I've been swimming in it - a memory Though I must admit it feels more like a bad dream One of the ones where I'm losing all of my teeth The ground underneath my feet The sound when I scream If all I have and all I know Are built upon a foundation That starts to crack, where can I go? Succumb to my creation Welcome annihilation Annihilation Such is salvation Annihilation I know my path is beyond the ashes No more being bound by earthly attachments When the thunder sounds and the lightning flashes I'll know God's around playing with Her matches Ashes, ashes, give them to me now My lungs are hot from the water that I've let in The ocean's not a place for perpetual treading Which part of the abyss should I pretend to head in? Burn it all instead then start again If all I have and all I know Are built upon a foundation That starts to crack, where can I go? Succumb to my creation Welcome annihilation Annihilation Such is salvation Annihilation I know my path is beyond the ashes Arici 🌙
Can someone tell me how this is Ai art? Like I don’t see no blurring lines or anything that looks out of the ordinary, they also linked a source on where they found the art from.
How? Please help me understand how this hurts the other artists, because the way I see it this simply removes them from the equation and removes another source of copyright strike
@@kyuokuo as i said before, AI generated image is made by taking arts from artist as its 'ingredients' I would've not mind if AI made the picture from scratch. But this is morally wrong and againts copyright to use one's artwork without permission nor agreement
Ngl artists are the most insufferable community imaginable. Ai art is just as ethical as you learning how to draw by looking at other peoples drawing. So unless you do not consume art at all you are basically doing the same thing. Its also just a completely different area thats occupied in the greater picture. Also it is not yet clear if its against copyright or not.
@@NewMetaTV may i know why do you think so about the art community? Also, if you're saying that referencing is the same as making AI generated pics, you're completely wrong.. Referencing is making something entirely new by taking other arts as example and guides. Whereare AI completly takes those arts and meshed it up into one picture. No handmade, no genuine art nor actual effort. I could say more why ai art is morally wrong, and againts copyright,, but i'd rather you to ask what do you want to know instead
@@r3r3ch4n this is indeed not how all ai systems work only the worst ones. Because artist are pretending that their field of work is the only one that should never be impacted by outside sources. Artists historically have complained about every single technological advancement ever or change of style to what they perceived to be “real art”. That went from photography to animation to digital or even things like collages and the such. Its the same cycle everytime. (All of this while most artists are part of the one of the most over privileged group). Also then sue if it breaks copyright so obviously , the reason why that is not feasible tho is because a) most databases actually aquired copyright use and b) its not really distinguishable what is from where because the system get insanely more sophisticated by the day.
Do not let people tell you how to do your things. Use picture sources whatever you want, its your channel! After all, you are sharing music, not pictures! You are doing it for years now and you are doing great job! Thank you!
Why? They have never paid for art before. Their use of AI does not harm other artists. The best part of AI art is that a salty artist cannot put a copyright claim on a video and make it disappear because of “reasons”
it's amazing to see those Ai haters still exist, really funny to see if you ask me 😂 it doesn't steal other people's art, grow up your mind so you don't get laughed at 🎉
Here's a hypothetical for you. Say I was to draw a picture based off of several other authors work, and claim it as my own. Does the effort to create the picture induce ownership upon it even if it is entirely not my own creation but an amalgamation of other authors styles and features? If yes then AI are literally doing the same thing, at a much faster pace, with little to no need to learn how to draw. If no then all human art based off of other peoples work will have to be scrutinized in the same way as you think AI art should be.
I've been swimming in it - a memory
Though I must admit it feels more like a bad dream
One of the ones where I'm losing all of my teeth
The ground underneath my feet
The sound when I scream
If all I have and all I know
Are built upon a foundation
That starts to crack, where can I go?
Succumb to my creation
Welcome annihilation
Annihilation
Such is salvation
Annihilation
I know my path is beyond the ashes
No more being bound by earthly attachments
When the thunder sounds and the lightning flashes
I'll know God's around playing with Her matches
Ashes, ashes, give them to me now
My lungs are hot from the water that I've let in
The ocean's not a place for perpetual treading
Which part of the abyss should I pretend to head in?
Burn it all instead then start again
If all I have and all I know
Are built upon a foundation
That starts to crack, where can I go?
Succumb to my creation
Welcome annihilation
Annihilation
Such is salvation
Annihilation
I know my path is beyond the ashes
Arici 🌙
Yoooo, this is insane
amazing voice
oooooo the bass on this gotta be killer
Bro, This complety fits with the Arcane Series 💣😈 🎉
sounds brilliant on a surround sound home system with subwoofer
Esta obra de arte me da poder 💪
Damn this is awesome, gonna be stuck in my head for a few days for sure
first :)
Good one 💥
Esse ano ta incrível começando com música insanas de boas ❤
Can someone tell me how this is Ai art? Like I don’t see no blurring lines or anything that looks out of the ordinary, they also linked a source on where they found the art from.
nice
Vanic!!!!!!!
Xkito got me through getting on lithium. And monstercat
🔥🔥🔥
the artwork gives me Keneki vibes
AI not artwork
What a dope song.
10/10
This is AI art again, sheesh.
I notice this is the second time you're using AI 'art'..
I hope you acknowledge how this is hurting the art community
How? Please help me understand how this hurts the other artists, because the way I see it this simply removes them from the equation and removes another source of copyright strike
@@kyuokuo as i said before, AI generated image is made by taking arts from artist as its 'ingredients'
I would've not mind if AI made the picture from scratch. But this is morally wrong and againts copyright to use one's artwork without permission nor agreement
Ngl artists are the most insufferable community imaginable. Ai art is just as ethical as you learning how to draw by looking at other peoples drawing. So unless you do not consume art at all you are basically doing the same thing. Its also just a completely different area thats occupied in the greater picture. Also it is not yet clear if its against copyright or not.
@@NewMetaTV may i know why do you think so about the art community?
Also, if you're saying that referencing is the same as making AI generated pics, you're completely wrong..
Referencing is making something entirely new by taking other arts as example and guides. Whereare AI completly takes those arts and meshed it up into one picture. No handmade, no genuine art nor actual effort.
I could say more why ai art is morally wrong, and againts copyright,, but i'd rather you to ask what do you want to know instead
@@r3r3ch4n this is indeed not how all ai systems work only the worst ones.
Because artist are pretending that their field of work is the only one that should never be impacted by outside sources. Artists historically have complained about every single technological advancement ever or change of style to what they perceived to be “real art”. That went from photography to animation to digital or even things like collages and the such. Its the same cycle everytime. (All of this while most artists are part of the one of the most over privileged group). Also then sue if it breaks copyright so obviously , the reason why that is not feasible tho is because a) most databases actually aquired copyright use and b) its not really distinguishable what is from where because the system get insanely more sophisticated by the day.
Do not let people tell you how to do your things. Use picture sources whatever you want, its your channel! After all, you are sharing music, not pictures! You are doing it for years now and you are doing great job! Thank you!
You're using AI art... how dissapointing..
Why? They have never paid for art before. Their use of AI does not harm other artists.
The best part of AI art is that a salty artist cannot put a copyright claim on a video and make it disappear because of “reasons”
@@kyuokuo you're missing the whole point here, do you know how AI generated image work? It stoles contents from other artist..
it's amazing to see those Ai haters still exist, really funny to see if you ask me 😂 it doesn't steal other people's art, grow up your mind so you don't get laughed at 🎉
Here's a hypothetical for you. Say I was to draw a picture based off of several other authors work, and claim it as my own. Does the effort to create the picture induce ownership upon it even if it is entirely not my own creation but an amalgamation of other authors styles and features?
If yes then AI are literally doing the same thing, at a much faster pace, with little to no need to learn how to draw. If no then all human art based off of other peoples work will have to be scrutinized in the same way as you think AI art should be.
How much i give a f...