Narrator here! Glad you like my work! Doing these scripts is always a joy, and I try to make sure I'm improving with each script. Thanks so much for your support.
It was told that upon the escape of Moses and his tribe from Egypt, they were able to confront the Hittites and the Amorites in the desert. And they were able to win the battle against them.
Zagrosian/taurusian tribes used to live in this region, in today's closest race is either Armenian or Kurdish in origin, the history belongs to thousands of years before arrival of Turkish or Arabic tribes to the area
hittites was hebrew israelites canaanites born in achamenides empires from samaryakingdom and lions of judah hittites was mixtures of mittani ,they not dissapear they go in siberya russia stepe volga bolgars central asia e,inner mongolia in xiongu tribes and scityians huns cumans names hittites ,is fathers of scitians they spook sanskrit aramaics iranians cuneyforms written by pryest and only spooken by all middle ,east, to not forget in israel only pryest is written manuscript torah or bible,, they was proto mongols iranians , or turkhis iranians ancestor of turkhis and iranians partyans parsy farsy and medes ,they , childrens formed turuk turanians in gogturk empires in tarim basin , scityians and huns and iranians empires in kushan empires ,in persepolis iran city of cyrus the great , greeks was push back from iran persepolis by scityians saka in iran and tarim basin oxus river, ,and north india punjab and taxila kasmir
hittites is fathers of scityians and huns , our ,grand fatehers of roma gypsy populations scityians our fathers from hittites and mittany, and all russia steppe tarim basin and eastern europe all with, r1a, haplogroup is from scityians haplogroup ,becouse scityians empires was from eastern europe croatia russia central asia,, to inner mongolia by xiongu and uyghur turkhis iranics kazak to south east asia indonesya all area to japan saka drink and nagasaka city of memory of scityians ,and north america by scityians siberyans turkhis iranians ,scityians was large tribe family
Polat Kaya: This citation states that: “The Hattic "Hattus" now became Hittite "Hattusa", and the king took the name of Hattusili I, the "one from Hattusa". I must note that, if the Hittite name HATTUSILI means “one from HATTUSA”, it means so because this word is a pure TURKISH word! This we see from the suffix “LI” at the end of the name HATTUSILI. The Turkish suffix “LI” means “from; of”. The name HATTUSİLİ is like present Turkish sayings such as ANKARALI, SİVASLI, KAYSERİLİ, etc. All of these mean “one from Ankara, one from Sivas, and one from Kayseri respectively. Please note that this does not mean that these people were different tribes with different languages. Thus, this HATTI word of some 4000 years ago is unquestionable evidence that the Hattians were Turkish speaking Tur/Turk/Oguz peoples - contrary to all kinds of mythological terms given in the Bible or anywhere else! Additionally, the name HITTITE, voiced as “HITTAYT”, is a modern concoction that is fabricated from a Turkish expression intended to replace the old Turanian word HATTI (KHATTI). In other words, the term HITTITEis an Aryanized form of the name HATTI. Actually, when we decipher the name HITTAYT (HITTITE) by rearranging its letters as “HATTI-TY”, we find that the term HITTITE is really the altered, restructured and alienated form of the Turkish name “HATTİ’Dİ” (HATTI İDİ) meaning “it was Hatti”. This alone indicates that the modern name HITTITE was concocted from the name HATTI into HITTITE. In other words, the original was Turanian AKHATETE (which has been “interpreted” as KHATTI) but the “scholars” who supposedly read these ancient KHATTIAN texts simply changed the name into HITTITE and claimed it as “Indo-European”! Thus, the so-called name HITTITE is another Aryan term fabricated from Turkish. The meaning of this is that the Hatti empire continued on as a HATTI empire but modern scholars changed the name HATTI to HITTITE and labelled the whole thing as an “Indo-European Empire” to suit their purposes (i.e., painting the ancient Turanian world as an Aryan and Jewish world). Such modern labelling, some 4000 years after the event, changes the history of ancient Anatolia artificially into an “Aryan” or “Indo-European” dominated land rather than a land that was populated by the native Turanian Tur/Turk/Oguz peoples. Since what they did has not been questioned all this time, what they throw in - stayed in - thus giving the impression that what they say was true some 4000 years ago. Continuous propaganda of their concocted falsehood - conditions the unquestioning public into concluding that there was an “Indo-European” Empire in the heart of Turanian Anatolia. The truth is that there was no “Indo-European” languages until the wanderer Aryan priests artificially fabricated them from the much older Turkish language. One example of this is the wanderer Semite priests fabricating “Accadian and Assyrian” languages from the much older Turko-Sumerian language. Recently we have another example of such falsehood stating that “All Indo-European languages originated from Anatolia”. The intensive media propaganda presentation of this so-called “linguistic research of the Indo-European languages” by means of some computer manipulations is well implanted in the minds of the public - as if what was said was the truth. Actually, they would have been speaking the truth if they had labelled their paper as “All Indo-European languages originated from the ancient Turanian language of Turkish”. Finally, I point the reader to Isaiah 65:17 where the sovereign lord Jehova (YHWA) has said: ‘FOR HERE I AM CREATING NEW HEAVENS AND A NEW EARTH; AND THE FORMER THINGS WILL NOT BE CALLED TO MIND, NEITHER WILL THEY COME UP INTO THE HEART.’ Translated into simple terms, this means “I AM ERASING FROM HISTORY THE ANCIENT TURANIAN WORLD AND INSTALLING IN ITS PLACE A SEMITIC WORLD”. But the later Aryans also took the same concept and ran with it - with the so-called Christianity! Polat Kaya 2013-07-05
@TH-camCollege-es7tf You don't have a source. I have one. - Gene D. Matlock - What Strange Mystery Unites the Turkish Nations, India, Catholicism, and Mexico? It was painfully difficult for me to challenge, weaken and anesthetize my previous religious conditionings. After all, I was born Christian and still am. But I remained strong and resolute in my quest. I did not overlook any kind of anomaly, such as the strange similarities between Brahm-Abraham, Sarah-Saraisvati, and Hakra (Hagar?). I also found other Noahs and several Moseses in Hindu myths, but the Hindus say that many of the myths in their holy books occurred in Central Asia, especially in Siberia, ancestral home of all the Turkish peoples. Even the biblical Hindu Hittites and Amorites, the fathers and mothers of Jerusalem, also Abraham and Sarah, were Turks. If one cannot accept that the Hittites and Amorites were Turkish Krishtayas, he’ll never get any sense out of the Bible.
@TH-camCollege-es7tf - Gene D. Matlock - What Strange Mystery Unites the Turkish Nations, India, Catholicism, and Mexico? About God Kubera, India’s Regent of the North, King of the Yakshas or Yakhus, God of Wealth, Miners, Farmers, and Good Fortune. Most Hindu scholars are willing to admit that the Krishtayas a.k.a. Aryans were the fathers of Indian civilization. In his book, Ancient Geography of Ayodhya, Dr. Shyam Narain Pande states: Ancient Ayodhya, near Meru mountain, identified with the Pamir plateau is the ancient common home not only of Indians but of mankind…Indians and Iranians claim their common home towards the Asian Steppes, the ‘Ariyana-Vaego’ of the ancient Iranians, the country between Oxus and Xaxartes, north of Pamir plateau. The Western origin of the Chinese civilization proves that people from the steppes and lake regions of Asia, from time immemorial, have settled down in the Yellow River basin. The date is believed to be C. 2145 B.C. on the authority of Shu-chiang and Confucius. Those who followed agriculture in China must have been Rama. According to Dr. Dandekar, the earliest common habitat of the speakers of proto Indo-Europeans [languages] is the steppes between the Urals and Altai. In view of the fact that the proto Hellenes can be shown to have entered in Greece in C. 200 B.C., that the Hittites migrated in C. 2800 BC. towards the Caucasus mountains and the Caspian sea and the proto Aryans must be assumed to have separated from the main stock in C. 2500 B.C., the proto Indo-European unity must be, with reasonable certainty, dated from 3500 B.C. (pp. 45-46.) Several hundred years after the Great Flood, the Turkic country now called Bulgaria appears to have been the leader of all Central Asia. They were a horde called Kubera. Their leaders were Khagans (kings) of the Bulgarians and often called Kubrat, derived from the Sanskrit Kuber-Ratha, meaning, “Hero of the Kuberas.” Kubera appears to have been a large group; not a single individual. Kubera’s followers were called Yakshas or Yakhus. These had to be today’s partially mongoloid Siberian group called Yakhuts. They are associated also with similar peoples in the area called Buryats and Saka. When I was going through a list of Nomads of the Steppes, I was surprised to find many other tribes whose names are also common today in India Proper. In India, we have the Yadu (also known as Yayati, Yakhuda, Japeth, etc.), whose name derived from Yakhut, the Bharats (India’s true name) and the Sakas or Scythians.
@TH-camCollege-es7tf - Gene D. Matlock - What Strange Mystery Unites the Turkish Nations, India, Catholicism, and Mexico? I can continue with many more biblical statements that God gave only one son to the world from the beginning of time, and no other. This, in my opinion, confirms what Murad Adji said about Tengri, which is that other name of Jesus’ Celestial Father: God or Gospodi, for this name in Sanskrit is Dyupiter (Jupiter). Some readers may want to ask why the Turks insist on claiming Jesus as their own while the Jews do not. This answer is clear. Jesus himself was a Turk. The Turkish Karaite Jews themselves claim to be the original Jews. It has never been hidden from us that one of Jesus’ other names was David Koresh. The Aryans or Kurus (Kurush) were the ruling caste of the world from the very beginning. Even the Bible mentions the Nephilim or Nuphylum. The Bible tells us that when Abraham went to Jerusalem, the Hittites (Turks) were already in control of the city. But we don’t need the Bible to tell us that. This is a historical fact that can’t be denied. Christ also spoke Aramaic which is a Turkish dialect. In some way, the Turks found out that their new Divine King was to be born in Israel. The names of the Three Wise Men prove they were Turks.
I am a Shia Muslim from Lebanon according to my heritage test I belong to some Hittites who settled in Sidon ( coastal Lebanon ) I am very proud to be related to such a dominant people. I believe that during their height, they built Meso in Iraq ( the land between two rivers )
Thank you for this video. I do believe it reinforces the hypothesis that indo European languages originated in the Near East region. Ancient DNA studies have shown that the Hittites had no relationship to Steppe cultures, and as we all know you can't argue with DNA.
It is turkish people now. . It helenized before. Turk came, they mixed again. But we have %40 to their dna, %15 turkic, greek too. No pure Hittite people.
@@meralkeskin8511 yok %15 değil, en Mongoloid örnek olan karakhanid kaz Turk örneği bile bizi en az %20-30 Turkic gösteriyor, kaz Kıpçak örneği ile %40 medieval Turkic gene sahibiz
We can thank the Jews for their eradication 😂 though to be fair I think God ordered them to go in and clean house. Same with the jebusites and some others
thanks God, There is no Greek asserting heritage of Hittite. I believe that Turks are the most closely successor of these civilization in Anatolia regarding customs, habit, live manner.
Hittites did not come to India. They were likely assimilated by other invaders in Anatolian Plateau. People of Central Turkey of present time would perhaps have a good deal of genetics from the Hittites.
Northern Iraqis have Hittite ancestry. Its well known that Assyrians today descend from ancient Assyrians. Assyrians back then Had married Hittite women.
@@islammehmeov2334 I mean I descend from Celts but I'm not a Celt though. Descent doesn't mean membership. And yes Turks also descend from Hittites. Neither Turks nor Assyrians are Hittite. Just marrying people acquired the descent. Not ethnic membership
There was no "Hittite" empire. The name is taken from a Canaanite tribe mentioned in the Bible because it sounded a bit like Hatti. It was invented because the records discovered at Boghaskoi had a cuneiform version of the treaty with Ramses II of Egypt, and so an empire had to be created in the 13th century BCE to fit with the mistaken date of Ramses II reign which was actually in the 7th/6th century. The empire was in fact the Chaldean Empire and the treaty Ramses II signed was with Nebuchadnezzar. Most of the rest of the movie is a description of the Chaldeans, just time-shifted about 6 centuries.
If intersted...Rothman, quoted said...''All that was known in Mesopotamia came from Armenia and that Armenia is the absent fragment in the entire mosaic of the ancient world's civilization's construction. according to Anthropologist Mitchell S. Rothman regarding the extent of discoveries and specially on the quality of horse bones proved, According to him, that it was from the Shangavit Armenian 6000 years ago that the culture of that area spread around to the ancient world... Professor Jensen also says. ‘For almost everything that is known in the Hittite language is Old Armenian in form..Historian Sayce 1845-1933) also consider Hittite and Armenian to be one and the same’. what some historians say...H.V. Hilprecht(1859-1925) a Clark research professor of Assyriology and scientific director Babylonian expedition at the University of Penn. argue that the Hittite tongue is Armenian and the Hittites themselves were of Armenian stock...according to Ellis (1861) through language analysis we observe that under the names of Phrygians, Thracians,Pelasgians and Etruscans spread westward from Armenia to Italy and Elis claimed that the closest affinities of the Aryan element are the Armenians ..other historians that agree are..Hellenthal, Busgy, Brand, Wilson, Myers and Falush...let me quote Merrick (2012) All religions are descended from and ancient Vedic cosmology described in the Rib - Veda, originating in Armenia near Mt. Ararat at least 6800 ys ago and the basic concepts of a transcendental mountain extending into space and populated planet Star-gods were developed...he further says...This Astrotheology then migrated with Armenian Aryans to found the Sumerian Ethiopian/Egyptian and Indian civilizations and religions...from Language as a fingerprint Setyan...
@@hikeoganessian9729 Vedas Originated long before the birth of Armemia in Ancient India whose people called it Aryavart...and the Veda you have written about, that is not 'Rib Veda' it's 'Rig Veda'... If Vedas originated in Armenia then I believe it's people must be knowing that,There are 4 Vedas in Total: -Rig Veda. -Yajur Veda. -Atharva Veda. -Saam Veda. Do the people of Armenia even know what does Veda means without Googling(which I'm sure will be done).
Total BS. Hittite Empire is well documented. They found a whole library of clay tablets written in Hittite language detailing every aspects of their life in Hattusa in central Anatolia.
the Turks you come from Central Asia and the Kurds you come from the Iranian highlands while the Hittites are genetically ARMENIANS who live in the ARMENIAN highlands go and study history 🤣☀️☀️🇦🇲✌️✌️🔥🔥
Hittites were central anatolians and have nothing with armenia or armenians. Today their real children are the turks. Armenian genome is similar to hittites because armenians are from a close nation to hittites ( hurrians and urartians ) but not hittites.
check URARTU civiziliation as well. There is no correlation between Armenian and urartians who settle down south eastern Anatolia. they came from Caucasian so there is no point of your assessment regarding heritage. Sorry, you are out.
@@DG-if3gs the kingdom of Van was called urartu by the assyrians by other peoples was called Armina Arminia Armenia, in addition genetically the kingdom of van urartu it's the same genetics of the ARMENIANs even the names the Gods have Armenian names 💪🇦🇲🫡🤫🤫🤫
@@ARMENIA_HAYASTAN prove it? There is no correlation between Urartu language and Armenian. You can not claim the successor of Urartian's. Show me all international research papers and references instead of day dreaming.
![เป็นไปได้ไหม - WanMai [Performance Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Eh5hItD4Mr0/mqdefault.jpg)
![ILLSLICK X YOUNGOHM - We're The same [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/yUJNkobYR0E/mqdefault.jpg)
Didn't know anything about this Empire before......great information......
They were Indo-Europeans.
Tehy where Aryan tribes which is interesting
I have never heard of this before. Thanks for introducing me to the world's great Empire.
That name Hattussa and many of its local names in Hatti sound suspiciously Polynesian. I wonder if they were proto Polynesians?
After reading the manga entitled "Anatolia", Ive always been curious and amazed of Hittites Empire.😊
same ☺️
OMG you mean red river!
Cheyenne Wagner yes😉
OMG you too!!! I always thought that the story in manga was real as the real history.....
@@narendrapadate4998 intriguing. the love story is the bonus!
This great stuff! Could you guys do one on the Nubian civilization?
Thanka for the information!
Awesome!
The Hittites are mentioned in the Bible! 😁😁😁
The tribe of the Hittites is actually mentioned in the Bible, I think
Benjamin Feld Yeah it was in the story of Esau and Jacob
@@Olumayo2015 in the prophecies too.
There are probably other types of peoples mentioned in the Bible which are not well-known today.
@@andtou1342 *cough Nubians *cough Canaanites,Philistines *cough *cough
Benjamin Feld didn’t know that
Will you do a video about Sea People?
sea peoples is phoenicians mediteraneans large group from liban north africa algerya tunis and greeks
Greetings I'm a descendant of the seafaring people 🇱🇧❤
very nice content
I love listening to this guy speak I would watch a video of him talking about paint dry
Oh my God right like at the be all " ohhh so that's how paint dries" :)
He sounds like the narrators from the old documentaries on history channel & old discovery channel.
Narrator here! Glad you like my work! Doing these scripts is always a joy, and I try to make sure I'm improving with each script. Thanks so much for your support.
Anyone knows who is the author of the fascinating illustrations shown in the video?! 🙏
Looks like they are from Osprey Publishing books, but I am not sure which ones. Probably the one of the Battle of Kadesh
Amazing content.
Make one on mittani Empire who were indo-iranian and followed vedism
They were Indo-Aryans.
@@adityanawani8134whats the difference between indo europeans and indo aryans
It was told that upon the escape of Moses and his tribe from Egypt, they were able to confront the Hittites and the Amorites in the desert. And they were able to win the battle against them.
Its the Chariots that I'm fascinated of.., ie ; were the Chariots designed first by the Egyptians or the Hittites ?
Neither of these.
Chariots were first designed by Indo-Iranian Pastoralists of Sintashta Culture in the Kazakh Steppe.
1:28
Moral of the story.....Academic egos > facts and science
Do one on the Sicarii.
🇹🇷if possible can you put
subtitles thanks
Turks are not related to the hittites 😂
@@wankawanka3053 you're right, not at all
@@wankawanka3053 nope HITTITE EMPIRE IS TURKIC NOT GEY greek
@@islammehmeov2334 Hittite is Canaanites Hebrew 🇮🇱
@@hholicx you idiot HITTITE is in ANATOLIAN TÜRKIYE
Thank you.
I have heard the Hittites were Indo - Aryan and I have heard the Mittani were Indo - Aryan.
Hittites were isolated anatolian subclass of indo-european family and have nothing with indo-aryans.
the people of 1000 gods know that’s just being to Badass of a person right there
But but but there were Hatti before the Hittites.
The history of the Eastern Mediterranean is very interesting
Endless battles till this day lol 🤣 but I love the ancient history more than today's history 😎
where in the odyssey are the Hittites mentioned?
Interesting
Zagrosian/taurusian tribes used to live in this region, in today's closest race is either Armenian or Kurdish in origin, the history belongs to thousands of years before arrival of Turkish or Arabic tribes to the area
My Gratitude.
Do for the Hebrews like the Israelites
hittites was hebrew israelites canaanites born in achamenides empires from samaryakingdom and lions of judah hittites was mixtures of mittani ,they not dissapear they go in siberya russia stepe volga bolgars central asia e,inner mongolia in xiongu tribes and scityians huns cumans names hittites ,is fathers of scitians they spook sanskrit aramaics iranians cuneyforms written by pryest and only spooken by all middle ,east, to not forget in israel only pryest is written manuscript torah or bible,, they was proto mongols iranians , or turkhis iranians ancestor of turkhis and iranians partyans parsy farsy and medes ,they , childrens formed turuk turanians in gogturk empires in tarim basin , scityians and huns and iranians empires in kushan empires ,in persepolis iran city of cyrus the great , greeks was push back from iran persepolis by scityians saka in iran and tarim basin oxus river, ,and north india punjab and taxila kasmir
hittites is fathers of scityians and huns , our ,grand fatehers of roma gypsy populations scityians our fathers from hittites and mittany, and all russia steppe tarim basin and eastern europe all with, r1a, haplogroup is from scityians haplogroup ,becouse scityians empires was from eastern europe croatia russia central asia,, to inner mongolia by xiongu and uyghur turkhis iranics kazak to south east asia indonesya all area to japan saka drink and nagasaka city of memory of scityians ,and north america by scityians siberyans turkhis iranians ,scityians was large tribe family
Asherites
horses are intersting
Bathsheba was NOT a Hittite
Polat Kaya: This citation states that: “The Hattic "Hattus" now became Hittite "Hattusa", and the king took the name of Hattusili I, the "one from Hattusa". I must note that, if the Hittite name HATTUSILI means “one from HATTUSA”, it means so because this word is a pure TURKISH word! This we see from the suffix “LI” at the end of the name HATTUSILI. The Turkish suffix “LI” means “from; of”. The name HATTUSİLİ is like present Turkish sayings such as ANKARALI, SİVASLI, KAYSERİLİ, etc. All of these mean “one from Ankara, one from Sivas, and one from Kayseri respectively. Please note that this does not mean that these people were different tribes with different languages. Thus, this HATTI word of some 4000 years ago is unquestionable evidence that the Hattians were Turkish speaking Tur/Turk/Oguz peoples - contrary to all kinds of mythological terms given in the Bible or anywhere else!
Additionally, the name HITTITE, voiced as “HITTAYT”, is a modern concoction that is fabricated from a Turkish expression intended to replace the old Turanian word HATTI (KHATTI). In other words, the term HITTITEis an Aryanized form of the name HATTI.
Actually, when we decipher the name HITTAYT (HITTITE) by rearranging its letters as “HATTI-TY”, we find that the term HITTITE is really the altered, restructured and alienated form of the Turkish name “HATTİ’Dİ” (HATTI İDİ) meaning “it was Hatti”. This alone indicates that the modern name HITTITE was concocted from the name HATTI into HITTITE. In other words, the original was Turanian AKHATETE (which has been “interpreted” as KHATTI) but the “scholars” who supposedly read these ancient KHATTIAN texts simply changed the name into HITTITE and claimed it as “Indo-European”! Thus, the so-called name HITTITE is another Aryan term fabricated from Turkish.
The meaning of this is that the Hatti empire continued on as a HATTI empire but modern scholars changed the name HATTI to HITTITE and labelled the whole thing as an “Indo-European Empire” to suit their purposes (i.e., painting the ancient Turanian world as an Aryan and Jewish world). Such modern labelling, some 4000 years after the event, changes the history of ancient Anatolia artificially into an “Aryan” or “Indo-European” dominated land rather than a land that was populated by the native Turanian Tur/Turk/Oguz peoples. Since what they did has not been questioned all this time, what they throw in - stayed in - thus giving the impression that what they say was true some 4000 years ago. Continuous propaganda of their concocted falsehood - conditions the unquestioning public into concluding that there was an “Indo-European” Empire in the heart of Turanian Anatolia. The truth is that there was no “Indo-European” languages until the wanderer Aryan priests artificially fabricated them from the much older Turkish language. One example of this is the wanderer Semite priests fabricating “Accadian and Assyrian” languages from the much older Turko-Sumerian language. Recently we have another example of such falsehood stating that “All Indo-European languages originated from Anatolia”. The intensive media propaganda presentation of this so-called “linguistic research of the Indo-European languages” by means of some computer manipulations is well implanted in the minds of the public - as if what was said was the truth. Actually, they would have been speaking the truth if they had labelled their paper as “All Indo-European languages originated from the ancient Turanian language of Turkish”.
Finally, I point the reader to Isaiah 65:17 where the sovereign lord Jehova (YHWA) has said: ‘FOR HERE I AM CREATING NEW HEAVENS AND A NEW EARTH; AND THE FORMER THINGS WILL NOT BE CALLED TO MIND, NEITHER WILL THEY COME UP INTO THE HEART.’
Translated into simple terms, this means “I AM ERASING FROM HISTORY THE ANCIENT TURANIAN WORLD AND INSTALLING IN ITS PLACE A SEMITIC WORLD”. But the later Aryans also took the same concept and ran with it - with the so-called Christianity!
Polat Kaya
2013-07-05
@TH-camCollege-es7tf You don't have a source. I have one.
- Gene D. Matlock - What Strange Mystery Unites the Turkish Nations, India, Catholicism, and Mexico?
It was painfully difficult for me to challenge, weaken and anesthetize my previous religious conditionings. After all, I was born Christian and still am. But I remained strong and resolute in my quest. I did not overlook any kind of anomaly, such as the strange similarities between Brahm-Abraham, Sarah-Saraisvati, and Hakra (Hagar?). I also found other Noahs and several Moseses in Hindu myths, but the Hindus say that many of the myths in their holy books occurred in Central Asia, especially in Siberia, ancestral home of all the Turkish peoples. Even the biblical Hindu Hittites and Amorites, the fathers and mothers of Jerusalem, also Abraham and Sarah, were Turks. If one cannot accept that the Hittites and Amorites were Turkish Krishtayas, he’ll never get any sense out of the Bible.
@TH-camCollege-es7tf - Gene D. Matlock - What Strange Mystery Unites the Turkish Nations, India, Catholicism, and Mexico?
About God Kubera, India’s Regent of the North, King of the Yakshas or Yakhus, God of Wealth, Miners, Farmers, and Good Fortune. Most Hindu scholars are willing to admit that the Krishtayas a.k.a. Aryans were the fathers of Indian civilization. In his book, Ancient Geography of Ayodhya, Dr. Shyam Narain Pande states: Ancient Ayodhya, near Meru mountain, identified with the Pamir plateau is the ancient common home not only of Indians but of mankind…Indians and Iranians claim their common home towards the Asian Steppes, the ‘Ariyana-Vaego’ of the ancient Iranians, the country between Oxus and Xaxartes, north of Pamir plateau. The Western origin of the Chinese civilization proves that people from the steppes and lake regions of Asia, from time immemorial, have settled down in the Yellow River basin. The date is believed to be C. 2145 B.C. on the authority of Shu-chiang and Confucius. Those who followed agriculture in China must have been Rama. According to Dr. Dandekar, the earliest common habitat of the speakers of proto Indo-Europeans [languages] is the steppes between the Urals and Altai. In view of the fact that the proto Hellenes can be shown to have entered in Greece in C. 200 B.C., that the Hittites migrated in C. 2800 BC. towards the Caucasus mountains and the Caspian sea and the proto Aryans must be assumed to have separated from the main stock in C. 2500 B.C., the proto Indo-European unity must be, with reasonable certainty, dated from 3500 B.C. (pp. 45-46.) Several hundred years after the Great Flood, the Turkic country now called Bulgaria appears to have been the leader of all Central Asia. They were a horde called Kubera. Their leaders were Khagans (kings) of the Bulgarians and often called Kubrat, derived from the Sanskrit Kuber-Ratha, meaning, “Hero of the Kuberas.” Kubera appears to have been a large group; not a single individual. Kubera’s followers were called Yakshas or Yakhus. These had to be today’s partially mongoloid Siberian group called Yakhuts. They are associated also with similar peoples in the area called Buryats and Saka. When I was going through a list of Nomads of the Steppes, I was surprised to find many other tribes whose names are also common today in India Proper. In India, we have the Yadu (also known as Yayati, Yakhuda, Japeth, etc.), whose name derived from Yakhut, the Bharats (India’s true name) and the Sakas or Scythians.
@TH-camCollege-es7tf - Gene D. Matlock - What Strange Mystery Unites the Turkish Nations, India, Catholicism, and Mexico?
I can continue with many more biblical statements that God gave only one son to the world from the beginning of time, and no other. This, in my opinion, confirms what Murad Adji said about Tengri, which is that other name of Jesus’ Celestial Father: God or Gospodi, for this name in Sanskrit is Dyupiter (Jupiter). Some readers may want to ask why the Turks insist on claiming Jesus as their own while the Jews do not. This answer is clear. Jesus himself was a Turk. The Turkish Karaite Jews themselves claim to be the original Jews. It has never been hidden from us that one of Jesus’ other names was David Koresh. The Aryans or Kurus (Kurush) were the ruling caste of the world from the very beginning. Even the Bible mentions the Nephilim or Nuphylum. The Bible tells us that when Abraham went to Jerusalem, the Hittites (Turks) were already in control of the city. But we don’t need the Bible to tell us that. This is a historical fact that can’t be denied. Christ also spoke Aramaic which is a Turkish dialect. In some way, the Turks found out that their new Divine King was to be born in Israel. The names of the Three Wise Men prove they were Turks.
@TH-camCollege-es7tf The westerns, said also the earth is 5000years old and jews 6000years. Hahaha. Unbelievable.
Hatti means elephant actually
Hathi means Elephant.
In Levantine Arabic pheel means elephant 👍
I am a Shia Muslim from Lebanon according to my heritage test I belong to some Hittites who settled in Sidon ( coastal Lebanon ) I am very proud to be related to such a dominant people. I believe that during their height, they built Meso in Iraq ( the land between two rivers )
@muslimmuslim123 is simple,facts hittites was hebrew from canaan,mix mittani iranians
@@gcrecords1731 hebrews ... Not those jerks. They were purely an aryan race who possessed R1a1a as their parernal Y haplogroup , same as indo aryans..
🇹🇷💪
They weren't Turks
Maybe some of the Hittite people survived and mixed with the local or nomadic peoples?
@@RaffaelloLorenzusSayde maybe
@shushanna1986 im not mongolian i am tall i have blue green eyes white skin and light brown hair!!!
@shushanna1986 im Türk and Atatürk have blue eyes blond hair
Thank you for this video. I do believe it reinforces the hypothesis that indo European languages originated in the Near East region. Ancient DNA studies have shown that the Hittites had no relationship to Steppe cultures, and as we all know you can't argue with DNA.
But how is that they are called Indo -Europeans?
@@vineethjoshy4819 because they adapted the indo european language.
@@mhdfrb9971 Indo European language to not belong to India. Stop.
first for the very first time
Wrong. Look around I am first
Hmmm wow
this reminds me of rise of kingdoms 🤣
HITTITE EMPIRE IS TURKIS EMPIRE
My teacher is making me watch this bruhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
ancestors of Turks
No, the Hittites are not our ancestors.
No they weren't Turks
Mongolians are the true ancestors of Turks.
@@omerkaya4326 some of them might of mixed so maybe some genetic hittite dna still lives in today's Turkish people?
@@RaffaelloLorenzusSayde yes,this is true but hıttıts are not ancestor of pure turks.
Abraham married a Hittites woman after the death of Sarah
Can we heard more trash theories?
Hello there...
Great Iranian tolerance.
HITTITES are not iranians but TURKS
The Bible tells you exactly what happened to the Hittites.
What happened?
It is turkish people now. . It helenized before. Turk came, they mixed again. But we have %40 to their dna, %15 turkic, greek too. No pure Hittite people.
According to dna nothing.
@@meralkeskin8511 yok %15 değil, en Mongoloid örnek olan karakhanid kaz Turk örneği bile bizi en az %20-30 Turkic gösteriyor, kaz Kıpçak örneği ile %40 medieval Turkic gene sahibiz
We can thank the Jews for their eradication 😂 though to be fair I think God ordered them to go in and clean house. Same with the jebusites and some others
HITTITES are not eradicate they become TURKS 🇹🇷☪️❤️💪☝️
Hitittes came from the East
thanks God, There is no Greek asserting heritage of Hittite. I believe that Turks are the most closely successor of these civilization in Anatolia regarding customs, habit, live manner.
They came to India maybe 😅😅
Hittites did not come to India.
They were likely assimilated by other invaders in Anatolian Plateau.
People of Central Turkey of present time would perhaps have a good deal of genetics from the Hittites.
@@indravrtrahaana763 modern day Turks have nothing in common with hittite
@@enoppp167
Not linguitically but genetically yes.
@@indravrtrahaana763 yes genetically, Turkish are %40-50 hittites, and %30-50 medieval Turkic
first here
Medes are Indo-European people not Semitic ! Medes were one of the 3 Iranic tribes that moved into Iranian plateu from Russia during Aryan migration !
Medes are mixed
Hittites are descendants of Canaan a son of Ham.
Shut up
@@fightfannerd2078 why
So?? What will be there(hittite)?
@@fightfannerd2078 you shut up !!!
Stop with your Bible thumping
Northern Iraqis have Hittite ancestry. Its well known that Assyrians today descend from ancient Assyrians.
Assyrians back then Had married Hittite women.
The only decedent's of the HITTITES ARE THE TURKS and nowan else
@@islammehmeov2334 the ancient Assyrians and Jews often took Hittite women and modern Assyrians and Jews are still around
@@noahtylerpritchett2682 so TURKS are taking assyrian women right now so is the ancient Assyrian empire TURKS
@@islammehmeov2334 nope. You don't know how ethnic membership or descent works.
@@islammehmeov2334 I mean I descend from Celts but I'm not a Celt though.
Descent doesn't mean membership.
And yes Turks also descend from Hittites.
Neither Turks nor Assyrians are Hittite. Just marrying people acquired the descent. Not ethnic membership
There was no "Hittite" empire. The name is taken from a Canaanite tribe mentioned in the Bible because it sounded a bit like Hatti. It was invented because the records discovered at Boghaskoi had a cuneiform version of the treaty with Ramses II of Egypt, and so an empire had to be created in the 13th century BCE to fit with the mistaken date of Ramses II reign which was actually in the 7th/6th century. The empire was in fact the Chaldean Empire and the treaty Ramses II signed was with Nebuchadnezzar. Most of the rest of the movie is a description of the Chaldeans, just time-shifted about 6 centuries.
If intersted...Rothman, quoted said...''All that was known in Mesopotamia came from Armenia and that Armenia is the absent fragment in the entire mosaic of the ancient world's civilization's construction. according to Anthropologist Mitchell S. Rothman regarding the extent of discoveries and specially on the quality of horse bones proved, According to him, that it was from the Shangavit Armenian 6000 years ago that the culture of that area spread around to the ancient world...
Professor Jensen also says. ‘For almost everything that is known in the Hittite language is Old Armenian in form..Historian Sayce 1845-1933) also consider Hittite and Armenian to be one and the same’. what some historians say...H.V. Hilprecht(1859-1925) a Clark research professor of Assyriology and scientific director Babylonian expedition at the University of Penn. argue that the Hittite tongue is Armenian and the Hittites themselves were of Armenian stock...according to Ellis (1861) through language analysis we observe that under the names of Phrygians, Thracians,Pelasgians and Etruscans spread westward from Armenia to Italy and Elis claimed that the closest affinities of the Aryan element are the Armenians ..other historians that agree are..Hellenthal, Busgy, Brand, Wilson, Myers and Falush...let me quote Merrick (2012) All religions are descended from and ancient Vedic cosmology described in the Rib - Veda, originating in Armenia near Mt. Ararat at least 6800 ys ago and the basic concepts of a transcendental mountain extending into space and populated planet Star-gods were developed...he further says...This Astrotheology then migrated with Armenian Aryans to found the Sumerian Ethiopian/Egyptian and Indian civilizations and religions...from Language as a fingerprint Setyan...
@@hikeoganessian9729 Vedas Originated long before the birth of Armemia in Ancient India whose people called it Aryavart...and the Veda you have written about, that is not 'Rib Veda' it's 'Rig Veda'...
If Vedas originated in Armenia then I believe it's people must be knowing that,There are 4 Vedas in Total:
-Rig Veda.
-Yajur Veda.
-Atharva Veda.
-Saam Veda.
Do the people of Armenia even know what does Veda means without Googling(which I'm sure will be done).
@@hikeoganessian9729 rig ved doesn't describe any Armenia. It's geography comprises of South Asia..
@@hikeoganessian9729 now i understand why you guys get treated the way that they generally do. You Armenians are meglomaniac
Total BS. Hittite Empire is well documented. They found a whole library of clay tablets written in Hittite language detailing every aspects of their life in Hattusa in central Anatolia.
the Turks you come from Central Asia and the Kurds you come from the Iranian highlands while the Hittites are genetically ARMENIANS who live in the ARMENIAN highlands go and study history 🤣☀️☀️🇦🇲✌️✌️🔥🔥
Armenians are hurrian urartu origin Turks are Hittite Luwian Kaskian origin.😅
Hittites were central anatolians and have nothing with armenia or armenians. Today their real children are the turks. Armenian genome is similar to hittites because armenians are from a close nation to hittites ( hurrians and urartians ) but not hittites.
check URARTU civiziliation as well. There is no correlation between Armenian and urartians who settle down south eastern Anatolia. they came from Caucasian so there is no point of your assessment regarding heritage. Sorry, you are out.
@@DG-if3gs the kingdom of Van was called urartu by the assyrians by other peoples was called Armina Arminia Armenia, in addition genetically the kingdom of van urartu it's the same genetics of the ARMENIANs even the names the Gods have Armenian names 💪🇦🇲🫡🤫🤫🤫
@@ARMENIA_HAYASTAN prove it? There is no correlation between Urartu language and Armenian. You can not claim the successor of Urartian's. Show me all international research papers and references instead of day dreaming.
This is kurds history lol
@Ramsay Snow Turkish aren't hittite
@@enoppp167 yes we Are
@@islammehmeov2334 nah, Hittites were Indo-European, Turks are Uralo Altaic
@@vassilopoula nah, HITTITE EMPIRE IS TURKIC and only TURKIC
@@vassilopoula language doesn't matter what matter is culture and history with your logic then you are Britains because you spiking English