Windows 11 vs Linux Mint vs Manjaro KDE vs Fedora 35 - Speed Test!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ก.ค. 2024
  • Benchmarking Windows 11 vs Linux! Some side-by-side speed testing including boot speed, rendering, and transfers. Additionally, we will cover some synthetic benchmarking.
    Set up your own Linux server with LINODE : www.linode.com/techhut
    $100 - 60 day credit on new Linode accounts for TechHut viewers.
    Full Details: link coming soon, for now look below
    Windows 11: browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/...
    Linux Mint: browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/...
    Fedora: browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/...
    Manjaro: browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/...
    TH-cam MEMBER: bit.ly/members-techhut
    BECOME PATREON: bit.ly/patreon-techhut
    JOIN DISCORD: bit.ly/discord-techhut
    FOLLOW ME: bit.ly/twitter-techhut
    INSTAGRAM: bit.ly/personal-insta
    My Workstation (PAID LINKS)
    RYZEN 7 3700X: amzn.to/31BfO35​​ASUS
    PRIME X570-P: amzn.to/2HeKhNh​​
    G.SKILL Trident Z Neo: amzn.to/347eZAz​​
    WD Blue SN550 1TB: amzn.to/3o2RQan​​
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 692

  • @TechHut
    @TechHut  2 ปีที่แล้ว +58

    Set up your own Linux server with LINODE : www.linode.com/techhut
    $100 - 60 day credit on new Linode accounts for TechHut viewers.

    • @s.facih14
      @s.facih14 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      thank you so much
      I hope you can add an Arabic translation
      I'm following you, but we don't know English. Thank you in advance, sir

    • @thefirehawk1495
      @thefirehawk1495 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      As I watched the results, having made similar tests myself, I was in awe at how much variation you found. But then it hit me, your numbers are consistent with Ryzen pre-patch, check your video description and there it is, Ryzen as I suspected. You probably weren't fully updated on Windows 11.

    • @jacov_776
      @jacov_776 ปีที่แล้ว

      bro you looks like Magomed Ankalaev, russian ufc fighter

  • @keithprice1950
    @keithprice1950 2 ปีที่แล้ว +435

    The fact that all the Linux distros are free and don't require you to upgrade your PC or sign up to use them is the big win.

    • @FeedScrn
      @FeedScrn 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      Yes for a home-user. If you're looking for a computer job - it's best to know Windows and Linux... and how to program on both.

    • @unknown_codec_404
      @unknown_codec_404 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      @@FeedScrn Who don't know how to use Windows?

    • @FeedScrn
      @FeedScrn ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@unknown_codec_404 - Agreed.

    • @SoundblasterYT
      @SoundblasterYT ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@gomes-fonseca disagree. FOSS is a clear exception to that rule because all tracking is public.

    • @its_maalik
      @its_maalik ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@FeedScrn People who know how to use Linux will do just fine with Windows.

  • @beregg9159
    @beregg9159 2 ปีที่แล้ว +518

    Now give us a AmogOS benchmark comparison

    • @evildragon1774
      @evildragon1774 2 ปีที่แล้ว +81

      Now that is a sus comparison

    • @F00dCHAiN
      @F00dCHAiN 2 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      Wholesome keanu chungus approves this message

    • @sql64
      @sql64 2 ปีที่แล้ว +70

      openSUSE vs AmogOS

    • @moister3727
      @moister3727 2 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      in a aSus computer

    • @itzmeshervin
      @itzmeshervin 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Pretty sus

  • @chair-mander
    @chair-mander 2 ปีที่แล้ว +486

    Would have liked to see a comparison of DirectX on Windows and Vulkan on Linux (or even better Vulkan on both) - OpenGL just sucks in general and it doesn't really matter to me which platform does slightly worse in it. Vulkan and DirectX however are both great APIs and would be a better performance comparison. Other than that, great overview and testing :)

    • @etaashmathamsetty7399
      @etaashmathamsetty7399 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Opengl used to the only thing u had on Linux

    • @chair-mander
      @chair-mander 2 ปีที่แล้ว +73

      @@etaashmathamsetty7399 Sure, but it's not anymore and in pretty much every benchmark OpenGL is far worse than Vulkan, so I don't see the point. It's like saying "oh in Linux we used to only have the terminal and no GUI so why would anyone do benchmarks with GUIs".
      I'm not saying that he shouldn't have done any OpenGL benchmarks, just that I'd have liked to *also* see Vulkan benchmarks.

    • @etaashmathamsetty7399
      @etaashmathamsetty7399 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@chair-mander I wasn't really trying to prove anything and I agree with you, but vulkan still isin't super widely used and devs prefer to use directx. (also there's less hardware support for vulkan) I do think that vulkan is better, but those idiots are still to stubborn to switch to the more versatile vulkan. I think they feel that if they add vulkan, they have to add opengl too.

    • @chair-mander
      @chair-mander 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@etaashmathamsetty7399 Ah I see! My bad for misreading then :) For DirectX apps though Vulkan performance is still great because of DXVK

    • @keranavca
      @keranavca 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      now this zink for open gl on linux works similar to what dxvk does with vulkan

  • @Sintoolkicks
    @Sintoolkicks 2 ปีที่แล้ว +821

    Imagine how much faster Windows would be without all that spyware

    • @orkhepaj
      @orkhepaj 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      what spyware?

    • @affyne
      @affyne 2 ปีที่แล้ว +192

      @@orkhepaj u must be a windows/ms user

    • @orkhepaj
      @orkhepaj 2 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      @@affyne it is the best os so far

    • @cooltwittertag
      @cooltwittertag 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      The thing slowing it down in the Graphics tests us always OpenGL

    • @aladdin8623
      @aladdin8623 2 ปีที่แล้ว +134

      @@orkhepaj For spying, undermining the user's control and building up a dependency cage etc.?
      Well then for sure it is one of the best OSes.

  • @riseabove3082
    @riseabove3082 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Great video and great comparisons. In all, I would say they all are so very close that not one was the better than any other in overall. That's a good thing.

  • @henrikandersen7778
    @henrikandersen7778 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What a great comparison! Thank you very much!

  • @idtyu
    @idtyu 2 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    Fedora is fast mostly because how vanilla the packages and the kernel, and how well mutter, wayland and flatpak is integrated into it.

  • @cristian-navarro-88
    @cristian-navarro-88 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excelent video Bro! and congratulations on your baby!!

  • @mrcolo.
    @mrcolo. ปีที่แล้ว +2

    0:48 lol this is the clip of my Dell R710 server I recorded and published on pexels. Glad you liked and used it 😅

  • @jgsource552
    @jgsource552 2 ปีที่แล้ว +56

    You will really see the difference in preformance when you do this bench mark on a low -mid end system.

    • @emeukal7683
      @emeukal7683 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I actually got a Thinkpad problem and therefore I own laptop from t61 to t480s. I tried win10 vs Linux on every one of those and I can say: no you don't, if you put 8gb of RAM in them and use Gnome which is the defacto workstation choice. Using a tiling WM of course it feels snappier a bit beating out Windows and osx (i got a Mac too and acess to some more. Osx got the most slowed down with the last decade).

    • @Hardcore_Remixer
      @Hardcore_Remixer 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah, but compare Stripped versions of Linux like Mint xfce with Windows 10 LTSC, Superlite or Ghost Specter if you wanna make it fair.

    • @fabricio4794
      @fabricio4794 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Hardcore_Remixer Xerife Tech is that you?hahaha,his isos helped me a lot with Virtual Machines,when i run some Windows Isolated App,inside my Linux Workflow.....

  • @gamerking64
    @gamerking64 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    1:44 i love your hand movement when showing us the USB!

  • @22oreos
    @22oreos 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thanks for making these kinds of videos for us.

  • @TheWilldrick
    @TheWilldrick 2 ปีที่แล้ว +74

    Neat to see, though using Flatpak basically nullifies testing advantages and disadvantages of each distro's core libs and platform files. Also, even though I don't use it, it's weird not seeing Clear or Solus here, it's the posterchild of the linux drag race.

  • @sebastianwendl603
    @sebastianwendl603 2 ปีที่แล้ว +66

    As a dual-booting Mint user who mainly uses his PC for web-browsing (Mint) and gaming (Win 10): These results look good. Completely by chance picked the right Distro for the job :D
    Also: It is pretty noob-friendly. So that's definitely also a plus.

    • @Hardcore_Remixer
      @Hardcore_Remixer 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mr.mastermind4840 Yeah, it may get stuck when you play a modded game 🤪

    • @bajablink
      @bajablink ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@hahaitsme found bill gates account

    • @notyourfox
      @notyourfox ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Same here! I used to use Windows before, but when I just switched to Linux, I started to really hate nearly all Microsoft for well-known reasons. My first ever use of Linux Mint was the biggest relief in my life.

    • @a_plastic_bag
      @a_plastic_bag ปีที่แล้ว

      I wish I could use Mint but it shuts itself every time I try to use the latest nvidia driver with the latest kernel version 😢 been a while since I tried, maybe I should try again

    • @jacobnunya808
      @jacobnunya808 ปีที่แล้ว

      Don't you have to restart your computer every time you want to switch tasks?

  • @Outfrost
    @Outfrost 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    I would love to see a deep dive into what plays into these performance differences. For example if you profiled some of these applications to see which calls take longer, what versions of libraries they call into, how much time syscalls contribute, etc.

    • @kupas2
      @kupas2 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      windows is in the middle for opening big file.:
      OS, idling, firefox+libreoffice, open big file
      opensusetumbleweed, 1366 MB, +1512 MB, 47 s
      ubuntu 23.10, 1720 MB, +1336 MB, 1:11 s
      endeavouros, 2220 MB, +1514 MB, 1:21 s
      fedora, 2188 MB, +1187 MB, 1:24 s
      rocky, 1852 MB, +1724 MB, 1:25 s
      mx, 1190 MB, +1884 MB, 1:40 sd
      windows 10 2GB SSD, 550 MB, +405 MB, 1:45 s
      ghost, 1179 MB, +1139 MB, 1:53 s
      linuxmint, 919 MB, +1781 MB, 2:07 s
      debian, 2034 MB, +1873 MB, 2:15 s
      solus, 629 MB, +1900 MB, 2:29 s
      ubuntu 12.04, 1269 MB, +3412 MB, 4:15 s
      openbsd, 1329 MB, +1973 MB , 5:08 s

  • @uMalice
    @uMalice ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for the comparisons with my favorite distros!

  • @henrymach
    @henrymach 2 ปีที่แล้ว +136

    I'm actually impressed by Mint's performance.
    Question: Did you disable the spectre/meltdown mitigations on your Linux boxes?

    • @catalinaleon8040
      @catalinaleon8040 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      tengo ordenador no tengo

    • @catalinaleon8040
      @catalinaleon8040 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      eso no veo entonces no quiero tener

    • @catalinaleon8040
      @catalinaleon8040 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      veo que ya no veo no sé que no veo y no puedo tener ordenador porque no tengo

    • @BLAZE-gu1hu
      @BLAZE-gu1hu 2 ปีที่แล้ว +35

      @@catalinaleon8040 what the...

    • @fedpo6022
      @fedpo6022 2 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      @@catalinaleon8040 that sentence doesnt make sense.... ni siquiera en español

  • @NovemberOrWhatever
    @NovemberOrWhatever ปีที่แล้ว +69

    One of the speed advantages of Linux that you didn't test was shutdown time. It's weirdly slow on Windows, and Mint feels like 5x faster. It doesn't matter if you're just shutting your computer down for the night, but it's really nice if you want to reboot

    • @Blinknone
      @Blinknone ปีที่แล้ว +9

      When you "shut down" windows, it creates a hibernation file to make the next startup faster.. Its not a apples/apples comparison. you can disable fast startup if you want shutdown to run faster.

    • @NovemberOrWhatever
      @NovemberOrWhatever ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@Blinknone I didn't know that, interesting. I assume disabling it would make the next startup slower, so it'll be bad for reboot time either way.

    • @summertube1
      @summertube1 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@NovemberOrWhatever hahaha😂

    • @fulconandroadcone9488
      @fulconandroadcone9488 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Blinknone isn't hibernate supposed to be for that and shutdown just do the regular shutdown? I could never figure that one out, you need special kind of shutdown to make a startup faster?

    • @shadow20482
      @shadow20482 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@fulconandroadcone9488 they changed the shutdown, now it does the same thing hibernate does

  • @galactustales
    @galactustales 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Well using Flatpak version could have been an issue..

  • @seguramlk
    @seguramlk 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice man. Keep it up 👍

  • @munchiess26
    @munchiess26 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    it was a very clean and understandable explanation, good job

  • @venompire
    @venompire 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    One note - when you analyze how fast something is happening it would be helpful to see what is load on the system (some sort of process monitor)

  • @homesteadishdad
    @homesteadishdad 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    I've been thinking about switching from Linux Mint to Fedora, and this shows some very interesting information. I like Mint and how fast it is, but the UI on Fedora seems to be more user friendly without giving up too much speed.

    • @joaoguilhermezatiribeiro6060
      @joaoguilhermezatiribeiro6060 ปีที่แล้ว

      I needed to change because my dell G15 laptop dont accepted another screen with hdmi. Fedora just worked... But what I do is have a major system and use a virtual machine, so if I do mistakes I just delete it...

    • @ashishkushwaha6430
      @ashishkushwaha6430 ปีที่แล้ว

      How about features in mint compare to Ubuntu and manjaro???

    • @patapooka
      @patapooka 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      or tumbleweed

  • @carlvictor
    @carlvictor ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice video, man!

  • @mahlerstitan3797
    @mahlerstitan3797 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I think it would be cool to see a comparison with different init systems. Like arch vs artix with runit, openrc etc.

  • @chinmaykhare7246
    @chinmaykhare7246 2 ปีที่แล้ว +55

    Thanks for this. It would have been good to include windows 10 test as well as the people who are thinking of upgrading will get to know the difference

    • @psour33
      @psour33 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Windows 10 seems faster to me compared to Windows 11.

    • @space0015
      @space0015 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@psour33 opposite for me

    • @psour33
      @psour33 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@space0015 Did you upgrade from W10 or made a fresh install ? I upgrade here.

    • @cooltwittertag
      @cooltwittertag 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@psour33 On my PC I don't feel a different, but my old Surface feels more fluid with Windows 11

  • @umidyusupov103
    @umidyusupov103 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great review. But it would be great if you add something that indicates task completion. Check, Numbers or whatever that shows the order which distribution completed a task. AFAIK there used to be such things in previous reviews. Again, great comparison! )

  • @alexIVMKD
    @alexIVMKD 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very nice comparison!

  • @fragmale7262
    @fragmale7262 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Fantastic video! Would've been curious to see windows 10 added in the comparison, specifically with the graphics tests. There were changes in the way graphics are handled between 10 and 11, supposedly to make 11 faster, and I'm curious where that would've put the differentiation between 10, 11, and the linux distros.

  • @Techkomsan
    @Techkomsan 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing Benchmark, that's your choices👍👍👍👍

  • @uberdonkey9721
    @uberdonkey9721 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great comparison and well presented. Been using mint since it started, and always looking for alternatives (I use for work, kdenlive but not gaming) and still choosing mint.

  • @ganjamangaaiaaai9396
    @ganjamangaaiaaai9396 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Tnx for making this. Dude ! 💯✅👍🏿

  • @mayoonmayoon1685
    @mayoonmayoon1685 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Make a speed test between OPENSUSE TUMBLEWEED vs FEDORA 35 Gnome it would be really interesting...

  • @lordmoose213
    @lordmoose213 2 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    It worth mentioning that these benchmarks were run on an rx580 (hey thats my card!) and the reason that OpenGL apps ran so bad compared to linux on windows is AMDs fault for having a terrible OpenGL implementation in their windows drivers.

    • @keit99
      @keit99 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      We just don't use their implementations on linux

    • @ajtatosmano2
      @ajtatosmano2 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Mike Valadez actually, he mentioned that opengl is probably a disadvantage for win11. the cs:go, blender render and geekbench are all good and representative tests.

    • @tralphstreet
      @tralphstreet 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @Mike Valadez Yeah! What a guy! He cherry picked OpenGL scores to make Windows look bad... and then proceeded to show DirectX performance to make it look good? I mean, it was pretty impartial, there were no biases here.

  • @zerodayw0rk964
    @zerodayw0rk964 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    What file system did Mint and Manjaro use for the bench marking? I wonder if the file system also affects the file read/write and even execution speed.

  • @TheDesvendador
    @TheDesvendador 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Hi, Techy, could you do a video on distros recommended to use with NVIDIA cards?
    I'm having a hard time with a rtx 2060 laptop on Fedora 34 with Wayland, whenever I plugin an HDMI cable the whole system freezes, the only way out is the power button :/

  • @moister3727
    @moister3727 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    There's a difference in speed between Manjaro and EndevourOS? And if DE's can impact in graphical performance, for example GNOME vs LXDE or something like that.

  • @FengLengshun
    @FengLengshun 2 ปีที่แล้ว +54

    Huh, is there no DXVK or Vulkan-based graphics benchmark tools? While Windows with Direct X is usually at the top, Linux with Vulkan/DXVK usually comes in a punching distance from the comparisons I've seen (though those are oriented to gaming). And I wonder what exactly causes all the differences between each systems though - I guess it's whatever services and process they have on the background (which includes the DE but I wonder if libraries can causes variance) as well as how they build their kernels?
    Very interesting benchmark nonetheless, though. Been using Win11 in a VM, and so far it seems to go well as a VM OS over Win10. If I ever install it as a secondary OS, it'll be on the day when I get off my ass to actually do an Arch + Win11 install.

    • @moister3727
      @moister3727 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah, I was wondering the same. It usually perfoms better native Vulkan builts on Linux rather than Windows anyway.
      It also heavly depends on the game too.

    • @kurosakiht
      @kurosakiht 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      do it man, I have my Arch + Win 11 on my laptop for a month now and it's great. Do everything on Arch and only have to hop to Windows for very specific task that I can't do on Arch

  • @QuestionTheTruth
    @QuestionTheTruth ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You could test Nobara and different browsers with every system to display which one is the fastest option. The tests felt simple and not really conclusive. Which kernels were the operating systems on? Which version were you using? etc.

  • @joe8663
    @joe8663 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I would like to have heard more about the system you ran this on, are they bare metal, by the bios splash I guess so. But, also would like to see 4-way mix and match hardware compare with AMD & Intel CPUs and Nvidia & AMD GPUs (all similar gen with sim benches), with the linux distros sporting comps for open source vs proprietary drivers. Lets get right to the bacon! lol. But, great video! Especially liked the opengl vs direct-x. I guess it'd be nice to see some Steam/Proton action too, since I'm already asking for the moon. ... And, dang I'm sorry, can you do a follow up when the Intel Celestial GPUs get a stable linux driver? ;)

  • @Kneedragon1962
    @Kneedragon1962 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Well done ~ thank you.

  • @DRIVING_ME_CRAZY
    @DRIVING_ME_CRAZY 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Would you be able to tell a speed difference without benchmarks? Probably not, but still interesting.

  • @Automata_Omega
    @Automata_Omega ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I'd suggest Linux Mint over everything, because of its usability and accesibility and thanks to it's base (debian through ubuntu) it's rock solid.

  • @kalilsiqueira8980
    @kalilsiqueira8980 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice one, bro.

  • @twocatsgaming6628
    @twocatsgaming6628 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Kudos for this! This is one of the few fair "Linux vs Windows" comparisons I've seen on YT. So many of them are so blatantly biased one way or the other, and it's so disingenuous and unhelpful.
    So, again... Kudos for keeping it as fair as possible.

    • @TechHut
      @TechHut  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I use both systems so I was curious going into this haha

  • @ARVash
    @ARVash 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Flatpak removes most of the differences, basically like running it from a container. I'd be curious to see what it would run like without that.

  • @fatbeard8072
    @fatbeard8072 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    That was informative and kool to watch. I love my LM for the ease of use and me being a novice at Linux. Makes it feel like Win 7 up to a point. When ever I build my newer(ish) computer, I will want to use Manjaro for Arch based due to it being more GUI for me and I can learn more on that. I am not a VMer at all, don't have enough hardware to really try other Distro's and or different based systems at once. One day though. Keep up the great videos.

    • @gamerking64
      @gamerking64 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Kool! (Kde guy here;)

  • @morelukeplayz6953
    @morelukeplayz6953 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good comparison, but I think you should put the numbers 1 2 3 4 to the corresponding OS to make it easier to see what OS is good in what aspect.

  • @FeedScrn
    @FeedScrn 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Kool video. I didn't know that MS made Edge for Linux.
    @2:40 - all four Kaden live screens were really fuzzy. Not good. In looking at it a second time, Windows 11 had the clearest screen-shot.

  • @mortadasalah6617
    @mortadasalah6617 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    i think these benchmarks will be different when you use intel processors

    • @M167A1
      @M167A1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You did the best thing you could there, you suggested a direction for future study.

  • @xellaz
    @xellaz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Manjaro KDE Plasma user here! It's awesome! 😁

  • @geoffreyrenemoiens3089
    @geoffreyrenemoiens3089 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Congrats with being a dad :) Great video!

  • @vijaypanchalr3
    @vijaypanchalr3 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I really don't want to know benchmark but minimalism and usability of linux, i love linux specifically debian with xfce or gnome, i also used fedora 34 and loved it

  • @someonesomewhere9321
    @someonesomewhere9321 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Good stuff all around, except for testing Kdenlive Nightly on Windows, and choosing Edge (which just barely came out of beta on Linux) for the browser perfomance comparison; both of these favor W11, especially in regards to Edge running on Windows.
    Also, no ram usage comparisons?

    • @TechHut
      @TechHut  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Ram tests will be in the full article I'm still writing.
      Here are the scores:
      Windows 11: 316
      Linux Mint: 320
      Fedora 35: 318
      Manjaro: 319

  • @Infinit3Enigma
    @Infinit3Enigma 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I've done scientific/engineering simulation benchmarks in linux and I've seen fedora peak way higher than arch, so manjaro should be same. All ubuntu derivatives fell behind.

  • @raminybhatti5740
    @raminybhatti5740 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Glad I bit the bullet and went down the Mint & Win10 dual boot route a few weeks ago. I'd been on Win8.1 since 2015 but I was increasingly encountering software that had warnings about Win8.1 incompatibility. I'd installed Elementary OS on an old laptop about 5 years ago just to get acclimatised to Linux before letting it anywhere near my desktop, so the learning curve for Mint wasn't too steep. Win 10 stripped of all telemetry, bloatware, and similar nonsense is actually quite beautiful, but to maintain it in that pristine state is too much for me. I want to get things done, not tinker with the OS constantly.

    • @mgnfy-view
      @mgnfy-view 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Is it safe to have a laptop with dual boot windows 11 and linuxmint? Will it mess with my windows? Like corrupt it or something ?

    • @the_sweetpotato9254
      @the_sweetpotato9254 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@cross_talker Yes, it's completely safe. Just be sure you write to right partitions/drives etc. I'm more worried about linux side, lol. I have read that windows tends to overwrite grub bootloader with its own thus making you unable to boot into mint. Haven't tried dualbooting myself but it should be pretty easy to reinstall grub from any linux usb.

    • @xfy123
      @xfy123 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@the_sweetpotato9254just use a different grub partition and mount windows in Linux so that grub can detect it.

  • @heckyes
    @heckyes 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    When Mint gets Wayland it's basically GG for all the distro hoppers out there.

  • @ChaosDom69
    @ChaosDom69 ปีที่แล้ว

    You rock
    Switching from windows 11 to mint mostly play steam and browse the web so far lovin it😊

  • @moetocafe
    @moetocafe 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Very nice test. The only thing I miss are tests with Chromium and Firefox. That would have been much closer to real life average user on those OSes.

  • @ENTERTAINMENT-lf2wy
    @ENTERTAINMENT-lf2wy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I've been rocking Fedora 35 on Wayland with the Nvidia 495 driver and it's great and buttery smooth! Just make you get the dash to panel extension to make it similar to Windows. People are sleeping on this big time. Actually no, it's literally somewhat of a new thing lmao.

    • @outofahat9363
      @outofahat9363 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      any weird problems with wayland on nvidia? do you think its ready?

    • @idtyu
      @idtyu 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@outofahat9363 as if right now, the implementation on fedora is the only official and native implementation of nvidia on wayland, definitely won't be 100% stable, but from what I heard, it's pretty good already

  • @wraithstrikevids
    @wraithstrikevids 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A lot of these were really hardware benchmarks, like grinding on the CPU to encode a video, the OS doesn't affect that much. I'd like to see some benchmarks that cover the human usability stuff, like in Windows if you open your downloads folder with like ~100 files in it, it takes multiple seconds for the directory contents to appear, making the OS feel very slow in day to day use. Also the amount of time it takes for the right click menu to appear. The Windows start menu is also horribly slow, often showing blank UI for a few frames before text labels appear. Launch times for various programs would be more useful than boot time (since I rarely reboot), especially when you have a few programs running already.

  • @germanoutdoors7096
    @germanoutdoors7096 ปีที่แล้ว

    How do you work on linux with Davinci Resolve? I still have issues with MP4 files and need to convert them. That sucks as hell. Any recommendations?

  • @mr.mirror1213
    @mr.mirror1213 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Are no vulkan tests available for graphics benchmarks for linux?

  • @iso_2013
    @iso_2013 ปีที่แล้ว

    The Geekbench for WIndows was done with the 'Balanced' power plan, I wonder how much better Windows would have been overall with the performance power plan

  • @KuruGDI
    @KuruGDI 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    An idea for a new video: Desktop environment vs. Window manager
    What is the difference. Commons projects. Can I swap as I please or does one require a specific other (eg. GNOME requires Mutter).

    • @Ironpants57
      @Ironpants57 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The only things that could really be tested with raw Window managers is the screen compositor and if it uses wayland.
      Picom, and the multi abundance of forks out there, is the most widely used X screen compositor.. Other than Compiz for Xfce and the dieing Compton. - Picom is an active fork of Compton
      Wayland I guess would be pretty broad. It will depend on how they utilize Wayland in their window manager.

    • @Ironpants57
      @Ironpants57 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Switching the Desktop Environment's window manager is kinda hacky and might end up with weird results.. Few examples:
      - Gnome would either need a legacy build or you would need to do some hacking. Try looking at the i3-gnome project and/or sway-gnome project.
      - Plasma's disconnect is really apparent when you see the WM launch and fully working.. But you got to wait for Plasma's bootup screen to end before you can use the desktop.
      - Xfce will have limited customizing support. It would have to be customized through the WM you choose.
      Basically you'll have to bypass the DE's WM in certain ways to switch the WM. Customizing window borders and title bars will depend on the WM you choose. End results may vary.
      What you are really getting out of this is the DE's compositor and it's status bar.

    • @AbteilungsleiterinBeiAntifaEV
      @AbteilungsleiterinBeiAntifaEV 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Ironpants57 you can disable plasma's launch screen.

    • @keit99
      @keit99 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AbteilungsleiterinBeiAntifaEV b-but the launch screen is important

  • @Don_XII
    @Don_XII 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @4:20 , AMD drivers on windows doesn't have proper support to OpenGL anymore, that's why. score would be the same as others if that wasn't the case.
    Edit: oh, you can see that in all of the tests after that are using openGL.

  • @TheBlueRajaAttacks
    @TheBlueRajaAttacks 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Could we get the Linux kernel versions next time? Newer versions have had some optimizations for AMD CPUs.

  • @attomicchicken
    @attomicchicken 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey. Can you try disabling core isolation in windows defender and see what results you get?

  • @_nishantk_
    @_nishantk_ 2 ปีที่แล้ว +90

    This shows that Linux mint is an extremely great choice

    • @aoitsukishiro9926
      @aoitsukishiro9926 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      I want to build new PC in the future using Linux Mint. Everything I read about them looks great and accessible for beginner

    • @opexpy05
      @opexpy05 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      besides, it is easy to use for window users, I quickly got used to it, but left the windows as a second OS

    • @dstinnettmusic
      @dstinnettmusic 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I mean, it’s solid, but I’d say that the big takeaway is that Linux is solid all around. Mint lead in some things, fedora in some thing and Manjaro in some things.
      Given the nature of desktop Linux, I don’t think enough is changed “under the hood” that distro really matters.
      I use fedora on my home media server and Manjaro on my audio station/coding/gaming rig.
      Only thing I have against Mint is that it is Ubuntu based. And even then, there are worse things than Ubuntu.

    • @Joe-3
      @Joe-3 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@dstinnettmusic you might want to check out LMDE (Linux Mint Debian Edition)

    • @mr.mastermind4840
      @mr.mastermind4840 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Linux Mint is great and really addictive. I just don't like to game on it. The graphics don't look as good as compared to other distro's or maybe Windows but in General the Graphics appear slightly darker and it looks and feels different not in a bad way and it will certainly not hamper your gaming experience but still. I use a GT 1030 ddr5. If anyone knows how can we fix it then it would be awesome

  • @master8920
    @master8920 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks bro🤝

  • @kulievelnur
    @kulievelnur 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I noticed such a thing. I have Internet 100 mb. on Fedor, the speed test shows 55 and on Manjaro 75. and Fedor in live mode shows 75, but after installing on disk 55. can you do the test

  • @jejo2057
    @jejo2057 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Speed test on arch void and windows please bro

  • @Smittron
    @Smittron 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I tried Fedora 34 after it came out and really liked it; however, I couldn't get my system to wake up from sleep. Are others having this problem?

  • @mirkoregina8733
    @mirkoregina8733 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi, I have an old dual-core pc higher than 2ghz and 2 giga ram and a minimum gpu I'm interested in the best programs for photo and video editing which distro do you recommend for more versatility? Thank you.

  • @t.crow9531
    @t.crow9531 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Will there be a battery life test? Kind of interested to know how it fare in modern laptop

  • @M4rkux
    @M4rkux 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey, if you accept suggestions, I know a distro called Arch Linux GUI, and I saw in some benchmarks that it was beating the other distros, even the Arch Linux itself.

  • @Ramnokri
    @Ramnokri ปีที่แล้ว

    4:11 is it a bug or is the windows unigine engine running only on 8 threads while it was running on the linux versions with 16 as shown?

  • @Watchandlearn91
    @Watchandlearn91 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Were these tests ran before or after the patches for AMD CPUs on Windows? Seemed like cpu stuff lagged behind and anything with opengl lagged behind in Windows because of AMD's OpenGL implementation on Windows.

    • @TechHut
      @TechHut  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      After. I wanted do this video when Windows 11 first dropped, but I had to wait for everything to get fixed.

    • @Watchandlearn91
      @Watchandlearn91 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TechHut Very good to know and makes this info much more accurate. Windows has always been slower than Linux in cpu related tasks but wow.

  • @Gamer-ct6hb
    @Gamer-ct6hb 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Please do this with windows 11 insider beta they have done insane performance improvements! up to 2x faster startup 4x faster shutdown 2x faster opening apps. This new windows update is insane!
    Edit: And remove most telemetry! Would like to see the difference then! For now im keeping notifications on and not switching to a linux distro
    Edit V2: I switched to linux anyway 5 months later.

  • @blendingsentinel4797
    @blendingsentinel4797 ปีที่แล้ว

    Remember that GIMP is based on the GTK framework and is not easily compatible to Windows and has to go through a built-in compatibility layer of some kind.

  • @trevorspiro945
    @trevorspiro945 ปีที่แล้ว

    As your channel came on (I’ve never seen it before) I thought your voice was that of the famous actor Donald Sutherland!

  • @TapUnderTap
    @TapUnderTap 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    im looking forward to starting using linux as a daily. which one one do you recommend to start with. machine is a xps 9560 4k oled with 1050 and 7700hq

  • @christianuhl7929
    @christianuhl7929 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    you had a fresh windows 11 install right? at the default there is a feature called VBS security enabled which really make the windows 11 graphical performance worse.

  • @simonbullado
    @simonbullado 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks !!!

  • @rcheatz9497
    @rcheatz9497 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you make a tutorial at how to install Davinci resolve and amd opencl on manjaro. I've been try using some package in AUR, and still can't using Davinci resolve

  • @TechnoMinded-qp5in
    @TechnoMinded-qp5in 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Try the Garuda distro it's becoming just as Legendary as Windows takes a few moments to install controller drivers but works a hell of a lot better than SteamOS it also offers emulator downloads through VIA Add Software module and comes equipped with Citra if you want a modern Linux it's definitely worth looking into if you still exist I hope you take my suggestion.

  • @PoulLarsenmusic
    @PoulLarsenmusic 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Did you set the distros to high performance?

  • @DarkGT
    @DarkGT 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I think Vulkan graphical test are needed. It's cross platform and very up to date.

  • @BUDA20
    @BUDA20 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    if virtualization is ON on the BIOS a fresh install of windows 11 will activate Core Insolation, that virtualizes the kernel for security, that has a porcentual performance lost, be sure to deactivate it if that's the case (since virtualization is not active in most systems by default)

    • @motoryzen
      @motoryzen 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      LOL. ( facepalm)
      It doesn't matter if it's virtualized or not....Windows has PROVEN for 3 decades straight to NOT be a secure Operating system.
      changing the icy of the cake still means..it's a cake
      Now I agree with your point that this virtualization being on in bios CAN hinder performance in gaming and a few things by a small but noticeable enough margin. That's also been proven since winturd 11's launching.

    • @WololoWololo2
      @WololoWololo2 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@motoryzen What is *WINTURD 11?*

  • @V1CT1MIZED
    @V1CT1MIZED 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    AMD OpenGL performance on windows is bad. That’s why when using directX it was way ahead of Linux. Hopefully AMD address it sometime this century. Vulkan vs DirectX would be good to see

  • @nour-eldinrachidi2282
    @nour-eldinrachidi2282 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    good job
    thanx

  • @peppe540
    @peppe540 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Good fun! Thanks Brandon. Tbh: I was positively surprised by the good result of Linux Mint, which is supposed to be that noob etc.? ;-) Well, at least it seems Cinnamon is a very optimized DE.

    • @motoryzen
      @motoryzen 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yes..Linux Mint has most often be THE most gentle transition from Windows to the Linux world for the past 10 years straight, but that doesn't mean it will be the slowest..NOR fastest out of all distro options either :) *shrugs*
      But it's tried and true. Clem and the LM dev team has proven that and THAT is what makes it such a worthy choice.

  • @LondenTower
    @LondenTower ปีที่แล้ว +1

    And this is why i love Linux in general, especially PeppermintOS.
    Using Windows 10 on a laptop with a 3rd gen Intel CPU and HDD is absolutely S L O W, but with PeppermintOS it's actually quite tolerable.
    But i betcha using Both Windows 10 or Peppermint with an SSD will drastically improve both boot times. (Not sure who would win here)
    But I'm sure PeppermintOS would knock it out of the park when using an SSD. (And if you still occasionally need Windows, you can always make a Dual-boot setup. Install Windows first, then Linux)

  • @azula9714
    @azula9714 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you!!! where is Linux challenge of Linus part 2 reaction

  • @harrymason1053
    @harrymason1053 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What about doing Windows 10 vs. Windows 11? Be interesting to see if it's worth it.

  • @kellingc
    @kellingc ปีที่แล้ว

    with the graphics, was Fedora running on Wayland or X?

  • @RobLeonard
    @RobLeonard ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If Linux had 100% compatibility with all games, I would switch to it over windows in a heart beat. I just love the customization, and the privacy.

  • @PetrTesarTomcat
    @PetrTesarTomcat ปีที่แล้ว

    Good job

  • @michaelsmi8900
    @michaelsmi8900 ปีที่แล้ว

    What about adobe programs? Do you check normal software for works?