This is a match-by-match thing.... remember THE final St. John's against Peterhouse, where we got the unforgettable "Do we know any german scientists, Oscar?" xD
@@jameshogan6142 She has also one of the most memorable and cutest blunders in years.... - How many years separate the Suez crisis and the 7 years war?.... "Six!... oh gosh no!"
It’s rare that both teams are so likeable but, in this case, they were. Darwin - Cambridge’s ability to actually work out the answer (e.g., at 4:56 and 12:02) was impressive, although they might have worked out or deduced other answers as well (e.g., “etz chaim” 19:34, _chaim_ being the Hebrew word for “life,” as we know from the toast-and the eponymous song from _Fiddler on the Roof-l’chaim_ [“To life”], and the reference work for which a quarter of a million illustrative examples were submitted 5:38-the _Britannica_ does not take illustrative examples but it’s well-known that the _OED_ has and still does). Then, again, I’ve never even _heard_ of the term _nixtamalization_ 9:25-but probably everyone else has-so I can’t be too judgmental. Congratulations to the winning team and condolences to the team that made the winning team possible-I had hoped we might see that team again but, obviously, only one team can proceed to the final.
May be I am catching on late, but is it often noticed that the third and final bonus question of a set is always a sitter? I don't think it was so regularly so back in the Paxster days - at least the middle years. It's like UC does it so that even the weaker teams might have some score on board than be tied at nought for nought. Kind of like grade inflation.
Yes. It’s the reason why the “repeat the one name you’ve heard in relation to this topic until it’s correct” strategy is often correct on the third try.
Good game! Would have loved to see Edinburgh winning but they just weren,t strong enough...a lot of uncertain dithering. Congrats to Darwin with Whitaker gallantly pushing them through the finishing line..great all round knowledge. Thanks CP!😊
Hello again! And what a great match! Very, very entertaining. The winning team just had a little bit more star power, especially in the person of their captain...who might just be the strongest individual contestant remaining in the competition. The losing team was very good, and I'm sad to see them go. The winning team will either win it all, or be a very tough out for whoever does. My best to both teams, and to each individual.
agreed, winning team which is Darwin Cambridge could be like the last years team lead by Wotton, he had 32 starter for 10's in just 5 matches, so Whitaker could see a similar fate where they win just 1 out of the 3 quarter finals hence couldnt qualify for the semi's, today as well apart from Whitaker there was only one other correct buzzer from his team and that was of Willis, so other then Whitaker the 3 contestant's together having only 1 correct Starter for Ten in 2 matches combined means that this team is literally a one man show. So if in any match Whitaker could only manage lets say 3 Starters then Darwins final score might not even be in 3 figures.
Darwin was a one man show. Nothing new in that. Lots of teams over the years have standouts. But, what surprises me about Harrison Whitaker is that he is actually from the US and solely in the duration of his PhD studies has soaked up a good bit of UK history and culture. Because, Terre Haute is such a world away - if you've ever been there, you'd know. Says on his linkedin that after his PhD, he's now setting questions officially on UC. From that, Sherlock Holmes style I'd say Darwin went out in the semis at best. UC wouldn't likely hire a winner. Would look too familiar, like a reality show than a prestige show. Some distance would seem he came out of a normal applicant pool. May be Whitaker has just been doing the quiz circuit rounds in his UK time and just heard a lot of these questions. Questions do tend to repeat across shows and even within UC. How many times do we hear Krebs cycle? Or something to do with Klint?
There was a team about six years ago whose captain was a chap named Leo and he was also a solo maestro but no matter how good an individual might be a balanced opposing team might just have the edge.
@@BlueSoulTiger not at all. I miss them. When I first discovered OC online I thought it was a bit extreme, and now it's all part of the experience. It was a very literal comment, not sarcastic.
What I really don't like about the Chistmas Specials is that went it ends Ithe first match come quickly but after I need to wait an entire week for the next one 😢
As usual, someone, somewhere is always shouting an answer... here: KREBS!! THE F**** D**** and C**** KREBS CYCLE!!!... (as a veterinarian, I *hated* to study that *** thing back in school, and again in university, AAAAARRRRGGGGHHH). Also SATIE!!!, and yes, what a save! O.O (But I know that because that thing is used like by tons of commercials during the 80s, god knows why... And I'll miss the "Nominate self" meme by now. =P
I'm a Biochemist and I hated having to learn that damn thing by heart. More than 20 years ago and what I still remember has only proved tangentially useful knowledge once.
I can understand why he said Saint Saens at first, the arrangement made it sound very Saint Saens. My immediate reaction was that it was Carnival of the Animals.
i hope so, winning atleast two games against much tougher opponents single handedly is not going to be easy 😂 he might require some help from rest of the 3 members combined
Today apart from Whitaker there was only one other correct buzzer from his team and that was of Willis, so other then Whitaker the rest of the 3 contestant's from Darwin could only manage 1 correct Starter for Ten in 2 matches combined, this shows that this team is literally a one man show. So if in any match Whitaker could only manage lets say 3 Starters then Darwins final score might not even be in 3 figures.
I follow your logic. If Whitaker answers three starters and the team answer all of the bonuses that leaves them with a score of 85 points. That is hardly a winning total. However he is likely to answer six or more starters.
@jameshogan6142 you made a mistake, it will be 75 not 85. because 3 starters will given you 9 bonus questions in total thats 3 each time and a single bonus question gives you 5 points so 5×9=45 and 30 points for 3 starter for 10's so 45+30=75. and to you answer your next point about him scoring atleast six or seven Questions, well best players of last season were Wotton and Justin Lee and there lowest starter's in a single match were 3 (Wotton) and 2 (Justin Lee), both had 9 starter for 10's in other game, even Jones of Imperial had a best of 9 correct starter of 10's in a match and his lowest was just 1 correct starter for 10. so what i am trying to say is that if in any match questions dont fall for Whitaker then dont be surprised to see a below par performance from him, but i agree that the probability of him scoring more than 5 in a match is higher then him scoring just 3 or 4
Honestly!! ANSWER: "Dorothy Hodgkins" ... Amol says: "I'm sorry, I cannot take that answer, which is Dorothy Hodgkin". Someone needs to get out more!!!
Man Whitaker is an absolute beast. Superb range of knowledge. Well done Darwin, definitely one of the contenders to be the finalist
This is a match-by-match thing.... remember THE final St. John's against Peterhouse, where we got the unforgettable "Do we know any german scientists, Oscar?" xD
@@ubiergo1978 He needs his teammates when they go against tougher opponents. If Whitaker has an off-day, Darwin are cooked
@@ubiergo1978 That was a complete whitewash for sure and who could ever forget the serene Hannah Woods?
@@jameshogan6142 She has also one of the most memorable and cutest blunders in years....
- How many years separate the Suez crisis and the 7 years war?.... "Six!... oh gosh no!"
Edinburgh seems to be the more well-balanced team overall but Whittaker is just too strong.
"Is it China?" - "No, it's Taiwan."
Indeed. Indeed it is.
Taiwan is fortunately not part of China
You are banned from entering China
@@ianlumley6474 Taiwan IS China 😊
@@ianlumley6474 Amol's social credits are into the negative now
Aiton has my heart, and his tone of voice? Simply irresistible!
Nominate Self 😵💫
Anti-conferring spoiler wall
_NO CONFERRING_
@@theyruinedyoutubeagain YOU MAY NOT CONCUR!
YOU MAY NOT CONFER!!!
Here’s 3 laughs for each reply 😂😂😂
haha I totally forgot the Christmas special episodes were over.
i was desperately waiting for this to resume, the wait was worth it
Liked both teams here, very sad to see the losing team go home. Against a different team they may well have pulled through
man Whitaker is a beast on the buzzer
Beautiful match! Congrats to the winners. Things are heating up for sure! Thank you, CP, for our Monday treat!
Liked the Edinburgh team but they took too long confering and 2nd guessed themselves out of a clozer contest.
It’s rare that both teams are so likeable but, in this case, they were.
Darwin - Cambridge’s ability to actually work out the answer (e.g., at 4:56 and 12:02) was impressive, although they might have worked out or deduced other answers as well (e.g., “etz chaim” 19:34, _chaim_ being the Hebrew word for “life,” as we know from the toast-and the eponymous song from _Fiddler on the Roof-l’chaim_ [“To life”], and the reference work for which a quarter of a million illustrative examples were submitted 5:38-the _Britannica_ does not take illustrative examples but it’s well-known that the _OED_ has and still does). Then, again, I’ve never even _heard_ of the term _nixtamalization_ 9:25-but probably everyone else has-so I can’t be too judgmental.
Congratulations to the winning team and condolences to the team that made the winning team possible-I had hoped we might see that team again but, obviously, only one team can proceed to the final.
Fantastic match and the winners had a powerful captain! As ever, thank you CP!
May be I am catching on late, but is it often noticed that the third and final bonus question of a set is always a sitter? I don't think it was so regularly so back in the Paxster days - at least the middle years. It's like UC does it so that even the weaker teams might have some score on board than be tied at nought for nought. Kind of like grade inflation.
Yes. It’s the reason why the “repeat the one name you’ve heard in relation to this topic until it’s correct” strategy is often correct on the third try.
Whitaker appreciation comment.
Good game! Would have loved to see Edinburgh winning but they just weren,t strong enough...a lot of uncertain dithering. Congrats to Darwin with Whitaker gallantly pushing them through the finishing line..great all round knowledge. Thanks CP!😊
Great to see the other Darwin contestants getting some points
UNIVERSITY CHALLENGE S54E20
MATCH STATS BELOW
Apologies for publishing these late.
Darwin - Cambridge: 155
Edinburgh: 125 Eliminated
Starter Questions Stats
DARWIN - CAMBRIDGE: 90
McClelland = 0/1
Willis = 1/1 {10 points}
Whitaker = 8/10 {80 points}
Stewart = 0
Starter Success rate: 75.00% (9/12)
EDINBURGH: 75
Aiton = 4/5 {40 minus 5 points}
Mellor = 1/1 {10 points}
Myles = 2/2 {20 points}
Self = 1/1 {10 points}
Starter Success rate: 88.89% (8/9)
Bonus Questions Stats
DARWIN - CAMBRIDGE: 65
Bonus success rate: 48.15% (13/27)
EDINBURGH: 50
Bonus success rate: 43.48% (10/23)
Thank you so much,
i was revisiting comments to find you and finally found you, better late then never
Hello again! And what a great match! Very, very entertaining. The winning team just had a little bit more star power, especially in the person of their captain...who might just be the strongest individual contestant remaining in the competition. The losing team was very good, and I'm sad to see them go. The winning team will either win it all, or be a very tough out for whoever does. My best to both teams, and to each individual.
agreed, winning team which is Darwin Cambridge could be like the last years team lead by Wotton, he had 32 starter for 10's in just 5 matches, so Whitaker could see a similar fate where they win just 1 out of the 3 quarter finals hence couldnt qualify for the semi's, today as well apart from Whitaker there was only one other correct buzzer from his team and that was of Willis, so other then Whitaker the 3 contestant's together having only 1 correct Starter for Ten in 2 matches combined means that this team is literally a one man show. So if in any match Whitaker could only manage lets say 3 Starters then Darwins final score might not even be in 3 figures.
Thanks for the upload. From Aotearoa!
Wow, very impressive match. Thank you for posting! 🏆🏆
What a match, I think the AO question was the climax, Whittaker’s saved Darwin
Thank you CP!
Finally, I got to watch Mr. Whitaker in action again :D such a beast on the buzzer‼️
He could win the competition almost singlehandedly but if they come up against the like of Bristol it will require more than a one man show.
I got the Satie question--but, for a very odd reason. I remembered the music from a very old Chicago record album.
Chicago? Are you sure you're not thinking of Blood, Sweat & Tears' second album? (Also my introduction to Satie).
You are right!
Whittaker vs 4 people. Whittaker wins
I am looking forward to Bristol vs Whittaker.
Darwin was a one man show. Nothing new in that. Lots of teams over the years have standouts. But, what surprises me about Harrison Whitaker is that he is actually from the US and solely in the duration of his PhD studies has soaked up a good bit of UK history and culture. Because, Terre Haute is such a world away - if you've ever been there, you'd know. Says on his linkedin that after his PhD, he's now setting questions officially on UC. From that, Sherlock Holmes style I'd say Darwin went out in the semis at best. UC wouldn't likely hire a winner. Would look too familiar, like a reality show than a prestige show. Some distance would seem he came out of a normal applicant pool. May be Whitaker has just been doing the quiz circuit rounds in his UK time and just heard a lot of these questions. Questions do tend to repeat across shows and even within UC. How many times do we hear Krebs cycle? Or something to do with Klint?
There was a team about six years ago whose captain was a chap named Leo and he was also a solo maestro but no matter how good an individual might be a balanced opposing team might just have the edge.
Two good teams & a close match. Thanks to CP.
Thanks Cosmic P. Nice to have the regular games back, although the "old timers" were fun!
All I could think of in the second picture round was "oh God... I should know this... my friend has written books about her..."
Thank you.
Good game, thank you!
I'm betting on Edinburgh
...and immediately realised that Whitaker is a total beast
They were also my favourite team but alas.
Whitaker, I am the stalling police and I see you.
Hahah nominate self always cracks me up
Where is the match stats person? Am i showing up before them now?!
Hope you're not taking the stats people for granted - it must be a lot of work.
@@BlueSoulTiger not at all. I miss them. When I first discovered OC online I thought it was a bit extreme, and now it's all part of the experience. It was a very literal comment, not sarcastic.
Tl;dr
Whitaker - lots
Last names only! What's so hard about this?
I really would have liked to hear what the rest of the “there’s something about the Johnsons” clue 😂
Thank you!!
What I really don't like about the Chistmas Specials is that went it ends Ithe first match come quickly but after I need to wait an entire week for the next one 😢
an early final
As usual, someone, somewhere is always shouting an answer... here: KREBS!! THE F**** D**** and C**** KREBS CYCLE!!!... (as a veterinarian, I *hated* to study that *** thing back in school, and again in university, AAAAARRRRGGGGHHH). Also SATIE!!!, and yes, what a save! O.O (But I know that because that thing is used like by tons of commercials during the 80s, god knows why... And I'll miss the "Nominate self" meme by now. =P
I'm a Biochemist and I hated having to learn that damn thing by heart. More than 20 years ago and what I still remember has only proved tangentially useful knowledge once.
I can understand why he said Saint Saens at first, the arrangement made it sound very Saint Saens. My immediate reaction was that it was Carnival of the Animals.
Whitaker is so handsome though
whitaker will carry them to semis at least
i hope so, winning atleast two games against much tougher opponents single handedly is not going to be easy 😂 he might require some help from rest of the 3 members combined
Today apart from Whitaker there was only one other correct buzzer from his team and that was of Willis, so other then Whitaker the rest of the 3 contestant's from Darwin could only manage 1 correct Starter for Ten in 2 matches combined, this shows that this team is literally a one man show. So if in any match Whitaker could only manage lets say 3 Starters then Darwins final score might not even be in 3 figures.
I follow your logic. If Whitaker answers three starters and the team answer all of the bonuses that leaves them with a score of 85 points. That is hardly a winning total. However he is likely to answer six or more starters.
@jameshogan6142 you made a mistake, it will be 75 not 85.
because 3 starters will given you 9 bonus questions in total thats 3 each time and a single bonus question gives you 5 points so 5×9=45 and 30 points for 3 starter for 10's so 45+30=75.
and to you answer your next point about him scoring atleast six or seven Questions, well best players of last season were Wotton and Justin Lee and there lowest starter's in a single match were 3 (Wotton) and 2 (Justin Lee), both had 9 starter for 10's in other game, even Jones of Imperial had a best of 9 correct starter of 10's in a match and his lowest was just 1 correct starter for 10. so what i am trying to say is that if in any match questions dont fall for Whitaker then dont be surprised to see a below par performance from him, but i agree that the probability of him scoring more than 5 in a match is higher then him scoring just 3 or 4
Whitaker hates astronomy
@15:47 Hodgkin vs. HodgkinS. Way too harsh.
Edinburgh were lucky with the musical question on Saite. The captain had already answered but Rajan gave them a second bite of the cherry.
I don't think I've ever crushed on a contestant as much as I am on Caitlin Self.
Self-love?
I prefer Mellor
13:10 Picture Of An Exhibition
Pictures (plural) AT an Exhibition.
Honestly!! ANSWER: "Dorothy Hodgkins" ... Amol says: "I'm sorry, I cannot take that answer, which is Dorothy Hodgkin". Someone needs to get out more!!!
Honestly these sorta disallowed answers have been so ridiculous recently.
Agreed
When you're doing a PhD on films you have all the time in the world to accumulate as much as you want
Get rid of Roger!
Never! But yes, there was a keenness to jump the gun in this match.
I’d love to see the host go…
Roger certainly featured large in this episode.
'Charles Darwin would be proud' - maybe, but the College is not named after him specifically.