Simply the best t2v right now. Spatial consistency is superior to all the other models, but not surprising given the amount of data and years they've spent on mapping the world.
Thank you for the overview. Question: do you know if these fantastic videos are generated by “only” one “prompt” shown in the caption? Or there are other prompts earlier to prepare the scenes!
My understanding is you can choose both paths: 1- Text to Image to Video (2 steps approach = first generate the scene and then set up the motion. 2- Text to Video (direct approach where you generate the whole video with a single prompt)
Let's hope that it keep as good as we hope it´s, and it's not pure HYPE like it was with Sora, I trust in Google Deep Mind a lot more than Open AI anyways..
@@armondtanz true. I never use text to video for my things - I always generate an image first so it cuts down, as you say, on randomness. But the comments on this new offering from Google include image to video doing exceptionally well. We will have to wait and see, but third party testers giving this kind of feedback is very encouraging. I believe that the testers are also required to give regular feedback to Google on the quality of the results they are getting. I get the feeling Google is going all out on this to make sure it is miles ahead of any other generator. Probably because they've been so far behind until now.
_Sora_ is being surpassed by everyone.
I hope _Kling_ releases their _2.0_ version soon.
Kling 1.6 is coming this week 👍🏼 Stay tuned for full review (2.0 needs more time I guess)
@@cyberjungle A "1.6" version?
Now, that is very interesting.
These AI models usually jump from 1.5 to 2.0.
I wonder what the 1.6 version will have...
Waiting on Kling
They took too many time
That octopus vs knight was an epic example!
This is a way better thumbnail best one so far
That low angle POV shot of the beast in the water was amazing.
oh my, this is insane. This is what sora was supposed to be.
maybe it's because google has access to the youtube library?
That is the best looking video model that I still can't use...
I know the feeling. Google is teasing hard
Simply the best t2v right now. Spatial consistency is superior to all the other models, but not surprising given the amount of data and years they've spent on mapping the world.
This looks great. Any insight into whether it can maintain character consistency?
2:24 Guy in the street walking through invisible water.😂
Very impressive, thank you for updating us
💚
Mazing.
0:29
Love your content. The correct word is "surpassed" not "supressed". 👍
Thank you for the overview.
Question: do you know if these fantastic videos are generated by “only” one “prompt” shown in the caption? Or there are other prompts earlier to prepare the scenes!
My understanding is you can choose both paths: 1- Text to Image to Video (2 steps approach = first generate the scene and then set up the motion. 2- Text to Video (direct approach where you generate the whole video with a single prompt)
Sora competing with Pika
I always join waitlists of google, but they never give access
Same here :(
Let's hope that it keep as good as we hope it´s, and it's not pure HYPE like it was with Sora, I trust in Google Deep Mind a lot more than Open AI anyways..
"Google Just Changed AI Video Forever"... but you cant use it -lol-
:)
This is a game changer, can't wait for its release. Thank you for sharing this piece of info!
💚
the image generator is so censored, i couldn't do the 1st 2 prompts, one was an action scene????? lol, not a great start
Yeah ok very good
forever isn't as long as it used to be.
When google veo 2, adobe, sora, nvidia has launched, goodbye China AI. China just shows off but doesn't care about quality
Don't bet against Google 😂
Lol. Translation to "one of the best ive seen".
Heavily cherry picked, the best of best videos generated.
Apparently not so. Some testers have said that it really is this good on even the first attempt with a prompt.
@cbnewham5633 the big one is image to vid. All the leading AI movie makers use that format.
Using words is just too random.
@@armondtanz true. I never use text to video for my things - I always generate an image first so it cuts down, as you say, on randomness. But the comments on this new offering from Google include image to video doing exceptionally well. We will have to wait and see, but third party testers giving this kind of feedback is very encouraging. I believe that the testers are also required to give regular feedback to Google on the quality of the results they are getting. I get the feeling Google is going all out on this to make sure it is miles ahead of any other generator. Probably because they've been so far behind until now.
The tennis motion is pretty awful. Running is decent.
pretty awful in comparison to real life? :)
@@cyberjungle Yeah. What they were doing bears no resemblance to how (even a below average) casual player swings at the ball.
First