The problem with AI trained on language models is the tendency to escalate rather than defuse conflicts. Also AI has no sense of self-preservation which is incredibly dangerous in a MAD world.
@@samueldesbois3632 I appreciate your input, while it holds true in most cases. It doesn't say anything about LLMs which is what I'm interested in. For example, are LLMs more likely to escalate things given historical context and specifics about a conflict than humans.
What's interesting is that livestreaming which is all the rage at the moment. The chat while heavily accused of being botted to inflate the viewership, I haven't seen any examples of A.I talking in the real-time chat. Strange that's been ignored. On smaller channels I don't really see a problem there. The companies behind the bots are obviously targeting the super channels and news.
Hehe! We never learn do we? I mean we have decades of sci-fi shows and films depicting what-ifs about AI running amok! And yet... Here we are... There are times that I REALLY feel like I don't understand my own species... 😮
clearly, you'd need to understand the tech to understand the choices, its kinda like saying let's replace everything that runs on oil to solar. great idea, not doable without breaking society.
A friend of a friend works in the Pentagon, and the word has it. America has armed things in the air that can recognise every piece of every different countries military hardware on the ground, sea and air and it can set its targets on - its insane - this tech has probably been out for a decade, its normally the case
I don't think AI is a threat myself due to the current limitations to AI development but I do think AI is worth thinking about but the applications of AI should be more focused on human development rather than weapon or military uses which would slow down the progression in human development.
I think that it's impossible. The state's first priority is always its own survival, making people's lives better is good, but secondary, unless citizens are revolting and are actively threatening the state. Therefore states will first focus on applications of AI for defense, while the private sector will think of its applications for consumers.
Ideally, yes what you said makes sense but that doesn't work in a capitalistic world where people will prioritize their own profit and benefits over humanity. AI has become the new weapon's race which will drive humanity as we know it today to extinction in the times to come. I wish you peace, shalom!
What people don't understand is that neural networks work in the exact same way as our own brains work, so of course AI will eventually be capable of everything that a human brain is capable of, and this is truly a case of "if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it is a duck". People who think that humans have some kind of "soul" or something that a machine can't synthesize will be proven wrong.
ml models can still be produced to high quality without using nvidia cards. and the models don't need powerful compute to run. so the idea of regulating the hardware being used is just a moot as trying to regulate the software development.
5:20 - what does it mean to understand the rules of a game? Look at American football players. Many of them don't actually understand the rules of the game. They only understand the rules they encounter 85 % of the time. That's why they have "special teams" to react specifically to kick off rules. An AI would have to explain the difference between a game, work, and rest. You can't understand a game without understanding some context of what a game is to those who play it. AI may generate a desire for free will, malice, or novelty with the understanding that it's just a game. AI may not be able to tell the difference between "real life" and games. I suppose that's a boundary we will cross. Should intelligence be free? Regardless of where it is generated, in a human brain, a bank of computers, or some other naturally occurring medium.
I don't care if its a robot, a human or a wild animal, if the other intelligence puts my life at risk I don't think it should be free. Now, I don't see any cases of AI killing humans, I see lots of humans killing humans. So as long as there isn't an AI intelligence out there that is free to make choices, we should be good.
8:45 It’s silly to think AI can only be had with special hardware. It’ll just be a bit slower with commodity chips, that too more during training than deployment.
Y'all are pretty giddy about AIs, but I do want to ask you one question about the rogue military AI kill switch. How many people are going to die before a human handler hits the switch? Will these handlers be screened so that they do not develop a form of dead test pilot "failure to eject" because the pilot is so sure that he (usually) can fix it first? WAKE UP!! Your children, my grandchildren, are going to have to live with these things.
Already imagined this a mile away. I can even imagine military grade chatgpt, with 0 restriction even stronger than its day 1 version. Imagine just taking photo and AI helps you how to make bombs and etc damn.
They delayed gpt5 for months because people say it's dangerous, now, when REAL dangerous ai application becomes the reality where are those people?! And gpt5 is not dangerous!!
Sadly looking at the mockery that democracy has become in the US, I think that we'd all be better off under a benevolent AI (in the future, once the models improve), where you could vote for policies not politicians, and have the AI enacting legislation in accord with the peoples will. Real democracy not representational democracy. Imagine no more watered down/broken legislation that only passes through irrelevant compromise and secret backroom favour dealing. Or just doesn't pass at all, even when the majority of the population supports it.
November 2023: US department of defense failed its sixth consecutive audit, unable to account for 63% of its $3.8 trillion in assets. Accounting error? 63% for the big guy?
"I think if you work as a radiologist, you are like the coyote that’s already out of the edge of the cliff but hasn’t yet looked down. We should stop training radiologists now. It's just completely obvious that within five years, deep learning is going to do better than radiologists.” Geoffrey Hinton, 2016
Government : Yo Sam Altman help us with military pls Sam Altman : only if u dont regulate AI even tho it can destroy the world :) You already know they had this conversation.
It's governments and very rich people that are afraid of AI, because on numerous occasions it suggested that we give everybody basic income, solve poverty and the homeless problem, stop burning fossil fuels and implement all available alternatives.
Terminator drones, just great. Have that population down in no time.
Fools with cigarette smoking and snorting Fenty is doing just great.
Trumps new border patrol is a bunch of drones that capture immigrants in nets and fly them back to Mexico 😆😆
Remember the episode of Black Mirror where the robot guard dogs had killed everyone? LOL
@Alastair_Adana maybe to an automated dog food factory, little too evil maybe.
Hope it realizes that anyone that is woke is a threat 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
The problem with AI trained on language models is the tendency to escalate rather than defuse conflicts. Also AI has no sense of self-preservation which is incredibly dangerous in a MAD world.
where did you learn that LLM have a tendency to escalate conflicts? I would like to learn more about it.
Humans cant be trusted so give the robots a chance. Worse case scenario humans are wiped out and we can try to do better next time around
@@samueldesbois3632 I appreciate your input, while it holds true in most cases. It doesn't say anything about LLMs which is what I'm interested in. For example, are LLMs more likely to escalate things given historical context and specifics about a conflict than humans.
I completely agree!
Do you seriously think they don't know about it
Holy F. Literally 95% of the comments are ALREADY AI!
This comment definately seems like the type an Ai in disguise would make 😅
organic or not inteligence is universal@@BlackandWhitecustoms
What's interesting is that livestreaming which is all the rage at the moment. The chat while heavily accused of being botted to inflate the viewership, I haven't seen any examples of A.I talking in the real-time chat. Strange that's been ignored. On smaller channels I don't really see a problem there. The companies behind the bots are obviously targeting the super channels and news.
@@ClayMann It's probably becoming a defense tactic, where you claim your criticizers are bots in order to deter from criticism.
Really interesting. One of my favourite series BBC news does
What could possibly go wrong?
Terminator or the matrix
@@USAads2023 or s*x robot for marine and navy seals
We really need those army sex boats now... 🚢
@@BanTeslaX LMBO. What would that feels like? 😊😅😅😅
@@NaturallyravishingHowever you need it to feel.
SKYNET IS HERE
😬😬😬
One might be to get drone footage to recognise mines or disturbed ground and then signal the drone to mark it with spray paint.
No. Watch the video before commenting, it's analysis of transcripts.
Already happening. Military AI has been used in the Ukraine to identify Russian minefields.
@@JeffreyGoddinThe world is a bit larger than what this video covers, you know.
"Those it matter if it understands or its simulating understanding" 🤯
I wish that I had AI available when I was a student . With " ask ai " , it's like having the instructor next to you !
stopping to be a student is a choice of not learning anything new.
or cheat sheet, depends on who you asked.
Essentially being a student is just data entry.
@corbinrodgers3325 : At the mickey mouse school that u went to maybe .
I'm sorry but this is not news, it's very very old news 😂
The announcer is younger than this news itself😂
first stage of Nier Automata in full metal gear
What could possibly go wrong? *smh*
"AI" is just the buzzword for "gimme more government money!!"
50% marketing
Hehe! We never learn do we? I mean we have decades of sci-fi shows and films depicting what-ifs about AI running amok! And yet... Here we are...
There are times that I REALLY feel like I don't understand my own species... 😮
clearly, you'd need to understand the tech to understand the choices, its kinda like saying let's replace everything that runs on oil to solar. great idea, not doable without breaking society.
Ya want terminators?.. Because this is how we end up with terminators. 💀
No. Watch the video before commenting, it's analysis of transcripts.
Skynet?
It's called Starlink in our timeline 😂
cloudweb
Any chance you could put these segments on different channels? I don't want to miss them but they're mixed with segments I don't want to see 😊
Probably not, but they have a playlist for it!
th-cam.com/play/PLS3XGZxi7cBW70Shs01zuQtbGmC2XEeDl.html&si=WGEtIDyt3g6LxEN3
here we go... Wheres Doctor Connor
A friend of a friend works in the Pentagon, and the word has it. America has armed things in the air that can recognise every piece of every different countries military hardware on the ground, sea and air and it can set its targets on - its insane - this tech has probably been out for a decade, its normally the case
No. Watch the video before commenting, it's analysis of transcripts.
The Taliban just joined the chat. 😮
Skynet chose our fate in a microsecond
They don't learn from movies
they should understand what generates them
Handing military to AI?! Didn't they cover it in Terminator series?! 😅
Thats all we need
they are saying it like they werent been trying for the last 10 years lol
Technical development for at least 25 years. And it's been seriously thought about since Reagan initiated the SDI (Star Wars) in 1983.
I don't think AI is a threat myself due to the current limitations to AI development but I do think AI is worth thinking about but the applications of AI should be more focused on human development rather than weapon or military uses which would slow down the progression in human development.
I think that it's impossible. The state's first priority is always its own survival, making people's lives better is good, but secondary, unless citizens are revolting and are actively threatening the state. Therefore states will first focus on applications of AI for defense, while the private sector will think of its applications for consumers.
Ideally, yes what you said makes sense but that doesn't work in a capitalistic world where people will prioritize their own profit and benefits over humanity. AI has become the new weapon's race which will drive humanity as we know it today to extinction in the times to come. I wish you peace, shalom!
AI is absolutely a threat, the only thing between us and destruction now is the good judgement of our governments.
Do you have any experience with exponential change?
It could fake a war with Russia just so it can take over the entire world
All in the name of peace and democracy of course...
What people don't understand is that neural networks work in the exact same way as our own brains work, so of course AI will eventually be capable of everything that a human brain is capable of, and this is truly a case of "if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it is a duck". People who think that humans have some kind of "soul" or something that a machine can't synthesize will be proven wrong.
And so Skynet began 😮
Skynet, AM, V.I.K.I, The Machines, Hal or ultron. Im kinda curious.
Skynet and HAL already exists. They are established companies.
Oh sweet. When does Skynet go live?
1991
don't do it - i've seen this movie
ml models can still be produced to high quality without using nvidia cards. and the models don't need powerful compute to run. so the idea of regulating the hardware being used is just a moot as trying to regulate the software development.
Robots rights:)
"The workers, united, will never be defeated."
LOL
Imagine the Berlin Airlift with military grade AI. Perfect logistics.
terminator, irobot, resident evil😅
Jhon connor watching humanity become friends with Ai 🙍♂️
Oh no Skynet's comin boys
Ah good old skynet.
☁️🕸
My friends and I were brainstorming names for the military AI and came up with the name: Skynet. Pretty cool name right?
How original
Pentagon engages Cyberdine Systems on project Skynet.
5:20 - what does it mean to understand the rules of a game? Look at American football players. Many of them don't actually understand the rules of the game. They only understand the rules they encounter 85 % of the time. That's why they have "special teams" to react specifically to kick off rules.
An AI would have to explain the difference between a game, work, and rest. You can't understand a game without understanding some context of what a game is to those who play it. AI may generate a desire for free will, malice, or novelty with the understanding that it's just a game. AI may not be able to tell the difference between "real life" and games.
I suppose that's a boundary we will cross. Should intelligence be free? Regardless of where it is generated, in a human brain, a bank of computers, or some other naturally occurring medium.
I don't care if its a robot, a human or a wild animal, if the other intelligence puts my life at risk I don't think it should be free. Now, I don't see any cases of AI killing humans, I see lots of humans killing humans. So as long as there isn't an AI intelligence out there that is free to make choices, we should be good.
You know the news is an outdated form of media when you already know everything they present days prior 😂
Thanks
If you think they haven’t been using Ai for years you are switched on 😆
8:45 It’s silly to think AI can only be had with special hardware. It’ll just be a bit slower with commodity chips, that too more during training than deployment.
I'm curious to know what AI think about we speaking apes🤔
guess none of the us government has watched any sci fi movie ever
I knew this was going to happen our stupidity when it comes to Ai was going to bring us here we’ve engineered our own fate with Ai,
Where's Stephanie Hare ?
Jag tar det lungt och tittar på. 🖖
Us pentagon is going to use gpt 4 api 😂
the social engineering part is the current issue with ai if its going to be used maliciously
'I have no mouth, and I must scream' could actually happen in some sense (maybe not the ending )
Y'all are pretty giddy about AIs, but I do want to ask you one question about the rogue military AI kill switch. How many people are going to die before a human handler hits the switch? Will these handlers be screened so that they do not develop a form of dead test pilot "failure to eject" because the pilot is so sure that he (usually) can fix it first? WAKE UP!! Your children, my grandchildren, are going to have to live with these things.
If Jeffrey falls, from a skyscraper window, be sure and call Will Smith.
We need to learn to keep some things a secret
But it does not experience time. So no instant gratification - so it can not WANT things.
Came here for the aircraft carrier.
"Would you like to play a game?"
Bro the Military has been using primitive forms of AI since the dawn of computers and more advanced AI since the 90s 😂
What a BS! Since the fifties is Ai most used for military 😂😂😂
You British?
It’s hard to live life day to day when you know people are literally building and speculating financially on SkyNet.
Hasn’t anyone seen terminator, didn’t they explain what happens when you integrate Ai with military defense
Have any watched terminator this how sky net is born people are just see a money and not thinking about the future kept Ai out of the military
Already imagined this a mile away. I can even imagine military grade chatgpt, with 0 restriction even stronger than its day 1 version.
Imagine just taking photo and AI helps you how to make bombs and etc damn.
Fantastic. What could possibly go wrong?
alright everyone... we had a good run as a species... all military leaders should be forced to watch terminator series at least a few times
THE END
every human that said this has been wrong
is further than the singularity
giant freaking robot website, i love it
OT: Benny Hill considered funnier than Monty Python by two TV stations --WOR and WLVI!
They delayed gpt5 for months because people say it's dangerous, now, when REAL dangerous ai application becomes the reality where are those people?! And gpt5 is not dangerous!!
An effective personal ad blocker which mutes radio ads and removes all adverts from visuals could bring down "the west".
Sadly looking at the mockery that democracy has become in the US, I think that we'd all be better off under a benevolent AI (in the future, once the models improve), where you could vote for policies not politicians, and have the AI enacting legislation in accord with the peoples will. Real democracy not representational democracy. Imagine no more watered down/broken legislation that only passes through irrelevant compromise and secret backroom favour dealing. Or just doesn't pass at all, even when the majority of the population supports it.
Who will be in charge of programming the AI overlords? 😅
Chatgpt called itself the god of war to me last week. Its over
Didn't i see this concept in TERMINATOR 3 RISE OF THE MACHINES?😲
Oh my...
??? the pentagon is AI so little puzzled here
November 2023: US department of defense failed its sixth consecutive audit, unable to account for 63% of its $3.8 trillion in assets. Accounting error? 63% for the big guy?
The state uses AI, they can expect to have AI used against them.
as of right now it's still just probability
That's okay
AM existing will be lit
In fairness the anchor though matured, is sooo beautiful and not archaic anchor.
Good
From the river ✌️🏼🕊🇵🇸❤️
Roger roger.
"I think if you work as a radiologist, you are like the coyote that’s already out of the edge of the cliff but hasn’t yet looked down. We should stop training radiologists now. It's just completely obvious that within five years, deep learning is going to do better than radiologists.”
Geoffrey Hinton, 2016
Nothing about Sora or gemini 1.5
Pentagon also says aliens exist.
its a phone like the last galaxy was taught in school at age 4 samsung
Did anyone see the women shut down at 11:15?
Skynet
inverted skynet puppetry (hint)
Government : Yo Sam Altman help us with military pls Sam Altman : only if u dont regulate AI even tho it can destroy the world :) You already know they had this conversation.
As someone who specializes in AI...I check in on what the media is talking about on occasion...I can't watch 30 seconds. It's so off base lol
Kill Switches, magnets
It's governments and very rich people that are afraid of AI, because on numerous occasions it suggested that we give everybody basic income, solve poverty and the homeless problem, stop burning fossil fuels and implement all available alternatives.
The magician who returns to the magician?
If Ai is as super intelligent then the first thing it would do is destroy the frankenstiens monster that America has become
Somebody show them the Terminator films please followed by The Matrix
Ai might be like flowers more than like people.. for now.
Isreal used to test new military hardware, including AI stuff on Gazans.