guéhi-£70 mil vs on loan Chalobah? What other wirld class, youngish CB's available at that price? Or are CFC looking for a rotating, muli-talented, versatile role-playing figure (RCB, LCB, RB, HM)?
Can you guys stop racing topic of Fofana every time Chelsea mentioned looking for a Centre back. Fofana is a defender signed at very high cost 72 million since five years or more ego but has been unable to play up to 20 matches in Chelsea shirt due to injuries. It often sound like an obstacle on the Clubs way not to go for another replacement all the time. Guehi could make a better option if they could succeed resigning him back to Chelsea.
🤣🤣 please tell me this ain’t a wind up….Micky Van der ven? He isn’t no where near good enough, Guehi is much better. I’ll tell you a good defender…..the Newcastle centre back Botman.
If we plan on selling Disasi even in the summer, I would take Guehi but only for 50 million. He can cover Levi and Fofana and is Englands first choice CB beside Stones. Would prefer to sign Araujo or Silva from Benfica.
It never works mate. Unless it’s a ex great who going back to help out for a season or two. Letting a player go because you don’t think he good enough, bringing them back never works.
@@BSMAG87 to be fair , I said never works, means hardly ever. I’m sure you can pick the odd one or two. But was MATIC let go or did he choose to leave ?
@@Skunkman-w5x He left for the same reason guys like Guehi and Livramento left... for playing time. None of these guys really forced a move and would have preferred to stay, but ultimately, made the right decisions for their respective careers
@@BSMAG87 let’s see then. Personally I think he should go newcastle if they still interested in him. But if he wants to leave palace he will probably choose to stay in London
🤣🤣🤣🤦we're not selling him unless they 'swap' us Chalobah and give us £40M odd given we value Trev at £20M. We told Toon to bugger off in the summer. We'll sell him in the summer as has been obvious for a while unless Chelsea hugely sweeten the pot. They'd be better offf recalling Chalobah...except they are highly likely to need to sell him for FFP reasons🤷.
Rudiger was levels off what Guehi is now when he was his age though. And Guehi still fits the Chelsea U25 model so it makes sense. And who knows how far off world class he is while he’s playing for Crystal Palace
Guehi Oky and bring home Andry Santos calobah Kepa is back in top form ... to replace players is useless fofana calobah is stronger Kepa is good again Andry Santos is the same
We should have never have sold him in the first place. Was clear he would be top prem centre back in a few years, we sold him for pure profit so we could buy an inflated Wesley fofana (who is talented but lasts all but 3 games a season). Same situation with Chalobah, he was ostracised from the team and replaced by disasi (who is worse) and now we are considering bringing him back as well. The lesson to be learnt here, is when you have elite academy stars who have proven top level experience, you should trust them rather than splashing on risky players from other teams 🤔
Why is that Sky Sports reporter saying that Chelsea’s 20% Guehi sell on clause irrelevant if we buy him? Mate, it just means that the club would only have to pay 80% of whatever transfer fee that they would pay if they buy him
I don't know whether it's true that the sell-on clause would be invalid. If not, the 20% sell-on fee would probably be recorded as immediate income while the whole fee would be amortized over the length of the contract. If the contract were 5 years, the current year cost could be zero.
We want Trevor 💙
Guehi and chabloh are decent defenders, disasi and badioshile are average defenders !!!
The most sickly player, weak, often injured, bought for a high price, only played 32 matches, Fofana2, if he is not sold, he will definitely be injured forever
Nemanja Matic was a success on His coming back to Chelsea
David Luiz too
Rather take Chalobah, but we'll see what happens
Alex Disasi? these guys are clueless, read some BBC reports before this
How much money for Guéhi-£70 mil vs on loan Chalobah? What other wirld class, youngish CB's available at that price? Or are CFC looking for a rotating, muli-talented, versatile role-playing figure (RCB, LCB, RB, HM)?
They need something. There last couple of results are showing a weakness somewhere in the side.
Who is Alex Disasi?
Its embarrassing constantly buying back players we sold
Lol might aswell loan ffs
Can you guys stop racing topic of Fofana every time Chelsea mentioned looking for a Centre back. Fofana is a defender signed at very high cost 72 million since five years or more ego but has been unable to play up to 20 matches in Chelsea shirt due to injuries. It often sound like an obstacle on the Clubs way not to go for another replacement all the time. Guehi could make a better option if they could succeed resigning him back to Chelsea.
guehi is exactly the same as what we have, he might be a bit better we need someone like a van der ven
🤣🤣 please tell me this ain’t a wind up….Micky Van der ven? He isn’t no where near good enough, Guehi is much better. I’ll tell you a good defender…..the Newcastle centre back Botman.
Not sure about Van der Ven, but agreed that Guehi really isn't it either. We need to stop buy a bunch of potential and never something proven.
He's better than most of our cbs but he really isn't that great either. No.
This is the problem of poor and bad decision made by Chelsea
If we plan on selling Disasi even in the summer, I would take Guehi but only for 50 million. He can cover Levi and Fofana and is Englands first choice CB beside Stones. Would prefer to sign Araujo or Silva from Benfica.
For England cb partnership pairing guehi/levi.
For cfc club - bastoni
Recall Trevor and save the money for a top class striker. Sell Disasi this window or in the summer. Need that dude gone.
Well he deserves a second chance at least he has proven himself over and over again and resigning him won't be bad idea
It never works mate. Unless it’s a ex great who going back to help out for a season or two. Letting a player go because you don’t think he good enough, bringing them back never works.
@@Skunkman-w5x Nemanja Matic would like to have a word
@@BSMAG87 to be fair , I said never works, means hardly ever. I’m sure you can pick the odd one or two. But was MATIC let go or did he choose to leave ?
@@Skunkman-w5x He left for the same reason guys like Guehi and Livramento left... for playing time. None of these guys really forced a move and would have preferred to stay, but ultimately, made the right decisions for their respective careers
@@BSMAG87 let’s see then. Personally I think he should go newcastle if they still interested in him. But if he wants to leave palace he will probably choose to stay in London
I think we have enough Marc in our team
Let us know on sky has a better ring.
I knew this transfer would be possible, its No 1 on yt short lol🤣
🤣🤣🤣🤦we're not selling him unless they 'swap' us Chalobah and give us £40M odd given we value Trev at £20M. We told Toon to bugger off in the summer. We'll sell him in the summer as has been obvious for a while unless Chelsea hugely sweeten the pot. They'd be better offf recalling Chalobah...except they are highly likely to need to sell him for FFP reasons🤷.
get me a striker
Guehi. Is far from being world class .infact he is not levels above Chalobah. Chelsea need a CB of the caliber of prime T.Silva, Rudiger etc
Rudiger was levels off what Guehi is now when he was his age though. And Guehi still fits the Chelsea U25 model so it makes sense. And who knows how far off world class he is while he’s playing for Crystal Palace
Agreed. Guehi is good but adds to another long list of players with potential but not proven to the highest.
Starting to get fed up with these nobodies reporting on football, no disrespect but please get ex players or managers onboard again
No. I don't want him back at my club.
What's your reason ?
Yes. He us in and out Chelsea centre back with 100% blue blood
Matic
Nemanja Matic
No.
Trev.
Guehi Oky and bring home Andry Santos calobah Kepa is back in top form ... to replace players is useless fofana calobah is stronger Kepa is good again Andry Santos is the same
Short and simple answer . yes
Yes Chelsea will Resigning Marc Guéhi
Hell no
No!
NO NO WE SHOULD GO FOR BEST DEFENSE AND WE DON'T NEED HIM
NO
No we have enough players as it is sell disasi and maybe badsheil bring back chalobah
I could go to maidstone utd and pick up better defence than weve got
We are not buying Guehi, we have enough defenders already, Colwell, Renato Veiga and Bedaishle left footed