The Hittite empire - Great Civilizations - See U in History

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 มิ.ย. 2020
  • Great Civilizations: The Hittite empire
    #SeeUinHistory #History #Civilization
    Wiki: The Hittites were an Anatolian people who played an important role in establishing an empire centered on Hattusa in north-central Anatolia around 1600 BC. This empire reached its height during the mid-14th century BC under Suppiluliuma I, when it encompassed an area that included most of Anatolia as well as parts of the northern Levant and Upper Mesopotamia.

ความคิดเห็น • 191

  • @thefilipinageisha4614
    @thefilipinageisha4614 4 ปีที่แล้ว +47

    After reading the manga entitled "Anatolia", Ive always been curious and amazed of Hittites Empire.😊

  • @yordanoslegesse8445
    @yordanoslegesse8445 4 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    I have never heard of this before. Thanks for introducing me to the world's great Empire.

    • @user-wz4hr5xu4k
      @user-wz4hr5xu4k ปีที่แล้ว

      That name Hattussa and many of its local names in Hatti sound suspiciously Polynesian. I wonder if they were proto Polynesians?

  • @Connectinglifelines
    @Connectinglifelines 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Didn't know anything about this Empire before......great information......

  • @sebastianbancroft7184
    @sebastianbancroft7184 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    This great stuff! Could you guys do one on the Nubian civilization?

  • @ozzclark7710
    @ozzclark7710 4 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    I love listening to this guy speak I would watch a video of him talking about paint dry

    • @dillonwaller7735
      @dillonwaller7735 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Oh my God right like at the be all " ohhh so that's how paint dries" :)

    • @PerceptionVsReality333
      @PerceptionVsReality333 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      He sounds like the narrators from the old documentaries on history channel & old discovery channel.

    • @michaelnakhiengchanh5967
      @michaelnakhiengchanh5967 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Narrator here! Glad you like my work! Doing these scripts is always a joy, and I try to make sure I'm improving with each script. Thanks so much for your support.

  • @shekeithaduncan4153
    @shekeithaduncan4153 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Amazing content.

  • @redroseabc5099
    @redroseabc5099 4 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    The Hittites are mentioned in the Bible! 😁😁😁

  • @dankylealinsug3630
    @dankylealinsug3630 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Awesome!

  • @RoyOfficialChanel
    @RoyOfficialChanel 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    very nice content

  • @josegualcermenez6029
    @josegualcermenez6029 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    It was told that upon the escape of Moses and his tribe from Egypt, they were able to confront the Hittites and the Amorites in the desert. And they were able to win the battle against them.

  • @GreenGemGRG
    @GreenGemGRG 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Anyone knows who is the author of the fascinating illustrations shown in the video?! 🙏

    • @cirthador1453
      @cirthador1453 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Looks like they are from Osprey Publishing books, but I am not sure which ones. Probably the one of the Battle of Kadesh

  • @benjaminfeld6388
    @benjaminfeld6388 4 ปีที่แล้ว +58

    The tribe of the Hittites is actually mentioned in the Bible, I think

    • @Olumayo2015
      @Olumayo2015 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Benjamin Feld Yeah it was in the story of Esau and Jacob

    • @JhonbyDimanche
      @JhonbyDimanche 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@Olumayo2015 in the prophecies too.

    • @andtou1342
      @andtou1342 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      There are probably other types of peoples mentioned in the Bible which are not well-known today.

    • @ronjayrose9706
      @ronjayrose9706 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @@andtou1342 *cough Nubians *cough Canaanites,Philistines *cough *cough

    • @nathanld2720
      @nathanld2720 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Benjamin Feld didn’t know that

  • @7ajhubbell
    @7ajhubbell 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you.

  • @michasalamon8315
    @michasalamon8315 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Will you do a video about Sea People?

    • @gcrecords1731
      @gcrecords1731 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      sea peoples is phoenicians mediteraneans large group from liban north africa algerya tunis and greeks

    • @RaffaelloLorenzusSayde
      @RaffaelloLorenzusSayde 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Greetings I'm a descendant of the seafaring people 🇱🇧❤

  • @ShubhamMishrabro
    @ShubhamMishrabro 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Make one on mittani Empire who were indo-iranian and followed vedism

    • @adityanawani8134
      @adityanawani8134 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They were Indo-Aryans.

    • @yourhighness6457
      @yourhighness6457 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@adityanawani8134whats the difference between indo europeans and indo aryans

  • @jackfrost5789
    @jackfrost5789 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Do one on the Sicarii.

  • @sgt.justice0826
    @sgt.justice0826 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Its the Chariots that I'm fascinated of.., ie ; were the Chariots designed first by the Egyptians or the Hittites ?

    • @indravrtrahaana763
      @indravrtrahaana763 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Neither of these.
      Chariots were first designed by Indo-Iranian Pastoralists of Sintashta Culture in the Kazakh Steppe.

  • @nataliekennedy4646
    @nataliekennedy4646 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    the people of 1000 gods know that’s just being to Badass of a person right there

  • @vazak11
    @vazak11 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Interesting

  • @rowanmelton7643
    @rowanmelton7643 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The history of the Eastern Mediterranean is very interesting

    • @RaffaelloLorenzusSayde
      @RaffaelloLorenzusSayde 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Endless battles till this day lol 🤣 but I love the ancient history more than today's history 😎

  • @Atilla963
    @Atilla963 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Polat Kaya: This citation states that: “The Hattic "Hattus" now became Hittite "Hattusa", and the king took the name of Hattusili I, the "one from Hattusa". I must note that, if the Hittite name HATTUSILI means “one from HATTUSA”, it means so because this word is a pure TURKISH word! This we see from the suffix “LI” at the end of the name HATTUSILI. The Turkish suffix “LI” means “from; of”. The name HATTUSİLİ is like present Turkish sayings such as ANKARALI, SİVASLI, KAYSERİLİ, etc. All of these mean “one from Ankara, one from Sivas, and one from Kayseri respectively. Please note that this does not mean that these people were different tribes with different languages. Thus, this HATTI word of some 4000 years ago is unquestionable evidence that the Hattians were Turkish speaking Tur/Turk/Oguz peoples - contrary to all kinds of mythological terms given in the Bible or anywhere else!
    Additionally, the name HITTITE, voiced as “HITTAYT”, is a modern concoction that is fabricated from a Turkish expression intended to replace the old Turanian word HATTI (KHATTI). In other words, the term HITTITEis an Aryanized form of the name HATTI.
    Actually, when we decipher the name HITTAYT (HITTITE) by rearranging its letters as “HATTI-TY”, we find that the term HITTITE is really the altered, restructured and alienated form of the Turkish name “HATTİ’Dİ” (HATTI İDİ) meaning “it was Hatti”. This alone indicates that the modern name HITTITE was concocted from the name HATTI into HITTITE. In other words, the original was Turanian AKHATETE (which has been “interpreted” as KHATTI) but the “scholars” who supposedly read these ancient KHATTIAN texts simply changed the name into HITTITE and claimed it as “Indo-European”! Thus, the so-called name HITTITE is another Aryan term fabricated from Turkish.
    The meaning of this is that the Hatti empire continued on as a HATTI empire but modern scholars changed the name HATTI to HITTITE and labelled the whole thing as an “Indo-European Empire” to suit their purposes (i.e., painting the ancient Turanian world as an Aryan and Jewish world). Such modern labelling, some 4000 years after the event, changes the history of ancient Anatolia artificially into an “Aryan” or “Indo-European” dominated land rather than a land that was populated by the native Turanian Tur/Turk/Oguz peoples. Since what they did has not been questioned all this time, what they throw in - stayed in - thus giving the impression that what they say was true some 4000 years ago. Continuous propaganda of their concocted falsehood - conditions the unquestioning public into concluding that there was an “Indo-European” Empire in the heart of Turanian Anatolia. The truth is that there was no “Indo-European” languages until the wanderer Aryan priests artificially fabricated them from the much older Turkish language. One example of this is the wanderer Semite priests fabricating “Accadian and Assyrian” languages from the much older Turko-Sumerian language. Recently we have another example of such falsehood stating that “All Indo-European languages originated from Anatolia”. The intensive media propaganda presentation of this so-called “linguistic research of the Indo-European languages” by means of some computer manipulations is well implanted in the minds of the public - as if what was said was the truth. Actually, they would have been speaking the truth if they had labelled their paper as “All Indo-European languages originated from the ancient Turanian language of Turkish”.
    Finally, I point the reader to Isaiah 65:17 where the sovereign lord Jehova (YHWA) has said: ‘FOR HERE I AM CREATING NEW HEAVENS AND A NEW EARTH; AND THE FORMER THINGS WILL NOT BE CALLED TO MIND, NEITHER WILL THEY COME UP INTO THE HEART.’
    Translated into simple terms, this means “I AM ERASING FROM HISTORY THE ANCIENT TURANIAN WORLD AND INSTALLING IN ITS PLACE A SEMITIC WORLD”. But the later Aryans also took the same concept and ran with it - with the so-called Christianity!
    Polat Kaya
    2013-07-05

    • @Atilla963
      @Atilla963 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @TH-camCollege-es7tf You don't have a source. I have one.
      - Gene D. Matlock - What Strange Mystery Unites the Turkish Nations, India, Catholicism, and Mexico?
      It was painfully difficult for me to challenge, weaken and anesthetize my previous religious conditionings. After all, I was born Christian and still am. But I remained strong and resolute in my quest. I did not overlook any kind of anomaly, such as the strange similarities between Brahm-Abraham, Sarah-Saraisvati, and Hakra (Hagar?). I also found other Noahs and several Moseses in Hindu myths, but the Hindus say that many of the myths in their holy books occurred in Central Asia, especially in Siberia, ancestral home of all the Turkish peoples. Even the biblical Hindu Hittites and Amorites, the fathers and mothers of Jerusalem, also Abraham and Sarah, were Turks. If one cannot accept that the Hittites and Amorites were Turkish Krishtayas, he’ll never get any sense out of the Bible.

    • @Atilla963
      @Atilla963 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @TH-camCollege-es7tf - Gene D. Matlock - What Strange Mystery Unites the Turkish Nations, India, Catholicism, and Mexico?
      About God Kubera, India’s Regent of the North, King of the Yakshas or Yakhus, God of Wealth, Miners, Farmers, and Good Fortune. Most Hindu scholars are willing to admit that the Krishtayas a.k.a. Aryans were the fathers of Indian civilization. In his book, Ancient Geography of Ayodhya, Dr. Shyam Narain Pande states: Ancient Ayodhya, near Meru mountain, identified with the Pamir plateau is the ancient common home not only of Indians but of mankind…Indians and Iranians claim their common home towards the Asian Steppes, the ‘Ariyana-Vaego’ of the ancient Iranians, the country between Oxus and Xaxartes, north of Pamir plateau. The Western origin of the Chinese civilization proves that people from the steppes and lake regions of Asia, from time immemorial, have settled down in the Yellow River basin. The date is believed to be C. 2145 B.C. on the authority of Shu-chiang and Confucius. Those who followed agriculture in China must have been Rama. According to Dr. Dandekar, the earliest common habitat of the speakers of proto Indo-Europeans [languages] is the steppes between the Urals and Altai. In view of the fact that the proto Hellenes can be shown to have entered in Greece in C. 200 B.C., that the Hittites migrated in C. 2800 BC. towards the Caucasus mountains and the Caspian sea and the proto Aryans must be assumed to have separated from the main stock in C. 2500 B.C., the proto Indo-European unity must be, with reasonable certainty, dated from 3500 B.C. (pp. 45-46.) Several hundred years after the Great Flood, the Turkic country now called Bulgaria appears to have been the leader of all Central Asia. They were a horde called Kubera. Their leaders were Khagans (kings) of the Bulgarians and often called Kubrat, derived from the Sanskrit Kuber-Ratha, meaning, “Hero of the Kuberas.” Kubera appears to have been a large group; not a single individual. Kubera’s followers were called Yakshas or Yakhus. These had to be today’s partially mongoloid Siberian group called Yakhuts. They are associated also with similar peoples in the area called Buryats and Saka. When I was going through a list of Nomads of the Steppes, I was surprised to find many other tribes whose names are also common today in India Proper. In India, we have the Yadu (also known as Yayati, Yakhuda, Japeth, etc.), whose name derived from Yakhut, the Bharats (India’s true name) and the Sakas or Scythians.

    • @Atilla963
      @Atilla963 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @TH-camCollege-es7tf - Gene D. Matlock - What Strange Mystery Unites the Turkish Nations, India, Catholicism, and Mexico?
      I can continue with many more biblical statements that God gave only one son to the world from the beginning of time, and no other. This, in my opinion, confirms what Murad Adji said about Tengri, which is that other name of Jesus’ Celestial Father: God or Gospodi, for this name in Sanskrit is Dyupiter (Jupiter). Some readers may want to ask why the Turks insist on claiming Jesus as their own while the Jews do not. This answer is clear. Jesus himself was a Turk. The Turkish Karaite Jews themselves claim to be the original Jews. It has never been hidden from us that one of Jesus’ other names was David Koresh. The Aryans or Kurus (Kurush) were the ruling caste of the world from the very beginning. Even the Bible mentions the Nephilim or Nuphylum. The Bible tells us that when Abraham went to Jerusalem, the Hittites (Turks) were already in control of the city. But we don’t need the Bible to tell us that. This is a historical fact that can’t be denied. Christ also spoke Aramaic which is a Turkish dialect. In some way, the Turks found out that their new Divine King was to be born in Israel. The names of the Three Wise Men prove they were Turks.

    • @Atilla963
      @Atilla963 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @TH-camCollege-es7tf The westerns, said also the earth is 5000years old and jews 6000years. Hahaha. Unbelievable.

  • @abooswalehmosafeer173
    @abooswalehmosafeer173 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    My Gratitude.

  • @E.J813
    @E.J813 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    🇹🇷if possible can you put
    subtitles thanks

    • @wankawanka3053
      @wankawanka3053 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Turks are not related to the hittites 😂

    • @E.J813
      @E.J813 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@wankawanka3053 you're right, not at all

    • @islammehmeov2334
      @islammehmeov2334 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@wankawanka3053 nope HITTITE EMPIRE IS TURKIC NOT GEY greek

    • @Agamemnonn_
      @Agamemnonn_ ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@islammehmeov2334 Hittite is Canaanites Hebrew 🇮🇱

    • @islammehmeov2334
      @islammehmeov2334 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Agamemnonn_ you idiot HITTITE is in ANATOLIAN TÜRKIYE

  • @---TylerDurden---
    @---TylerDurden--- 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    1:28
    Moral of the story.....Academic egos > facts and science

  • @duncansalyer2999
    @duncansalyer2999 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    where in the odyssey are the Hittites mentioned?

  • @_robustus_
    @_robustus_ 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    But but but there were Hatti before the Hittites.

  • @delaramsalmassi4063
    @delaramsalmassi4063 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I have heard the Hittites were Indo - Aryan and I have heard the Mittani were Indo - Aryan.

  • @irockycat8156
    @irockycat8156 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    horses are intersting

  • @nathanld2720
    @nathanld2720 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hmmm wow

  • @toofastforyall8590
    @toofastforyall8590 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I am a Shia Muslim from Lebanon according to my heritage test I belong to some Hittites who settled in Sidon ( coastal Lebanon ) I am very proud to be related to such a dominant people. I believe that during their height, they built Meso in Iraq ( the land between two rivers )

    • @gcrecords1731
      @gcrecords1731 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @muslimmuslim123 is simple,facts hittites was hebrew from canaan,mix mittani iranians

    • @FilesdocumentsAndreposit-kr3vb
      @FilesdocumentsAndreposit-kr3vb ปีที่แล้ว

      @@gcrecords1731 hebrews ... Not those jerks. They were purely an aryan race who possessed R1a1a as their parernal Y haplogroup , same as indo aryans..

  • @Manuel-gu9ls
    @Manuel-gu9ls 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Do for the Hebrews like the Israelites

    • @gcrecords1731
      @gcrecords1731 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      hittites was hebrew israelites canaanites born in achamenides empires from samaryakingdom and lions of judah hittites was mixtures of mittani ,they not dissapear they go in siberya russia stepe volga bolgars central asia e,inner mongolia in xiongu tribes and scityians huns cumans names hittites ,is fathers of scitians they spook sanskrit aramaics iranians cuneyforms written by pryest and only spooken by all middle ,east, to not forget in israel only pryest is written manuscript torah or bible,, they was proto mongols iranians , or turkhis iranians ancestor of turkhis and iranians partyans parsy farsy and medes ,they , childrens formed turuk turanians in gogturk empires in tarim basin , scityians and huns and iranians empires in kushan empires ,in persepolis iran city of cyrus the great , greeks was push back from iran persepolis by scityians saka in iran and tarim basin oxus river, ,and north india punjab and taxila kasmir

    • @gcrecords1731
      @gcrecords1731 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      hittites is fathers of scityians and huns , our ,grand fatehers of roma gypsy populations scityians our fathers from hittites and mittany, and all russia steppe tarim basin and eastern europe all with, r1a, haplogroup is from scityians haplogroup ,becouse scityians empires was from eastern europe croatia russia central asia,, to inner mongolia by xiongu and uyghur turkhis iranics kazak to south east asia indonesya all area to japan saka drink and nagasaka city of memory of scityians ,and north america by scityians siberyans turkhis iranians ,scityians was large tribe family

    • @joelasher78
      @joelasher78 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Asherites

  • @insertadverthere862
    @insertadverthere862 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello there...

  • @samuelgantt3271
    @samuelgantt3271 ปีที่แล้ว

    My teacher is making me watch this bruhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

  • @iquoteeverythingisay4627
    @iquoteeverythingisay4627 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    first for the very first time

  • @dogperson4436
    @dogperson4436 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hatti means elephant actually

  • @ratnasahu3116
    @ratnasahu3116 ปีที่แล้ว

    Abraham married a Hittites woman after the death of Sarah

  • @sunshine-sw6dj
    @sunshine-sw6dj ปีที่แล้ว +1

    this reminds me of rise of kingdoms 🤣

  • @joshuawoodall422
    @joshuawoodall422 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Bathsheba was NOT a Hittite

  • @AngusCon3418
    @AngusCon3418 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for this video. I do believe it reinforces the hypothesis that indo European languages originated in the Near East region. Ancient DNA studies have shown that the Hittites had no relationship to Steppe cultures, and as we all know you can't argue with DNA.

    • @vineethjoshy4819
      @vineethjoshy4819 ปีที่แล้ว

      But how is that they are called Indo -Europeans?

    • @mhdfrb9971
      @mhdfrb9971 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@vineethjoshy4819 because they adapted the indo european language.

    • @vineethjoshy4819
      @vineethjoshy4819 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mhdfrb9971 Indo European language to not belong to India. Stop.

  • @Son0fCarthage
    @Son0fCarthage 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    The Bible tells you exactly what happened to the Hittites.

    • @user-dh8ng8mq6y
      @user-dh8ng8mq6y 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      What happened?

    • @meralkeskin8511
      @meralkeskin8511 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It is turkish people now. . It helenized before. Turk came, they mixed again. But we have %40 to their dna, %15 turkic, greek too. No pure Hittite people.

    • @noahtylerpritchett2682
      @noahtylerpritchett2682 ปีที่แล้ว

      According to dna nothing.

    • @latahzen949
      @latahzen949 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@meralkeskin8511 yok %15 değil, en Mongoloid örnek olan karakhanid kaz Turk örneği bile bizi en az %20-30 Turkic gösteriyor, kaz Kıpçak örneği ile %40 medieval Turkic gene sahibiz

  • @heathermason3513
    @heathermason3513 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    🇹🇷💪

    • @enoppp167
      @enoppp167 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      They weren't Turks

    • @RaffaelloLorenzusSayde
      @RaffaelloLorenzusSayde 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Maybe some of the Hittite people survived and mixed with the local or nomadic peoples?

    • @heathermason3513
      @heathermason3513 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@RaffaelloLorenzusSayde maybe

    • @heathermason3513
      @heathermason3513 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @shushanna1986 im not mongolian i am tall i have blue green eyes white skin and light brown hair!!!

    • @heathermason3513
      @heathermason3513 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @shushanna1986 im Türk and Atatürk have blue eyes blond hair

  • @jamessell1394
    @jamessell1394 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great Iranian tolerance.

  • @FilesdocumentsAndreposit-kr3vb
    @FilesdocumentsAndreposit-kr3vb ปีที่แล้ว

    Hitittes came from the East

  • @kylelederman9464
    @kylelederman9464 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    first here

  • @ajnova9971
    @ajnova9971 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Medes are Indo-European people not Semitic ! Medes were one of the 3 Iranic tribes that moved into Iranian plateu from Russia during Aryan migration !

    • @aliklc1970
      @aliklc1970 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Medes are mixed

  • @deepsuman2368
    @deepsuman2368 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    They came to India maybe 😅😅

    • @indravrtrahaana763
      @indravrtrahaana763 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hittites did not come to India.
      They were likely assimilated by other invaders in Anatolian Plateau.
      People of Central Turkey of present time would perhaps have a good deal of genetics from the Hittites.

    • @enoppp167
      @enoppp167 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@indravrtrahaana763 modern day Turks have nothing in common with hittite

    • @indravrtrahaana763
      @indravrtrahaana763 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@enoppp167
      Not linguitically but genetically yes.

    • @latahzen949
      @latahzen949 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@indravrtrahaana763 yes genetically, Turkish are %40-50 hittites, and %30-50 medieval Turkic

  • @andrewmcandrew7642
    @andrewmcandrew7642 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    We can thank the Jews for their eradication 😂 though to be fair I think God ordered them to go in and clean house. Same with the jebusites and some others

    • @islammehmeov2334
      @islammehmeov2334 ปีที่แล้ว

      HITTITES are not eradicate they become TURKS 🇹🇷☪️❤️💪☝️

  • @noahtylerpritchett2682
    @noahtylerpritchett2682 ปีที่แล้ว

    Northern Iraqis have Hittite ancestry. Its well known that Assyrians today descend from ancient Assyrians.
    Assyrians back then Had married Hittite women.

    • @islammehmeov2334
      @islammehmeov2334 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The only decedent's of the HITTITES ARE THE TURKS and nowan else

    • @noahtylerpritchett2682
      @noahtylerpritchett2682 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@islammehmeov2334 the ancient Assyrians and Jews often took Hittite women and modern Assyrians and Jews are still around

    • @islammehmeov2334
      @islammehmeov2334 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@noahtylerpritchett2682 so TURKS are taking assyrian women right now so is the ancient Assyrian empire TURKS

    • @noahtylerpritchett2682
      @noahtylerpritchett2682 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@islammehmeov2334 nope. You don't know how ethnic membership or descent works.

    • @noahtylerpritchett2682
      @noahtylerpritchett2682 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@islammehmeov2334 I mean I descend from Celts but I'm not a Celt though.
      Descent doesn't mean membership.
      And yes Turks also descend from Hittites.
      Neither Turks nor Assyrians are Hittite. Just marrying people acquired the descent. Not ethnic membership

  • @ishtarbabylon4869
    @ishtarbabylon4869 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    ancestors of Turks

    • @omerkaya4326
      @omerkaya4326 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No, the Hittites are not our ancestors.

    • @enoppp167
      @enoppp167 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      No they weren't Turks

    • @kinglong5726
      @kinglong5726 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Mongolians are the true ancestors of Turks.

    • @RaffaelloLorenzusSayde
      @RaffaelloLorenzusSayde 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@omerkaya4326 some of them might of mixed so maybe some genetic hittite dna still lives in today's Turkish people?

    • @omerkaya4326
      @omerkaya4326 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@RaffaelloLorenzusSayde yes,this is true but hıttıts are not ancestor of pure turks.

  • @Sympneology
    @Sympneology 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    There was no "Hittite" empire. The name is taken from a Canaanite tribe mentioned in the Bible because it sounded a bit like Hatti. It was invented because the records discovered at Boghaskoi had a cuneiform version of the treaty with Ramses II of Egypt, and so an empire had to be created in the 13th century BCE to fit with the mistaken date of Ramses II reign which was actually in the 7th/6th century. The empire was in fact the Chaldean Empire and the treaty Ramses II signed was with Nebuchadnezzar. Most of the rest of the movie is a description of the Chaldeans, just time-shifted about 6 centuries.

    • @hikeoganessian9729
      @hikeoganessian9729 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      If intersted...Rothman, quoted said...''All that was known in Mesopotamia came from Armenia and that Armenia is the absent fragment in the entire mosaic of the ancient world's civilization's construction. according to Anthropologist Mitchell S. Rothman regarding the extent of discoveries and specially on the quality of horse bones proved, According to him, that it was from the Shangavit Armenian 6000 years ago that the culture of that area spread around to the ancient world...
      Professor Jensen also says. ‘For almost everything that is known in the Hittite language is Old Armenian in form..Historian Sayce 1845-1933) also consider Hittite and Armenian to be one and the same’. what some historians say...H.V. Hilprecht(1859-1925) a Clark research professor of Assyriology and scientific director Babylonian expedition at the University of Penn. argue that the Hittite tongue is Armenian and the Hittites themselves were of Armenian stock...according to Ellis (1861) through language analysis we observe that under the names of Phrygians, Thracians,Pelasgians and Etruscans spread westward from Armenia to Italy and Elis claimed that the closest affinities of the Aryan element are the Armenians ..other historians that agree are..Hellenthal, Busgy, Brand, Wilson, Myers and Falush...let me quote Merrick (2012) All religions are descended from and ancient Vedic cosmology described in the Rib - Veda, originating in Armenia near Mt. Ararat at least 6800 ys ago and the basic concepts of a transcendental mountain extending into space and populated planet Star-gods were developed...he further says...This Astrotheology then migrated with Armenian Aryans to found the Sumerian Ethiopian/Egyptian and Indian civilizations and religions...from Language as a fingerprint Setyan...

    • @himanshukuanr7832
      @himanshukuanr7832 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@hikeoganessian9729 Vedas Originated long before the birth of Armemia in Ancient India whose people called it Aryavart...and the Veda you have written about, that is not 'Rib Veda' it's 'Rig Veda'...
      If Vedas originated in Armenia then I believe it's people must be knowing that,There are 4 Vedas in Total:
      -Rig Veda.
      -Yajur Veda.
      -Atharva Veda.
      -Saam Veda.
      Do the people of Armenia even know what does Veda means without Googling(which I'm sure will be done).

    • @FilesdocumentsAndreposit-kr3vb
      @FilesdocumentsAndreposit-kr3vb ปีที่แล้ว

      @@hikeoganessian9729 rig ved doesn't describe any Armenia. It's geography comprises of South Asia..

    • @FilesdocumentsAndreposit-kr3vb
      @FilesdocumentsAndreposit-kr3vb ปีที่แล้ว

      @@hikeoganessian9729 now i understand why you guys get treated the way that they generally do. You Armenians are meglomaniac

    • @kuduzdoktorhektor
      @kuduzdoktorhektor 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Total BS. Hittite Empire is well documented. They found a whole library of clay tablets written in Hittite language detailing every aspects of their life in Hattusa in central Anatolia.

  • @favourgeoffrey2414
    @favourgeoffrey2414 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Hittites are descendants of Canaan a son of Ham.

  • @hamaa17
    @hamaa17 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is kurds history lol

    • @enoppp167
      @enoppp167 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Ramsay Snow Turkish aren't hittite

    • @islammehmeov2334
      @islammehmeov2334 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@enoppp167 yes we Are

    • @vassilopoula
      @vassilopoula ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@islammehmeov2334 nah, Hittites were Indo-European, Turks are Uralo Altaic

    • @islammehmeov2334
      @islammehmeov2334 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@vassilopoula nah, HITTITE EMPIRE IS TURKIC and only TURKIC

    • @islammehmeov2334
      @islammehmeov2334 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@vassilopoula language doesn't matter what matter is culture and history with your logic then you are Britains because you spiking English

  • @ARMENIA_HAYASTAN
    @ARMENIA_HAYASTAN 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    the Turks you come from Central Asia and the Kurds you come from the Iranian highlands while the Hittites are genetically ARMENIANS who live in the ARMENIAN highlands go and study history 🤣☀️☀️🇦🇲✌️✌️🔥🔥

    • @aliklc1970
      @aliklc1970 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Armenians are hurrian urartu origin Turks are Hittite Luwian Kaskian origin.😅