Why I believe the Shroud of Turin is a piece of art

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 6

  • @GeoSam
    @GeoSam 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I'm with you on this hypothesis. 👍

  • @jimbertrand8587
    @jimbertrand8587 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

    A rubbing technique would penetrate through most if not all of the threads - about 0.34mm in diameter. The superficiality of the image on the fibers only penetrates 0.2 microns / a fraction of just one of the fibrils making up the thread.

    • @perkgrok822
      @perkgrok822  12 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      My position do not hinge on it being a rubbing, though I think that is the most likely method.
      Rubbings can be done in different ways. I don't think it has been excluded that some method of rubbing over a bas-relief could have been how it was done. I'm not aware of any large testing of different methods and chemicals aimed at seeing if a discoloring of a very thin part of each fiber can be done. At most you can say that it has not been reproduced yet.
      I can see two other ways is could have been done and there might be other ways that I don't realize.
      The fact that it looks like the artifact is done by an artist that thought that showing the genitalia would be in bad taste, supports that it was made by a human, one way or another. That's convincing to me. If that is not convincing to you, that is fine.

  • @TommysBliss
    @TommysBliss 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

    th-cam.com/video/UP6KzzAwgnk/w-d-xo.htmlsi=DlIuqhYyNUumDefL

    • @perkgrok822
      @perkgrok822  2 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Nothing new there.
      Still looks like a work of art.