Ultimate Large Numbers List 2024 - The Biggest Numbers Ever!!!

[@Mrmasterbr]

All Eras:
Knuth Period:
0:00 Counting Era
3:54 Exponential Era
12:55 Tretational Era
31:09 Knuth Era
Array Period:
1:06:10 Chained Era
1:31:02 Linear Array Era
2:07:01 Dimensional Era
2:55:07 Nested Era
3:25:27 Elipson lvl Era
Phi level Period:
3:43:29 Binary phi Era
4:01:44 Veblen phi Era
Colapsing Period:
4:41:55 Bachman era
5:04:14 Bucholz era
Post-Colapsing Period:
5:32:03 Uncontable Era
5:41:29 Inacessível Era
5:56:14 Mahlo Era
Dopping Period:
6:16:12 Primary Dopping Era
6:36:22 Multiple Dopping Era
Ultimate Period(The Last Eras):
7:07:57 Higher TSS Era
8:02:06 Higher BMS Era
8:43:47 Y-Sequence Era
9:32:11 Pre-Infinity Era(The Last Era!!!)
Finally Was Ended Thank You Guys From 304 Likes😢
Note:Elipson Lvl Period Is Undetermined you can Call This A Transition between Array Era And Phi level Era
Note 2:I am A Brazilian 🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷

[@Kuino]

ah yes

[@Firewallboy77]

Poir soul i will like your comment

[@bloxninjagaming6577]

Ok

[@Abbiizzy1]

ē😊rRØR

[@gavinlorenzof.javellana4030]

Respect for this person watching everything on this videeo

[@WhoStoleMyHappiness]

Fun fact: no matter what number you think of, you will always be closer to 0 than to infinity.
Edit: people, infinity is not a number. I mean real numbers that you can imagine like 10 million, 5.6 quadrillion and so on

[@nzqarc]

Fun fact: transfinite and surreal numbers disprove that

[@bryantofsomething5964]

No shit

[@nn-taleb]

Fun fact: no matter what number you think of, you will always be closer to 69 than to infinity.

[@timetraveller2818]

Fun fact:For any real number,say X, you think of, the distance between any real number k and the number,X, you thought of, the distance i.e |k-X| will be strictly less than the distance between X and infinity.
To write in proper mathematical notation,
|k-X| < |X-infinity|
Note: see "infinity" as the symbol representing infinity

[@nn-taleb]

@@timetraveller2818 can't do operations with infinity

[@davidbakke9293]

10 hours of numbers that get exponentially and sequentially bigger every single time just shows how immeasurable infinity really is!

[@Omninfinity]

i am immeasurable

[@davidbakke9293]

@@Omninfinity woah, speak of the devil

[@gpt-jcommentbot4759]

Fun Fact: For those wondering about a comparison/number of atoms in the universe to Graham's Number: Every single finite value in the physical world is dwarved by every single number starting at about ~ 24:30. Graham's Number sits at 1:09:29. And for those wondering about TREE(3), it sits at 4:43:37, which is less than 50% of the total video length.

[@bebesquare]

speaking of immeasurability
just consider that you could theoretically have fit another ten hours before you said infinity
and another ten hours as well
and another 10
another 10
if you took the lifespan of the universe from the big bang to its future heat death for this video there would still be an infinite gap between infinity and the previous finite number

[@rolandroland4366]

Incredible is how small our observable universe are!!! 😮

[@Bud16]

2:55:13
THE LEGENDARY EXPLOSIVE EDAMAME TACO

[@MatteoFuenzalida-v1n]

Eat it, and you will be (1337,1337(1337)1337) kg

[@TheRealHammyShark]

Why it's called that is probably because Legendary Explosive Edamame Taco's initals are LEET. That's why there's so many 1337's.

[@BAT4423HGB]

{1337,1337 (1337) 1337}

[@Kauan-Kaiser]

E concebeu outra vez e deu à luz um filho, dizendo: Esta vez louvarei ao Senhor.
Por isso chamou-o Judá; e cessou de dar à luz.
Gênesis 30
Vendo Raquel que não dava filhos a Jacó, teve inveja de sua irmã, e disse a Jacó:
Dá-me filhos, se não morro. Então se acendeu a ira de Jacó contra Raquel, e disse: Estou eu no lugar de Deus, que te impediu o fruto de teu ventre?
E ela disse: Eis aqui minha serva Bila; coabita com ela, para que dê à luz sobre
meus joelhos, e eu assim receba filhos por ela.
Assim lhe deu a Bila, sua serva, por mulher; e Jacó a possuiu.
E concebeu Bila, e deu a Jacó um filho.
Então disse Raquel: Julgou-me Deus, e também ouviu a minha voz, e me deu um

[@JesusPlsSaveMe]

​@@MatteoFuenzalida-v1n
*Revelation 3:20*
Behold, I stand at the door, and knock: if any man hear my voice, and open the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with me.
HEY THERE 🤗 JESUS IS CALLING YOU TODAY. Turn away from your sins, confess, forsake them and live the victorious life. God bless.
Revelation 22:12-14
And, behold, I come quickly; and my reward is with me, to give every man according as his work shall be.
I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, the first and the last.
Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city.

[@Ultimabuster92]

"This number cannot be written in full, because there aren't enough atoms IN THE UNIVERSE to hold all the digits"... roughly 16 minutes in....

[@mcgaming1172]

Now for the last few numbers u can't even think of the number of universes that would be required to write it all

[@kjakkakakka]

​@@mcgaming1172You don't need to go that far lol

[@biggusdickus1689]

​@@kjakkakakkaProbably true though

[@Fractaloffical]

Numbers are endless, they don't have a end
10^3=1,000
10^10^3=10^1,000
10^10^10^3=10^10^1,000 and so on...
10^^3=10^10^10
WIP

[@robinpinar9691]

​@@Fractalofficalthey have a end

[@anak_kucing101]

I remember when I was little, I was learning numbers. In school, I had been given a paper with numbers from 1 to 99, and I was reciting them to my mom. I recited "96, 97, 98, 99, and 1000," but my mom told me that after 99, it wasn't 1000, but 100. That's when I felt like my eyes opened a bit, and then I asked, "What is the last number?" and she told me, "Numbers are infinite; they don't have an end." I felt like my mind was opened to understand the cosmos.

[@HarshRaj-px9se]

You are not the only one alone my brother, there are many of us.

[@Adam_Lyskawa]

But it's not the end of the story. Because it seems like the cosmos is not infinite. It's finite, like time. Now let's think the other way around. Think of getting the closest to zero. What fraction can be considered zero for anything usable / imaginable? So, 2 to the power of 64 is not a big number compared with let's say Graham's number. It's tiny. That's a maximal precission of 64-bit numbers used in most computers. And it seems more than enough to express any distance in the universe up to its very resolution. So why all the larger numbers? To express numbers of possibilities. Of how things can connect or be related to each others. However, if there's a finite number of things, there's also a finite number of how they can relate to each other. So even the number of all possibilities is finite. So what the infinity is? That one is simple. Not a number. It's way easier to imagine than let's say Graham's number. Here: infinite time - time to get from point A to point B (assuming they are not the same point) without moving. The time to move with zero speed ;) If it takes infinite number of anything - it is simply impossible. Anything that takes infinite number of anything to exist - doesn't exist. So everything that exists takes a finite number of... anything ;)

[@demonreturns4336]

My guy told this story like it’s the first time he learned about his Jedi powers or something 😆

[@cytarea]

Good job, with that, you are definitely smarter than approximately 80% of population, because a lot of people do not focus on those topics.🎉

[@anak_kucing101]

@@cytarea I was just trying to be a little dramatic 😅, but the anecdote is real.

[@vincent1023]

0:00 One
8:21 Googol
15:49 Googolplex
21:38 Googolplexian
29:58 Giggol
35:29 Giggolplex
42:30 Gaggol
47:02 Gagggolplex
51:35 Geegol
54:46 Geegolplex
57:45 Gigol
1:00:22 Goggol
1:00:33 Higher ackerermaniaan range
1:02:03 Gagol
1:04:11 Tridecal
1:05:57 Boogol 10{100}10
1:09:37 Grahams jumber
1:18:26 Giggol 10{{100}}10
1:23:13 Baggol , Detonation range 10{{100}}}10
1:26:05 Beegol, Higher tetrentrical range 10{{{{100}}}}10
1:29:37 General {10,10,10,10}
1:30:52 Troogol {10,10,100,1,2}, Linear array era, Lower pentetrical range
1:45:21 Quadroogol {10,10,10,10,100}, Lower Hexetrical range
1:54:53 Quintogool {10,10,10,10,10,100} , Heptentrical range
2:00:08 Hexoogol {10,7[2]2} , Higher linear array ranfe
2:02:29 Septoogol
2:03:45 Octogol
2:04:23 Iteral {10,10(1)2}
Dimensional array era - Ultra linear array
2:06:41 Goobol {10,100[2]2}
2:15:24 Gootrol {10,100[2]3}
2:18:45 Gootetrol {10,100[2]4}
2:20:29 Gossol {10,100[2]1,2}
Dimension array era - Sillinear array range
2:24:38 Mossol {10,100[2]1,1,2}
2:26:36 Bossol {10,100[2]1,1,1,2}
2:29:10 Dubol {10,100[2]1[2]2}
Dimensional array era - Trillinear array range
2:36:11 Xappol {10,100(2)2}
Dimensional array era - Ultra planar array range
2:44:38 Collosol {10,100(3)2}
Dimensional array era - Biplanar array range
Dimensional array era -
Realmic array range
2:44:38 Tetrossol {10,100(5)2}
Dimensional array era - Flunar array range
2:50:04 Terosoll {10,100(6)2}
Dimensional array era - Higher dimensional array era
2:55:08 Gongulus - {10,100(1,2)2}
Nested array era - Ultra dimensional array range
3:01:21 Gingulus {10,100(1,3)2}
Nested array era - Plandimensional array range
3:05:44 Bongulus {10,100(1,1,2)2}
Nested array era - Realdimensional array range
3:10:36 Trongulus {10,100(1,1,1,2)2}
Nested array era - Super dimensional array range
3:13:10 Quadrongulus
{10,100(1,1,1,1,2)2}
3:15:00 Goplexus {10,100(1(1))2}
Nested array era - Tridimensional array range
3:21:05 Goduplexus {10,100[1[1[2]2]2]2}
Nested array era - Quadimensional array range
3:23:13 Gotriplexus {10,100(1(1(1)))2}
Nested array era - Higher tetrational array range
3:25:26 Goppatoth {10,100[1/2]2}
Epsilon-level era - Second level tetrational array range
Epsilon level era - Ultra-Tetrational array range
3:34:20 SCG(1) Lower bound - {10,{10,100[1/2]3}[1/4]2}
Epsilon level era - Bitetetrational array range {10,100[1/1,2]2} - {10,100[1/1[1/2]2]2}
Epsilon level era - Planotetrational array range
{10,100[1/1[1/2]2]2} - {10,100[1/1/2]2}
Binary phi level era - Realmotetetrational array range
{10,100[1/1/2]2} - {10,100[1/1/1/2]2}
Binary phi level era - Dimenotetetrational array range
{10,100[1/1/1/2]2} - {10,100[1[2-2]2]2}
Binary phi level era - Superdinenotetrational array range {10,100[1[2-2]2]2} - {10,100[1[1,2-2]2]2}
3:57:00 Triakulus 3&3&3
Binary phi level era - Supertetrational array range
{10,100[1[1,2-2]2]2} - {10,100[1[1[1/2]2-2]2]2}
Binary phi level era - Higher pentational array range
{10,100[1[1[1/2]2-2]2]2} - {10,100[1[1/2-2]2]2}
4:01:53 Kungulus {10,100[1[1/2-2]2]2]2}
Veblen phi level era - Ultra pentational array era
{10,100[1[1/2-2]2]2} - {10,100[1[1[1/2-2]1/2]2]2}
Velben phi level era - Dimensotepentational array range
{10,100[1[1[1/2-2]1/2]2]2} - {10,100[1[1[1/2-2]2[2-2]2]2}
Velben phi level era - Super pentational array range
{10,100[1[1/2-2]1[2-2]2]2} - {10,100[1[1/2-2]1[1[1/2-2]1]1]1/2-2]2]2-2]2]2-2]2]2}
Veblen phi level era - Hexational array era - {10,100[1[1/2-2]2[1/2-2]2]2}
4:14:47 Quadrunculus {10,100[1[1/2-2]1[1/2-2]2]2]2}
Heptational array range - {10,100[1[1/2-2]2[1/2-2]2]2} - {10,100[1[1/2-2]1[1/2-2]1[1/2-2]2]2}
Operational array era - {10,100[1[2/2-2]2]2}
4:20:01 Tridecatrix 3&10&10
4:20:18 Humongulus 10{100}10&10
Expandal array range - {10,100[1[1/3-2]2]2}
Multiexpandal array range - {10,100[1[1/3-2]1[1/3-2]2]2}
Tetrentational array range - {10,100[1[1/4-2]2]2}
Pententational array range {10,100[1[1/5-2]2]2}
Linearentational array range -{10,100[1[1/1,2-2]2]2}
Bachmann collapsing era
4:42:09 SCG(2) f_p(o^o^w)(SCG(1)))
Ultra lineartentational array range - {10,100[1[1/1/2-2]2]2}
4:34:43 TREE(3)
4:45:11 SSCG(3) f_p(o^o^w^2 2)(100)
Sillinational array range - {10,100[1[1/1/1,2-2]2]2}
Planational array range- {10,100[1[1/1/1,2-2]2]2}
Reamtational array range
-{10,100[1[1/1/1/2-2]2]2}
Dimenmotetational array range
-{10,100[1[1[2-2]2-2]2]2]2}
Superdinenotetrational array range - {10,100[1[1[1/2-2]2-2]2]2}
Higher tetrational array space era -{10,100[1[1-3]2]2}
Bucholz collapsing era
Pentational array space range -
{10,10[1[1[1-2/³2]2]2]2}
Operational array space range- {10,10[1[1[2-2/³2]2]2]2}
Linearational array space range - {10,100[1[1[1-1,2/³2]2]2]2}
Higher sublegion range - {L,1}10,10
Font change
Higher uncontable level era
Post sublegion range - {L,2}10,100
Multilegional array space
- {L,100}100,100
Tetrational-Lugattic arrap space -
Inaccessible level era
Mahlo level era - Pentational leggattic array space - {L,X,3}10,100
6:16:15 Primary dropping level era - Hexational leggatic array space - f_p(M(1,1)(100)
Operational leggatic array space p(M(w,0))
Expandal leggatic array space-{L,X,1,2}10,100
6:26:41 Linear leggatic array range - (L,X(1)2}
6:31:02 Dimensional leggatic array space - {L,X(1,2)2}
6:34:57 Tetrational leggatic array space - {L,X(1'2)2)
Multiple dropping level era
6:36:38 Higher leggatic array range - {10,100\2}
6:39:12 Lugion array range - {L,2,100}100,100
6:40:44 Tetrenttrational luggatic array range - {L2,X,2}10,100
6:42:11 Linear luggatic array range - {L2,X(1)2}10,10
6:45:57 Higher luggatic array range - {L3,X}10,100
6:48:48 Lagion array range - {L4,X}10,100
6:49:25 Ligion array range - {L5,X}10,100
6:50:57 Higher BEAF Range - LIMIT OF BEAF
6:55:29 Higher secondary dropping range
7:02:20 Territory Dropping range
7:06:17 Higher dropping range
Multiple dropping level era
Higher TSS Era
7:08:04 Nested dropping array range
7:15:01 Higher expanding array range
7:19:00 Higher Multiexpanding array range
7:37:16 Primary dropper dropping array range
7:46:25 Dropper-dropping array range
8:02:06 OSS
8:32:31 QISS
8:39:34 Linear bms range
8:43:46 Y sequence era, Transfinite bms range
8:51:22 Ultralinear Bms
9:12:21 Bilinear BMS
9:23:24 Trillinear BMS
9:30:20 Planar bms range
9:32:19 Ultraplanar BMS
9:41:20 Realmic BMS ()(1)(2,1,,1,,,1)(3,2,1,,2,1,,1,,,2,1)
9:44:38 Plunar BMS ()(1)(2,1,,1,,,1,,,,1)
9:49:02 Dimensional bms ()(1)(2,1,,1,,,1,,,,1,,,,,1)
9:51:13 Higher computable range

[@meredithgordon541]

One appears at 0:03

[@mustafa7408]

Did you really watch whole goddamn video

[@richardm654]

​@@mustafa7408😂

[@imishka]

TREE(3) 4:43:34

[@murray8378]

Where is Grahm’s number?

[@My_initials_are_O.G.cuz_I_am]

Some of these make GREAT D&D character names.
"The ork warchief Grangoldex's fight against the goblin archmage Great Tritri was legendary."

[@Shanethebane78]

Infinite name generator

[@demonreturns4336]

Not gonna lie…. When I saw treegol I thought for a second that could be Sméagol’s cousin or something

[@zakelwe]

I was thinking of races and people in the hitchhikers guide to the galaxy

[@gambacherkalbenstein]

😂😂😂

[@ratio9917]

Ogolding vs Faxul, the battle of history

[@nado-x3b]

The hospital bill when you take a drink of water:

[@InfinityITX]

???

[@osgubben]

In USA, yes! In Norway and civilised countries: 0.

[@AG_247]

I am too civilised to understand this joke

[@kitesurf4life]

I calculated 7128 numbers in this video!
Dude, that is a stunningly massive work you did!
Thanks!

[@nhbons783]

WOW! THATS MORE THAN EVERY NUMBER IN THE VIDEO COMBINED!!!!!?!?!!11!1!1!1!1!NN!N!

[@Blackfromstickworld]

I understand the joke 😂

[@nhbons783]

@@Blackfromstickworld joke?

[@aaajeear8654]

​@@nhbons783the joke is bro saying 7k numbers is a stunning massive work when we just saw how truly big they can get.

[@satyam-isical]

I hope Mr.Beast watches full video at 0.25x along with pronouncing the numbers.

[@Cezzer0]

Let's hit him up fr

[@theodriggers549]

Some of them don't have names

[@Randomizer.gaming]

@@theodriggers549then he becomes patient while waiting for more and has to read ALL THE DESCRIPTIONS for the numbers as well

[@BenMyFriendGaming]

he will have to pronounce numbers like Meameamealokkapoowa oompa loompa

[@OnyxIdol]

I like how the notations get ever more esoteric

[@Bill_W_Cipher]

You have to remember that each of these numbers is incredibly minuscule when compared to the next one in the list.

[@u26535]

yet unimaginably closer to zero than infinity

[@excaliburhead]

Infinity is forever underestimated but people talk about it like it’s well-contained

[@Scarred_Sapphire]

Cuz its boring bruh 😞it doesnt overstimulate my brain anymore

[@賽萊洛]

Infinity is underestimated because of anime/fiction

[@Kauan-Kaiser]

filho; por isso chamou-lhe Dã. E Bila, serva de Raquel, concebeu outra vez, e deu a Jacó o segundo filho. Então disse Raquel: Com grandes lutas tenho lutado com minha irmã; também venci; e chamou-lhe Naftali.
Vendo, pois, Lia que cessava de ter filhos, tomou também a Zilpa, sua serva, e deua a Jacó por mulher. E deu Zilpa, serva de Lia, um filho a Jacó.
Então disse Lia: Afortunada! e chamou-lhe Gade.
Depois deu Zilpa, serva de Lia, um segundo filho a Jacó.
Então disse Lia: Para minha ventura; porque as filhas me terão por bemaventurada; e chamou-lhe Aser. E foi Rúben nos dias da ceifa do trigo, e achou mandrágoras no campo. E trouxeas
a Lia sua mãe. Então disse Raquel a Lia: Ora dá-me das mandrágoras de teu filho. E ela lhe disse: É já pouco que hajas tomado o meu marido, tomarás também as

[@Idk_idk22268]

Infinity is not a number + finite big numbers like Graham’s Number, Busy Beaver, TREE and SSCG are cooler.

[@michelemehelean17]

I think we underestimate it because we can't even imagine what it is like...

[@vigothecatplay4234]

"skipping 1 math class"
what they learned on it:

[@SyedShah-os7ck]

A Journey through numbers can give us an appreciation for scaling, quantification and just how much numerical infinity can be - beyond the imaginative grasp !! It humbles you. Good Work!!

[@Preaplanes]

I don’t see it that way. When you have a number larger than that required to fill the entire observable universe with neutronium, and then count the quarks, you're not doing useful math anymore. You're now the kid on the playground yelling "my guy is eleventy bajillion times stronger", and I can't respect it.

[@SG2048-meta]

@@Preaplanesnumbers like graham number, TREE(3), and SCG(13) are useful, but most others aren’t.

[@kristinekondratjeva5541]

Gazillion has 28000 zeroes
You:But thats not a number!
Yeah thats not a frikin number

[@thlee4621]

Timeline with Era & Range:
1. Counting Era
0:00 Subitizing Range
0:27 Palpable Range
0:56 Tens Range
2:01 Hundreds Range
2:24 Thousands Range
3:18 Upper Counting Range
2. Exponential Era
4:00 Lower Astronomical Range
5:40 Higher Astronomical Range
8:14 Super-astronomical Range
10:07 Titanic Number Range
11:11 Gigantic Number Range
12:00 Megasized Number Range
3. Tetrational Era
13:13 Higher Writable Number Range
15:37 Unwritable Number Range
17:01 Hyperexponential Range
19:35 Super-hyperexponential Range
24:35 Lower Tetrational Range
28:09 Higher Tetrational Range
4. Knuth Arrow Era
31:03 Hyper-tetrational Range
36:00 Pentational Range
43:10 Hyper-pentational Range
47:19 Hexational Range
51:58 Heptational Range
58:05 Octational Range
1:00:31 Higher Ackermannian Range
5. Chained Arrow Era
1:06:20 Expansion Range
1:09:54 Multiexpansion Range
1:12:34 Powerexpansion Range
1:14:56 Higher Expansion Range
1:18:40 Explosion Range
1:23:08 Detonation Range
1:25:58 Higher Tetratrical Range
6. Linear Array Era
1:31:08 Lower Pententrical Range
1:38:38 Higher Pententrical Range
1:45:22 Hexentrical Range
1:54:52 Heptentrical Range
2:00:10 Higher Linear Array Range
7. Dimensional Array Era
2:07:09 Second-level Linear Array Range
2:15:24 Ultra-linear Array Range
2:20:42 Bilinear Array Range
2:29:12 Trilinear Array Range
2:33:41 Planar Array Range
2:36:45 Ultra-planar Array Range
2:39:05 Biplanar Array Range
2:41:36 Realmic Array Range (3-D)
2:44:51 Flunar Array Range (4-D)
2:50:16 Higher Dimensional Array Range
8. Nested Array Era
2:55:17 Ultra-dimensional Array Range
2:59:01 Bidimensional Array Range
3:01:27 Planensional Array Range
3:05:52 Realdimensional Array Range
3:10:37 Superdimensional Array Range
3:15:06 Trimensional Array Range
3:21:11 Quadramensional Array Range
3:23:16 Higher Tetrational Array Range
9. Epsilon-level Era
3:25:33 Second-level Tetrational Array Range
3:32:46 Ultra-tetrational Array Range
3:35:02 Bitetrational Array Range
3:40:10 Planotetrational Array Range
10. Binary Phi-level Era
3:43:29 Realmotetrational Array Range
3:48:32 Dimensotetrational Array Range
3:53:22 Superdimensotetrational Array Range
3:57:37 Super-tetrational Array Range
3:58:57 Higher Pentational Array Range
11. Veblen Phi-level Era
4:01:49 Ultra-pentational Array Range
4:07:26 Planopentational Array Range
4:09:02 Dimensopentational Array Range
4:11:21 Super-pentational Array Range
4:14:27 Hexational Array Range
4:14:54 Heptational Array Range
4:18:16 Operational Array Range
4:20:25 Expandal Array Range
4:25:30 Multiexpandal Array Range
4:29:42 Hyperexpandal Array Range
4:31:08 Explodal Array Range
4:32:23 Tetrentational Array Range
4:36:21 Pententational Array Range
4:39:36 Lineational Array Range
12. Bachmann's Collapsing Era
4:42:01 Ultra-lineational Array Range
4:46:40 Bilineational Array Range
4:51:53 Planeational Array Range
4:54:01 Realmational Array Range
4:56:42 Dimensational Array Range
4:58:21 Superdimensational Array Range
5:02:28 Higher Tetrational-array Space Range
13. Buchholz Collapsing Era
5:04:21 Pentational-array Spaces Range
5:14:32 Operational-array Spaces Range
5:18:07 Lineational-array Spaces Range
5:20:43 Higher Sublegion Range
14. Higher Uncountable-level Era
5:32:07 Post-legional Array Range
5:40:00 Multilegional Array Range
15. Inaccessible-level Era
5:41:33 Tetrational-legiattic Array Range
16. Mahlo-level Era
5:55:20 Pentational-legiattic Array Range
17. Primary Dropping-level Era
6:16:14 Hexational-legiattic Array Range
6:22:15 Operational-legiattic Array Range
6:24:06 Expandal-legiattic Array Range
6:26:38 Linear-legiattic Array Range
6:30:56 Dimensional-legiattic Array Range
6:34:54 Tetrational-legiattic Array Range
18. Multiple Dopping Era
6:36:23 Higher-legiattic Array Range
6:39:11 Lugion-array Range
6:40:44 Tetrational Lugiattic-array Range
6:42:11 Linear Lugiattic-array Range
6:45:56 Higher Lugiattic-array Range
6:48:16 Lagion-array Range
6:50:15 Ligion-array Range
6:50:55 Higher BEAF Range
6:55:19 Higher Secondary-dropping Range
7:02:10 Tertiary-dropping Range
7:06:10 Higher Dropping-array Range
19. Higher TSS Era
7:08:04 Nested Dropping-array Range
7:14:56 Dropper-expanding Array Range
7:19:00 Dropper-multiexpanding Array Range
7:37:05 Primary Dropper-dropping Array Range
7:46:15 Dropper-dropping Array Range
20. Higher BMS Era
8:02:12 QSS Range
8:32:31 QiSS Range
8:40:30 Linear BMS Range
21. The Y-sequence Era
8:43:46 Transfinite BMS Range
8:51:22 Ultralinear BMS Range
9:12:20 Bilinear BMS Range
9:23:19 Trilinear BMS Range
9:30:11 Planar BMS Range
22. Post Y-sequence Era
9:32:12 Ultraplanar BMS Range
9:41:11 Realmic BMS Range
9:44:36 Flunar BMS Range
9:49:00 Dimensional BMS Range
9:51:08 Higher Computable Range
23. UNCOMPUTABLE ERA - 9:52:53
INFINITY - 9:53:34

[@simmansu]

Это звучит как хронология в замудрённой фетези игре для задротов.

[@JamesHindy-Saturn]

9:53:50 Now there is stuff past infinity, but it’s basically a repeat of what we have already done (like the ordinals in the FGH). I am not a fictional googologist so I’ll stop here. THE END

[@stephenjones4397]

"Wow, this is already into numbers bigger than I can conceive of or mostly have even heard of."
Followed by,
"Oh, there's still over nine hours left..."

[@Xnoob545]

I'd recommend you to go searching for videos on really big numbers
Just stay away from the ones with a million views, almost all of them are bad
Small channels almost exclusively dominate here

[@one_logic]

“I am not a fictional googologist so I’ll stop here.”
Sir, thank you.

[@robinpinar9691]

fictional googology starts at Absolute Infinity

[@Kauan-Kaiser]

deu por mulher Raquel sua filha. E Labão deu sua serva Bila por serva a Raquel, sua filha.
E possuiu também a Raquel, e amou também a Raquel mais do que a Lia e serviu
com ele ainda outros sete anos.
Vendo, pois, o Senhor que Lia era desprezada, abriu a sua madre; porém Raquel
era estéril. E concebeu Lia, e deu à luz um filho, e chamou-o Rúben; pois disse: Porque o Senhor atendeu à minha aflição, por isso agora me amará o meu marido. E concebeu outra vez, e deu à luz um filho, dizendo: Porquanto o Senhor ouviu que eu era desprezada, e deu-me também este. E chamou-o Simeão.
E concebeu outra vez, e deu à luz um filho, dizendo: Agora esta vez se unirá meu
marido a mim, porque três filhos lhe tenho dado. Por isso chamou-o Levi.

[@one_logic]

@@robinpinar9691 no it starts at infinity. All of googology is finite

[@one_logic]

@@Kauan-Kaiser Isso é da Bíblia?

[@danilomerelli2031]

Graham's number g(64) appears at 1:09:35, while g(3), which is unimaginably smaller than g(64), is very close to g(64) in terms of video time, at 1:08:35. So, not only are the numbers written already enormous as the video progresses, but if it takes just one minute to go from g(3) to g(64), in the nearly 10 hours of the video, the numbers don't just grow-they grow at an unimaginably fast rate...

[@minnie-piano3969]

this video was so long, and 150 hours spent is pretty crazy. thanks for making this!

[@EnerJetix]

Welp, you’ve done it; you have made the single greatest number comparison video. My search is over. This chapter of my life is now complete.

[@saathvikbogam]

Dude you need more views. Pretty cool video man.

[@liamw6976]

Whats crazy is that not even 8 minutes in, and we're already bigger than the number of atoms in the universe

[@victorguilherme7955]

This was one of the most satisfying videos I've ever seen! And congratulations for the hard work put into it!

[@mynlm]

Wow, this video is a gem of googology, this is the first time I see such detailed explanation of Y sequence and BMS! Great job!

[@kjakkakakka]

Where is the Y-sequence explained?

[@mynlm]

​@@kjakkakakka Starting from 6:36:25

[@TheRealHammyShark]

Googology. The G stands for Gem.

[@mynlm]

​@@kjakkakakkastarts from 6-36-25

[@aspenx-qc3rm]

wow, i’m fascinated by big numbers! thank you so much for this.
rayo’s number all the way at the end though 😭. the origin of that number was literally someone doing a challenge of making the biggest number. he really did a good job lmao.

[@N0URii]

19:10 am at this part and thinking "ok this cant be that long".. then i saw the time of the video "YO WTF IS THIS!!"

[@gashyrawr]

The already unfathomable Graham's number is merely around the 1h09min mark lol

[@이거외않됨]

I was one of the guy who watched it all and made it to the end without any skipping!! It helped me a lot,but can you make a Sequel that compares the sizes of infinity?if you do,it will help me a lot!thank you!

[@WoolyCow]

i was hoping the large number garden number would feature! it did at 9:53:25 (its the last pre-infinte entry btw), i remember one day reading the googology wiki and seeing a line like "it is so big and hard to understand that nobody but the creator does", sadly that line has since been removed, but it will always live on in my heart...being forever my fave big number, and the last 'non-ill-defined' one :D

[@Saber0931]

If you think about it, if there are infinte number of universe out there and infinite timelines, there are infinte number of YOU reading this exact comment using the exact same phone/ipad living in the EXACT same house HAVEING THE EXACT same memories HAVEING THE EXACT body as yours THINKING THE EXACT SAME THING as you are thinking rn and HAVING EVEY EVENT OF YOUR LIFE HAPPENING EXSCTLY THE SAME

[@AyanSharma-i9f]

yeagh

[@finndanielsun525]

milestones:
zero: 0:00
googol: 8:10
googolplex: 15:44
tritet jr. 16:04
googolplexian 21:40
29:53 giggol
31:30 tritri
35:21 giggolplex
42:28 gaggol
46:50 gaggolplex
51:25 geegol
54:40 geegolplex
57:45 gigol
1:00:16 goggol
1:01:56 gagol
1:03:54 tridecal
1:05:55 BOOGOL
1:09:21 grahams number [ all for now] :]

[@RubyPiec]

giggol, tritri, gaggol, boogol. Who names these?!

[@kirahen0437]

@@RubyPiec Bagel comes next, trust me bro

[@douglasshamlinjr.392]

those names were from Jonathan Bowers@@RubyPiec

[@finndanielsun525]

where can i find these?
@@douglasshamlinjr.392

[@Lobotomy132]

@@douglasshamlinjr.392 yes

[@swinger9374]

TREE(3) at 4:43:33

[@My_initials_are_O.G.cuz_I_am]

Thanks, I was looking for it and couldn't find it.

[@thefirstsurvivor]

wheres tree 4

[@BluJellu]

@@thefirstsurvivor Probably 4:44:09 right before TREE(1000) or Secundo-ominongulus because it says the growth rate of TREE.

[@unexpectedTrajectory]

I'm shocked they thought they knew where to place it it relation to these other systems?!...

[@rajveerkanojiya2985]

when tree 3 is at 4th hour in a 10 hour video you know it's so immensely large

[@wmpowell8]

Even a year after its publication, this video remains the most comprehensive number comparison to date. Congratulations on reaching one million views; you definitely deserve it! This man is a *REAL* googologist!

[@meepmeep4931]

Liked + Subscribed + Bell. This is astonishingly well done, and motivated me to learn about FGH. I now finally understand how Graham's number is generated, and I now understand the rules up to about the Epsilon-level era. This is some really fascinating stuff, thanks for turning me on to this!

[@christinahamilton7676]

I actually fell asleep while the video was playing, and I woke up a couple hours later and it was still playing. So I was like:
"God, how long is this video? WAIT IT'S 10 HOURS LONG ARE YOU KIDDING ME-"

[@gsas3012]

LMFAO 🤣

[@kacakci5870]

it didn't happened.

[@gsas3012]

@@kacakci5870 ?

[@Slav4o911]

Yeah I didn't even knew we have simple and somewhat exact notations for such big numbers. That video is just crazy.

[@Squog80085]

What number were you at

[@tehnoiceboi_the_real_one]

American hospitals when you fall over and hurt your knee:

[@theodriggers549]

So true.
A trillion dollars at this point is worth one cent.

[@vornamenachname906]

Is it really so expensive? I can't even imagine... I pay 150$ for my whole family per month in northern Europe lol

[@bobmcglobflob8113]

@@vornamenachname906 a broken shoulder is like 2 thousand dollars to treat

[@sergiomarc4826]

​@@bobmcglobflob8113that explains all those united-statian turists on private hospitals around here in Brazil... Medical tourism, i guess.

[@quirky.science]

​@@bobmcglobflob8113wtf bro?💀

[@-Deniz1117]

It really goes to show how insane infinity is, considering the fact that you will never get any closer to infinity no matter how big of a number you think of!

[@bryantofsomething5964]

What's even crazier is that infinity is only the 2nd smallest infinity lmfao

[@VOID_GENESIS]

Yeah it’s all fun and games till omega comes out@@bryantofsomething5964

[@Grandremone]

​@bryantofsomething5964 good point

[@knxcholx]

@@bryantofsomething5964 huh?

[@bryantofsomething5964]

@@knxcholx There are bigger types of infinity, such as aleph-1, aleph-2, aleph-3, etc.

[@BenMyFriendGaming]

Congrats on 8,000! I was your 8,000th sub!

[@douglasshamlinjr.392]

it's below 8000 now because youtube detected some suspicious subs like bots. (they are still subscribed, they just aren't counted), it'll probably be a day or so when i "really" get my 8000th sub.

[@BenMyFriendGaming]

@@douglasshamlinjr.392 ok 👍

[@BenMyFriendGaming]

@@douglasshamlinjr.392 Ok 👍

[@BenMyFriendGaming]

I just checked and you are actually at 8,000!🎉

[@NorbertKasko]

At least the person who made the video truly understand what's going on. He even provided some short explanations. Best video on the topic on TH-cam.

[@lxndr87i]

When I can't sleep, I don't count sheep. I count this!

[@who-ny5oe]

Good luck with that.

[@darthvader3889]

Like Sheldon Cooper when he went to the dentist?

[@davidcollacott]

Beavers are finally being recognized for their role in defining large numbers.

[@elenashasherina4417]

Angry beavers

[@TwentyOne71421]

Infinity is the effort put in this video, now you have an instant like

[@Randomizer.gaming]

All background changes
Part 1:
0:05 (Zero)
3:23 (One Million)
5:44 (One Octillion)
8:16 (Googol)
10:08 (Googolchime)
12:02 (Maximusmillion)
13:12 (Maximustrillion)
15:47 (Googolplex)
Part 2:
17:42 (Killillion)
19:36 (Tetralogue)
21:44 (Googolplexian)
24:39 (Pentalogue)
27:15 (Hexalogue)
30:00 (Giggol)
32:25 (Googolstack)
35:08 (Tria-taxis)
37:56 (Tetra-taxis)
41:55 (Deka-taxis)
Part 3:
46:48 (Tria-Petaxis)
51:23 (Deka-Petaxis)
54:40 (Tria-Exaxis)
57:43 (Deka-Exaxis)
1:00:17 (Deka-Eptaxis)
Part 4:
1:04:02 (Tridecal)
1:07:45 (Tridecalplex)
1:09:24 (Graham’s Number)
1:12:19 (Baddom)
1:14:36 (Traddom)
1:17:22 (Grand Tridecal)
1:20:05 (Unadd-Bultom)
1:22:39 (Trultom)
1:25:46 (Quadrultom)
1:29:31 (General)
Part 5 coming soon

[@6die9ne]

where part 5 at 😔

[@Stepan_H]

9:53:34 - If you actually watched the whole video and enjoyed it, then I highly recommend you consider seeing a psychiatrist. 🤪

[@normalcommenter8782]

2:55:18
So bad they don't have these classics at TacoBell anymore

[@raymax4960]

Thats the amount of diarrhea after you eat it

[@MikeJones-ny7yt]

Question for Douglas: Go the other direction. How many log base 3 operations would it take to reduce Graham's number to 1? Should inverse tetration be termed the tetralogarithm?

[@douglasshamlinjr.392]

Even for a smaller number like 3^^^3, you need to take the base-3 logarithm 7,625,597,484,987 times to reduce it to a one.
For 3^^^^3 = 3^^^(3^^^3), you need to do it 3^^^(3^^^3 - 1) times.
For inverse tetration operators, I've heard of the super-root and the super-logarithm.

[@TheRealHammyShark]

super-duper-root when

[@elenashasherina4417]

when super-duper-guper-root

[@fancykingkirby]

For all 3 people wondering
Universal Paperclips ends here: 7:05

[@Zeromus0]

💀

[@evanepic3599]

thats interesting

[@nhbons783]

11:15 the highest possible in clicker heroes is between this and the next.

[@bogdan_ostaficiuc]

i love the threnody of heros uprgade

[@robinpinar9691]

​@@nhbons78310^12,500?

[@NathanZona]

You deserve way more subscribers for the effort you put in.

[@Bill_W_Cipher]

Fun fact: There is a FANDOM for many of these numbers! Don't take my word for it. Look it up yourself. (You'll have more luck for the numbers in the list that are colored green).

[@Erlieee]

When you're looking at graham's number at the end but it's only at 1:09:21

[@elenashasherina4417]

"Oh hectillion no"

[@jamesburrelljr.8561]

You did the best anyone could do to keep us intellectually connected to the numbers, but I can't get pass the 17:23 minute mark. The numbers become unfathomable for me at that point.

[@ezio99ez]

Incredibly hypnotic. After about two hours I had to stop, because my dog had also taken a countable form...

[@elenashasherina4417]

"It was uncountable? How a hectillion it was infinite!"

[@Chillaxer599]

Finally, someone has counted all the genders.

[@YT-AleX-1337]

Extremely Underrated

[@DenusTheCircle_official]

fun fact:
this man counted 1 million+ times in discord, in channel "counting"

[@Jxmu.]

I've watched you since I was 8. I'm 13 now. I used to always watch the 2018 version so I love how we are getting a new one. God bless you Douglas

[@atomiste4312]

always nice to see someone this young be fascinated with maths, wishing you the best

[@peterwille8239]

@@atomiste4312thats normal

[@Stormtrooper_TK.5207]

God bless you! 💯😄✝️

[@Xnoob545]

​@@atomiste4312I'm the same, 14 and always had an interest in math

[@zedzilla]

The most amazing thing is that if you went all the way to the largest number here you would be as close to infinity as the number Zero

[@OzymandiasWasRight]

I swear, every year or so infinity breaks my brain in some new way. Congratulations! The winner for 2023 is this comment!

[@Blackfromstickworld]

​@@OzymandiasWasRightI have one for 2024 don't worry

[@jareknowak8712]

Sad truth.

[@Infinityc702]

Correction*-You would always be closer to zero than infinity.

[@OzymandiasWasRight]

@@Infinityc702 Do you only respond to comments about infinity or is this just a huge coincidence?

[@shamilton2556]

I thought i'd jump the first 90 minutes and my brain nearly fell out of my head. Brilliant.

[@chukwuderanwajagu6294]

Kudos to the person who made this video!

[@Bill_W_Cipher]

We need a sequel to this with all the types of infinities (yes, not all infinities are equal to each other).

[@randomthings379]

2:55:15 Legendary Explosive Edamame Taco 😂😂😂

[@pavelalalala8866]

tat's to funny😂

[@Hetpust]

1337

[@Orenotter]

I'll laugh so hard if this ends with -1/12.

[@mullah-edu]

why

[@dbomba]

​@@mullah-eduSomething about the Riemann Zeta function. Basically if you sum all the natural numbers up to infinity the result is -1/12 which apparently doesn't make any sense but it actually works in irl physics applications

[@InsightSplash1]

thanks to gemini or chatgpt. I know that it's a misconception that sum of all natural number is -1/12​@@dbomba

[@SoloLevellor]

​@@dbomba Fake

[@Zorian-z2x]

​@@dbomba not real because the sum is divergent

[@saimazh4003]

Underrated TH-camr, earned a sub

[@neoieo5832]

I've been watching for like 4 years already

[@Bill_W_Cipher]

Saying "Nuh-uh/Yeah-huh times [insert huge number]" just got a whole lot more interesting.

[@kularathnehasindu1575]

Guys, This is what dedication is.

[@Vinomix]

Had to Google a bunch of times 😮😅..
Thanks for taking the time and expanding my consciousness 🎉.
Cheers and keep up the good work..

[@mrredshark77]

finally expanded number list!!! i liked to watch :)

[@BAT4423HGB]

Hi shark eeee

[@paolarei4418]

Nice there are 2 large number users in this comment

[@ARandomGamer-nx1kv]

@@BAT4423HGBHi BAT4423 eeee

[@whythosenames]

4:59:40 secret message

[@whythosenames]

And 6:05:40

[@whythosenames]

6:10:15 where does the M come from

[@BluJellu]

@@whythosenames M is Mahlo

[@cindykramer3047]

my notation
m|10-10| = {10,10} = 10^10
m|10-10-10| = {10,10,10} = 10{10}10
m|10-10-10-10| = {10,10,10,10}
m|10-10(1)2| = {10,10[2]2}
m|10-10(1)1-2| = {10,10[2]1,2}
m|10-10(1)1(1)2} = {10,10[2]1[2]2}
m|10-10(2)2| = {10,10[3]2}
m|10-10(3)2| = {10,10[4]2}
m|10-10(-)2| = {10,10[1,2]2}
m|10-10(1-)2| = {10,10[2,2]2}
m|10-10(-1)2| = {10,10[1,3]2}
m|10-10(-(-))2| = {10,10[1,1,2]2}
m|10-10(-(-(-)))2| = {10,10[1,1,1,2]2}
m|10-10(--)2| = {10,10[1[2]2]2}
m|10-10(1--)2| = {10,10[2[2]2]2}
m|10-10(--1)2| = {10,10[1[2]3]2}
m|10-10(-1-)2| = {10,10[1[3]2]2}
m|10-10(-(-)-)2| = {10,10[1[1,2]2]2}
m|10-10(---)2|= {10,10[1[1[2]2]2]2}
m|10-10(|)2| = {10,10[1\2]2}
m|10-10(1|)2| = {10,10[2\2]2}
m|10-10(|(|))2| = {10,10[1[1\2]2\2]2}
m|10-10(|1)2| = {10,10[1\3]2}
m|10-10(|-)2| = {10,10[1\1,2]2}
m|10-10(|(|))2| = {10,10[1\1[1\2]2]2}
m|10-10(||)2| = {10,10[1\1\2]2}
m||10-10(||1)2| = {10,10[1\1\3]2}
m|10-10(|||)2| = {10,10[1\1\1\2]2}
m|10-10(/)2| = {10,10[1[2¬2]2]2}
5 likes and i will expand it to /1,2 hyperseperators

[@kevins7030]

Okay, I didn't watch the whole thing, and at 30 minutes I lost the ability to read the entries. But I'm still impressed as hell that this video exists.

[@fredschneider7475]

This is amazing, Douglas! By any chance, do you have this available to share in text or spreadsheet form?

[@douglasshamlinjr.392]

I made the numbers on powerpoint, but i also used after effects and hitfilm

[@fredschneider7475]

Awesome, is there any way you could share the text of it with me? If it exists in that form. I’m working on something related to googology. I could explain offline. Best, Fred

[@Griffith0106]

@@douglasshamlinjr.392 can you send me the ppt. please i am begging you

[@hggpi]

As somebody with 1700 hours in idle wizard. I agree

[@abtix]

And what's crazy is that the biggest number is yet infinitely closer to 0 than to infinity.

[@gpt-jcommentbot4759]

1*

[@nzqarc]

unless its a surreal or transfinite number, then it could be the other way around.

[@iamapokerface8992]

stolen

[@abtix]

@@iamapokerface8992 steal what, definition of infinity?💀

[@gpt-jcommentbot4759]

yes@@abtix

[@damedanedameyodamenanoyo2594]

I remember as a kid I used to think 99 was THE biggest number of all

[@hahahafiy]

And when I was a kid I thought centillion was the biggest number

[@vor0g]

I remember when I was around 3 or 4 years old I thought 99 was the largest number and here I am now seeing these numbers beyond comprehension

[@mrcool5126]

Watch this was an amazing journey, the best video i've ever watched about big numbers.

[@Torontodude20000]

I can’t believe chuck Norris counted to infinity twice by his 10th birthday.

[@GameSparkTV]

Very cool 😎 informative video on big numbers. Always fascinated by how much I like 👍 this type of content. Didn’t know there was different classes of numbers so I learned something new today. 😮wow about the other more interesting numbers that were way up beyond most comprehension of what the average person knows. And then ends the video most appropriate with infinity ♾️.
Kudos!!! Almost 😅 10 hours of numbers! I skipped ahead to the last few minutes instead after I reached the illion numbers. 😊

[@jeanpoolzapata3484]

0:03 One
8:14 Googol
14:04 SSCG(2)
15:44 Googolplex
21:39 Googolplexian
29:54 Giggol
30:19 Mega
31:29 Tritri
35:04 Tria-taxis
35:24 Giggolplex
42:29 Gaggol
44:49 g1
46:54 Gaggolplex
51:29 Geegol
54:44 Geegolplex
57:49 Gigol
1:00:19 Goggol
1:01:59 Gagol
1:03:59 Tridecal
1:05:49 Boogol
1:07:24 g2
1:08:24 g3
1:08:48 g4
1:09:24 Graham's Number
1:18:14 Biggol
1:22:59 Baggol
1:25:54 Beegol
1:27:14 Bigol
1:28:03 Boggol
1:28:34 Bagol
1:29:29 General
1:30:49 Troogol
1:45:13 Quadroogol
1:54:44 Quintoogol
2:00:09 Sextoogol
2:02:24 Septoogol
2:03:39 Octoogol
2:04:19 Iteral
2:06:34 Goobol
2:15:14 Gootrol
2:18:39 Gooquadrol
2:20:29 Gossol
2:24:34 Mossol
2:26:34 Bossol
2:29:04 Dubol
2:35:59 Xappol
2:44:34 Colossol
2:49:59 Terossol
2:54:44 Gongulus
3:01:19 Gingulus
3:05:44 Bongulus
3:10:29 Trongulus
3:12:59 Quadrongulus
3:14:59 Goplexulus
3:21:04 Goplexianus
3:23:09 Gotriplexulus
3:25:19 Goppatoth
3:34:19 SCG(1)
3:56:54 Triakulus
4:01:49 Kungulus
4:14:45 Quadrunculus
4:20:00 Tridecatrix
4:20:14 Humongulus
4:42:04 SCG(2)
4:43:29 TREE(3)
4:45:09 SSCG(3)
4:58:19 Golapulus

[@phaseblade]

It would be nice if the functions were categorized by "paradigm". To explain - and I'm probably using incorrect terminology but hopefully the point gets across - the vast majority of functions are "recursively constructive", meaning you start with N and then apply an arbitrarily-deeply recursive function to it. In contrast, TREE(N) is "reductive", meaning you start with an infinite set (all possible trees with nodes of N colors) and then take away elements that don't fit a rule.
It would be interesting to learn more about the functions that are NOT recursively constructive, because those require creativity to come up with.

[@yunusemrearslan.]

This video will be popular in future

[@aspenx-qc3rm]

6:05:38 i was not expecting mr.beast to be mentioned 😭

[@xenon9717]

Today I’m giving random strangers (large number garden number) dollars!!

[@aspenx-qc3rm]

@@xenon9717 LOL

[@ANTIESTABLISHMENTAL]

Not only is this amazing, it is also well explained, for some reason I can understand why the numbers are written in such ways, while at the same time I have no clue really, but OP has done such a great job with simple and comprehensive explanations that I find myself watching the whole thing. 👁

[@as7river]

Clearly forgot the countdown timer for when Half-Life 3 is released.

[@Andrian-yo3er]

The effort to make this video is beyond crazy

[@derflop]

Thanks to Cookie Clicker, I was familiar with all the number names up to unvigintillion 😅

[@anshulanshika7312]

The shocking thing is that if you were to choose a random positive no. , there are 99.9999999999.....% chances that it will be greater than the biggest no. displayed in this video

[@catalyst3713]

???

[@r.ndomperson]

​@@catalyst3713even the Garden number has an infinite amount of numbers in between it and infinity, resulting in a chance of whats essentially 0% to get a number smaller then it

[@gpt-jcommentbot4759]

I don't think that is that shocking. What's shocking for me is how absolutely gargantuan these numbers are, I have a fear of space, because of how lonely and hostile it is. Like if you travelled to Andromeda galaxy from the Milky Way, you would encounter basically nothing but near perfect void for (at least) 2.5 million years. But these numbers make those distances seem like atoms. Absolutely mindblowing.

[@Crazylom]

I dont get it

[@Wadethewallaby2001]

I wonder if Baldi would even try to comprehend the Numbers? Maybe that’s what Baldi was trying to say with his impossible question?

[@gpt-jcommentbot4759]

Baldi's numbers would sit at about 5:29:31, larger than Googol, Googolplex, Graham's Number and TREE(3). But smaller than SSCG(3), Loader's Number, Busy Beavers, and Rayo's Number.

[@Wadethewallaby2001]

@@gpt-jcommentbot4759 problem 3 *gibberish* = ?

[@gpt-jcommentbot4759]

@@Wadethewallaby2001 ?

[@Wadethewallaby2001]

@@gpt-jcommentbot4759 😡📕📒📔📓📗📘📙📚📏❌

[@W3746a]

I never completely understood fast growing hierarchies I thought it just ment the number would start at a number and just keep growing

[@windowlizard]

Dude… thank you 🙏

[@UIDaniel-n7w]

How and where did you get this. This is a masterpiece!

[@Soul-ux8ib]

...I'm gonna be honest. I got to the exponential era, and only then realized that the video was NINE HOURS.

[@meredithgordon541]

Actually 9:54:07
It says 10 hours on the thumbnail btw

[@JingleZBellZ]

"acksully" 🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓@@meredithgordon541

[@douglashtang]

Hi, how long did it take for TH-cam to upload and process this video? I read you wrote 3 hours for the rest of the stuff, but I second guess it should take even longer to process a 10 hour video up to full HD.

[@douglasshamlinjr.392]

the rest of the stuff is like making final edits and checking the video. It doesn't count video processing time

[@thisisthemansworld8704]

Good! Also like those backgrounds

[@douglasshamlinjr.392]

Nice, I got the idea of putting the backgrounds from the youtuber NO!, there's also a no-background version in the description.

[@reginha2010]

Congrats Douglas! You reached 1 million views in this video!
12-11-2024

[@krzysztofzajac4446]

damn...so you've finally reached this thing called infinity in 10 hours! ;)

[@Wadethewallaby2001]

That’s why buzz light-year was saying “to infinity and beyond.” 😂

[@Air_Cardinal]

I fell asleep and this was still going when I woke up in the morning. HOW?

[@mustafapehlivan5856]

this is the true masterpiece :)

[@inamgautam-pv4mf]

so close, yet so far to infinity

[@MisterGM_0210]

Thanks to the camerman for Holding the camera for almost 10 hrs!