@HanselManCan i think this is what he wants. He's performing a type of "apostolic" exegesis, a pastoral lecture to the masses hoping that some will be interesting enough go attempt to read his MASSIVE corpus of philosophy. He is, like Socrates and Neitzsche, an intellectual that wants to bear the mantle of a pseudo-intellectual. This is quite fitting for a Hegelian, since Hegel is right on the cusp of pure esoteric nonsense like Crowley or some other Enlightenment Order like the Freemasons.
@@MM-bx1ei chompsky, for one. But I think he's Associated with the Diem25 movements so he's got his connections still. Shame he doesn't visit the US much anymore.
...or our consciousness (understanding etc.) is incomplete within or without the nature being incomplete and we cant distinguish whether the nature is complete or not.
Hmmm i doubt this. I think the idea of any approximation deals in sophistry, and thus all of inductive science is foundationally flawed, all normative science contingent (say, logic) on mere convention, all deductive rationalism brittle and weak against the "black swan".
why does everyone hate this guy hes totally right
My guess? Because he's right.
Who hates him?
@HanselManCan i think this is what he wants. He's performing a type of "apostolic" exegesis, a pastoral lecture to the masses hoping that some will be interesting enough go attempt to read his MASSIVE corpus of philosophy.
He is, like Socrates and Neitzsche, an intellectual that wants to bear the mantle of a pseudo-intellectual. This is quite fitting for a Hegelian, since Hegel is right on the cusp of pure esoteric nonsense like Crowley or some other Enlightenment Order like the Freemasons.
@@MM-bx1ei chompsky, for one. But I think he's Associated with the Diem25 movements so he's got his connections still. Shame he doesn't visit the US much anymore.
@@R1ckr011 Chomsky is trash
I love how dangerously close Zizek get to Kabbalah.
He mentioned the theology of rabbi Yitzhak Luria in another talk, he seems to really like the notion of broken vessel.
Ecclesiastes 7:13 - “Consider the work of God: Who can make straight what is crooked?”
Faded out at the best part!
...or our consciousness (understanding etc.) is incomplete within or without the nature being incomplete and we cant distinguish whether the nature is complete or not.
Hmmm i doubt this. I think the idea of any approximation deals in sophistry, and thus all of inductive science is foundationally flawed, all normative science contingent (say, logic) on mere convention, all deductive rationalism brittle and weak against the "black swan".
Thats what Kant did and he was wrong.
@@JavierBT90 Would you bother to enlighten us a little more specifically pls?
I've had the same thought that he describes.
why would you end the clip!!